Tominey: Duchess Meghan is probably back on Instagram, to make money!

The Duchess of Sussex hasn’t been seen in public since the Ripple of Hope Awards on December 6th. She hasn’t given any interviews in months, not since her promotion for her podcast, Archetypes. Meghan did not participate in her husband’s book promotion, because that’s not the way book promotion works – John Grisham’s wife isn’t sitting beside him for all of his interviews and appearances either. All of this to say, the British media is absolutely desperate for news about Meghan. They’re so desperate, they’re going through old blog posts on The Tig, and trying to hype Samantha Markle’s sad lawsuit. Enter Camilla Tominey at the Telegraph. Tominey has a new article called “Meghan is reinventing herself – and will be laughing all the way to the bank.” It’s about how Tominey thinks Meghan is making money moves behind-the-scenes and Meghan is maybe coming back to Instagram.

Tominey thinks Meghan is already back on Instagram: For months now, mystery has surrounded what appears to be the Duchess of Sussex’s new Instagram page. Last summer, a new @Meghan handle appeared on the social media site, accompanied by a previously unseen childhood photograph of the mother of two…Yet with no one other than a celebrity able to secure a handle on first-name terms, it was assumed that @Meghan would be the vehicle through which the social media-savvy Duchess relaunched her online persona. After Meghan fans began flocking to follow the page, its profile picture was changed to a pink dahlia – the symbol adopted by members of Harry and Meghan’s “Sussex Squad” of online devotees. (The emoji is a nod to Meghan’s mother Doria still referring to her daughter by her childhood nickname, “flower”). No posts and just 195 followers later, however, and the Duchess’s re-emergence on the social media scene appears to have stalled. But why?

What’s next for Meghan: So what is the next stage of the Duchess’s own journey? The appointment of a Hollywood venture capitalist who is famed for making millions of dollars for celebrities would appear to hold the clue. Adam Lilling founded Plus Capital in 2012, which says it aims to partner “the world’s top influencers – those who can affect more change in a day than most can in a lifetime – with the best entrepreneurs and operators in the world”. The Sussexes have been working with Mr Lilling for some time, having been introduced to him by mutual friend Ellen DeGeneres, a US television host, who is said to have worked with him “forever”.

Another important contact? It comes as Meghan has also been linked to Gordon Getty, following unconfirmed reports the pair were spotted having lunch together. The San Francisco billionaire is the scion of the late J Paul Getty, whose oil fortune made his family among the richest in US history. So while she may have taken a step back from the spotlight, behind the scenes, Meghan appears to once again be on manoeuvres.

Tominey quotes Tom Bower: According to Tom Bower, author of Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors, both potentially lucrative alliances suggest the Duchess is “building up to something big”. He told GB News: “The question is, how will she make a lot of money in a short period of time in the end to make sure that she doesn’t need always to parade herself as the victim of the royal family? She’s always looking for other business opportunities. What’s interesting is the people she goes to. Who is going to maximise Meghan’s popularity, who’s going to make her really big and very rich? She’s very shrewd and clever in that. She’s always looking for opportunities and for people who can help her.”

[From The Telegraph]

Tominey then suggests that Meghan is about to relaunch herself on Instagram where she’ll start doing spon-con and earning millions of dollars…? Tominey also claims that Meghan will totally write her own memoir, and that Meghan is perhaps too busy to come with Harry to the coronation. Basically, it’s a whole lotta nothing much, and I doubt that’s really Meghan’s IG handle too. The real story is: Meghan hasn’t been seen for two-and-a-half months and the British media is desperate for any kind of Sussex content. Another part of the story is that the jig is up on the British media’s stupid games – they look like what they are, a group of vindictive, abusive harassers obsessed with an American woman who moved back to America three years ago.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

93 Responses to “Tominey: Duchess Meghan is probably back on Instagram, to make money!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. SomeChick says:

    this is wild, even for Clownmilla. it’s a speculation on top of a fantasy.

    • ikr. The mental gymnastics they go through to make fetch happen.

    • Geegee says:

      Are there not any news stories they can put in their news papers?

      • usavgjoe says:

        If they can’t drag HM, they will have to talk about the economic things plaguing the UK citizens — which are many. Or Charles, Willie and the British parliament being cozy with Oligarchs, thus Vlad.

    • Debbie says:

      Oh my God. To go from what “appears to be” the Duchess of Sussexes’ social media account to the Duchess’s “reemergence” on social media — in the SAME PARAGRAPH, no less is just such a leap. Did she not attend journalism school?

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        @Debbie, I don’t believe Tominey has a degree in journalism. The majority of RR’s/”royal experts” do not have a degree in journalism. (H3ll, I’ll say, the majority of people in UK tabloid media do not have a degree in journalism). They might have a degree in English, History or Lying for a Living. In the immortal words of CT herself,..”This might not be true but is certainly believable.”. (referencing another article she wrote about the BBC that was a lie)

        TwoSourceTominey is including ‘unconfirmed reports’ that Meghan met with Getty. Could be wrong, those ‘unconfirmed reports’ are coming from Lady C & derangers. Another water board story. LOL. CT is considered an Associate Editor of the Telegraph. That title definitely means something else in the BM. My local paper’s Associate Editor does fact checking. Every now an then something comes up where they have to clarify something. Usually, due to someone having a similar name and that person is requesting the clarification.

    • westcoastgal says:

      While she uses Meghan’s name to pay her bills, such a bottom feeder.

      • kirk says:

        Re: people using “Meghan’s name to pay [their] bills,” I blanched to see Mary Beard, of all people, ragging on H-M in The Times for excessive interviews about the royal family. Huh? Lowered my opinion of her for taking such an easy cheap shot.

      • Jojo says:

        I noticed the Mary Beard thing too. It really stood out as unusual, not a person I’d have expected to pile on. But then again Judi Dench was someone I’d always admired until she showed her true colours and questionable leanings.

  2. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Meghan might return to Insta, but not with spon-con, Tominey, you dolt. I can’t wait for her to start her own lifestyle brand or home improvement channel/site. That would be her lane, with eco-friendly products and socially conscious, sustainable earth-friendly construction or improvements.

    • Chloe says:

      Meghans role of suits was already enough to sustain her for the rest of her life even if she never took another acting gig after that. Do they actually think she now has to become some sort of influencer to maintain her lifestyle? I cackled. This piece is unhinged even for CT.

      If Meghan does come back to instagram, and I don’t think that is very likely, it will probably be under her old handle.

      • Weetzie says:

        Her role on Suits didn’t pay fuck off money, but I think they’ll be ok now.

      • Chloe says:

        @weetzie: she got paid $50,000 per episode. 7 seasons long. And her lifestyle blog the Tig also made her money. Plus she had multiple corporate deals.

      • Jan90067 says:

        I don’t think a lot of people realize, but residuals from acting (and writing/exec. producing etc) after each contracted viewing. My BIL, who not only wrote, produced, and co-created a show that ran on Disney for 5 yrs, actually got a residual check for 4¢!!!! YES! You read that right.

        While she made good money, and had it invested, apparently well, residuals won’t keep her in designer dresses and suits 😊 That takes sustained income, invested and reinvested wisely, for them to live well on the interest, leaving the principal to work for them.

      • KASalvy says:

        While she made decent money on suits, definitely not enough for FO money. There’s no way in the beginning of the suits when she had maybe 10 minutes scenting she was making 50k an episode. Not until later seasons at least. Plus out of that salary you pull taxes, pay your agent, manager etc. The numbers start to go down.

        That said, it feels like she’s been very smart with her money and they’re not just going to sit back and live off of any inheritance, but continue to work. However they make their money, good on them.

      • Snuffles says:

        It depends on the show. Suits is HUGE overseas. I think it’s a safe bet she’s getting pretty decent residual checks.

      • Jaded says:

        Meghan’s Spotify deal is the big money and she’s invested wisely. She doesn’t need FO money, she already has it and more coming in. She now has LMTFA money (leave me the f*ck alone).

      • Boxy Lady says:

        I am also skeptical about being able to rely on residuals. Pamela Anderson’s son very recently said that Pamela only gets about $4000 in residuals *per year* from Baywatch. And that’s even with Baywatch being on a huge streaming platform, Amazon, and the show being a huge hit worldwide.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Is there any hope of Suits being replayed on Netflix? Woud love for that deal. Unless, I missed it in my search. Would completely binge watch it.

      • Norvell says:

        Via, you can purchase a DVD set of the T.V. series, Suits, Seasons 1-7 (all seasons) for $89.99.

    • JOJO says:

      @AGREATRECKONING I’m currently doing just that on UK Netflix lol. I never originally watched past season 4 or 5 for some reason (probably work). So, now I’m not as busy & rushed in life I’ve gone back to the beginning & started again. It’s just as good as I remember it. Up to season 3 so far.

  3. Brassy Rebel says:

    Are these people even aware that Meghan was a self made millionaire before she ever met Harry? Or do they just choose to ignore that fact? She absolutely knows how to make money without exploiting her royal connections. And she is doing it.

    • Janice Hill says:

      And some have sneered at the idea that she gave up her career with the gaslight that she was a 2-bit actress with not much of a career to give up. It’s so insulting to women everywhere.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      @Brassy Rebel, they are absolutely aware that Meghan is a self made millionaire before she met Harry. Those MFers were looking her up as soon as they found out she was dating Harry.
      Those same MFers knew Meghan wasn’t just an actress. They knew she was an intelligent, charity driven activist, philanthropist and an exceptional speaker.

      Those same MFers knew that she was more intelligent then them. Meghan was a threat to the whole dynamic of the “invisible contract”. Harry fell in love with and married someone who had more than a clue. He married someone who you want to be your phone in a friend. There’s a reason why the BM acts all funny when it comes to Meghan’s Northwestern U grades. They know her grades eclipsed the others.

      Meghan is working. Hard to say the same about the Others.

  4. Beach Dreams says:

    They’re so mad that she didn’t give them anything during the promo cycle for Spare and continues to give them nothing in light of all the negative stories (big and small) about the RF.

  5. MSTJ says:

    IIRC Meghan said in the docu series, 2023 is her year of peace. She is living a peaceful life in her corner of the world this year. The tabloids can keep looking back but she is peacefully ☮️ looking forward.

  6. equality says:

    I see all kinds of people on Instagram with a one-name handle. What is this woman babbling about? If Meghan were going to use Instagram as an influencer then she would have to make it clear that was her account. I don’t think anyone would advise her to open an anonymous account to make money. How stupid and desperate can this writer sound?

    • Mary Pester says:

      Oh please, what is it with these people. I’m beginning to think that Megan is their drug of choice! They can’t go an hour without trying to out think themselves!! I wouldn’t put it past this stupid woman to have been the one who set up the Instagram account in the name of meghan to try and get a reaction or denial from meghan herself!! And as for Tom (the idiot Bower). I notice he stopped promoting his book just as quickly as his publishers STOPPED promoting the book, when all the people (celebrities) he mentioned in it came out and called him out on the lies in it. So much so that he had to admit he didn’t actually speak to the named celebrities, just people who knew them. So in other words 3rd hand gossip!, yeah, that’s how good he is. Megan does not need to make money. She and Harry have enough to live on AND use it to support others. But WAIT, what happened to all the “they are taking money from the UK and useing the Royal family for money? Now they say Megan is meeting with the big guns, writing her own book, setting up Instagram accounts and goodness knows what else. So it’s Megan never sleeps, meghan never eats, Megan never sees her husband, meghan never sees her children. Because according to these cockwombles, she has so much going on, she would never have time for her family. Good god do these idiots never read what they write

      • kirk says:

        Mary – Didn’t Tom Bower also do a hatchet job on Jeremy Corbyn, convincing at least some Brits that Corbyn is an anti-Semite? (Pretty sure I heard Karen Oxborne spouting that.) Is that why Labour Party seems so defanged and weirdly influenced by Keir Starmer?

      • Jaded says:

        Cockwombles! I love it!

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        @kirk, YES! It is widely believed Bower was paid by the BM/Tories to write that book about Corbyn. The same people who’ve claimed him(Bower) to be an “investigative journalist”. Though there is little evidence of any ‘investigative journalism’ on his part considering most of his writings/words come from Daily Maily/BM tabloid stories. Peter Oborne. Did a great expose on Bower-with facts. Not rumors.

        LOL. Meghan is maneuvering to earn money! WTF jump the shark is this insidious behavior! Quelle horreur! Who does she think she is wanting to earn money for her family?! Meghan, the brazen hussy, does not understand that earning money is bad! How wrong is that shite?! It’s more respectable to inherit a Duchy you’ve done nothing for and , quite frankly, give two sh*ts about.

    • Peggy Campbell says:

      I still can’t believe anyone pays Tominey good money to write such dribble. With any other legitimate news organization she would be person non grata because of the many lies she has told. She is the most inaccurate, teller of tales, that side of the Atlantic.

    • likethedirection says:

      A “regular” (non-celeb) person even wrote an article recently about being @josh on Instagram!!

  7. Talie says:

    At the end of the day, the Sussexes just haven’t behaved the way they thought they would…like showing up to every red carpet and getting pap’d all the time. They mostly stay underground unless they are promoting.

    Although I wouldn’t be surprised if she was expecting again. I just had a feeling.

    • Julia K says:

      No more babies; Harry said 2 and done. Meghan has put her body through 3 pregnancies in 3 years so I really believe she has said enough.

    • Jaded says:

      Let’s not start with the bump-watch nonsense. They clearly said 2 kids. The miscarriage must have been hell and heart-breaking, but they have two beautiful kids now. That’s enough.

  8. Dee(2) says:

    They make it sound so nefarious that people have to earn money for a living. If she’s having business lunches and making contracts so that she can earn money that would make her like literally billions of others on this rock. It kills them that they can’t demand they make appearance’s or show their kids like they can with the others, so they make her minding her business out to be something shady.

    • Snuffles says:

      To them, it absolutely IS the worst thing they can do. It means they can be independent, wealthy, reach the public on their term and never have to fuck with the British tabloids ever again.

      • Kingston says:

        Dont forget that H said something like: if we (i:e H&M) cant ‘fight’ the shidtrags, then who can?

        And for that, they need lots and lots of money. THAT’S why the shidtrags and the shidteaters that work for them, are so pressed that H&M are on their way to making billions!

      • Christine says:

        I think the extent of the British media’s failure to correctly anticipate anything about Harry and Meghan has to be sinking in, finally. They fcuked off and lied about Harry and Meghan for years, and now they will never, ever, for the rest of their pathetic lives, get ANY sort of exclusive, from their “own” Prince Harry, who, it turns out, is the only blood royal anyone cares about. Ha. Sit in it and soak.

    • Jais says:

      The word choice is always telling. Bower calls her clever and shrewd, which all carry negative connotations. One could easily just say meghan is intelligent and astute as she makes her money. Nothing wrong with that but they twist it in the telling.

    • CJ says:

      In fairness, If your only job is sucking at the royal teat, the reality of how the working world actually works would be very confusing and hard to grasp. People do work without notifying the press? People running organisations do work without broadcasting their every move? People who really work don’t consider zoom calls a notable event??

      They must be baffled that real companies aren’t run the same way as royal foundations.

    • SadieMae says:

      I think it’s very “How dare she try to make money? She’s a woman, and she’s Black!” They want to keep her in what they see as her “place.” Also, if other people value her enough to pay her for her work, that rather goes against their assertion that she is such an awful person that she has no value (or that her only value was as a pretty woman to stand next to Harry and smile, and that for her to try to do more than that was nasty and egotistical).

      It is kind of funny that these people are so critical of Harry and Meghan earning money. You can just picture the royals sitting in their hordes of jewels – like the dragon Smaug – and whining, “We earned our money the old-fashioned way…we STOLE it!”

  9. C-Shell says:


    Meghan is not on IG. Meghan is not going to do sponcon, not there for sure. After she gave Oprah the Clevr Blends basket, I can’t recall anything else she’s said or done that could fall in that category. Even the advertisers for Archetypes are few and low key, and that’s not money that goes into Meghan’s pockets.

    And quoting Tom Bowels??!! 🤣🤣🤣

  10. Chloe says:

    I wish my mind was as creative as CT and i could just come up fantasies like this.

    Anywho, I actually do hope meghan comes back to instagram soon.

  11. Cathy says:

    Cameltoe: Duchess Meghan is back on Instagram probably to make money, unlike me who can’t…

    There you go, they missed a bit of the quote.

    The person who opened that account must be laughing at the British tabloid press foaming at the mouth thinking Meghan is doing something and THEY don’t know what it is?

  12. Rapunzel says:

    If Meg returns to Instagram, it won’t be sponcon. It will be promoting her own projects, and freely promoting other small (probably black, probably female owned) businesses worthy of her promotion, like Clevr blends.

  13. Snuffles says:

    I will start with my weekly chant “Bring back The Tig! Bring back The Tig”

    If her Spotify podcast hasn’t already demonstrated that people will consume whatever Meghan puts out that has nothing to do with the royals, they’ll learn soon enough.

    I am positively GAGGING for lifestyle content from Meghan! Food, fashion, travel, beauty, home…give it to me PLEASE!!!!

    • Dee Kay says:

      I didn’t watch Suits, and I didn’t read The Tig, but I think if Meghan had never met Harry, I would have eventually heard of her through The Tig. I like smart, charismatic women of color who do lifestyle stuff, who are attuned to where the culture is headed and can help point me there or tell me what’s good. I liked O Magazine for years for this reason (but I think Oprah’s time as a cultural leader/influencer is past). The day would have come when someone would have mentioned The Tig and I would have followed the IG account and would have become a big Meghan fan. I like this version of her and I would have liked that version of her. If somehow, Duchess Meghan could also be The Tig Meghan, that really would be awesome.

  14. MsIam says:

    Are the tabloids planning on spending the next twenty years complaining about how rich the Sussexes are getting? Is that the plan? Sounds like the invisible contract is not working out for the press because they got nothing on the Sussexes. Oh well.

    • Snuffles says:

      They will do it until those Cambridge kids become teens, then the media will harass them.

      • Callypoo says:

        Still a long time to go! But even then whilst the interest is there and of course it will be, this could possibly go on for another 10 to 15 years. If not longer!

  15. Amy Bee says:

    Who’s obsessed with Meghan more Camilla Tominey or Dan Wootton? This piece was unhinged and just made of old speculations from other tabloids. As Kaiser said it’s a sign of the British press’ desperation for any news on Meghan. It was news to me that the Squad had a symbol and it wouldn’t surprise me if Camilla opened that Instagram account herself.

  16. Becks1 says:

    This is so sad and pathetic on Tominey’s part. A whole article about how Meghan might have rejoined IG but no one knows, its a secret IG account or something, and she might be making connections and networking behind the scenes so obviously we should burn her at the stake for the witch she so clearly is. Like, what?

    • Snuffles says:

      The underlying message is “Meghan will continue to pull focus and outshine the royals. Which is the worst thing anyone can do. And the more money she and Harry make, the less likely Harry will ever come home! BURN the beautiful, intelligent, money making WITCH!!”

    • Debbie says:

      @Becks1: You left out “unconfirmed reports” (huh?) of how Meghan might have been spotted lunching with someone wealthy. And @Snuffles: The only focus I can see is coming from Camila T. and the rest of the BM, who could easily be writing about their royal family, the state of their country, and the cost of their coronation.

  17. Jay says:

    Ah yes, everyone knows that old scam:

    1. Make a new instagram account that doesn’t use your full name, certainly don’t make use of the lifestyle branding you had already built at the Tig.
    2. Don’t include any image of yourself that would identify you to your millions of eager fans, keep em guessing.
    3. Don’t post at all.
    4. …profit?

  18. Harper says:

    Again, I’m confused. If I were living in that palatial spread in Montecito with orange trees, those lawns, hummingbirds, that pool, all those bathrooms, I would definitely say I was already rich. What part about Meghan and Harry’s lifestyle says financial instability instead of rich and set for life? The Netflix and Spotify $$$ contracts, the Guinness Book Of World Record royalties, continuing royalties from Suits, Diana’s inheritance. How much more evidence of wealth does this wretch need? Now one thing Meghan will never have enough of is purpose. She loves working towards humanitarian goals and trying to make the world a better place. But that is separate from wealth and on a higher plane than these dodo birds can comprehend.

  19. Athena says:

    Meghan looks young, beautiful and modern in that off the shoulder white dress.

    She’s busy running Archwell and looking after herself, her children, her husband and her home.

  20. B says:

    I enjoyed all of Meghan’s polo looks but the denim short and shirt is a particular favorite of mine. It was so casual yet chic. She does lux California casual sooo well! Going from the Wales BAFTA look to these pics really helped me to understand individual members of the UK’s press obsession with the Sussexes. They get neither style nor substance with the Wales.

    BUT “reporters” like Camilla are a extra level of crazy. At one point she reported on their lawn and whether or not they would be able to water it now and now an imaginary instagram account.

    • molly says:

      Comparing the UK polo photos of Meghan (clutching Archie, alone, and STRESSED) to sunny California polo with a popped collar and a cool drink is really night and day. You can just feel the calm and happy radiating off her now.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        You can. They both look deliciously happy and healthy in Montecito. I wish them nothing but happiness and peace!!

    • kirk says:

      She had to come up with imaginary Instagram account because civil servants at Montecito Water District aren’t taking her calls anymore 😆

  21. one of the marys says:

    “She’s very shrewd and clever in that. She’s always looking for opportunities and for people who can help her.”

    Wow they want to paint her as manipulative and greedy. She’s continuing how she always has. She’s networking, building connections, exploring possibilities etc etc That’s how she got all her projects done in Britain

    • Feeshalori says:

      Yes, she’s networking as any savvy businessperson would do. But of course leave it to these twisted muckrakers to ascribe the negative spin to it. So tell us how you make money, Camila, oh, wait, we already know.

    • Rnot says:

      To a certain type literally anything that she does is bad by definition, because she’s the one doing it. Meghan = bad intentions. That’s all.

  22. OriginalLeigh says:

    The ROTA is so ridiculous. On the rare occasions that Meghan appears in public, they complain that she won’t go away and falsely claim that she previously begged for “privacy.” But when she’s not seen or heard from (which is really most of the time), they start feverishly speculating about what she might be doing and why we haven’t heard from her?! LOL.

  23. Blue Nails Betty says:

    Dear, British Media,

    I’m going to save you some time and effort: Meghan Markle, Princess Henry of Windsor, the Duchess of Sussex and Montecito, is most definitely going to make a boatload of money. So much money. Money like y’all will never see in your pathetic lifetimes.

    And she will use that money to enrich her life, her family’s life, and the lives of so many other people.

    Suck on that.

  24. Emily_C says:

    Those in the rota are failures as journalists and failures at fiction. This is a very dumb and boring fanfic. None of them can write, and yet somehow, they make money “writing.” In Spare, Harry gets angry about that — like, this idiot rota person can’t even string sentences together properly! I am also angry about it.

    I feel sorry for whoever’s actually behind the account. Murdoch et al are going to try to ruin her life if they find out who she is.

    • Cece says:

      It’s likely a reserved account. I doubt a handle like @ Meghan was never used before, it’s so hard to secure such handles! From what I’ve heard, people do create handles like that and sell them to those who want it. If Meghan is intending to get back on Instagram, it’s likely she would have to buy that or use her old handle (which I don’t think she would, because i don’t think she would keep her maiden name)

  25. Well Wisher says:

    Camilla Tominey had an assignment to write an opinion item pertaining to recent actitivies from/of Meghan.

    She does not have any recent material on the subject matter, she had no access.

    What to do ??

    She wrote an article of her personal dreams and aspirations, Camilla chose transference.

    This is a tad better than spreading misinformation e.g. the late Mr Mandala’s assertions, which in due course were exposed as untruths.

  26. L4Frimaire says:

    This article sounds crazy. Like just out there made up hater fan fiction. This sounds a lot like whet they were saying when the Sussexes first left, that they were going to be influencers because they met this or that person. If for some reason Meghsn did have an instagram account, it would probably be private and if it wasn’t, it would be about Archewell. I just don’t see the point of this article. They haven’t seen Meghan, can’t goad her into appearing for their amusement and denigration so she must be plotting to rake in billions or something. They really have tried to turn her into a cartoon villain. Meanwhile, Archewell is offering grants, and Invictus Düsseldorf is ramping up.

  27. Purley Pot says:

    All I have to say is this: “Meghan, go get your cash.”

  28. Thelma says:

    Camilla Tominey is just disgusting. WHY OH WHY is she so obsessed with Meghan? Get a life!

  29. QuiteContrary says:

    I find the obsession with Meghan making money particularly confusing, as even Charles apparently expected her to pay her own way.

    So she’s doing that, as she always has done, and now there’s something noteworthy about that?

    On another note, THAT — Meghan at the Ripple of Hope Awards — is how you accessorize with black with a white evening dress.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      Yes!! Meghan is doing her work that she chooses wisely. Though I do hope that she continues Archetypes as it was enlightening as well as empowering.

      Every time we are fortunate to see Meghan out, she always looks fabulous!!! She has the California look and her styling is perfection!! Meghan never looks poorly styled even while watching polo.

    • Christine says:

      This is such a good point, QuiteContrary!

      Chuck: I am way too poor to pay for Meghan, she should just keep working as an actress while also being a full time royal!

      British media: OH MY GOD!! Meghan is so trashy, and who does she think wants to hear anything from her anyway?

      Thinking People on Earth: *raises hand*

  30. Mary Pester says:

    KIRK, yes your right he did, he’s also done one on Richard Branson and others, BUT he couches them in so much legalise that people don’t have a hope in hell of being able to sue. I think that’s why so many people spoke out against him with his book “revenge” what sort of idiot writes a book called revenge, then goes on national television saying “, he wants the book to bring her down” when all it did was show the world what he is really like

    • kirk says:

      IIRC the reason people were calling out Bowers on Revenge was for the straight up provable lies, followed by callouts on misreporting.

  31. Pam says:

    I love the way they try to paint her as some opportunistic harpy for simply taking care of business. They’re getting JACK for security money, and besides that they are self-supporting. They’re not living in some enormous estate on Charle’s dime whilst evading the FBI, like SOME people we could name. They’re making their own money, and even my local yarn shop has a presence on Instagram…businesses DO that sort of thing.

  32. blunt talker says:

    Since KIng Charles stated he could not afford to pay for Meghan when she married into the family-then all bets are off-What Harry and Meghan decide to do to make money is because Charles could not take care of Harry’s wife and children- I truly admire the Sussexes grit and stamina to forth in life and make their own way.God bless them.

    • THERoyalExpert says:

      “…because Charles could not take care of Harry’s wife and children”.

      It’s because Charles WOULD not take care of Harry’s wife and children. Of course he could have done it but he didn’t because William didn’t want him to do it. It was yet another way that William, via his father (who is meek in the face of William’s temper) sought to control Harry’s choices.

      I do believe that William is incandescent with rage because he knows Harry won’t be coming back and all their scheming to diminish Meghan and their (now) children has blown up in their collective faces.

    • JOJO says:

      Exactly. Well said.

      If ever a couple deserved peace, success & happiness it’s these two kind hearted people.

      Some people just can’t bear it when they come across genuine goodness in others because deep down they recognise they are the exact opposite. Rather than face that truth they attack & try to destroy what makes them feel uncomfortable in their own skins.

      Harry & Meghan have unfortunately been beset by people like this. People from inside both their families, Tominey & Bower media types, Clarkson & Morgan obsessive/unhinged types to out & out racists that populate the nastier regions of the internet.

      My point of view is that I would much prefer to encourage a world full of women like Meghan rather than a world full of women like Tominey. I know who most intelligent people would choose as a role model for a young daughter, sister or niece.

  33. blunt talker says:

    PS-Dr. Shola in the UK has received a very life threatening letter -it is very nasty and fears for her and her family’s safety is really heightened-if anybody tells me that the UK is not racist-I will say they are racist it is a part of their dna with evil blood flowing through their veins-now I know how Harry felt and what has worried the Sussexes about returning to the UK-that country is turning in to a godless mess of their own making. please pray for the doctor and her family’s safety.