Royalist: Prince Harry’s titles must be removed after his Late Show skit!

On Wednesday evening, Prince Harry appeared on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. The Windsors had no warning, which means the royal reporters had no warning. Which means the right-wing press in the UK and America had no warning either. And they were ALL furious about it. Furious that Harry was charming and cute, furious that he did a funny skit about Hallmark Christmas movies, and furious that Harry “went nuclear on Trump.” That was the Daily Beast’s headline, “Harry goes nuclear on ‘King’ Trump in Colbert Interview.” It wasn’t an interview, it was a skit written by Colbert’s writers. The nuclear and hyperpolitical statement was as follows. Harry: “Well, you Americans are obsessed with Christmas movies and you’re clearly obsessed with royalty, so why not?” Colbert: “Hold on, I wouldn’t say we’re obsessed with royalty.” Harry: “I heard you elected a king.” Harry also got a good crack in there about CBS’s settlement with Trump (but few people are talking about that).

So, now, obviously, people are screaming, crying and throwing up about Harry’s highly political speech and how dare he call Trump a king, even though Trump actually loves it when people call him a king, a fascist, and an authoritarian. Like, Trump does not care whatsoever. He takes pride in it. Which is why I thought Harry got away with saying it – it wasn’t actually some highly critical political speech, it was a joke based in truth about how Americans voted for that orange f–ker who acts like a king. But according to Tom Sykes via his Royalist Substack, this is truly the dumbest thing Harry has ever done. Come for the insider knowledge of Harry’s affection for Colbert and stay for Sykes pushing Reddit conspiracies.

I believe Harry thought he was being funny, but this was hardly the venue to be plunging headlong into America’s defining fear of the moment: creeping authoritarianism. This at a time when the Trump administration is reportedly cancelling visas for people who merely criticize conservative influencers, a moment when political deviation — even trivial deviation — can be treated as grounds for removal.

Harry, of all people, should understand the danger of playing in that space; he has been threatened with deportation himself. Trump’s allies have openly tried to weaponize his drug use disclosures in Spare to force the release of his visa records, arguing he should never have been admitted to the United States. Harry knows his residency has already been dangled as a political cudgel. Against that backdrop, his decision to publicly mock a famously thin-skinned U.S. president feels almost self-destructive.

His friends tell me he did the show out of affection for Colbert — a man the royals cannot stand after he repeated false claims about William’s alleged affair for which he was later forced to apologize — and that Harry believes he’s free to speak his mind now that he’s no longer a working royal. I think if he were truly living as Harry Wales, private citizen, that argument would hold water.

But he isn’t Harry Wales. He’s Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. And in the American imagination, he still carries the full aura of a prince — a representative of the monarchy. A global audience does not grasp that Harry isn’t still a part of the Windsor family business. Charles and William may be hundreds of miles away in Balmoral or Windsor, but in the American mind they are standing just offstage as Harry delivers his punchlines.

At the Sandringham Summit Harry and Meghan vowed to uphold the values of Her Majesty. At its most obvious, that seem to entail keeping out of politics, and protecting the Crown’s apolitical stance. And here a royal prince is, on American national television, mocking a sitting U.S. president. Most viewers aren’t parsing the nuanced distinction between working and non-working royals. They simply see a British prince insulting their head of state. That leaves Charles in a diplomatic chokehold.

I think the monarchy now has no real choice. The titles must be removed, not as punishment, but for clarity. Removing them draws a clear blue line between Prince Harry the royal and Harry Windsor the private citizen. It protects the monarchy from his volatility. It frees Harry from expectations he clearly rejects. And it stops the public assuming he speaks for an institution he keeps undermining. I have led reporting that William has been considering this step; after last night, I think that window has become a doorway.

Harry must know conspiracy theories will now ignite again on Reddit — that he’s trying to get himself deported, that he wants out of California, that he’s manoeuvring toward some dramatic exit. It’s nonsense, of course, but he makes this nonsense easy to believe.

He either doesn’t understand the danger he walked into last night, or he simply no longer cares, having developed a craving for the spotlight and for applause that overwhelms caution, context, and even self-preservation.

[From The Royalist Substack]

“Harry went on Colbert” = Harry’s titles must be removed! “Harry joked about Americans voting for a king” = Harry is trying to get deported! In recent months, it’s been very curious to see the whole “Trump should deport Harry” story completely disappear. Right-wingers on both sides of the Atlantic were trying to make it happen for three whole years, but when Trump was asked about it directly, he said he wasn’t interested in deporting Harry. It will be interesting to see if this turns into something though – there are a lot of political operatives with some kind of vested interest in destroying Harry and Meghan.

Also: “Charles and William may be hundreds of miles away in Balmoral or Windsor, but in the American mind they are standing just offstage as Harry delivers his punchlines.” LMAO. Americans are not clutching their pearls, crying “what would the king think of this???” And this was a funny aside as well: “Colbert — a man the royals cannot stand after he repeated false claims about William’s alleged affair for which he was later forced to apologize.”

Screencaps courtesy of CBS/Late Show.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

88 Responses to “Royalist: Prince Harry’s titles must be removed after his Late Show skit!”

  1. They are so pissed that Harry got a standing ovation and his SKIT was well received and very funny. Salt Isle needs to take a seat. Harry is not in your control and he never will be!! Keep on thriving and having fun Harry!!!

    • Hypocrisy says:

      I personally loved the skit and have enjoyed the laughs… no title is worth letting them steal your laughter, but I personally hope the Sussex’s make them pry the title from their Montecito tanned hands.. every time the leftovers fall short they are screaming for the Sussex’s titles sucks that the leftovers just can’t accept that they are inferior in every way especially when it comes to charisma and character.

    • Not a Subject says:

      That reporter needs to touch grass. Seriously. It’s comedic at this point how threatened abd spiteful they are about every tiny thing.

      • StarWonderful says:

        Tom Sucks needs to mind the “danger” he’s in by sounding like a hysterical clown and thinking himself a journalist of some kind.

  2. ThatGirlThere says:

    Harry killed it on Colbert and THATS what the left behinds and raggedy press are really pissed if about, not the “political waters” that Harry weighed into.

    Heh, I forgot about the Willy & Rose affair Coblbert joked about 🤭

    • Ginger says:

      I also forgot about Colbert talking about the Will and Rose affair lol
      This makes me like Harry’s sketch even more lol

      It’s well known how much Colbert hates the monarchy but he clearly adores Harry.

    • jais says:

      And the funniest part is that Sykes was one of the first people to write about the Rose affair so him calling Colbert out for it is pretty rich.

    • Bean says:

      HE WAS SO FUNNY! He was charming, at ease and a natural. Willy could never and it KILLS him.
      That standing o was EPIC.

      • Isabella says:

        It was wonderful to see Harry sticking up for Colbert, who was fired for complaining about Trump, despite the show’s top ratings. From People:
        “CBS’ cancellation comes just days after the talk show host criticized the network’s parent company, Paramount, for its July 3 $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump, who alleged that CBS News’ 60 Minutes deceptively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Meanwhile, Paramount is in the midst of a merger with entertainment company Skydance — a deal that will need approval from the Trump administration.”

    • CatGotMyTongue says:

      Oh, dude. Colbert did a deep dive! Apparently his wife is “one of us” and filled him in on the whole thing. Sure, they made him apologize… but he had the entire scoop. It was glorious.

  3. Eurydice says:

    At this point all I hear is – blah, blah, Harry, blah, blah, outrage, blah, blah, titles, blah.

    • Julie says:

      I heard about the same 🙂

      • kirk says:

        Plus, we all know after the Andy, Formerly Known as Prince, process that the dukedom can only truly be removed by an Act of Parliament – which could be politically fraught since royals are supposed to be sphinx-like apolitical neutrals hovering around the government. Even after Chuck used other legal tricks to get Andy’s ‘HRH’ and ‘Prince’ removed, he still remains in the line of succession! To get Andy out of the line of succession would not only require an Act of Parliament, but it would have to be ratified by all 14 Commonwealth countries where Chuck is the recognized King. So stop banging your drum BRFCo Sykophant TomTom.

    • Maja says:

      I also heard the blah blah blah….

    • Gtwiecz says:

      Yawn. Tom Yikes speaks for the old royalist folks without critical thinking who think the royals are special. Let them squirm! Harry does not give AF.

  4. Sunniside up says:

    A journal that calls itself Royal Sub. should know that Harry isn’t Harry Wales and hasn’t been Harry Wales ever since his father became King. He is just Prince Harry now, or The Duke of Sussex or Harry Sussex.

    • Gail says:

      @Sunniside up
      The funniest thing about your comment is you inadvertently even corrected his gross error. Harry has NEVER been ‘Harry Windsor’. You corrected it to Wales which is closer to being accurate, but is still wrong as you point out cause he’s Harry Sussex now. LOL

  5. Iheoma Nwakpadolu says:

    ..and Steven did apologise. He made some sympathetic statements about the cancer.

  6. Tessa says:

    Charles went on t.v. shows acting silly. There was the royal knockout show where senior royals participated. And peggs riding that scooter around. And the keens shampoo commercials Take all their titles.

  7. Nanea says:

    Oh how they’re all envious of Harry’s charm and his ability to connect with people.

    Harry was not only funny, but his timing was nearly perfect for someone who doesn’t do this for a living.

    “At the Sandringham Summit Harry and Meghan vowed to uphold the values of Her Majesty.”
    QEII died in September 2022. Her successor and his heir don’t have values. See bahs full of cash, access for money, titles in return for favours. And they don’t deserve any kind of admiration or deference.

    “At its most obvious, that seem to entail keeping out of politics, and protecting the Crown’s apolitical stance.”
    Keeping out of politics the way CRex did when he was the POW? Black Spider memos anyone, for starters? Neither BP nor KP are apolitical.

    So it seems Harry did very well while highlighting the shortcomings of the Left-Behind royals.

    • StarWonderful says:

      The Left-Behinds violated whatever Harry was forced to accept in the Sandringham Summit, so there really is no contractual agreement. They removed his security & allowance and increased their attacks on Harry, Meghan, Archie, and later, Lily.

    • CatGotMyTongue says:

      His timing was impeccable! Especially for someone who isn’t even a “pro” performer.

  8. Auburnleaf says:

    The way this is framed also makes it sound like Harry is the only one with the bravery to speak truth to power. The US strips visas for political jokes! Trump retaliates and may deport Harry! Trump is an unstable authoritarian who prohibits free speech! ….and so Harry is anything other than a hero for being willing to publicly mock that??

  9. Dee(2) says:

    Okay, strip his titles, and? This stuff is getting so tiresome. When are they going to get it through their heads that Harry got a standing ovation, this skit went viral, and everyone loved it because he’s funny and charming. Not because a mannequin said the lines. William could not have delivered this, Edward could not have delivered this, it has nothing to do with being Prince whatever.

    The right wing press already finds every single thing that Harry does wrong, so he doesn’t care about pleasing them. The British media also is the same. The people that found it funny, commented kindly, and saw how charming and funny he was and were the people that responded the way that they did.

    This over the top ridiculous reaction, like it’s the 15th century is why these people can’t connect to a larger audience. They are so stuffy, so lacking humor, so arrogant and convinced of their own importance just because of proximity to others that they drive people off. If you see that the general consensus is amusement, why would you think that this was a bad thing? They’re consistent ability to look at two and two and always get seven is why no one likes those left behind royals.

    • Lorelei says:

      It’s so stupid. I’ve said this on here before, but no one besides the RF and BM will care. Everyone will still think of him as and call him Prince Harry. That’s just who he is and always will be. Everyone still says “Princess Diana” and think of Elizabeth when the “Queen” is mentioned. The official titles/styles don’t matter to most of the world.

    • CatGotMyTongue says:

      He will always be Prince Harry. And everyone knows it. Too bad! So sad.

  10. Brassy Rebel says:

    CBS is doing a town hall with…wait for it…Erika Kirk. There is literally nothing Harry could say about CBS or MAGA that would be going too far. It’s the Capitulated Broadcasting System.

  11. Normades says:

    “His friends tell me he did the show out of affection for Colbert”
    Sure, Jan.

  12. Siri says:

    Harry was never threatened with deportation by the US. All that deportation nonsense was from some organization here that is headed by a Brit. It was never a threat from the US government. Anyway, why does the author care about Harry being deported? The Brits have been screaming about wanting Harry being kicked out of every country he visits, but at the same time claim they don’t want him back in the UK. They just don’t want this man to exist. Everyone knows that Harry doesn’t represent the royal family when he speaks, the royal family has made that painfully clear to everyone. He is an outcast and continues to be, but the Americans still love him.

    Their obsession with silencing this man is scary. Every time they raise concerns I think they are hiding a scandal beyond our wildest dreams. Innocent people just don’t keep up this much fuss about someone else’s very existence unless that person knows something truly awful about them. The more protests I see from the royal family’s mouthpieces, the more suspicious I get. I can’t help but to think they must be covering up one hell of a scandal.

    • one of the marys says:

      I agree there’s been so much coverage you’d have to be under a rock to think Harry is still part of the family business. He’s very obviously living independently in the US.

  13. jais says:

    What a shocker. Harry does a cute bit about being a real prince auditioning to be a Hallmark prince and now we’ve got the usual suspects crying, oh yeah, well Harry won’t be a real prince much longer. Bc…check…notes…he’s not a working-royal. Ummm sure. Sykes is arguing that we don’t understand but actually I think they’re the ones that don’t get it. Americans know that Harry is the son of the king and a part of the royal family. They’re the ones making it about a business and how much work one does…which Americans are pretty clear that um…that is not what royalty is, royalty is by birth. You know how we know that?…bc of all the Hallmark movies, lol.
    Sykes argues that, “A global audience does not grasp that Harry isn’t still a part of the Windsor family business.” Um no. We’re all aware. Sussexit was pretty dramatic and the BM has been talking about it for years. And you can still be a part of the family without being in the business. And then “Most viewers aren’t parsing the nuanced distinction between working and non-working royals.” Why would we? They’re the ones that care about that. At this point, all of the Wales kids are non-working but have titles.

    • Nanea says:

      “Harry does a cute bit about being a real prince auditioning to be a Hallmark prince”

      I really love how Hallmark entered the chat, posting on their Hallmark channel account — “The Gingerbread Prince Saves Christmas in Nebraska”
      Coming 2026 😉🤞

      This skit isn’t on its way out yet.

      • kirk says:

        That’s hilarious! And they called him an American!

        hallmarkchannel – “Prince Harry, how did you know we were looking for a horse-riding helicopter-flying American Hallmark Prince? No audition needed, you’re hired!”

      • Barb Mill says:

        I would kinda love Harry to do a Hallmark Christmas movie. I have to admit this time of year Cheesy Christmas movies are my one guilty pleasure.

    • Dee(2) says:

      Exactly! These people are the ones who don’t understand the audience. Royalty is because of the family you’re born into, not the job you do as these people see it. It’s why these Hallmark movies are so popular. It’s why these romance novels where some random woman who owns a flower shop finds out she is the long lost granddaughter of some fake European countries King, gets swept up in being a princess.

      Hello! The Princess diaries anyone? No one is saying all these stories don’t make sense because she wasn’t a working Royal her entire life so she’s not really a princess. It’s so stupid and it doesn’t address the actual issue that they have, that working or not, living in the UK or not, Harry’s charm and ability to connect with people and be down to earth is what makes him appealing as a prince and as a person. Which the latter is much more important.

    • Eurydice says:

      The other thing the BM doesn’t get about the audience is that millions of people have been turning out for “Not My King” rallies and there are standing protests every week, practically community get togethers. One mild joke from Harry is no big deal compared to that – the audience will hardly notice before moving on. The real joke is the Hallmark movies, which have pretty much become part of our TV culture now.

  14. Connie says:

    I really can’t stand England. America is a FU country when it comes to my people. I’ve had my share of racism since I started Pre-K. It was hell walking to school and being called the N word by and elderly woman every morning. Then i had to walk pass this crazy European racist prick who tied his dog to a tree with a long chain I had to walk in the street. That man cursed me out every day .
    I was so upset with my parents for moving to America. We were taught self hate in school. They gave us a book that showed how we evolved from apes to humans. All black communities were considered poor, drug infested, bad schools and low IQ. There were issues but not the way they reported it. Every Wednesday Newsday had an article about the DOOMED AA. You begin to believe it. My sisters were very smart. One was reward the best written essay in the county( this was in mid 60s). My older sister was on the deans list in college. I had a friend who’s professor told all the black students the highest grade they would receive was a C. He didn’t care if you aced every test. If you were failing he had no problems giving you a F.

    It’s so disgusting what they are doing to Meghan. Yesterday Carol Malone said Doria was in jail and big belly father raised Meghan. Meghan a yacht girl., slept with Andrew, she’s 50, she steals, fake pregnancy. she has a child. Yet they’re not racist. I really hate that country because this is an attack on melanated women. I’m 65 and have seen this BS all my life.?We’re the problem. Meghan has to have regrets. They’re demanding Meghan to go to the Philippines. Sugar daddy had a stroke. I don’t believe he’s in the hospital. He lied twice. He’s a piece of💩.

    • jais says:

      Okay, I’m actually not one to say call the lawyers that often but Carol Malone saying on tv that Doria was in jail…okay, wtf, yeah, call the layers.

      • Deborah1 says:

        Doria was never in jail. This rumour started because someone identified a person with a similar name and a criminal record as being Meghan’s mother. It’s absolutely false. Doria should sue for defamation.

    • bisynaptic says:

      I hate to break it to you, but we’re still all apes. 😁

    • Amity says:

      I really feel for you Connie and stand in solidarity with you. It’s heartbreaking what the USA and UK push day after day, bunch of braindead unseasoned fools.
      I wish the world was getting better but it’s really not.
      Meghan is a shining light and I hope by her knowing she is loved by so many it can drown out the noise of these awful turkey necked, mediocre fools.

  15. Anna says:

    Lolz they are just mad he is popular. William went on the random Apple TV show, and Edward used to run a celebrity skit show back in the 90s – it was just a total flop. Harry had a great day and Meghan sold out her chocolates.

    • Debbie says:

      And, don’t forget that Charles and Camilla went on American Idol, for God’s sake. What about that?

      • Kittenmom says:

        And Billyboy’s message for Robert Irwin on dancing with the stars. Kinda unroyal if you ask me!

      • Lurker says:

        Weren’t C&C also on Eastenders? I recall Charles being the weatherman for BBC at one time, and wasn’t there a skit about how to say “To be or not to be that is the question” where he delivered his version? Which was actually funny and shows that Harry inherited his acting talent partially from his father.

        Let’s not forget the Queen and James Bond for the opening of the Olympics, and her meeting with Paddington Bear.

        As for “Trump will revoke Harry’s visa”. No he won’t. And there is an easy way around it. Pay 1 million $ for a “golden visa”. No questions asked. Available for everyone, thanks to Trump.

      • Deborah1 says:

        Yes, C&C had a cameo role on the British soap EastEnders. Camilla is allegedly a fan of EE. Charles also appeared in an episode of The Repair Shop hosted by Jay Blades who was later sacked for inappropriate behaviour towards women. The British royals have appeared in TV shows many times.

      • Sunniside up says:

        Charles reading his book The old man of Lochnagah on children’s television.

    • Me at home says:

      Yep, the tabloids reported breathlessly on Bulliam’s “poor me”interview with Eugene Levy.

  16. Becks1 says:

    Harry killed it on Colbert. He walked out to a standing ovation, and by the end the audience couldn’t stop laughing and cheering. That’s why they’re so upset. Harry looked natural and at ease and also showed that he has a solid friend with Colbert – he doesn’t invite people he dislikes on for things like that.

    (something I’ve noticed is that men who adore their wives seem to love Harry. Stephen for example has his wife Evie on a pedestal. I think its because Harry as a person aside, they can imagine what they would do if their wives were being treated like she was and they approve of him for trying to protect her.)

    Stephen only apologized for the affair jokes because he thought it was insensitive with the cancer announcement – and I’m sure KP called and complained. He has no love for the royals.

    • Amy Bee says:

      We all know that if this was William doing this skit the British press would be praising him to high heaven.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Becks, ITA, plus they all know that William could never be that charming or charismatic in ANY situation. He never gets standing ovations anywhere, ever. And I always laugh when I remember the photos of all of those crowd control procedures put in place before some of William’s engagements, only for like three people to show up.

    • jais says:

      Maybe we’ll see a future show with Harry and Colbert on Netflix lol. Or a one-off comedy special featuring the two of them. They’ve got a good vibe. I’d love to see Colbert take Harry to an improv workshop. Harry is already good but seeing him in an improv space would be amazing.

  17. Giddy says:

    How very terrible for the left behind royals to see Harry being casual, charismatic, and charming on an American television show. That audience loved him, and it was painfully obvious that the boo’s were for Trump. That writer should be concentrating on what’s going on in his own country with a charmless, lazy prince who will be the next king. That should be the story that creates outrage, not the image of the prince who got away from the racists in his family and the press.

    • Chrissy says:

      This! Harry is loving his life in The US, so let him be! Their obsession with Harry and his family is deranged! Surely the Brits should be focusing on the Left-Behinds, and worrying about their slacker POW!

  18. Lover says:

    Yet another lie told in their ever evolving fantasy about the Sandringham summit. Meghan didn’t agree to s**t at the summit, she wasn’t even there.

  19. Me at home says:

    Sykes’ only real insider gossip is William’s incandescence; apart from that, Sykes doesn’t have a clue what’s going on with the royals. Thus, Sykes’ overall MO is ragebait and clickbait about the Sussexes, because he’s apparently concluded that that’s the most lucrative way to boost Substack subscriptions (good luck with all those foreign bots, although I guess they have to pay him to post). Sykes seems proud to write, “I have led reporting that William has been considering this step [removing the titles]; after last night, I think that window has become a doorway.” Sure, pal.

    • Julia says:

      Surely the public must be bored with these same sad talking points by now. Willing will remove the Sussex titles for ‘reasons’! OK, does anyone care at this point? Harry will still be Diana’s son and the son of King Charles. You can’t erase that. It’s getting as boring as Trump will definitely deport Harry, trust me bro!

      • Me at home says:

        A few in the media seem to have tired of the “William is incandescent” narrative. Or maybe they’re legit worried about the future king’s perpetual incandescence–Jobson sure sounds worried.

        As for Sykophant, his business model seems to be churning out ragebait so he can reel in those $5/month Substack subscriptions from the Waleses’ bot farms in Lahore or Delhi or wherever, plus a handful of real people. Sykes seems untroubled by questions about journalistic integrity or who—or what—is actually paying him.

  20. B says:

    They’ll be screaming “take the titles” when Harry is 80 because he went viral for a making a joke about being a sexy grandpa.

  21. B says:

    They’ll be screaming “take the titles” when Harry is 80 because he went viral for a making a joke about being a sexy grandpa.

  22. Aimee says:

    Go ahead and take the stupid titles!!! He’ll always be known and called PRINCE Harry. William can’t change that!

  23. Sunniside up says:

    So a few jokes, even agreeing with what Trump has said is worse than being involved in trafficking minors for sex.

  24. Amy Bee says:

    These people are unhinged. What’s the difference between what Harry did and the skits that the Queen did when she was alive. At this point I think stripping Harry of his title will do the opposite of what the British press think will happen.

  25. Mads says:

    Sykes has gone full deranger; he was always in William’s camp and, for a very brief time, did some truthful reporting on Charles’ health and the shenanigans around Andrew “giving up” his titles but now the pretence that he’s anything but a Sussex hater has been purposely stripped away.

    His core subscribers detest Harry and Meghan, and some are hard core nut jobs who think Archie and Lily don’t exist and he’s playing to that crowd.

    He had his sister, Plum Sykes, on a live stream to discuss Meghan’s Bazaar cover and she was commenting on what a coup it was for all concerned and that the shoot was good, well that set his followers off and they were slamming her in the comments – as they do for anyone even saying balanced opinions regarding M & H – so he did another live stream, alone, where he sat and basically ripped apart his sister’s take and put forth his own ridiculous opinion on how it was a loss/ultimately bad PR for Meg. The guy is bonkers.

  26. Mina_Esq says:

    Harry will always be a prince, even if they strip his titles. Haters gonna hate, but Diana will always be his mum.

  27. QuiteContrary says:

    I can’t wait for Harry to make a cameo appearance on a Hallmark movie (please let this happen).

    The video of Harry and Stephen ice-skating is comedy gold.

    Poor Syko — he’s going to have a rage stroke one of these days, because Harry and Meghan will keep winning.

  28. Nerd says:

    Then the royals who hire and work with former Tory politicians should have their titles removed as well as the royals who host end of year parties for right leaning (Tory) media. The ones who take money from right wing media who have attacked their family members (Diana, Harry and Meghan) and continue with right wing propaganda should have their titles removed. Are they not being political by leaning to the right in who they choose to hire and align with in the media?

  29. tamsin says:

    I think Charles participated in some drama productions when he was attending Cambridge. I think Edward did as well. We’ve stories of The Queen, Harry’s granny, and her sister acting out skits when they were teens. Seems like the Windsors do like doing acting bits, so Harry comes by it honestly. The skit was merry! Love that Harry is poking fun at himself at the same time.

  30. Elly says:

    The BM are obviously deranged with jealousy because America’s Gingerbread Prince has all the charm and personality compared to the Prince they’re stuck with.

  31. Sean says:

    Sykes columns have been purposely pushing crazy ideas to provoke eyeballs and clicks for his more looney readers.
    He completely missed critical comments on the chocolate release, grainy, burnt, but I expect them, as Trump would say, in the next several weeks.

  32. L4Frimairel says:

    These people are sounding more cuckoo each day. The main reason they want those titles removed is because people still like and respect Harry and Meghan has the title by being married to Harry.

  33. Beverley says:

    Watching attractive and confident Prince Harry delight the Late Show audience must be a real nightmare for Pegs and his staff. The Other Brother will never be so comfortable in his own skin, American audiences famously boo him, he’ will NEVER look so sexy, and absolutely nothing can be done about his lack of charisma.

    The whole world can clearly see who the superior brother is, and it must be a huge thorn in useless William’s side.

  34. mightymolly says:

    “You elected a King” is absolutely savage. It’s not that I ever doubted Harry & Meghan’s political leanings, but dayum to come out swinging live that. I love them so much.

  35. CM says:

    I truly wish they would make up their minds about whether Prince Harry matters or not. 99% of the time they’re claiming nobody cares what he says or what he does and now it turns into a political incident?

    He does not in any way represent the Royal Family. He is a private citizen who happens to be the son of a King and Princess Diana. He can say whatever the hell he wants.

    And it was funny!!!

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment