Prince Louis’s fifth birthday portraits were taken by someone other than Kate

Prince Louis of Wales turned five years old on Sunday, April 23rd. For some reason, I always forget that he has an April birthday – it feels like he has a May birthday, alongside his sister Charlotte. Charlotte and Louis have the same sign, are Tauruses. Prince George is a Cancer (just on the cusp of Leo), and Prince William is a Gemini, just on the cusp of Cancer. Sorry for that zodiac conversation, I only just realized that both Charlotte and Louis fell under the sign of Taurus. There’s a lot going on in that family astrologically. Kate is a Capricorn. I’d love a deeper dive into how their signs play out within the family.

Anyway, to celebrate Louis’s birthday, Kensington Palace released new birthday portraits. Traditionally, the Princess of Wales takes her kids’ birthday photos herself and the pics are usually okay – Kate’s not a great photographer, but I don’t judge her for wanting to do her kids’ photos herself. This year, however, Kate hired photographer Millie Pilkington to do Louis’s photos. I looked at Pilkington’s Instagram – she mainly does portraits of kids and domestic settings. I’m surprised that Kate branched out like this – usually, if she hires a photographer, it’s one of the Rota photographers with some connection to her office. I wonder if she simply heard about Pilkington or looked through the woman’s Instagram.

I also find it strange that Kate is in one of Louis’s birthday photos. I wonder what that’s about? Why do we need to see her wiglet again?? I can f–king see it too. In any case, Louis looks cute. I’ve always thought that all three kids take after the Middleton side of the family more than the Windsor side, but Louis is the one who got Kate’s whole face.

Photos courtesy of Millie Pilkington for Kensington Palace.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

164 Responses to “Prince Louis’s fifth birthday portraits were taken by someone other than Kate”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Emily says:

    Will is a Cancer and (apologies to Cancer men) it checks out.

    • AnneL says:

      LOL, my husband and father are both Cancers. Similar in some ways but different in others. Both lovely men who actually have very long fuses, unlike William who is always ready to blow a gasket.

      • Mjane says:

        It’s so strange that we’ve seen Charles and Harry pop their tops in public but it’s Will’s temper everyone on this board likes to talk about

      • Nick G says:

        I am a Cancerian and I love Cancer men because they’re so nurturing and sensitive. But the shadow side has certainly taken over with this one. Fun fact: for all their compassion, Cancerians are the sign most likely to be murderers ☠️ ☠️

      • Lux says:

        @Mjane, because he’s literally been described as having a bad temper and “incandescent with rage” by his rota friends more times than Charles and Harry have “popped off in public” combined?

      • Lady D says:

        Agree, Lux. It’s because his temper is horrifying and adversely affecting everyone in his sphere. Truthfully, the talk needs to be louder.

      • Alice says:

        Sun signs are not who people are and astrology, real astrology, is so different from newspaper signs. Who we are intimately would be Moon, Venus, for men, Mars, their placement by sign and house and any affliction to any of them. Who we are in society is our Ascendant and again, its ruler by sign and house, afflictions to it etc. It’s not an easy thing.

      • ML says:

        Annel and Nick G, There are lots of decent Cancerians—William is a jerk because he’s been raised as someone special who can do no wrong. Whatever he does gets covered up if necessary: that’s what’s made him a raging bully. Not his birthday.

    • Emily says:

      100% checks out. And with that temper, I wonder if he has an Aries Mars.

      • Ameerah M says:

        More like an Aries Mercury

      • Shay says:

        Will is a Cancer sun/Cancer moon/Sagittarius rising. No Mars in Aries (his is in Libra), but he does have Jupiter in Scorpio, and since Jupiter rules his chart (bc it rules Sagittarius, his rising sign), those Scorpio aspects of his personality are pretty pronounced in his personality. If anything, his chart suggests he’s extremely emotional and impulsive, but also prefers to be pretty indirect (and potentially manipulative) about how he approaches conflict.

      • Ameerah M says:

        I wondered if he had some Scorpio in his chart. This makes SO much sense!

      • Cairidh says:

        I read Williams chart once. Every sign/position said lazy.

      • Harper says:

        I thought Willy’s astrological chart was famous for saying he wouldn’t make it to the throne?

      • Feeshalori says:

        I saw a chart years ago that claimed the same thing about William.

      • Alice says:

        His Mars in Libra is afflicted and in bad mood. Enough said.

      • Elizabeth Phillips says:

        Alice is right. Rising is who you appear to be, Sun is who you are, Moon is who you REALLY are.

      • Yesgirl says:

        Aries get bad raps for being a fire sign but I think Cancer (if unbalanced), Scorpio, Gemini and Sags are the hot tempered ones.

      • BearToy says:

        Does anyone have any insight in that Libra stellium? Very curious about Mars being “in a bad mood”!

    • JanetDR says:

      My brother has the same birthday, different year.He is also frequently incandescent with rage. Although I think that got worse after a traumatic brain injury, which William also had.

    • notasugarhere says:

      Yes William’s a Cancer man, as was Duke of Windsor. Explains a lot about their similiarities.

    • emberly says:

      Not True. . The last time I visited New Orleans, I inquired for some clarity. People born on this date could emotionally Gemini or Cancer.
      William is a Cancer, because he’s too lazy to balance the other

  2. girl_ninja says:

    She really wanted to be in these photos huh? I’m guessing because she still feels embarrassed by how the poor kid reacted to her at the Jubbly. She wants to show a bond with her youngest baby. She’s something else Buttons is.

    • SarahCS says:

      I also wondered if now that it seems unlikely she’ll get another one she’s determined to insert herself into the narrative as much as possible with the three she has.

      Look at MEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • StellainNH says:

        I didn”t realize that Louis was born on Saint George Day–the patron Saint of England.

    • Ray says:

      You hit the nail with the hammer🔨. I couldn’t say it any better. Cute kid though!!

    • PrincessOfWaffles says:

      She wanted to be in the pic because the Press was saying that her amateur photography was taking away opportunity from talent photographers who could use good promotion by taking pics of her kids instead of her, which is not contributing. That’s probably why it’s not a Royal rota photog and why she must be in. They get so scared of the press.

    • Becks1 says:

      to me its just about Kate needing to center herself in these kinds of pictures at all times. If she’s not taking the picture and getting over the top praise for that, then she’s damn well going to be in it.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Its the same when they are with her at engagements she centre’s herself in every shot/situation with them – she gets in their faces to make sure she’s in the photos and to give the paps/stans something to crow about.

        She really is a narc – EVERYTHING has to be centred on her.

      • Nic919 says:

        I would agree with this. She’s always making every event about herself.

      • AnnaKist says:

        I also agree. She is really obvious, too. She gets in the centre with one of the kids. And points at something that we can’t see, that focusses the child’s attention, long enough for the camera to snap, and to avoid any naughtiness from that child This gives her prime position and also gives the impression that she is really engaged with the child. Watch the pointing finger!

      • notasugarhere says:

        It is always all about Kate, that’s the only way she’ll have it.

      • Jais says:

        I mean that balcony appearance where she centered herself with the queen and pushed William out of frame was something else. Think she was wearing magenta. If she wasn’t such a mean girl, I’d almost appreciate the brazen hustle. She is not playing around when the cameras come out. Also, saw this oldie but goodie the other day. When Kate freezes in surprise for the cameras during a bike race but everyone is watching the race in the other direction. Hopefully the link works.
        https://twitter.com/megxharry/status/1221989788670222337?s=46&t=Y0OeEXif8mMcMgPE2AExEQ

      • Christine says:

        I’m convinced this is more copykeening. Archie got adorably wheeled on a suitcase by Harry on the Netflix series, now Kitty needs to prove her kids get lovingly pushed on wheeled apparatuses (apparati?) too.

      • Debbie says:

        I must say that the phrase, “The Duchesse of Cambridge came flawlessly to the Holocaust Museum” bears some thinking about. And the footage of Kate clearly posing for the cameras is odd and desperate behavior.

      • Nic919 says:

        That video clip of kate doing a fake shock pose while Harry and William and the rest of the crowd are actually looking at the cyclists in the other direction really confirms how fake Kate is for the camera.

      • Just me says:

        @Nic919
        It’s also super weird!

    • FHMom says:

      Yes. She is still embarrassed. It’s stupid to have her in the photo. I mean, he isnt smiling at her even though she is smiling at him. Unless she feels he needs her supervision?

    • Jacqueline says:

      And Harry is a Virgo. So many earth signs in the s royal family. The queen was also a Taurus

      • Feeshalori says:

        And Charles’ moon is in Taurus with his sun in Scorpio.
        Happy birthday to Louis, he is an adorable little guy.

    • The Recluse says:

      Yep, she wanted it documented that, yes, she is too a hands on mum, so there.

    • Rackel says:

      At Christina. I knew there was an angle. I’m looking at this picture and couldn’t believe she let Louis take a picture in dirt.

      • Nic919 says:

        Most parents who actually have to clean their kids and not send them to the nanny would never have their kid sit in a pile of grass and weeds. That likely stains the shorts too. But she’s wearing a pristine white striped sweater so it’s clear she’s never done yard work in her life.

    • ML says:

      This also came across as “advertising” that she has a good bond (and is therefore a good mother) with Louis after the Jubbly to me.

  3. Brit says:

    I find it funny that the papers barely made a beep about this or Kate and William for that matter. The papers must be really pissed with them.

    • equality says:

      Louis was just seen in the Easter parade also. It’s not so exciting to get photos of the Wales children because they are put out so often.

      • Jojo says:

        It’s a lovely picture and Louis looks suitably cute and very happy in the wheelbarrow. No matter what I think about their parents I genuinely wish the three Wales children well. Knowing all we do about the wider royal family and what that institution does to those embroiled in the system they will not all fare well as they grow up and that is just very sad.

    • Tacky says:

      We’ve learned from Harry how the press regards the “spare.”

      • notasugarhere says:

        Louis isn’t the spare, Charlotte is. Louis is Edward and will continue to be ignored most of his life. George’s ire, and that of the tabloids, will be directed at Charlotte not Louis.

      • "Lady D says:

        “will continue to be ignored most of his life.” Only if he’s really lucky. I have the bad feeling that he is going to be William’s scapegoat/look at what a devoted father I am, target. That or just use him as George’s scapegoat.

      • Jais says:

        Yeah, I know that charlotte is technically the spare but really both of those kids are going to be used as scapegoats at various times if need be.

      • Lauren says:

        Louis is the spare boy. Charlotte can be protected because she can be their perfect princess, who of course takes after her grandmother Diana. Louis, though, is another prince and can be used to make his fellow but senior prince brother look good. As a boy, hell be seen more as a competition.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Charlotte won’t be protected. From the moment she was born her parents publicly forced the ‘she’s a little lady’ stereotype on her. When she acts out against that, we’ve seen how Kate publicly yanks her around and Charlotte openly shows her dislike of Mummy Dearests machinations.

        What W&K have set her up as George’s spare, George will resent her freedom like William resents Harry’s freedom, and William will egg him on. And no, the press isn’t going to skip over criticizing a young princess in order to go after this next generation’s Edward.

      • Nic919 says:

        The tabloid press is misogynistic before anything so Charlotte will be treated worse than Louis. Look at how the York sisters were treated and multiply that.

    • Beach Dreams says:

      And the two that did coincidentally employ the same two RRs that coordinated the nearly identical “Meghan leaked the story about her exchange with Charles” tweet over the weekend.

  4. Ameerah M says:

    I hate to correct Kaiser but WIlliam is solidly a Cancer. Gemini ends on June 20th. WE GEMINIS DO NOT CLAIM HIM. His energy is pure Cancer-ian.

    • C-Shell says:

      Exactly! I am a Gemini on the cusp of Cancer (June 19), and I don’t recognize any commonality with the rage monster whatsoever. *shudder*

    • Bren says:

      July Cancerians don’t claim him either.

    • AnneL says:

      What’s with the Cancer hate? My husband and father are both Cancers, born in July. My father was not a rage monster at all and neither is my husband. Both very patient and people, actually.

      I do think astrology is fun and interesting, but I not going to pigeon-hole someone based on whatever day they happened to be born.

      • Ameerah M says:

        Literally nothing I said was hateful. All signs have positive and negative traits so I don’t get why you would take what I said personally. William leans heavily on the negative traits of Cancer. PS – I studied astrology for years. I wasn’t pigeon-holing anyone. I was simply stating facts.

      • Kelsey says:

        Cancers are perpetual victims. Sorry, you asked. ;D

      • Ameerah M says:

        I mean… FACTS. LOL.

      • ScorpioMoon says:

        Unless you’re a fellow water sign or an earth sign (or have a prominent water/earth placement in your big 3), Cancers can be quite frustrating honestly. They’re known for being caring homebodies, sure, but on the flip side, Cancers can also be extremely passive aggressive and terrible at communicating calmly when there is a conflict, and yet they hold onto grudges for years over the smallest slights (but often won’t communicate clearly why or what upset them in the first place). Even with a water moon, as a fire sign sun and mars, I personally find it can be aggravating to deal with Cancers for these reasons, and their perpetual “I’m the victim” status gets draining over time.

    • HeatherC says:

      As a fellow Gemini, I second this. We have voted William off our chart.

    • ScorpioMoon says:

      Agree, cusps aren’t real. I was born on the Cancer/Leo cusp and was told growing up that it meant both were my sun sign. Fast forward years later, I work with a real astrologer, and they say cusps aren’t real, I’m just a Leo sun, but because I have a Scorpio moon, that was probably the water influence that relatives picked up on when I was a kid.

      • Feeshalori says:

        Birth times are always crucial factors in astrology charts. Just a minute over or under will land you in a preceding or following sign. I’m also a Scorpio moon with my rising sign in Leo and birth sign Taurus so l find I’m all over the map when it comes to emotions and personality.

      • TeamMeg says:

        “Cusps aren’t real” LOL. Most astrologers I know believe that at the end of a sign, the influence of the next is bleeding in. At the beginning of a sign, the power of the new sign is at its height, and the previous sign is no longer influential.

      • Feeshalori says:

        My mom was born on November 22 and because she had a homebirth and the midwife never recorded the birth time, we never knew if she was a Scorpio or Sagittarius. But, oh boy, she definitely exhibited the traits of both signs and maybe more of the Scorpio, because it was the beginning of a new sign.

    • OriginalCee says:

      I’m a Cancer and I don’t claim him either.

    • TeamMeg says:

      It depends on the year what day each sign ends and the next begins. It’s not always June 20th for the Gemini/Cancer cusp.

    • detritus says:

      My brother is a Gemini, and he’s fiercely loyal and very chill. I see nothing of that so far in Willy.

    • ML says:

      The earlier in the day (4 a.m., for instance) and the further East (like Australia or Korea) you’re born, the chance that you are a Gemini on June 21 increases depending on the year. If PW had been born in Australia on 21 June 1982, there is no way he could have been a Cancer. He would have been a Gemini. PW happens to have been born after 9 in the evening (almost 3 hours after the sun switched star signs). Donald Trump is, for instance, a man-baby Gemini who shares some similarities with PW. Both of them have narcissistic tendencies, rage, and are never corrected when they’re wrong.

  5. equality says:

    Kate is distracting in the picture. I hate those photos where everything else is blurry, especially other people, especially someone in the foreground.

    • harpervalleypta says:

      I think it’s distracting because Kate isn’t looking at Louis, but she’s also not looking at whatever Louis is looking at. Nor is she looking forward.

      The eyelines are all wrong. Kate needed to give a profile so she’s off looking in some weird direction.

  6. C-Shell says:

    Good photographic quality, very cute, very photogenic little guy. I’m a little eeeked out at sitting that child on a pile of weeds in an ancient wheelbarrow, but 🤷‍♀️

    • Lauren42 says:

      I’m the same way! I grew up in the Northeast U.S. and it’s tick central and that was my very first thought… What if there’s ticks in there?? Because I can tell you that if I sat on a pile of freshly cut grass/weeds/whatever from the yard, I would have several ticks within what feels like minutes.

      • ThatsNotOkay says:

        I’m sure those are hand-picked, prime leaves, sourced from the finest forests occupied only by the purest animals with the most delicate, dainty furs inhospitable to ticks or other parasites, and used as high-class rugs in the artistocratickest of homes.

        ETA: I take that back. The boy’s sitting in salad, like that ANTM photo shoot when they went to Greece and posed in…you guess it…Greek salads complete with salad dressing. I hate this timeline.

      • LittlePenguin says:

        The weeds thing has me scratching my head as well. I’m a gardener and have worked on my grandparents farm when they had it in the garden and no one was ever allowed in the weed filled wheel barrow because of bugs, thorns, It’s an odd choice, but again, as @ThatsNotOkay said, they were likely aristocratic, artisianal weeds.

    • BeanieBean says:

      It’s also just a weird setup, for the photo only. A kid is more likely to want a ride in an empty wheelbarrow, not one that’s full of clippings. It’s not remotely the same as jumping on a pile of leaves.

      • ML says:

        Definitely a cute kid! Hate the shorts , but love his sweater. Maybe he got a ride on the weeds, because they act as cushioning? (In the NLs, it’s somewhat common to ride on the metal part over the back wheel of your boyfriend’s bike. For the not-Dutch, this is seriously uncomfortable over bricks! I used a jacket as padding.) otherwise, I agree, the weeds and dirt are an odd choice. The idea of bugs under his behind, especially because Louis is wearing shorts, disturbs me, too.

    • TheOriginalMia says:

      Whew! Okay, not just me.

    • Mira says:

      I think he’s lovely and super cute and has a happy confident smile. Very pretty photos!

  7. Southern Fried says:

    Is she resistant to him growing up? Seems he’s posed and dressed a lot like a toddler. Wonder if he’s treated as such.

    • M says:

      That’s some stupid posh people thing where the boys wear shorts until age 8 or so. It’s very infantilizing for sure.

      • Smices says:

        The Tindall boy is in long pants in that pic with the Queen. And August wears long pants in most of Eugenies pics. This seems like a Kate thing.

      • Becks1 says:

        i know nothing about posh people in England, lol, but if this is a posh-aristo thing, then I’m not surprised that Kate clings to it the way she does while Zara (a granddaughter of the Queen) and Eugenie (ditto) do not. those two do not have anything to prove in terms of being aristos or whatever. Kate does.

    • SquiddusMaximus says:

      Thank you! Came here to post exactly that. Seems like Buttons is eager to pass on the family tradition of cosplaying Victorian. Poor kid looks like Little Lord Fauntleroy on the regular, and that cannot be comfortable. As much as W&K claim they want regular childhoods for their kids, they sure dress them to be bullied/be the bully.

    • notasugarhere says:

      It goes along with the strange photo from last year, released recently because there weren’t other ‘family photos’ for W&K to release. I’m thinking of the pic where she was holding him like an infant even though he was 4 at the time.

    • MY3CENTS says:

      If it’s cold enough for him (and her) to be wearing a sweater, he should be wearing long pants.

  8. Lauren42 says:

    I always have a sad feeling whenever I see these kids. They’re just little right now, and soon they’re going to be ruined. I know that’s a horrible word and maybe not the right one… but they’re being raised by horrible people with no interest in changing the destructive family patterns that have bred dysfunction into this family for generations. They’re just little kids and I wish someone would advocate for them like Diana or Harry would have, but instead they’re going to be props and basically “Upvote” reddit buttons for as long as their parents can get away with it. And when they’re older, they’ll turn on their parents and on each other. It just makes me sad.

  9. Seaflower says:

    You’d think with all the Cornwall money she could afford better wiglets, or at least have them properly blended.

    I wonder if she has some alopecia on the back of her head. A gf has developed a spot on the back of her head due to stress. The specialists say it won’t grow back.

  10. Emmi says:

    The kid is super cute.

    I saw the close-up on IG and honestly, I could have sworn Kate took the picture. It looks exactly like the ones she takes. The whole IG account of the photographer looks like this. So either Kate isn’t as bad a photographer as everyone always claims or this woman is rather uninspired herself.

    • Tessa says:

      Kate is average photographer. She is no Snowdon who had an actual career as a professional photographer

      • Emmi says:

        Yeah … so? These pics were obviously not taken by the late Lord Snowdon? How did he get involved?

      • Seraphina says:

        I think Tessa is simply stating, by comparison, that she is not a professional like Snowdon was. I would think Snowdon was mentioned because he was an actual photographer by trade and married into the royal family.

    • Barbie1 says:

      He is so darn cute. Happy birthday kid.

    • Becks1 says:

      I didn’t look at her IG but there are plenty of photographers in my area who make a lot of money taking this style of picture and it doesn’t strike me as especially talented. That’s been the thing with Kate – she’s a perfectly fine mom-tographer, to borrow the phrase used in my area. She has little to no official training, no professional photography courses in her resume, etc. A good camera with a good lens can make a big difference in terms of quality of the picture.

      I’m not super technical when it comes to photography or super knowledgeable, but these photos just seem super basic to me, professional photog or not.

    • notasugarhere says:

      No doubt she was ordering the photographer around and had final say over the pic released. This is a bland, basic photo, just like the ones Kate takes. That’s why she’d direct the photo to be so basic, either because

      1) she’s just so basic she has no aesthetic sense and/or

      2) she doesn’t want anyone to compare a good photo taken by someone else to her bad photos, so she ensures the photos by someone else are just as bad and basic as hers

    • BeanieBean says:

      I thought the same thing after doing a quick scroll through her IG, Kate must’ve been copying that style, or it’s a style the posh folk like. Closeup of face, blurry background. Pretty blah set of photos.
      As for Louis, he’s a cutie. I’d like to see him in clothes he picked out for himself–which I always prefer to see on any kid. I wonder if his entire closet is nothing but blue?

  11. Pumpkin says:

    RE Millie Pilkington: She was the photographer for W&K’s private wedding photos (Hugo Burnand was the official one) and one of the photographers for Pippa’s wedding. So Kate has been familiar with her for over a decade.

    And he looks cute (as usual). I find it nice to have Kate in them instead of her taking them (not that there’s anything wrong with that, it’s just a good change).

    • Blujfly says:

      And before that she took photos for Party Pieces. Very much the Middleton orbit

    • notasugarhere says:

      Yes, she’s a Midd insider who took all the photos for PP while Kate was claiming to do the work herself. All the PP pics were credited to Millie not Kate. In exchange for keeping her mouth shut, she was hired to do the private wedding photos to help launch her wedding photo business. They also let her (instructed her to) give her insider, ‘oh they’re so in love’ interview to press outlets after the wedding.

      Interesting she’s being brought back in now that PP is publicly failing. Maybe they needed to give her one last payday to ensure she keeps her mouth shut in the future.

  12. Bklne says:

    Sending lots of love and hugs to Mary Pester today!
    (Not trying to threadjack, just know she’ll be reading this post)

  13. [insert_catchy_name] says:

    I feel a bit petty saying this, but a better photo would have been him smiling at his mother- she just looks like a prop (especially considering no one would mess about in the garden in white)

    • BeanieBean says:

      Or gloves. I wouldn’t want to touch those rusty, peeling-paint handles without gloves.

  14. Tessa says:

    Some comments section posters made it about Kate the epitome of motherhood as one put it. I think Kate likes the attention

  15. Jais says:

    Cute kid. He’s got 3 other family members but his mom is the only other one in these public bday pics. Okaaay.

    • SAS says:

      Yeah, would be much cuter for his siblings to be pushing him in the wheelbarrow but then we don’t get a cycle of the supermum Kate story (and more important to her, imagery).

  16. Becks1 says:

    Louis looks cute. Unfortunately for the Waleses, releasing picture of the kids is just not going to generate the PR that it did a few years ago. At a minimum we’re seeing the kids 4-5 times a year (first day of school, christmas, easter, and then events like the Trooping, Jubbly, funerals, now the Chubbly, and then usually sporting events or the like as well.) So we do see the kids a great deal over the course of the year so these pictures just aren’t as interesting as they used to be. And that’s a problem for W&K because they need the kids to be interesting for their own PR.

  17. Amy Bee says:

    My guess is Kate watched Harry and Meghan’s docuseries. She didn’t need to be in the photo. It’s interesting Louis’ photo was on the front page of only 2 papers.

  18. Kel says:

    Another interesting point is that only a couple newspapers carried his picture front page which isn’t normal. Maybe they’ll rotate with each kid who gets exclusive front page.
    But that just sounds so ick. Literally using their kids to curry favor with the British tabloids

  19. Digital Unicorn says:

    These shots are so staged and badly so, esp the one with kHate – they are trying to hard to make it look natural but again it just looks like a cheap photoshoot for Town and Country.

    • Nic919 says:

      Yes who does yard work with their hair loose and styled and a white sweater? But really no need for her there. Louis can be cute in a photo on his own.

  20. Frippery says:

    They’re both cute pictures. The one with Kate looks like a Sears catalog shot, but still, it’s a cute picture.

  21. HamsterJam says:

    He is a handsome little boy and looks care-free unlike his brother and sister who always look like they are carrying the weight of the world on them.

    • Tessa says:

      I don’t think he is totally care free. He can get overtired like millions of other children who can sometimes act out. And he is in his school years now

  22. Hannah says:

    Oh my lord. A Capricorn / Gemini marriage! Wow 🤺 My bro is Capricorn & I’m Gemini. We lock heads all. the. time. (But I love him to bits cause he absolutely dotes on my nieces, his daughters)

    From Google search – Millie Pilkington – Kate Middleton – wedding

    “Millie Pilkington, the private photographer for the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, is seen as Kate Middleton enters a car as she leaves the Goring Hotel to make her way to Westminster Abbey ahead of her Royal Wedding to Prince William. (Photo by Joel Ryan/PA Images via Getty Images”

    Louis is cute in the pic, but I think all kids under 6 look cute as a button

  23. Barbara says:

    I hope his “hanging around the house” clothes aren’t so stuffy and that she lets the kids wear colors other than blue, burgundy and tan.

  24. Inge says:

    why did they put him in the trash & is K taking it out?

  25. HeatherC says:

    It’s cool enough out that both Louis and her are wearing sweaters (Louis is actually wearing *2* shirts) but sure, put the kid in shorts.

  26. NERMINE says:

    She saw Meghan appear in Lili’s birthday photo last year and now she’s copying her.

  27. Cathy says:

    It was the hardest walk Kate ever had to make.

    Pushing a wheelbarrow.

    With some kid in it.

    😉

  28. OriginalMich says:

    I’m not going to give her grief about the wiglet. For any number of reasons (stress, hormones, severe weight loss, autoimmune issues), she might have lost a significant amount of hair somewhere. With all of her resources, I don’t understand why she doesn’t have something that blends better but whatever. Hair loss can be pretty devastating.

    Louis is super cute. The wheelbarrow full of weeds pic is odd.

    • Ameerah M says:

      The issue isn’t that she wears extensions. Lots of people do. The issue is the quality. Someone with her resources should have more quality pieces that are properly blended and installed.

    • notasugarhere says:

      It isn’t about hairloss, it is about the massive hair fiction she’s been obsessing over for over a decade. She’s been overdoing the wiglets since the engagement announcement.

      Google kate middleton black hat white feathers to see her real hair. Those first few pics, of her in the black dress with white polka dots, is pre-engagement. Back when she was content to walk around with her own hair instead of someone else’s.

      • Jais says:

        Aw, just googled and her hair looked perfectly fine in those photos.

      • notasugarhere says:

        It does look perfectly fine. She’s the one who has a problem with it, since she’s been addicted to OTT wiglets for a decade now.

  29. AmelieOriginal says:

    Millie Pilkington supposedly took private pictures of Kate and William at their wedding (maybe the reception? we never got pics released from it) so they know her and have worked with her before.

    They are very cute pics, I like Louis’s Iceland style sweater.

  30. Elsa says:

    These photos are adorable and there is really nothing to denigrate.

  31. hangonamin says:

    looks cute! good pics too. can tell it was done by a professional. not mad about Kate being in it. probs just a combination of it being a good photo out of the bunch and shows a spontaneous nature of it. she’s blurry and in the background of the shot…a nod that she’s there but not center.

    • BeanieBean says:

      She’s actually foreground, not background, and there’s nothing spontaneous about it! 😉

      • hangonamin says:

        foreground, background…Louis looks happy and it’s a good picture with with his mom. didn’t think people would nitpick my comment about a picture of a cute kid today. have a great day! 😉

      • BeanieBean says:

        Oh, trust me, I thought twice about that comment! I’m just one of those people, a corrector! No offense meant! 😉

  32. AA says:

    He’s a cute kid. I think he’s going to be more handsome than George (who has too much William in him). I don’t see any William in Louis at all.

    • Margaret says:

      @ AA
      I agree 100%, there’s no willy there. Imho that has puzzled me for quite some time.

    • Tessa says:

      The two boys could unfortunately age like their father did. The Windsor looks taking over

    • Feeshalori says:

      Maybe, just maybe, the Middleton genes will prevail and Louis will maintain a nice head of hair and good looks as he ages.

  33. Blue Nails Betty says:

    Am I the only one seeing the copykeening? Most of the photos of the Sussex children are action shots that have one or both of their parents actively participating/bonding in whatever the child is doing.

    In the photo of Louis, it looks like they are trying to do an action shot (while he’s dressed like a boy from the ‘50s???) and Kate is trying to look like she is engaged with Louis (and yet looks so dang awkward like she just met this child).

    But maybe I’m overthinking this.

    • Christine says:

      You’re not. They are not complicated, and in this instance, the Wails’ agenda is clear.

  34. BayTampaBay says:

    Louis is the “spittin image” of Michael Middleton.

    • Lexistential says:

      He’s definitely Kate’s coloring. But I see a little bit of William- the closer-set Mountbatten eyes, and his lips curl similarly like William’s smile.

  35. Malificent says:

    My mother has the same birthday as Charlotte. If there is any carry-over, the royal family is in for a ride! My mom is all Taurus stubborn and a natural-born leader who everyone turns to for help because she knows how to take care of business. And from what we can see, Charlotte definitely has lots of spirit and sass. I can picture 20 years from now people saying that Charlotte is the one who really has the makings of a monarch.

  36. Beverley says:

    The Early Years expert must still be smarting after Louis’ appearance at last year’s Struggle Jubbly. She must be seen as the Perfect Mother, which puts so much responsibility on Louis.

  37. Whyforthelove says:

    Cute pic, but have to agree with the many who felt Kate was hogging the attention. Also?!?!?! Seeing the kid sitting on weeds makes me so so itchy.

  38. Tinna says:

    Cute photo. Happy birthday boy!!! This must be his real hair instead of blonde . All the wales kids had dark hair but somehow they change into lemon blond . People dont go from dark to lemon blond . Diana is more like dirty blond and I can believe she can change from dark to dirty blond not lemon blonde. Most people dont know thatlemon blonde is very rare and distinct gene . Only north european and russia have that trait. I know many american have because of mixed gene pool. This is kate her family is not mixed that we know off. RR never mentioned kate have ancestors from distant russia or Scandinavia. Most blue blood and royals of brf have dark hair color. Correct me if I’m wrong I dont recall anyone from aristocrats and brf had lemon blond people.

    I dont usually believed that kate dye these kids but now looking at his photo that’s clear the case. This island never has sun. Even if they got their vitamin d from those tropical island vacation only sun manage to get into their hair and rest of their skin looks pale and stale.

    This is the reason why their tropical island picture get weird color gradient .

    She is sick for coloring her kids hair . She is obsessed with diana 2.0

  39. HeyKay says:

    I am really starting to hate they way they are feeding those kids into the Monarchy PR machine.
    Maybe stop all the photos except for one family pic at New Years.
    Actually, I’d like all the PR for C&C, W&K to stop.
    Why is the BRF the only RF of Europe constantly, daily almost, online?

    H&M are doing a great job of keeping their kids offline.

  40. Jaded says:

    She’s clearly trying to push the “Ahly Yahs I’m the most expert and best mom ever” crap.

    • 9First comment says:

      The incident with Louis last year during jubilee must’ve really shaken them! Firstly, the photo on mother’s day with Kate carrying him as a baby and this picture are trying to “highlight “the bond between them… whatever…anyway,he is a cutie @

  41. candy says:

    Kate has a very specific idea of how she needs to look. Every woman is entitled to her own aesthetic, but I sort of wish she would grow out of her college look instead of clinging to it.

    Also, I don’t want to pile on but William is a Cancer, not a Gemini. This explains their on-and-off dynamic during their dating years. Cancer never fully lets go. Also, within their family dynamic, Capricorn & Cancer are complementary opposites. It is a complex dynamic, and their bond is hard to undo once established. I’m not surprised they have two Taurus kids, and another cancer. These themes often occur within families. They should become a very tight knit family as Taurus is very compatible with both Cancer and Capricorn. All these signs are very family oriented. However, without fire or air as anyone’s sun sign, it can become heavy and muddy. They don’t have anything to offset the weight of each of these signs such as a fiery Leo or a messy Aquarius.

  42. jferber says:

    Tinna, I agree. Maybe she’s also competing with many of the great-grandchildren who DO have very blond hair. Blonder hair means “whiter” to her, obviously. She clearly wants her kids to be whiter. Maybe because her niece and nephew in America have fairer skin than her own children, being gingers? So she dyes her kids’ hair. Nut job. Racist. Exploiter.

  43. jferber says:

    If Louis were photo shopped into the picture with the queen, why wasn’t he there with his brother and sister already, as would be expected? Was there a fear he would misbehave? Don’t remember if this were before or after the Louis antics at the Jubbly.