Prince Andrew has free use of a palace in Abu Dhabi, might move there next year

Last week, sources claimed that Prince Andrew was suddenly considering a move out of England. Andrew has been thoroughly thrown under the bus this month when it was revealed that he was good friends with a man who turned out to be a Chinese spy. The spy was even Andrew’s business representative in China, and Andrew was likely getting paid to provide all kinds of access to the spy. While Andrew absolutely deserves to be shamed and mocked for yet another bone-headed association, it also looks like Andrew’s mess is being purposefully pushed as a main story, so people won’t talk about the Chinese spy’s associations with actual Tory leaders and people who genuinely have power. Anyway, last week, we heard that Andrew was contemplating a move to Bahrain. Now he might move to Abu Dhabi?

Prince Andrew may have been frozen out of the British royal family yet again, but another royal family seems keen to adopt him. The prince has been gifted the use of a palace in Abu Dhabi by the country’s autocratic elite, the royal historian and freedom-of-information campaigner Andrew Lownie will claim in a hotly anticipated biography of the prince to be published next year, The Daily Beast can reveal.

The Daily Beast reported this week that several of Andrew’s friends say he could “do a Harry” and flee the U.K. for the Middle East next year after feeling that he has been unfairly treated over his relationship with Yang Tengbo. Yang is a Chinese businessman formerly based in London who has been unmasked as a suspected Chinese spy. He successfully cultivated a close personal and business relationship with Andrew after he was expelled from the royal family (for the first time) after his disastrous BBC interview about his relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Documents found in Yang’s possession highlighting “main talking points” for a call with Andrew said he was “in a desperate situation and will grab on to anything.” Yang ran the Chinese arm of Andrew’s Pitch@Palace initiative, and Andrew was entitled to a 2 percent cut of any investment deals made.

It is a matter of public record that Andrew freely used private palaces owned by the UAE’s ruling House of Nahyan when he was a trade ambassador for the U.K. over a decade ago. However, Lownie, who is writing a biography of the prince due out next year called Entitled: The Controversial Lives of the Duke and Duchess of York, told the Daily Beast that Andrew continues to have exclusive access to at least one fully staffed private palace in the country despite not technically owning it. The revelation will raise yet further questions about how Andrew pays for his lavish lifestyle.

Lownie, who has waged a decade-long freedom-of-information war with royal authorities over access to a laundry list of concealed documents, told the Daily Beast: “Andrew has been given the use of a palace by the Abu Dhabi authorities. It costs them nothing. He has been spending a lot of time out there in recent years and I am told by reliable sources that from next year he may divide his time between the Middle East and the U.K. He is expected to go between the two. It makes sense for him; there is good weather, he is treated with deference, there are a lot of golf courses, and he can conduct his business affairs however he sees fit. The whole family are up to their necks in it. The children, Beatrice and Eugenie, have been out in the Middle East and so has Fergie.”

[From The Daily Beast]

“The whole family are up to their necks in it” – and then names only the York family. Like King Charles isn’t also up to his neck in weird, compromised situations with shady oligarchs and despots. Like Charles’s years of financial messes weren’t covered up and buried by the authorities. Again, Andrew is incredibly stupid and I’m not defending him at all, but he’s doing the same thing as the KING. Speaking of, the Daily Beast also included this statement from Norman Baker, one of my favorite Windsor critics:

Norman Baker, a former British government minister who wrote extensively about the royals’ finances in a book entitled And What Do You Do?—which has a chapter about Prince Andrew titled “The Grand Old Duke of Sleaze”—told the Daily Beast: “While Andrew’s involvement with Epstein was pretty distasteful, the real scandal is his abuse of his position as U.K. trade envoy to enrich himself. Why was he engaged so heavily with this Chinese person, and why was the Chinese person engaged with him? The only logical explanation was he wanted money because he was, to quote the Chinese alleged spy’s email, ‘desperate.’”

“Andrew suffers from a fatal combination of arrogance, stupidity, and greed, which leads him to do the things he does. But actually, the practice of taking something for nothing from an external source, the practice of dealing with unpleasant regimes across the world, the practice of being prepared to hide everything—these are traits that apply to Charles and the rest of the royal family. It’s just they’re rather more subtle about it. It wasn’t very long ago that Charles was captured accepting bags of cash, thousands of pounds of cash in Fortnum & Mason bags, from an overseas donor of dubious integrity. He looked like a mafia boss. So, Andrew in a sense is no different from anybody else. He’s just more clumsy and stupid about it.”

[From The Daily Beast]

Exactly this: Charles “looked like a mafia boss. So, Andrew in a sense is no different from anybody else. He’s just more clumsy and stupid about it.” They’ve all decided that they’re going to hang this mess around Andrew’s neck and make him take the blame for all of it. Which is funny because Andrew sucks, but people should keep in mind that Charles and the other Windsors are corrupt slumlords too. As for Andrew possibly choosing to spend more time in Abu Dhabi… it would not surprise me, just as it would not surprise me if Charles was mostly fine with it.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Prince Andrew has free use of a palace in Abu Dhabi, might move there next year”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Afken says:

    I did used to wonder why the York girls preferred the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix over the European ones. I guess there’s a clue here.

  2. Eurydice says:

    The operative word here is “free.” A free palace, where he’s free do whatever he wants without people breathing down his neck – who wouldn’t want that? It’s a different kind of “Finding Freedom,” isn’t it? Of course, he’ll still be arrogant, stupid and greedy. There’s an old Greek proverb (which loses something in the translation0 – “The pooping bird brings his ass with him.”

    • BeanieBean says:

      I noticed in the article Lownie said that palace ‘costs them nothing’, referring to the ‘authorities’ (whoever they may be). But it costs somebody something. It costs to pay the upkeep, it costs to pay ‘the help’. It’s costing, all right. But who? (whom?)

      • Eurydice says:

        Most of the wealth of Abu Dhabi is held by the royal family, so it shouldn’t be too expensive for them to support Andrew.

      • Christine says:

        But why would they want to? Serious question, what benefit does anyone really get out of Andrew? I have to admit, I don’t understand it at all.

      • Nieve says:

        Emirate of Abu Dhabi is the richest family in the world. They have trillions at their disposal so presumably they have decided that Prince Andrew may be useful in some capacity. Maybe they’re banking on if they keep Andrew out of everyone’s hair the UK gov/ King Charles will look the other way at the vast array of property holdings they have in the UK held in offshore trusts tax free. Just a guess though.

  3. I say good riddance and dont let the door hit him on his way out.

  4. Hannah says:

    I wonder if this was a part of Prince Harry’s noping out of this cesspool. He would have been William’s fall guy for the rest of his life

    * Caveat, not for one second am I saying Andrew was *right* – this is just how the BRF works

    This will be George & Louis in 30 years

    Harry just had the love and support of a strong woman not entrenched in British royalty to help him

    • Shanta says:

      I think that the internal corruption had a lot to do with Harry’s wanting to flee. He knows what’s really going on. I think that it added another layer to his decision to take his family and get out of dodge. He’s the only one who’s gonna come out of this with clean hands

  5. Amy Bee says:

    The Royal Family is a mafia.

  6. Jensa says:

    I’m not sure this is really “free” – whoever is providing him with this facility must expect something in return, surely.
    Also, I can’t help feeling this is some sort of veiled threat from Andrew to Charles. Look after me or I’ll be a loose cannon.

    • ML says:

      ITA, Jensa. Andrew was never the king unlike Juan Carlos, another royal in exile due to financial shenanigans. He’s constantly seemingly been in “need” of money. Why on earth would anyone “gift” a powerless, former heir with money issues a “free” palace anywhere?
      And perhaps not entirely unimportant, he wouldn’t be at the mercy of extradiction to the US.
      I believe he’s being scapegoated, and I hope the roof gets blown off on whatever the royals and politicians are hiding.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Yup, and I said as much just above, before reading your comment. This ‘free’ palace is costing someone something, but what? And whom?

  7. Jais says:

    Sounds like Lowndies is going to have a lot to say about the Yorks in his upcoming book. Andrew and Fergie both are going to get it. I’ll be curious to see how hard he goes on the princesses.

  8. KC says:

    What would anyone get out of Andrew though? At this point, I would think he’s so removed from anything with authority that he has no more influence to peddle or any information to provide. I doubt they want him for his sparkling wit.

  9. JanetDR says:

    I find the “do a Harry” part extremely offensive.

  10. Blubb says:

    Jais: You can hear it in his podcasts, Scandal mongers podcasts. I found them some time ago with telling the truth on Mountbatton, looking critically into royal finances, interesting ones about the war of Wales as in C&D, BUT they are British and anti Harry and Meghan. Going fully into that that Meghan was the bully. Interviewing Lady Campbell, Tina Brown etc on them. Lownie is sprouting the nonsense of a seperation.

    • Jais says:

      Thx! Yeah I’m not surprised that he’s anti-sussex but he’s coming across as also anti-york, especially Fergie which is interesting bc the tabs are genuinely positive towards her nowadays.

    • Lizzie says:

      I’m glad Lownie left the podcast, it’s much better without him. He inserted Meghan into every conversation that they possibly could.

      • SURE says:

        @lizzie It’s interesting you say he’s obsessed with M because he’s very pro WanK which is definitely a prerequisite for being anti-Sussex.

      • SURE says:

        It’s embarrassing the way Lownie praises WanK. The investigative skills he applies to A are completely MIA when it comes to Peggy and the mattress. It’s almost as if he’s been given the green light to go after A so long as he steers clear of scrutinising WanK. I do wonder whether he’s working with one of W or K’s proxies or whether he’s just a died in the wool royalist, who instinctively knows which royal to kiss up to and which one he can afford to take a swipe at.

  11. BeanieBean says:

    Buh-bye!

    But really, ‘The prince has been gifted the use of a palace in Abu Dhabi by the country’s autocratic elite, the royal historian and freedom-of-information campaigner Andrew Lownie will claim in a hotly anticipated biography of the prince to be published next year, The Daily Beast can reveal.’

    If the book isn’t published til next year, isn’t Lownie going to look like an idiot when Andrew is still sitting there ensconced in Royal Lodge?

  12. Lizzie says:

    Does the FBI still want to speak to Andrew? Would he be protected in Abu Dhabi?

  13. khaveman says:

    A residence in a foreign country? Bugged and tapped to the hilt. Don’t say or do the wrong thing!

  14. Lau says:

    Maybe he’ll become an influencer while there.

  15. Karmaflower says:

    Hide all the underage girls and toesucking men.

  16. Janine Gregory says:

    Hopefully he disappears never to reappear.