‘Spare’: Princess Charlotte’s flower-crown at the wedding wasn’t deadly

We know, for sure, that there were shenanigans all around the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s 2018 wedding. Thomas Markle was being managed by the British media – if not Kensington Palace – and Prince William and Kate (the Wedding Karens) seemed hellbent on bringing misery to Meghan throughout the entire wedding planning. Therefore, it’s always surprised me a little that Meghan is always so positive about the wedding and how perfect it was. I think most brides, having dealt with endless bulls–t for weeks/months beforehand, would allow those bad experiences to taint their memories of their big day. But not Meghan. The issue is that Harry is a grudge-carrying Virgo who never forgets, and his memoir is full of all of those grudges. He’s still mad – as he should be! – that Meghan was accused of being careless about Princess Charlotte’s health because Charlotte wore a little flower crown at the wedding. I remember this dumb story too.

A “poisonous” claim by the UK press pushed Prince Harry over the edge. In “Spare,” the Duke of Sussex, 38, detailed some of the incidents leading up to him and his wife, Meghan Markle, suing Associated Newspapers Limited — which owns the Mail on Sunday — and the royal said he felt “energized” about the lawsuit after one particular story in the Express accused his wife of giving Princess Charlotte deadly flowers.

In the book, Harry wrote about the vicious media attacks carried out against his wife, and how a claim by the British paper sensationally accused Markle of putting Charlotte’s life at risk due to having the flower girls wear crowns containing lily of the valley to the couple’s 2018 wedding.

The flower, which can be “potentially poisonous” if ingested by kids, the duke wrote, was included in the adorable white headpieces and is a traditional choice for royal brides to use on their big day; both Princess Diana and Kate Middleton featured the flower in their wedding bouquets. While it might sound like a scene from “Breaking Bad,” it’s true the flower can be deadly if eaten. However, Harry explained that the chances of fatal harm are slim.

Writing that the reaction to ingesting lily of the valley in most cases is “discomfort,” he shared that “very rarely” would such an incident end in death.

The paper even went on to use a picture of his “poor niece” sneezing, but appearing to be in “agony” alongside one of Markle in her wedding dress appearing serene, “ignoring the imminent death of the little angel.”

The duke went on to say that it wasn’t his bride who made the alleged “reckless decision” to use the flower and that the crowns were “made by a professional florist.”

“None of it mattered,” Harry wrote, claiming “the ‘Meghan the Killer’ story was too good to pass up” for the paper.

[From Page Six]

I forgot that part about “ignoring the imminent death of the little angel.” They were laying it on a bit thick, my God. Lily-of-the-valley is a super-common flower for bridal bouquets and wedding crowns. Brides who choose the flower aren’t trying to kill anyone. What’s also interesting about this is that the British commenters’ oft-repeated claim that Harry and Meghan were so “beloved” and “popular” around the wedding, and then Harry and Meghan destroyed their own popularity by… you know, existing and trying to work in the same office as Jealous & Buttons. Except that this story shows that the media was always trying to start sh-t with Meghan in particular.

This is another somewhat “minor” issue which actually should have been worked out by the KP communications office – a simple “please, this is idiotic, Meghan isn’t trying to kill a child with flowers” might not have stopped the story, but it would have drawn a line in the sand and set a better tone. We’re not talking about some huge moment of moral courage here, just general competence from KP’s communications office. Of course KP couldn’t manage that.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

60 Responses to “‘Spare’: Princess Charlotte’s flower-crown at the wedding wasn’t deadly”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Noki says:

    Wow ‘imminent death..’ these rota rats must feel so dumb when they retreat back home and talk about their day at work.

    • Nilber says:

      I think the delusion is strong with them. At this point, I truly think they believe their own lies. The phrase “I reject your reality and substitute my own” truly describes the royal rota and their followers. The sad thing is it also describes the royal family to a tee.

  2. Cel2495 says:

    The BM and the RF are trash

  3. equality says:

    I’m glad he’s being petty about some of this stuff and refuting it. Petty was printing such stupidity to begin with. There are W&K right beside Charlotte in pictures. If there was such imminent danger why aren’t the wonderful parents ripping that crown off the child’s head?

    • C-Shell says:

      And, how ridiculous, is the Early Years Expert going to step in when her precious angel is EATING HER CROWN OF FLOWERS?! FFS

      • Ruby says:

        Right? Did they really think Charlotte was at risk of ripping that crown off her head and chowing down mid ceremony? Good grief.

      • Andy Dufresne says:

        Uhmmm, right William and Kate. Keep using your children as buffers, for smear campaigns against Harry and Meghan, and all other kinds of BS you both can think of. Let’s see what will happen to them when they get older.

      • Kittenmom says:

        😹 this mental image is just too much 😹

  4. Laura D says:

    Oh dear. I’ve always laughed so much at the “killer bouquet” story that I hadn’t made the association that the nastiness was there even during the wedding. Even though I still find the story hilarious (because it’s so ridiculous) it’s sad that on what was a lovely day the jealousy from CH and KP meant none of them could let H&M have their day to shine.

  5. Amy Bee says:

    I’m sure William told the KP comms not to respond to any stories about Meghan.

  6. Tessa says:

    Just gross

  7. Chloe says:

    Charlotte looked absolutely adorable on the big day. Dress and flower crown included. It’s a real shame that her mother was such a bridezilla and that the media decided to stir shit up for nothing with the flower crown story.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      And fortunately, she survived this dastardly plot and is healthy and thriving to this very day!

  8. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Harry was a man obsessed and possessed by these stupid stories. He is even correcting the record on this? The BM had him exactly where they wanted him, consumed by their inane content. I’m glad he’s now on a media diet because reading and getting angry about every piece of printed trash will drive one mad, and the BM would love that for him. (Yeah, I get it he’s refuting everything and putting it all on the record, but tbf, refuting something as dumb as this seems excessive.)

    • Tessa says:

      I do not consider it excessive. It was a charge that roused the d e r a n g e r s on social media. There were really horrific comments about this.

    • Nerd says:

      This might be a dumb story but the intent and outcome of this article ramped up the threats and attacks on his wife. The accusation that Meghan was threatening the life of Charlotte was to create complete outrage and hate for Meghan. It was always revealing to me that the article focused so heavily on the potential harm to Charlotte and never on the other bridesmaids who were also wearing the crown. The absence of concern for all of the little girls at Meghan’s wedding and the added absence of concern for the girls at Diana’s and Kate’s weddings with the same flower was evidence that the article was clearly to create outrage with royalists who somehow see the royals as superior and have no grasp with reality.

      • Becks1 says:

        Yeah, the purpose of this story was similar to the purpose of the “Meghan made Kate cry” story. the Black American actress is out to hurt the white royals. Making Kate cry wasn’t sufficient, oh no – she tried to KILL Princess Charlotte!!!

        These stories, taken one at a time, seem ludicrous and like Harry is hyperfocusing on the wrong things. But he’s clearly looking at the smear campaign the same way we all did – where the issue is that all these stories added up to paint a very negative picture of Meghan (if you believed them) and probably increased the death threats against her.

      • ThatsNotOkay says:

        It boggles the mind, because it’s objectively untrue. Like, it’s not palace sources briefing on something that might or might not have happened and thus one has to tell one’s side and clear the air. Using lily-of-the-valley in a head wreath is not endangering lives. Whoever believed that is hopeless anyway and isn’t reading Harry’s book for clarification.

    • Emily_C says:

      So if a lie is dumb you should just let it lie? That makes no sense whatsoever.

    • C says:

      Lol, are you serious right now? Tabloids are STILL saying she “bullied” Charlotte in the fittings. Charlotte is a major stick the tabloids use to try to beat Meghan with. Why wouldn’t Harry be upset about that?

      Remember Meghan was sent white powder during the engagement, and that people were arrested for death threats against her and Harry. During the engagement. These stories didn’t help. Of course they were stupid. They are still dangerous.

    • equality says:

      If it’s so small have you been complaining to media outlets that ran the story over and over and amplified it? Or is your concern only that PH not refute lies because they are “too small” in your sight?

    • WiththeAmericann says:

      I think that if you see it from his point of view, it looks very different. Here is his wife being attacked by his family and the UK press because she is marrying him.

      If he didn’t correct these things, how would he feel as a human being?

      If “my” people spread lies about my spouse, I’d feel it was on me to correct each and every thing, and I’d also feel like my marriage depended a bit on my willingness to do so. He was helpless before, and I’d imagine that caused him a loss of self respect.

    • HamsterJam says:

      But you do feel free to refute the refuting of it

    • Laura D says:

      The way I see it is a newspaper printing something as ridiculous as this is “excessive.” If Charlotte (and the rest of the children for that matter) was seriously in danger from the flowers, do they seriously expect us to believe that palace would allow them to be used? I’m glad he put it in the book because it shows the world how petty and spiteful the tabloids were towards Meghan right from the beginning.

      As I said up thread I didn’t make the connection because I found (and still find) the story hilarious but, it’s an excellent reminder of how early the smear campaign started.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Laura D, it is hilarious, because it’s so absurd. I’m glad that Harry put this in the book, because it shows the global media how completely broken the british media is.

    • Haylie says:

      The media putting this story out there and deranged Karen running with it in their online smear campaigns was excessive.

      There’s a weird agenda where people don’t want these ridiculous claims corrected on the record because it destroys their anti-Meghan narrative.

  9. ABB says:

    Pro florist here to say 1) a lot of common commercial flowers are poisonous to a degree — especially because the regulations are different for non food produce. I’ve had to tell brides “no no you can NOT save your laurel leaves for soup!” 2) lily of the valley is SoOOoo expensive. We’re talking $7 a stem and they’re tiny. Only the most luxe wedding would use them in things like flower crowns for children — we normally use less expensive things that can take a beating. Rosebuds, waxflower and the like. Very sweet to make Charlotte’s flower crown so special.

    • Truthiness says:

      💯 Plus if you look at all the various angles on her flower crown there is ONE single lily of the valley. We have eyes you know. It’s placed for maximum effect right at 12 o’clock. Even if we give them leeway and think there’re going to hide a couple in back (super unlikely given it’s cost, rarity, and how hard it is to work in a crown), we’re up to just a teeny tiny part of the flower crown. Unbelievable how far they’re trying to reach.

  10. Emily_C says:

    Lily of the valley has always been my favorite flower. We’d have bouquets of it around the place whenever possible because of that, ever since I was a very small child. Because I knew not to eat the damn things.

    Unless Charlotte managed to eat that entire crown, it wasn’t going to hurt her. Lily of the valley doesn’t give out some kind of atmospheric poison, ffs. This was so stupid. (Also I hate calling children “angels”. It’s a sort of un-personing.)

  11. Deanne says:

    I had no idea that my sister was an attempted murderer. Every one of her attendants, including the flower girl, had lily of the valley in their bouquet. I have a bunch of it in my garden. Hopefully none of my family and friends will get the urge to eat if it I’m slow with the hors d’oeuvres. The insanity of so many of these stories is staggering.

    • Deering24 says:

      At most weddings, I’ve been to, kids either 1) can’t wait to get their headdress off and get cake; 2) love it so much they wear it the rest of the day. I have yet to see any child try to eat theirs–especially with cake in the offing. 😉

  12. Steph says:

    Char looks adorable! I just noticed that they had George in a military uniform too. That’s weird considering how young he was. I thought the tradition was for the men of the family.

    • Becks1 says:

      All the page boys’ outfits were modeled after Harry’s uniform.

      • Steph says:

        I hadn’t noticed that. I guess that makes a little more sense. Since I only saw George, I thought it was just bc he was a royal.

      • Harper says:

        Funny how there was no drama about George’s page boy outfit. I assume he needed a fitting for it too, and that Kate managed to get him to it without insulting Meghan or making her cry.

      • Nic919 says:

        The page boys outfits were the best I have seen for any royal wedding. Often they try to dress them as Victorian school boys and they look silly in them. These small uniforms were cute.

  13. C says:

    Lily of the valley is my favorite flower, to the point where I adored Kate’s wedding themes because it was centered around it. Her bridesmaids had flower crowns that were EXCLUSIVELY lily of the valley. Her father’s corsage was lily of the valley. It was a major theme of her cake. And I was in England at the time of Kate’s wedding and not one word was ever printed about how dangerous it was. It’s immediately what I thought of when this “dangerous flower” story came out.
    I also remember the stories of her scenting Westminster Abbey with Jo Malone candles and sprays and the press was effusive about what “good taste she had” in 2011. That’s also what came to my mind with the stories of Meghan saying St. George’s Chapel was “musty” in 2018.

    • nutella toast says:

      @c Jo Malone candles filling Westminster Abbey? Those alone must have cost tens of thousands because one candle costs more than my electric bill…and they’re not *that* special. Love the details about Kate’s wedding – I guess she must have aspired to be a serial killer.

      • C says:

        LOL a serial killer.

        Sidenote: Meghan chose Diptyque for her wedding and I will die on this hill that Diptyque is the one luxury candle house worth its money. I can smell their candles in another room even when they’re unlit.

  14. Valerie says:

    I remember that story and the BuzzFeed article and all the take downs of it. It was certainly ridiculed a lot, the flower thing.

    Does Harry ever address how much support they received from the American media and how much more powerful and influential they are than their British counterparts?

    • C says:

      It is naive to pretend that the American media was covering this even remotely the same amount as the British media was. And they didn’t live in America at the time, they lived in the UK where the monarchy colluded with the tabloids.

      • Valerie says:

        You’re not answering my question. Does he address it? American media wasn’t covering it as much, but it was easily the second country that was covering it the most. The bride was American and Americans love pop culture. American media has much more reach and influence than British press. This is surely not an irrelevant fact considering his wife is American and they moved there a few years later. Do they only talk about the massive amount of support they have gotten when it comes from celebrities?

        Villifying the journalistic integrity of British tabloids like it’s some discovery is akin to claiming WWE wrestlers aren’t actually fighting. Sure British tabloids are trash but I have a hard time believing the lowest tier of journalism in the UK is really that convincing and powerful to turn a whole country against them.

      • C says:

        No, not as much as the British media. Why should he? They are not the primary subject. It IS irrelevant because even if the bride was American, *she was living in the UK about to marry a prince of the UK*. The American press can’t be competing with negative UK sources if they aren’t even covering it to the same degree which they were not. And clearly if they were, it wasn’t enough to stem the tide, so what exactly is your point, Valerie?

        Your second paragraph is what shows you aren’t paying attention. Some of these tabloids were STARTED by British aristocracy and are still in their hands. The others are Murdoch. And the royals are directly involved with all of them. You seem to be under the impression they are the same as the National Inquirers gathering dust in gas stations in the US. They are not. Why on earth would you find it hard to believe a comprehensive smear campaign wouldn’t be successful if it is being given air and food by the Royal family itself?

      • HeatherC says:

        The main difference is in the UK it appears the Daily Mail is treated as real news. In US, tabloids such as The Enquirer, In Touch and celeb heavy publications as People are not treated the same as The New York Times, or even the Utica Observer-Dispatch. I’m willing to say even the New York Post, though sold as “real” newspaper, isn’t regarded as a real one (though to their credit, they come up with some snappy headlines!)

    • C says:

      Also, Murdoch media and its tactics are international.

      • Nic919 says:

        Page six has ramped up negative stories about this book when they barely covered anything royal in the past. It’s clear murdoch put out a directive.

    • Emily_C says:

      As I said earlier today, people do have memories, Valerie. Like for remembering people’s past posts. Just sayin’.

    • Christine says:

      This is an interesting question, and I have no clue what the answer is.

      I hope that Harry and Meghan have never considered addressing the American media, publicly, because it is completely unnecessary. Should they say, “thank you for not continuing the narrative that Harry is a cuckhold!”? How does one start that conversation? I have no idea.

  15. Concern Fae says:

    All florist flowers are dangerous to eat because of the pesticides. We had Daffodil Day back in high school, where you bought daffodils for someone and they were delivered during the school day. The money went to some charity. Of course what happened one year was that the boys bought flowers for each other and then started eating them in class. Next year there was a warning that the flowers were dangerous to eat because of the pesticides and if people ate them, the flower sale would be cancelled.

    OK, just went to look up if daffodils are toxic, and the answer is yes! But it’s the bulbs. The example was a kid who ate some leaves and was nauseous for a few hours. However, I distinctly remember the lecture on florist flowers and pesticides. This was the 80s, so people had to just go on their knowledge, not looking things up and finding the most alarmist site as the first result.

    TLDR; The rota is stupid and racist, Kate is horrible, and all florist flowers are dangerous to eat, because they drench them in pesticides to make sure they are flawless.

  16. FancyPants says:

    I don’t have kids so I probably have this wrong, but Charlotte was not a baby any more. It seems to me like she would be at least at the point where she realizes flowers are not food. She looked to be at an age where she doesn’t just put everything in her mouth, but what do I know. This story seems to accidentally portray her as an idiot.

  17. Kittenmom says:

    I remember seeing this story on a tabloid rag when it came out. That is the moment that I started really side-eyeing W & K. It seemed quite obvious that they were trying to set Meghan up as a threat to the poor, innocent, white princess.

  18. L4Frimaire says:

    I remember this ridiculous article and thought are they serious? They really hate Meghan to print this nonsense. In the Netflix documentary, David Olusuga made a comment on all these types of articles. He said, to paraphrase, a ridiculous attack/accusation is still an attack and it still makes a negative impact. Meghan was constantly bombarded with stories like these, showing the most mundane thing had some sinister or bad intent behind it. Also using the children, particularly Charlotte, this way is starting to happen more. It makes me think if they were still there the Sussex children would be prime targets of press attacks.

  19. QuiteContrary says:

    I’m glad Harry is dismantling these insane and petty lies. It’s the only way to illuminate — and then destroy — the wider narrative.

  20. Rachel says:

    All I’m going to say is Charlotte is absolutely adorable.

  21. Jaded says:

    So if Charlotte accidently had one lily of the valley petal fall into her mouth she’d immediately die? True story — I once had a cat, Basil, who never went outside but my then partner stupidly let him out one day, against my explicit orders to keep him inside, when I wasn’t there. He got into some lily of the valley in the garden and almost immediately started vomiting. I got home shortly thereafter, he confessed to letting Basil outside, so I rushed him to the vet. He would have died but I got him there in time and after a night at the vet’s he came home all better. The point is, he was an 8 lb cat who ate a shit-load of the stuff but he survived.

    When will these GD tabloid bottom-feeders stop…

  22. Nic919 says:

    This story was one of many which formed part of the micro aggressions against Meghan. In isolation it might seem as silly and not a big deal, but there hundreds of negative stories about Meghan every week in the UK.

  23. Malificent says:

    Half of the flowers in any given garden are poisonous to some degree or another. Which means that there are millions of brides around the world committing attempted mass murder on their bridesmaids and flower girls.

  24. Mimi says:

    They all look so beautiful. I remember that day and how happy everyone was.