Mail: King Charles should ban the Yorks from all private family events too

I’ll admit it: I find all of the royal/media hand-wringing about Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson to be tiring and performative. If King Charles wanted Andrew and Sarah to be completely absent from public view, he would make it happen. He has not. The royals and the media don’t actually care that Andrew was BFFs with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, nor do they actually care that Sarah took vast sums of money from Epstein and then apologized to Epstein for calling him a p3do. If the royals cared, they would have dealt with the Yorks a lot differently for the past decade. Instead, with each new or old revelation about Andrew and Sarah’s depravity, we just have to trudge our way through another cycle of “surely, the Windsors will finally do something about the Yorks!” And nothing ever happens. Well, the latest threat is that Fergie and Andrew might be “banned” from “family events.” No more family funerals or Christmases at Sandringham!

The King may be forced to ban the Yorks from private family occasions over their latest scandal involving convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Although Buckingham Palace has not issued any public comment, there was clear frustration in royal circles last night over new revelations involving the publication of gushing emails from Sarah, Duchess of York, to the shamed financier following his release from jail on child sex offences.

In the correspondence she issued a grovelling apology to Epstein for publicly disassociating herself from ‘her supreme friend’ when it emerged he had bailed her out financially, and claiming she had only done so to save her career as a children’s author.

The revelations once again shine an uncomfortable spotlight on the Yorks’ proximity to the Royal Family. While Sarah was ‘persona non-grata’ while Prince Philip was alive, Queen Elizabeth did allow her to accompany her family to estates such as Balmoral or Sandringham when he wasn’t around as a gesture of kindness towards her young granddaughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. The King further took pity on her when she was diagnosed with cancer, allowing her to join the family in Norfolk on Christmas Day, as well as Windsor Castle at Easter.

But that may now have to stop, sources say. In recent years the Duke and, now, his ex-wife, have even appeared with the Royal Family on their annual walk to church at Sandringham on Christmas Day, as well as Windsor Castle at Easter. And there was public shock this week when they both appeared front and centre alongside senior royals at Westminster Cathedral at the funeral of the Duchess of Kent.

One source has told the Daily Mail that the King has tried ‘every avenue available to him’ to ring-fence his brother. This includes cutting off all his private funding, withdrawing his security and trying to persuade him to downsize from Royal Lodge, his 30-room mansion at Windsor, by offering him alternative accommodation – such as Harry and Meghan’s former home, Frogmore Cottage. One clearly frustrated source said: ‘There is literally no more the king can do to cut off support [to the duke].’

Andrew has also continued to attended family gatherings ‘through the front door’, without any apparent concern for the ongoing embarrassment he is causing.

Last week it emerged that US investigators may have access to a damaging ‘cache’ of emails written by the duke to Epstein, that could prove even more ‘explosive’ than those pertaining to his ex-wife. Some insiders believe Charles will now have no option but to explore ways to prevent his brother attending family events in a private capacity too – or at least if does, do so in a less conspicuous manner, through the back door.

‘It is about the last sanction he may be able to take,’ a source said, pointing out that there is a ‘real fear’ there may be more of this to come.

[From The Daily Mail]

It’s the York situation where you can really see Charles’s dithering nature flourish. That man is incapable of making a decision and sticking to it. Obviously, Andrew and Fergie both should have been banned from everything, everywhere, forever. That should have happened years ago. It honestly looked much worse for the monarchy when QEII was still alive and bringing Andrew everywhere in an attempt to rehabilitate his image. But make no mistake, it still looks pretty bad that Charles can’t figure out a way to ban Andrew from polite society. They didn’t even mention that Charles still allows Andrew to host shooting parties on royal property!

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “Mail: King Charles should ban the Yorks from all private family events too”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Chaine says:

    I can call out Charles for a lot of things, but realistically can he ban other family members from inviting his brother to their own spouses’ funerals? I mean other than declaring that he will not show up to said family member funeral if Andrew is present, what can he do?

    • Dee(2) says:

      Yeah I was thinking the same. He can absolutely say he can’t come to Sandringham or Balmoral, those are his privately owned properties as the monarch. He can stop him from hosting shooting parties on the grounds as well. He can stop him from attending whatever order of xxxx event, or Ascot, or Trooping, or anything else that is royal family associated. However, he can’t tell the Duke of Kent that he can’t invite his cousin to his wife’s funeral. And if someone else in the family wants to invite Andrew or Fergie to events at their homes, he can’t tell them no either.

      • sunnyside up says:

        What does the fact that people are accepting those invitations from Andrew say about them.

      • DK says:

        I mean, he’s the King, he can set the tone.
        (Look how he did that with the Sussexes.)
        You can be sure that if QEII had given Andrew the cold shoulder, he wouldn’t be getting invites to any family events now.

        But instead she gave him her blessing and support (& money), which clearly implied everyone was to continue treating him like a cherished member of the family. And since Charles hasn’t been firm about anything, QEII’s blessing and continued support remains implied.

        In fact, it may well be that some family members feel obligated to include Andrew, *because* King Charles still allows him such leeway, and how can they be stricter about Andrew than KC without making KC look bad?

        But of course, I’m assuming they are all icked out by this pedophile in private/don’t want him at their events or anywhere near their kids and grandkids, etc.

        And that might be too big an assumption for a family full of cheating, pedophile-supporting scoundrels, so who knows?

  2. Neeve says:

    We all have that one family member that gives us the ick but its very hard to ban them from ‘family’ events. The only difference here is that there are photographers, controversialy I think its still his ‘right’ to spend time with his family.

  3. Tessa says:

    Charles won’t ban them. But Andrew and his ex front and center was a bit much. Fergie was grinning at those cameras.

  4. Blujfly says:

    Isn’t it William allowing Andrew to host shoots? Weren’t we told last week that one of the big responsibilities he’s been handed is control of the family shoots?

    • sunnyside up says:

      Good point, especially as I think that William was trying very hard not to laugh at Andrew’s joke.

  5. Libra says:

    A funeral is all about honoring the deceased. The feelings or feuds of the living take a back seat. If the funeral attendee is disruptive, that’s a different story and the funeral director and law enforcement can deal with it. But generally speaking, banning a person that is disliked by the living is depriving the deceased of being honored. To me, this is just civility and common sense.

  6. Lady Esther says:

    I do love the constant reminder from every “palace source” or “royal insider” that Charles yanked Andrews’ security. None of the RAVEC fig leaf for him that is used for Harry, and only for Harry! Charles can change royal family security whenever he wants, however he wants, the end.

    How strange that no British media ever pick up on this fact… 🙄

  7. Krista says:

    Andrew is certainly a POS, however private family events are private, and none of our business.

  8. bisynaptic says:

    Their fundamental problem is that the Yorks haven’t done anything the others haven’t done—they just got caught… and everyone knows it.