Palace insiders: The Sussexes are ‘so tacky’ for attending Kris Jenner’s party

Kris Jenner did several photo dumps from her 70th birthday party, which looked like a really fun night. Ostentatious? Sure. But rich celebrities are going to throw parties, and it’s not like any of it came from American taxpayers. Speaking of, all of the hand-wringing over the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s attendance at Kris Jenner’s party is leaving me cold. Meghan and Harry are friendly with the K-J clan and we’ve seen that for years. Kris’s party was full of A-listers like Oprah, Tyler Perry, Mariah Carey, Beyonce and Jay-Z, all of whom are also friendly with Harry and Meghan. The Sussexes had every reason to be invited, and every reason to attend. Their attendance did a lot to blow up the British media’s narratives about “no one in LA likes the Sussexes” and “A-listers snub the Sussexes,” narratives which were just being circulated anew LAST WEEK. Now we’re getting a return to another huffy narrative, straight from Prince William and Kensington Palace: Harry and Meghan are “tacky” for attending a party with A-listers and billionaires. William would never!

Palace insiders are appalled by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s grinning appearance at Kris Jenner’s 70th birthday bash — and say it shows just why the couple should not be accepted back in the royal fold.

“It’s so tacky,” said one palace insider who works with the royal family.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex dressed up in black tie and joined a bevy of Hollywood stars at Jenner’s party, thrown by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos and wife Lauren Sánchez at their $165 million Beverly Hills estate Saturday night. They were joined by celebs including Beyoncé and Jay Z, Martha Stewart, Mariah Carey, Oprah Winfrey, Paris Hilton, Adele, all the Kardashians — and Jenner’s plastic surgeon, Dr Steven Levine, who is responsible for her astonishing facelift.

“It truly shows that Harry is so far removed from the rest of the family. These people may be stars in America, but the pure ostentatiousness is at odds with what Prince William is trying to do with his life and the monarchy,” the insider said.

Their appearance also shows just how entrenched the Sussexes are within Hollywood, as Bezos’s company is making Markle’s upcoming movie, “Close Personal Friends.” She will play herself in the romantic comedy and landed the cameo as she has a “connection” with the filmmakers, sources said. The movie is being made by Amazon MGM, which is owned by Bezos, and produced by Isaac Aptaker and Elizabeth Berger. Markle filmed her cameo last week, but we are told it doesn’t mean the former “Suits” star is making a real return to acting.

“That’s overstating things,” said an industry source.

Despite the couple having gone Hollywood, the insider admitted that some palace officials think Harry and Markle should be brought back to the royal family to help when Harry’s estranged brother, Prince William, eventually takes the throne.

However, the insider said, “William has made it clear that he has a plan for being king, and he has true class. I think he will look at the younger royals to help, including Prince Edward’s children.”

[From Page Six]

How dare the Sussexes attend an A-list party and successfully network and enjoy themselves among friends! That’s not the classy royal way! The classy royal way is to pay settlements to your rape victim! The classy royal way is paying celebrities like Kylie Minogue and David Beckham to fly on private jets around the world for your vanity environmental bullsh-t! The classy royal way is to beg British celebrities to perform at your coronation, but all of them refused so you had to hire two American artists AND make an appearance on American Idol! They’re not mad that the Sussexes are “tacky,” they’re mad that Harry and Meghan are rolling with the biggest celebrities in the world, full stop.

Photos courtesy of Kris Jenner’s Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

159 Responses to “Palace insiders: The Sussexes are ‘so tacky’ for attending Kris Jenner’s party”

  1. Tessa says:

    Calling scooter classy is a bad joke considering his spiteful nature and jealousy. He is thirsty to have celebrities around him and would have gone to a celebrity party if invited. And in a heartbeat.

    • 2131JAN says:

      He’s the same person who was literally *giddy* with joy showing Tiny Tim Cruise his big boy, velvet airplane slippers! The internet is forever, Bully Boy!

  2. Dee(2) says:

    “These people may be stars in America, but the pure ostentatiousness is at odds with what Prince William is trying to do with his life and the monarchy,” This man just moved into his fifth home and his father has a solid gold carriage. Stop.

    This is just jealousy. Nothing more complex than that. They wouldn’t release stories about how no one in Hollywood likes them, and how Harry and Meghan wish they were considered A List, if they thought attending parties like this was beneath them.

    What I really want to know, is what do the remaining Windsors think that their reputation is in Hollywood? Because a lot of those British celebs live in LA most of the time. Do they think constantly denigrating actors, denigrating Hollywood, saying I have class so I wouldn’t hang around with those people endears them? Then also how if Harry and Meghan are within 10 ft of anyone they start to attack them too? Not really a long-term plan if you want to attract attention and celebrity endorsements to your own gatherings.

    • Jais says:

      That man has just moved into his fifth home. Right??? There is nothing about FL and land grabbing 150 acres of public park land for your 5th home that is not ostentatious. Omfg.

      • StarWonderful says:

        Truly! The RF is all about ostentation and concocted superiority! In addition, I don’t see H&M absconding with bags of money from shady characters.

      • BeanieBean says:

        And furnishing it with antiques from the Royal Collection. They have so much stuff they stole from all over the world that it’s stored in warehouses.

    • GMHQ says:

      Americans basically see the British monarchy as a bunch of pedo enablers. And Scooter’s assertion that he would never attend such an event… at least he got that right because Hollywood would never invite a bald wet blanket to attend.

      • Mightymolly says:

        TBF, if Scooter were hanging out in Hollywood he would get invited because of who he is. But would be really awkward because no one would consider him the most important person in the room and it would be like he was in black and white while the world around him was in color.

    • Guessing says:

      So.. out of all the people who attended Kris Jenner birthday party, who will Will try to get to attend his Earthshot Prize or something else? Who will that family try to get close to?
      You know it’s coming

  3. The louder they shout the more ridiculous they sound, people don’t belive them. Those who do are haters that give them clicks to keep them fed.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    Is it that the Palace insiders really believed what the British press wrote about Harry and Meghan? Plus weren’t the same people already calling Harry and Meghan tacky for doing the docuseries? Harry and Meghan going to this party has these people scrambling for a new narrative.

    • Jais says:

      I do think they might really believe the press. That’s why the emotional support polls are so important and why they self-soothe by reading about what flops the Sussexes are and that nobody likes them.

      • Becks1 says:

        When the press writes articles about how unpopular H&M are, its for a very small audience – W&K and to a large extent C&C – but mostly W&K. So yeah I can believe this has caught them off guard.

      • Tina says:

        I do think they believe it. That’s why they crash out when their narrative is challenged in the real world.

      • TigerMcQueen says:

        They do believe it.

        They also really did believe H&M would fail when they became “non working” members of the RF, that they would be broke, that everyone would hate them, and that Harry would divorce Meghan and leave her and his kids behind as he limped back to the firm with his tail between his legs.

        When that didn’t happen, the palace insiders told themselves H&M were only making money because they were selling their connection to the RF (through the Oprah interview, the Netflix series, and Spare) and ignored any evidence to the contrary. They believed once that money was gone, H&M would be broke, everyone would hate them, and Harry would ditch his family and return.

        When that didn’t happen, well now the insiders don’t know what to do because they keep ignoring reality. Thus the mini extinction burst anytime something H&M does goes against the “they’re broke, everyone hates them” narrative.

  5. Smatone99 says:

    The royals can’t even get a list celebs.. Remember the list of rejections for tampons big hat party? Scooter pays b and c to go to his thing. They were so upset about H and M at a flipping party they paid hundreds of trolls to swarm here and other places about OMG! USED TO LOVE THEM BUT I’M SO DISAPPOINTED as if any of that bullshit was real not a paid swarm. Lol. Grow the fuck up willy.. Do the job us fucking tax payers are paying for. Stop this absolute idiocy and one sided bizarre competition. I loathe paying for your booze and Kate wigs but while stuck with you, I’ll call you and your lazy staff out

    • Harla says:

      @Smatone99, thank you for bringing up the commentary from yesterday, I found it so bizarre but trolls/bots/swarms never occurred to me, now it makes much more sense.

      • bisynaptic says:

        The commentary was not all bots. Many (including me) are longtime celebitchy posters.

      • TigerMcQueen says:

        There were plenty of long time posters who were a part of the “disappointed” commentary yesterday. H&M are not above criticism, even from people who usually support them. Just saying.

      • bluhare says:

        Thanks you two above me. I was late to the party yesterday, but I too wasn’t crazy about it even though I like them both.

    • WaterDragon says:

      Thanks for confirming my gut feeling that yesterday’s tantrum swarm about “OMG! USED TO LOVE THEM BUT I’M SO DISAPPOINTED” was mostly due to palace paid trolls. The Rota Rats and rest of the UK Media have been so wrong about Meghan and Harry about EVERYTHING for SO LONG that I don’t know how they even have the energy to get up in the morning to continue to churn out their drivel. I especially enjoyed the photos showing Harry smiling and having a wonderful time. He certainly does not look like an unwilling hostage who is pining to return to Royal servitude as Bully’s scapegoat.

      • Betsy says:

        I was happy to be informed my Trumper friends are LITERAL NAZIS. And that my clapback was deleted. Really makes me want to participate.

    • Nic919 says:

      That post was shut because the traffic going to it was not natural. People can disagree about H and M on things and often do but those posts don’t get shut down. We can’t forget that KP has bots out there and they look to diminish H and M at every turn.

      And to even bring up tacky when they were canoodling with orange man and his contract wife is just hilarious.

      • Happy Peregrine says:

        I went back to that post to see if others had responded to my comment and I couldn’t believe the first time commenters all saying that this ruined H&M and they were so disappointed. My comment defending them wasn’t even there anymore so I don’t know what happened.

        But yes. The bots were out in force. What on Earthshot was that insanity all about? They will try anything to tarnish the Sussexes.

        Guess what? Life is complicated and messy and our world is broken. And the Sussexes do immense good for so many and are always trying to do more.

        And holy hek does Kris look amazing at 70. Say what you want about the work she’s had done. She’s not into aging naturally and that’s fine. She looks how she wants to look and I’m deeply impressed with her drs work.

      • jais says:

        Look, there are regular commenters here who are not a fan of Harry and Meghan being at the Bezos house and I get that. I’m not a fan of Bezos. So I don’t discount that feeling even if I wasn’t as bothered. The bigger issue I have is commenters I’ve never seen before swearing that they comment on this site all the time in support of Meghan but now they’re sooo disappointed. Cuz then I’m like huh, who u? Those types of things feel manufactured and suspect for sure. There’s often new commenters and they come in with a genuine vibe. This was not that. So if your comment was deleted it was probably bc it was part of a thread that started with someone commenting in bad faith. Eventually, it just gets easier to shut down the post.

    • MY3CENTS says:

      Weren’t WanK booed a couple years ago at some film industry award/event ?
      Yeah that’s gotta hurt when you have to pay for big names to attend any of your events (and even then no).

  6. Nikki (Toronto) says:

    William wishes he had access to these A-list celebs (I hope he realizes David Beckham doesn’t have to show up anymore).

    Also, if they plan to involve Sophie and Edward’s kids, God help the monarchy. The girl rides a horse and buggy, for goodness’ sake. How is that relatable to the average Brit? It’s as if the RF don’t realize that their base is dying of old age. They need Kate to get a stylist (fashion, hair and make-up) and bring some much-needed glamour into that household.

    • Tessa says:

      Kate has no real glamour. Her behavior to Meghan is nothing to write home about

      • Nikki (Toronto) says:

        @Tessa Kate’s all they have; may as well make the best of it.

        She can’t compete with Meghan on fashion. She needs to create a vision board featuring Lydia Millen Gordon and copy her casual and red-carpet style: Oscar de la Renta, Holland Cooper, Ralph Lauren, Fairfax & Favor, and Sassi London. I think Lydia does a great job co-playing Kate Middleton. Kate needs to style stalk her, like she did Meghan.

      • Tessa says:

        The royal family mostly is not known for glamour. When she was young. Princess Margaret was glamorous and later princess diana. Keen is no princess diana or princess margaret. And she is not good looking when she glares at Meghan. Keen is pretty but rather plain looking. It might be that future married ins will bring on the glamour
        Peter Phillips girlfriend does have glamour

    • Duch says:

      Yeah plans involving the DOE kids — that came from left field. Like where did that come from!

      • Tina says:

        Nothing against Louise and James but yah no that isn’t going to work. Poor James looks like he would rather be anywhere else on the rare occasion he is forced to attend anything.

      • Nikki (Toronto) says:

        They’ve been trying to make Lady Louise happen all summer, and no one cares. She looks like the late queen (and her dad), but that only appeals to the older segment of the population.

    • sunnyside up says:

      Louise gives the impression that she isn’t interested. Wise girl.

      • tamsin says:

        I remember when Louise first “came out” to royal events as smiling hand waver. She looked happy and enthusiastic. I fear, judging from latest photos, the Windsors has beaten all that youthful enthusiasm out of the poor girl. She probably could have been an excellent representative of the Windsors in the style and spirit of her granny and the queen mother.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Willy would never.. be invited in the first place. So he can scream to the rota all he wants. This is pure jealousy coming from KP.

      • BeanieBean says:

        He can’t even show up to BAFTA events at his own house!! This is not his kind of thing, socializing. He just wants to stay home watching football on the telly, drinking a case of beer, and maybe playing video games during commercials.

    • Dee(2) says:

      The way they keep mentioning these people as having to ” step up” is so disturbing to me. They act like she has no hopes and dreams for herself in her life. If the family business is short of staff because the person in charge has chased everyone away, that’s too bad for them. It’s like they don’t even consider the fact that James and Louise may want to do other things with their life, and if they do who cares. Neither of them come to a bunch of Royal events, I can’t even remember the last one James came to, so I don’t understand why they behave as if they are a reasonable option.

      • Nikki (Toronto) says:

        @Dee(2) I think it’s because everyone has said no. You’re supposed to sacrifice your hopes and dreams to support the crown, and your payment is below market rent on a grand property and enough money for fancy dresses and staff.

        That recent article in the DM attacking Beatrice and Eugenie noted that they both live on Crown land and that Charles would be charging them market rent “soon”. I saw that as a threat (along with taking away their titles). Beatrice has figured out how to capitalize on the RF title without the day-to-day drama. I think the treatment of H&M has scared off everyone. No one wants the job, hence the need to “step up”.

  7. Tessa says:

    How about when scoot went to premieres wearing those airplane slippers to impress tom cruise. And he and keen went to the bond premiere with keen in the gaudy outfit

    • HuffnPuff says:

      We keep seeing these articles because Harry is living the life Scooter wishes he had. Scooter wants all the largesse that comes with being royalty with none of the “work” part. He wants the private transportation, the fancy houses, the money, the numerous luxury vacations and the titles. In addition, he wants to hobknob with Hollywood royalty. Nevermind that going to parties with famous people is part of the Sussexes job. You don’t get TV deals or interest in your charities by holing up in an estate.

  8. Duch says:

    “Wm has true class” says the insider instructed by Wm to talk to press. Yeah, true class that.

  9. Julia says:

    The British Royals are one of the tackiest families in the UK. Didn’t William accept loads of money from Bezos for Earthshot but now he’s tacky? I know what’s tacky demanding your 5th house from the Crown Estate because the others didn’t suit you. Taking carrier bags full of cash from billionaires from the Middle East. Marrying a very young woman and then carrying on a years long affair with a married woman. Protecting your son who has been accused of serious sexual assault while throwing your grandson and mixed race wife under the bus. Refusing to provide security for your son, daughter in law and mixed race grandchildren. I could go on…

    • Magdalena says:

      Even tackier is using the excuse of that new “forever home” to STEAL 150 *acres* of public land and blocking access to a children’s nature centre to hide the fact that he and his wife don’t live together.

  10. Duch says:

    Also anyone else struck by how animated and tactile people are around Kris? I mean they’re not there just for networking, they really seem to enjoy her. I’m just basing this on pics here vs ones we usually get from parties.

    • Magdalena says:

      I don’t know much about her, but from what I’ve seen, despite the plastic surgeries, she appears to be down to earth, unpretentious, generous and considerate to those she interacts with and quite fun to be around, in addition to being a hard worker, so it is no wonder that people gravitate towards her or think fondly of her.

    • Caro says:

      I thought the same. A lot of love for her. Also, she looks amazing. Her plastic surgeon must be booked for decades now.

      • Hannah1 says:

        Yes, huge change from her recent pilgrim-core / Karl Lagerfeld appearance

      • Kitten says:

        Truly one of the most incredible facelifts I’ve ever seen and I appreciate that she’s been so open about it. She’s also lost a bit of weight too, right? She’s SEVENTY. Just crazy…in these pics she could be Kim’s sister.

      • Olive Malone says:

        I am in awe of her skin, especially her decolletage at 70! Since she is being open about her face work, maybe she will share info on the lasers or whatever she is doing.

    • Normades says:

      Kris seems like the smartest and most fun Kard in the deck. She seems like she’d be an absolute hoot to hang out with. Who wouldn’t want to drink and gossip with her?

      • MsIam says:

        Kris Jenner is the boss. I couldn’t believe some of the people she pulled for her party, young and old and not just from entertainment. People may consider the KarJenners a joke but you can’t say they don’t have clout.

  11. ThatGirlThere says:

    William deserves to shrivel up and cry with jealousy over Harry and Meghan being friends and friendly with the ultra rich and popular. I hope that Harry and Meghan had a fun date night and it’s clear that Beyoncé and Jay chose Kim side…

    It’s still tax the fuck out of the rich over here though.

  12. Lucia says:

    They’re not “friendly” with the Kardashians. Kris Jenner will pose with anyone. But did any of them show up on Meghan’s podcast or WLM? It seems like that would have been an easy get. Sure, they snagged an invite, and yes, that’s smart for possible networking. But the optics aren’t great for *any* of these people. It was a pretty gross display in these times for ALL involved. I think it would’ve been smarter for the Sussexes to simply send a gift and avoid the ostentatious show of KJ’s birthday. They’re simply not close enough friends that they HAD to show up. It was a bad PR move, plain and simple.

    • Magdalena says:

      They ARE friendly with the Kardashian-Jenners. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Kris Jenner was publicly voicing support for Meghan long before it became fashionable AND she also threw a protective arm around Doria, which I am certain that Meghan appreciated. Like it or not, they ARE close enough friends that they accepted the invitation. Personally, I think they attended because they actually LIKE Kris, but even if it were just a “PR move”, I think it was a fabulous one, because it shut down all of the stupid narratives which the UK media leeches had been planning to write about their having been “snubbed by Hollywood A-listers” yet again.

      And every single one of those celebrities and their staff will be taking note of all the nasty names Harry and Meghan (and by extension, the attendees) are being called, and remember this the next time the grifting, clout-chasing royals, always desperate for global coverage, go begging these same celebrities to attend their events. And I love this for them!

      • Magdalena says:

        Someone mentioned a long time ago something that people seem to forget: Kris Jenner (like Doria) has mixed-race grandchildren, and I can bet that despite their privileged upbringing, she is not unaware of the racism that they may face later in life, if they have not already encountered this. She would have been acutely aware of the names being hurled at mixed-race M and A before they left the UK.

    • Dee(2) says:

      I wouldn’t assume that Meghan asked them to be on WLM or any of the podcasts. I do know they posted thanks for her baskets , even going back to when it was American Riveria Orchard. And that they looked genuinely happy to be with her mother. And they were invited to the party so I would presume it’s not about ” posing” and about them genuinely having a friendship.

      The second part I really don’t understand. Do people honestly believe that everyone just stopped getting married, having kids, having birthday parties throughout times of strife in the United states? We have lived through depressions, recessions, assassinations, riots, racial distress, and other general times of crappiness in this country. And people still had good times from the poorest to the richest because asking people not to ever have a good time for that perfect time when it’s absolutely wonderful for everyone ( which has never existed) is just not feasible.

    • Jan says:

      The Sussexes can think for themselves. They looked liked they had a blast.

    • Amy Bee says:

      Nah, it’s clear that Harry and Meghan are friends with the Kardashians, particularly Kris.

    • Jais says:

      So they “snagged” an invite but then should’ve just sent a gift after snagging the invite? Huh. That doesn’t even make sense. It’s like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see which negative narrative sticks.

    • Over it says:

      How pray tell would you a rando
      Know who Meghan and Harry are close to ? I think it’s pretty bold of you to state your opinion as fact. I don’t know Harry or Meghan, but I am guessing from the fact that Meghan regularly send kris gift baskets from her as ever brand and kris always sends her public thanks,
      I would venture a guess that they are indeed friends.

    • Harla says:

      I seem to recall a photo of Harry and Corey hanging out in Aspen, somewhere snowy, so it would seem that the Sussex’s are at least somewhat close to Kris and Corey.

      • Normades says:

        Exactly and H&M attended Ellen and Portia’s vow renewel officiated by Kris which was a small-ish affair. They are most certainly friends and people insisting that they are not are ridiculous

      • Smatone99 says:

        Yeah, apparently they went on a skiing holiday together or at least at the same time and were hanging out.

    • Normades says:

      No there have been many reports of them hanging out together behind closed doors in the past couple of years. They are more than just “friendly acquaintances” they are friends with many mutuals who move in some of the same circles.

    • bloemheks says:

      Weren’t Paris Hilton and Mariah there? Both were on Archetypes.

  13. Tessa says:

    Scoot gave a very embarrassing interview boasting about balancing work and raising kids. He and keen take lots of vacations and if they increase the hours of work it would not hurt the parenting. Scoot is so s m a r m y yet he makes the media know each day how he dislikes the sussexes and celebrities yet he courts being with celebrities. He drove his brother and sister in law out yet he watches their every move and trashes them.

  14. Zut Alors says:

    Nothing will ever be as tacky as then Prince Charles accepting £1 million pounds in a plastic shopping bag from a Qatari official. Come on now.

  15. Jegede says:

    I loves it.👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

    To make money, you need to mingle money.

    Bezos, Zuckerberg, Gates, are not too shabby to have in your corner enroute to financial independence.

    And how is it so different from King Chuck constantly palling around with Arab sheiks?🙄🙄

  16. Jealousy thy names are the leftover Windsors. They were invited to a big celebrity party! They did not have to pay to be with these celebrities Peg. It seems it’s only tacky for the Sussexes.

  17. Maxine Branch says:

    A family with deep connections going back generations to pedophiles and having pedophiles as advisors throwing shade. Please. At least this was an open party where cameras could go to see who was there. The Windsor/Wales are cloak and dagger folks, they hide in plain site with their deplorable friends and associates front and center to their lives. They throw dirt and vileness using place sources and friends of instead of owning their narrative. The Sussexes speak directly to the camera with their full chest and their own words, owing what they say and do. The Sussexes are living their lives in the open, earning their money, making connections that will ensure they can remain financially independent, all while being philanthropic.

    • Nerd says:

      The royals have their secret annual end of year party with political and media big wigs where no photos are shared with the general public that pays for them.

  18. Alice B. Tokeless says:

    “But rich celebrities are going to throw parties, and it’s not like any of it came from American taxpayers.” Except that’s exactly who paid or it, as these billionaires don’t pay their fair share, if any, in taxes. The American tax payer absolutely paid for that party, as we pay for all of the extravagances of the wealthy; extravagances they can so easily afford since they pay negligible taxes.

    • Unstrung_Pearl says:

      Agreed. I still like the Sussexes, Adele etc but it doesn’t blind me from reality. A lot of people are losing everything right now, and the contrast is jarring.

      • Tate says:

        I feel the same way. So much suffering at t the hands of billionaires right now. Bezos being a main player in that suffering.

    • Dee(2) says:

      Come on these arguments are getting more specious. By that rationale we have paid for Meghan and Harry’s home because they’re wealthy, and her clothes, so we deserve to know everything about their lives and what they’re doing and what their kids looks like. This is venturing into the rationale that the British media makes for intrusion.

      • Debbie says:

        It also fails to take into consideration all the “regular people” who do business with the ultrarich by using Twitter/X or Amazon, etc. Not to mention the many besotted people who are dependent on public assistance (SNAP) and still voted for people like Trump during the last election. At a certain point, self-reflection and personal responsibility has to come into it too.

      • Carmen says:

        Kris had her party at Jeff Bezos’s mansion. There were 300 people there. In two days of reporting, there has not been one picture of Bezos and Lauren. Did Bezos host the party, or did Kris use his mansion to have her birthday party?

      • Betsy says:

        It took me approx three seconds to find pix of them. Lauren’s dress was ugh.

    • bisynaptic says:

      🎯

    • Lurker says:

      That’s a question for your government. Trump gave the uber rich tax cuts. Many very rich people spoke out about having no problem paying more taxes (they did under Reagan). But under Trump the money wouldn’t be used for the people anyway. Get Noem another jet, pay Vance another holiday, build Trump a stone arch, fill their pockets. They don’t use the taxes for the American people. If I were a millionaire in the US I wouldn’t want to give these grifters my money, but rather make donations. Which most of Kris Jenner’s guests do, generously.

    • Nerd says:

      So please let us know what percentage we paid for the party so that I can file it with my taxes this year. With that narrative, according to you, we pay for their homes, clothes, travel, vehicles and vacations, so they shouldn’t do anything fun or celebratory ever. It’s not as if anyone will avoid striving to make more money year after year, just because it will put them in a certain tax bracket or because you or I are expected to pay more in taxes than they are. Them being wealthy and having tax breaks that benefit them more than us, isn’t a reason why they should live their lives as if they aren’t wealthy. We have shutdowns all of the time and there will always be people less fortunate or poor in this country and to say that this one time is when they should have stayed in their million dollar homes and given the impression that they were eating Ramon noodles instead of caviar or expensive steaks, is unrealistic. They attended a charity that raised 18 million dollars just before this party, but because your tax break isn’t as great as theirs, they should be shamed into staying indoors and not enjoying life? Is there some diagram that breaks it down to who can do what based on how much they should be paying in taxes because it will become handy for them and the rest of us?

    • SgtPepper says:

      This is exactly the comment I was looking for! We can’t be seriously so obtuse/ignorant that we believe the rest of Americans currently suffering aren’t paying for this somehow? It’s possible because these very people have amassed so much wealth in their corner that can no longer be fairly redistributed. Its because the people that work for them all along the supply chain are not being fairly compensated. We might as well think of this party as being funded by the tax breaks given by Trump.

      I have no problem with rich people having fun and being rich. I have a problem when that happens while babies are literally starving and the best they can do is a fundraiser, even though they all have the political clout to make substantial policy change happen.

  19. Eurydice says:

    Yes, I’m over all this hand-wringing, too. H&M went to a fundraiser and then to a birthday party, period.

    • Christine says:

      I am with you. This amount of hand wringing feels entirely performative.

    • B says:

      Right? It feels so fake. The Sussexes are rich and well connected and they aren’t going to pretend otherwise. What they will do is use their resources to help others like how they donated at the Baby2Baby gala before the bday party and how they partner with other organizations via their foundation Archwell. They aren’t going to stop living their rich and well connected lives.

      I also find it extremely funny that there is all this outrage because the Sussexes went to a party at Bezos house but silence about Willy taking money from Bezos for Earthshot. It just really demonstrates how selective and fake this “outrage” is. The real issue never changes and its jealousy that Harry and Meghan are more famous than the left behind royals and anger that the lie about being shunned by Hollywood was ruined.

  20. Mrs. Smith says:

    Considering that scoots gets so giddy and goofy around celebrities and pays celebrities to attend his earth project events, I would wager he would LOVE to be invited to such a party. Seeing the fun candid photos coming out now must make it so much worse. And right on the heels of the Brazil tour, too. Oof.

  21. Over it says:

    I can’t speak for Harry and Meghan. However if given the choice, I would choose Kris and her family any day of the week over the left behinds because to my knowledge, none of kris and family have questioned her baby skin color. Allowed their palace flunkies to call her derogatory names . Have lunch with journalists who then go home to write disgusting. Hateful columns about her. Taken her and her husband and children security away and put them in real danger on a daily basis . So if I had to choose. It would be kris , kris and family. The left behinds never gave a f about me or my family. They wanted me out of their country, their business and their family. So who I hang out with is none of their f-info business

    • Magdalena says:

      I love this. Well said! 🙂

    • Number23KitKeller says:

      I meeeeannn… the Kardashians are problematic as HELL when it comes to race so let’s not ignore that.

      • Nerd says:

        So much so that people like Beyoncé, Jay Z, Stevie Wonder, Oprah, Gayle King, Ciara, Kerry Washington and a long list of other people of color still hanging out with them? I don’t know all of what people have seen or heard about them that makes them seen as problematic regarding race, but there’s a long list of POC who have an option of who they surround themselves with and the Kardashians are still some of those people.

  22. ABritGuest says:

    Not a fan of the Kardashians klan & how they gained notoriety. I am amazed at the pull Kris has to have pretty private people like Beyonce & Adele at her party. Even Stevie Wonder was there.

    But didn’t Charles & Camilla go on American idol as part of their coronation with Katy Perry & Lionel Richie getting invites all as part of the bargain for performing? They really aren’t above reality tv.

    • Julia says:

      Charles invited the presenter from UK Love Island to one of his garden parties and was pictured laughing and joking with her. The Windsors are tacky as they come…

    • Tessa says:

      Mike tindall went on a reality show yet no criticism about that. And keens uncle Gary went on a reality show as well

    • Nic919 says:

      Let’s not forget about Kate’s uncle Gary getting arrested for urinating in the streets.

    • Dee(2) says:

      Kris isn’t just famous for her daughters sex tape. Her first husband was one of THE celebrity lawyers back in the day. There’s a reason OJ picked him. Plus she was married to a former Olympian. She’s been going to and hosting parties like this since the 80s. The guest list isn’t that shocking. I’m sure the amount of people she knows or knew their parents and watched them grow up is deep. Kim wouldn’t have been in the spot to be Paris Hilton’s,” closet organizer” if she wasn’t already connected. And she was connected in her early twenties, because her parents were connected.

  23. Brassy Rebel says:

    Two things can be true. The party was tacky and no one loves tacky more than the Windsors. They wish they had been there!

  24. Nic919 says:

    The main issue with Harry and Meghan being seen with K clan with most people is because that family plays footsie with trump. Meanwhile William has been seen associating with Jared and Ivanka who have actively harmed people.

    No Windsor has a leg to stand on here because their associations are so much worse.

  25. sunnyside up says:

    Last week, shock horror probe, Harry and Kate are being ignored by the ‘A’ list, this week shock horror probe, Harry and Kate attend an ‘A’ list party.
    The media needs to make up its mind.

  26. Megan says:

    I’m disappointed to see them (and Beyonce and Jayz) there. Hanging out with folks like Bezos (to say nothing of the Kardashians) isn’t a good look under any circumstance but particularly when there is a government shutdown and kids are losing access to food. I wish people would stay away from evil jerks like Bezos and not allow their glamour to humanize him.

    • Lucy says:

      Thank you. Yes.

    • Elly says:

      Wouldn’t it be a good thing if Harry and Meghan could influence billionaires (like Bezos) to be more philanthropic?

    • Betsy says:

      The government shutdown is Bezos’s fault? Kris should reschedule her birthday until the government opens again?

      There have always been rich people. There always will be. Get over it. And many of them, like Gates, are pretty philanthropic.

      • Megan says:

        Bezos has supported Trump financially and through his control and ideological realignment of the Washington Post so while I don’t think he’s directly to blame for the shutdown, he is culpable in the broader US state of affairs. Beyond that, he is not particularly philanthropic. (I agree that Gates is, although we could have a broader conversation about the nature of Gates’s philanthropy, particularly the kinds of educational initiatives he supports.)

        Also, philanthropy is inherently flawed. Why should I trust the kinds of investments billionaires make in “social good”? For every Mackenzie Scott, who is committed to no-strings attached donations to causes that I personally support, there’s a Peter Thiel. So, no thank you; I don’t think I will get over it.

        Anyway, should Kris have cancelled her party? Maybe. It would have been a powerful statement, but I doubt she cares. And it’s that lack of care that I hate to see people I think more highly of (Bey, Jayz, Meghan, Harry, Oprah) consorting with.

      • Betsy says:

        Then don’t get over it. You’re going to be pretty angry and disappointed the rest of your life, then.

        And not every billionaire is a Mr. Peanuts with top hat and monocle chortling at his foot on the neck of the workers. Because I live where I live I know a few personally. They’re mostly just regular people with more money.

    • Walking the Walk says:

      Thank you! And honestly there is blowback against Beyonce and her Christmas drop on Black TikTok. People are tired of just opening up their pocket books and these people do this mess. Forget it.

  27. NoBS Please says:

    The Royals and their media pack truly look like unhinged drooling morons, desperate to smear Harry and Meghan with anything, even if completely contradictory.

    Does anyone still take them seriously?

    Imagine their headlines if H&M HADN’T attended Kris Jenner’s party – the UK media would have had a field day with their Hollywood Losers narrative. So the nonsense they’re coming up with is their meagre consolation prize.

    It’s pathetic, and the whole world can see it.

  28. one of the marys says:

    On a different note I found this interesting “the couple should not be accepted back” and the use of the verb accepted. It gives the royal family agency as if they have a say in the decisions M&H are making. They are not seeking acceptance so how many years are the tabloids going to keep this narrative going? It’s delusional

    • MsIam says:

      Well if they shouldn’t be “accepted” back then that should put an end to this narrative right? The Sussexes are doing fine in Montecito so let them breathe and focus on your wonderful, acceptable, respectable Royals in the UK. If you can find any, other than the children of course.

  29. Ana says:

    IMO they’re all tacky as hell, Sussexes and left-behinds both. I have so much sympathy for the Sussexes but I find their associating with these rich a-holes…problematic.

    • Number23KitKeller says:

      I’m in the same boat. I like them but with the direction things are going it’s hard not to look at that party and just see billionaires who are literally making money off the crumbling democracy and erasure of any middle class. Every decision is to further destroy anything left in the system set up to protect normal people. Perhaps it’s just he scrutiny of extreme wealth and the widening gap of any fallacy of relatability that has us disappointed. They owe us nothing. They should live their lives the way they want to. But it’s just a bummer to see.

    • Genevieve says:

      Same. I can’t stand the left-behinds, but the Kardashians are awful, and it’s depressing that anyone hangs out with them.

      • Heather says:

        Also, bring disappointed that Harry and Meghan went to this doesn’t mean that somehow William and his wife don’t suck. This isn’t a zero sum game.

        It doesn’t change the fact that the British tabloids have been horrible and racist to Meghan.

        Two things can be true at the same time: Harry and Meghan have way more rizz than William and Kate. AND Harry and Meghan going to a billionaire ball while millions of Americans are starving was a mistake.

    • Walking the Walk says:

      I know a few people said they were concerned with how things were shaking out with WLM and As Ever and that it felt directionless. Now with WLM about to wrap up and she’s doing just the food and booze drops….I am good. I think she got treated terribly, glad she got her bag, and I am not going to worry about her after this. I got my own problems.

  30. QuiteContrary says:

    Ah yes, the left- behinds have so much class that Charles joked about being Camilla’s tampon; Charles and Camilla laughed at Inuit singers performing for them; William sucked up to Tom Cruise, of all people, at a movie premiere; and Kate flashes her hoo-ha every chance she gets. True class!!

    Meghan and Harry are A-listers who went to the A-list party celebrating a friend. Send them to the Hague!!! Spare me.

    (Also, poor Louise … if she somehow became popular, Kate would cut her down like a weed.)

  31. Guessing says:

    So.. out of all the people who attended Kris Jenner birthday party, who will Will try to get to attend his Earthshot Prize or something else? Who will that family try to get close to?
    You know it’s coming

    • MsIam says:

      You know they are already working on trying to find people who would bother to show up. The Royals make regular trips to India, so I imagine a lot of Bollywood stars may appear.

  32. DonnaDraper says:

    Are they not though?

    • jais says:

      Tacky? Sure. But with the source being insiders of the RF, it becomes a pot meets kettle situation. And then, if you want, a which one is more awful type deal and is that really the type of scrutiny the Windsors need? Throwing stones from a protected tabloid bubble is silly. Especially for a family coming from a history of colonialism that goes beyond tackiness.

    • Chlo says:

      I think it was totally tacky. Totally below H&M. Totally gross. I was totally disappointed when I saw they attended, as I was with a bunch of other people there too.

  33. Henny Penny says:

    William and Kate fell over themselves showing Trump and Melania a great time last month. I don’t think I have EVER seen Kate happier or more enthralled than she was sitting next to Jabba during that State dinner as he slobbered all over her while regaling everyone with tales of her unsurpassed beauty (barf). And has Kate EVER done an extended photoshoot with another wife of a head of state like the one she did with Jabba’s wife the next day? And I’ve never seen Melania happier, either Clearly the four of them have something (cough cough) in common . All of this is rather rich coming from Scooter and Wigs.

  34. smee says:

    KJ showing off her facelift, which looks amazing atm

    I bet the photo of KJ and H&M is cute. I love seeing the candid shots of H & M too

    As always, they look relaxed and part of a topnotch social circle. I could only think of how effortless H would have looked on the Brazilian volleyball court and how awkward and jazz-handed his bro would be here…

  35. Elly says:

    Harry and Meghan can’t win no matter what they do. They’re criticized for being “hated” by Hollywood and the very next day they’re criticized for attending an A-list party. In reality the A-list party was a great opportunity for H&M to network and garner funds for their multiple charities. The comparison is made (by Page Six) of H&M attending the party with William and is “at odds” with what William is doing for the monarchy. What is William actually doing for the monarchy? From what I’ve observed William goes on numerous holidays, hoards money and mansions and rides around on a scooter, throws tantrums like a 5 year old and threatens family members with taking away their titles.

  36. bisynaptic says:

    LOL The BRF looking down their noses at anyone for being “ostentatious”! Well, at least, they’ve given up on the talking point that “Hollywood is done with them”. Now, they’re fixated on Meghan’s body shape.

    Your celebrity worship is duly noted, @Kaiser, but not all celebrities are created equal. The Kardashians *are* tacky, and going to this party at fascist-bootlicking Jeff Bezos’s house was a bad idea.

  37. B says:

    This article reeks of jealousy and impotent rage. The “classy” future king invited several celebrities to the most important event of his calendar just last week and couldn’t get a headline. He’s just insanely jealous his brother and sister in law are more famous than him and hang with other famous people. In the bad old days he could release his jealousy by finding excuses to punish them but the Sussexes are free and outside his reach so now he can only rant and rave like any other obsessed troll on the internet.

  38. Lilly (with the double-L) says:

    “Speaking of, all of the hand-wringing over the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s attendance at Kris Jenner’s party is leaving me cold” and me. Thanks for that. It’s a sign of having a successful, engaging site: MAGAs and royalists are coming in barely disguised 🥸. It’s nice to see many long-standing posters spot it immediately, you rock.

  39. Lover says:

    There may or may not have been bot activity in that other post, I don’t know. But it’s fair to express disappointment in people you like doing ill judged things. Plenty of folks here have voiced disappointment over things I’d consider not such a big deal, like H wanting to connect with his dying father or As Ever running out of jam. You can like H&M and find the Kris party distasteful, it’s not “hand wringing” or “performative” or “bot activity” to say so—or are we willing to call it hand wringing and performative when we savage Kate’s ugly outfits and Camilla’s horrible friends and Will’s helicopter overuse? (“That’s just what rich people do!”) The royalists are hypocrites for criticizing H&M when the BRF are grossly ostentatious and have reprehensible friends. I think H&M have built their fortune far more fairly than the Windsors did and have better friends as well as some awful ones, and I think attending a Bezos-hosted party for a Kardashian attended by Zuckerberg and other billionaires is a bad look during a desperate time in our country. I see that M is trying to build her brand, and I don’t think this was good for her brand. I also think she’s a lovely, talented and hardworking person, and H wrote an excellent book and does good work and has a warm heart. All these things can be true and it is a fair opinion. H&M are doing great, they can handle a social media site that they most likely do not read having posters express chagrin now and then. It’s not that deep.

    • Heather says:

      Thank you. I support Harry and Meghan. I thought them going to Jeff Bezos’s house while so many Americans are going hungry was an unforced error.

      But also, William just flew private to a climate change summit. Him calling this out is the height of hypocrisy.

      Just because I’m a fan of Harry and Meghan doesn’t mean I’ll blindly defend all they do. That would make me no better than a deranged Daily Mail commentator screaming about everything they do.

    • L4Frimaire says:

      You may not like it but I don’t think this is ill judged at all. I’m tired of people acting like they don’t know what they’re doing. Attending this party served a useful purpose, whether we like the Kardashians or assh*le Bezos or not.

  40. HeatherC says:

    I’m currently not feeling great lol so my thoughts are scattered. Bear with me.

    The Jenner-Kardashians are tacky and have leaned into it. They’re also rich rich. I’m not going to get into our broken unfair tax system. Way above my pay grade at this febrile moment.

    Everyone seemed like they had fun and it was definitely A list. If Bezos and his blow up doll had been there, there would have been pictures. So I think they loaned the house or something as a venue.

    I liked the skirt part of Meghan’s outfit (is it a dress? is it separates? idk). I don’t like the top half. It looks like it stepped out of a Robert Palmer music video (go watch “Addicted to Love” and get some high quality ear worms stuck in your head. You can thank me later lol).

    But in my fever dreams I feel a missed opportunity. Wouldn’t it have been a blast if Gisele had been there and taken pictures with Harry and Meghan? I believe she blanked Will “I’m not takcky with my five forever homes and future palaces and my status as a slumlord and I AM tax payer funded haha”

    Because I am petty and on antibiotics, those are my thoughts

  41. DianeS says:

    Not a Kardashian fan but I have to say, whoever did Kris’s latest face lift is a GENIUS. She looks great.

  42. SN says:

    It was as a grifter like behavior, at least now, this couple can’t act holier than thou. Just like we call out racist attacks directed at them, we also should criticize them for legitimate reasons. Just because there were many black celebrities or A listers, it doesn’t mean the K’s are good. Everyone involved is just trash. Fame makes people act like prostitutes, selling their morality for money and access.

    • bloemheks says:

      They don’t act holier than thou just like Meghan has never been vegan. The press characterizes them that way and it’s sick and twisted how much people care when the men running the show get driven around in limo’s with blacked out windows, flown in helicopters, are removing the one photo of themselves on websites and are starting to surround themselves with military-esque private security forces.

      In the face of all that, I don’t know how to care what the American celebrity socialites are doing. Just like I don’t care whether Kate enjoyed sitting next to Trump or not. They are not the problem.

  43. bloemheks says:

    Celebrities provide great cover for the Lords of Finance and Industry. Humans aren’t good at being angry at the faceless, so we look for and create symbols to focus our ire at.

    We were subjecting women to witch burnings and prolonged public ridicule bordering on mass psychosis long before Marie Anntoinette. Even historians gave credence to propaganda printed about her for 200 years as if she had anything to do with any of it.

    The party was in poor taste for everybody there, but aside from Bezos (who was not there) these people are not the ones running the show nor are they the richest. I have no opinion on H&M attending. Maybe they went for fun, maybe to support friends, maybe to make financial connections for business and philanthropy, maybe to topple the “no one in Hollywood can stand them narrative,” or maybe it was just what everyone was doing after the Baby2Baby Gala and they said f*ck it, lets go. We’re going to get pilloried either way.

    In the same situation, I would have gone if I wanted to go. When you can’t win, at some point trying is just too exhausting. It’s not Epstein Island ffs.

  44. BeanieBean says:

    William has a plan and he has true class? Is he going to build a golden ballroom? Oh, wait, he has one already. Several, in fact. 🙄. The level of ostentatiousness was too much for Billy Boy, as he settles in to his fifth forever home? Plus, does the writer not remember TQs gold-leaf piano?? Bill inherits that. All of it. Gold piano, gold coach, the works. 🙄🙄🙄

  45. Big Bertha says:

    All of these people are aligned with Donald Trump and his policies. Bad move by Harry and Meghan.

    • jais says:

      Beyonce and Oprah campaigned for Harris. So no, not ALL the people there are aligned with Trump. It’s a bad move to make sweeping comments that are simply not true.

    • Bloemheks says:

      All of them are not associated with Donald Trump. Most of the names mentioned are associated with the left, because the right has made them a convenient scapegoat for all things rich and extravagant. The men with the real money and power are left alone while we fixate on the glamorous, because even though we’re mad at the rich, we still love the glamour.

      Meghan and Harry don’t wax on about inequality and social justice nearly as much as many of the people in attendance. Megan rarely says anything at all and none of them have the influence they’re attributed with having. It’s not that I think H&M or any celebrity is above criticism, but we do make up narratives about them with little real evidence and often in the face of evidence in direct contradiction to the narrative we like best.

      I’m here, because I’ve been watching since they got engaged and the way Meghan has been treated is a travesty. Nothing she has done or not done rises to the level of scrutiny and hysteria she’s subjected to, day in and day out. If I were her, I would have said screw it, I’m going to enjoy being rich a long time ago. They’ll hate me either way.

  46. Gabby says:

    The Windsors and their rota minions need to shut all the way up. The RF could stand to learn something from the Kardashians about loving and supporting family members. And also about getting off your ass and working.

    Besides, what is tackier than flashing your bare ass on the tarmac because you think you’re just that hot? Or being caught in the most unsexy and laughable phone sex ever recorded?

  47. Ohwell says:

    Ostentatious and monarchy are bedfellows…

  48. L4Frimaire says:

    This is another case of the palaces not really having a good or even remotely reasonable response to what the Sussexes do, other than they don’t like them being accepted around powerful people. So it’s tacky for Harry and Meghan to attend a birthday party but ok for King Charles to have some of those very same people from that party at his state banquet for Trump or for William to fly in celebrities for his Earthshot. As for the Sussex fans who don’t like this, why exactly? We all love when they visit places like Colombia and Nigeria for goodwill or charitable events( despite thise countries human rights records), have no problem with them going to celebrity filled fundraisers like Baby2Baby or Kevin Costners 1st responders event and we obviously love the philanthropic work and events they participate in. However there is a definite issue with how they spend their social life. I don’t understand people who would love for the Sussexes to be billionaires (not my wish), but then get bothered with them hanging out with the billionaire class. I personally would have loved to see them at something like a Zohran Mamdani fundraiser but that’s not happening yet. I need to give this more of a think but all this is related to their proximity to power, whether it’s royalty or incredibly rich people or organizations with social capital. Even when they do the right thing, they need to appear to be above it all and flawless, and sometimes just going out for a good time with privileged people they know is not the right optics for some people. Then again, the snubbed by Hollywood story can be put to rest now.

  49. Magdalena says:

    A birthday party was in poor taste or “tacky” simply because wealthy people attended? We don’t even know what was on the menu. Should people NOT celebrate their birthdays? Did they eat live babies? Throw rocks at chained up slaves? It was a birthday party paid for by the birthday lady, not a government funded Great Gatsby party at the White House. The same people complaining about this would be calling Kris Jenner a hypocrite for cancelling or NOT having a party “in solidarity” with the poor people on SNAPS (many of whom voted FOR Trump, sorry to point this out). It is ridiculous to expect rich people to pretend to be poor and it is always insulting when they attempt to do this. Many of the people at the party actually helped raise USD 18 million hours before arriving. Jeebus.

    What would have been an acceptable way for Kris Jenner to celebrate her 70th birthday according to the complainers? Should she have sat at home alone or just had a dinner with her children and not met up with her friends? I’ll bet if she had done that and simply responded to the host of wealthy people wishing her a happy birthday on social media people would STILL have complained.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment