People: Netflix does not plan on renewing the Sussexes’ production deal

Wait… what is going on? People Magazine is now reporting, based on an article from The Sun, that Netflix will not be renewing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s contract this year. People Mag has started picking up stories from the British tabloids with some frequency this year, but they also say that their own “Hollywood insider” source is saying the same thing, that the Sussexes’ deal will not be renewed.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s multiyear deal with Netflix will not be renewed when it expires in September. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex signed a reported $100 million agreement with the streaming service in 2020. Now, as the contract nears its end, it will conclude without renewal, The Sun reports.

A Hollywood insider confirms to PEOPLE that the couple’s production deal will not be extended, reflecting a shift in Netflix’s broader business strategy.

“There’s no animosity from either side,” a source tells The Sun. “Things have just run their course.”

PEOPLE reached out to representatives for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Netflix for comment.

The news comes as new viewership data has been released for the Duchess of Sussex’s lifestyle series, With Love, Meghan, which premiered on March 4. According to Netflix’s latest Engagement Report, released on July 17 and covering the first half of 2025, the series ranked at No. 383 with 5.3 million views.

The couple’s 2022 docuseries Harry & Meghan remains Netflix’s most-watched documentary debut to date.

“Netflix were clever in that they got a hell of a lot of viewers for the first documentary series, and knew, realistically, it would prove the zenith of content from the Montecito pair,” the source told The Sun. “They’re not unhappy with how things turned out — they got those initial hits, and produced one of the most talked-about shows of all time,” the source added.

[From People]

I don’t know what to say. My prediction was that the deal would be renewed in a different form, meaning a contract based more on Meghan building her brand and doing cooking/lifestyle programming, and that Harry would be jettisoned. If this is true, that also means that the Daily Fail’s stupid “cousin’s neighbor’s brother-in-law’s hairdresser’s Netflix source” was right. God, this is going to set off the absolute worst Sussex storyline – prepare yourselves. I hope that Meredith Maines convinces them to handle this better than the Spotify situation a few years ago.

Photos courtesy of Netflix.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

100 Responses to “People: Netflix does not plan on renewing the Sussexes’ production deal”

  1. Tessa says:

    Who is this source

  2. Blogger says:

    They have eggs in other baskets so even if Netflix falls through, they’re still not returning.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      I’m surprise because I absolutely love her show… but I will follow the Sussex’s projects wherever they are aired. Other than the rabid tabloids loosing their minds this is just normal Hollywood stuff that happens.

    • Advisor2u says:

      I don’t think that H&M themselves want a big production deal this time, because of all the new interests they have now. Meghan isn’t even talking about her being a Producer/Production Entrepreneur, lately.

      I thing a new Netflix production deal will indeed only be with Meghan reg. livestyle content, like, “With love Meghan”. And she has a 5 to 7 partnership deal with Netflix already with her business “As Ever”. That in it self is worth some tens, maybe hundred of millions, if we take into consideration that she will offering hospitality goods/merchandise in the future.

      And Harry is starting his own business too. Their spokesperson said that the announcement reg. this will happen in September. I’m guessing in the field of Mental Fitness/Health, Sports, or his own Investment/VC Business.

      But, out ot the old 5 year deal, they still have the “Meet me at the Lake” production coming up. Or is this one cancelled? There has been no updates from either parties (or the author), since last year September.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        @Advisor2u, I was coming here to say the same thing. Back in 2020, a Netflix deal was a necessity onto which everything in the Sussex lives depended on. 5 years have gone by, times have changed, people have too. I would be surprised if this decision is not primarily driven by the Sussexes themselves. Now, after 5 years and 2 preschoolers, new businesses, Travalyst booming, IG on its way to becoming a recurring event for many decades to come, As Ever doing so well and them raising a young family, priorities have shifted IMO. Ted Sarandos, having been in business for a very long time, understood that too. That’s why it was a 5 and not a 10 year contract, every side knew in 5 years there would be different stands on several different points. Meghan chose to not podcast anymore, even though her podcasts did so well, that alone tells you something. These Sussexes chicks have been fledging for a while now. And with Ted Sarandos blessings, they are flying out of the nest, it’s that simple.

  3. Dee(2) says:

    This doesn’t sound new, this sounds like them repurposing exactly what Ted sarandos said a few months ago.

    ” I don’t want to comment on anyone’s renewals. In general, the ones that we’ve had are bespoke and rationalized around output. I think of them as ‘show-verall’ deals. We outline what we’re going to do together over the next five years and package it in a deal.” This is from People’s own article.

    https://people.com/meghan-markle-underestimated-overly-dismissed-says-netflix-ceo-11699802

    The rest is them regurgitating what The Sun’s source is saying not anyone from Netflix or the Sussexes team. It sounds like they won’t have a big 5-year deal with expectations for output, but will reach out to them to do one off shows or specials as both sides see fit. That seems pretty reasonable and rational and the current post covid streaming boom era.

    • Megan says:

      A lot has changed in the world of streaming over the past five years. No one is getting the kind of deals Netflix was making during the pandemic when people were literally watching everything.

    • SaraTor says:

      Page Six days she will be signing a “First Look Deal” with Netflix instead of a production deal. I have heard of these deals before with actors and celebrities, but I don’t really know what that means. I think the story should be “Meghan switches her Netflix contract from a Production Deal to a First Look Contract”.

      According to Google it means “A “first-look deal” is an agreement in the entertainment industry where a production company, studio, or network gains the exclusive, initial opportunity to review and potentially acquire new projects developed by a writer, producer, or other talent. It essentially grants the buyer the “first look” at the material before it’s offered to other potential buyers, often in exchange for a development fee or other compensation.
      Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects:
      What it is:
      Exclusive Rights:
      The buyer (studio, network, etc.) gets the first chance to evaluate and potentially option or purchase the project.
      Development Fee:
      The buyer often pays a fee to the creator for the right to review the project first.
      Pre-determined Period:
      The deal is usually for a specific duration, such as a year or multiple years.
      Freedom to Shop Elsewhere:
      If the buyer passes on the project, the creator is then free to shop it to other potential buyers.
      In the film and television industry:
      Producers and Studios:
      A common example is a deal between a producer and a studio, where the studio gets the first look at the producer’s new projects.
      Writers and Production Companies:
      A writer might have a first-look deal with a production company, granting them the first opportunity to consider their scripts.
      Talent and Studios:
      First-look deals are also common with actors and directors who have their own production companies, like Margot Robbie’s LuckyChap and Warner Bros.
      Examples:
      Alan Cumming’s deal with NBCUniversal, Jake Gyllenhaal’s deal with Amazon MGM Studios.
      Why it’s beneficial:
      For the buyer:
      It secures access to promising projects, potentially leading to hit films or shows.
      For the seller:
      It provides a guaranteed avenue for their work to be seen by a potential buyer and offers financial compensation upfront.

      • Hypocrisy says:

        That is kind of what I thought would happen after the initial five year contract.. it just makes sense for both sides truthfully.

      • Snapdragon 23 says:

        SaraTor’s “First Look” approach sounds logical and beneficial to all parties. Ted Sarandos and Meghan do seem to be on the same wavelength.

    • Kathleen says:

      Did anyone think the Sussexes were going to be under contract to Netflix for the rest of their lives? The 5 year contract ends in September but there will be other short term agreements. This is normal. Harry and Meghan have many more irons in the fire,

  4. ThatGirlThere says:

    Who’s the source? Maybe they’re moving to another production company? They’ll be fine.

  5. Fandango says:

    This sounds like ‘let’s not look at the billionaire royals and their grifting family, on a massive yacht owned by a foreign gov’. And the bags of diamonds and cash they’re also giving!

    Netflix have stated they adore the Sussexes. Who believes this stuff? Derangers, obviously.

    • SussexWatcher says:

      Exactly this. To quote the great Jaida Essence Hall, “look over there!”

    • Dee(2) says:

      Yeah I don’t ever respect the British media to provide an honest accounting, but it’s annoying when the American Media starts to carry water and do “look squirrel!!” for them too.

      The dynamics of a deal changing after 5 years is not odd, especially not when one of the parties has an incredibly successful new venture that they’re working on as well. The British media needs for the Sussexes to fail though so they won’t ever be honest, but People could do better.

      Citizens are asking their King, ” what have you done for me lately?” to his face and the presence of wells and her kids are getting booed at trooping the color but this is what they want to focus on. Probably because the Heir is on his sixth or 7th vacation of the year currently.

      • sunnyside up says:

        While I side with the ‘not my King’ lot they should have stopped when the children were passing by. It isn’t their fault that William is their father. Kate chose her position, so she is fair game.

      • Square2 says:

        @SUNYSIDE UP Getting boo at the Trooping was a good learning experience for them. Those children have been living in their gilded mansions since their birth. Considering G & C’s reactions when meeting with a disabled kid at the Wimbledon, it’s better for them to contact with REAL world as often as possible. A learned why some people were disabled from Harry, and he’s younger than G, C & L. The Wales’ kids need to know & accept that not every one in the UK think the Royal Family with high regards, and there are other people exist other than their circles of well-to-do classmates, their families, and friends.

    • jais says:

      William is en route on his helicopter from the helipad on his borrowed yacht as we speak. Actually I don’t know the exact timing but you get my drift.

  6. Over it says:

    I have no clue if this is true or not but I would like to know if it is true, what happens to the book they were supposed to be turning into a movie? Do they still get to do it.?

    • Chantale says:

      To have a movie made takes a longtime and sometimes does not make it to the finish line. Ask any actor actress and writer

  7. Amy Bee says:

    Considering we were getting conflicting stories about this I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. When Polo came out I was speculating that the focus going forward was going to be on Meghan’s show nothing else. I still believe that.

  8. SussexWatcher says:

    If People is using the British tabloids as a source then, first, shame on them. But also there’s no guarantee what People says is actually accurate if they are sourcing known liars. It says People reached out to Netflix and the Sussexes for comment but doesn’t say they received any comment or confirmation. Again, shame on People for running this speculation from a source who lies for a living.

    Also, yes maybe the Netflix contract for Meghan AND Harry will not be renewed, but that doesn’t mean Meghan herself (or via As Ever, etc) would not get a brand new contract. Something being renewed is different that a new contract so technically they could be correct but also still be wrong with the spirit of the “reporting.” Netflix is partnering with As Ever to put it in brick and mortar stores, right? So why would they end their partnership in 2 months?

    • sevenblue says:

      Yeah, that is also what I think. They did docs they were interested in. They had a movie deal as far as I remember, but other than that, I think they would go on with Meghan specific content now since Harry has other jobs.

    • sunnyside up says:

      I agree, the Sun is a very poor source of information, personally I shall believe it when Harry or Meghan says that they no longer have a contract.

  9. Nikki (Toronto) says:

    I had hoped Netflix and the Sussexes were providing misleading information to garner more press coverage for the new contract. However, if it isn’t renewed, I feel sorry for them, because it will be made into a bigger deal than needed. Truthfully, most of these picture deals don’t get reupped.

  10. Krista says:

    I don’t get it? The show is being given a second season, and the first did great numbers despite the British press saying otherwise. And didn’t Netflix partner with her As Ever brand? That doesn’t sound like it won’t be renewed.

    • Ginger says:

      I feel like the renewal will be with different terms and focus on Meghan only.

      • DWI says:

        agree, but they’re making it sound like netflix dumped them and now they’ll have no stream of money coming in…

    • Meredith says:

      They filmed all the episodes at the same time, they just split them into two seasons (maybe to give As Ever a chance to ramp up).

  11. M says:

    Lol sure, Jan. We don’t know what is happening until there is a formal announcement. People magazine report whatever gets them clicks. I don’t know where the idea of them being more legitimate came from.

  12. Ginger says:

    I think the deal will end with Harry and Meghan and Meghan will have her own deal with Netflix since they are an investor in her business and she has her show there. Harry will either find his own deal somewhere or not. I’m curious what Harry will do

    • Amy Bee says:

      My guess is Harry will continue with his main focus which was always his charity work. The signs were there when he didn’t promote Polo last year.

    • somebody says:

      What he’s been doing-speaking engagements, working for Travalyst and BetterUp. Maybe more written content?

      • Ginger says:

        Agree. He has been doing more speaking engagements lately. Would love some more written content as well.

  13. Monika says:

    What happened with the film rights of the novel “Meet me at the lake” which Meghan and Harry acquired with the co-operation of Netflix as part of the current deal? Is this not happening now?

    • Barb Mill says:

      According to google, a relatively small fraction of books for which film rights are purchased actually get made into movies or TV series.

      • Polo says:

        It takes years to get those produced. They could still do a movie specific deal with them for the book.

    • Monika says:

      Thanks both of you for clarifying this. It is probably wait and see what happens.

  14. Becks1 says:

    I’m not worried about this for a few reasons – first, this is just from an article in the Sun, which is poor sourcing on People’s part but it happens.

    Second, I would not be surprised if the contract is renewed but under very different terms (streaming looks different than it did 5 years ago) or just renewed with Meghan under a more narrow focus.

    Third – I don’t think this is acrimonious at all no matter what happens as Netflix is partnered with As Ever. I don’t see them doing that if they’re just planning on cutting all ties a few months later.

    Fourth and finally – even if this is the end of the Sussexes and Netflix, it doesn’t seem like there’s bad blood and the Sussexes will move on to the next stage of their lives (maybe they’re the ones who don’t want to do Netflix anymore, IDK.)

  15. Tina says:

    If this is true I’m not shocked. I think the Netflix deal gave them money and work while they got settled but their interests are elsewhere now. I think Meghan is all in on As ever and there’s more opportunities there. I could see them doing a one off show with Netflix when there was an interest but not this type of production deal which everyone seems to be moving away from. But yah the tabloids will go nuts with this.

  16. Jais says:

    LOL. Listen I just wanna know. Does this mean I’m not getting my WLM holiday specials? Bc I’ve been holding out for some holiday specials. Guess we’ll see…

    • Lurker says:

      I think it is very likely that they will give Meghan a contract for With Love Meghan and pay her per show. She would be free to concentrate on As Ever and film 2 seasons of WLM in a few months, with breaks inbetween. Like this year, one season in spring, one in the fall, both filmed at the same time. Add a holiday special, which would take how long to film, a week or two without post production, which they can show as a Christmas special. Gives both parties much more freedom than a “you have to deliver xx shows/docus/films in xx years” as their contract has been.

      Harry has different interests, good for him. He might want to make a documentary about one of his projects, which he can sell to Netflix or another streaming service, but he has no pressure. Speaking engagements, BetterUp, Travalyst, Invictus, WellChild, Halo, Scottie’s Little Soldiers, something to replace Sentabale (maybe), he has quite enough on his plate without producing content for Netflix. He hinted on a new project to come, we will see.

      Both are in a much better place than they had been years ago. Netflix was a godsend windfall they desperately needed. Now they found their footing and can decide which of their projects to prioritize.

  17. Julie says:

    As far as I am concerned, the only credible sources are the Sussexes and Netflix. None of them have said a word. So, lets wait and see.

    • Angied says:

      Yeah I’m thinking they may come out with a response before this gets out of hand. Better to tackle it now before it’ gets ridiculous. I know a lot of people don’t like People magazine but it’s the bible of putting out celebrities stories. Harry has used them to put out stories about him. If this story is true I don’t understand as to why they didn’t put out their story first to prevent or at least limit this kind of speculation.

      • Lee says:

        It’s gonna get out of hand regardless because we have trolls and British media amplifying everything sadly. Everyone will now be doing a 5 yr recap/essay/dissertation on Meghan especially.
        All kinds of harassment and hate when in reality this is all normal business.
        Her show will still air and they’ll still produce another season or maybe move to another streamer.

      • sevenblue says:

        @Angied, maybe they didn’t finalize whatever they are working with Netflix yet. So, how can they announce something not ready? That is why the media is putting these pieces out there, to get a response from them.

      • Kel says:

        @angied it’s kinda hard to do that if you’re still in negotiations and had the British tabloids at your heels.
        I feel like there will be an announcement of some kind of deal most likely for Meghan soon. Whether it’s with Netflix I’m not sure…

      • sunnyside up says:

        Perhaps they don’t know anything, Is it just another story created by the media, come to think of it, we have had this sort of story before.

  18. Chrissie T says:

    I think Harry in particular has moved on from the Spotify and Netflix phase. He must be hoping to finish the last court case and draw a line under this part of his life. He was born in the public eye but I don’t think he has any interest in being a celebrity or being in the spotlight unless it’s for an interview like the BBC if he has something to say or to promote his charities. I’m curious to know what he does next in terms of making money because I think he will have been working on something. Meghan will focus on her brand, whether she does it with Netflix, solo or with another investor.

    • Ginger says:

      I would love for Harry to have a podcast somewhere ( not Spotify). He would be really good. Like someone said, he would continue with speaking engagements and his charity work.

    • Tina says:

      There have been a couple of stories hinting that Harry has been working on something. Very vague so might be nothing but it will be interesting to watch.

    • Fandango says:

      Harry’s an investor. He’s spoken at investor seminars with high level people. He’s spoken about investing. That’s his things along with everything else he does.

  19. Snuffles says:

    I think they are playing fast as loose with semantics. If I had to guess, Harry is out and there will be a new restructured deal centering around Meghan.

  20. Plum says:

    Why would Netflix renew? Harry hasn’t made much impact in terms of streaming numbers and WLM could find a home elsewhere with a bigger audience for lifestyle shows. As Ever is very niche and I’d argue that it only solidified Meghan’s narrow fan base.

    • sevenblue says:

      The main goal of Netflix signing them was to get their doc and they did. It is still getting millions of views. As Ever had the highest numbers in its own category. Why are you comparing it to big productions like tabloids did? Meghan is selling out every time she puts her products to the market. How is that “narrow” fanbase?

      • Plum says:

        I didn’t compare As Ever to any big productions and if all Netflix wanted was H&M’s doc, then what else is on offer? There’s nothing wrong with having a niche brand or a specific audience. This describes the majority of all small businesses. However, selling out of product doesn’t automatically signify mass appeal.

      • sevenblue says:

        @Plum, WLM has a big audience on Netflix. Why should she look for another home? In production contracts, you get one for you / one for me deals. I doubt, Netflix ever thought a doc about polo would bring a lot of eyeballs. But, they already achieved numbers with H&M doc. Selling out means there is a big consumer market there for the brand. That is not “niche”. I have never seen people fighting over to get jam like they are concert tickets. Any company would looove Meghan’s “niche” market.

    • Jais says:

      A narrow fan base in the states is still pretty good numbers. Plus the global fans.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Having a niche has made a lot of money for some people so there’s nothing wrong with Meghan having one.

    • windyriver says:

      While I’m sure Gabriel, Sarah, Patrick et. al. have their fans, I’d say the exceptional success of Suits after it debuted on Netflix – nearly 60 billion minutes and breaking multiple streaming records – was in due in significant part to Meghan, whose documentary with Harry had premiered on Netflix six months before. And I’m sure Netflix is plenty happy with that, even if shows like HOI and Polo did very modest numbers.

      Obviously, the massive viewership seen with Suits wouldn’t necessarily translate to an ongoing fan base for Meghan, but I’d say her initial success with her own As ever products selling out in hours, as well as the spike in sales for related products – her clothes, her jewelry, home goods in her shows – and the general buzz around items she’s associated with (Le Creuset) indicate her overall appeal and fan base is more than niche, even if not reflected in similarly huge viewing numbers for WLM. Remember too, her impact is amplified beyond the WLM shows. Multiple outlets, including the DM, did articles on where to buy the household items seen there, as well as the beauty/cosmetic items listed on her Shopmy page, so people didn’t have to watch to buy something affiliated with her. Heck, there were several articles about how she does her nail polish as seen in WLM, and where to buy the materials. (Personally, I’m still waiting for Cuyana to restock that hat.) There’s a good reason Netflix is partnered with her for As ever, and Ted Sarandos is a personal fan.

      It sounds like Harry may be going in a different direction with less future involvement with Netflix productions, but we’ll have to see.

  21. LadyE says:

    I think this is just clever playing with words. I think technically the $100 million deal will not be “renewed”, key word renewed modifying that specific *deal*. Meaning there will not be a renewal on the same terms, i.e. 5 years, $100 million, for undefined output.

    That does NOT mean there is not a NEW “deal”, with new terms and potential ceiling based on performance. This is what I always expected given how H&M’s careers have developed over the past 5 years and their current focus.

    I really think this is making a massive story out of nothing and just the media playing with the word “renew” to create click bait. People Magazine, you are gross.

  22. Polo says:

    Guys realistically they were never going to renew in the same terms. They didn’t renew with the obamas and they had way more output. They’ll do what they are doing with the obamas and other creators which Ted said already a few months ago.
    Now the tabloids will turn this into a massive shtshow and hopefully Meredith can get ahead of it all but I agree brace yourself for the opinion pieces and drama.

  23. Iheoma Nwakpadolu says:

    This is a natural progression. If there was as it was, it would mean that the Sussexes have not progressed in 5 years. Good, they dont need to be tied to the apronstrings of Netflix. Now they can partner with not only Netflix but other streamers depending on the nature of the project.

  24. Gemini says:

    TBH I was kind of expecting this. It was obvious for a long time now Meghan and Harry do not see a future for themselves as producers. We had no news about the scripted shows or movies they had in the pipeline. Meghan said she has no time to do another season of her podcast because of As Ever. How can she have time to produce a tv show or movie? So it is only natural for them to free themselves from the obligations of this production deal with Netflix. It is not a failure. It is a change of investment. Their business partnership with Netflix is not over, it has evolved to consumer products with As Ever. As Meghan said in the podcast, she is now dealing with people in another building in Netflix. But I agree with Kaiser we should expect a torrent of terrible coverage about this and I hope they make a detailed announcement themselves to control the narrative.

    • Polo says:

      I love how you explained this! Yeah I think I’m gonna checkout for the week cause it’s gonna be brutal.
      Pair this with the meeting in the UK and the conspiracy theories are gonna be insane

    • Jais says:

      She did say she was focused on her asever business. Although I do think the show can help with promoting the business. But Meghan did say they were purposely independent of each other. I don’t need full seasons. Just a few holiday specials now and then lol.

      • Gemini says:

        We do not know whether WLM falls under the 5 year production deal or under the As Ever investment although WLM and As Ever are separate entities. I am leaning to see WLM under the new investment deal so hopefully we will get more seasons and holiday specials.

        The way I see it, As Ever and WLM is like a pilot (if it’s the right word) programming for Netflix to try their hand at a shopping network like business model. Watch the show, buy the product type of thing. It is obviously successful. For example if the ad you run on tv (WLM was an ad for As Ever let’s be real) causes you to sell out your product, you do not care about the ratings of the ad. Netflix might invest in another talent with the same business model to sell other products and to partner with other brands. Meghan is a trailblazer.

      • jais says:

        That makes sense. I’m curious and excited to see where it all goes.

    • Square2 says:

      “How can she have time to produce a tv show or movie…”

      H&M have a production company, Archewell Productions. The team of Archewell Productions will do the majority of ground works for brainstorming, developing & producing projects with inputs from H&M.

      Essentially, Netflix signed with Archewell Productions, not Harry and Meghan as TALENTS to participate in other people’s shows that’s not priduced/co-produced by Archewell back then.

      Even the Obamas had poor viewing numbers show with Netflix. It’s just no one bothered to talk about it much. The Sussex are always (unfairly) treated with different higher standards.

  25. Tara says:

    I am team “ contract for As Ever”, too. I think M & H are deliberately splitting up their professional projects. And I find that is just wise, to build a family’s life on several income streams. Especially if one gets so continuously attacked as them. It is also good for family life to have two different occupations.

  26. Jazzz says:

    I can’t disclose details but they were really shackled by what people expected from them in term of being royals versus what they wanted to produce.
    I think a lot of people wanted drama and they wanted high quality content that could sometimes be classified as “boring.“
    But this gives them the freedom to shop around.
    They had some really good ideas but executives will be executives.

    • sevenblue says:

      That is what happened with Spotify. I think, they got what they wanted from Netflix. They gave Netflix a big documentary on their life, Netflix gave them a few documentaries to produce which, they would know, wouldn’t have many watchers. As Ever with Meghan’s product line is gonna be main focus now, I assume.

  27. Honey says:

    Five years is a long time in streaming platform history. It’s quite possible that Netflix has shifted its business model from long-term contract-based projects to single-project based. I wouldn’t count either of them out of the running for future projects.

  28. Chantale says:

    It might a contract with just M. Who knows?

    • Julia says:

      Page Six is saying they are signing a deal similar to the Obamas new deal and more projects are coming. I know Page Six is a Murdoch tabloid but it does have some industry sources and what they are saying makes sense

  29. wordnerd says:

    I wish they’d done some sort of series as a pair. They have such cute chemistry, play off each other well, hence the amazing ratings of their documentary. Megan’s show was a lovely escape, it’s so soothing, but I’d love something more unscripted, where we see the behind-the-scenes of her running her business, making strategic decisions, booking podcast guests, maybe even reacting to her psychotic sister-in-law’s style copying like, “Say, Ambular….was that you going through my laundry?” Speaking of her style, I’d love her to do more posts on her pieces, I live for her sweaters (though my budget does not lol)

    • Jukia says:

      Page Six is saying we are going to get more shows from them it’s just that they won’t have the exclusive deal anymore. Similar to the Obamas.

    • jais says:

      I wanted a food/travel series. Where they go to cool spots in America. Meghan trying to find super spicy spots while Harry is begging for the spice to stay low. The security cost would be crazy. But not insurmountable. The bigger issue is that they have young kids so the travel aspect and the security…yeah, I get it. But I woulda watched the heck outta that.

    • Square2 says:

      @WORDNERD That would be like “The Real Housewives of” category. H&M would never do that. They may be approachable & down to earth, but they also guard their privacy fiercely. Meghan’s IG & some interviews were as close as people can get the behind-the-scence from H&M.

  30. Angelica Schuyler says:

    I’ll believe it when I hear it from the Sussexes. Netflix isn’t dropping WLM and As Ever anytime soon. That would be bad business. They have invested in her and she’s delivering. Maybe they will rework the contract differently, but they’re not cutting their association with H&M. They will probably still produce the movie they optioned from book rights, and if that goes well, they’ll expand in that vein in the future. But they didn’t invest all that time energy and money with Meghan to watch her go and take the success somewhere else to put money in someone else’s pocket.
    The British tabloids are going to spin this as negatively as they can, because that’s their aim and goal. But that doesn’t mean that what they say is the gospel truth. We know how much they lie.

    Like Maureen lying about Meghan’s wine being bad…. I finally received my shipment last night and we opened a bottle. It is GOOD. I’m just mad that I didn’t buy a whole case.

    So, since the Sun is the source for this article, I won’t believe it until it’s confirmed by Netflix or the Sussexes.

  31. MsKrisTalk says:

    I predict that their current contract expires and a new contract gets signed based on a change in the Sussex business structure. The BM will have egg on their faces once again and the leftovers will be pissed as usual.

  32. slippers4life says:

    Deal or no deal, they’re not going back to the UK so you can all stop stalling your ex royals!

  33. Libra says:

    Harry said it, believe nothing until you hear it from us.

  34. cabooklover says:

    The Obama’s deal wasn’t renewed either, it was turned into a first look option. I don’t see this as some big thing, just that Netflix’s business practices have evolved.

  35. Advisor2U says:

    Well, I don’t think that Harry and Meghan want a big production deal this time, because of all the new interests they have now. Meghan isn’t even talking about her being a Producer/Archewell Production Entrepreneur, lately.

    I thing a new Netflix production deal will indeed only be with Meghan reg. livestyle content, like, “With love, Meghan”. And she has a five to seven partnership deal with Netflix already with her business “As Ever”. That in it self is worth some tens, maybe hundred of millions, if we take into consideration that she will offering hospitality goods/merchandise in the future.

    And Harry is starting his own business too. Their spokesperson said that the announcement reg. this will happen in September. I’m guessing in the field of Mental Fitness/Health, Sports, or his own Investment/VC Business.

    But, out ot the old five year deal, they still have the “Meet me at the Lake” production coming up. Or is this one cancelled? There has been no updates from either parties (or the author), since last year September, at Netflix’s annual press content presentation.

    • Polo says:

      Books to movies take years to make. The it ends with us was almost a 5 yrs project from buying the rights to bringing it the screens…Same with Reese Witherspoon book adaptations.
      Again why is the standards for Meghan and Harry so outrageous when compared to other celebrities.
      Not saying you’re doing this specifically..

  36. MsIam says:

    Well if this is true, then I would think Deadline or Variety will have more/better info than People and certainly Page Six. I would wait and see what they say.

  37. Boo says:

    I’ll believe this when Meghan and Harry confirm it.

  38. L4Frimaire says:

    According to whom? This sounds like it’s hoping to get a response from the people directly involved but they don’t have to say anything at this time. It will come out eventually. As Meghan says, your urgency is not my urgency.

  39. L Williams says:

    I saw that article in People and I took a look at what is going on with the Obama’s Higher Ground Production Company. Netflix didn’t resign them either even though the Obama’s company has won Five major awards including a Oscar. My guess if this is true is that the streaming market is getting over saturated with film projects and streaming companies. For example free streaming from sites such as Roku which accounts for 14 percent of the U.S market is rising. Consumers are getting more discriminating on which streaming services that they pay for. As a result if this People Magazine article is true, the Sussexes have probably signed a deal with Netflix for first refusal. Which means they are paying to look at the Sussexes projects first and if they refuse to air certain projects the Sussexes have the option to negotiate with other streaming services. But like everything else until the word comes from a official Sussex spokesperson, I don’t believe stuff that originates with U.K tabloids.

    • sevenblue says:

      It is the same with other streamers. Phoebe Waller-Bridge didn’t even produce anything under her exclusivity contract. They also didn’t renew hers. It looks like the industry is dropping this kind of deals.

  40. maja says:

    There is a statement from Netflix on the subject. But it will get lost in all the noise, just as the truth often gets lost at the moment.

    • Kaz says:

      Is that statement from today or previous articles. I remember they made one weeks ago. I refuse to google anything Meghan right now because I have a feeling it’s better for my mental health.

  41. Bunny says:

    I would like to see the Sussexes pivot away from film projects and focus more on their individual endeavors. Meghan’s As Ever product line has been a tremendous success and Harry’s work on his philanthropic projects continues the legacy set by Princess Diana. I know this isn’t going to stop the negative press, but I think this path better align with their passions.

    • Kaz says:

      I’m confused isn’t that what they have been doing? Are you a recent follower?

    • Fandango says:

      Harry’s made many 10s of millions of dollars. He’s now an investor and has several paid gigs PLUS his charity work. He’s not relying on Meghan making money.

  42. MikeB says:

    It is hilarious watching the media, twisting themselves into pretzels trying to produce a story about H&M and Netflix. Even the Californian royal expert Kinsey Schofield is in the act, and the Daily Express is running a poll with the question “Should Netflix renew H&M’s contract” as if Netflix cares what the Express’s readers think.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment