Kim Kardashian & Kylie Jenner vamped it up for the PFW Margiela show

Paris Fashion Week is still in full swing, and Kim Kardashian’s in town now. Kylie and Kris Jenner have been in Paris for days, and they already attended the Valentino show and Jean Paul Gaultier show (where Kylie “looked old”). On Thursday, Kris, Kim and Kylie headed out to the Maison Margiela show and they all got fresh looks from the fashion house.

Kim obviously got “the best” look, I guess. It’s sort of glam/goth and her styling is good here. I prefer Kim with black hair and sort of “Cher” styling (she loves Cher). The necklace is OTT but it’s fine, it’s supposed to look straight from the runway. Kylie got a silver sequined dress which isn’t bad, although I wouldn’t have gone tea length with it. Kylie’s shoes are horrendous, they look like something Minnie Mouse would wear. Kris looks like her daughters’ bodyguard. They’re so funny.

Kylie seems to be doing a copypasta of Kim’s whole aesthetic from several years ago, right? The wet-hair, the heavy makeup, the living doll look.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Kim Kardashian & Kylie Jenner vamped it up for the PFW Margiela show”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Minority Report says:

    Does Kim have a wonky eye or am I imagining it?

  2. Ameerah M says:

    I like both of their dresses. I don’ hate Kylie’s shoes but I don’t like it with the dress. They take away from the rest of the look. That Margiela show was WILD! Lots of completely sheer dresses with boobies and houhas out. The overall aesthetic was cool (think Paris nightclubs in the 1920s and 1930s mixed with a healthy dose of Moulin Rouge) but we will be seeing LOTS of iterations of those sheer looks.

    • Ronaldinhio says:

      Something about the dress and shoes doesn’t work.
      I can’t tell if the photographs are manipulated or if the dress is offering illusions but it looks like she has Barbie feet here

      • Isa says:

        Kylie’s shoes look like they should go with a miniskirt. It seems like you need to show a lot of leg to balance them out.

  3. LooneyTunes says:

    Yikes! Kris’ face!

  4. Katie says:

    Kris is going full Karl Lagerfeld. Wouldn’t have been hilarious if one of the girls just had like a completely different aesthetic and refused to play ball? Like if one of them had been full Zooey Deschanel twee or something?

  5. crogirl says:

    They look the same ahe and have the same plastic faces.
    It’s such a shame, I remember when I first saw a photo of Kim in the early 2000 and thinking how genuinely beautiful she was. There’s nothing left of that woman today

  6. Barrett says:

    I feel like you can see Kris’s age in her neck and as an originally very attractive woman she would look better/sophisticated w less work and more movement and more of her original face. As for the lips, don’t get me started. The seem even worse than Kylie’s.

  7. LeaTheFrench says:

    Fashion is fashion and “wearability” is not necessarily the key decision-making factor. But for some reason I can’t get past how uncomfortable these dresses look. Kylie looks like she’s sweating in hers, Kim’s looks itchy 🫣 I’m not feeling these looks, I must say. Mostly because I can’t imagine myself enjoying wearing them.

  8. sparrow says:

    I think it was Jaded who mentioned Instaface on another post re this family. I think it was yest. I went and read up on it. Really interesting. Thanks, Jaded. The thing is, to me, they’re all trying, in part, for the look of my middle eastern family. It’s such a pick and mix of aesthetic, and it’s truly everywhere. In terms of how it plays out for people with less money – I see it when I walk past young women and they’ve piled on the contouring to get the cheekbones. It’s jarring in daylight. Ever since AI really hit, I’ve been waiting for the enhanced look to be taken to a new level of attainment and aspiration.

  9. Torttu says:

    Tacky awful messy. They always look dated, somehow, I don’t know what it is exactly.

    • Josephine says:

      I think they always look dated as well. I think it’s because they have no presence, charm, charisma. That vacant look is their thing but it really detracts from the clothing and makes everything look so flat, sad and old somehow. They seem to never enjoy fashion and have no style of their own, and everything borrowed looks naturally dated.

  10. Chaine says:

    Kim just always looks so vacant and plastic. Hard to remember how cute she was back in the day when she was just one of Paris Hilton’s hangers-on. Kylie looks really lovely except the awful cartoonish white shoes. Kris’s current aesthetic seems to be “mid-career Rosie O’Donnell” and sorry, that look wasn’t great on Rosie herself and it is not definitely working for Kris. She needs a makeover bad.

  11. HMT04 says:

    Is anyone else so PO’d and also not surprised that Kim gave it a year for the outrage and disgust around Balenciaga exploiting and abusing children via modeling them with BDSM teddy bears, and now that she let the outrage calm down, she’s the ambassador for the clothing line because she thinks she looks her best in their clothing. This is the classic Kardashian ‘fixer’ move; they stay quiet about the topic and distance themselves from the issue for about a year and then back to their on-brand self-promotion BS!! I called this the second it happened a year ago!!

  12. BB says:

    Kris looks like a melting James Marsters. I dig her look except for that melting face.

  13. sparrow says:

    HMT04. This is a reply to you but once again I’ve landed lower down! I used to love Balenciaga. Note the used to. Yes, she’s been cynical and mercenary getting into bed with them.

  14. Roast says:

    I don’t understand how Kylie looks like she’s aged 30 years overnight. I’ve always thought she was beautiful (even with her tweaks), but she been looking close to her mother’s age recently.

  15. Benevolent Dictator says:

    There is absolutely nothing fine about that necklace.