Blake Lively steps out in $1595 holey boots & no pants

Eric Daman Celebrates You Know You Want It

At what point do we need to begin our pants intervention for Blake Lively? Because this girl has a problem. It’s not a crack pipe problem or a Jack on the rocks problem or even a sex addiction problem. This girl is simply allergic to pants. She has a psychosomatic allergy to completely covering her legs and ass. Although, to be fair to Blake, this might the most covered up on a red carpet that I’ve seen her. At long last, right? I mean, what a East Coast winter to develop a pants allergy. She’s been freezing her ass off for months, strutting down red carpets in 20 degree (Fahrenheit) weather wearing little more than some fashionable booty shorts or a lacy camisole.

Anyway, this is Blake at the event for Henri Bendel on Tuesday night. The Huffington Post and Us Weekly both noted that Blake was wearing the awesome, new, perforated Stella McCartney thigh-high boots – that cost $1,595 – but no pants. Or, as HuffPo put it, “seemingly no pants.” Because what good are pants if it doesn’t seem like you’re wearing them? Oh, and she brought her boobs out again. The Henri Bendel event was for the publication of You Know You Want It: Style-Inspiration-Confidence by Eric Daman, who is Gossip Girl’s costume designer. And by that I mean “he made Blake the pantless wonder we know today.” Because who is Blake without the fashion stunts? Just another girl with a nice ass. At least Blake represents for her friends. That’s nice of her.

Eric Daman Celebrates You Know You Want It

Eric Daman Celebrates You Know You Want It

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

21 Responses to “Blake Lively steps out in $1595 holey boots & no pants”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NicoleAM says:

    Wait…those are some kind of boots? I thought they were leggings or tights..hmmm

  2. SageAdvice says:

    I think she’s wearing short shorts.

    I hope she’s wearing short shorts.

    I’m clinging to the not-very-likely belief that she’s wearing short shorts.

    How does one even put those boots on? Is there a giant zipper up the back or the inside? Do you roll them on like stockings? if so, how pliable is that material? Do you buy those boots custom made, or is there like, only three pairs or whatever made for people like her with slim legs that go on forever?

    So many questions about so little a thing as a pair of boots…

  3. MooMooMooMooMoo. says:

    That dude looks like Kiefer Sutherland and Rob Schneiders love child.

  4. Cari says:

    Is he grabbing her crotch in that picture???

  5. Ruby Red Lips says:

    You can see her short shorts in the 2nd pic, I think she looks great.

    She’s not being indecent or inappropriate as she is covered up but still looks sexy

    Go Blake, you look fantastic

  6. Danielle says:

    It is vile and putrid for anyone to spend that much money on shoes in these times. That could feed about 50 families right now.

  7. vale says:

    Rather than vile for spending that sum on boots, it’s worse to actually charge that much.
    Nothing costs that much to make.
    Also, was it Gaultier that did something similar a few years ago? Boots that rose all the way up to masquerade as pants. I remember hearing that Elton John had ordered 40 pairs or something like that.

  8. DoMaJoReMc says:

    @ Danielle:
    That was EXACTLY my first thought, but then I thought, “If I post that I will be skewered by the other posters that will argue that it’s HER money to do what SHE wants.” So, I thank you for posting my thoughts…to the letter!!!

  9. Dorothy says:

    She probably can’t afford pants because she spent all her money on those boots!

  10. Neelyo says:

    Who knows if she bought them or borrowed them. Though I guess it would be rather awkward to borrow footwear for the night.

  11. Ruby Red Lips says:

    @ Danielle,

    I’m afraid the world is unfair…just how it goes, there are rich and poor and I can’t see that changing anytime soon

  12. LolaBella says:

    ‘No Pants’ watch continues!

    I like the boots even though they are obscenely expensive and I would never spend that much on a pair.

    Blake probably got them free from Stella McCartney, I mean look at how much publicity her wearing them is generating for the boots!

    She continues to play up her gorgeous, long legs while toning down flashing the chi chis, all in the quest to be seen as a rising, serious actress.
    Good for her!

  13. Firestarter says:

    These celebs rarely, if ever, buy the insanely expensive things they wear on the red carpet. They are either on loan (yes, they do loan out even footwear) or given to them, as another poster said, for the publicity it will generate.

  14. lucy2 says:

    “Boots that rose all the way up to masquerade as pants. I remember hearing that Elton John had ordered 40 pairs or something like that.”

    I just lost my breakfast with that mental image.

  15. lilred says:

    @ Cari: He’s not grabbing her crotch, he’s simply hoping to settle the shorts no shorts debate.

  16. journey says:

    if that blind item was truly about her (the one where the nasty old geezer was trying to ruin her career so she’d jump on his casting couch with him) the internal argument in blake’s head may be, “okay, i can stay in the limelight by going pants-less in public, or i can be pants-less on that nasty old geezer’s casting couch?!” obviously she’d rather be lady godiva than the victim of casting couch syndrome!

  17. ien says:

    the boots themselves are meant to look like pants/leather leggings so I don’t really see the issue of her not wearing pants.

    is she supposed to wear pants on top of the boots and cover them up?? no.

  18. Birdie says:

    ugh those boots are hawt and I wantttt them

  19. *Lee* says:

    I won’t lie, I love the boots.

  20. Hi,what a nice pants,thanks for sharing.I will get one like that.bill