People: Princess Kate ‘is being treated as an expert on early childhood’

There are several royal stories out at the end of 2025 which function as “year-end reviews” plus “goals for 2026.” Almost all of them are from Kensington Palace. The problem is that the Prince and Princess of Wales had an exceptionally lazy year, even by their own pitiful standards. Some of the highlights included: skipping the VJ Day 80th anniversary event; skipping the BAFTAs to go on vacation in Mustique; Kate suddenly withdrawing from Ascot at the last minute; going on no fewer than four ski vacations; taking a lengthy summer holiday; borrowing some mega-yacht to sail around Greece; moving into their fifth forever home which included a 150-acre land-grab of public parkland; and William & Kate’s embarrassing and obvious busy-work flurry during Harry’s September visit to the UK. But of course we’ll never get that kind of cold, accurate assessment from the royalists. Instead, they’re trying to turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse. Did you know that Kate’s Early Years busywork is the most important thing ever, and she’s obviously a credible expert in the field? From People Magazine:

Kate’s Early Years essay: At the center is her work for early childhood, and she signaled how she is at the heart of the debate when she paired with Professor Robert Waldinger of Harvard University for an essay on the subject — putting her “at the red-hot center of one of the great social policy issues of our time,” tackling the issue of screentime, Sally Bedell Smith, who pens the Royals Extra Substack, says.

Kate’s argument that smartphones are bad for kids: Bedell Smith believes the Princess of Wales “is doing something concrete — she is using the resources of her [Centre for Early Childhood] foundation to fund studies that are going to help identify the issues and where the insufficiencies are and find how parents can be helped, especially with these digital challenges that are overwhelming a lot of parents.”

Kate’s keen Business Taskforce: Bedell Smith adds, “I thought her speech to the business leaders was very compelling and indicative of the depth that she has studied this issue, which means a great deal to her.” Adds one of King Charles’ biographers, Catherine Mayer: “She is being treated as an expert on early childhood. People feel she is genuinely contributing to that area.”

[From People]

“She is being treated as an expert on early childhood.” Notice they’re NOT saying “she IS an expert on early childhood.” They’re pleased that she’s being treated as an expert when she so clearly is not. “People feel she is genuinely contributing to that area.” Again, no one is saying she’s genuinely contributed anything to anyone, but Mayer argues that “people FEEL” that Kate has contributed. It’s curious that they’re still trying to make the bloody Early Years thing stick because for most of the year, Kate was doing nothing with her stupid foundation. Kate was more focused on her idiotic Mother Nature videos, remember? But yes, some staffers coauthored an essay in Kate’s name and she once again hosted a business taskforce on business and early years like a top CEO. The bar has been set in hell for Kate for more than a decade. You’d never believe that Kate is a nearly 44-year-old college-educated woman who has supposedly been listening and learning to childhood development experts for the past seven years.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

26 Responses to “People: Princess Kate ‘is being treated as an expert on early childhood’”

  1. What is with all this embiggening of the lazy mean girl? Why are they trying to sell this crap. We can see with our own eyes and hear with our own ears that she is anything but in expert in early years. You can put all the lipstick in the world on a pig but it is still a pig.

    • ClammanderJen says:

      Remember when Ivanka tried to sidle up to actual world leaders at the G20 and everyone basically edged away from her? Yeah. Same vibe here. Nepotism and cronyism can get you in the room, and centuries of corruption can prop you up — but none of that earns real respect.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      Why does this foundation’s initiatives sound useless, late for lunch every time? The big announcement is she’s gonna fund research to help identify the issues with screen time and where are the insufficiencies with screentime and find how parents can be helped? Don’t we already know????? Do something that will actually help gurl. But ok, she prefers to just fund research so she actually doesn’t have to really do something while pretending to do something, and we already have all the answers to the research… The business people must be bored out of their minds. Thesus questions of elementary school grade 3.

  2. Jais says:

    I’d forgotten about the flurry of busy work when Harry was in town. So are we gonna get some early childhood flurries come mid January when Harry’s DM court case starts? Oh joy.

    • Amy Bee says:

      I’d be surprised if William or Kate come out during Harry’s case against the DM. I think they will hide away so the British press can concentrate on demonising Harry in the papers and TV.

  3. 7Lala11_7 says:

    Let me tell you why I will ALWAYS have BEEF 😠 with Prince William’s Wife….I didn’t care that she’s lazy & trifling…that’s par for the course for people like HER! But the FACT that she showed her WHOLE FLAT ASS 🫨 the SECOND a BLACK (yea…I’m using the “one drop” rule because THAT is what society does 😠) comes on the scene eating Kate’s 🤬 ass FA LUNCH with her achievements since GRAMMAR SCHOOL?

    I don’t COTTON to that BS 🤬 because in my 35+ years working in corporate 🇺🇲…I RARELY had to worry about White Men coming for me professionally by “any means necessary”😱….

    It was the WHITE WOMEN…who should have been my ALLY fighting the toxic masculinity whose STINK permeates EVERY ELEMENT OF LIFE coming for my throat in ways that has left an indelible mark 😒!

    And THAT’S why I will ALWAYS have time to remark on Princeess Kate when she’s ONCE AGAIN…given accolades for 🤬 she COULD TRULY GIVE AF ABOUT…but could NEVA be bothered 😬😮😕

    • Me at home says:

      Kate’s a royal racist and a mean girl for sure, no disagreement here. Also, Meghan put Kate to shame with her work ethic: the Grenfell cookbook, several successful overseas tours (unlike the Waleses’ Caribbean utter disaster), and initial popularity. And Meghan is, gasp, American. Can’t have the spare Sussexes eclipsing the lazy heir and wife, especially not an industrious black woman eclipsing a lazy British rose, so the Sussexes had to be bullied out.

  4. Sunniside up says:

    Kate was only interested in early years when her own children were little, until of course she had to direct attention away from her holidays when they suddenly reared their heads again. Or was it Harry getting too much attention from Charlie.

    • Honeyhoney says:

      I can’t remember which initiative Meghan did – maybe the cookbook? Around then, since M was doing lot, Peggy’s boyfriend, Jase came up with the early years pie chart and the photo ops to make it look like Kate was doing something. Or it could have been before the Oprah interview, I can’t remember. It’s never been an actual interest, just busy work competing with Meghan.

  5. Tarte Au Citron says:

    Obviously not a 1:1 comparison, but this article led me down a rabbithole of how Elena Ceaucescu was lauded to the hilt as a leading scientist. Only thing was Elena was terrible at school, never actually did a thesis, but she wanted the prestige & respect of being a professor. Nobody was going to push back on the dictator’s wife and went along with indulging her 😏

  6. Amy Bee says:

    I get the sense that Kate is trying to pivot away from early childhood to the issue of protecting children from the dangers of smart phones. The latter is much more trendy and gets more attention than calling on more support for parents and children under 5. It will be interesting to see what she does next year.

  7. Me at home says:

    Kate almost certainly paid that Harvard prof. I’ve worked at two not-for-profits that paid Harvard and other Ivy profs to do original research for us and write it up. Prices vary dramatically, but $100k will get you some original research, which Kate’s thing was not. The money pays for research assistants, data gathering, a cut for the prof, admin, etc. Kate clearly didn’t pay for new research so she paid much less.

    IOW, it’s not like that Harvard prof called up Kate and said “let’s collaborate,” unless he saw the paper as being good for his own status. It was a transaction, and a cheap transaction at that.

    • Tessa says:

      Keen probably wrote early years are important so she can say she contributed. I think The real experts should complain

      • Me at home says:

        If Kate paid for the report, the professor would have had to take her suggestions seriously—unless they were outright wrong (which, to be fair, some may have been). Either way, she owns the final report and can do whatever she likes with it.

      • Me at home says:

        Also, who are we kidding. The prof is lucky if Kate read his piece. She probably gave it to her Early Years staff, who insisted on adding just enough language (“aahly yaahs are important”) to claim co-authorship. Co-authorship was probably in the contract, but anyway, it’s standard in these academic contracts for paid lead researchers to have to accept reasonable suggestions from the entity that hired them. We used to have contract language that we joked would curl professors’ hair, almost implying we owned them and all their future research, but in fact it wasn’t that bad, and we never enforced it anyway.

  8. wolfmamma says:

    BTW – did we get a winter seasonal
    Video? lol.., I don’t recall

    As for her early childhood expertise…. Please.. I graduated in 1968 with a Bachelor’s in Early Childhood education and remember more than Lazy Waity has ever “publisher” on the subject..
    Does she have any idea what an embarrassment she is?

    • Jensa says:

      Any day now. I reckon, for the Winter video.

      To distract from the fact that they’re on their first ski holiday of the new year.

    • Me at home says:

      I’m curious, where were the four 2025 ski vacations? I knew about Switzerland in January and Courcheval in March or April. I totally don’t question they took two more ski trips, but where were those?

  9. Tessa says:

    Bedell slammed the late Diana then fawns all over keen for her fake expertise in child psychology. Disgraceful. And an insultbti real experts who did actual research papers and studies.

  10. Tessa says:

    Not using cell phones is not keens idea. Many public services announcements are out there for years about kids not allowed excessive cell phone use

  11. Aurora says:

    People has been over the top pushing the Keens. They have nearly daily features on People’s Insta trying to make them happen.

  12. Harla says:

    In the pictures of Kate at Early Years events most people are going along, smiling and looking thrilled but there’s always one person who looks like they are desperately trying not to roll their eyes, when I spot that person I always chuckle.

  13. Nic919 says:

    Catherine Quinn came up with the idea for Kate to pretend to care about young kids before she left with a swiftness when her two year contract ended. The original idea called broken Britain was tossed out in a Becky English article on the Friday before Meghan launched the Grenfell tower cookbook. (Sept 2018)

    So let us not forget that Kate did not ever give a shit about kids in the 7 years before Meghan showed up and needed something to try and hijack Meghan’s completed cookbook project for the fire survivors.

  14. Tessa says:

    Ironic all the praise of keen by Sally Smith who gaslit Diana and made up a fake diagnosis that Diana had borderline personality disorder. Obviously she would applaud keen being a fake expert on early childhood

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment