Oppenheimer, the second-highest grossing R-rated film, might hit a billion


I saw Oppenheimer three times this summer, twice in IMAX. I’m not a Christopher Nolan stan–in fact I don’t think I’ve seen any of his other films. I just liked the movie that much. Because it came out the same weekend as Barbie, initial projections for the movie were in the modest-but-good range. Both Barbie and Oppenheimer ended up blowing way past their expected box office results, thanks in part to the delightfully weird Barbenheimer internet phenomenon. Now Oppenheimer has earned $926 million over ten weeks of release. That’s quite a feat for a three hour movie that is mostly physicists talking to each other about nuclear fission. It’s now the third-highest grossing movie of the year. I don’t think anyone expected that.

Does Christopher Nolan‘s “Oppenheimer” have enough heat to hit $1 billion globally? At one point, this milestone may have sounded entirely improbable for a three-hour historical drama that mostly depicts scientists talking about theoretical physics.

But sure enough, the biopic starring Cillian Murphy as the so-called father of the atomic bomb has become a full-fledged blockbuster with a fighting chance at joining the billion-dollar club. After 10 weeks of release, “Oppenheimer” has earned a staggering $926 million at the worldwide box office. It’s the third-highest grossing movie of the year, far surpassing big-budget tentpoles like Marvel’s “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3” ($845 million), the 10th “Fast and Furious” movie ($704 million) and “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One” ($576 million).

To reach $1 billion, “Oppenheimer” needs to generate another $74 million worldwide. Though not impossible (it has repeatedly put theatrical expectations to shame, so why stop now?), this would require people to keep showing up for “Oppenheimer” over several more weeks. Global ticket sales have been declining by roughly 20% in recent weeks, better than most films at similar points in their theatrical cycles. The challenge is that “Oppenheimer” has mostly run out of steam in North America — as expected, after two enthusiastic months on the big screen — so international audiences will be key in carrying the movie to ultimate box office glory. Overseas, it’s still reliably selling tickets in China, Italy and Germany.

For box office experts, “Oppenheimer” is a film without many useful comparisons. It’s the second-highest grossing R-rated film in history, behind 2019’s “Joker” ($1.07 billion), and has played less like a grim historical biopic and more like an all-audience superhero epic. That’s thanks to Nolan’s status as a name brand, as well as his power to encourage fans to seek out the film in Imax, where it has earned $181 million.

[From Variety]

I think this movie has done so well for all the reasons Variety lists: Christopher Nolan’s name, superhero fatigue, and the higher ticket price of IMAX. But the movie is just very good–the script has a momentum that never flags, Cillian Murphy is amazing, the cast is stacked, the cinematography is beautiful. I think word of mouth has counted for a lot of its success. I don’t know if it will break a billion dollars, but even if it hasn’t, Oppenheimer is a resounding success.

I bet the execs at Warner Brothers regret alienating Nolan now. Back during the dark days of 2020 Nolan was mad that WB was just dumping content onto streaming services instead of holding out for cinematic releases when theaters couldn’t reopen safely. Some of what Nolan said was out of touch, but some of it was legitimate. When Warner Bros put everything on streaming, creatives like actors and writers lost out on back-end revenue and residuals, and WB apparently didn’t notify them of these decisions. WB could have been profiting from both Barbie and Oppenheimer this summer! Instead Nolan is now at Universal. I understand why the studios decided not to hold out for theatrical releases during the pandemic and I think it was overall the right choice. But it also reminds me of the tensions between management and creative personnel that boiled over this summer with the strikes.

PS: I highly recommend the biography the movie is based on, American Prometheus, which is an incredible work of nonfiction that took the authors 25 years to research and write.

Photos credit: Avalon.red, Cover Images and via Instagram

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Oppenheimer, the second-highest grossing R-rated film, might hit a billion”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Hannah says:

    While I wouldn’t have normally watched this, my girlfriend and I absolutely got sucked into the whole Barbenheimer schtick and loved it. We did the double feature thing. I dressed as Oppenheimer, A dressed as Barbie. It was such good fun. Loved both films

    A bit shocked to read Mission Impossible only bought in $576 million! Yikes

  2. C says:

    I don’t personally see why Warner Brothers would regret alienating Nolan now. He was in a stronger position in that regard before Barbie came out honestly because no other film had unseated his records, but now, here we are (on what he considered his July release weekend too). Warner Brothers was petty but it paid off for them. Both together for Warner Brothers might have been great but if that had happened it’s very doubtful the Barbenheimer phenomenon would have happened to boost both films which was a major factor of both their box offices, imo, since they likely wouldn’t have been released simultaneously.

  3. Becks1 says:

    Oppenheimer was a fantastic film, I’m glad to see its continued success. I know I keep saying this on here, but the success of both Oppenheimer and Barbie should send a huge message to Hollywood execs – people want well done original movies. They’ll take original, well done dramas about meaty subjects; they’ll take glossy and bright movies about Barbie fighting the patriarchy. But they want original, good movies. There is a place for superhero movies and there is a place for the millionth Mission Impossible. but there is also a big place for these kinds of original movies and I hope the studios are getting that message.

  4. Kirsten says:

    Oppenheimer was just fantastic. I love Christopher Nolan, and I’m glad to see that this has done so well.

    When we went to a showing, there was a whole family wearing Barbenheimer t-shirts — I think so many people were really excited to be able to go to the theatre in a way that seemed like an event again.

  5. Carrie says:

    Loved Oppenheimer.
    Barbie was meh.

    • Sunnee says:

      Agree. Barbie was disappointing. But I get it, that’s just my little groups’ opinion. I went with three fun coworkers, in our 30’s, 40’s snd 50’s, dressed in Barbie wear. I was tropical/hippy/Malibu Barbie. I yawned through the musical numbers, and was annoyed with the ending. (A truly bright spot was Rhea). Anyway, we were all pretty bored after the schtick wore off. I voiced my opinion to my 22 year old daughter, who vehemently objected.
      Oppenheimer was riveting cinema.

  6. Chrissy says:

    A little off topic. It’s strange to me how unbelievably hot I find Thomas Shelby to be and how not hot, I I find every other character Cillian Murphy plays. Is that just me? Regardless, he is such a great actor, I haven’t seen Oppenheimer yet but I am really looking forward to it!

    • Becks1 says:

      Haha this is funny to me bc I find Cillian Murphy really attractive but when I tried to watch Peaky Blinders he struck me as so unattractive. I only got about 5 episodes in though, so maybe if I had kept going I would have gotten it. But in almost any other role or as just himself, I think he’s really attractive.

  7. Jillybean says:

    Dumbest stat ever. 30 years ago when a time ket to a movie was 2.50$ of course film grosses tapped out. Now a ticket is like what? 25$ a tick? Bullshit on a billion someone needs to do cost adjust

    • Becks1 says:

      Well that’s true for all box revenues though, not just this movie. I agree that I think when things like box office revenues are discussed, it should all be adjusted for inflation. There’s also just the issue of more movie screens. A smaller town that 50 years ago might have only had one or two screens now has 10 maybe. so that adds up too. But it gets cumbersome to have to account for all those factors as society changes.

    • lucy2 says:

      I think box office mojo maybe? adjusts for inflation for some of their rankings.
      Still a big profit, I think the budget was less than $200 million, plus marketing.

      I thought it was a good film, and worth seeing on the big screen, but I generally like Nolan’s work anyway.

    • C says:

      There are plenty of inflation adjustment tables for movie grosses. If we are adjusting for inflation, The Exorcist is WB’s highest grossing film ever and also the highest grossing rated R film.

  8. Lisa says:

    of all the books and tv shows and movies about straight white men that I have already seen, I just dont have a desire to see more.

  9. midnightatthemuseum says:

    I think you’re missing the ‘word of mouth’ influence here. I saw Oppenheimer twice with different friends, loved it, told all my other friends and now they’ve all been to see it. That’s never happened before. There is such a buzz about it. Last time I went the film had been out 6 weeks, it was a Monday at 3pm and there were still 24 people in the cinema. It appeals equally to men and women, has a quality cast and is directed by Chris Nolan at the top of his game.

  10. Danbury says:

    What pisses me off about Oppenheimer is the fact that, from what I understand (I haven’t seen the movie so please correct me if I’m wrong), there is little to no mention of the number of people dispossessed of their homes and later infected because of his work. They talk about how he did the testing on empty land – but it was not empty. People lived there, had their homes there. As they were Mexicans, they didn’t count as people – and even when working on testing sites, they didn’t get PPE, only the white people did. Let’s not white wash that.