Review of ‘Endgame: Inside the Royal Family & the Monarchy’s Fight for Survival’

A few weeks ago, when People Magazine published the first excerpts from Omid Scobie’s Endgame, there were grumbles from both the Sussex Squad and the royalists. I wrote about it here, expressing my hope that Endgame would be a larger, coherent narrative about “the palace leaks and briefings, the poor management and decision-making within the establishment, the clownshow of it all, the fact that the ashy royals are struggling and unpopular, all of which has been thrown into sharp relief within the past four years of the Sussexit.” Having read/skimmed Endgame, I can safely say that the book is exactly what I expected and more.

What I’ve learned from covering royal gossip for years is that those of us following the daily gossip should never underestimate the fact that the overwhelming majority of casual royal-watchers are only really paying attention to the bigger headlines. It was the same with Finding Freedom – many of us die-hard Sussex people knew those stories, but the book was so successful because casual watchers began to pay attention, or they simply appreciated that at least one book was positive/neutral about the Sussexes. Same with the Duke and Duchess of Sussexes’ Netflix docuseries – while there was new information, the bulk of it was already known, but it was just repackaged in their own words. That too was a massive success, as was Harry’s memoir. What I’m saying is that Endgame will become one of those big headlines, it will be one of those bigger stories which casual fans/supporters will pick up and absorb. And that’s a good thing, because even I was surprised by some of the details and stories Scobie wrote about.

Some areas of royal coverage we’ll get into in the next few days and weeks – Scobie writes, in detail, about the alleged affair between Rose Hanbury and Prince William, but he does so through the prism of the media and Kensington Palace’s extremely ham-fisted attempts at damage control, which leads into a larger story about William’s then-press secretary Christian Jones and Dan Wootton. Scobie also has a wealth of details about William’s 2019 Flybe stunt, William’s coldness and rage, the antagonism between Charles and William’s royal courts and Charles’s refusal to simply sit down with Harry and have a real conversation.

As much sh-t as Scobie gets for being “the Sussexes’ cheerleader” or “the Sussexes’ de facto spokesperson,” Scobie knew he had to build his own story within Endgame, and he explains, in detail, how few times he’s actually met or spoken to Meghan, his conversations with some of the Sussexes’ staff, and what happened when Finding Freedom’s sourcing was brought into question during Meghan’s lawsuit against the Mail. He also explains, throughout the book, his legwork as a reporter. So much so that I found myself asking why the hell no one else in the royal rota even thought to do the same kind of source-maintenance or basic journalism. The other royal reporters seem equally stuck in a broken system, stenographers to an ever-weakened royal court. It’s shocking to me that none of them have figured out what Scobie sussed out years ago: there’s an untapped market for honest coverage of the monarchy’s death rattle.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

82 Responses to “Review of ‘Endgame: Inside the Royal Family & the Monarchy’s Fight for Survival’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. 809Matriarch says:

    Yay! I’m the first person to comment! Listening to my copy on Audible!

  2. MrsFonzieFace says:

    Omid writes openly about the Rose Hanbury affair? Wow, that’s huge!

    • Sunshineinfiji says:

      @mrsfonzieface funny how that one part of the book wasn’t picked on in any of the tabloid reporting ei hmmm

    • EasternViolet says:

      RIGHT? I think William’s people will use this to his advantage — to further distance himself from Kate

  3. Becks1 says:

    My copy isn’t due to arrive until tomorrow and yet again I’m annoyed at myself for going with Amazon’s preorder and not just running down to my local bookstore. Amazon’s prorders used to mean I got the book sometimes the day before it officially released bc of their shipping, and now I dont get it until a day or two after. It’s why I ended up buying multiple copies of Spare.

    Great review though Kaiser and yes, I think you hit the nail on the head with the part about how much of this unknown to the casual royal watcher. People kept insisting that all the tea was “cold” – but Omid isn’t writing a book for the regular readers on this blog. He’s writing for a bigger audience than that so there is going to be a lot that we already know. I am looking forward to seeing all this laid out though in one place.

    • equality says:

      Even if tea is cold sometimes it’s useful to have it laid out logically on a timeline by someone attempting to do so honestly.

      • Becks1 says:

        Exactly!! having it all laid out logically is going to be problematic for the Windsors and I love that for them.

        I may need to get it on audible and start before my hardcopy comes. Or kindle.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        Yes! The Windsors and the rota love obfuscation when it comes to timelines and whose friend said what. Connecting the dots is crucial.

      • Lorelei says:

        @Becks, Omid narrates the audio version himself and I recommend it!

  4. Aries48 says:

    I’ll start listening later today.

    Oh and Kaiser, watch out! Those derangers and royal rats have you in their sightlines. I’ve read two articles recently that mention you.

  5. OnThisDay says:

    I think some rota members haven’t done what Omid has because they aren’t journalists. They iterally don’t have the skills and aren’t smart enough. Though they understand how to manipulate parts of the public well enough
    For others-and maybe most of the former as well- it’s because they are invested in this institution as a legitimate institution. They enjoy and want the perks of the Christmas luncheon, and thank you messages from Camilla. Even if they secretly hate the monarchy, they are still covetous of the clout.
    Omid is an outsider. He’s not white in the UK (technically he’s considered white here in the US classification scheme). He’s also not a person of color who thinks he can kiss enough butt to be admitted to the club.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      I also think we shouldn’t underestimate the political leanings of the rota. Most of them are probably Tory to the core which is part of why they are drawn to the royals in the first place. Big time monarchists. It’s in their DNA.

    • lanne says:

      It’s amazing how much importance these royal ratchets place on being on the periphery of royal life. Any of them could have written a Finding Freedom or an Endgame book, but instead, they content themselves with being unofficial gatekeepers of the royal mythology. They care more about getting a royal to nod in their direction that they do their own livelihoods. They sacrifice their own financial future for a couple of stale cookies. They “know their place,” and it was outrageous to them that an outsider (Meghan) could enter their realm and not be willing to bow and scape for the “privilege” of being in such august company (Kate). Meghan and Harry leaving makes them look stupid for worshipping at so paltry an altar.

      It reminds me of the line in the Godfather when Tom Hagen goes to see the big shot movie producer in Hollywood on behalf of the Don’s nephew: “He (nephew) made me look ridiculous! And nobody makes me look ridiculous!”

      To extend the metaphor, perhaps Endgame is the horse head in the bed. We can hear the ratchets screaming “AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH” at all the attention/money that Scobie will get.

      While they get stale cookies from a passel of stale crackers. Yum yum.

    • Proud Mary says:

      I agree. And also, I think the Rotas are either naive or being very disingenuous when they attribute Scobie’s sourcing to the Sussexes. I believe that not all royal staff are on board with Charles and William’s leadership, especially since the Queen’s final years. I think, whether or not they support the Sussexes, a significant number of palace staff respected Harry & Meghan for their work ethic and dynamicism. I think those staff were fully aware that jealousy over the Sussexes popularity was often at the root of the animus. I don’t think those people would share their feelings with toadies like Maureen, Palmolive, Refrigerator English, or Camilatomineyisaliar. So yes, Kaiser is right that the ground is fertile for real journalism about the royals. I think more than anything, Scobie’s reporting is relevant for embarrassing the palace fake journalists. I think the palace’s primary job now will be to make sure Scobie is the lone serious journalist covering the firm, assuming they can’t get rid of him. Watch your back Omid!

    • Jay says:

      I think it’s telling how very few of them would be fit for any other reporting gig – what the rota do is not journalism, it’s basically printing exactly what their palace sources say without introspection or collaboration.

      The priority is first and foremost to keep a good relationship with the royals and their courtiers, not to report. Omid started out in the gossip biz, but it’s clear to me that he’s one of the few reading the room here.

      How many of the royal rota have published their own books about various members of royal family and how many were actually successful? Tina Brown had some success, but it was quickly overshadowed by Harry’s Spare – and how could any of them try to hold a candle to Harry’s own story, his own words, and read in his voice? I think people are fed up with reading glorified press releases and all of that ‘it is understood” and “sources close to the palace” nonsense.

      I haven’t got my hands on a copy yet, but it sounds like Scobie’s book covers more about the logistics and mismanagement at the palace. For those who read “Spare” and wondered: “How is it possible that these people are so bad at this???”

      • Christine says:

        A while back, there were a bunch of us here who were basically trying to manifest Rowan Farrow turning his investigative talents towards that family. I didn’t believe that Omid Scobie would have the spine to write a book that wasn’t at its core sycophantic. I was apparently very wrong, and I am so fucking happy for Omid Scobie.

        This has always been a field ripe for a real journalist to tear it down to its roots, and I’m so glad it’s Omid. I’m sorry I ever doubted you.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    I’m now convinced that People Magazine chose to excerpt cold tea so that they didn’t offend the Royal Family because it’s puzzling that they didn’t lead with new stories about Charles, William and Kate.

    • ML says:

      Tbf, they may have been told what they were allowed to excerpt? If I were Omid Scobie, I would want the new stuff to come out at the same times me as my book, and I would want the RR to have as little information as possible ahead of its release.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    Those worrying that this is all just rehashed material should remind themselves that the British media’s royal sycophants aren’t losing their everloving 💩 over stuff already known to the larger British public. From this distance, they seem to be in full panic mode. And that is why they are also desperately insisting that Scobie is the Sussex stenographer. They do not want the British public to know that they (the royal correspondents) are the palace stenographers.

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I love it for them! I’m buying the book on kindle, because Kaiser’s review reassured me that it’s worth it for us CBers too. And because I want to support Omid and his work.

      • Brassy Rebel says:

        I’ve been on the fence about the book, but these revelations are nudging me to buy it.

      • Glamarazzi says:

        I’m buying it on kindle too – it’s important to support independent journalism. Excited to read it!

  8. L84Tea says:

    I wasn’t planning to get this book, but hmmm.,..I might have to get it on Audible and listen today. The fact that he touches on the Rose affair is pretty exciting.

  9. Tessa says:

    I am thrilled he is reporting on the fly be stunt.

  10. Harper says:

    Just opened page one on my kindle. I am so excited. Good to know the Flybe stunt and Rose are included.

  11. Jais says:

    It’s interesting how the BM almost seems angrier about this book than spare. Or maybe time has passed and my brain can’t recall. They’re so mad he gave out copies but not to them. Love that for them. Saw a clip online of yesterday’s this morning where Tominey is questioning his sources, suggesting he doesn’t have any beyond just Harry and Meghan. Really wished I could raise my hand and question her through the tv. As in, whoa, yeah, no, Tominey, you of the fake crying story have no room to talk about questionable sources. Shameless.

  12. Agnes says:

    ” There’s an untapped market for honest coverage of the monarchy’s death rattle. ” Lolz!

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I hope it’s true, especially in Brittain. There must be people, other than Kate’s Brexit Pensioner fanbase, who are bored with the current stale, repetitive bullshit about the BRF.

    • Lorelei says:

      It’s so true! The British tabloids could basically print money if they’d just pivot and go for it.

  13. Haylie says:

    Sorry, but Omid buddied up with Jason Knauf who strong-armed Meghan into speaking with Omid, Omid printed lies about Meghan in Finding Freedom while going soft on The Keens, and then that meeting was used against her in court. Omid was actively a part of the machine out to destroy Meghan for profit. So, no, I’m not cutting him any slack or buying a book based on info from sources that can’t be trusted. What reputable journalist uses sources known to lie?

    • Taytanish says:

      Buying or not buying Endgame is a personal choice. But refusing to buy Omids book based on who spoke to Jason Knauff or who didn’t is very strange to me. Omid AND Meghan (IMVHO) were both Jason Knauff’s victims, but I’ll leave it at that and let others enjoy the book.
      I’ll support Omid, just because Endgame is making all those fckuin’ 🐀 🐀 and minions panic. I love that William and Charles and their courts are all going nuts about Endgame. That gives me some sort of satisfaction. Well done Omid👏🏾 👏🏾

    • equality says:

      Did he buddy up with him or did he contact him as KP’s spokesperson at the time like any media would?

      • windyriver says:

        JK had a valid position as KP’s comms guy (before he became head of the foundation) and at that point even Meghan didn’t know what a rat he was. That’s why there were e-mail messages between them over her letter to her father. It was his role to advise her, and she trusted him to do so. Likewise, Omid would have approached him as the official contact with the Sussexes, and if Meghan herself wasn’t yet aware of what JK was, why would Omid have been expected to know?

        And, Omid was one of just a couple of people invited to attend one of Meghan’s last official events as a working royal. So apparently she didn’t blame him for what had gone on re: Knauf, FF, etc..

      • Haylie says:

        Did Omid print things that were not true? Yes, he did.

        If he is a journalist, why did he not verify?

        Because he’s Rota, and therefore, prone to printing lies to pacify the firm.

      • Lorelei says:

        @Windyriver, thank you for explaining all of this. This is my take on the situation as well. Even H&M seemed to still trust Knauf back then.

      • Becks1 says:

        Omid is not part of the rota.

      • Jaded says:

        @Haylie – Omid isn’t a rota rat, nor does he print lies to mollify the Firm. Your conflating him with the other sewer rats who DO print lies because they have no legitimate sources, especially as regards the Sussexes and their comms people who are leak-proof.

      • windyriver says:

        @Haylie – Know how people here comment they’re not going to believe x, y, z in the tabloids until it’s confirmed by a Sussex spokesperson? At the time we’re discussing, that Sussex spokesperson was – Jason Knauf. He worked directly with H&M (and W&K) at KP. If Omid wanted to verify something or get information, the person he was supposed to check with was their official press liaison – Jason. And Jason was deliberately providing misinformation. The lies were coming from inside the house. Even H&M didn’t fully realize it. Omid isn’t part of the rota; and since the current Sussex spokespeople will respond to his information requests, they apparently don’t have a problem with him.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      I get what you’re saying @Haylie. I have/had my own doubts about Omid. Finding Freedom only showed me that Omid & the Sussexes were not speaking directly to each other and that the information Meghan was asked/told to give to Knauf for the book-which the Sussexes really did not want to be part of, but were more like, if this is going to happen then please clear up these BM mistruths.

      Knauf was the driving force. He was given information and then chose to hold back on the corrective information. We don’t have emails/transcripts of conversations between Omid & Carolyn Durand & Jason Knauf. Carolyn Durand, a name that seems to have been disappeared from FF by RR’s. WTF? She’s been reporting on the royals before the Sussexes. fyi, Carolyn Durand wrote an article on July 25, 2019 (after the uncomfortable pics at that polo game), saying how Kate & Meghan were texting each other on the regular and Kate was really supportive to Meghan during her pregnancy.LOFL

      Don’t believe Omid offered himself up as a witness for the Fail. The BM wouldn’t report it accurately. We did learn (though most Sussex supporters guessed it) that Melissa Toubatti, didn’t quit, she was f&cking fired. Jason Knauf’s friend was fired. Jason Knauf’s friend that was hired to help Meghan out with the wedding. A hire that had no frickin experience. HMMM.

  14. Mrs. Smith says:

    All of my Amazon orders have been days late, so I’ll use my current Audible credit for this one! It sounds like Omid has laid out all the stupid shenanigans so even the most casual of followers can put two and two together. Part of the strength of the rota is the incessant hammering of lies and clickbait to entice readers, but if you aren’t keeping up with it everyday, it is impossible to follow. Good for Omid!!! I hope he laughs all the way to the bank simply pointing out the obvious about the BRF. Ha!

  15. HO says:

    I stayed up late to read it last night and I’ll say it was a quite balanced narrative. Critical of both sides but mostly highlighting missteps and gaffes and how they will play a part in the long term narrative of the firm. Chapter 13 was the best I’d say. It was really great to see in detail how far Prince William’s office went to squash the affair rumours. It was well sourced, to my surprise.

    Congrats to the British press. I never planned to read it but they made me with their endless coverage and bullying. I cannot stand bullies.

    Also, the reaction from Brits has been quite telling. A rotten country that deserves everything happening to it. No matter how much they blame the tabloids, the British public have a large fault to bear in all of this.

    • HO says:

      I should also add that I came away with a feeling of sadness. For Meghan mostly

    • kirk says:

      HO – Thanks for your review. I’d read elsewhere that Ch13 actually lays out media names, sounds somewhat like Amol Rajan’s BBC broad/pod cast, Harry, Meghan and the Media. Whenever I see someone defending britpublic (not me, not all of us!), I’m reminded that the majority of the britpublic are totally copacetic with their godawful media, including the vaunted The Times that’s supposedly good journalism 🙄. Having read some of the careless coverage on this topic by The Times yesterday, I can say they’re not skilled at their intentional sleight-of-hand.

      • HO says:

        Whoever wrote that was right. I’d say he went even further than Amol Rajan’s BBC piece. It really lays it all out in exquisite detail. I was quite surprised and impressed, and I approached the book as a skeptic. William is awful and should be terribly ashamed. And yes, if the Brits wanted their media to be different, it would be. They’re all complicit.

  16. SueBarbri33 says:

    I’m glad to hear all of this. The speculation and events have been rehashed to death by this point, but there’s still a lot to say about the scaffolding behind the royal soap opera. The RF’s relationship with the press will be the real story when all this is said and done.

  17. GrnieWnie says:

    I checked out his Wikipedia page and my God, someone got there fast to add a BBC review of Endgame saying “this book is stale” lol. Trying hard!

  18. @BelizeEmpower says:

    Kaiser, methinks this quote (article in Daily Fail) quietly reveals who the royal racist might be, “Mr Scobie also says that within these letters, King Charles encouraged Meghan to discuss her feelings with the Princess of Wales.” Why her and not William??? Charles is suggesting Meghan address and clear the air with the culprit, Catherine, no? Hmmm…she is dumb enough to say it out loud; she despised Meghan so much that she decided to attack her unborn child. Insecure, haughty, bold and cold bisch.
    That was a very clever way for Scobie to reveal the racist. Scobie also says “a palace source told him the Waleses pushed for a ‘recollections may vary’ clause to be added to Buckingham Palace’s public response to the interview, with Kate said to be ‘really passionate about defending the family’.” Kate was passionate about defending Kate. You will recall Valentine Low, “Kate and Prince William wanted it “toughened up.” The Low article went on to say, “It was Kate who clearly made the point, ‘History will judge this statement and unless this phrase or a phrase like it is included, everything that they have said will be taken as true,'” another source shared.

    Kate knew she said a lot of sh*t!

  19. carrotface says:

    I was going to wait and get it from the library but I decided to actually order it based on Kaiser’s tweets. Even if I already know a lot of the info, I feel like there’s a lot I’ve probably forgotten and honestly I want to support the few people who are giving public media pushback to the BRF’s unending piles of hagiographic crap.

  20. Over it says:

    Kaiser, I think Omid should cut you a check because you have convinced me to buy and read this book. Now I know what I will be doing this holiday season. Thank you.

  21. SJP-NYC says:

    Keep an eye on the amazon reviews. I just checked and their were 5 reviews – 3 of which were not verified purchases and 1 star shouting about “lies”. This is going to be interesting to watch how it develops. There were 2 5 star verified purchases.

    • Berkeleyfarm says:

      I am reporting those!

    • Susan says:

      Same with Indigo if you are looking at Canadian booksellers. Just checked it and one really nasty review was from a month ago shouting out it being fiction and lies. Hardly qualifies as a review. I wish the booksellers would clamp down on this nonsense.

  22. VilleRose says:

    I’m on the fence about buying this book, I didn’t buy or read Finding Freedom. This website did enough reviews and excerpts that I didn’t feel the need to buy it. I might buy the digital version through Ibooks and just read it on my phone. Unlike Spare which I did buy and read, this isn’t the kind of book I’d want on my bookshelf for years to come. It’s a one and done kind of thing. I’ll read the rest of the articles here before making up my mind.

    • Jenn says:

      I’ve read neither Finding Freedom nor Spare — I think the last fluffy thing I read was ONE (!) of Rob Lowe’s autobiographies, loool — and these days I only buy physical books if they’re heirlooms or reference books. I bought Endgame on Kobo and opened it on my laptop, to read in between errands. Why not?

  23. Jessica says:

    I’ve been waffling on buying the book but this article pushed me to buy! I got a kindle edition, and I saw it’s a #1 best seller but a rating of 2 stars… interesting to see how that will change after people get a chance to read!

    • Berkeleyfarm says:

      The one star reviews are “review bombing” from people who have not purchased or read the book.

      • AC says:

        I wouldn’t be surprised if these poor reviews are from trolls and haven’t read the book. They’ve done it before.

  24. MabsAMabbin says:

    “…There’s an untapped market for honest coverage of the monarchy’s death rattle.”

    Exquisite.

  25. Mary Pester says:

    😂🤣😂🤣😂The derangers in the UK are losing their sht and they haven’t even read the book!! How bloody typical, protect the cult at all costs!! We must save princess lady garden From the invading Rose bush 😂😂😂.
    The king is horrified, the Queen’s just fking HORRIBLE Sophie is saying how she is the kings favourite and Andrew is pissng himself laughing because Omid didn’t know about his latest financial farce. Billy is saying its ALL Kates fault. She hates Megan because Harry was her fail safe for when I divorce her. Her mother is also a press leaker, but me? I’m the heir and I love my brother (as long as he either does as I say or stays in America so I can rule,(after I have got rid of dad) I mean after my dear papa’s passing!!

  26. Cat says:

    On Chapter 3. Noted that Charles, at least, knows not to show up at a food bank empty handed.
    As far as the 2 pen incidents, they remind me a little of how I punched a wall on the day of my mom’s funeral bc I bought a suit for my youngest only to discover that the store forgot to take the anti-theft device off.
    So on one hand I kind of get it, on the other….he’s been trained for this all hs life and he *knew* there were cameras in his face. 🤷‍♀️

  27. Berkeleyfarm says:

    I am reporting amazon reviews that are obviously from people who have only read the biased coverage in the Fail, Torygraph, etc. and urge others to do the same.

  28. Lilly (with the double-L) says:

    @Kaiser – thanks for the review. I debated and finally ordered the book. It should arrive today. Thanks also to others for your take. I hope it arrives soon.

  29. SMS says:

    Very odd that the Dutch versions named the Royal racists and it now the Dutch version is being withdrawn. Also interesting to see it wasn’t William or Kate. I bet neither Harry nor Meghan will appreciate this and doubt they will maintain a relationship with Scobie.

    • Beverley says:

      Omid Scobie has said repeatedly that he isn’t a personal friend of the Sussexes, so there’s no friendship to maintain.

    • ArtFossil says:

      Omid Scobie has nothing to do with a bad Dutch translation and the Sussexes don’t care.

  30. J.Ferber says:

    I just read that in Holland the book was pulled “temporarily” because it reveals who the royal racist is. Any Dutch Celebitches who already got a copy? PLEASE tell us!!!

    • DARK says:

      Based on a screenshot from twitter it said Charles

    • LadyE says:

      Scobie is on record today saying that no version written by him (in English) names the person. Whatever is going on with the Dutch translation, it is not a reveal from Scobie, the author, and I would really encourage everyone not to believe that whoever is named is the correct person. This is super messed up and I wouldn’t put it past some in the media to do this just to create controversy and use this fake “reveal” to attack (and blame) Harry and particularly Meghan.

      • LadyE says:

        Too late to edit comment, but adding to it: And…blaming Meghan and claiming that Scobie put this in the Dutch version on her say so is exactly what is going on in all the comments. Just read through 4 different articles and it is a Meghan hatefest, all framing this Dutch error as being done on purpose and coming from her to Scobie. This is incredibly dirty and I really fear it’s going to set off a whole other level of hate and conspiracy theories about Meghan. Honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me if Charles (yes he’s named) blamed them for this and used it to strip them of their titles. I really think H&M are being set up here

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Shared it on a different post. Will share again. Meghan is over it. She or Omid did not name Charles.
        https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a43685011/meghan-markle-reaction-king-charles-leaked-letter-archie-skin-color/

  31. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Emilia & Sms, I doubt you have read the book. I think before you talk about it you should at least read enough of it to discover his sources and how many he had before writing about an incident. That’s what journalists do–they get more than one source to confirm what they’ve been told. People who make up stories either for the sake of writing something or because they’ve been given the order to give the article a specific twist (but still lies) are tabloid reporters. And I use the word reporters loosely.

  32. Kkat says:

    So the dutch version naming Charles… I could see the actual royal racists arranging this to happen.
    They would divert suspicion and they would get M attacked