Prince William & Kate blamed the children for the family’s lateness to the coronation

Omid Scobie wrote a “reporter’s notebook” piece about the coronation for Harper’s Bazaar this week. I would imagine that he’s still hard at work on his latest book, Endgame, about the declining power and declining popularity of the British monarchy. I mention that because that’s the vibe of his Bazaar piece – praise for the Windsors for pulling off a coronation without any catastrophes, but also acknowledging that this might be the last Chubbly, or perhaps the penultimate Chubbly. Still, Scobie’s piece was full of some interesting details and shady asides. Some highlights:

Why the Waleses were late to the coronation: In fact, apart from Prince William and Princess Kate joining the procession late (children were to blame, a source tells me), and Camilla’s ladies in attendance—sister Annabel Elliot, and queen’s companion the Marchioness of Lansdowne—accidentally creating an unfortunate wedgie moment out of her silk Bruce Oldfield dress on the way into the Abbey, very few hitches took place.

The flashcards: Every precaution had been taken to avoid mistakes. From the mountain of flash cards held up throughout the ceremony to ensure that no word was misspoken or missed, to the discreet marks placed on the floor of the abbey so key members of the congregation knew where to stand.

Prince Louis toughed it out: Even Prince Louis, whose playful antics at Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee concert last year stole the show, was (mostly) on his best behaviour. Aides had warned us beforehand that the five-year-old may “retire” during the two-hour service due to his age, but apart from a short 20-minute break, he stuck the entire thing out.

Charles looked sad: Still, despite so much being planned and practiced in advance, nothing could hide the nerves that were evident on King Charles’s face as he entered the abbey. Though this was a moment he had been waiting for his entire adult life, the king looked deep in thought and even confused at times.

Harry’s presence: Prince Harry, who had flown in the day before the proceedings, seemed laid-back and comfortable sitting in the third row of family members next to Princess Beatrice and Edward Mapelli Mozzi, and Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank. Sources said he was keen to support his father on the most important day of his life, but he was equally eager to get back home in time to see his son, Prince Archie, on his fourth birthday.

The coronation didn’t feel celebratory: But, whether it was collective nerves or the pouring rain outside, a sense of joy was tough to sense inside the abbey. Even amongst the family members, few smiles were shared (at one point Princess Anne’s daughter, Zara Tindall, looked like she was falling asleep).

Queen Side Chick: For Queen Camilla it seemed at times she was unsure of what emotions to express. No doubt aware of the mixed emotions members of the public had about her crowning, she may have thought showing too big a smile would send the wrong message. But any nerves that were visible on her face at the start of the service soon dissipated for Camilla after smiles from the grandsons and great-nephew she selected as her pages of honour. Teenagers Louis and Gus (the latter who was nursing a broken arm following a bike accident) grinned at their grandmother several times during the ceremony, clearly putting her at ease. By the time she was anointed and crowned, and her decades-long transformation from the heir apparent’s mistress to queen was complete, the weight on her shoulders seemed to have melted away.

Andrew didn’t get permission to wear his Garter robes? Of course, the day didn’t come without some controversy—Prince Andrew showed up in his royal garter robes after being asked not to attract attention, and dozens of Republic activists were arrested near the procession despite having the legal right to peacefully protest.

The terribly white balcony: While Charles clearly has an interest in enhancing diversity, it was impossible to ignore the fact that the royal family’s only family member of color (and mother of the House of Windsor’s only mixed-race children), Duchess Meghan, didn’t feel comfortable or welcome enough to attend.

[From Harper’s Bazaar]

Yeah… it looks like Prince William and Kate’s people are putting it out there that the kids are “to blame” for the family’s lateness. It could be, but Kate and William definitely looked like they were the ones fighting. I also think they were late because they were filming a fruity behind-the-scenes fan-cam for social media. As for Louis… he did behave well for his age, which is why it bothers me so much that his parents are constantly putting him in a position to “act right” for hours at a time in front of the world’s media. Will and Kate seem like they’re actively cultivating the narrative that Louis is the “wild one,” the “clown.” The scapegoat, perchance. Also: I found the flashcards bizarre, especially for William, the only one who had a speaking role outside of Charles and Camilla. William had two lines to memorize and he couldn’t do it. He had to read them off of a flashcard, barely making eye contact with his father. A mess.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

163 Responses to “Prince William & Kate blamed the children for the family’s lateness to the coronation”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Nubia says:

    What is this unfortunate wedgie moment, was it on camera or behind the scenes?

    • L84Tea says:

      There was footage of Camilla walking into the abbey with her LIW trying to lift the back of her dress from the ground awkwardly. For a split second, it looked like Camilla picked a wedgie while the back skirt was being lifted.

  2. HamsterJam says:

    Proving that your children are never too young to be thrown under the bus

    • Bee says:

      Loius looks perpetually unhappy. Perhaps he’s figured out that he’s the spare.

      • Nadia says:

        I always think George looks unhappy and nervous.

      • Anance says:

        In this case, George was placed next to Rose’s child. He never looked but did point out planes.

        I guess the Rose thing is still on, and their family and Parker-Bowles are close.

      • Well Wisher says:

        All of the children seem too pensive for their age.

    • Josephine says:

      Ah, the tradition continues. Sorry, W&hate, but at this age, when your children are late it is your inept parenting. But I’m sure it was not the kids – the two of them were probably taking turns having tantrums.

    • Lady D says:

      I thought the kids would be at least 12 before he started sacrificing them to the media, following in daddy’s footsteps so to speak.

    • SarahLee says:

      I knew they were going that route. They are so like us – so middle-class – and as we all know it is very difficult to wrangle kids out the door under any circumstances. ROFL. They certainly have no help – I’m sure Kate had to dress all 3 children herself, plus get her own self ready!

    • MS CP says:

      @HamsterJam Exactly! I hope Louis has a real strong personality, looks like he is going to need it. 😔

    • Cara says:

      Darn that Meghan!! If only she had attended, they could have blamed it all on her.

    • traci says:

      this is what harry said during his spare promotion. that he was worried about the wales children being treated differently because they are the spares. and it’s already started with louis being the unruly child. he’s going to be blamed for so much of george’s stuff in the future.

    • PrincessOfWaffles says:

      Well, Louis is 5 now, so he’s too late to shape according to top ceo statistic tart Khate

  3. SAS says:

    Such a crock and so insulting to their staff who I’m sure prepared the kids with time to spare. For all the weirdness around the last minute order to wear robes and Kate not wearing the jewels the press had been briefed about you can’t tell me they weren’t fighting about something which caused a delay. Poor kids.

    • WiththeAmericann says:

      It’s so weird how many people were repeating that narrative in their defense, like they are a normal family with no Nannies.

      • Becks1 says:

        Yeah, its really weird to me that the excuses about the kids always seem to work, but I guess that’s why they do it. Even in this post you have people saying “well its hard to get out the door with three kids.”

        In this situation, getting out the door on time with three kids is literally their job.

      • WiththeAmericann says:

        @becks1 absolutely they do it because it works, it also does that thing that the royal family were told they must reinforce to remain relevant: “happy aspirational family”

        Clearly they are failing at that, so pushing “hands on mom and dad putting the kids first” is hardcore propaganda to cover the clear contempt the parents have for one another, he has for his own brother, SIL and step mom.

        Yeah, their job and they have help doing it! And they rehearsed it numerous times. The bar is so low.

      • BeanieBean says:

        And they actually just had to get out the door with two kids; George had already gone because of his page duties. He may even have spent the night at BP or wherever the page boys stayed. I would have planned it that way, at least; make sure the eight kids are coming from the same place on the important day.

    • VivaLasVirgos says:

      It’s remarkable how, somehow, Diana and Charles got places in time despite THEIR children.

  4. Miranda says:

    Someone just slip Louis his Uncle Harry’s number now, please. And I think Kate is the type of mother who will eventually become jealous of her own daughter, so Charlotte might want to have a chat with Aunt Meghan.

    • SquiddusMaximus says:

      Imagine girls’ nights with Charlotte, Eugenie, Megs, and Lilibet! Those girls would know how to have fun. Kate… ugh. Kate’s household would serve cabbage soup to keep you trim.

    • Blue Nails Betty says:

      I look forward to the time when those children are old enough to sneak read Spare.

      • Snuffles says:

        You have to wonder if they hear things from their schoolmates. I’m betting the school parents are reading and gossiping about it. Even the teachers and staff.

    • lanne says:

      I read something recently about how, for many women, especially those with appearance-obsessed mothers, their mother is their first bully. The appearance policing on that poor girl is going to start early. Will Kate, having experienced it herself, be fiercely protective of Charlotte and prevent it as much as possible, or will she be Charlotte’s first bully, thinking she’s “helping” by giving Charlotte at home a taste of the misogyny the British media will give her? I think we can imagine that answer, seeing how those kids are already being served up. Also, from what we’ve seen, the royal family seems to think that public bullying is a form of hazing that members of the family need to accept and tolerate because “everybody gets it.”

      Poor kids.

      • acha says:

        I have to thank you for your first sentence — that’s so insightful, and shed a whole lot of light on my own upbringing. Appreciate it and thank you.

      • CH says:

        Even if it’s not Kate, it could be Carol. My mother can be a bully to her granddaughter (my niece). We all have to be on alert about it.

      • MissMarirose says:

        @CH. I’m sure it is. These sorts of things are cyclical. One family member passes it down to the next and so on and so on.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        @ Ianne, powerful statements as we will certainly see how this comes to fruition as it certainly at play as we speak. KKHate will certainly not be the role model that those children need or deserve. Add TOB into the equation will cement the trajectory of these children’s lives.

      • Nic919 says:

        Knowing how image obsessed Kate is right now, it is unlikely that it’s not being applied to the kids.

      • Jaded says:

        @Ianne – you are spot on. One of my closest, life-long friends had a mother like that, a very posh English woman whose mother and father were Lord and Lady Blandishment or some such, and she was MEAN. My friend was the overweight “ugly duckling” of 4 children and her mother picked on her and humiliated her incessantly. Needless to say she grew up with zero self-esteem, has suffered depression, OCD and C-PTSD all her life and made 2 suicide attempts as a teenager. I think given the type of parenting they get, mixed with the troubles in the Wails’ marriage, those kids are looking at some issues as they grow up.

      • Mustlovedogs says:

        @lanne your comment is incredibly insightful and true. This describes my mother perfectly. Even up to her passing in her 80s she was criticising my and my sister’s appearance. God forbid if we put on a kilo. We were never allowed to forget it. That critical voice, from the person who should be your safe place and your support, creates long term pain and fixed beliefs which take a lot of work to understand and overcome. I was so touched and grateful when one of my own grown daughter’s friends said to my daughter-
        ‘ your mum doesn’t seem to be critical of you…’. The friend’s mum was like mine sadly. I vowed that I would not be that mother. Hugs to those of you who know this from bitter experience. xx

    • Sid says:

      Way back when things began to fall apart, one of the interesting tidbits one of the rota rats inadvertently let slip was that one of the reasons Meghan was saddened by the whole thing was because she was very fond of Charlotte. It stuck with me because it flew in the face of the nonsense stories the rats had previously put out about killer flowers and such. And it felt like one of the rare moments when a rota rat unknowingly let the truth out. When the tights story came out, and then other bizarre stories about Meghan and Charlotte, I realized what was likely happening. So many rota stories about Meghan were either deliberately switching her in for the royal who had actually behaved badly, or were telling the opposite of what happened. I suspect Meghan and Charlotte really did bond, especially with Meghan being such a girl’s girl. I also suspect Mrs. Wails didn’t like that. Hence the stories trying to make Meghan a villain when it came to Charlotte.

      • Laura D says:

        Totally agree with this @Sid. During the funeral I saw (and posted on here) Charlotte turning around to talk to Meghan and Kate sharply turning her back to face the front. Meghan looked crestfallen. I suppose it could be argued that it was a formal occasion and Kate was upholding protocol but, IMHO it wasn’t a good look I doubt we’ll ever get a chance to see the clip again as the BRF now own the footage. The footage which BTW was paid for by the licence payers, make that make sense!

      • Trix says:

        There was a moment at the funeral when Charlotte looked at her and Meghan smiled at her. Same in the church with Harry. That kid isn’t dumb. She’s going to ask some questions about why her parents are such dicks when she gets to 12 or so.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        @ Sid, even with children, Meghan is a threat to KKHate. Oh my, how that must burn her web of wiglets!!

        To be certain @ Trix, they will come of age to be looking for answers as to why their parents hostility of H&M is directed at them. Oh the web we weave in order to deceive…

    • HeyJude says:

      Charlotte seems very “I’m in charge” when interacting with her brothers, very confident, mature, and head sure. I imagine Kate won’t like that eventually. She’s also adorable which again Kate will resent.

      I believe Prince Harry already spoke out about his concerns for the next spares and making sure they’re treated right. He was rudely sniped at by William that he’d worry about his own children in response to that IIRC. Instead of a normal person who would have been like, “I’m glad my children have people who care, we ensure they’re all treated well”. It rubbed me very wrong. William’s reactiveness to that was telling. Harry struck a nerve.

      • Is that so? says:

        I’ve noticed Charlotte playing the role of ‘little’ mother and getting good press for it. If that is a household where the parents constantly fight, and Charlotte either tries to keep the peace for her brothers or keeps them in line, she runs the risk of being parentified.

    • ABB says:

      I am SO here for the narrative of Louis making extended trips to visit his aunt, uncle and cousins as he gets older!

      • BothSidesNow says:

        @ABB, he certainly will not be traveling alone as I imagine that given how we perceive Charlottes personality, she will be visiting as well!!

    • Well Wisher says:

      I second the comment about the future mother/daughter dynamic.

  5. Pinkosaurus says:

    I think her attendant accidentally pulled the front of her dress between her legs as she was walking in. I wouldn’t call it a wedgie but her skirt was briefly tangled around her legs.

    • Bee says:

      Not sure what happened there but it was extremely undignified. Guess they should have got a 14 y/o to do it.

  6. Sid says:

    If they were running late because of the children then they shouldn’t have wasted time filming instagram reels. These two are something else.

    • Bee says:

      There’s no way the kids weren’t ready in time. This whole thing screams (no pun intended) parents’ argument. Either beforehand (likely, so Kate would have to fix her makeup) or else in the car.

      I will say this, Kate had perfect stony face once she arrived.

  7. ThatsNotOkay says:

    “Though this was a moment he had been waiting for his entire adult life, the king looked deep in thought and even confused at times”

    Hmm. What are you implying, Omid?

    And, yeah, the kids aren’t to blame. If you’re their parents, that falls on you. You know your kids. You should’ve had them ready to go earlier than early so there would be no hold up. And the fact that you have staff, servants, nannies, grannies, and crannies makes it all the more egregious. Just admit it. You two were screaming at each other because William didn’t get home ‘til morning.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      To blame the kids for being late when you have a whole staff to get them ready on time is not at all credible.

    • Chaine says:

      Yeah what is that all about? Is this a hint that there are concerns about dementia?? Seems unlikely since his parents lived to advanced ages and seemed to have their faculties about them until close to the end.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Might’ve been some ageism on Scobie’s part. That said, I was watching a short video yesterday where Charles visited something to pull the curtain back on some little plaque & he had difficulty walking up a couple of stairs. All I could think was, here’s your opportunity Chuck, use a cane! It’s not that hard & it will help not only you, but others if you normalize assistive devices. Don’t repeat your mother’s mistakes & don’t listen to the poor advice she got.

    • Robert Phillips says:

      I wonder if Charles truly expected that being crowned King would make everyone suddenly love him? And then he saw all the protestors on the way there. And he realized that he isn’t liked and that isn’t going to change. And that is why he looked that way.

      • BothSidesNow says:

        The outcry of the public regarding the massive arrests was the only highlight of the Con-A-Nation. KFC is neither loved nor respected by his “people”. I do hope that Burger King took a long deep look into how his reign as king will be as it was in his face for everyone to see.

    • BothSidesNow says:

      @ ThatsNotOkay, given the countless memes revolving around the death stares between the TOB and KKHate, it was blatantly apparent that there was certainly a row or two before they arrived. And who blames their tardiness on their children when we all know that they have an army of help?? Such disgusting parents….

      • Jaded says:

        Yup. And the tension between William and Charles was palpable it was so obvious. Sh*t went down and it wasn’t the kids’ fault, hence the Wails being sent to the gulag on the balcony. They can’t even be arsed to put their own buffoonery aside on Charles’s special day — disgusting is right.

  8. Tessa says:

    And the media toned down Andrew being present with headline stories as to why he was there.

    • Christine says:

      JFC, the fact that ANYONE in England is talking about two little kids being to blame for their middle aged parents getting to a church on time, while Pedo paraded around in his ceremonial robes is fucking ridiculous. HOW are people yelling about how hard it is to get kids (who have an entire staff who makes sure they eat, get to school on time, do their homework, etc.) out the door?

      I’m a single mom, and my son is never late. Apparently it’s due to the fact that I don’t have to trip over a pedophile or wait for his actual parents to show up.

  9. EllenOlenska says:

    The thing that stood out for me was that aside from the pathetic flash cards for William (because saying the words confidently from memory would maybe even have signaled “I am a future king” but nope, it was more like,I’m a lousy actor) was that there was zero warmth or feeling shown by either party towards each other in the moments immediately after. No warm smile like, ”yup, made it thru that!” No private joke or warmth. Or even gratitude in either direction. Just like two bad actors reading the lines of a mediocre play for the first time.

    • SquiddusMaximus says:

      You bring up a good point: In this age of Internet transparency (and Spare!) it’s critical for the BRF to be able to humanize themselves and endear themselves to the British people. Which they absolutely refuse to do. They have such entitled, royal scepters up their arses that they refuse to bring any sense of personality to their “work” — much better to be stoic and above them all. IMO, this will be part of their undoing.

    • SAS says:

      I haven’t watched it but heard how dour William’s oath was, I suspect it was a hangover of tension (Will) and anger (Charles) about the lateness.

      • Bad Janet says:

        They seem to be clinging to the idea that the stiff British aristocratic upper lip is what shows leadership, rather than showing a shred of humanity. It’s all they’ve been taught and all they’ve ever known; they’ve lived in castles in their heads all their life.

        No wonder they hated warm, vibrant, vivacious Diana so much. She was everything they weren’t and absolutely beloved for it. It’s sad to see they learned nothing from the tragic fiasco her whole adult life and did the exact. same. thing. to Meghan.

      • Coldbloodedjellydonut says:

        All the cue card reading and coldness of all parties involved really struck me. I also thought it odd that Camilla didn’t swear her allegiance to Charles, Phillip did to Elizabeth.

  10. lanne says:

    I don’t know if coronations should be joyous–the clips I’ve seen of Elizabeths seemed more momentous and awe-inspiring than joyous, but I saw nothing that gave me a sense of awe. Watching the bits I did made me feel uncomfortable. The two principals looked like they’d have been better off sitting in front of a TV watching a televised Shakespeare play. The berobed folks looked ridiculous and uncomfortable–I thought Kate’s flower crown was pretty, but her robe looked cheap, cheap, cheap. William looked like he was playing dress-up, as did the Edinburgh-Wessexes.

    If someone told me this was a coronation being filmed for a TV show, not even a prestige film, I would have believed it.

    • Sid says:

      Looking at the photos and video clips I was genuinely shocked at how cheap some of the robes and tops looked. The seams on Mrs. Wails’s robe and on Chuck’s shirt looked uneven and badly stitched. The fabrics looked bargain bin. And they couldn’t do anything to make the crowns fit properly so they wouldn’t fall sideways?

      • SarahCS says:

        The purple and gold thing that C3 was wearing really stood out and gave me cheap pyjamas vibes.

        The other people’s robes were truly awful, especially the blue and red ones on the women. but they all looked like they raided granny’s dressing up box in the attic.

      • Chrissy says:

        I imagine chin straps would have solved the problem.

      • Lady D says:

        LOL Chrissy.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Yeah, you shouldn’t see any puckering at the seams on a well-made garment. Chuck’s in particular looked bad. The older velvet robes some folks wore were better looking & I think better made.

      • Nic919 says:

        I thought the purple tunic was the one George VI wore but I agree the purple looked off.

      • Serafina says:

        I would be so upset if I was Sophie and Kate, if I spent weeks and months with designers for embroidered elegant white dresses etc (in line with the ladies at Elizabeth‘s coronation) to only be then told last minute to wear these cheap ugly overdecorated polyester frocks. Valentine Low of the Times actually confirmed in an article that it was Charles asking the Waleses to wear the robes and no tiara to underline the formality of the event. So transparent. These robes look costume-ish not more formal. Looks like from a cheap three musketeer film. I would bet anything that nothing like that will be worn at William‘s coronation. He will just be in Dress Uniform. Or whatever you call it.

    • CrazyHeCallsMe says:

      The gowns and robes from Netflix Queen Charlotte looked better than what was worn at KC3’s coronation.

    • Becks1 says:

      I don’t know if the ceremony itself should be joyous – its a solemn occasion – but the whole thing was just so……flat. Like the royals look happier walking into Westminster Abbey for a memorial service than they did for the coronation. charles looked like he was struggling to stay awake, Camilla looked smug, William looked bored and like he would rather be anywhere but there, etc.

      It was just……flat and boring.

      • BeanieBean says:

        I thought the squishing down of the crowns on both C&C’s heads to be quite amusing. Like, this WILL fit! No matter the shape of your head, the shape of the crown, that cameras are on all of us, I will get this on so that it doesn’t fall off!! Don’t move! Keep your head up!

      • Barb Mill says:

        Looking at photos from QE coronation people were smiling and looked happy. Granted they were a young attractive couple but still it felt more like a funeral. I guess if it is the end of the monarchy that’s what it was.

    • LB says:

      Elizabeth’s coronation was at such a different time in history. The UK was still recovering from WW2, the “empire” was falling apart and her father died prematurely. Although she was so young, as Queen, she was to bring help bring stability and reestablish the UK’s place in the world. Churchill and his government wanted the coronation to be a grand and unifying event. It must have been a lot for a 27 year old woman, with two small children, her demanding husband having to give up his naval career and still grieving the loss of her father. In the case of Charles, the world is so different and a majority of people are questioning the existence of the monarchy itself. Charles is an 70 something privileged man who treated his ex-wife, son, dil and grandchildren horribly. Add in Brexit, the ghost of Diana, C&C’s racism and scheming, W&K’s bullying & laziness, plus sketchy Andrew. All of this does not add up to a momentous event.

      • Kate says:

        Thank you, this. You really can’t compare the two coronations. The monarchy just doesn’t mean as much to as many people now as it used to. It just feels sooo old fashioned and weird now (to me, an American).

      • Nic919 says:

        Also we have only ever seen clips of Elizabeth’s coronation and not the full ceremony live, so when it is edited in our minds we don’t see the dull in between parts that set up various parts of the service.
        And yes times have changed.

    • Well Wisher says:

      It should be solemn and reflective as it was.

  11. Normades says:

    If the kids were to blame then it was the parents fault. Bad organization, not enough prep time, bathroom time etc….that is on the parents. The kids are not in charge.

  12. Blue Nails Betty says:

    That they are already setting Louis up to be a scapegoat is beyond disgusting.

    • Belli says:

      That poor boy. No matter what the children’s personalities become as they grow up he’s already been given his future role as the wild one to set up George as the calm, regal one by contrast. And he’s barely five years old.

      And William won’t see anything wrong with it because he has benefitted from the same system all his life.

      • Lady Digby says:

        I am also dismayed at the way Louis at 5 is already being portrayed by the BM. He is a little boy forced to sit through marathon and boring events. Sadly both parents are exploiting their own children to fulfill media contract. I am pro Democratically elected head of state so that these youngsters get the right to live their lives outside The Truman Show!

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        Well said, Lady Digby. It’s a form of child abuse. These kids, neither the heir or “spares”, asked for any of this. And all of us who read SPARE are acutely aware of how damaging it is to young children to be raised in this dysfunctional system.

    • Claire says:

      How are they setting him up to be a scapegoat? Negative comments I’ve seen about Louis have only been from here which I scratch my head about. I do agree it’s problematic for any kids to be raised within that system though.

      • Nic919 says:

        They are blaming him for making them late to the coronation so that would be making him the scapegoat. In this case Charlotte too.

      • Bee says:

        Louis putting his hand over Kate’s mouth at the jubbly got international press, so idk what you’re going on about, saying negative comments being only from here. It was all over.

      • Belli says:

        Painting him as “the wild one” or “the clown” when he’s five is a cute story. The press pushing stories about “Prince Louis’ wild antics” looks very different when he’s eighteen or twenty five. That’s not so playful and positive.

        But they will keep pushing him him into that role because then it sets up George as the sensible, perfect future king by contrast. We’ve seen this all play out before and it’s going to happen again because it serves the interests of both the monarchy and the press. Hence, scapegoat. It’s setting the groundwork for him to be the foil for George in the press and that’s going to last their whole lives.

      • Dhianna says:

        Not only here but I have read some on the DF…….same type of reasons, excuses..etc.

      • Normades says:

        “Negative comments I’ve seen about Louis have only been from here”. I guess you’ve never been to a place called Twitter.

  13. girl_ninja says:

    They were late because they couldn’t care to be on time. After all that shit show was not about them. It was about Chuck and Side chick Queen Cammie.

    “William had two lines to memorize and he couldn’t do it. He had to read them off of a flashcard, barely making eye contact with his father. ”

    Of course not. Why put effort into anything but pruning rose bushes.?

  14. MJM says:

    I side eye parents who scapegoat their children when they are late. My brother in law did that one time when he and his family were late to a get together with my family. Said their 15 year old was slow to get moving. I saw right through that nonsense.

  15. Inge says:

    Ofcourse they did. An accuse Kate has used before(when she was late to an opening at the National History Museum? Attendees were not pleased, they had to wait for her, then she was shown the exhibition for 10 min. and left or something). No accuntability, it’s always someone else

    • Harper says:

      On their wedding day, when Will and Kate and CRex and Cams were leaving Clarence House to drive to their reception, everyone got into the waiting car except for Kate, who hung back with the photographer to look at some of the pics he had just snapped. She didn’t seem to care that she kept the other senior royals waiting while she chatted him up.

      So likewise on Coronation Day, I’d be very surprised if Kate didn’t take the time to check the footage they had just shot before driving away, or even retake her footage if she didn’t like what she saw. It’s very easy for time to slip away while trying to film things.

      Of course, Princess Instagram knows she is in deep doo-doo with the King, and probably more with Cams, who had to sit and listen to his bitchin in the carriage without being able to slip out and have a smoke because all those cameras were focused on them.

      • Becks1 says:

        @Harper oh I know what you are talking about with the wedding day, but I always assumed it was give herself an excuse for getting in the car by herself. Like William just walked ahead of her, didn’t turn to help, didn’t offer her a hand, etc. So she stops to talk to the photographer and look at the pics to make it less obvious that he’s just going into the car without her.

        But you’re right that either way, it made the other royals wait (including Charles) while she looked at the photographs.

      • Nic919 says:

        I think they have edited that clip because I think I have only seen them walk out which looked like it was done together. (with her fugly fur bolero and sparkly belt)

  16. MsIam says:

    I’m glad Louis seems to have graduated to long pants, let’s hope it’s a permanent change. Also, lol at Andrew’s balls at showing up in that robe! Maybe he thought that would get him on the balcony and in the pictures but “nope”. And yet all the outrage for Harry’s Dior suit. Smh, the Unroyal mafia at its finest.

    • Tessa says:

      They showed him at the concert.with Sarah. He looked grim.

      • Lady D says:

        I sincerely hope that is his mood these days. He’s had 4+ decades, of making life hell for hundreds (1000’s) of people. I’ll save my sympathy for the Virginia’s that have crossed his path. Grim, broke and miserable suits him to a T. The only thing better would be him in prison.

      • Jaded says:

        He always looks grim these days, it’s his de facto expression. I imagine he’s dreading the news of Virginia Giuffre’s memoir coming out and exposing more of his despicable behaviour, not just with her but with other victims.

    • Gelya says:

      The fairy tales that this family can spin!

      This is a society family where every minute is scheduled to precision by a team of experts in their respective position. The children were in the car probably ten minutes early and were probably waiting on Will & Kate. The nannies and aides know the drill. To imply that the kids were at fault is cruel to the employees who take care of and love these children as their own. The two to be blamed are the photo op parents who were late by their choice.

      I am disappointed in Louis, lol. Not one tiny antic at all? He did give a good side eye. Louis is my favorite. I see so much of Harry and Margret in his personality. Charlotte reminds me so much of the Queen and her Mother.

  17. Tessa says:

    I was shocked that the dm had photos of will misbehaving as a child. And compared him to Louis at the jubilee. Usually they use harry . Maybe the media won’t be so kind to bill now. C and c may appreciate that.

  18. Becks1 says:

    Yeah, it was not the children. Each child probably had a dedicated nanny focused on them that morning with the one directive – to have them ready at X time. and the nannies would not fail that directive.

    But hey, like others have said, never too early to throw the kids under the bus. “The kids made us late” sounds better than “we were fighting over william’s mistress.”

    • Debbie says:

      By using their kids as an excuse for being late they are also indirectly blaming their staff, because it’s no secret that they have plenty of childcare takers. Either way, it’s blaming people or young kids who can’t speak out for themselves.

  19. Belli says:

    Shout out to the young boy at the start of the ceremony. No flashcards there, he had learned his lines and was word perfect!

  20. Laura D says:

    Just when I think the loathsome pair can’t sink any lower they pull this crape. No-one will be able to persuade me that they were late because of Charlotte and Louis. W&K were probably squabbling about how to make themselves look good on their Instagram clip, while Charlotte and Louis just stood around waiting to do as they were told. Instead of blaming two innocent kids why couldn’t they (just for once) do the adult thing and own their mess.

  21. Amy Bee says:

    I said it a few days ago William and Kate were late because they were filming that promo video. The signs are there that the press are setting Louis to be Harry’s replacement as the wild child. If I was William and Kate I wouldn’t bring him out so much just to give him some protection.

  22. Flower says:

    So much to unpack.

    Louis the scapegoat even though he is not even the spare. Is it any wonder he acts out at his tender age?

    Not a fan of WanK, however Charlotte and Louis are so cute and Charlotte seems very protective of her younger brother.

    The line about Andrew is a shocker, I wonder what he has over Charles to keep showing up to major events in this way.

    The description of Harry and his cousins seems accurate and the reference to Zara was interesting.

    • Coldbloodedjellydonut says:

      I was surprised Zara sleeping wasn’t covered here. I saw a tiktok somewhere or other where she was eyes-closed for quite a bit and they said she and her dump truck of a husband were out drinking until 2 am. The general consensus seemed to be “so relatable!” “aren’t they charming!” when we all know the reaction if it was H&M or Eug or Bea.

  23. First comment says:

    This hilarious excuse is just another way to show to the world how hands on parents they are…the nerve! There are many royals around Europe with small children. Have we ever heard them being late in such an important event? Side note: the fact that there’s an excuse makes clear to everyone that they were late!

  24. Jais says:

    Child labour and exploitation. These kids were born into press scrutiny and a fishbowl. Never given a choice. Obviously it comes with many privileges, but it’s still messed up.

  25. Kelsey says:

    “By the time she was anointed and crowned, and her decades-long transformation from the heir apparent’s mistress to queen was complete, the weight on her shoulders seemed to have melted away.”

    I screamed.

    • Alice says:

      I felt sick seeing this cheater, thief, abuser crowned! She’s no queen. She’s no one who belongs there and this is not her place. Disgusting.
      And what about the utter hypocrisy of CofE?! Two adulterers and divorcees on the thrones and one of them head of the CofE! This pathetic organization has no leg to stand on from now on and should keep quiet at all times on any personal matter!

  26. Digital Unicorn says:

    Are we all surprised they blamed the kids – they tried to blame Chuck for being early and when that didn’t stick they’ve chucked the kids under the bus.

    They were late because of kHate and filming that cheap ass video – you can tell by Williams face that he knows they are late and he is NOT happy. kHate was mugging as much as her botox face would allow.

    And yeah they argued in the car and then they argued in the carriage back to BP. KP is scrambling to shut this story down while BP is being silent. Given this stunt and the Middletons are the next royal family pieces – Cams will be briefing the press and am sure we’ll start to see negative stories coming out about them.

    • BeanieBean says:

      I just watched a bit of video of Cams, then Chuck, then the Cambridges pulling up the rear at the Abbey. Yikes! That is bad, really bad, the king is supposed to be the last one up the aisle. Oh, I bet Charles was p*ssed!!!

      • Jaded says:

        Charles’s face said it all when Willnot did the pledge to him. They could barely look each other in the eye. The Wails are going to pay for this.

  27. Claud says:

    I’m not here to love on the Wales, but I have three kids the same age distances that they do. I can tell you from endless experiences, that no matter how early you get them ready, how many people participate, someone will have a last-minute bathroom emergency/screaming or tearful meltdown/lose something. If there’s a deadline that everyone is tense about, the parents will take it out on each other.

    I have no doubt that William and Kate are the egotistical ghouls that they are frequently portrayed as, BUT! I also think in this one circumstance—the lateness totally tracks, and they really weren’t THAT late. The “lip reading” comments that Charles made simply show that he had zero involvement for preparing a child for anything.

    • Becks1 says:

      No. People need to stop doing this.

      They are not in the same position as anyone else here on this site. They have more professional help than anyone realizes. This was not just another event. This was probably the biggest event of Charles’ life, and William’s will be one of the biggest events in his – same for George if it goes that long.

      They were late enough to miss their entrance and have to walk behind Charles and Camilla, AFTER making him wait in his carriage outside the abbey.

      Using their kids as an excuse when it was Kate wanting to make IG fancams is just gross.

      Also, I have kids and know lots of people with kids. the people who are regularly on time with kids are the same people who were on time without kids. Everyone can be late once in a while, obviously, it happens. But Kate has a track record of being late AND for an event like this, with the strict timetable, etc, you plan to get your ass there on time.

      • Claud says:

        I respect your opinion and experiences. I’m simply sharing mine. When comments get into “people need to stop…”, however, it takes opinion sharing into a combative territory and tries to make facts out of situations in which none of us were present. I have no clue what kind of people the Wales’s are, although I can infer from proper news sources that they are not anyone I regret not knowing. I used my own experiences with kids that age to suggest that the possibility of kids having a meltdown, etc could have caused their lateness—anyone’s really—staff or no. I can’t account for PR videos, or prior lateness other than to say I wouldn’t advise it, as it looks bad when an actual roadblock occurs.

      • Becks1 says:

        I said “people need to stop” because its a common defense of the Waleses – to act like our experiences with our children is anything like theirs, and therefore the same excuses can apply, because they are so “normal” and are “just like us” etc.

        they are in a very unique position in terms of help, this was a very unique event the likes of which none of us have ever attended.

        Saying “well I’m late for things too with my kids sometimes” ignores those two very basic facts and gives the Waleses a pass they frankly do not deserve. Everyone else managed to get there on time.

    • WiththeAmericann says:

      But How did all of those pages get there on time? So many parents had to have their kids ready on time, all of them have help unlike most parents.

      They all managed it, except these two, who actually arrived after the king and queen, whose carriage was sitting at the entrance already.

    • Kate says:

      I agree. Even if the kids are fully ready on time that doesn’t preclude a meltdown. I feel very confident that Will’s approach to a meltdown would be yelling at the kid and/or Kate to take care of it and that also would explain the appearance of them fighting. Pretty sure 89% of my marital spats since having kids are precipitated by issues with the kids (and I’m not blaming the kids it’s just that their big emotions can easily overwhelm adults who are unprepared or not on the same page about how to deal with them).

      AND I’ve thought for a while everytime anyone says the monarchy is aging and boring without the Sussexes around that within a few years they’re going to be using the Wales kids for clickbait. Think of how much people cared about Will and Harry since they were preteens. It wasn’t only bc of Diana.

      • lanne says:

        It will be worse for the Wales kids bc of social media. There will be Instagram pages tracking their every moves. People will develop parasocial relationships with the kids far worse than Harry and William (I thought before Diana’s funeral it was grotesque the way that people were sobbing and pawing at those kids in public). I think that a lot of women in particular developed a “toxic mother in law” mentality with Harry that influenced that hatred that so many women felt toward Meghan, which was then stoked by the media. I think a lot of people low-key thought they could have a say in who Harry chose to marry, or that they would be able to “approve” or “disaprove” in any case. It will be even worse for George and Louis, and Charlotte will be body policed incessantly from puberty. I say this a lot, I know. But everything we have seen thus far related to young women in the public eye and how they are treated is a blueprint for the future. How can it be otherwise if the public refuses to have a reckoning with how we view women in public eye? And how women police other women? And how women police girls?

      • AnneL says:

        Can confirm! Getting my kids ready for big family events, specifically ones that involved getting dressed up and/or taking photos, precipitated more tension between me and my husband than just about anything. The kids are not to blame. No one really is. That’s just how it is with parenting sometimes.

        That said, I think the Wales had multiple people helping them get ready. I would bet each kid had a handler, maybe more than one. Will and Kate had people helping them and there was probably a “Coronation Adjunct” or three there too. It could have been a meltdown, but in this case I bet it was the dumb video combined with them not caring about being on time.

      • Nic919 says:

        Charlotte and Louis didn’t show any sign of emotional meltdowns at the ceremony or in that video. The ones who did have emotional responses were William and Kate who were throwing daggers at each other more than once that day.

      • lanne says:

        The kids are 5 and 8, not 1 and 4. Yes, 5-8 year olds have meltdowns, but these kids are old enough to understand the import of this day. And even if one of them did melt down, they’re not wrestling an 8 year old into her clothes the way you’d wrestle a 3 year old. And had the kids melted down, it would have been visible–red eyes, the shakes, etc.

      • Coldbloodedjellydonut says:

        IF the kids had a meltdown, they would not look so calm. The ones who looked like they’d had a meltdown are William and Kate.

        I used to be chronically late, I have ADHD and so does my son. I would NEVER be late for something like this. I don’t care if we had to get where we were going early, or park around the corner, we would have been there on time. I avoid being constantly late by having systems in place. If for some reason the systems fail (super sick so I don’t get up at my normal time and do my routine so I can’t be on my kid as much as I need to be), I will be late. I would make sure there were 20,000 extra systems for an event like this.

    • BeanieBean says:

      The WERE that late. The Cambridges were supposed to precede Camilla in the procession, with Charles last. The king is last. That is late late late & absolutely against all of their silly rules.

    • Jais says:

      You know what. Here’s the thing. We don’t know why they were late but the Wales and their team are perfectly fine with blaming it on the kids. Let’s say it was because of the kids, which I don’t necessarily believe, but let’s just say it was. The parents should be protecting them from the press. Either don’t explain why you were late or give a reason that doesn’t have to do with the kids in order to protect them. But here, we have the parents leaking through sources that it was the kids’ fault that they were late. They’re not telling their friends this. They are telling the PRESS this. They are using their kids to save their own egos. It’s pretty clear that different choices could be made here.

    • Jaded says:

      They only had 2 kids there and a legion of kiddie wranglers to get them ready. Will and Khate were too busy filming their fakakta Instagram video, and Khate was no doubt preening and fussing with her clothes, undeserved medals, sashes, brooches, hair, makeup and outlandish wannabe tiara and that’s what made them late. She and Will undoubtedly had a huge fight in the car because they both looked mad as hornets when they arrived. That is a HUGE eff-up given this was his father’s coronation day, and yet they still managed to screw it up. This isn’t like getting normal kids ready for church or a wedding or something, this is history, and the Wails blew it then threw their own kids under the bus. Shame on them.

      • Jaded says:

        @Kim.p — No, this is more BS from the Wails’s side. They have blamed their kids for making them late. The very fact that they’re coming out with this face-saving story should make it obvious. Do you honestly think the King of England’s carriage would actually arrive early? The whole ceremony was timed to the nanosecond. Did you not see the animosity and coldness on Charles’s face during Willnot’s pledge? They could barely look at each other and when they did it wasn’t with love and honour. This was clearly the fault of Willnot and Carenot and they should own it.

      • Nic919 says:

        William and Kate were supposed to be there at 10:45 am according to the order of service. And Charles would arrive at 10:53. Charles did not arrive prior to 10:45 so William and Kate were late.

        Plus charles would not be having fits if he knew he was early. He has done these events his entire life.

        Even William sensed how bad it was that they were late, hence his unwillingness to look at kate when they were waiting in line to proceed AFTER the king and queen and obviously not as the order of service stated.

        And clearly they were late if they toss the kids under the bus as an excuse.

  28. Rapunzel says:

    George was on time and with the other pages and Charles, right?

    It’s doubtful the children were the cause of the lateness. And even if they were, it’s tacky to blame them.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Scobie originally inc George in his statement about them being late but he was at BP and left with the King/ Given that they nannies would have made sure the kids were ready this is a sad pathetic excuse to cover the real reason they were late – their little video that no one paid any attention to.

  29. Mary Pester says:

    I cry BULLSHT, the children didn’t make them late at all. It was khates mirror. See the mirror caught a glimpse of Charlotte all ready for the clowning, and when Khate did her usual, “who is the fairest of us all?” the mirror said “when you were younger you were, even though your useing to much botox, YOU WERE, but Khate notice I say, you were, because Charlotte now leaves you in the shade (just like Megan used to)” screams and smashing glass fill the room and a little serf rushes in to clean up any mess. Khate runs out of the room straight to Charlotte and says,” YOU, YOU, young lady have made us late and you will be sacrificed to the press “. Louis holds Charlotte’s hand and says “sorry Charlotte, your turn today, but don’t worry, uncle Harry will be there, so he can make us smile”. Charlotte just looks Khate up and down and turns on her heel in disgust and says to Louis “yes he will, and not only that, uncle Harry won’t need prompt cards to know what to say. Of they go with BULLYAM muttering” oh god I hope that prompt card has little words and none more than 5 letters “

  30. HeyKay says:

    No snark about minor children from me.
    But W&K need to stop using these kids as cover/PR.
    We all know it was W&K trying to pull attention.

    Nannies, staff, etc. and W&K can’t hustle 3 kids to be on time?
    BS! Every parents does it everyday. School buses don’t wait for each kid.

  31. Selene says:

    Zara is always so dissapointing. We can count on her to be a negative everywhere.

  32. QuiteContrary says:

    Even if one of the kids somehow derailed the plans of W&K’s army of staff, it was crappy of them to blame the kids in the media.

  33. ales says:

    A team of nannies managing two children cannot have them ready on time. Do not believe this for one moment. It was 2 children, George had already left. I would imagine that Khate planned the lateness so that the media would focus on her, same reason she wore the tiara that was not a tiara. Find it interesting that George, Charlotte and Louis have their hair either tinted or bleached and are forced to dress like stepford characters. So much of the BRF behavior could be the story ” The emperor has new clothes” There are so many contradictory stories , this WC Fields quote matches them too “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS… .” They forget that so much information is available via the internet, lying and rewriting history, sooner or later becomes exposed. Their teams would not be capable of deleting or photoshopping absolutely everything.
    Reply

  34. L4Frimaire says:

    It’s wrong to blame their kids for being late. They were too busy with their fan cam project and knowing Will, probably being passive aggressive with time management. Camilla looked graceless and deer in headlights, especially when they were about to put that crown on her head, because after all this time she seems unprepared. They’re still shook over Harry showing up as expected, wearing a (very stylish) suit as expected, and leaving immediately after as expected. There’s not much more to say about this event. Done and dusted.

  35. Claire says:

    Does Scobie have actual royal sources that could give him this Intel? I thought he mostly reported on Harry and Meghan and wasn’t warmly welcomed by palace sources. But I’m definitely intrigued. I have a hard time believing they would have actually left late because as everyone has pointed out there are nannies and the kids would have all gone to the bathroom ahead of time etc. The only thing I would be able to think of would be if one of the kids has a tantrum or is crying in the car, I could see that they wouldn’t want to pull up to the church and get out while the kid is still having a tantrum or crying that’s all I can think of. The whole Kate and will getting in a fight in the car doesn’t make sense to me either. I think they could find another time to fight and even if they did fight, I don’t think it would affect their arrival time.

    • Bee says:

      Nice excuses. Blaming the kids is BS. The kids didn’t look upset. But their parents had serious frowny face going on.

      Willy and Kate are not getting along and this whole thing was stressful for them. They have the responsibility for being late, not the children.

      I think it was Willy who had the tantrum, tbh.

      • Nic919 says:

        William seemed mad while they were waiting to walk in. Probably because he knew how bad it looked for them to mess up the order of procession for an event that last happened 70 years ago.

  36. J. Ferber says:

    I don’t think K and W “plan” for a fight– it is their default mode. Of course they fought, of course it was not the kids’ fault and of course the parents blame the kids. Because it’s so “relatable” to people. It is NOT relatable to me. If this were H and M, they would be SKEWERED from start to finish. We all know this. But W and K get a pass. No. Awful people and awful parents. Not relatable.

  37. j.ferber says:

    I also think Charlotte and Louis in future should demand a separate car so they won’t be blamed for their parents’ lateness fiascoes.

  38. arhus says:

    Louis is constantly getting blamed for this and that – he’ll internalize that and act out as an adult I bet! Always being told he’s the bad kid.

  39. j.ferber says:

    They are setting up Louis for failure. And that is squarely the parents’ fault. George is the golden child. Ultimately, these two innocent and adorable children are not.

    • Anna says:

      I do nit understand how a parent can allow their child to be so publically judged, let alone do it themselves. They should protect the kids and know them well enough to know what their limits are. I also have a 5yo and would never expose my daughter like that, for the whole world to see her meltdown when I am aware she is not able to attend such an event, she is simply too young. And every parent would notice immediately that things will go south in a moment and intervene – leave with a child or have someone take care of them outside.

      Will and Kate are lousy parents and I am 100% sure they only participate in their lives in a limited way. Kate acted like this was the first time nanny wasn’t around to take Luis when he started acting up. And her focus was on the image all the time, never Louis.

  40. Feebee says:

    I feel for the Wales Children. I can’t believe how young/early that they are being thrown under the buses for their parents.

    Unless Harry’s lawsuits bear fruit, the press and other media will be allowed to do to them what they did to Harry. I really hope Harry’s book has given family and firm a clue as to the effect of being literally treated as a spare part can have on a kid. Of course we hope they don’t experience the devastating loss and callous aftermath of losing a parent in childhood. But I doubt any lessons will be learnt. One thing is clear, these people are super slow to learn anything.

    Good luck to this trio, but Charlotte and Louis especially.

  41. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Wails was incapable of being on time for any of her engagements with the Danish royals, so why would anyone believe that they were late because of the kids? I bet you the kids were ready and sat around waiting for Wails to get ready. Fails isn’t late to engagements.

  42. what's inside says:

    Shame on them. Karma will be a bitch.

  43. ExpatInTheUK says:

    When they said the children caused the delay, did they mean the 40-year-olds with childish mindsets?

    • Dhianna says:

      katie and billy need to grow up. Princess Charlotte was the one that everyone was looking at. Such a precious child. Wise beyond her years.

  44. j.ferber says:

    Dhiana, Please don’t say this. You KNOW Khate will start to be jealous of Charlotte soon enough, anyway.

  45. Robin Samuels says:

    There’s always an excuse for WandK, either from the media or their fan base. Parents of young children worldwide manage an early morning home with few bathrooms and no hired assistants. The children arrive at the bus stop on time, and the mother to work. Charlotte and Louis’s appearance was impeccable, thanks to their nanny. They’re school-age, and the morning routine is not so stressful anymore. It was the taping of the video, but why would WandK be honest and apologize rather than use their children as an excuse?
    How can an event that only happens because someone dies be viewed as cheerful? It was somber, and rightfully so, and the participants are forever looking forlorn. Zara eats too many edibles, and Andrew promises to be Charles’ Achilles heel. Meghan is not a working royal, so that she would be in row three with Harry and neither on the balcony even if she did attend.
    The use of flashcards is inexcusable, although the media managed to find an excuse for that. They know every word of the national anthem but can’t be trusted to remember two simple lines. Today William conferred a degree on his loyal partner-in-crime, Jason Knauf, and I did not see flash cards. William doesn’t like Charles. Their relationship is a facade, and it’s eating him from within. What binds them is their complicity in scapegoating Harry and Meghan. How long William can pretend is a mystery.

  46. Justjan says:

    My guess is Bill was trying to be late enough to not be expected to react to Harry. I can blame the kids, he thinks, and so he did… not caring that he is destroying their self esteem.

  47. AC says:

    I 1000% agree to this comment above that the people who are on time with kids are also the same people who are on time without kids . It’s the truest and accurate statement . I have a cousin who is always late to every single family event or gathering when she didn’t have any kids and she’s still late when she and her husband had kids. My mom would tell us when we were younger, you would know who a person is by their repeatable actions. And that’s also the most accurate statement to this day.

  48. Monlette says:

    My head cannon:
    Will: take that off your head. You are not wearing that. Camilla will have a screaming fit. You said you would be wearing flowers.
    Kate: Fine. I am not going.
    Will: Fine with me.
    Kate: Then go. Go without me.
    Will: I’m not going either.
    The kids heads are swiveling like a pingpong match.
    Kate: You have to go. You are the heir.
    Will: Yeah? What’s he going to do? Disown me and adopt Humpty Dumpty Bloody Parker-Bowles as his heir?
    Kate: You know he wants to.
    Will: Shut your gob!
    Kate: You shut yours!
    Charlotte: Mummy Daddy. We are already late.
    Will: Lord love a duck!! Get in the carriage everyone!