Duchess Meghan’s successful As Ever brand is splitting up with Netflix

There really is something about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex which turns even the most sober business/marketing/industry analysts and journalists into raving lunatics. It’s happening again right now with some news about Duchess Meghan’s As Ever brand. Meghan soft-launched her lifestyle brand in 2024 under the name American Riviera Orchard. ARO became some kind of decoy as she set up As Ever’s 2025 launch. Meghan worked on As Ever alongside her Netflix show With Love, Meghan – the two projects were connected, because Netflix also came on board as a silent partner for As Ever. As Ever was hugely successful from the start, selling out product drop after product drop for several months. Meghan quickly worked out her supply issues and, as I’ve said repeatedly, As Ever’s startup year has gone very well by any metric. Well, speaking of metrics, Meghan has already made enough money to buy out Netflix’s stake in the brand, and so that silent partnership is all over. The Sun broke the story, writing in part:

Insiders say Montecito-based Meghan, 44, is relieved to be able to “go it alone” after fearing As ever was being “held back” by “cautious” Netflix. The As ever split was mutual and the former working royal remains “on good terms” with Netflix supremo Ted Sarandos, it is said. Harry and Meghan still have a ‘first-look’ deal with the streaming giants with projects in the pipeline.

A source said: “Meghan is still on good terms with the Netflix team and close personal friends with Ted (Sarandos) so hasn’t wanted to upset him, but is very happy to have full control of the company. It’s a good time for Meghan to have complete control, given recent successes. Netflix have been a good partner, but she’s wanted to go global with the brand for some time, but has been held back by the more cautious Netflix team.”

[From The Sun]

Soon after the Sun published the big “split” announcement, As Ever’s spokesperson and Netflix’s spokesperson both issued statements to People Magazine. Note: this is merely about Meghan and Netflix breaking up in regards to As Ever. The Sussexes still have their first-look contract with Netflix:

Meghan Markle is moving forward with As ever without Netflix. The Duchess of Sussex’s lifestyle brand was developed in partnership with Netflix, but the streaming giant will no longer be a partner in the endeavor, The Sun was first to report on Friday, March 6. However, As ever will continue “independently,” according to spokespeople for the lifestyle brand as well as Netflix.

A spokesperson for As ever said, “As ever is grateful for Netflix’s partnership through launch and our first year. We have experienced meaningful and rapid growth, and As ever is now ready to stand on its own. We have an exciting year ahead and can’t wait to share more.”

A source close to the brand adds, “It’s a really exciting time for As ever, and Meghan is building with her team and enjoying the creative fulfillment that comes with creating a brand that’s so close to the life she authentically lives. This year is really about establishing the brand and scaling it.”

In addition, a Netflix spokesperson tells PEOPLE, “Meghan’s passion for elevating everyday moments in beautiful yet simple ways inspired the creation of the As ever brand, and we are glad to have played a role in bringing that vision to life.”

“As it was always intended, Meghan will continue growing the brand and take it into its next chapter independently, and we look forward to celebrating how she continues to bring joy to households around the world,” the Netflix spokesperson adds.

[From People]

It’s a really crazy moment (in general) to take a national brand global, but there have been hints of this in the past six months. Meghan has been figuring out how to take As Ever beyond the US, and that journey isn’t going to include Netflix. This is a success story, btw. An unsuccessful business wouldn’t be able to buy out their silent partner ahead of a global expansion. This is Meghan taking the reins of her successful business.

The Telegraph also had a curious exclusive about this Netflix-As Ever split where their sources maintained that Meghan was the one driving the split with Netflix because she has a two-year global rollout planned for As Ever and she was tired of Netflix’s cautious approach. Sources also said that Netflix’s investment in As Ever “will be paid back” and that the brand is now fully in Meghan’s control.

Photos courtesy of As Ever’s Instagram and Netflix.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

47 Responses to “Duchess Meghan’s successful As Ever brand is splitting up with Netflix”

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    I’m not a business woman by any means but even I know it’s pretty amazing for a startup to actually pay back it’s investors in the first year she has to be making alot of money, I absolutely love this for their entire family because it means those children and their parents will have security. My Easter basket gifts this year will include As Ever jams for children/grandchild..

  2. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    YEAH MEG! Go global now!!! Ship international!

    • mightymolly says:

      Right? I had wondered about the odd choice to not ship internationally or even all of North America. I hadn’t realized that was a Netflix decision. This is the right next step.

  3. Dee(2) says:

    Wait. They are trying to spin her being able to pay back her investors, and not have to split profits after 11 months as somehow bad? How?!!! These people don’t inhabit reality. So to them, her selling out every other product drop that is a limited release, AND figuring out scaling issues so that the more popular regular items are always available to the extent that they estimate she’s sold millions of jars of jam is evidence of a failing company?

    Man. The British media really realizes that they screwed up here. And so do a lot of these online commentators and detractors. They just refuse to admit that they’re wrong at this point. Because I don’t care how much you hate someone, if you’re want to argue that them being successful enough to no longer need a silent partner in their start up, is a bad thing you’ve lost the plot.

    Meghan is about to make bank. I hope they can scale up to global at some point later this year. It’s going to be bananas that first drop where you can get international shipping.

    • Christine says:

      Agreed, Dee. I am so impressed that she accomplished this in under a year. I can’t even imagine success on this level and timeline! Go, Meghan, you are amazing. Lucky Lili and Archie have quite the role models in their parents!

    • Julia says:

      @Dee I know we criticise the British media and rightly so but on this story the reporting from the British press has been OK. It’s Page Six which is a US outlet that has the deranged reporting. What you are seeing online in mostly generated by trolls and online commentators not the British media.

      • Dee(2) says:

        Except that Page Six is owned by Rupert Murdoch who also owns the Sun and the Sunday Times. And they frequently quote “Royal experts” and “insiders” in their news articles, which are just reporters for other British newspapers. They frequently start stories in Page 6 so that it’s coming from ” America” laundering the original criticism. I guarantee we’ll see articles tomorrow and Tuesday from the Telegraph and others as to why this is a bad thing for her. I’ve already seen some from the Express. I’m not giving this any quarter for them. They were caught off guard by a Friday evening announcement, and are working their talking points. If we don’t see Kaiser cover anything by Thursday from the British media as to how this makes her a huge failure I’ll rescind my point.

      • Magdalena says:

        Dee(2) you’re right. The Telegraph already put it on their front page (albeit at the bottom), pretending there were problems with the Netflix partnership and describing “regularly selling out” products as “a series of setbacks”.

        The reporting in the UK has been been steeped in the language of negativity, when any genuine, unbiased business expert would have taken one look at this and proclaimed it a success story. Come to think of it, the critics in this story were lyrical about another similar buyout by a founder not so long ago. So it’s another case of Opposite’s Day from the usual suspects.

        And yes, if they appear to be currently subdued, it’s because they’re road-testing their Kensington Palace-fed talking points in the rota WhatsApp groups.

    • I actually thought the Sun snippet was pretty positive/neutral. (Although I will add that I feel like we’ve seen this before where the initial reporting is positive/neutral, only to be followed up with weeks and weeks of horrible, false articles.) I don’t pay attention to the rota rats because they’re lying nasty rats, but I was shocked at how the Sun reported this.

      But I do completely agree with your general point that the British press and rota rats messed up big time, and they know it on some level. That’s why every single article and book (as we’ve recently seen) about the Leftover Royals has to include Harry and Meghan’s names to get any sort of attention. They picked the wrong horse and now are stuck with the lazy, stale, charisma-vacuum left-behinds.

      • Dee(2) says:

        They’ve done it plenty of times, but I feel like the Jordan reporting was like that initially. At first pretty much just the facts ma’am reporting, they were invited by the World Health Organization, they would be partnering with World Central Kitchen, they will be meeting with people who have been displaced. Nothing too eyebrow raising. Then we got days and days of this is why they’re the worst people on earth for daring to go and do something like this, trading on their titles, and refusing to comment on Andrew at the same time. When they are shocked they report like that, because they don’t want to get scooped on an article, but then it always descends into madness a few days later. The online trolls are always primed to be trolls so I don’t pay them any attention.

      • SussexWatcher says:

        You’re totally right, Dee. I don’t know why I was even giving them the benefit of the doubt when they’ve shown their asses every single time before. I mean, it’s the Sun FFS. I’m sure it’s just a matter of time before they revert to their usual.

  4. duchess of hazard says:

    Only haters of this woman would actually put down this remarkable achievement, tbh.

    Kaiser is right about it being a crazy time to do expand business world wide what with war, shipping lanes and costs being affected/ probably spiralling, but if you wait on the right time, it will never be the time, I suppose. So you seize the day and all that.

    Good on Meghan. Like someone said upthread, this is security and freedom for her small family.

    • mightymolly says:

      Another take could be though that the world is so bleak right now, maybe it’s a great time to launch something that brings a bit of joy. Customers of course will have to understand that supply chain and shipping delays will occur, but it’s also a nice reminder that American entrepreneurism still lives and many of us still embrace globalism. Sing it loud!

    • Magdalena says:

      If she establishes relationships with manufacturers in different countries to replicate what she has piloted and established in the US, then the shipping lanes and costs would not be a factor, I think.

      • Mightymolly says:

        I didn’t even think of that. She definitely shouldn’t hire me as her business manager, but I love the idea of true globalism. And there are wine producing regions on most continents. (Antarctica might need to order from overseas.)

  5. Julia says:

    The reporting from the UK press has been remarkably subdued on this. The Sun, The Times, the Telegraph, even the Mail wrote fairly balanced pieces indicating it was Meghan’s decision and not predicting imminent doom. The truly crazy reporting has been from Page Six (which seems to be staffed with derangers who lose their minds when Meghan breathes). Variety also had a crazy headline, although the article was more measured. The trolls and idiots on social media are having a field day. It’s amazing how many people don’t understand that legally Netflix can’t withdraw their investment early. The only way they can exit is if Meghan buys them out (or she gets another investor onboard). Either way that would not be possible unless the business was very successful.

    • Me at home says:

      Sykes also had a crazy article. Very predictably.

      • Julia says:

        I tend to ignore Sykes because since he got kicked out of the BP group chat his reporting has not had much connection to reality. I actually think he has multiple issues of his own which he is not really dealing with.

    • Dee(2) says:

      I don’t think they don’t understand it, I think they just want to take the most negative slant to anything that she does. These are also the people that somehow have made it bad to earn your own money, pay for your own things, buy homes with mortgages, end business deals when they no longer suit you, quit jobs when you want to move on, and decide how much or little of your personal life you want to share with the world.

      It’s just the business world version of no one wants to be friends with them. On one side it’s everyone hates them, on the other side it’s they can’t be successful without someone else’s propping and backing. They want them tied to other entities whether it’s the royal family or larger partners in the business world so that they can say that they’re not pulling their weight, and if they don’t they’re going to be cut adrift. Them having complete control over what they do and still being successful is the worst case scenario.

      • Julia says:

        @Dee I’m not talking about the journalists and paid commentators, they understand and twisting the narrative. The social media trolls are genuinely stupid though. They believe everything they are told.

    • Magdalena says:

      The Telegraph was not subdued at all. They set the narrative by claiming that the “split” occurred because M had become frustrated by the series of setbacks she had suffered – the “setbacks” being “regularly selling out stock”. This is the calm before the storm. They’ve just not had enough time to decide how best to attack her for being successful and diminish her success, yet again.

      • Julia says:

        For the Telegraph it was subdued it says AsEver no longer needs Netflix money and was looking to expand into international markets. I ignore the snark because that’s how they always write about her and just focus on the main points made in the article. Compare that to Page Six which said Netflix dumped her which is complete nonsense since Netflix was just a silent partner and investors legally withdraw investments before the end of contracts unless they find another investor or the founder is able to buy them out.

  6. So Meg’s business has been very successful and she was able to buy out the silent partner and will now take her brand global and salt isle thinks this is a bad thing? Well of course they do because they wanted desperately for her to fail and she has gone beyond being very successful and they can’t handled that truth!!! Congratulations Meg!! You go girl!!!

  7. Amy Bee says:

    Meghan being able to buyout Netflix after the first year is amazing. The British press is trying hard to spin this as a negative but taking back control means AsEver has been very successful. I wish her luck on this new journey.

  8. Over it says:

    So proud of Madame Duchess. She has earned her well deserved success. That rose looks so refreshing

  9. Jais says:

    This is exciting for Meghan. Gonna go have some jam in celebration 🎉

  10. Magdalena says:

    Someone online wrote that the same reporters who are calling this “a failure” and claiming it was “a split” to give the impression that AE has somehow “lost” (the Telegraph or the Times put a blurb at the bottom of their front page claiming with a straight face that “she” has – get this – “suffered a series of setbacks, with stock regularly running out” 😀 ) are the ones who were lauding a woman (former Apprentice) who had bought out Alan Sugar’s stake in her (skincare?) business and assumed full control, calling HER a success, barely 2 months ago.

    These people are so desperate to paint everything M does as a failure that they don’t seem to realise that they are constantly revealing their own biases, racism and ineptitude each time they write the opposite of sensible business takes on her ventures while writing “normal” ones for others.

    This is actually a stunning success story, to be able to take 100% charge of her brand in less than a year after launching. Many founders would kill to be able to do that – to experience “setbacks” like that! And you just KNOW that Meghan has made millions since launching As Ever – but the haters would rather join forces to paint her business as having failed than admit that.

    When the brand was partnered with Netflix, they called her a failure “who clearly could not make it on her own” and now that she’s clearly able to make it on her own, they’re insinuating that she was “dumped” by Netflix and is therefore a failure. Desperately trying to make this sound like the Spotify debâcle… and looking ridiculous in the process.

    • Nic919 says:

      If this was a bad split then Netflix would never have sent out the press release they did. They confirm this was always the plan and praise her all the way. Now unless they say that Meghan can control what Ted Sarandos wants to say, this is not the awful situation the British press want to pretend it is. In fact it is the opposite.

      • Emily says:

        @NIC919Who in the British press is saying this is an awful situation? It’s actually Page Six and the Daily Beast who are acting like this is the end of the world for Meghan, with unhinged reporting.

      • Lilly (with the double-L) says:

        Agreed and as Dee pointed out above Page 6 is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Seems like another tactic, also pointed out by others, try a subterfuge of it being American reporting a bunch of nonsense from “experts” and “friends,” then report in the British rags. Which does fool some. These tactics won’t go away through goodwill or ethics, only when people stop being willingly tricked. Hard to see that happening at this point in time. But, the real story makes me so happy! Congratulations As Ever/Meghan on a peerless business unveiling, goods and growth.

      • Nic919 says:

        Page Six is owned by Murdoch and this was in the Sun as well. And the telegraph is British. They are all spinning this negativity as they usually do.

  11. Chelsea says:

    Well it looks like she finally got a competent comms person because a year or 2 ago they would’ve never had such nuanced reporting on this even in People much less The Sun or the Torygraph. I know international squaddies are ecstatic to hear about this news that she’s planning for an international roll out. Im looking forward to seeing how As Ever continues to grow.

  12. Harla says:

    I recall Meghan saying, on the Aspire podcast, that she would be looking for investors when As Ever goes global. It appears that now is the time that she’ll be to share her offerings with a much wider audience. I’m very excited for her and As ever, this is going to be a busy year!

  13. Elly says:

    Congratulations to Meghan. 🎉

  14. GMHQ says:

    I have a packaged goods management background and it has seemed to me that she was exploring which product lines made the most sense to run with and her Netflix run allowed her to do that with low financial risk. I think she will now be trying out different international markets next and then will be looking to be acquired by a multinational like Unilever and stay on as a board member and Brand steward.

  15. QuiteContrary says:

    She really is a badass.

  16. Preston says:

    Netflix’s second big loss in a week! They are doomed.

  17. Gemini says:

    Look I’ve watched Suits so I know how contracts work, LOL. I am certain there were conditions of how to buy out a partner in the original contract. I think Meghan fulfilled the criteria much much earlier than planned. I am so happy for her accomplishments. That said, I think both As ever and Netflix were a little bit vague in their announcement. They prioritized that there were no hard feelings between the two companies because that’s their go to trauma response I guess. However the vagueness in the statements left space for the ill willed tabloids including Variety, to use verbs like dumped, or ended or parted ways. Sigh.

    • Eurydice says:

      Well, Netflix says “as it was always intended…” This makes sense to me. Netflix isn’t in the business of selling retail products unless they’re marketing merchandise to promote their shows. And As Ever really wasn’t about promoting WLM, rather the other way around. It looks like both sides got what they wanted.

    • kirk says:

      “Look I’ve watched Suits so I know how contracts work, LOL.”
      Love it!
      Deadline frames the story “Netflix Withdraws Its Investment In Meghan Markle Lifestyle Brand As Ever,” without saying anything about performance or timeline criteria, but indicating it was intended to be temporary. “A Netflix statement provided to Deadline indicated that the streaming giant was never planning to be a long-term backer of the lifestyle company.” Good for her!

      ” Despite ‘decline’ indication in Deadline article, Elle reports With Love, Meghan “was Netflix’s most-watched culinary show in 2025.”

  18. Tarte Au Citron says:

    So it was OK when her father-in-law set up a successful food company, and then pivoted to Waitrose when (as usual) Charles refused to spend any of his own money on keeping Duchy Originals afloat during the recession.

    Meghan has a good track record in investing in high end food brands. God forbid she might actually know her stuff.

    • Christine says:

      I will never forget that Clevr was the first company she invested in (publicly), and just look at them now!

  19. This is pretty phenomenal. I’m so happy for Meghan and As ever. Let’s not forget that they have screenwriter Tracy Oliver adapting Jasmine Guillory’s bestseller The Wedding Date for Netflix. Meghan & Harry are beyond fine and they’re not sucking on the tit of the UK tax payers.

  20. Gewels says:

    I think it’s astonishing that the brand goukd buy itself out. I would think she’s trying to get distribution deals in place at home, rather than going international. It’s not that easy to go out of the home market, so I think it’s more about going big at home.

  21. GoodWitchGlenda says:

    As ever (pun intended), I am flummoxed by why anyone cares enough about her behind the scenes business ventures to dedicate multiple articles to trying to tear her down. Buy/watch/listen to her products or don’t. You don’t have to like her- but why get in a tizzy about every little move? None of it is newsworthy. She’ll have the last laugh, though, as all this reporting, good or bad, helps her increase brand awareness.

  22. AC says:

    Well as always we got Negativity from the other side of the pond this weekend. Do they not understand that’s how entrepreneurship works – I guess not as that’s not really that island’s mindset or strongpoint. This is not a surprise to me. It’s been hinted as a plan, and even M would say it in interviews last year. She wants to see her brand grow. To the point where she can now be independent to take it to a direction she wants, so she buys their stake of it and spins it off to be her own co. While Netflix strategically focuses on their primary domain business, which has been video streaming.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment