Celebrities are furious about the ‘unforgiving’ lighting at the VF Oscar party

A few days before the Oscars, Page Six ran a curious story about celebrities complaining in advance of the annual Vanity Fair Oscar party. VF switched locations for their party (from the Wallis Annenberg Center to LACMA), and the new VF chief Mark Guiducci had culled the guest list, leaving various executives and celebrities fuming. Well, what was funny about all of that is it seems like the biggest issue on Oscar night wasn’t the guest list. The lighting was the biggest problem – no one at Vanity Fair thought to ensure that their celebrity guests looked cute as they posed for photos.

Some stars say the Vanity Fair Oscar party cast them in a bad light — literally. Following the high-profile post-Academy Awards soirée at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art on Sunday, A-list attendees were allegedly complaining of the “crazy-bright” lighting and “unforgiving” pics.

“I felt like I was standing under klieg lights,” one guest told the Hollywood Reporter following the ultra-exclusive fête that VF retooled with a slashed guest list, less outside press and a new venue. Another attendee joked that she felt like she was hitting early menopause under the glaring lights.

“It was like a hundred degrees,” the anonymous guest told THR. “I was literally having hot flashes.”

The Hollywood trade pointed out that the annual affair was previously known for its “sublime” red carpet lighting when the party was traditionally in Beverly Hills at the Wallis Annenberg Center.

A person described by THR as “a longtime party fixture” noted that the “meticulously calibrated” and flattering lighting was previously “the secret of the Oscar party’s success.”

“I’ve been shot at a million parties, but the setup for that party was always sublime,” they told the outlet. “When you posed for the paps at the VF gala, even the ugliest stars knew they’d come out all right. It was like magic!”

But an insider noted that the lighting this year was, “Like being shot in extremely high-def.”
“You saw a lot of excess pounds and wrinkles that used to be hidden,” they shared. “Nobody wants to be photographed like that!”

A light gray carpet — which was new for Sunday’s event — seemingly made matters worse.

“I genuinely feel bad for some of these women,” another guest complained. “One poor actress looked like a Diane Arbus character. She was on her phone looking at her pictures and shrieking at her publicist. I heard that she went home and cried herself to sleep. Nobody has heard from her since!”

[From Page Six]

I’m including photos from this year’s VF party in the post – judge for yourself. It’s true that the old VF party had much more moody and forgiving lighting – the old set up was geared more towards pools of light on certain marks, and dramatic shadows and a calmer mood in general. This year’s photos really come across as antiseptic, like they’re being used to illustrate a medical journal. Those poor celebrities! Many of the A-listers didn’t even go to the VF party either, maybe they heard about the lighting. Apparently, Emma Stone rented a bus for her Bugonia peeps and they party-hopped all night, but didn’t go to the VF party. Hm.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

31 Responses to “Celebrities are furious about the ‘unforgiving’ lighting at the VF Oscar party”

  1. Graphinya Heather says:

    There is no lighting in the world that will make Bezos’ blow up doll wife look good. In every lighting, at every angle, she looks try hard and pained from the over inflated lips and bolt ons. Other wise, I think the rest looked fine. Not stellar but fine.

  2. Alice B. Tokeless says:

    Imagine slipping into your massive bed, in your large, well-appointed home in a safe, gated community and crying yourself to sleep because you took a few “bad” photos, while children in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Iran, etc., are being bombed out of their modest homes, and many right out of their lives. It’s understandable why they are speaking anonymously; I’d be too ashamed to be attached to said complaint during such a global crisis. It really is time to eat the rich.

  3. StellainNH says:

    No amount of lighting could help Lauen Sanchez Bezos. All that plastic makes her look rather freakish.

  4. LeaTheFrench says:

    I think it’s more the combined metallic background + harsh light make it look like they’re in an underground vet lab.

  5. Wilma says:

    But do they look bad because of the lighting? I don’t really see it. The Kardashians look pretty decent.

    • Mango says:

      Of course the Kardashians look okay; plastic mannequins are designed for display under bright lights. Whether in a department store or on a red carpet, plastic doesn’t move, sag, or wrinkle.

      Though, if it really was that blazing hot under the lights, I AM surprised they didn’t melt.

      • Kitten says:

        I guess Kris will just wear gloves forever since her old hands don’t match the rest of her. What a dilemma….

  6. Yup, Me says:

    Nicole Kidman looks like the fancy white lady version of the ghost from the ring with her hair all in her face. I wish she would stop that.

    Lauren Sanchez yoinked her face and ballooned her bits so she could be a play thing with a shitty prenup for a LDE villain who looks like a fkn toe. She looks exactly like what she did.

    Everyone else looks good. I love Mikey Madison’s dress and how it looks like it was being peeled off of her.

  7. Bash says:

    After reading the article, I expected to see some really unflattering photos. Are these….it? Or did they not release the worst ones? Because everyone looks fine to me. Not the best, not the worst.

    Even the Kardashians, who sometimes look awfully plastic-y in natural light, look nice here.

  8. Normades says:

    It’s bright but I think everyone looks fine. It was the grey washed background that looked dated.

  9. amb says:

    Sure, the lighting is harsh and the background is ugly, but the reaction makes me wonder if those people (especially the ones with fainting couches) think they look better than the rest of us know they do. They don’t look BAD, but they do look human.

  10. Nikzilla says:

    1st world problems wow.

  11. MSJ says:

    Looks like Hollywood is shifting. I think the current state of media ownership (influenced by those billionaires linked to the current government’s agenda) has impacted the social circles. False narratives and outlandish ‘alternative facts’ are no longer relegated to the Enquirer and other trash tabloids. The trade publications seems to have shifted their modus operandai towards tabloid style narratives like the Enquirer. I think veteran actors, entertainers, producers and directors are guarding their privacy and being very selective about where they socialize and how they socialize. Seems they are choosing to show up only at events they are required to attend for their projects. Gone are the days when you’d see major movie stars, entertainers, etc. attend the party just for the fun of it, hanging out with their peers. 😔

  12. lamejudi says:

    I think Ed-has-no-Harris (ha!) looks smoking hot no matter what lighting he’s in. And Amy Madigan looks beautiful.

  13. JW says:

    I think they look the same as always—over-injected, carved to hell and back in some cases and fine in others. The carpet color is an interesting touch. The complaining just makes them seem more out of touch than usual.

    I care less and less about their industry the more they whine about their ridiculous “problems”.

  14. Mightymolly says:

    The lighting in the restroom at work has taught me to love myself despite brassy hair dye and dry skin (my mirror at home shows rich color and smooth skin, but whatever). I invite them all to visit this bathroom and never fear harsh light again.

  15. Estelle says:

    “When you posed for the paps at the VF gala, even the ugliest stars knew they’d come out all right.”

    Quite a quote.

  16. Sue says:

    Well, I do have to say that I think Amy Madigan and Ed Harris look fantastic in the VF carpet photo. Maybe it’s their likability factor.

  17. wordnerd says:

    “I heard that she went home and cried herself to sleep. Nobody has heard from her since!”

    Quote of the day. Feels like a line from a mockumentary about celebrity, and I’m here for it.

  18. Amy Bee says:

    Maybe this party has run its course.

  19. Susan says:

    Vanity Fair is shooting itself in the foot. This party used to be THE place to be seen and photographed after the Oscars and now the new editor is ruining it. I hate to always pine for the good old days but . . .

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment