Prince William & Kate are the ‘new Camelot’… unlike the Duke & Duchess of Sussex!

July and August are usually the “silly season” when it comes to royal gossip. The Windsors are squirreled away in Balmoral or some undisclosed holiday location, and the royal reporters get bored and start writing up weird stories. Some summers, the gloves come off and the Mail or the Times will choose to do a very critical royal story too, something pointed and vicious. This is just an FYI: the summer silly season is upon us, and that’s why we’re getting some really random stories. Like this one! Page Six has a lengthy write-up about how Prince William and Kate are the New Camelot, only better because they’re not the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. I sh-t you not. First off, the Windsors need to stop obsessing over the Kennedys. Secondly, Will and Kate need to stop obsessing over their completely one-sided war with Harry and Meghan. Some highlights:

A masterclass in branding for the Waleses since QEII died: The couple’s lives — and those of their three children — changed in a heartbeat as they moved one rung closer to King and Queen and ushered in what royal watchers are describing as a “new Camelot.” Indeed, Kate and William have mounted a charm offensive like the one that saw President John F. Kennedy and First Lady Jackie Kennedy bewitch America and the world with their young family and style.

The New Kennedys: “William and Kate have created numerous official and informal photo opportunities, projecting a positive and united image as a couple,” global PR and branding guru Mark Borkowski told Page Six. “This curated and idealized image indicates their determination to own the narrative of hard-working, empathetic young royals…William and Kate’s image far outweighs Harry and Meghan’s social media issues and their attempt to conquer Hollywood.”

Winning the PR war!! And sources say that William and Kate, who like to document their lives with the help of glossy “home” videos made by filmmaker Will Warr, have figured out what it takes to win the PR war. “Kate and William have given us a master class in introducing the children to ‘The Firm’ [the nickname for the royal family industry],” one palace staffer told Page Six. “It’s a delicate way for the children to experience official engagements and get used to the public profile — and a careful balance when they’re of an age that they and their schoolmates will be aware of when their pictures are in the papers.”

The Wimbledon outing: “The recent appearance of Kate pre-tournament with the ball boys and girls was a great stunt,” said Borkowski. “So was filling the Royal Box [at Wimbledon] with the kids and the endless long lens shots of the children’s reactions. They clearly know there is a phony war with Harry and Meghan.”

Butt-touching like the Kennedys: There has even been a change in William and Kate’s body language — whereas they barely touched each other in public before, Kate can now be seen giving William a cheeky pat on the butt. “A lot of people remarked to me how relaxed they look out and about, they’re not just ribbon cutting,” said a source who knows the couple: “They’re both trying to deliver impact. They’re excited about the work they’re doing and with that is a sense of ease and confidence, they can get out there and really be their authentic selves.”

Will & Kate don’t employ consultants: “It was a big deal for them,” said the source, who confirmed the couple has not hired image experts. “There’s no army of marketing and branding people behind the scenes shaping everything. There’s a constant dialogue with their team about what’s important to them. But every element of what they do is thought about.”

Hugo Vickers, royal historian: Since the coronation, “Everything [Kate and Wiliam have done has been perfect … They get on with their duties, working within the system — unlike the Sussexes.”

Peg’s shadow court: One British socialite who knew both Charles and Diana intimately believes William will create his own Camelot-style “shadow court” of friends and “thinkers” — just like Charles did with Camilla at his country estate, Highgrove, before he was king. “It’s a chance to play king without the responsibilities,” said the source.

Camelot didn’t end well for the Kennedys: “I do believe they have some challenges ahead — the hamster wheel has an infinite cycle demanding positivity weekly,” said Borkowski. The source who knew Charles and Diana added: “They need keep on the right track. After all, Camelot did not end well for the Kennedys.”

[From Page Six]

This was especially bonkers, right? Several things are absolutely clear: Harry and Meghan live rent-free in Peg & Buttons’ heads; Peg and Buttons refuse to hire or listen to seasoned professionals and that’s why they keep f–king up; Peg and Buttons are desperate to appeal to Americans without bothering to actually learn anything about America or the American people. They think they can just declare themselves the new bewigleted Camelot and everyone will fall to their knees, crying over the keen comparison. Something I’ve always found a bit funny is that, to me, it was clear that Meghan was a big fan of Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, and if we’re drawing Kennedy comparisons… Harry and Meghan are much more JFK Jr/CBK-coded than anything else, and once you put that together, the idea of Peg and Buttons as JFK and Jackie… well, there’s nothing there. Will and Kate can’t PR their way out of a wet paper bag. Imagine citing Kate’s incessant attempts to grope William’s ass as evidence of their new Camelot status? These people (all of them) are so f–king tacky.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

169 Responses to “Prince William & Kate are the ‘new Camelot’… unlike the Duke & Duchess of Sussex!”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Aidevee says:

    Another day, another dollop of hollow, unsubstantive bilge.

    Crapalot, more like.

    • Exactly!! What planet are the the new couple from Camelot? The desperation is real and it seems Carole isn’t giving up on the dream. Most people know the Harry and Meg are charismatic and loving and kind and they do the work. Can’t and Peg are photo ops only. They have nothing.

      • Jan90067 says:

        The ONLY similarity they have with Jack & Jackie is that William is the cheating husband and Kate is the long suffering wife of a serial cheater.

        End of.

      • Pam says:

        Came here to say that! This really smells like Carole throwing a hail-Mary pass to save her decades-long pet project.

      • Aquitane says:

        I not only wonder what planet the Wales are living on but also what they are smoking. The Kennedy Camelot was a myth…no different than the original.

    • Jais says:

      Crapalot😂

    • Moxylady says:

      Wait. Sexually assaulting your husband – those ass grabs are 100% non consensual and unwanted – is the new Camelot?

      I can’t seem to recall Jackie grabbing the president’s ass.

      I do recall the President cheating 24/7.

      • BeanieBean says:

        It’s such a bad comparison on so many levels. Jackie never grabbed John’s butt, let alone in church!! Jackie, rich girl, actually worked for a living before getting married (‘girl reporter’); John, rich boy, actually served in the Navy & saw combat –PT-109, anyone?). I could go on. Even more salient is that we, as a country, have moved on. We’re not buying the whole Camelot thing anymore. We know what kind of husband JFK was. We know how the press kept things hidden. And the Kennedys didn’t deliberately set out on a ‘charm offensive’, they were simply charming. Keen & Billy Boy are not.

      • Meghan says:

        As a single woman I am quite far from an expert on the subject but I have dated/been in a relationship with a lot of dudes and I cannot remember ever giving them a “cheeky pat” on the butt. My kid? Yes, he gets a lot of booty taps, but someone I have romantic feelings for? My PDA consists of holding hands, wrapping my arm around their waist, a hand on their shoulder/upper back. I mean *maybe* there was some public “let’s see if we can get away with this grab-ass” but not at this level. Especially after the response William has to the grab-ass.

        Couples are different, maybe some do enjoy these cheeky pats but Kate…WILLIAM DOESNT LIKE IT.

      • Aquitane says:

        Jackie put up with JFK’s cheating because she was raised to do. Her father, John “Black Jack” Bouvier III was a notorious serial cheater. And after Jackie married JFK his father bribed Jackie with money and Jewels to turn the other cheek about JFK’s chronic philandering.

    • SarahCS says:

      Who sang ‘king of wishful thinking’? I’ve got that tune stuck in my head now.

      These people do know that writing this nonsense doesn’t make it true don’t they?

      • PunkPrincessPhD says:

        There’s a tune I haven’t heard for awhile! The band was Go West, though I heard it first as a pop punk cover by New Found Glory 😂

      • Nic919 says:

        I am old enough to remember that it was on the soundtrack of Pretty Woman.

    • Moxylady says:

      Ahhhh Scam-a-lot. I love the smell of grifting in the morning.

  2. Tessa says:

    Where do I start. Jackie was bright and cultured and I can’t see Kate overseeing decoration of the white house or inviting people from the performing arts be invited to the white house. Jackie had manners unlike keen. JFK was not lazy. Will is. JFK never exiled any of his own siblings. This story is no pathetic. As San Quayle was told you sir are no JFK can apply to William

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I don’t remember Jackie grabbing JFK’s butt even once!

    • Princess Peach says:

      Well JFK had affairs and so does William. So there’s that!

    • Lizzie says:

      As if Jackie would degrade herself to wait a decade for a proposal. I’m sure working-class Kate loves the comparison to beautiful socialite Jackie. Jackie had class, never in her life would she repeatedly flash in public. Jackie was chic and stylish; her hairstyle, pillbox hat and style were copied worldwide. She made Halston’s career by wearing his hats and almost broke it when she stopped wearing hats. Cheating high-profile husband and brown hair is all they have in common.

      • Lizzie says:

        The better comparison to the Kennedy is young QEII. Dashing couple with a young family. Most likely Will will be pushing sixty when he becomes king.

      • Eating Popcorn says:

        Jackie also became estranged from her sister for a little while by marrying Ari Onasis, who her sister had dated.

      • Ellie says:

        Jackie had it all. Beauty, grace, money and class. We ,at the time thought Jack was amazing and adoring. Now we know he cheated constantly but still loved Jackie. He served his country, loved his family and was a wonderful president. I remember where I was and what I was doing when he was shot, like I remember Diana’s death and the twin towers. Jack never scowled when looking at his wife, he praised her and was proud of her. No comparison as far as Camelot – 1000 days in the White House and Willy and Kate. None.

    • Moxylady says:

      Wait. Wait. EARTHSHOT. It’s named after John Kennedey’s project.

      He went to the Kennedy library and met with the Kennedy family although he didn’t seem to know who was who or what their areas of interest and expertise are.

      So he desperately wants to attach his name to the Kennedy name. Probably because he thinks of John Kennedy as the most beloved American and he needs to steal America’s love away from his brother.

      And yet what is hilarious is that no one is mentioning John. Just Jackie. Because Jackie was Camelot. Not John.

      Keen is no Jackie. And Willie – he’s just not anything.

      • Lady D says:

        He is so desperate to appear impressive, he thinks hooking up with the Kennedys is the way to do it. Yet once again this tool does not do his homework thus cannot identify the ones best able to help(elevate) him. I wait for the day his arrogance is his undoing. I soothe myself with the thought of him being fired while on tour and still stupid enough to pull a colonial-cosplay jeep stunt.

      • Ellie says:

        Years ago, when Diana was separated I hoped she would meet John Jr. He was killed in his plane crash with his wife and s in law two years after Diana’s death. Another sad memory for all of us.

  3. Tessa says:

    Dan Quayle

  4. seaflower says:

    There is so much spin in this story, I’m motion sick.

  5. Tessa says:

    The Kennedy’s did not go in for butt touching.

  6. Noor says:

    The Wales are overselling themselves. Are we celebrities or royals?.

    It is very odd that everything the Wales do is analysed in the media from the prism of the Sussexes .

    • Melissa says:

      I can just see this discount store brand (Great Value? Nice?) Camelot two getting more and more frustrated that they can’t get their planned Pick Me! behavior into the press without the stories continue to compare them to H & M….they have escalated to butt-grabbing already, what will be next?

  7. Millennial says:

    I guess in the sense that JFK cheated on Jackie left and right, sure.

  8. Aidevee says:

    So much desperate reaching.

  9. Tessa says:

    Jackie worked full time before marriage plus she later worked for a major publishing company.

    • Giddy says:

      Jackie was educated, intelligent, knew antiques and art, had great taste, could hold her own with politicians and diplomats, and spoke French. Kate gives her husband unwelcome pats on the ass. One of these things is not like the other.

      • Aidee Kay says:

        Even though JFK was a dirty cheating dog of a husband, in his last few months of life he mentioned that after his presidency, he would seek an appointment as ambassador to Italy, “because Jackie will like that.” Man knew his wife. Jackie would have thrived as the top co-diplomat from the U.S. to a country full of art, culture, fashion, history. That would have been a great phase for that couple.

      • Debbie says:

        Also, even though he was president at the time, when JFK saw how well-received his wife was abroad, didn’t he publicly state that he would always be remembered as “the man who accompanied Jackie Kennedy to France” (or some such foreign country?). This man did not have the Windsor curse/weakness of being intimidated by his wife’s accomplishments or charisma.

    • Deering24 says:

      She was Toni Morrison’s editor, as well as for many other excellent writers.

  10. Sugarhere says:

    I am absolutely not worried about this hilarious piece: I read it as Page Six trolling Will an Kate. The far-fetched, unrealistic analogy with the glamorous Kennedys is what gives the article away. This is pure desecration with conedic overtones.

    John Kennedy had a head full of hair, a recognizably kissable Irish facw, and one of those smiles to die for, while Bullyiam…
    Each of Jacky’s clothes made an avant-garde fashion statement 60 years ago, while Wigs & Buttons looks like a vintage 1950s botched Barbie.

    Additionally, the phrase “playing king” when referring to William’s undertakings sounds like abother dig, to me. With such a deprecating definition, Prince Wails turns as flat as a cartoon or a toy story character.

  11. girl_ninja says:

    Lot of premature deaths and affairs in the Kennedy Camelot crew. They better be careful what they wish for. Creepy ass co-players.

    • Seraphina says:

      That evilness goes back to Joseph Kennedy. They need to leave that Pandora’s box closed.

    • Well I guess they have a bit in common with Jack and Jackie the affairs. Is this what they are trying to tell us with this story? We already know.

    • SarahLee says:

      @girl-ninja, I read that last line as almost threatening. They have to do certain things because otherwise “things did not end well for Camelot.” WTH?

  12. Eurydice says:

    Camelot didn’t end well for Arthur and Guinevere, either. JFK JR. and Carolyn were only married for 4 years before they died – they didn’t have time to be anything except famous and field gossip about infidelities and divorce. And John and Jackie’s life looked more like Charles and Diana’s, with turbulence and infidelities on his part. W&K’s PR is so lame and stupid – it’s obvious they don’t hire consultants.

    • Tessa says:

      Joe Kennedy had to persuade Jackie to stay on the marriage allegedly leaving her some money.

      • Eurydice says:

        A biography which used some of her diaries said that Joe offered her $1 million after she caught John having sex with an aide, that all the brothers were after her and that she was afraid to be in the same room with Bobby. Of course, everything was so opaque in those days, so who knows.

    • Kittenmom says:

      Thank you! That was my thought the entire time. The original Camelot couple (Arthur & Guinevere) broke apart in the end 🤷🏻‍♀️ so who wants to be likened to that mess!

      As to the Kennedy comparisons — SNORT. Kate in particular could never measure up to Jackie in intelligence, style and class.

      • JanetDR says:

        @kittenmom Right?! Especially in Britain, you would think the first thought at the Camelot reference would be Arthur and Guinevere! That didn’t end well.

      • Margaret says:

        I immediately thought of the fictional Arthur and Guinevere, not the Kennedys. I’m guessing a lot of members here are American. I thought the reference to Arthurian legend was an odd one for this uninspiring couple.

    • Nic919 says:

      The American media also protected JFK from reporting on his multiple affairs, in a gentleman’s agreement that is similar to what the British press do today.

  13. Harla A Brazen Hussy says:

    In terms of their comparison to Camelot, Jack did cheat on Jackie a lot so the Wales’ have that going for them.

    • Tessa says:

      The Wales are lazy. I guess the only thing they do have in common is Will cheating
      I agree.

  14. maisey says:

    i mean, Camelot didn’t work out for Arthur or Lancelot or Guinevere either… Camelot … doesn’t work out (except for that one brief shining moment)!, and i would expect English folk to know it.

    • SueBarbri33 says:

      I came here to post this! Like…I mean, I prefer the Kennedy’s to anything the British Monarch produces, but Camelot was their story first! The Kennedy’s co-opted it at the last minute via the musical, but (until Fall of 1963) Camelot has always meant Round Tables and swords and knights and crowns and whatever else people think of when they think of kings and queens! Why give that away? I understand that this particular piece was written for an American audience, but it’s still stupid. Additionally, Will went to the Kennedy library last year and met with Caroline and her kids, and it was clear that he had no idea who she was or what he was supposed to talk about with her. He has no interest in JFK beyond that it’s a name that he came across in a book one time at Eton. It’s kind of like that stupid commercial for car insurance that quotes Thomas Paine–it’s just name recognition and totally disconnected from whatever they’re trying to sell. Boo!

      • Deering24 says:

        SueBarbri33–_thank_ you. That Thomas Paine Car Shield ad makes no sense—and only inspires me to see if the owner is a raving MAGAT, not to try his company. Ugh…

  15. Honey says:

    Who really in the USA, under the age of 40 (hell, 55), actually knows about or even remembers Jackie O, the Kennedy’s, and Camelot? Really? Or the supposed allure of Jackie Kennedy (which wasn’t shared by all)?

    As I think about this, perhaps the audience to which William & Kate are trying to appeal to is the 60 – 65+ year-old set (likely the author’s age cohort as well). I just don’t think there is huge appeal or relatedness there for William & Kate in the age range that is +\- 10 years on either side of their own.

    • Seraphina says:

      Jackie did all she could to secure the money for herself, thus marrying Aristotle. Jackie is more Ma Middleton, except Jackie had actual class and sophistication which helped make her conniving ways a bit more palatable to the masses.

      • JanetDR says:

        As I recall, she did everything she could to protect her family. She was in the car and saw who shot Jack. It was no love match with Ari, but she knew they would be safe.

      • Snoodle says:

        Jackie was born to the American upper class, marrying well is what upper class women DID back then.

        Admittedly new money but still upper class, and the Kennedys were at the time only further up the social ladder due to their history of public office. Her maternal grandfather was a VERY successful real estate developer in NYC at the turn of the century, stockbroker/investment banker (as in member of the board of Chase National Bank for 35 years), and ran a successful law firm for quite some time. Her mothers’ second husband was one of the heirs to Standard Oil. Her father was a third generation stockbroker in New York.

        And really, what could be more American than a socialite marrying some displaced European aristocrat?

    • Becks1 says:

      But even the 60-65 year olds aren’t going to have the same impression of Jackie Kennedy. My grandmother (who was born in 1924) loved her, but my mother (born in 1951) is much more meh on her. Like she just doesnt really have an opinion on her, you know? My mom was 12 when JFK died. She remembers it and she remembers Jackie in the 60s etc and her marriage to Aristotle but the association with Camelot and this happy little family was much stronger with my grandmother. It’s just an outdated mention at this point in time.

      • Nic919 says:

        While there was mystique for Catholics even outside of the states and shock when JFK and RFK were assassinated, so much has come out since then, that it’s not a family held in high regard. Chappaquidick was the start but now with RFK Jr and his anti science and anti vax stuff, they are just a rich family.

    • Moxylady says:

      I’m 41 and the only reason I know much about them is that I was interested in American history from the end of the depression till we landed on the moon. As a child. Mostly I was deeply into astronomy and Kennedy starting the moon race was a big deal for me. Plus we were a Catholic famkly so they were royalty to us and a constant use of how oppressed white Catholics are.

      Jackie was captivating. I thought John’s career in the military was wild.

      But most of all …. Once I found out about the Kennedeys. Like the real story. The cheating. Their horrific father. What he did to his daughter Rose. The pathetic excuse for a mother never visiting her child.
      I have a deep seated disgust with their power mad machinations and behavior.

      • suugrpop says:

        “But most of all …. Once I found out about the Kennedeys. Like the real story. The cheating. Their horrific father. What he did to his daughter Rose. The pathetic excuse for a mother never visiting her child. I have a deep seated disgust with their power mad machinations and behavior.”

        However to paint them all on one brush would also be dishonest. Then we would have to put the sins of Harry’s family on him and his kids. That wouldn’t be fair would it?.

  16. JCallas says:

    I shudder to think the names Meghan would be called if she patted Harry’s butt in public.

    • Kittenmom says:

      “Brazen Hussy” comes to mind

      • Debbie says:

        Only in polite company, @Kittenmom. And I can’t believe how outraged I feel on William’s behalf at seeing him angle his body away from Kate’s groping hand, and the discomfort on his face. Meanwhile, Kate bends over him like a vulture, as if she’s asking him what’s wrong. I would readily caption those photos thus: “Excuse me sir, is this woman molesting you?” She;s such a scuzz.

    • Barb Mill says:

      Meghan always places her hand on Harry’s back. It’s a gesture of support, like I am here, I’m with you. Patting someone’s butt in public is just gross. Especially when they have a long history of rare PDA. If Kate thinks that it is just playful affection she is missing the mark. It might be seen that way after a polo match or something like that but not during that 2nd coronation. It’s especially bad that William doesn’t like it. She is desperate.

  17. Julie says:

    Isn’t Page Six an American rag ? WTH is going on?
    why are they blowing smoke up the Wales and why the need to drag on H&M?
    what’s with the onslaught of negative news abt H&M in the American media ? ive noticed this since the car chase , and it’s just been relentless

    • MoBiMom says:

      Murdoch owned!

    • Nic919 says:

      Page six has also been carrying UK centric stories from the Sun about a day or so after they are in the UK. Murdoch is just furthering his right wing agenda.

  18. Brassy Rebel says:

    Oh God. Desecrating the names of Lerner and Lowe.

  19. Miranda says:

    Could they possibly lay it on any thicker? Jesus, what a nauseating read. The only thing William shares with JFK is a fondness for infidelity. And with the Jackie comparison, we see once again that tendency for Kate and those who praise her to latch on to the identity of an iconic woman, like Diana or QEII, and reduce that woman to her most vapid, shallow traits. This does no service to Kate, nor to the icon. What they want us to read into this, for example, is that Kate is a stylish 1960s housewife (which is what they believe Jackie was. That and nothing more). And that is SUCH a weird thing to want people to think of you as in 2023, anyway.

  20. Hayley says:

    Tabloids push these lies about how loved the imitation crabmeat known as Keen and Pegging are, but get embarrassed when the pair show up in the US, and get booed loudly.

  21. Jais says:

    Mounting another charm offensive? Soooo patronizing and well offensive. And modeling it after Camelot, two Americans? Why? They’re so embarrassing.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Right? As others have stated, Camelot is THEIR story! Arthur, Guinevere, Lancelot! There were three in that marriage! 😉

      • Snoodle says:

        And Gwen ran off with Lance and Arthur suffered a mortal wound, FFS. Like, there are NO options that makes this look GOOD.

        As an aside, that is why I tend to prefer adaptations of the story that center Merlin, in the role of ‘Only Sane Man Wondering Why Everybody Around Him Is Incapable Of Keeping It In Their Hose’. That one from 1998 with Sam Neill and Helena Bonham Carter was amazing.

  22. EasternViolet says:

    More doubling down to shift focus that the Wales are estranged, as well as awkward and stilted in public. Now its like code — when harry and megan are discussed, it is to distract the readers that the wales marriage really is a fairy tale because its most likely over and they are in a strictly business type relationship at this point.

  23. Harper says:

    Burger King thinks if he can say the word Camelot a lot the American people will fall in line, and in love, with him. He must be horribly upset by the fact that he doesn’t have his mother’s popularity here. Also, he really doesn’t understand the American press, that all the false stories are filed under gossip columns and that real news takes up our front pages. As for his obsession with linking his stale marriage to the Kennedys, he is about a generation too late. The current young Kennedy offspring is pretty much unknown and doesn’t have the same mass appeal that they did when JFK Jr and Maria Shriver were in their 20s and 30s. Now we are left with that Jack Schlossberg moaning on Instagram about how much time it takes out of his life to dine out. It’s wonderful, however, to know that Burger King is relying on Lee Thompson’s input, as he is so out of touch and will continue to lead Burger King down the wrong path and thus we get the laughs.

    • suugrpop says:

      “Now we are left with that Jack Schlossberg moaning on Instagram about how much time it takes out of his life to dine out. ” It was a joke.

  24. Amy Bee says:

    They may not have image consultants but Kate has a Meghan lookbook and they have studied videos of Harry and Meghan in public and their old instagram account. Everything that Harry and Meghan were criticised for William and Kate are now being praised. The problem was always that Harry and Meghan overshadowed William and Kate and made them look dull and boring.

  25. OriginalMich says:

    Nah. They are more like the Reagans. Stiff, judgmental, right-wingers.

    • Lady D says:

      “Mr. Gorbachev, Tear down this wall!” June 12, 1987 A powerful moment in an otherwise weak & lackluster career.

    • Gabby says:

      Regardless of his politics, I think we can agree that Reagan knew how to relate to people without publicly clenching his jaw. He could pull off a joke. WanK are more like the DeSantis Klan.

  26. Lala11_7 says:

    A MASTERCLASS IN BRANDING 😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣😂😛😜🤪😝🤗

  27. BlueNailsBetty says:

    Camelot by Wish/Shein, maybe.

  28. AnneL says:

    “They know it’s a phony war with the Sussexes.”

    Wrong.

    They are the ones who started the war and keep fighting it. It’s phony to the Sussexes, who are ignoring them. It’s very real to Will and Kate.

    And William doesn’t find Kate’s butt pats “cheeky.” He finds them grimace-worthy.

  29. Becks1 says:

    This article is bonkers. Will and Kate are trying to make an impact because she’s been touching his butt in public? They are winning the PR war with the Sussexes because….they make those awful videos and post them on IG?

    At least it acknowledges that they are using the kids for PR. Second article in a week where that is openly admitted. Very interesting.

    • Eurydice says:

      The article is bonkers, but the desperation is real. All that talk about W&K being the saviors of the monarchy is real. But it’s too much to expect anyone, let alone these two nitwits, to make the monarchy relevant in the 21st century. There should have been a long-term plan, starting with Elizabeth and with Charles preparing his way in advance.

  30. Blujfly says:

    The new British born editor certainly is on board with the embiggening campaign.

    Camelot – a comparison made after thr assassination by Jackie Kennedy to JFK’s biographer – ended because the President was murdered after many years of vilification and othering from what is now the right wing because of his religion and later, support for civil rights. “Staying the course” had little to do with it.

  31. Beverley says:

    The Egg as the dashing JFK???
    😄😂🤣😁😆

  32. ThatsNotOkay says:

    This is propaganda ahead of William’s trip to New York. They’re trying to get the people who read Murdoch’s rags to give, at minimum, one shit about him, but I’m sorry to say, two shits are out of the question. And this is all coded criticism and snark anyway. This family is so self-involved and self-righteous they never realize they’re being made fun of with every single article.

  33. Eliora says:

    Yikes, someone wrote this about a future monarch and stupidly thinks it’s a good thing? Ignoring the nonsensical comparisons to the Kennedys. This isn’t giving what they think it’s giving. Why in the world should a future King and Queen’s news worthiness or likability be solely dependent on how NOT like the Sussexes they are? Not to mention that the only real criticism of the Sussexes in this piece is that the press hates the Sussexes refusal to give the media access. This just goes to show that if Harry and Meghan were to ever “play the game” like the press wants, the press will gleefully kick Will and Kate into the gutter to cover their gold standard couple, the Sussexes. How utterly embarrassing for Will and Kate.

    • Beverley says:

      It must keep Bullyam up at night, knowing that his despised baby brother and a biracial American are the actual gold standard couple. The future king hasn’t had a decent night’s sleep since luminous Meghan showed up on Harry’s arm!

    • Julia says:

      Harry and Meghan aren’t working royals so they are under no obligation to give access to the media. How can a future King and Queen think they are competing with two non working royals who live in the USA? Completely bonkers! Is anyone except dedicated royals watchers interested in any of this nonsense? I’m British and I don’t know anyone who is particularly interested in Will and Kate.

  34. Over it says:

    Yes, because when I look at wank clenched jaw and fist and buttons permanently fake smile or glassy eyes look, I immediately think, happy , stable togetherness. . I suggest they hire sow someone, anyone to help them with their or because at this moment, it’s really bad .

  35. notasugarhere says:

    Is this another broad hint about William’s cheating?

    • Snoodle says:

      I think that your suspicion is dead-on accurate.

      This all has a lot of the same energy as that ‘Kate the Great’ article, and I’m pretty sure that headline was actually a vicious allusion to a woman most aristocrats dislike on general principle.

      Catherine the Great usurped her husbands’ throne, attempted to usurp her son via snatching her grandson away to be raised by her, and most importantly cast a HUGE amount of doubt upon the validity of the heir by having affairs before having produced any children.

      Now, we have no indication of Katie Keen doing anything THAT bad, but I can certainly see the aristos saying that she’s trying to usurp Willy in the public eye and/or their arguing that Ma and Pa Middleton have too much influence over the heir(s).

      And the Kennedys? Like, sure people think of the glamour, but then it’s almost immediately followed by the unrelenting and remorseless cheating. Well, that and JFK getting shot and the conspiracy rabbit hole, but still. Top 3 things about the Kennedys.

  36. aquarius64 says:

    The Kennedy name doesn’t have the same appeal as in the days of JFK. RFK Jr. is the face of the family now, an anti-vaxxer who made some very ignorant statement to where Kennedys have publicly disowned him. He is a whack job running for the Democratic nomination for president, a useful idiot for the GOP. US media only address Camelot as some voters have fond memories of JFK but it has not helped RFK Jr in the polls. Biden still leads by a wide gap. And latching onto a president who was a serial cheater and a widow who negoitiated her second marriage as a business arrangement is not the flex the Waleses think. Not every American is bowed over on them (see Boston tour). In fact the BRF is mostly celebrity gossip, they make the news for weddings, funerals, Con-a-Nation, Harry’s lawsuits.

    • AnneL says:

      I saw an RFK Junior sign in a yard on Long Island a few days ago, right across the street from a friend’s house. Yikes! But that’s been the only one so far. Pathetic man.

    • suugrpop says:

      Why should that nut job be the face of the family? by that logic should Andrew be the face of the BRF and by extension Harry? (since he is Harry’s uncle)

      “And latching onto a president who was a serial cheater” opposed to the many faithful husbands of the House of Windsor? Charles is right there lol.

      “And a widow who negotiated her second marriage as a business arrangement is not the flex the Waleses think” The Widow was protecting her kids, not some weird concept.

  37. MsIam says:

    Well JFK and Jackie would never have been booed in Boston of all places. Another day, another dumb puff piece about the Wails.

  38. Tamra says:

    Well, the Kennedy’s are/were a tragic family, just like the Wingnut’s!

    • Mary Pester says:

      Sorry, sorry I would have posted sooner, but I was busy trying to mop up my cup of tea that I had spilt laughing. Talk about dammed with faint praise 🤣🤣🤣they have just admitted that NOTHING is real with this Family OK, their “couples” photos are staged, their children’s photos are staged and THEY make it so. The only conclusion you can possibly make is that the whole “happy family”, thing is A MYTH just like camelot! William ain’t no knight of the round table, he’s a Prince of the Palace bald heads and katey ain’t no maiden in distress, she’s the dragon that Harry saved Megan from
      This is lot is more like the Mcbeths or Borgias for “family”

    • Mallory says:

      Joe Kennedy lobotomized his daughter for not fitting into perfection, causing her to have permanent paralysis, then sent her away to be isolated & forgotten. Weird family to tie yourself too, but I see this parallel…..

      • Tessa says:

        He did this when his wife was away. Just got that operation for their daughter.horrible.

      • suugrpop says:

        I mean the house of Windsor did the same thing to their own cousins. The Kennedy children were minors when it happened and weren’t even told the truth.

  39. Lizzie says:

    Do the continued references to JFK and Camelot speak to the age of palace courtiers?

    • SueBarbri33 says:

      Right? Camelot is an outdated reference now. Everything they launch always seems creaky and outdated. This is kind of like how Edward keeps flopping around in the suits he must have inherited from his father or grandfather. Just an odd, old-fashioned choice.

  40. BeanieBean says:

    The gall of saying things didn’t end well for Camelot! After setting up Keen & Billy Boy as the Next Camelot? Do they even realize what they’re saying?

  41. QuiteContrary says:

    Jackie came up with the Camelot image, and quoted the musical, in an interview right after her husband was assassinated. It was genius — a way to frame her husband’s fleeting presidency in a vivid way that she knew would capture the grieving nation’s attention.
    “Don’t let it be forgot,” she said, “that for one brief, shining moment there was Camelot.”

    Kate doesn’t have one-hundredth the intelligence of Jackie Kennedy. All she has is a cheating husband.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      It wasn’t that great an image to invoke even then, tbh. The actual story of Arthur and Guinevere was about infidelity, court treachery, and murder. Theodore H. White, the presidential journalist she gave the interview to about 10 days after the assassination, tried to minimize the Camelot imagery because he realized the potential for backlash and embarrassment. He probably knew about her husband’s dalliances (as did she). But she was focused on the romantic images in the Broadway show’s cast album and was undeterred. Thus, the first draft of history about a presidential assassination was based on a Broadway musical cast album. Only then did the sixties really begin.

  42. Ameerah M says:

    Well JFK was a serial adulterer and Jackie looked the other way for the entirety of their marriage so maybe that’s what they mean by K & W being just like Camelot.

  43. Sunny O says:

    The PR campaign to cast William & Kate as hard working & empathetic isn’t working.

    Especially the empathetic part. It’s so not working.

  44. Maxine Branch says:

    My understanding of Camelot means an idyllic place of happiness. When watching the Windsors from afar, I do not see happiness, what I see is scandal and ridicule. The Wales’s are just performative clowns and Charles and Camilla are just old and tired. My 21st century version of Camelot would be the Sussexes who are currently living their best lives and dreams in as idyllic setting loved up with gorgeous children, surrounded by good friends.

  45. BW says:

    I’m pretty sure Camelot means King Arthur cheated on Queen Guinevere with his own sister. And Queen Guinevere cheated on Arthur with Sir Lancelot. Yup, Camelot seems about right.

    • Snoodle says:

      Let’s not forget the times that Arty cheated on Gwen with HER sister…although from what I remember both of those were a case of mistaken identity on Arthurs’ part, and Evil Scheming Wench Behavior on the ladies parts.

      Aaaah, the Middle Ages. So classy.

    • notasugarhere says:

      And Arthur himself being the result of cheating.

  46. L4Frimaire says:

    Yeah that really is a bonkers article. Where is the reality in this? William visibly shrinks away from Kate’s attempts to grope him. When they describe the couple as “perfect”, that’s a red flag. Not saying rising to the challenge, not navigating new roles, but perfect, which means boring and doing the bare minimum. I see that they still can’t help themselves by mentioning the Sussexes, who are being really private right now and basically minding their business. I certainly wouldn’t want to be compared to the Kennedy’s, esp. with RFK Jr. out in the wild being crazy right now. There is a lot of double meaning and shade on this really weird article. Anyway, good luck with that Camelot thing. Comparing yourself to an era from 60 years ago. Really relevant.

  47. Jaded says:

    There’s a lot of thinly veiled shade in this write-up (read drivel) that actually makes WanK appear to be nothing more substantive than “carefully curated images”. This isn’t Camelot, it’s “Spamalot” and to put them in the same sentence with the Kennedys is antithetical. Jack and Jackie had more class, intelligence, poise, charisma and charm than the Wanks will ever have no matter how many fake and fawning articles are written about them. Yes Jack was a serial philanderer while Jackie put up with it quietly and stoically , that’s probably the ONLY thing they have in common.

  48. bubblegum dreams says:

    What is this obsession with a long dead couple. They do realise that JFK has been dead for over 60 years and Jackie for over 20 years.
    The Wales are just like the Kennedys says No One Ever. No one over here pines for the Kennedys because to us they are just part of history. The only people who remembers them are people my grandparents age.

  49. Beech says:

    The Prince of Wales & Princess of Wales and their staff know nothing of King Arthur, not a historical figure, and how his reign panned out? Not to mention the Broadway musical? Or anything of JFK, a world class satyr? During his administration, he shared a mistress with a crime boss. Or that Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy Onassis, in some, ways, admirable, but also a myth maker. She spoke with Theodore H. White and came up with the Camelot spin, never mind, as others pointed out, things didn’t pan out in the Arthurian legacy. The royals would know better or should. One might call them and their team dim.

  50. Alison says:

    So they’re styling themselves on the AMERICAN president and AMERICAN First Lady. Hmmm. Whenever they refer to Meghan as the AMERICAN actress, both words are used very pejoratively. Honestly, BM, decide, American good or bad. But then, anything about or connected to Meghan is bad. sigh

    • Blujfly says:

      Even the Crown made up an entirely fictitious interaction where the Kennedys, whose manners were flawless and who had already been accepted and greeted at the British court when JFK’s father was ambassador to the court of St James, were rubes.

  51. @Alison. That’s true. I thought the rotas and the RF don’t like Americans because they’re abrasive and rambunctious. Why are they styling themselves after the former American First Family? And besides William can never be JFK. And neither can Kate be the next Jackie. JFK and Jackie are of a different breed. This is PR desperation from their PR masters Kate and William themselves. Hubris both.

  52. Wannabefarmer says:

    Honestly, I think these writers are throwing shade in this case. The other thing is they are writing about H&M but just substitute w&k or vice versa depending on the topic.

  53. Thea says:

    The British Royals who disparaged both Meghan and Wallis Simpson for having American heritage sure are desperate to ingratiate themselves with Americans.

  54. Saucy&Sassy says:

    I think they’ve just about got the era correct. They should have gone back 70 years ago rather than 60, but they’re darned close. WanK are playing the Tory game so 1950s is about right. So, I’ll give them that. However, do they know that JFK was a Democrat?

    I don’t know who first came up with the idea of selling the Wailses as the Kennedys and then slapping Camelot on for good measure, but they really missed the mark. I guess they’ll just have to wait and see that the picked the wrong ‘brand’. I was in grade school when JFK died. Trust me, when I think of the Kennedys I don’t think of Camelot. It was the 60s. Does anyone remember the 60s as Camelot?

    You know the best thing to come out of this? Their MAGA base are not going to be happy they’re being compared to Democrats. You gotta luv this stuff.

    • Korra says:

      Except the MAGA base has cognitive dissonance when it comes to the Kennedys. Trump’s base welcomes conspiracy theories about JFK still being alive and working alongside Trump to expose shadowy governments. And Melania always welcomes comparisons to Jackie O. Additionally, Ron DeSantis and Casey DeSantis (and their chronically online fans) are trying to position his presidential campaign as the next coming of Camelot, which includes her pathetic attempts to cosplay as Jackie O.

      If this upsets the MAGA base, it’s because the Wales should have stayed in their lane and not attempt to compete with the Trumps or the DeSantises as the next Camelot, lol.

  55. tamsin says:

    “Camelot” was a post Kennedy creation if I recall correctly. Jackie created this illusion after her husband was assassinated. This has been debunked many times by historians in the many books since written about the Kennedy years. Jack did manage to inspire a generation, and Jackie was a very intelligent and glamorous figure. She was also quite a calculating person who did well for herself and her children seemingly after Kennedy’s assassination. The article does have the slightly passive aggressive tone that a lot of the ostensibly embiggening articles of the Waleses seem to employ.

  56. jferber says:

    John Kennedy was assassinated at the age of 46 in a horrifying act that still traumatizes our nation. Tell them to back the eff off the American angle, since they skewer Duchess Meghan for BEING an American and with their vileness and hatred have raised security concerns for the whole family. Give me an effing break by comparing these two mediocrities with the brilliant JFK and the glamorous backbone of the family, Jackie Kennedy Onassis. The Brits have a helluva nerve with this odious comparison. Don’t you have anyone brilliant or glamorous in your OWN histories that you haven’t driven out of your nation with your bigotry and bullying? You coulda had the bad bitches and now you’re left with the trifling Middletons. Own it. You deserve them. I hope they drain your coffers.

    • Snoodle says:

      I think the most recent glamorous Royals they had (aside from H&M) were Edward VIII (a.k.a. Eddie the Abdicator/Eddie the Nazi) and Princess Margaret (whose whole media thing was more of the ‘glamour girl tragically cut down by the institution who turned to drink’ variety than anything else).

      Real brilliance and glamour in the UK tends to concentrate in the Middle Class (aristos mixing with them is still considered utterly abominable to many aristos) and amongst actors (who are only a few decades removed from being Untouchables as far as the aristocracy is concerned). And all the politicians are waaay too divisive, except maybe Winston Churchill who was, like, anti-glamour and a well-known jackass, and comparing ANY royal aside from Queenie to him would inspire an online TIDAL WAVE of scorn and mockery.

  57. bisynaptic says:

    This shit will rot your brain.

  58. Penguin says:

    Just a wee bit of reader feedback. I don’t understand why this site keeps repeating the same article about these people. Every week there are at least six articles about the Royal Family, and the content is always the same. Nothing about Meghan and Harry is ever true; everything the rest of them do is awful, and their clothes are awful, and they’re ugly, etc. And you can’t even filter it in case you’re interested in something else. I like a bit of Royal gossip as much as the next person, but could we get some new material or move this to another site and get some writers to put together other fun content?

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Penguin, there is other content. You don’t need to read the royal stuff. It’s a choice.

    • Jais says:

      Well, you can start a gossip website with a group of writers and only include the gossip you want. There’s a solution.

    • Ann says:

      So you never bother to read the articles about the royals or read the non-royal articles?

  59. Izzy says:

    Considering how f’d up and cursed the Kennedy family has been, if they really want to keep that comparison, let them have it.

  60. AC says:

    100% agree with Kaiser that WK seems so obsessed to win Americans 😀. Esp they see that more than 2/3 of Gen Z favors HM compared to boring WK. And Harry is more popular in the USA than William. Well for one thing Harry lives here now and embracing American life so he’s waaaay more relatable than William.
    I’m pretty sure WK are envious that Meghan’s show Suits is breaking streaming records in Netflix – even though we don’t get to see Meghan much as she’s been for the most part out of the spotlight except for the British Press’s gaga obsession over her. I also saw how many Twitter users have commented that Meghan was quite good in her role and never understood why the BP is so negative of her. And majority of Twitter commenters now agree why Harry fell head over heals for her 😀..
    WK were at Wimbledon and no one really cared 😀.

  61. JustMe says:

    The new Crapalot, nothing like Camelot.

  62. AC says:

    Not to mention the BRF and the firm wanted HM out of the UK which they thought was going to be brilliant plan to get rid of them. They prob can’t believe that HM are successfully thriving in the USA where they are more relevant than any other member of the BRF.

  63. Carolind says:

    Interestingly I am reading a book about Diana at the moment by one of these people who advised her about health etc and this person writes that Diana told her that she, Diana, had slept with John Jnr. It was a fantastic experience but they decided a relationship was not possible.

    For some reason I think of Diana as being a lot older than him but he was actually about 7 months older than Diana.

    • Tessa says:

      I doubt that story is true. Jfk Jr was in love with Carolyn bessette and she was living with him at that time. It was that Simone person who wrote this about Diana. And she collaborated with Ingrid on a book which says it all.

      • Carolind says:

        This could have been a time when John Kennedy and Diana were unattached. There is no hint of any proper relationship. They agreed it was not possible. For the life of me I cannot see what was so terrible, if unattached, they did sleep with each other.

    • Tessa says:

      Simone Simmons claimed this. She is Another person who made money writing a book about Diana after she died. Diana was in love with Dr khan. Simmons collaborated with Ingrid Seward who does not like Diana. I don’t believe this story is true.

    • suugrpop says:

      Diana’s role model was Jackie and she did hang out with Caroline and John Jr in the 80s. She even wrote them a letter after Jackie died. I doubt that story is true though.

  64. Well Wsher says:

    An unoriginal exercise in flattery, based on ? Praise for its own sake…..
    Very fitting for the Wales’s….

  65. Nerd says:

    These are the most superficial people I have ever known about in my entire life. The whole lot of them are so fixated on how things appear instead of how they really are. Meghan pointed it out in their documentary and it seems more and more apparent that they are never really concerned about doing anything because it’s the right thing to do or because they care. They are only willing to do the bare minimum just to get that ever important photo to make it look as if they care. They don’t even measure up as far as looks or fashion but are so consumed with themselves that they don’t even realize how far out of the league they are with everyone they try and compete with or be compared to. Their extreme obsession with themselves is one thing but the fact that they always ignore important issues just to focus on this competition that they have never won and never will win is upsetting on behalf of the people in the UK who will miss being helped because these two are supposed to be the best the royals have to send out.

    • Iolanthe says:

      Fancy dress and pretend. Camilla is a lot but even she knows how to keep up a public image more or less. I too thought of King Arthur’s Camelot but even Jackie Kennedy talks of” a brief shining moment ” . Neither of the Camelots lasted very long , as these illiterates don’t realize. And the Waleses are pathetic puppet imitations

  66. LilyCat says:

    Camelot?! Lol
    More like Avenue Q

  67. jazzbaby1 says:

    Kitty Bouvier Middleton. Wait, isn’t one of Billy’s names Arthur?

  68. Cottage Cat says:

    I’m an English woman (is it OK to say that?), a year younger than Diana. I am tall, public-school background but sadly not intelligent enough to get into Grammar school (failed my 11-plus on the maths) and, back then, she was my role-model that made it OK to wear flat pumps and drop-waist dresses. I was working for BBC radio at the time, 1979, as a production assistant at Broadcasting House, living in a remote country village, looking after my horse and commuting into the West End of London each day. We all watched the wedding Even back then, I thought there was something “barbaric” about what was going on