John Davidson involuntarily screamed a racist slur at Wunmi Mosaku at the BAFTAs

Two weeks after the racist fiasco at the BAFTAs, and we’re still learning terrible new information. During the taping of the BAFTAs on February 22nd, John Davidson was seated (by his own account) about forty rows back and close to some kind of microphone. Davidson has Tourette’s, and he was invited to the BAFTAs because a film about his life, I Swear, was up for several awards. Davidson began ticcing very early into the awards show. Something I just learned is that Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were the first presenters of the show. Soon after they walked up to the podium, Davidson loudly screamed the n-word at them. BAFTA’s producers refused to offer any explanation, comfort or care to MBJ and Delroy following that moment, and even though the show was on a two-hour delay, the BBC still aired the racist slur. We also learned, via Hannah Beachler’s tweets after the BAFTAs, that Davidson also ticced the same racist slur at her and another woman.

Well, here’s what we’ve learned since the first week this complete fiasco: Davidson stayed in the auditorium after he ticced that racist slur at Lindo and MBJ, and he also ticced the same racist slur at Wunmi Mosaku when she won the Best Supporting Actress BAFTA. That was mentioned in passing in a Deadline piece several days ago, and I wondered if Deadline had gotten it wrong since we hadn’t heard that before. But no, it’s true. Davidson was still in the room and he involuntarily shouted the n-word at a pregnant woman who was receiving her first BAFTA Film award. Why is this coming out now? Because the BBC is using the slur directed at Mosaku to explain why they missed the one directed at Jordan and Lindo.

BBC director-general Tim Davie has answered questions from the U.K. government’s Culture, Media & Sport Committee over the incident that erupted following the BAFTA ceremony in which the shouting out of a racial slur was aired despite the broadcast being on a two-hour time delay.

In what has unfortunately come to overshadow the 2026 awards, John Davidson, the Tourette’s campaigner and inspiration for film “I Swear,” made the involuntary outburst while “Sinners” stars Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo presented the first award of the night. The incident sparked a firestorm of anger, much focussed on the BBC for not removing Davidson’s tic from its broadcast.

In a letter to committee chair Dame Caroline Dinenage, Davie sought to explain the events of the evening to clarify why the N-word outburst was not edited out, asserting that it was a “genuine mistake, and we take full responsibility for our error.”

Davie said that the BBC’s “initial evidence gathering” found that no-one in the on-site broadcast truck heard the initial when they were watching the live feed. “Because no-one in the broadcast truck was aware it was on the live feed, there was therefore no editorial decision made to leave the language in,” he said. However, he noted that a second outburst of the word occurred while Wunmi Mosaku accepted her best supporting actress award.

“In that instance, the edit team did hear the racial slur on the feed and removed it immediately from the version of the ceremony that would be broadcast later that evening. This was in line with protocols and procedures that were in place for this event.”

The mistake occurred, he claimed, when the edit team started receiving reports about a racial slur, “including from BAFTA.” He said: “Our understanding at this point is that the team editing the show in the truck mistakenly believed they had edited out the incident that was being referenced, on the basis that they had heard and edited out the slur shouted out during the best supporting actress award. Therefore, when they were told a racial slur had been shouted, they believed they had removed it.”

[From Variety]

I actually understand this explanation from the BBC, god help me – they were being told about a racist slur and they thought, “yeah, we’ve got it, we’re editing it out.” And the whole time the BBC thought it would be crazy for BAFTA to allow Davidson to continue ticcing racist slurs at people in the room. Screaming the n-word – even involuntarily – should ensure a quick escort out of the room. The fact that Davidson was allowed to continue sitting there and he was the one who chose to leave the auditorium after he involuntarily racially abused FOUR PEOPLE that we know about, well, it doesn’t speak well to BAFTA’s existing policies. It’s truly astounding that it took so long for BAFTA and the BBC to both apologize and admit mistakes.

Now, that being said, I’m not excusing the BBC whatsoever- this explanation of “we didn’t hear it” is bullsh-t. But as I’ve said before, focusing on whether or not the BBC edited out racist slurs is missing the forest for the trees – the real issue is why BAFTA was perfectly fine with allowing Wunmi Mosaku, Michael B. Jordan, Delroy Lindo and Hannah Beachler to be racially abused at a f–king awards show as they were celebrating their film among their colleagues.

Meanwhile, Deadline reported that Warner Bros executives were “furious” in a meeting with the BBC just days after the BAFTAs. Those American executives apparently read those British folks the riot act. I hope Warner Bros saved some of that anger for BAFTA’s higher-ups too. And this conspiracy of silence around the racist slur when Mosaku was on stage is deeply unsettling.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images, screencap courtesy of ABC.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

37 Responses to “John Davidson involuntarily screamed a racist slur at Wunmi Mosaku at the BAFTAs”

  1. seaflower says:

    I’m waiting for the video of WanK laughing or smirking as it happened. You know they would have found it funny, the jerks.

    • speechless says:

      No of course they wouldn’t. No one in their right mind would find that funny. They would have been just as mortified as John Davidson himself. This is simply an awful situation for everyone involved.

      • Nerd says:

        I wouldn’t be surprised if there is a video of them laughing or smirking this off as it happened. This is the couple who awkwardly laugh and smirk at the most inappropriate things. William thought it was appropriate to say that only black or brown countries are known for starting wars as well as saying that people in Africa shouldn’t have more than two children because it affects the environment, while his wife was pregnant with their third child. Kate is the one who allowed a racist trope and lie to be used against a pregnant biracial woman. She’s also the one who smirked at children and said “whatever” when they mentioned Harry and Meghan. She’s also the one who grabbed her husband constantly during royal engagements, including those in churches. They are both the couple who told people from Ukraine that they could only give a smile and a wave while smiling and ignoring the devastation those people were experiencing. They also were the ones who laughed and continued on with their own umbrellas when school aged children were left in cold and drenching rain during at least two separate occasions.

  2. Interested Gawker says:

    😮

    This hideous situation keeps getting worse and worse, like peeling away layers of an onion!

  3. Dee(2) says:

    So for once I’m not going to focus on John Davidson in this entire cluster. I have to ask what does the inclusion policy and DEI training look like at BAFTA and the BBC? Excluding DEI training, what sort of training do they have on dealing with unexpected incidents during show tapings and live broadcast? Because it seems lacking to put it lightly.

    Do they/did they think nothing like this could ever happen? I mean what if someone screamed out a racial slur who didn’t have Tourette’s? Did they not have a plan in place for that? What if a Will Smith type of event occurred? Nothing in place to go immediately to commercial, deal with audience fallout? Like, what the hell are they planning for during these events?

    It sounds like there’s no fail safe, no actual policy of double checking, no real SOP on what needs to be verified, and an idea that the other person is handling the issue. If they’re doing these events in conjunction with each other there’s never a meeting with the head to the department’s running everything to make sure that there’s no overlap and that everyone is going to work together?

    • Lamb Chop says:

      They managed to edit out ‘free Palestine’ in a speech so…

    • ChillinginDC says:

      What you said. Why I said their inclusive policy was nonsense at best and them not even thinking through how this could go wrong and when it went wrong they just sat back. Ugh. Everything about this continues to get worse. I see why the Sinners cast are just like leave me be about the whole thing.

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    As I said a couple of weeks ago, when the woke people in the room are Warner Bros. executives, something is very wrong indeed. Absolutely none of this should have happened in the first place. Bad judgement all around. And I’m willing to bet that Davidson ticced the awful slur at every Black person he saw that night. Sure sounds like it.

  5. Elle says:

    This was awful for everyone involved. The aftermath was handled inappropriately, and the set up where he was sitting close to a microphone was outright negligent. That being said, I suppose a very thin silver lining is that it brought a lot of awareness to Tourette Syndrome. Again, a VERY thin silver lining. But I really didn’t know much about Tourette’s, and now I know more. That has to be such an incredibly difficult unseen disability to have.

    • Mumster says:

      It’s also incredibly difficult to be seen as only a derogatory slur because of your color, to the point that a person with Tourettes can only tic THAT word at you. There, I’ve shifted the spotlight a little to include ALL the people who were affected that day.

    • Elly says:

      Not unheard! Actually, not unseen either. Many Tourette’s tics are physical instead of verbal.

  6. Boxy Lady says:

    Dang! Dude was getting everybody in Sinners, huh? I’m really glad that Waner Bros stood up for them.

  7. Jais says:

    The bbc still kept the unedited video up until midday Monday. Despite WB’s complaints. So yeah no.

  8. North of Boston says:

    If you were told to go looking for a gross racial slur in a broadcast, wouldn’t you, IDK, start at the beginning? Their lame explanation about why it was left in when MBJ and DL were onstage makes no sense … they were the FIRST presenters and it wasn’t subtle.

    And they’re trying to say no one from BAFTA, BBC noticed it in real time and paid attention to when it happened, every time? Not just lazy, sloppy, and unprofessional but also evidence of them not caring about how black performers are treated, and there are only awful ‘reasons’ that would explain that.

  9. SgtPepper says:

    BAFTAs is awful for allowing this to happen, perhaps even instigating it! They surely didn’t take any steps to prevent it and did a bang up job trying to hide that it even happened.

    But I’m sorry…Davidson should be truly ashamed of himself for leaving such a stain on the nights of all the people in the room, especially the Sinners cast members who got racial slurs shouted directly at them and the Black people who had to hear it. It’s traumatic. He feels he has the right to say these things because of his disability, and that others should just excuse him. No, sir. If you cannot take your own steps to prevent harm to others, please do not share space with those to whom you will do harm. Not everyone belongs everywhere. He knows that this is a word he WILL say when he tics with Black people. He knows that he will be in a room full of them. He knows what is possible, and he decided everyone else should just deal with it.

    But this is the same attitude of white men the world over. To them, they have the right to ALL spaces. I don’t think this would have gotten so far if a Black man or woman was yelling profanities and slurs at guests. We would have seen a pre-recorded video and that’s it.

    • ChillinginDC says:

      He and some of the advocates have left a bad taste in my mouth. As others have said, they don’t seem to think inclusive includes Black people and that’s all I am going to say about it.

    • Starry Owl says:

      The fact that he said he would be mortified if anyone thought he MEANT those words or INTENDED to say them said everything.

      You don’t have to intend to hurt someone to hurt them. The impact of your words and actions being hurtful doesn’t have to be intentional for you to be sorry that you hurt someone.

      This whole debacle was handled so poorly from its inception. No planning. No training. No thought given to anyone.

      But the worst of it was the active failing of people in real time. No one checked on the racially abused presenters or award winners or audience members. No one went to Davidson and said – bro. We know this wasn’t intentional but we have a duty of care to everyone attending and watching and we need to make sure this doesn’t happen again.

      The fact that he didn’t think that immediately and take himself out just shows how baked in the racism is in the UK. And the world.

    • Potatoe says:

      @SgtPepper Thank you. There is no excuse for racial abuse.

    • Chaine says:

      He seems like an absolutely dreadful entitled person. If he had any decency, knowing that this was his proclivity, he would have stayed home from the award show. The more I learn, I have lost all sympathy for him.

      • Gill says:

        He absolutely did not know he would shout that out, his form of TS does not have particular sayings or phrases, it can be anything at any time, he is not entitled in the slightest, he is a community centre caretaker in a rural village who has spent his life trying to find acceptance for his condition that drove him to attempt suicide as a child!!!! If people refuse to watch the film as a result of this debacle I implore you to watch any of his documentaries on YouTube or the latest one on Prime and see how truly humble he is and how difficult his entire existence has been for him, the blame for this rests entirely with BAFTA and the BBC for not protecting any of the individuals involved but it is very disheartening that only one person affected has shown any understanding that it is his disability that shouted out the word and not the individual…however I am also shocked and appalled that the R-word is used so freely in the US to describe a disabled person when it has been taboo to say for decades in the uk

  10. YankeeDoodles says:

    Yeah…. That last comment got me laughing, and I needed a laugh today. Thank you, SgtPepper. Check out the sketch on the inaugural season of SNL between Richard Pryor and Chevy Chase. It’s a tit-for-tat in racism but it’s from *both* sides, very fine people, LOL, on both sides and it’s *hysterical.* Agreed, if a black man had been screaming “HONKY!!!!” at the stage, he would have been ever so politely urged to enjoy the amenities of the green room.

    • Jais says:

      Imagine he yelled out racist cracker or pedophile protector at Prince William. I have a theory, with no proof, that the BAFTAS made sure to take Davidson out of the theater while William did his speech. Didn’t this man once curse at the Queen? And yet we’ve heard not a word of anything that got yelled while the future king was onstage. That sounds really unlikely considering the nature of tics. And that’s bc the BaFtas made sure William was protected and Davidson was not in the room at that moment when William was in the stage. Again, I have no proof whatsoever but I’m betting it went down that way. And I’d also be willing to bet that this is something the BAFTAS does not want known.

      • Ciotog says:

        If it had been a Black person with Tourette’s who called William “racist” you can bet that that person would have been escorted out.

      • Nanny to the Rescue says:

        Apparently he called the then prince Charles “f****ing parasite”, so I can imagine they kept him well away from William.

        But I have to admit that is funny. It’s also way more personal.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    Yeah, I’m not accepting this excuse. If they caught the slur against Wunmi why didn’t they go over the broadcast to make sure that there weren’t any slurs when other black people were on the stage? Was it because Michael and Delroy are American?

  12. Cathy says:

    All this backpedaling but Davidson still won’t give a direct apology? Sigh. All these excuses that aren’t an apology make me think those slurs were left in to create some controversy and maybe some more people will tune in to watch? It’s not like people are tuning in to see William and Kate, are they?
    But, still, Davidson hasn’t said sorry directly?

    • Nanny to the Rescue says:

      I am in the minority here because I think he certainly shouldn’t give the apology directly. Because I can see him yelling that word at them again, as it is the repeat of the same situation (him meeting with or just addressing black men and women), only with more eyes watching and analysing everything.

      That apology should have been issued via another person – or by himself but with a stern warning of what could happen and with asking the people affected first if they even want to meet in private – and definitively before all this brouhaha happened in the media. Too late now.

  13. NoBS Please says:

    BAFTA execs were like: “like our president Prince William says, we’re very much not a racist organisation!”

  14. Emmy Rae says:

    Every time I see that still of Delroy Lindo’s face I just want to cry. I love his work and find him to be such an earnest artist. He deserved an unblemished moment of being lifted up!

  15. Mel says:

    No one in that room was respected or protected, ESPECIALLY the people of color. Shame on the BAFTA’s and BBC for allowing this to happen in the first place and continually bungling the response.

  16. Delta Juliet says:

    Doesn’t some of the responsibility fall on Davidson himself? I would think after one offensive tic, he would have removed himself from the situation. I feel terrible for all the people who were being awarded and ended up having slurs hurled at them.

  17. GMHQ says:

    Part of the problem is the lack of empathy by the Brits when it came to the matter of race. This wasn’t about black actors forcing people to choose anti racism over disability rights. It was about the notion it was an overreaction to express outrage over a disabled person using the “n word” when it should not have been made such a big deal given the circumstances. Let’s face it, by referring to the word as the N Word instead of repeating what was actually uttered they took the sting out of the offense. If all of the accounts actually said Ni**er, people would not have been able to dismiss the offense and there would be no polite both sides-ism that let people ultimately dismissed any concerns for the lack of protection of black talent at the event and in the reporting.

    • Beverley says:

      Every. Damn. Word.☝🏾 This BAFTA incident and the messy aftermath have opened my eyes to British culture. It certainly explains the ongoing abuse and vitriol directed at Duchess Meghan. Nobody can convince me that the UK is a welcoming place for Black folks.

  18. thatgworl says:

    The BBC is to blame. Inclusion doesn’t just mean making sure everyone’s in the room, it also means SAFETY for everyone that’s in the room. They didn’t keep the Black people who shouldn’t have to be subjected to racist slurs, voluntary or not, safe and they certainly didn’t provide safety guardrails for John David either. Everyone’s falling over themselves for one man, but very few people want to address the violence of the n-word towards 4 separate Black people.

  19. Sean says:

    Of course it was the BBC’s fault unless there was a conspiracy among the audio crew to not only place a mic near the Tourette’s fellow but to open that mic when they felt he’d explode.
    This doesn’t read as stupid as much as it does intentional.
    Stupid from an institution once held in high esteem like the BBC is bad enough but intentional is much, much worse.

  20. tamsin says:

    I can only confirm what I suspected- racism is deeply imbedded in both the BBC and BAFA. The fact that nobody from either organization seemed to bat an eyelash when this happened in real time says it all.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment