Telegraph: The palace should find a ‘way back’ for Prince Harry & Meghan

One particular thing happens whenever the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are enjoying a successful moment: after days of scandalized tantrums from the British press, someone will say something along the lines of “man, I really wish Prince Harry and Meghan were still working royals.” There’s rarely an acknowledgement of why they left in the first place, nor has there ever been an acknowledgement that the British establishment stripped the Sussexes of their security in early 2020 specifically to harm them to the point of divorce or capitulation. But whenever Meg and Harry are having a good moment, you can see the wistfulness set in among royal commentators. What could have been, had those royalists not been stenographers to an abusive, racist, white-supremacist institution. Well, the Sussexes’ successful Jordanian trip has the Telegraph’s Rowan Pelling in her feelings. She wrote an eye-rolly column: “Harry and Meghan’s Jordan trip shows what an asset they could have been.” Six years later and they’re still crying about a situation they facilitated and cheered for. An excerpt:

Watching the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on their World Health Organization (WHO) arranged visit to Jordan this week, I found myself humming an homage to John Lennon: “Imagine there’s no Megxit, it’s easy if you try.”

As I looked at photos of the duo visiting refugees and a rehabilitation centre for addicts, I couldn’t help but be reminded of when the pre-bust-up couple radiated down-to-earth sympathy and cheer with a generous dose of Hollywood glamour. I was certainly part of the cohort who thought the unstuffy, ex-Army prince and his gorgeous, bright starlet wife were a breath of fresh air in a sometimes over-staid family.

And now I’m feeling a swell of nostalgia for that honeymoon period with the Sussexes. In the wake of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s disgrace and the inevitable tarnishing effect on his poor daughters, members of the family who are divorced from the scandal have never felt so welcome. However regrettable the tell-all memoir and Oprah interview, it’s hard to deny that when Harry and Meghan do a walkabout and chat to people who have suffered, they have the public touch.

My husband, who has little truck with the royals in general, feels great sympathy for Harry and not just because they’re both from uptight, armed services families and lost their mothers when they were little boys. A shared sense of suffering is certainly part of it, but what he really loves is the Duke’s sense of fun. Around five times a year my spouse says apropos of nothing, “a great loss” – then I find he’s reading a story about the Sussexes.

My sons, who are part of the TikTok generation, also feel warmly towards them while not giving a hoot (or even recognising) any other Windsor. It often feels to me that, like Heineken, Harry refreshes the parts other Windsors cannot reach. He has his mother’s easy charm and playfulness, which William – burdened by the Crown, worries over his wife’s and father’s health, and the pressure of raising a family in the public eye – can find hard to manifest.

You sense that the Sussexes are also deeply aware of what’s been forfeited in their impetuous departure. Why else the regular, dutiful, quasi-royal visits to Colombia, Nigeria, Canada and Jordan – often in the cause of the Invictus Games – that studiously emulate the kind of trips they took when still part of the Firm?

Whatever your view on the matter, it’s ironic that at the very moment when even loyal souls question the Royal family’s remit, funding, veil of secrecy and questionable advisers, the couple who most appeal to republicans and outsiders exist in what appears to be permanent exile. If they were still part of the Firm, this would be the moment to deploy them. Indeed, a canny courtier would pack the duo off to visit women’s shelters and charities that combat sex trafficking as a riposte to the cynics who think the Windsors don’t give a damn. And an epic family reconciliation could knock Andrew off the front pages. You may call me a dreamer, but… could the Palace blue-sky thinkers find a path back for Harry and Meghan?

[From The Telegraph]

This is a delusion: that Harry & Meghan secretly want to “come back” and the only thing that’s stopping them is King Charles and Prince William’s refusal. While it’s true that Charles and William would throw the biggest tantrums ever if the Sussexes “came back” to live in the UK, what everyone is missing is that the Sussexes have repeatedly said that they live in America now. They’re not moving. Harry wants protection… to VISIT. To visit his father and do charity work. Harry wants to bring his children over so they can spend time with their grandfather. That’s it. All of these convoluted, idiotic commentary pieces about “bring back the Sussexes” and “Harry will eventually have a rival royal court in England” miss the simple fact that Harry and Meghan do not want to live in that sh-tshow anymore. Besides which, they already have a rival royal court and it’s in Montecito. That’s what is driving all of these people crazy.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Telegraph: The palace should find a ‘way back’ for Prince Harry & Meghan”

  1. sara says:

    deranged behavior to think that they want to come back. also insane to write this the same day dan wooton is “leaking” how mike tindall hates meghan.

    https://x.com/amanda_d39608/status/2027160357450420508

    may meghan never have to spend time with those people ever again.

  2. Dee(2) says:

    So basically please come back so we can take advantage of your labor, and use you to our benefit with no apparent upside to you? The wild thing is that this was obvious to everyone in January of 2020.

    You knew what hard workers they were, even if you also knew that petty jealousies and rivalries were driving their departure. It would have made way more sense at the time to let them be half in and out and put all the restrictions you could think on approving what you considered half out. And you could determine when and how much they were needed for” half in”. This was the bag fumble of all bag fumbles.

    Not that I would have wanted that for them, but that would have been the mercenary and smart thing to do if they were as bright as they imagine they are with their “platinum standard” courtiers. Instead you spent the last 6 years talking about snubs, them being out in the cold, how you’d rather live close to Andrew, how simply being in the presence of Meghan was the hardest thing you’ve ever done, how you’re not a bank, and all of the constant sniping that they made the wrong decision and they couldn’t come back. I love this for them.

    And Spare and the Oprah interview was regrettable for whom?

    Also, again equating doing charity work and caring about people with royalty. Everyone that does charity work does not long to be a working Royal. Your royals barely work, and they definitely don’t give their money. They need to try emulating the other people, not convince themselves that people are emulating them.

    • Jais says:

      The Oprah interview was not regrettable. What was truly regrettable was how the Sussexes were treated by the RF and the British press. Now that was a freaking travesty. Lying about Meghan making Kate cry. Please. The family nothing, not a word, when the BBC reporter compared their child to a monkey. Yeaaah. All that part got left out of the article.

  3. Tessa says:

    They won’t come back. These articles are tedious. Mike Tindall is a Trump fan. So obviously he will say bad things about Meghan.

  4. Mel says:

    What idiotic planet do these people live on where they think that only “royals” do charity work? They don’t want to come back, they just want them back because they finally figured out that Willard and Katt are not only lazy but boring as hell. Keep crying lady.

  5. Mslove says:

    If I were the Sussexes, I would not even visit that place. I would tell everyone there to kick rocks.

  6. MsIam says:

    This is bullshit. Remember when Meghan and Harry visited that organization that helped sex workers and Meghan wrote those supportive messages on the bananas? Oh how the media howled and called her names about that simple gesture. And you wonder why the Sussexes left and won’t come back. No, you are stuck with the royals you are left with because that’s what you wanted. So deal with it Britrags and enjoy!

    • kirk says:

      Cameltoe is on some kind of a Torygraph type podcast this morning where she’s laughing with some guy about the notes they wrote to people at the Jordanian treatment center. Then Cameltoe goes on to recall Sussexes helping after Los Angeles fire and being called “disaster tourists” by Justine Bateman. Looks to me like the Torygraph is doing just fine with their desired Sussex bashing from afar – they don’t need to move back to UK.

  7. Eurydice says:

    What is this story of happy-go-lucky Harry and Meghan? Wasn’t Meghan almost driven to self-harm? Didn’t they lose their home and security? Weren’t they pursued across continents? Didn’t they have to find their own income? Didn’t they lose a child? But it’s William who’s had all the burdens, right.

    And what is this about hypothetical visits by H&M to women’s shelters? That’s going to make the charges of sex trafficking and treason disappear? Talk about hypocrisy – the RF didn’t give a damn when H&M needed help, but now that the RF needs help…

  8. You can’t have back what YOU WERE ACTIVELY TRYING TO DESTROY AND MAKING LEAVE!!!!! Hind sight is always 20/20. You let your incredible jealous royal family use you to spread lies and information to make it unsafe for this charismatic couple who only wanted to use their platform for good things!!!!! These articles of want are too little and way too late! The charismatic couple have moved on and are doing their good things out on their own and have no wish or desire to return to the jealous fold of fools who wished them unsafe and dead!!

  9. LadyE says:

    I believe that Harry truly wants to reconcile with his father on a personal level and have a father-son relationship. So long as that is what he wants and he and Meghan are on the same page, I support his wishes.

    However, I think that there is a real delusion about whether the Sussexes would be “successful” if they actually had some sort of “half in/half out” role with the Royal Family. That delusion extends, yes, even here maybe more so among Sussex fans. The truth is that Harry and Meghan have had successful trips, particularly Nigeria, post-Sussexit ONLY because they left the Royal family. Harry and Meghan, just like Kate and William, would be confronted about the real issues and legacy of colonialism and empire, including slavery, the slave trade, reparations, the list goes on and on if they had stayed and been ‘working royals’. And they would have been protested, they would have had people ask pointed questions, all of it. They are not and would not have been exempt. Nor should they be if they were still representing the Crown.

    Yes, H&M had a successful Australia tour. And, yes, years ago, Harry had successful trips on behalf of his grandmother, but the lack of hard questions was due in part to his age and ‘fun’ reputation. I think Harry and Meghan are genuinely liked, but no one should have any doubts that they would have to speak on colonialism, the slave trade, reparations, all of it, and Would. Have. To. toe the government line in what they said. I think people would be very, very disappointed in how they would have addressed these issues if they had been able to negotiate a ‘half in/half out’ agreement. I have to point out that they certainly have not taken the opportunity to weigh in on these issues after they left…

    All to say that the idea that in 2026, H&M would be popular representing the RF is not true in my view. They would be just as open to criticism and critique on all the issues that the British government and Royal family have failed to address or remedy and they would not have a better answer or response than any other member of the Royal family to be blunt about it.

    • Jais says:

      Agree. One of the reasons the Sussexes look so good is bc they got out of there. If they were still there, they’d be getting critiqued left and right and thrown to the wolves to bolster the wales couple.

      • LadyE says:

        Exactly. There are really two very distinct lines here.

        One is about the actual competence, charisma, etc. of Harry and Meghan. On a superficial level, they would of course handle any number of situations better than the rest of the Royal family who are seemingly incapable of actually engaging with their “subjects” in a respectful, normal manner. And tied to this is the treatment of H&H by the rest of the Royal family and British media that uses them to distract from the lameness of the other Royals and to sell papers, for the media.

        But, the second line is quite different. It’s not about presentation, work ethic, public speaking skills, it’s about the actual substance of the history of the British monarchy and empire and colonialism. It’s the opposite of the first line. Not about personalities at all, but the actual institution they ALL represent. And that institution has perpetrated tremendous harm around the globe and has never been held to account or even apologized. And that is the official stance of the British government too (which is quite important to this issue).

        It’s no longer my main area of work, but I worked for many years in reparations and am very familiar with a number of African reparations advocates and the ongoing campaigns. The reparations campaign would not hold its punches, be more polite, not protest, not disrupt, etc. because it is Harry and Meghan and they are “nice” or “popular”. No no no. This is so not true and anyone with a passing understanding of these campaigns would know that. Anyone who represents the Crown will be targeted, will be called on to publicly support (FINANCIAL) reparations, apologies will be demanded. And that would include Harry and Meghan 100% if they were back in the Royal family in any official capacity. And, again, on this second line. They should be called out, protested, etc. just like any other representative of the institution.

      • Jais says:

        Well, we don’t know what they would have said and whether we would have disappointed. My agreement was in that if they were still there, I don’t know that it would be that beneficial. Every working royal in the monarchy would be looking bad for the associations with Andrew. And Harry and Meghan would continue to be scapegoated.

      • LadyE says:

        The messaging carried by the Royal family on reparations comes directly from the UK government, there’s not any leeway on the substance of the position only differences in how sympathetically it is expressed. But, the actual answer “NO. No apology. No reparations.” does not change and won’t until the position of the government changes. I think we may wish to think that we don’t know what H&M would have said if they still represented the Crown, but actually we do and it would be disappointing for those who believe reparations are owed. This is why I am glad Meghan in particular left because I think it would have been an impossible, soul and morality crushing experience that would have left her compromised.

    • Been says:

      Exactly all of this.

      While people can sympathize and be outraged at how Meghan was treated, even as someone who supports her, I have no argument or defense as to why she thought she would be safe within an institution built on colonization in the first place. And you best believe had she stayed, she would bear the brunt of questions surrounding that and made to justify and sanitize the messaging around it.

  10. GMHQ says:

    Exactly. H&M have no desire or need to return to that loony bin on salt island. They are having a bigger impact than the welfare royals have already without having to suffer from the attempts of incompetent courtiers to control them and dirty them um to make Scooter and Kant look better. The leave behinds should just sit back, enjoy the ride on the Montecito Express and bask in the glow of the Sussexes that would reflect well on the monarchy’s tarnished reputation if they would just let it.

  11. Tessa says:

    Scooter drove them out but he is obsessed with “punishing” Harry and Meghan. Why would the sussexes return to that.

  12. Jay says:

    There have been many articles openly begging for the Sussexes to come back and why they could really help the royals right now, but not even the most obsequious royal reporters can ever lay out what the benefit to Harry and Meghan would possibly be.

    Fulfilling duty? They do that better than the Windsors on their own. Safety? They are much safer away from salty isle. Money? They’ve got their own. Recognition? Fame? They’ve got it. All the Windsors can offer them is a lifetime of scorn and abuse.

  13. YankeeDoodles says:

    Anyone who’s grown up in a dysfunctional environment knows the drill: there’s always one person — often the mother — who laments the sad saga set in train by her own half-witted complicity and enabling, as if she were powerless, and laments the tragedy that ensues, the bitterness and rage and recriminations that never die. Because she never takes any accountability, and never opts to just apologise. It’s like an addiction. It’s actually worse than an addiction. An addict — every family has one of those — can attain a lucid and stunning degree of self-awareness. A co-dependent abuser? Never.

  14. Lady Digby says:

    Telegraph and co need to accept that there has been a divorce and that they got custody of childish , foot stomping Will and Kate who refuse to pull their weight as royals. Telegraph and Fail choose sides and glorified W and K and demonized H and M. Royals and tabs collaborated to drive Harry and Meghan out. Royals and tabs are stuck with a very problematic FK and FQ but that is their problem to deal with and report on : Harry and Meghan aren’t returning to rescue the Firm that constructively dismissed them 6 years ago.

  15. Tired says:

    Keep that slimmed down monarchy working and give their secret weapons (Peter, Zara, Mike, the Middletons, and whoever else) more responsibility.
    But let’s be honest they’re still trying to get Harry and Harry only back

  16. E says:

    I’m so happy Harry and Meghan are out and working to advocate for causes important to them (not thread-jacking but they also made a video presenting an NAACP award).

    The BRF was so shortsighted when they forced them to leave. Their charisma and empathy would have benefited the BRF right now.

  17. Catherine says:

    She would have to be mad to go back there or take her children there.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment