Last week, the Princess of Wales went on a field trip with some schoolkids. They took a bus to the National Portrait Gallery and checked out a new interactive exhibition for children. In the days after the field trip, we learned that it was likely something NPG put together with the school, and NPG likely asked their royal patron to ride along, which is exactly what Kate did. Hilariously, this outing came just a few days after Kensington Palace briefed far and wide that they would no longer speak about Kate’s clothing or provide fashion IDs. Those briefings did not go over well, and neither did Kate’s muddled outfit for the NPG outing – charcoal trousers, charcoal turtleneck and a shapeless brown blazer. Well, now the blazer’s designer is speaking out – even though Kate doesn’t want to talk about clothes, for the love of god – and saying that Kate is “one of a kind” and more.
Kate Middleton’s style choices are a reflection of her priorities, in more ways than one. When the Princess of Wales wore a minimalist outfit to visit an art gallery on Feb. 4, the look seemed to underscore a recent report that the palace would be focusing less on what she wears and more on her charitable causes. However, the designer of the chocolate brown wool-blend blazer she wore to hang out with kindergarten kids at the National Portrait Gallery recently says that her style directive is so appealing because of its simplicity, not in spite of it.
“I think she looks much more modern in the way she dresses now,” Petar Petrov, the Austrian-based designer tells PEOPLE. “She looks relaxed, and I think she can win the hearts of people even more because she feels like a real person that people can connect with, like Princess Diana. That’s special and makes her even more relevant than ever.”
The designer, whose celebrity clients include Nicole Kidman and Zoe Saldana, says he had no idea that Princess Kate was going to wear the blazer until he saw pictures of her getting off the minibus outside the museum in London.
“We were so surprised when this happened! We don’t know which retailer she bought it from but we are so happy to see she bought it independently and wears it so well,” he says.
The $1,530 jacket sold out within 24 hours. The designer says, “We have had a lot of requests! We are continually trying to restock the blazer. She definitely has an impact, and we have experienced the ‘Kate Effect’ — and we are enjoying it!”
On how the impact differs from his other clients, the designer says, “We are used to working with Hollywood celebrities, but she is not that sort of celebrity, Kate is a very different thing entirely, she is truly one of a kind. She is not a movie star or a top model, she is an amazing addition for us.”
I’m sorry, this jacket costs HOW MUCH? $1530 for that?? For some reason, I thought of that Alessandra Rich interview from a few years ago, where she was basically like… sure, I’m glad Kate wears my pieces but people get the wrong impression of my clothes because Kate makes them look so fussy and conservative. I think that’s a consistent designer dilemma – I know people roll their eyes at “The Kate Effect” at this point, but it’s true that Kate can and sometimes does give designers exposure. The problem for those designers is that Kate tends to bring all of her fussy, buttony, doily energy to their pieces. All I’ll say is that seeing Kate in this jacket did not make me want to see what else the designer is doing, you know?
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, Backgrid.
- London, UK, 04 February 2025: Catherine, The Princess of Wales joined a group of four and five-year-old school children at the National Portrait.Gallery and launched a new project from The Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood aimed at supporting young children in the development of crucial social and emotional skills.,Image: 960115465, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Arthur Edwards/Avalon/Avalon
- London, UK, 04 February 2025: Catherine, The Princess of Wales joined a group of four and five-year-old school children at the National Portrait.Gallery and launched a new project from The Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood aimed at supporting young children in the development of crucial social and emotional skills.,Image: 960115471, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Arthur Edwards/Avalon/Avalon
- London, UNITED KINGDOM – Catherine, Princess of Wales At The National Portrait Gallery. Pictured: Catherine, Princess of Wales BACKGRID USA 4 FEBRUARY 2025 BYLINE MUST READ: Timmie / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- London, UNITED KINGDOM – Catherine, Princess of Wales At The National Portrait Gallery. Pictured: Catherine, Princess of Wales BACKGRID USA 4 FEBRUARY 2025 BYLINE MUST READ: Timmie / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- London, UNITED KINGDOM – Catherine, Princess of Wales At The National Portrait Gallery. Pictured: Catherine, Princess of Wales BACKGRID USA 4 FEBRUARY 2025 BYLINE MUST READ: Timmie / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- London, UNITED KINGDOM – Catherine, Princess of Wales At The National Portrait Gallery. Pictured: Catherine, Princess of Wales BACKGRID USA 4 FEBRUARY 2025 BYLINE MUST READ: Timmie / BACKGRID USA: +1 310 798 9111 / usasales@backgrid.com UK: +44 208 344 2007 / uksales@backgrid.com *UK Clients – Pictures Containing Children Please Pixelate Face Prior To Publication*
- The Princess of Wales joins a group of four and five-year-old school children from All Souls CE Primary School at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) to launch a new project from The Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood aimed at supporting young children in the development of crucial social and emotional skills. Featuring: Catherine, Princess of Wales Where: London, United Kingdom When: 04 Feb 2025 Credit: Cover Images
- The Princess of Wales departs after joining a group of four and five-year-old school children from All Souls CE Primary School at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) to launch a new project from The Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood aimed at supporting young children in the development of crucial social and emotional skills Featuring: Catherine, Princess of Wales Where: London, United Kingdom When: 04 Feb 2025 Credit: Cover Images
- The Princess of Wales departs after joining a group of four and five-year-old school children from All Souls CE Primary School at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) to launch a new project from The Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood aimed at supporting young children in the development of crucial social and emotional skills Featuring: Catherine, Princess of Wales Where: London, United Kingdom When: 04 Feb 2025 Credit: Cover Images
Oh she’s one of a kind alright and not in a good way. She has no fashion sense, she likes to copy. She likes to have us think she has substance but she proves over and over that she doesn’t. Can’t is a fake and a fraud nothing more.
No, she’s not. Sadly she’s an air-headed clothes horse who is not aging well. Nothing more.
The little girl picking her nose is sending me.
That’s all I got.
The bus exiting one is doing it for me. It shows us who Kate really is, and how she does not care AT ALL about anything related to royal work.
I would like to nominate the nose picking photo to go in the permanent archive like some of the other classics that stay on rotation when a non-event specific picture is needed for a story. Like Camilla with the horse ears.
And note that Kate held the same hand the little girl picked her nose with. Apparently before she picked her nose, fortunately.😆 But the grimace on Kate’s face is priceless.
How much did they pay him to admit that, that monstrosity was his? The way she styled it was bad.
Also, I hope he is prepared for bankruptcy. He should ask the designer of those prairie dresses and that vampire dress how her association with their brands went.
Also, I thought her outfit was comprised of highstreet finds? Now there is a designer?
@Jennifer … Oh, someone definitely called in a favor and got this designer to do this article. I wouldn’t have thought anything about it but the wording was suspect. How many times have we read about the ‘Meghan Effect’ with clothes and designers?
Don’t get me wrong. Kate has, and has had, fashion moments. But they’re not organic. Kensington Palace is trying so hard to style her after Princess Diana but they can’t. Diana would wear something chic to lunch with girl friends or out on her own, etc. Kate doesn’t do any of that unless it’s staged.
I wouldn’t be surprised. Kate has drifted too far from her own style, that’s why she does not move clothes as before.
Yeah, the “Kate Effect” was a much bigger deal back when she frequently wore accessible brands like Reiss, Whistles, etc.
Bespoke Emilia Wickstead and McQueen aren’t exactly going to be flying off the shelves no matter who wears it.
Not another “isn’t Kathy wonderful” build her up fluff piece🤦🏼♀️.. it’s getting old, and beyond nauseating.
Apparently a KP spox came out today to say Oooops!@ my bad, it was I, not kitty, who said no more talk about her clothes but her ‘work.’ Please ignore; go ahead, please talk about her clothes. And her work.
Carry on.
Her wig work is awful and never ceases to amaze me and she just looks so haggard and miserable all the time. Damn girl, damn.
I’m wondering if this is why KP said they didn’t want to talk about fashion. So the designers would come out and do it for them? I have no idea but I still don’t like the shaming way KP said they are only talking about substance and never fashion.
@jais, exactly. She gets far more exposure by letting the stores/ designers sing her praises.
I’ve found that jacket a hundred times hanging at my local Thrift store on the SALE rack. Yep, she’s definitely not a super model.
I love an oversized blazer but that one is awful and the price is ridiculous imo.
Exactly! There may be a way to showcase it more effectively but this isn’t it.
It’s the reverse of when you look at cheap clothes online and have to look closely to realise they would not look that good in real life.
Oh Kaiser thank you for your photo choices. I didn’t see these last week and you made me just spit out my tea. The photo with the girl picking her nose? Chefs kiss. Kate looks soooo over it.
Kate, please get your hair cut shorter, and wear it neater. It’s aging you unnecisssarily. And make sure you don’t wear black with brown and also that the light is on when you dress.
I really thought that she would emerge from her illness with a shorter hair cut.
I love long hair, but hers is out of control at this point. She could chop six inches off (of her hair, or her wiglets, or whatever is going on there) and STILL have very long hair, but it would look a little bit neater.
Of course, she’s one of a kind – she’s the only Princess of Wales.
And I don’t know about the designer or the cost, but she looks like she dressed out of the laundry bin. The fabric should not be sagging and wrinkling like that.
Dressed out of the laundry bin — and in the dark.
This is spectacularly bad, and I’d be too ashamed to claim this sad sackas my own.
As to PoW: FewchaKween may be the only contemporary one, but I think we can all agree that there’s only one *Princess* of Wales who truly deserved that title — the Queen of Hearts, Diana, who not only looked the part, including posture, but also took voluntary elocution lessons.
Unlike this one, who can’t be bothered.
I stand by my theory that she (or a minion) had a challenge to find an outfit in a charity (thrift) shop in ten minutes and this is what she came up with.
Yup. She’s neither a model or actress. She was an absolute nothing who simply climbed her way to the top—and still has nothing to show for it beyond giving birth to 3 privileged kids to perpetuate the monarchy.
I don’t believe “climbing” was the position she employed to rise to the top.
Oooh my, 😳 got it in one!
Models and actresses have to actually work.
She’s one of a kind alright, not a lot of people could spin nothingness into all this constant talk of them working.
She is nothing like Diana. Kate is lazy always has been
I thought they were on the don’t focus on my clothes trai. For Kate.
KP came out today and took that back.
Actually, it was a “spokesman ” of the Princess of Wales…it does make you wonder about the underlying war that seems to exist between KP and Kate….
I think I had a jacket like that in the 90s, before I could afford good tailoring. Wait, her jacket cost how much?
Who is that woman behind Kate who looks soooo pleased with herself for being photographed with her? And Kate looks like she’d rather be anywhere else in the world than at this visit.
I enjoyed that lady’s glee, too 😂
Okay, I’m laughing cuz this story might need an update. KP just went on record to say Kate never said this only substance no fashion thing and a spokesperson from KP spoke out of turn. A mess.
What??? 🤣🤣
Apparently Cameron, forgot his last name? at GBnews got an exclusive and urgent clarification from KP about this. No idea if it’s true or not. The messiness just makes laugh.
I thought that the clarification came from a spoker person for the Princess of Wales…not KP.
Hmm. I didn’t pay attention to whether the spokesperson was from KP or just the princess of Wales. But the main thing was that it was being called an official clarification, which would suggest KP? Which is wild.
Someone didn’t like that Rose Hanbury article…this must be a record for how fast KP walked back a claim about Kate that didn’t have to anything do with her hair!
That is the most bizarre walkback. Like even if Kate didn’t want someone to say that whole substance not style thing – now it sounds like KP is admitting that without the clothes, there is nothing else to talk about.
Probably the quickest walk back they have done too.
It is a mess over there.
So her recent outfits have NOT been about trying to take the conversation away from her outfits?
Those are some bold sartorial choices if it was meant to be BAU on the clothes front.
What is going on with these people??
hey M&S make long sleeve thermals that can be worn with Jackets then throw a nice scarf around your neck, the turtle neck has been done to death
Kate has no fashion sense. This outfit would have looked better if she wore a matching pants or a matching top and a black pants.
Oh, gadzooks! Matching pants? I cannot imagine what a wrinkly mess that would have been!
She’s a celebrity in expensive clothing.
Jacket OK but not worth all that money, it’s nothing special the outfit underneath is fine as well, what’s wrong, putting a dark brown jacket with a dark grey trousers and a black top. She must have hundreds of jackets, finding one that looked better with grey couldn’t have been that hard.
That is a very basic blazer.
It reminds me of the one I wore as part of my Catholic high school uniform.
Outside the UK, many people don’t GAF about K. The last time she broke the internet was when she went “unmissing”.
In my opinion Kate looks tired and bedraggled. The blazer looked like a sack, unstructured and limp. I get the designer wanting credit but the way it looked in her, I would keep my thoughts to myself.
I’ve seen better tailored Mango blazers
That jacket is available for markdown at every Marshalls in America.
That header quote made me laugh; ‘one of a kind, not a movie star or a top model’…that describes pretty much every other woman on the planet, no? With all that wealth, privilege and platform, she could do so much good and be extraordinary! Her waste of the rare space she occupies is a screaming shame.
Of course she isn’t. Becoming a movie star or a top model involves getting up off one’s ass and working. Not. Gonna. Happen.
We are TWO of a kind: I too am neither a movie star nor a model.
We look down on you, who must be movie stars and models. Maybe both!