Mail: King Charles should give the Sussexes a royal property when they return!

This is one of the craziest Daily Mail exclusives, so it feels fitting that this will lead us into yet another weekend full of Paranoid Prince William’s unhinged briefings. You have to admit that the British media is really toying with William in particular. They enjoy having something to hold over his head, which is “the spectre of the Sussexes’ potential return to the UK.” Just so we’re clear, Harry has said many, many times that he has no plan to relocate back to the UK. He is happy in his California mansion with 894 bathrooms. But Harry really does plan to visit the UK, and those tentative plans to visit have led the Daily Mail to speculate about “where will the Sussexes LIVE when they’re in the UK.”

Prince Harry ‘would love’ to spend more time in the UK going forward and has told his delighted father it could even be every few months in 2026, it emerged today. But the Duke of Sussex insists that he will never move back to Britain because ‘he’s genuinely very happy in California’.

In response, King Charles is said to have been ‘absolutely clear’ that his youngest son cannot be a ‘half-in, half-out’ working royal – and Harry is said to swear blind that there is ‘no move’ being made ‘to be back in the institution’.

The monarch desperately wants a relationship with his youngest son – and especially his grandchildren Lilibet and Archie – with insiders claiming Charles may even be willing to offer the Sussexes their own pied-à-terre in Britain.

‘There are plenty of empty properties on the estate. The Royal Family is not exactly short of accommodation at the moment. But I don’t think being next door to William and Kate would go down too well’, a well-connected source told the Daily Mail.

Whether Meghan would come appears much less likely. And if she did, the duchess would probably prefer a place in the celeb-heavy Cotswolds as their UK base, away from royal eyes, it is said. An insider said of Meghan: ‘I’d say the Cotswolds would be somewhere they might look if they were thinking about a home outside the royal estate’.

Harry is said to swear blind that there is ‘no move’ being made by him ‘to be back in the institution’.

‘His wife and kids are there; his life is there’, a Sussex insider has claimed when asked about leaving Montecito.

Harry’s father will likely have told him that if he stays at a royal palace such Kensington Palace or Windsor Castle they will be automatically guarded by armed officers, including at Frogmore Cottage. If Charles formally invites the Sussexes to stay with him armed taxpayer-funded security will likely be reinstated from the moment they land because they would be his guests, multiple security sources have said. And Harry might be tempted to stay at a royal home as long as he manages to avoid his brother and sister-in-law, the source added.

‘Security is obviously still a big issue for the Sussexes. So stays within the occupied Royal Palaces estate would make sense because then they would be within the security perimeter’, they said. The Daily Mail’s source has claimed that Meghan would need a great deal of convincing. And she is known to love the Cotswolds having spent time there after moving to the UK when she became engaged to Harry.

[From The Daily Mail]

Wow, royal insiders already have the Sussexes moving back to the UK and staying on a royal estate. Or rather, they have Harry claiming a base on a royal estate while everyone agrees to send Meghan to the Cotswolds, naturally. Absolutely delusional. I will say this though… I found it interesting that for Harry’s visit to the UK a few weeks ago, there was no conversation (that I saw) of where he was staying. Did he stay in hotels, or did his father allow Harry and his security team to stay at a royal property? Anyway, no, none of this is happening. “Maintaining any kind of residence in the UK” was over for the Sussexes the moment Charles evicted them from Frogmore Cottage out of spite.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

return home

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

42 Responses to “Mail: King Charles should give the Sussexes a royal property when they return!”

  1. MSJ says:

    If Harry ever stays at a royal property, the anonymous staff would brief the press. Gossip is a business in the royal ecosystem. I think Harry is very cognizant of that and would want to guard his privacy and safety, as well as his wife’s and children’s privacy if he visits the UK with them.

    Rhetorical Question: Do they expect Harry and his family to visit the UK and remain sequestered on Royal grounds the entire time?

  2. Libra says:

    Frogmore. The royal property they rehabilitated at their own expense and then kicked out. They HAD a royal property.

    • jais says:

      Did they really just suggest Harry could possibly stay at Frogmore Cottage, the home he was evicted from?

      • Becks1 says:

        Yes, yes they did. I am dying over here. I want a job where I can just rant and rave and put whatever nonsense pops into my head out into the world because facts are meaningless.

        THEY NEED A ROYAL PROPERTY LIKE FROGMORE!!!!

        okay then….why was Frogmore taken from them???

      • bisynaptic says:

        Yes, yes, they did.

      • bisynaptic says:

        @Becks1: jinx!

    • JT says:

      It’s kind of funny how this article is throwing out what royals residence could that stay at when Frogmore Cottage is still sitting empty. I mean, it’s right there. Just give them back the home that they renovated and paid for at great expense. It’s that simple. Even if Harry comes to the UK quarterly, it would be reasonable and easier for him to stay at his former home.

    • MSJ says:

      Hilarious that they even mentioned Frogmore Cottage as an option considering the Sussexes were evicted by Charles and publicly ridiculed in the media after the palace gleefully briefed the press about the unceremonious eviction which the press coined “Frogxit”.

      Those people are not serious. They’re clowns 🤡 that publish clickbait fictional fantasies for money.

      I still wonder if Charles ever reimbursed the Sussexes the money they spent for Frogmore Cottage refurbishment and prepaid rents.

      • sunnyside up says:

        He should have done, he took the role of landlord when he threw them out and we all know that the landlord pays for renovations.

  3. SuOutdoors says:

    If the Daily Mail wants Harry back for several weeks a year (loads of content/clicks!!!) they should remind the King, there is a freshly renovated royal residence sitting empty for years… Not so far from Adelaide Cottage, but far away from Forest Lodge!

    • Julia says:

      Harry probably will be in the UK more next year because he has his Daily Mail court case and Invictus 1 year to go events. I doubt he will stay in royal property though. Stay away from those gossiping courtiers Harry.

    • I don’t even think that they want Harry back but what they do want is to keep digging at the lazy ones to get off their asses and get to work.

  4. TOM says:

    Imagine Harry’s California or UK? list. On one side of the paper he’s written: Meghan and kids boogie boarding, Montecito views and bathrooms, biking and hiking and surfing, oranges and lemons and avocados. In the other side: Ew, no.

  5. Nicki says:

    Yanking William’s chain. These people are nasty to their core. After years of playing nice with William, whose secrets they know and are clearly tired of keeping, they have gotten very little in return. Seems they’re ready for a bit of revenge.

  6. JENNIFER says:

    This is crazy. Why are the tabloids insistent that Harry would want to comeback? For what? To comeback and wear shoes with holes in them?
    This is the most unhinged thing. Also, if Charles cares so muvh about Archie and Lilibet, why isn’t he going to california to see them. Wouldn’t that be the logical thing, to see them in an environment that is familiar to them?

  7. jais says:

    Where is it coming from that Harry “is said to swear blind that there is ‘no move’ being made by him ‘to be back in the institution’.” They said Harry swore blind twice. What a weird phrase. Did he swear this to Charles in their tea and cake meeting? I mean I agree he doesn’t want to be back in bc he has said it aloud with his own words. Was that when he swore blind?

    • Julia says:

      I think they are taking it from the Telegraph article where it says something similar about sources close to Harry saying he is happy in the US. He has also said similar things on the record at different occasions.

    • Dee(2) says:

      I’ve heard swear down from my friend that lives in Sheffield a lot when she means I promise, so maybe this is the southern England version? And I guess it’s just their way of emphasizing that Harry means it no fooling, he doesn’t want to come back LOL. At least they are finally getting that point across given the fact that he said it about 17 times now.

  8. Truthiness says:

    They want the Sussexes in a local property so they can seize on every detail and exploit them daily with pics. A very private Californian home with security isn’t giving them access.

  9. Eurydice says:

    Either the DM is playing cat and mouse with William or they’ve joined him in his nervous breakdown. Whichever, it’s awfully entertaining.

  10. Hypocrisy says:

    Peggy’s blood pressure medication is going to be working overtime with articles like this 🤣.

  11. Lady Digby says:

    All this nonsense is to wind Will up for being standoffish and also click bait to enrage the haters. Next it will be the balcony and walkabouts etc., They want to rage bait Will into claiming his birth right by showing up regularly for duty. It is churnalism and nonsensical speculation to attract readers.

  12. lorent says:

    Interestingly, this is one of the first times I have seen the British press talk about Meghan coming to the UK and acknowledging that Harry and Meghan would come together, even if they speculate about having Harry in royal housing and Meghan in the Cotswolds.

  13. Dee(2) says:

    Wasn’t their first home in the Cotswolds? The one where the drone was trying to see into their bedroom? This article is just a bunch of rambling, using information that’s already public knowledge.

    Also, if they come more often who is to say that they just won’t purchase a townhouse in London or a penthouse somewhere? Why are the only options the country or on the Royal estate? They want them back on the Royal estate for gossip. And so that people can let them know when they are in town. Lots of interest in what irrelevant, exiled, broke, desperate, mocked, humiliated people are doing.

  14. Tessa says:

    So Peggs can raid the place and try to assault Harry and order him around. Why would Harry return to THAT?

  15. sunnyside up says:

    This piece implies that Harry wants to avoid William, but it is William who wants to avoid Harry. Has Harry himself ever said that he doesn’t want to see William?

  16. Maja says:

    They were already living in the Cotswolds and had to move away because the press were circling over their property all day long with helicopters and drones. I can’t think of anywhere in this country where Meghan, Archie and Lili would be safe.

    • Nerd says:

      Not only were they circling their home in the Cotswolds, they illegally published photos of that home and shared details that would put their lives at risk. They did the same thing with FC, Tyler Perry’s home and their home in Montecito. They show their racism and disregard to the safety of not just Meghan, but Harry and their children by how they have never done anything as malicious and cruel to any of the other royals. They can’t even lie and say it’s because of what they perceive as Harry and Meghan betraying the royal family because they started doing this before they had Archie and before they ever stepped down or gave an interview or wrote a book. Their racism has been showing for years.

  17. Nerd says:

    For all the times they try and say that it is the Sussexes that the RF has to worry about leaking to the press, this article and all of them since the meeting between Harry’s team and Charles’s team conveniently outside for the photographers, shows that it is always the left behind royals who leak about the Sussexes (truth and lies) to the media. We have heard every possible thing that these two meetings were about and it has always been to the Fail and other UK media that Harry and Meghan refuse to work with. An insider wouldn’t have to guess “whether Meghan would come” or guess that she “would prefer a place in the celeb-heavy Cotswolds” which in itself is one of the Fails usual insults of Meghan for being what they want her to be seen as a celeb and not the actual royal she is. They ignore the reality that Charles evicted his youngest son, DIL and grandchildren from the only safe home they had in the UK. The home that they were paying for and then ignored the fact that it was trashy tabloids who invaded their privacy by sharing details and photos of the home they initially tried to live in in the Cotswolds. Harry isn’t “said” to swear blind that there is no move. He has said with his full chest and without any hesitation, that they aren’t moving back. He has said this numerous times, including a week ago. There is no source because they can’t even tell the confirmed truth of anything regarding Harry and his Montecito family.

  18. Amy Bee says:

    They had a residence in the UK and Charles took it away. It’s unlikely they will stay in the Cotswolds because they used to rent a house there but they had to give up the lease when the Sun sent a helicopter to take photos of the house. These people are deluded.

  19. Snar says:

    It’s been curious to see what’s been released by Harry’s people since the PR folks met up a few months back- missing home, his father, next year being important

    We know it’s important to Harry to have his children visit England and he likely wants them to meet the King before he dies. Since loosing the court case over security, his only option is now his father. He also knows that once William is king, he and his children will not be safe to visit. I think he’s trying to get his children over before his father dies and to try to get his father to set up security for them to come for Invictus with full royal protection. They have been slow rolling the kids on socials and they are at the right age to be part of Harry’s Invictus world. It’s in his home country and time is running out.

    • Tessa says:

      Meghan needs to be part of the family not just him and his children visiting Charles. It’s disrespecting the wife of Harry and mother of Archie and Lili. Charles should end the nonsense and say Meghan is welcome and he wants her to be visiting him with her family which are Harry, Archie and Lili. If he shows up bringing the children to see Grandfather, I would be appalled. Meghan needs to be a part of the world of Invictus too and Charles needs to be civil to her and not tell Harry to keep her away. Didn’t Charles make Camilla non-negotiable? He should see Meghan as non-negotiable and welcome to come.

      • Snarkle says:

        When I was talking above about Harry wanting to bring the kids, my assumption was with Meghan too. I didn’t mean to leave her out and don’t think he’d ever bring the kids to England without her, especially for Invictus.

        That said, it’s not what I’d want for them. I hope they don’t go. It just seems like he might have a plan that he is working towards with the comments that seem to come from his people related to his father, the security case loss and his kids

  20. Over it says:

    I know these people like to act like Meghan doesn’t exist. Like she isn’t Archie and lily mom and Harry wife but wtaf. Charles wants to see Harry and Archie and lily but no mention of Meghan. Yes I know he made his views about Meghan perfectly clear when the queen died and she was not welcomed at balmoral. I get it . He hates her but guess what. Those children people claim he wants to see, he does not . Let’s be clear about that. Those children he claims he wants to see, have a mother. Her name is Meghan and if you want to see her children, then you better show her some f-ing respect.
    I know this is not my place because it isn’t my family but when I think about how Charles kicked them out of the house they were gifted and paid to renovate all out of spite, took away their security therefore leaving them and their son at the time and now lily too in danger in the uk and how Saint Tyler had to literally save their lives and now Harry wants to put the focus in the year/years on his dad, I can’t . I really can’t . Again it’s not my family, Harry obviously is a better and bigger person than me because chuck would have been dead to me if he did a quarter of the things he did to Harry to me . But hey , what do I know. I am just an outsider looking in .

    • Tessa says:

      Harry should make Meghan non-negotiable. and not bring the children unless Meghan is there with them. The writers keep leaving her out.

  21. Sparky says:

    Harry cannot (should not??) move back to the UK regardless of what Charles may promise. There is ZERO expectation that when William King he will continue on with any of these agreements.

    And FTR, I’ve lived both in London and SoCal and I’d pretty much prefer Santa Barbara for long term living. (My parents retired in Montecito. My brother got a stern “talking to” from my dad after stating his plan to bring up his drone on his next visit to Santa Barbara and perhaps spy on some of my dad’s more famous neighbors!!)

  22. Grace Yancy says:

    IT AIN’T HAPPENING!
    WAKE UP FROM YOUR DELUSION!
    HELL TO THE NAW!
    SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
    GET REAL!
    WHEN PIGS FLY!
    WHAT’S THE NAME OF YOUR DREAM?
    OH, HELL NO!

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment