P6: ‘Insiders’ claim that Prince Harry & Meghan’s Netflix projects are ‘in limbo’

Last year, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s Archewell Productions signed a new deal with Netflix. In 2020, Netflix reportedly signed them to a five-year production/development deal for $100 million. Out of that contract, Prince Harry and Meghan produced multiple projects including With Love, Meghan, Heart of Invictus, Polo and their hugely successful Harry & Meghan docuseries. The H&M docuseries was the big “hit,” and WLM was a success as well, especially given that WLM was in the top-ten most-watched shows in dozens of countries. Last year, the Sussexes’ Netflix contract was not “renewed” under the old terms. Instead, they were given a first-look deal, which meant less money upfront but more freedom and less pressure. We’ve known that Archewell has at least two feature films in development limbo, Meet Me at the Lake and The Wedding Date (which was just announced in the past year). Now Page Six has some unnamed “Hollywood insiders” claiming that Harry and Meghan’s projects are going nowhere.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s remaining Netflix projects appear to be stuck in limbo — leaving their first look deal with the streamer up in the air, sources tell Page Six.

Back in August 2023, the Sussexes announced their media company, Archwell Productions, would produce a movie based on Carley Fortune’s hit book “Meet Me at the Lake.” Netflix paid around $3 million for the rights to the novel. But nearly three years later, we’re told the project is still classed as in development but hasn’t got very far — lacking both a director and a cast, leaving Hollywood insiders baffled.

“Three years in development for a movie like this at Netflix isn’t good,” a well-placed Hollywood source told us.

First look deals work by studios paying a retainer to producers in order to get first refusal on any projects they come up with; those producers then get paid more when they sell a project. It’s not known how long the Sussex’s first look deal lasts for.

In September, the Sussexes — who last week made a humanitarian trip to Jordan just days before the war against Iran started — also announced they were making an adaptation of Jasmine Guillory’s romantic novel, “The Wedding Date.” However, this, too, is still classed as in development at Netflix.

The Sussexes offered Netflix their new documentary “Cookie Queen,” which recently debuted at the Sundance Film Festival. However, the film about Girl Scout cookies has not yet been bought by a distributor or streamer, even though it won plaudits at Sundance.

As Page Six exclusively revealed, Markle’s lifestyle show, “With Love, Meghan,” has not been recommissioned by Netflix for a third season amid falling ratings.

“I don’t know how long this new deal is for, but if they don’t have anything to show soon, I can’t imagine it will be renewed,” said an industry source. We have reached out to Netflix and Sussex reps.

Rather than TV, Markle is believed to be concentrating on her tie-in lifestyle range, “As Ever,” made in tandem with Netflix. Although there had been chatter she could make a series of specials for holidays, including Valentine’s Day and July 4, so far, nothing has been given the green light.

Sources close to Archewell told us several scripted and unscripted titles are in various phases of development with the streamer and are moving through the normal creative process. We’re also told Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos gets on very well with the couple. They said that both “Meet Me at the Lake” and “The Wedding Date” remain in development, insisting that Archewell continues to have a positive and collaborative relationship with Netflix, a sentiment echoed by insiders at Netflix.

[From Page Six]

“I don’t know how long this new deal is for, but if they don’t have anything to show soon, I can’t imagine it will be renewed…” They literally just signed this new first-look deal last year? And they signed that deal after five years of “insiders” screaming and wailing about how Netflix hates the Sussexes and Netflix couldn’t wait to be free of them. Now, I also don’t get why it’s taking so long to put together Meet Me at the Lake, but I also think Netflix is taking a new approach with the Sussexes too. Anyway, I’m sure that Netflix is fine with the Sussexes and vice versa. These gloom-and-doom pieces always come out after the Sussexes are successful at something else. Like, by all metrics, Meghan’s As Ever has had a spectacular first year. They also had a great humanitarian trip to Jordan last week. That’s what this story is really about.


.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

28 Responses to “P6: ‘Insiders’ claim that Prince Harry & Meghan’s Netflix projects are ‘in limbo’”

  1. TheresaJanes says:

    A lot going on In the world. Im glad Harry/Meghan were able to get out of the Middle Eat before it went left. But I wonder, can blogs, the british media etc have ONE day off where they dont talk about Meghan and Harry? Hmmmm

    • Indica says:

      Of course not!

      …for one thing, they actually DO things, where W&K wouldn’t dream of doing things unless pushed by Charles. Can’t wait for the justifications of why they do nothing after he passes. I’m sure it’s going to be full of BUT MEGHAN!

      • TheresaJanes says:

        I think youve mistaken me for someone who DOESNT like Harry/Meghan. I think they are fantastic people and wish them every success. But, they are written about EVERY DAY in many publications and it gets tedious. I sure wouldnt want ppl writing about me everysingleday. Whether a publicatin is for or against, Meghan and Harry are used for clicks.

      • Indica says:

        I’m sorry, sarcasm doesn’t work well on the Internet and I forget that sometimes @TheresaJames.

        They work hard, they bring a lot of light to causes, and I wish them all the best. I just wish the other side didn’t use the ‘BUT MEGHAN’ as their excuse for being lazy.

    • Britt says:

      I know what you mean. H&M get written about because even fans can’t ignore the negative press.

  2. Tessa says:

    Derangers and bots obsessed with Sussex finances and Netflix contracts.

  3. Tuesday says:

    Is three years in development really that long for a movie, though? We hear all the time how it took someone 7 years to get their pet project to the screen. I’m too lazy to look it up, but I’m sure several big projects have long timelines.

    • Mia4s says:

      It really varies but these days there is nothing unusual about that in Hollywood at all. Announced projects with star actors are being quietly cancelled. Studios are more and more budget and risk averse.

      It’s an interesting experiment to look back at the past few years and announcements that: “Oscar Nominee Actor and Oscar Nominee Director are teaming up on a hot project that sparked a bidding war!!”. And then? Crickets….nada…nothing for years. Hollywood is not where it once was.

      • Ciotog says:

        This is so common it has a name: “development hell.” It’s a wonder anything gets made in Hollywood; it’s really difficult to make a picture!

    • Becks1 says:

      It doesnt seem that long to me and I also think the success of People We Meet on Vacation will hurry it along.

      Netflix knows that there is a market for screen adaptations of these big “chick lit” bestsellers. (I hate that phrase.) So I think that will help these projects.

    • Advisor2U says:

      It really depends on who is financing a movie/series project, the ownership/partnership, and who is going to distribute it.

      E.g. – I’ve noticed that Tyler Perry is delivering about five projects (series or/and films) for Netflix in ONE year (which is insane). The main reason being, that he is doing everything himself: filming at his own sets at his own Atlanta TP Studios, financing, scriptwriting, producing, directing, casting, and even acting in some of his movies/series.

    • Lucy says:

      No, it’s not that long. It takes time to find a writer. Then the writer has to write the script. Then they finally gets approval on the script but the actress Netflix wants to attach demands changes to her character or dialogue.

      Then after a few rounds of revision, her schedule shifts and she’s no longer available, so then you’re trying to attach this one particular actor, but you decide to make changes to make the script more appealing to him. Then a director comes on board, but meanwhile the actor has dropped out. etc etc etc. Often there are a lot of cul-de-sacs and it can just take a while without the project necessarily being dead. [source: I’m a screenwriter]

  4. Amy Bee says:

    The well placed source sounds like he/she doesn’t know anything that’s going on with Harry and Meghan so how are they a well placed source?

  5. Jais says:

    No idea about their projects but page 6 has been saying the same thing about them for years now so meh. Time will tell?

  6. Dee(2) says:

    I don’t even understand the point of these types of articles, because why do they care? They fulfilled the terms of their first contract, to both parties satisfaction, and earned their money. If they don’t do anything with Netflix ever again it’s not like that’s the only way that they can generate income.

    They clearly aren’t hurting for money so why the obsessive focus on whether or not they’ll release something for Netflix every year for the next 20 years? Also doesn’t sound like this industry source really understands first look deals. It means that they get the first look and right of refusal at anything that they want to do, not that they have to bring them something every 3 months, as most don’t even have output requirements.

    If the first look deal is for 24 months and they don’t bring them anything for 24 months, the deal’s over- the end. They just need them to be failures at something, and I guess referencing Spotify 3 years later looks stupid to them at this point too.

  7. Julia says:

    The article is hilarious because it tells us nothing we don’t already know. Harry and Meghan signed a new deal with Netflix in September. ‘Meet me at the Lake’ is still in the development phase. In December they announced that they were working on the Wedding Date movie, they are looking for a distributor for Cookie Queens. Meghan’s focus is AsEver. None of this is news. None of this means disaster for Harry and Meghan!
    Of course one day in the future the Netflix deal will end and then Harry and Meghan will move on to something else.
    I don’t see any reason for this article at all, except for the fear mongering click bait headline!

  8. Magdalena says:

    They’re still looking for content re H+M to write in order to distract from the Prince Andrew abuse case and the ongoing investigation and the leftover royals’ complicity in the cover-up, despite William’s embiggening demands to be co-monarch.

    And they think that if they claim that the projects are in limbo, then they will get a comment on the record so they can build more stories off that. That, and they are so stupid that even after years of getting zero leaks of the Sussexes’ business, they still believe that nothing is happening because they’re not hearing anything about their projects. Oh- and of course, the leftovers need to be soothed by their continued fantasies that H+M are just one failed project away from being penniless and will therefore soon go begging and crawling to their abusers, mainly William.

  9. Harla says:

    Since this “insider” is so certain that the Archewell projects are floundering, I honestly expect one to drop in the next month or so.

  10. Hypocrisy says:

    These articles seem “Willy” sourced.. which makes me laugh because Willy has accomplished nothing but being born into the BRF.. other than that what has he brought to the world or U.K. besides a truly horrific hate campaign against his own brothers family. What a disgrace he turned out to be.

  11. YankeeDoodles says:

    I take each and every one of these stories as a stab at the heart of the issue, which, I suspect, was the culture clash between Meghan and William, insofar as Meghan likes to get things done, generate momentum, zoom in, get to grips with the details, and see a correlation between effort and results. She’s tracking not goodwill alone, but measurable progress in her initiatives. She’s not into presenteeism. She comes from an American working culture, which is not a face-saving, keeping-up-appearances working culture. It’s not political. Much less symbolic. It is *amazing* how much British working culture revolves around maintaining group harmony, as if you were in a closet meeting of rage-aholics, or fisticuffs anonymous, or Tourette’s annual convention. No offence to people with real cases of Tourette’s. But everyone is *always* creeping on eggshells. And nothing gets done. British productivity is the lowest in the EU by a *wide* margin, like, 20-25% lower than Germany. Which is to be in a vicious cycle, like an economic death spiral. Add Brexit, and….. ouf. I think they try to paint Meghan & Harry as failing because Meghan did what no one since Margaret Thatcher was able to do, which was to pull the rug out from under their brand of lazy, entitled complacency. Not Good Enough, was her mark, and it stings, to this day. Because they know it’s true.

    • WaterDragon says:

      I could not agree more, YankeeDoodles. A perfect example of nothing getting done is the aftermath of the Grenfell tragedy. No one has been jailed for their criminal malfeasance. The revolting Eric Pickles was rewarded with a lordship, for god’s sake. Very typical. As far as I have been able to find on Google, the wrecked building still hasn’t been torn down or replaced. I am sure nothing has actually been done about removing the flammable cladding from all of the other buildings, which was a major promise , following the hearings. Watch the “Grenfell Uncovered” documentary if you need a refresher on this totally deplorable situation.

  12. ABritGuest says:

    Page six like other tabloids looking for its harry & Meghan bait hate & to distract from the BRF’s bad new cycle.

    H&m never announced they bought rights to meet me by the lake- the author did. Netflix didn’t announce it as a greenlit project until last August & The wedding date was just announced as a greenlit project in December. So to claim these projects are in limbo is ridiculous. In addition adaptations to screen can take years. I’m still waiting for the screen adaptation of Americanah which has been discussed and Lupita Nyong’o was attached to back in 2014!

  13. YankeeDoodles says:

    This is to reply to @Waterdragon, that is an excellent example. Thank you for including that recommendation. FWIW, Theresa May was the PM at the time of the fire, and as I recall, she met with fire fighters to console them, but not — AFAIK — the families who were living in the building when it burnt down. If you can believe it. Frankie Boyle did a brilliant piece on her creeping out of a meeting with people who were *not* the families, and the media shouting questions at her, and she was quite literally trying to duck under something to escape the barage. Like, just face the music, apologise, and be done with it. It would mean so much. Hiding??? WTF???

  14. Typical says:

    Harry and Meghan had a very successful visit with WHO in Jordan. So now it’s back to page 6, the carnival of do called experts, and others trying to discredit them.
    These people DO NOT know Harry and Meghan’s business

  15. tamsin says:

    Does anyone remember a while back there was a pap picture of Meghan lunching with Kimberly Williams-Paisley? I thought at the time, that she was a possibility for Meet Me at the Lake. I haven’t read the book, just read the plot synopsis. Both properties sound like they could be great movies that really touch the heart and social issues, or just be meh, depending on whose hands they are put into.

  16. chiclit says:

    The length of time re: development of books to show/movie has been on my mind with Scarpetta ..30 years? Not worried about H & M..

  17. Smices says:

    Given all the industry upheaval lately with Netflix trying to buy Warner Bros and that falling through, it’s no surprise that projects have been in limbo. Now that it looks like Netflix won’t have Warner Bros, they’re going to have to develop their own content and I wouldn’t be surprised if Meghan and Harry’s projects are part of that slate.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment