Rielle Hunter finds her GQ photos “repulsive” – most people agree

gqrielle

Hey, remember this morning, when I put up some excerpts and photos from Rielle Hunter’s big profile and interview in GQ Magazine? Well, it looks like Rielle is not happy with the way she’s come across. What’s that? Oh, of course not, she’s not worried about sounding like a batsh-t insane John Edwards stalker who is hellbent on demonizing his dying wife. No, Rielle is upset with the photos! You know, the photos she posed for, willingly. According to Barbara Walters, she and Rielle spoke on the phone this morning, and Rielle found the photos “repulsive”. Because some aging bleached-blonde wh-re was in the photos, maybe? I have no idea:

Rielle Hunter isn’t pleased with her GQ spread.

On The View Monday, Barbara Walters said that she spoke to Hunter, 45, who “was in tears” over the shots.

After seeing the pictures, she “screamed for two hours,” Walters said, according to USA Today. “She said she found the photographs repulsive.”

In one photo, Hunter has her tummy exposed as she lays with Frances Quinn, her 2-year-old daughter with former Democratic presidential candidate. John Edwards.

When Walters asked Hunter why she posed for the shots in the first place, “she said she trusted Mark Seliger, whom she said is a brilliant photographer and quote, ‘I went with the flow.'”

Walters said Hunter “thought that having one of those photos was okay and would be sexy and that there were others that were just beautiful headshots, but that GQ picked photos to hit one note.”

[From Us Weekly]

Well, I think the one on her daughter’s bed just sends out the “creepy” vibe. The one with Rielle just about to flash her vadge just seems appropriate, considering the woman is famous for flashing her vadge to a married man. Now, what disturbed me about the one of Rielle and Quinn… it feels like Rielle is trying to half-way hide Quinn’s face. But it’s not a “I have to protect my child” pose, it’s a “this kid is blocking my light” pose. Right?

Beyond that… yeah, Rielle is a f-cking idiot. She’s just whining about the photos now because she thought that when they came out, everyone would be like, “Oh, she’s such a hot bitch.” And people’s real reactions were like, “Oh dear God, this woman is a freak.”

Oh, did anyone want to know anything else about the sex tapes?

rielle3

rielle2

GQ photos of Rielle courtesy of the Washington Post and GQ online.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

57 Responses to “Rielle Hunter finds her GQ photos “repulsive” – most people agree”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. happymom says:

    Oh for god’s sake-you’re posing like this and then later you don’t like how you appear? How does it happen without your consent that you’re lolling about your child’s bed in a shirt while a professional photographer snaps shots? Ewwww. Just ewwwww.

  2. truthSF says:

    Ewww, I see underwear in the top pic!! And yes girl, you look repulive!! But I do feel bad for her innocent child caught up in this mess!

    @ happymom, the fact that she flashing her vajajay area on her daughter’s bed is one of the most creepiest and dumpest thing i’ve ever seen.

  3. princess pea says:

    Bwahahahaha!

  4. Cinderella says:

    Sorry Rielle. Guess the stars weren’t in alignment during your photoshoot.

    That poor kid. That’s all I can say.

  5. Mairead says:

    I’ve no particular axe to grind with her as I’m not particularly fussed about politicans affairs – so long as it’s not like the Profumno Affair or something, or their paramours weren’t getting government favours in return.

    BUT:
    I love how her stare is as vacant as Dora’s. And especially how terrified the stuffed pink owl/cat looks. Sorry mate, Kermit won’t save you now! 😆

    And dear God they are appalling photos in every way shape and form! Having said that, far less flattering photos of me have been published in our local rag and i didn’t scream solidly for two hours. Get over yourself woman! 🙄

  6. TaylorB says:

    When she saw the pics “she screamed for two hours”… you and me both honey.

  7. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    I am glad she realizes how disgusting this photoshoot was. I mean come on posing on a bed in a man’s shirt with no pants…what message did she think that would send. Oh and that one her daughters bed, just plain gross.

    Also why the hell did she think posing for pictures in a bedroom when she is in the middle of scandalous affair was a good idea in the first place?

  8. sonola trip says:

    truthSF: Yep, you’re right. You can easily see Rielle’s underwear in the top photo. They’re white with polka dots. I guess we should at least be thankful she’s wearing underwear. Small mercies.

  9. bellaluna says:

    Yeah, that whole “I boffed a married man so let’s do the pix on a bed with me dressed in men’s shirt” thing didn’t work out too well for you, did it? The only worse idea I can think of is her dressed as a slutty nurse treating cancer patients in treatment center or hospice. Way to show your lack of class, dumbass.

  10. Constance says:

    Can someone do the lolz text on these and submit them to failblog? I mean seriously lady, what were you thinking?

    Megan Fox Crazy/Sultry and innocent adoring mother? Google Katie Price and do everything she DOESN’T, not does.

    Honey, you got the mantra all wrong.

    It’s : A lady in the streets and a freak in (NOT your daughter’s) sheets.

    Can you be too cheap to employ someone to help you learn to Googlefu harder?

  11. YT says:

    Did she have a brain freeze while posing for these very inappropriate photos? She cannot now say they are repulsive since she willing posed for them in those “outfits”.

    Fools should learn to keep their mouths shut rather than proving they are fools. Great move to do a magazine interview. Ha!

    So, Rielle and Barbara Walters are telephone buddies? Good for them. *rotflmao*

  12. Annabelle says:

    All she cares about is her appearance to go with her fake name. Vain vain vain

  13. Constance says:

    I bet she called WahWah. However my gut says The View called her for comment because they only had Jessica to talk to. One bottle blonde is only half a relevant topic?

  14. snapdragon says:

    those photos are the best laugh i’ve had all day.

  15. Sumodo1 says:

    I don’t care about Rielle Hunter, John and Elizabeth Edwards, or the couple who had the videotape. It’s tawdry and speaks poorly about the quality of leadership in American politics.

  16. bellaluna says:

    Maybe I’m wrong, but I kinda think she looks like a blonde Dina Lohan. Maybe a less tan, blonde Dina Lohan. You can smell the desperation wafting off the page (or screen, whatever).

  17. meme says:

    and to think she could have been first mistress. i loathe all the people involved in this sordid affair and pity the poor little girl.

  18. Wow says:

    So she finds her photos repulsive but not her whole interview… Hmmm.

    I’m pretty sure she’s still boinking the old dude, but why brag about this Polly-Anna “love” you two have for each other while his dying wife is still alive? People who brag in situations like this never look good (no pun intended).

  19. GatsbyGal says:

    God those pictures just look sloppy. It’s like they did it on purpose, which amuses me to no end.

  20. Uzi says:

    Rielle isn’t exactly supermodel material, and these shots by a top photographer make her look much more attractive than she is in real life. It’s the sleaziness of the poses and the woman’s character that are “repulsive.”

  21. boo says:

    WTF? She is officially on my top five scumbag list.

  22. cc says:

    seriously gross.
    and they photoshopped her belly to death. at least they airbrushed her stretchmarks out to her liking, though her bellybutton looks like it was painted on. lol!

  23. lucy2 says:

    “Also why the hell did she think posing for pictures in a bedroom when she is in the middle of scandalous affair was a good idea in the first place?”

    I know! If you want to change your reputation as a ho, the first thing you should insist on is not posing on a bed, and the second thing is wearing pants!!! That’s like trying to convince people you’re not a criminal and then posing in a jail cell.

  24. Johanna says:

    She screamed for two hours because she didn’t like the pictures she willingly posed for? Geez, imagine if her husband had had an affair & impregnated the mistress… How long would she scream then?

  25. audrey says:

    No excuses – these shoots are DIGITAL! All images are seen instantly.. most on a big ass Mac screen as they are shot.. Unless the editors really did a number on her and picked the worst, most embarrassing and awkward ones (which I don’t doubt) she knew what the vibe was. I doubt she thought these were “headshots”..

    Some women can try to make sexy expressions. Not all actually look sexy doing it.

  26. guilty pleasures says:

    @ Contance, hahahaha! you are officially my internets friend!!

    It’s : A lady in the streets and a freak in (NOT your daughter’s) sheets.

    I commented earlier when we didn’t know babwa had weighed in….I said that the pics were disgusting, the photographer terrible, the subject unattractive inside and out.
    Babs needs to choose her causes/friends more judiciously.

  27. katie says:

    i wonder if she only is appalled with the pics bc she received such negative feedback?

  28. Chris says:

    She kind of reminds me of Courtney Love

  29. Melanie says:

    They are now recalling this cover, go out and get it, it is bound to be collectors!

  30. Green Is Good says:

    This woman is nuts. What, she’s pissed off because these photos make her look cheap and slutty? DUH.

  31. Melanie says:

    You KNOW Elizabeth Edwards is laughing her azz off right now.

  32. lola lola says:

    Oh boo hoo. If she was worried about her photos she should have put on some damn pants. WACKO!!

  33. winnie says:

    Why would she think it would be sexy to be lying on her daughter’s bed? Next to Dora and Kermit?!! that is so gross..

  34. Victoria says:

    She wants to be a sexpot.

    She was in her late 30s and wanted a baby and a wealthy man.

    Edwards was a fool. She looks really old.

  35. Belle Epoch says:

    I love how the stuffed animals are all screaming – well, except Dora, who has more clothes on than “Rielle.”

    Just had to put her made-up name in quotes.

  36. Constance says:

    @guilty pleasures Friendship accepted!

    I just don’t buy that Barbara is on a personal mobile contacts relationship with this nobody. I mean political scandal is a dime a dozen in recent years.

    AND, if I am wrong and WahWah is butt buddy with this trash… Good thing she’s retiring from interviewing her “friends.”

  37. Mistral says:

    This woman is insane and disgusting. I feel so sorry for that child. What chance does she have at normal when her mom is a crazy fame whore? Same thing for Jude Law’s new baby, or the kids of that stripper broad who supposedly banged Fergie’s husband. These women are nasty and I hate that they make money for their trashy behaviour–especially when that money is in the form of child support payments for some unwanted one-night-stand/affair baby. These, and Tiger Woods’ hoes, need to sit their asses down, and out of sight.

  38. BReed says:

    There’s a name for women like her: TRASH.

  39. Goten says:

    In the words of Fred Sanford: You big dummy.

    Nuff said.

  40. daisy424 says:

    Why does she look different?
    Did she have some work done on her face?

  41. Judy says:

    I’m not condoning or supporting Rielle Hunter in any way, but are some of you people real–calling her “aging” and “looking old” at 45? 45 is YOUNG. What are you people–in your 20’s? If so, you haven’t even lived yet. And she is very attractive and does not look old. And I am NOT a Rielle Hunter or a John Edwards’ fan–especially not a fan of that SCUM John Edwards. Demi Moore is OLDER than Rielle Hunter–would you call her old? Nah, I didn’t think so.

  42. Judy says:

    P.S. to Constance: You obviously did not watch The View this morning, because Barbara Walters talked about having a conversation with Rielle and that Rielle was totally upset with the outcome of the pics. Again, not in Rielle’s court–just wish people would be more informed before they post.

  43. ThunderC*nt says:

    Rielle (real name Lisa Druck) is connected with that author Jay McInereny who used her as his main character in some books. He also is the one responsible for Chloe Sevigny’s fame. He is a user and a gold digger. He’s now with one of the Hearst socialites, sister of Patty Hearst.

    Lisa Druck really got around and is a want to be actress who never cut it in the industry.

    Lisa’s dad killed her horse by eletrocuting him and she never got over it. He killed lots of horses for $$$.

  44. But she IS repulsive. It would have been hard to make her look otherwise. Haha

  45. Rosanna says:

    Because in case nobody has figured it out yet they have fallen in love! Like it or not!

  46. guilty pleasures says:

    Lisa Druck??? lol, almost as bad as Jamie Grubbs!
    (no offense to all of you Drucks and Grubbs out there…)

    And the pics don’t get any better with revisitation. Still a complete maroon!

    @ Constance, lunch?

  47. bubbles says:

    @Victoria
    she was in her late thirties and wanted a baby?
    she is 45 now and I believe it says her daughter is a little over two. Mathmajor much?
    I can’t believe GQ actually put their logo on these pictures. I can just hear the photographer going” oh yes, baby, give it to me. Georguos honey, move a little bit closer to Dora and the Unicorn. Oh, yes, guys are going to go apeshit over this.” hahahahahahahahah!

  48. Blythe says:

    that poor little girl! What kind of future will she have with parents like this? I do hope John’s older children will take care of this little girl down the line, because she’s going to need some help.

  49. lunachick says:

    Gatsby – agree totally. It looks like the photographer was looking up toward her face, from her bum area. Serves her right, IMHO. Thunder…interesting, explains a lot about this woman’s ongoing psychological issues…

  50. westender says:

    The eyes on the stuffed toy between Dora and Kermit pretty well sum up how many viewers must feel about the photos and this woman! I will never understand people.

  51. LOL says:

    Is she for real??? She screamed for two hours? Guess that blows her “Zen” attitude about wanting whatever life brings to her. How about wanting what you create? Wonder how long she’d scream if she were standing in Elizabeth’s shoes experiencing (John and Rielle’s creation) all she has been through? As far as I’m concerned these photos tell the rest of the story that Rielle Hunter attempted to whitewash with her crazy-a**, “intuition, never before feelings and eternal love”!!! I love that her real name is Lisa Druck but what….her dear “Johnny” didn’t know that? True love?

  52. Tru says:

    no underwear on your child’s bed??

    maybe she had them on, I was thinking she’d leave a snail trail..

    let me be good and stop it.
    sorry

  53. Boo says:

    Let’s do a sexy photo shoot….yeah, make up my hair all messy and play up the makeup….why don’t I wear a man’s shirt and only a man’s shirt? That’s sexy. Now, where to do the shoot….Oh! I know! My toddler’s bed! That won’t be disgusting/perverted/misinterpreted/come back to haunt my child for years and years….

  54. Cathleen says:

    She’s either really stupid or really naive. 1) She dosen’t know that it’s distasteful to sedutively pose on her child’s bed with their toys? 2) She dosen’t know that middle-aged men who want some action with a younger woman regularly use the feel sorry for me/I have a “mean” wife story. Please, smarten up.

  55. coucou says:

    Rielle may be stupid, but GQ is stupid, too. Whoever the dumbshit is that works for GQ and came up with this lame-ass idea did so clearly to just fan the waning flames of controversy and sell-out cuz the tabloids are unfortunately out-selling them. I have absolutely no respect for the photographer who knew what he/she was doing, allowing a child to be implicated in such a way. Disgusting creep sell-out. Damn, is it just me, or is this world just getting sicker and sicker…?

    And Rielle…FFS? WTF were you thinking? It wasn’t like you had it already bad enough? This is not interesting, it’s not attractive, and it just lost you whatever minority of the sympathy vote you might have had, ya know? Had i been in your place, i would have said to the photographer, “uh, gee, ah, i don’t think this is a good idea,” and then i’d throw my pants on and get in the kitchen or playground, you know, baking cookies for baby, or pushing her in a swing, you know, NORMAL stuff???

    Man you people SUCK. I am so over it!

  56. emmajulie says:

    it IS funny that she could have in any way thought these pics would be taken well by the public. that’s why my sister (who almost has her PhD in psychology) said that after rielle’s years of living more like an animal (no job/no real home/no plan), she is totally schizophrenic. and you can tell. she constantly contradicts herself and tries to sound logical when she just cannot think logically anymore. once you live as a grifter which she has always done, your mind becomes scattered. her life of “truth” is wrapped up in this photo shoot. total BS. her poor daughter!! that little girl is truly the victim here and then elizabeth edwards. holy hell. this rielle woman is a true sociopath. good luck john. you’re going to need it.

  57. devin says:

    genius photographer-hes totally making fun of her & she didnt even know cuz shes so full of herself LOL