Myers: Prince William argued for Prince Andrew’s banishment since 2019

The Daily Mirror’s royal editor Russell Myers has written a royal book, this one called William & Catherine: The Intimate Inside Story. There’s been some buzz about this book for the past month or so, like people thought Myers would actually reveal something major about the Prince and Princess of Wales. Judging from the first excerpt, which was published in the Mirror on Friday, this isn’t going to dish about what’s *really* going on in Camp Keen. It’s more like…80% William and Kate’s narratives, with 20% pushback from King Charles’s courtiers. The first excerpt is all about how William has boldly argued for years that Prince Andrew should have been kicked out of the royal family, basically since the Newsnight debacle in November 2019. Some highlights from the book excerpt:

After Andrew’s 2019 Newsnight interview: In the aftermath, William spoke to his father to implore him and the Queen to take immediate action, fearing not only the public backlash but for his own future. A source said: “Once you understand the fact that everything that happens in the here and now, affects everything in the future, William’s future, it is very easy to put yourself in his shoes. He never much liked his uncle and wanted him out of the picture immediately before the rot further set in. William’s view was that he [Andrew] got himself into the whole mess, so he should be left to his own devices to sort it out away from the family.”

When Andrew & Sarah Ferguson were invited to Christmas at Sandringham in 2023: In a clear sign of his wish for further harmony in his family, Charles invited his former sister-in-law, Sarah, Duchess of York, to join the royal family and walk alongside her ex-husband Prince Andrew to church at Sandringham. It would be the first time she had participated in this tradition in 32 years. The King’s decision to bring his brother back into the family fold was an issue William fundamentally disagreed with, to such a degree that he challenged Charles directly. A source with knowledge of the conversation said that William was “very much put in his place”, and that while he did not agree with the view that Andrew’s exile should be limited, he did not provoke his father further.

William always hated Andrew: William’s negative view of his uncle Andrew had predated the Duke of York’s fall from grace. For years the Prince of Wales had questioned what benefit his uncle was to the wider operation. “Long before he was embroiled in the scandal [involving Virginia Giuffre], he’d always thought his uncle was a bit of an ignoramus”, a palace source revealed. “He would question ‘what does he actually do?’ But it was more than that. He’d seen how Andrew behaved in front of staff, ordering people about, the aggressive or dismissive manner, they’d never seen eye to eye. William has a relationship with his cousins [Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie] … so he takes no umbrage with them, but there’s no love lost for Andrew or Sarah.”

William was always overruled by Charles: “In an alternate dimension Andrew probably thought there would be a way back into public life if the scandal or the headlines died down, but it would have always had to be while his brother was King. William didn’t think either of them [Andrew or Sarah] should be anywhere near the family, publicly or otherwise, but he was overruled by his father.”

A stain on the family: [In 2024], William again implored the King to act: to strip Andrew of his titles and banish him from the family for good in order to protect the reputation of the institution. While Andrew had always vehemently denied the allegations, both publicly and privately to his family, one palace source close to William said: “The Prince of Wales was adamant the whole episode would never go away and, despite how others may have felt, there was absolutely no upside in Andrew being protected. His view was crystal clear, Andrew shouldn’t be anywhere near the family under any circumstances, not by association, not at family functions, anywhere. Every single time there was a new revelation, which no one knew when it was coming or what the next one would be, it was a stain on all of the family.”

Will & Kate were united in hating Andrew: William and Catherine’s personal view has been that their best option is to keep their distance from the source of the problem. They knew that the disturbing claims of sexual abuse that have pursued Andrew for more than a decade, allegations he has always vehemently denied, had permanently damaged him in the public’s eyes. And his now famous BBC Newsnight interview, where he failed to apologise for his connection to Epstein, or acknowledge the victims of sexual abuse, was, for William and Catherine, terminal for their relationship with him.

[From The Daily Mirror]

The only thing in here which slightly surprised me was the part about William being “very much put in his place” regarding Andrew and Sarah being invited to Christmas at Sandringham. That was also the excuse William’s people used when William and Kate chauffeured Andrew to church at Balmoral in 2023 – that William had been “ordered” to do so by his father, and that Charles put William in his place as heir or something. I mean, multiple things can be true here – Charles led the charge for Andrew and Sarah to be brought in from the “cold” in 2023-24, despite many warnings. I also believe that William has probably argued for some time that Andrew should be banished, although I doubt that started after the Newsnight interview – at that time (circa 2019-2020), William was much more focused on banishing HIS brother. In fact, the Windsors were widely in favor of using Prince Harry and Meghan as distractions from Andrew’s depravity and lies. You can’t tell the story of “how the royals have covered up Andrew’s long-standing degeneracy” without telling the story of how Harry and Meghan were treated from 2018-2020.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images. Book cover courtesy of Amazon.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

33 Responses to “Myers: Prince William argued for Prince Andrew’s banishment since 2019”

  1. Tessa says:

    What a bad picture if them on the book cover she with the blonde wig and he with the scruffy beard. I think he railed against Andrew to clear a path to taking the Sussex titles . And Sarah was asked to royal events to show harry and Meghan that they were not welcome but Andrew and his ex fergie were.

    • Kittenmom says:

      Such a terrible picture. I love it for them, lol.

    • Sunshine says:

      I was literally coming to say the same thing. The wig takes center stage.

    • Me at home says:

      Right? If this is the best picture the publishing company could come up with of this pair looking “loved up,” it’s a pretty sad indictment. I remember this picture, and we were all trying to decide if he was chewing her out or being nice to her. I guess they decided a side profile was better than him gritting his teeth at the camera.

  2. Christine says:

    The more I look at it in retrospect, the more stunning it is that they used Harry and Meghan as cover for Andrew. A degenerate, middle aged man was protected, at the expense of the charismatic, ACTUAL do-gooders, who would have provided decades of good publicity. For worthless Andrew, and the fatally lazy Waleses. It’s amazingly shortsighted.

    • Me at home says:

      Didn’t Rose Hanbury rumors also first surface in 2019 (per Lownie) before blowing up in 2024? And yes, the Sussexes outshone the Waleses in so many respects, that that could be allowed. So many reasons to distract by demonizing the Sussexes, first with bad press when they were still in the UK, and then x100 after they left.

  3. Tis True, Tis True says:

    Of course he did! William has always wanted the banishment of everyone in the Royal Family who isn’t William. They take rightful attention away from the Heir.

    I really fear for those children once they start stepping out on their own, and are more than silent little ones serving to increase the glory of their father.

  4. Yes Peg wanted him banished because he wanted Royal Lodge. He had no problem having his “hated Uncle Pedo in the plane to get to the dead Queen and he had no problem driving Uncle Pedo (with a big smile on his face) to a Christmas event? Peg wants to come out smelling like a rose with this but he stinks just as much as the rest of the Pedo loving family.

  5. Lala11_7 says:

    Please…I want Prince Williams to keep talking about Andrew while folks keep talking about his Sultan partner who gifted POS Epstein with torture 😱….

    Deplorable & inhumane to the MAX!😠

  6. Jais says:

    Sorry, no. William is not some hero who tried to stand up against Andrew. He’s just not. He included him on that plane ride to Balmoral. He drove him to church. At the end of the day, it does fall on the late queen and Charles the most. But no William cannot be painted as some beacon of shining light in the Andrew situation.

    • Yvette says:

      I recall Charles being on an overseas royal trip when Andrew’s televised interview was aired. He was apparently unhappy and cut the trip short. It was only after he returned to the UK that the Queen took action against Andrew.

      I believe William was too involved in egging the British media on in the campaign to drive Meghan out of the UK at that time to have given any thought at all to Andrew.

  7. Tuesday says:

    I don’t think it started in 2019, but I do believe William has wanted Andrew banished since 2021 or so. And I believe that Charles insisted on the Waleses taking Andrew to church. I don’t doubt that W hates Andrew and all the yorks, even if he doesn’t actually care about what Andrew did.

  8. MSJ says:

    “When Andrew & Sarah Ferguson were invited to Christmas at Sandringham in 2023: In a clear sign of his wish for further harmony in his family, Charles invited his former sister-in-law, Sarah, Duchess of York, to join the royal family and walk alongside her ex-husband Prince Andrew to church at Sandringham…..The King’s decision to bring his brother back into the family fold was an issue William fundamentally disagreed with, to such a degree that he challenged Charles directly.”

    2023 was the year Spare was published and the book with all its truths was a global success. The Windsors united against Prince Harry. They evicted the Sussexes from Frogmore Cottage. William and Kate had their sources brief reporters that they prefer Prince Andrew as their neighbor rather than Harry and Meghan. Therefore, I don’t believe this contradictory narrative that William challenged Charles regarding Andrew. As usual, they are trying to rewrite history with another book by another sycophantic royal reporter. 🤷🏽‍♀️

  9. Amy Bee says:

    I don’t believe any of this. Actions speak louder than words. Plus Myers doesn’t really reveal any new information here.

  10. Tessa says:

    More fiction about scooter. He kept harry away from the plane to Balmoral after the queen died but made sure Andrew got on the plane.

  11. Hypocrisy says:

    I call 🐂 💩 on Willy screaming to banish AMW he was always far to busy screaming about his brother and brothers family than he ever did about his uncle and now we see that all those rage briefings were to protect his child raping uncle, and his own involvement with those people taking blood money for his charities and holidays. I still remember that the Wales preferred to live close to AMW rather than Meghan that says everything you ever need to know about them.

  12. Blujfly says:

    …. so he was fine with the state of affairs before the interview but since the interview was a disaster and he never much liked him anyway it was time for the Queen to act to protect William on the throne, 2 people away at the time.

    He doesn’t care what Andrew did. He wants the path cleared for himself and his family and them only. And the second anyone becomes a difficulty to him they’re gone.

  13. Beverley says:

    That cover is god awful! Were they even in the same room together? He looks like he wore that to bed and her jacket is so ill fitting. That wig and her shirt make her look particularly disheveled. I think the author, editors, and publisher think very little of WanK.

  14. Eurydice says:

    So interesting that William was “very much put in his place” by Charles with regard to Andrew, but Charles didn’t have a word to say about William’s constant public attacks on Harry and Meghan.

  15. Joanne says:

    My favourite part is when it says William asks “what does he actually do” and talks about how Andrew behaves aggressively and is dismissively of staff. Look in the mirror Willy, irony has died. What does Willy actually do?

    • MSJ says:

      This book is making the Windsors look more stupid than ever before. A set of lazy immoral privileged people throwing their weight around.

    • First comment says:

      I was coming here to say the same thing: he wondered ” what does he actually do”? LOL. What do you actually do, William?

    • Jay says:

      Lol, wasn’t “but what does [she] DO?” once asked by the Queen about Kate, before she was engaged to William?

  16. Monika says:

    So in 2019 Willi was concerned about the backlash of uncle Andrew’s Newsnight interview for the royal family, especially for his (Willi’s) future. Nothing about the victims. What happened with “thoughts are focused on the victims”?
    As always with the British royal family it is all about themselves.

    I am getting whiplash with all the contradictions about William and Andrew. Willi and Kate wanted Andrew out of the royal family to defend for himself since 2019 but at the same time Willi and Kate could not leave uncle Andrew completely in the cold because Willi and Kate are allegedly concerned about uncle Andrew’s mental health, not the mental health of the victims.
    Apparently Willi and Kate did not want anything to do with uncle Andrew, Willi chauffeured uncle Andrew to the church under duress, but in 2023 it was said that Willi and Kate would prefer uncle Andrew as their neighbour rather than Harry and Meghan. This was plastered all over the front pages of the British tabloids. I am wondering who briefed this.
    At least since after Charles cancer diagnosis there are voices saying that there is a power shift in the royal family from Charles to Willi and that Willi is actually calling the shots but Willi was put in his place by Charles, the last time apparently in 2024. Choose a lane!

    • First comment says:

      Imagine having someone in your family who committed such serious crimes and the only thing you care about is the impact of his actions on you and your image. This is who William is : an image and very fake on that.

  17. YankeeDoodles says:

    Epstein is just another Rorschach blot on the body politic, no pun intended. People saw what they wanted to see, or what they were primed to see: the Goldman Sachs lady lawyer who was Obama’s White House Counsel saw an older wiser man who gave her lots of freebies and wanted nothing in exchange. She conveniently forgot that Epstein had been convicted of soliciting prostitution of a minor the same year that Obama was elected, before she began practicing law on behalf of the White House. ….Larry Summers, the president of Harvard, saw a moneybags donor, with deep pockets, who wanted nothing in exchange, except what every donor wants… access, prestige, reflected glory. Etc. Andrew saw deep pockets and girls and a pimp who never charged him for his services. Everyone who had a reason not to see what was right in front of them, saw nothing. People who had no ulterior agenda saw it plain as day. Melinda French — the only heroic figure in this story — saw it in Gladwellian fashion, blink once and trust your gut. God bless Melinda. She is truly righteous. And I’m guessing her work advocating for women and girls in underdeveloped countries was a triggering experience, in itself. I’m sure being the mother of girls of the same age as Epstein’s victims was a whole other trigger as well. But more fundamentally, she had no reason *not* to see it. This story has just exposed the rot underneath so much transactional mercenary trafficking in influence and connections that passes for “elite” backscratching. Harry had to build an entire logistical and financial infrastructure around Invictus. That took some doing. He learned how to work with the world as it is, and he didn’t need to rely on some godfather moneybags dirtbag. So he didn’t get sucked in.

  18. First comment says:

    I’m old enough to remember William laughing with his uncle outside the church (?) after the memorial service of the duchess (of Kent?). I’m old enough to remember that he took his uncle on the plane after the Queen’s death. I’m old enough to remember William and his uncle in the car. And please, don’t tell me that Charles pushed him to accept Andrew. I still have the image of William ranting in front of the Queen and everyone (including Charles) couldn’t calm him during the summit with Harry after his decision to leave the firm. Charles doesn’t have any power on William. He always did as he liked.

  19. QuiteContrary says:

    Cleanup in Aisle W!

    None of this is going to make William look any better now that he has his own Epstein scandal.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      Thank you for the link, that’s a good one and absolutely right.. it’s time for the shame to change and fall on the predators/criminals like AMW and all of the others involved and those that protected them.

  20. Jay says:

    Oof. “I knew full well what an awful, depraved criminal my uncle was, but it wasn’t until he did a poorly-received interview in TV that I started to worry about how his actions would affect ME and MY reputation. I wanted to be rid of him but my dad said no, and as a hugely privileged, independently wealthy adult I didn’t want to stand up for what was right, so I just did what was easy instead. I was just following orders! For years!”

    This little attempt at rewriting history could actually be quite damaging. In trying to take the heat off of himself and throwing Charles under the bus instead, William is admitting that he knew about Andrew’s “problems” and yet stayed silent for years.

    If he thinks people will congratulate him for his heroic stance, I think it’s a grave miscalculation. And you know that Charles and Camilla’s sources are not going to let this be.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment