Law Roach: Chanel, Gucci, Valentino, Dior & YSL refused to work with Zendaya

Law Roach has been Zendaya’s stylist since she was a teenager. Law had as much to do with crafting Zendaya’s celebrity status as her agent and manager – it was Law transforming a child star into an It Girl and serious “fashion girl.” Zendaya’s styling has helped promote every one of her projects, and her red carpet appearances help ensure global headlines for every one of her projects too. While Law enjoyed a full roster of clients for many years, these days, he’s no longer a stylist-on-demand, and he only works with Zendaya and a few particular clients, plus he’s pursuing other ventures. Law recently spoke to The Cutting Room about styling Zendaya and how many fashion houses simply refused to work with her in the early days.

Zendaya and fashion may have become synonymous throughout the years, but according to her stylist, she hasn’t always been the go-to-girl for big brands looking to showcase their designs. In an interview with The Cutting Room Floor shared on Patreon Thursday, May 9, the actress’ long-time collaborator, Law Roach, said it was a challenge to get certain luxury fashion houses to work with the Challengers star, 27.

“I would write the big five. I would write Saint Laurent, Chanel, Gucci, Valentino, Dior, and they would all say, ‘No, try again next year. She’s too green,’” Roach, 45, said during the interview.

The episode was filmed on April 22 — two weeks before the Dune star walked the red carpet at the 2024 Met Gala, where she also served as a co-chair for the event. For the “Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion” theme, Zendaya wore a gown by Maison Margiela’s John Galliano. According to Roach, he kept “all the receipts” from the “big five” who had previously turned his client down.

“By the time she had got to American Vogue, she still had never wore any of those designers — she still hasn’t,” he said. The host seemed surprised by his confession, so Roach explained a bit further.

“In an editorial, yes. But on a red carpet, she still has never worn Dior on a carpet. She still has never worn Chanel on a carpet. She has still never worn Gucci on a carpet. Any press, any appearance, never,” Roach said.

“The first time she wore Valentino in public is when she had a contract,” he added of Zendaya. He continued, “So when I said, ‘If you say no, it’ll be a no forever,’ that rang true for a long, long time.”

[From People]

I understand that there are layers to this but one of the biggest factors is racism – they didn’t want a (beautiful) young Black actress in their designs. That was probably true of Saint Laurent, Chanel, Dior, and hell, probably Gucci and Valentino too. Although I do wonder about Gucci – they’ve been trying to trend younger and cooler for years now and it feels like Zendaya would have been a good fit for Gucci at some point. It probably wasn’t solely about Zendaya either – it was that a Black stylist was making these requests for a Black actress. It reveals that many houses are not and were not forward-thinking enough to understand that Zendaya would become who she is today, one of the most major “fashion girls” in the world. “If you say no, it’ll be a no forever.” That one sentence is a masterclass in knowing your worth and your client’s worth.

(Also, I’m genuinely glad that Zendaya didn’t get stuck in Chanel’s web or Dior’s web – those two houses grab young celebrity women and lock them into exclusive contracts and then proceed to force those women into some of the worst clothes ever.)

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

50 Responses to “Law Roach: Chanel, Gucci, Valentino, Dior & YSL refused to work with Zendaya”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. UnstrungPearl says:

    Such a smart strategy, especially avoiding those terrible contracts its a blessing in disguise. The worst imo is Louis Vuitton, but what Chanel did to Marhot Robbie was bizarre.
    Agree Gucci could be a good fit now, she would look amazing in their new direction. But only take it for a short contract – get paid!!

  2. MY3CENTS says:

    Big mistake. Huge.

  3. Normades says:

    Isn’t that what happened with Anya TJ? She got a Dior contract and Law was soon out. Her style has suffered ever since.

  4. LooneyTunes says:

    They don’t dress everyone, though. Wasn’t there a well known actress recently who had to buy her own designer gown off the rack? No major designer was going to run to dress an unknown actress on a little show. How would they know she’d turn into the phenom she is?

    • BeyondTheFringe says:

      I know Bryce Dallas Howard has said she has to buy off the rack for premiers/events but I think that has more to do with her being a relatively average size woman and not sample size.

    • Lemons says:

      Yeah, but simply refusing to dress an up and coming (pretty established Disney child star, honestly) actress who IS the sample size is just bizarre. They missed out.

      • tealily says:

        I feel like the “Disney star” label probably hurt her. She was stuck in the the “kid” mold for a while there. She’s really just getting out.

      • Flower says:

        100% especially when said Disney star looks more model-like than the nepo baby models they were dressing.

        I have to give Zendaya her flowers because my God she has dealt with so much racism – and that is as a light skinned biracial woman.

        Wasn’t it some presenter on E-Entertainment who insulted her on camera and insulted her outfit and hair?

      • Flamingo says:

        yes @Flower it was Giuliana Rancic on E! Fashion Police who said her hair looked like it smelled of “patchouli and weed”.

        She went on an apology tour right after and blamed the writers who gave her the line to say…. It also killed the show, that lost it’s rudder when Joan Rivers died. It went from snarky to just mean.

  5. sevenblue says:

    “No, try again next year. She’s too green”

    That statement itself doesn’t sound weird to me, but I am assuming since Law is in the industry, he knows that means sh*t, some kind of discrimination against Zendaya? Maybe, he knew they wouldn’t say no to an upcoming white woman. Then, it makes sense he kept the receipts and held a grudge. I remember when Zendaya was on red carpet with dreads, a horrible woman made a racist comment about her hair on a fashion program. They didn’t see a problem talking about her like that in front of the camera, I can’t imagine what they would be saying in the very exclusive fashion houses.

    • Dee(2) says:

      It was Guiliana Rancic who I guess thought she was being “edgy” by joking that a 15 year old ( who was attending the Oscars btw) probably smelled like weed because she had faux locs in. Z’s response to her on social media was a master class in how to respond to ignorance and was when I really started to pay attention to her. So I’m not shocked that her and Law said ok cool, I know where I’ll be and I won’t promote you. Even if they didn’t think that she was going to be a super famous a-list actress, by the time she was 15 she was already walking the Oscars red carpet, with the TV show on Disney, and a record contract so it still smells of racism.

    • Barbara says:

      That was Guiliana Rancic saying she looked like she smelled like “weed and patchouli.” She got justifiably raked over the coals for that one.

      • Matilda says:

        And eventually let go because of the incident. Well Giulia’s at HSN now “designing” home decor so it all worked out as it should including Zendaya not being dressed as an older woman.

    • Becks1 says:

      I think that statement itself would have been fine, not everyone is going to get Dior for the red carpet when you’re just starting out, but it sounds like some of them still aren’t dressing her? I can’t tell if that’s because Law Roach is no longer asking them or if they are still refusing though.

      • BQM says:

        It definitely seems it’s now because Law is keeping them from her not the other way around.

    • SpiritualRooster says:

      I was trying to remember who it was who said that… something about smelling like patchuli or something like that. It was racist and rude. She was so much younger then too. Just mean.

    • tealily says:

      And we haven’t really heard that much from Guiliana Rancic since then, have we.

      • Moira's Rose's Garden says:

        Nor have we heard from Guiliana Rancid either….

      • Lady Rae says:

        I remember when she said that. It was when fashion police was the most popular with Joan Rivers. I think she tried to say the joke was written for her or that it had been said in some sort of pre-taping and everyone laughed and no one said that it was offensive. She was one of the main hosts of E! I think she was quickly fired.

    • Veronica S. says:

      I can see early in her career saying she’s too green, but it sounds like it might have been a consistent thing over the years even as her adult career started to take off. European fashion houses have been pretty notorious for awhile, though, in terms of their aesthetic preferences. It’s really only in the last decade that you’ve seen more diversity on the runway.

  6. s808 says:

    I thank God everyday Chanel didn’t get their hooks into her. This worked out perfectly imo because her and Law turned to vintage and smaller designers who benefit a lot from having Zendaya in their clothes. She now has leverage to craft these contracts to her terms (her LV contract anyone? She almost never HAS to wear their clothes anywhere, has done like 1 campaign and been to 2 shows). This is a case where rejection was protection & redirection. Good on Law for standing his ground regarding the no unless they cut her a check.

  7. SAS says:

    100% racism but also Law gives such bad vibes I imagine it’s really easy for people in the industry to mask their racism by using the excuse of not wanting to deal with him and his drama.

    • Looty says:

      Law needs to channel this into changing things for the next generation, not grudge holding.

      • sevenblue says:

        @Looty, but then these companies won’t learn? They need to invest and respect the upcoming black talent too. If they don’t, they know now they are gonna miss the future opportunities. This is nothing new. Destiny’s Child was also rejected by a lot of fashion houses because they were young black women. He is changing things by holding them to their “no”s and publicly talking about it.

    • Goodbye Romeo says:

      Didn`t he have some scandals a while back? Could be a bunch of factors mentioned, her age/race/fame at the time, his past, or some random snobbery.

      Maybe it was a blessing in disguise, because their fashion teamwork together has been amazing, despite who did not provide them with outfits!

    • Jes says:

      What are Law’s bad vibes? I hadn’t seen any sign except him speaking up for himself..?

      • SpiritualRooster says:

        Yah, I’m also curious. I like how he doesn’t take any sh*t and speaks his mind. He speaks up for his clients too which is important.

      • Kokiri says:

        If there are any stories, it’s because a Black man dared speak his mind.

        He stood up for his clients & tried to get the best for them. Of course notoriously racist fashion houses said no & that he’s hard to work with.

    • Lukie says:

      What bad vibes do you feel Law Roach gives off?

      • Ben says:

        @Lukie The bad vibes are that he’s a Black gay man who knows his worth, his client worth, dared to not be happy with crumbs, spoke his mind and became a powerhouse along the way. If he was a White woman many would be yass queening him.

  8. Square2 says:

    Racism is bad, but wearing John Galliano is not?

    Zandaya is so good at wearing & posting. Some of the clothes Law has chosen for her were ugly but she she made it worked.

  9. jamie says:

    the big five are notorious for being snooty and choosy. they’re well established enough that they don’t need stars to wear looks on the red carpet to promote. it doesn’t add a whole lot of extra marketing to Chanel’s brand to have a “green” starlet wearing their looks on the red carpet. and over-exposure sometimes hurts the brand. Tom Ford is notorious for controlling who wears his looks. Tracee Ellis Ross, Tessa Thompson, Janelle Monae are all women who have worn Chanel to the red carpet. on top of that, Law wasn’t known then. It’s a sh*tty business, and they’re regretting it now.

  10. TQ says:

    ‘One of the biggest factors is racism – they didn’t want a (beautiful) young Black actress in their designs…. It probably wasn’t solely about Zendaya either – it was that a Black stylist was making these requests for a Black actress.’ 100% this, @kaiser. Seems very clear when even now they are still doing racist pieces and campaigns like Gucci’s Blackface sweater in 2019 (https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/692314950/gucci-apologizes-and-removes-sweater-following-blackface-backlash); Dior’s Asian pulled eye campaign in 2023 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-65229901). Until these fashion houses are more diverse, they’ll keep showing their racism.

    • Jais says:

      The styling world seems small and up till now pretty exclusive. It was not just about them being racist words zendaya but law as well.

  11. Kaye says:

    Their loss.

  12. Ben says:

    For reference Anya Taylor Joy who’s been in the industry a small fraction of what Zendaya have been got a Dior contract a few years in to acting.

    • Kirsten says:

      Anya Taylor-Joy comes from a VERY affluent family and already had industry connections before she ever started acting.

  13. Veronica S. says:

    I wonder if it’s also because Dior had JLaw and Chanel had Kirsten Stewart that they felt they didn’t need more “it girls,” much less one that didn’t look like their typical European branding aesthetic. A strange and foolish decision, though, since Zendaya is literally built like a model. She has the height and body to make them look like runway pieces.

  14. Kokiri says:

    To anyone saying it was probably her age, or her child star status… remember this: Lily Rose had her first Chanel contract at 16.
    With no experience, just very famous parents & very white skin.

    We all know why Zendaya was refused.

    • Flamingo says:

      Nepo Baby says what?

    • Lady Rae says:

      To be fair Lily Rose’s mother is Vanessa Paradis. Vanessa Paradis was a Chanel model, so it makes sense that they’ve given her a contract as soon as they could, as soon as she turned 16. I guess what bugs me is when you see Gwyneth Paltrow’s child being flown to sit front row, she doesn’t even work in the industry and Gwyneth was never a Chanel girl. Anyway I don’t think Zendaya is missing out on anything from not wearing these brands. Some of their collections have been terrible over the last few years. They could have trolled them though by wearing some of their vintage pieces though.

  15. Hannah says:

    I googled the Guiliana Rancid thing. DYK Zendaya was only 18 when that b*tch said that about her?!?! 🤯 FFS, she was a baby. But, Zee handled it like the fricking pro that she is, even at 18

  16. ohwell says:

    I understand his grievances, but the airing out of it makes Zendaya look bad.

    • pme says:

      How does Zendaya look bad? Pointing out how fashion houses treated her? The truth hurts!

    • Kirsten says:

      I expect he thinks it makes the fashion houses look bad but they do not care. These luxury brands are all making pushes to be even more exclusive and this news won’t bother them one bit.