Princess Diana’s recordings for Andrew Morton will be made into a docuseries

Towards the end of Princess Diana’s marriage, circa 1991, Diana instinctively understood that she needed to get “her side” out there by any means necessary, partly because she couldn’t keep it all bottled up and partly because she couldn’t stand the status quo of her sh-tty marriage to a serial philanderer. She arranged to work with Andrew Morton on the book which would become Diana: Her True Story. Because Morton and Diana couldn’t be seen together, and he certainly couldn’t openly interview her, they worked out a system where he would write down questions and she would record herself answering the questions and telling her story. The tapes were then transferred to Morton via one of Diana’s close friends. Those tapes have been around for a long time, and they’ve been used in many documentaries over the years. I don’t know if Morton “owns” the tapes per se, but he’s certainly made the tapes available to certain producers and documentary filmmakers. Well, they’re dusting off the tapes again.

Love Monday TV and 53 Degrees Global are producing “Diana: The Unheard Truth” (working title), a three-part docuseries centered on five hours of audio recordings of Diana, Princess of Wales that have never been made public, with the series set to launch on Aug. 31, 2027 – the 30th anniversary of her death.

The recordings were captured in 1991 by Dr. James Colthurst, a close friend of the Princess. The tapes were covertly removed from Kensington Palace and delivered to author Andrew Morton, whose resulting biography “Diana Her True Story” altered the course of royal history. In the three decades since Diana died, fewer than one hour of the material had been heard publicly.

Love Monday TV has secured full access to the archive in partnership with Morton and Colthurst, who also appear in the series alongside publisher Michael O’Mara. All three revisit the circumstances under which the Morton book was produced, including the risks Diana took and the intense scrutiny all three endured in the process.

The tapes cover Diana’s account of life within the royal family, her predictions about the futures of Charles and Camilla, and her own ambitions for a life independent of the Crown. Further contributors include prep schoolmate Delissa Needham, in her first on-camera appearance; hairdresser Sam McKnight; astrologer Penny Thornton; dancer Wayne Sleep; former bodyguard Ken Wharfe; royal press secretary Dickie Arbiter; photographer Kent Gavin; and Daily Mail journalist Richard Kay.

[From Variety]

They’re playing fast and loose, but they do note that “fewer than one hour of the material had been heard publicly.” As I said, the existence of the tapes has been known for decades and clips have been used in many other programs. But it’s interesting that Morton and James Colthurst have apparently agreed to open up their full archives so that Diana’s own words and her voice can be preserved in some way. I’m interested to see what Diana said in 1991 about Camilla in particular, and if Diana spoke about any of Charles’ other mistresses at the time. Diana was well aware of many of them.

Next year is the thirtieth anniversary of Diana’s death, and I imagine there will be many, many documentaries and special programs made. There’s been a rumor for years that Netflix wants to make a Diana documentary with Prince Harry’s help, possibly even with Harry producing. I don’t know if that would happen, but as I said, it’s a rumor going around.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Princess Diana’s recordings for Andrew Morton will be made into a docuseries”

  1. Tessa says:

    This will really get Scooter upset (he already censored the Bashir interview). And it will be a counter to C and C sympathizers who still talk badly about Diana.

    • QuiteContrary says:

      I just hope it’s done right.

      Because Diana deserves to be heard. William is a disgrace for quashing the Bashir interview. Nothing about what Bashir did to get the interview changes what Diana wanted to say.

  2. Shiela Kerr says:

    If Richard Kay, Ken Wharfe amd Dickie Arbiter are involved in this, it has the potential to be messy. Never heard of the others except Morton. I cannot even imagine how Prince Harry must feel about this, he appears to have loved his mom dearly and tries very hard to keep a positive view of her life and legacy.

    • Tessa says:

      It can be distorted like the last season of the Crown. Hopefully it won’t. There have already been programs about Morton and how he got involved in the project, using a go between with the tapes and Diana answering questions.

    • lemon&lime says:

      I dunno….it makes sense — Richard Kay was one of Diana’s favorites and Dickie was the press secretary at the time. Dickie will be problematic because a) he’s really old now and b) he’s the Crown’s man all the way.

      However, if he could do some honest reflection after all of this time it has the potential to be quite interesting to hear the Crown’s perspective. Shrug

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Richard Kay being one of Diana’s favorites doesn’t mean she liked him. There was a big game afoot. Diana engaged in the game because she needed to with all of Charles’ fuckery. Ken Wharfe has been attributed to saying negative things about Diana. Sell out.

        I’m not interested in seeing this docu series with certain elements involved. Just like Tina Brown’s book years ago re: H&M, the WanKs. I boohooed it from the beginning along with others. What I’m interested in hearing is the amount of AI involved with changing Diana’s words.

        If the docu series makes her less than her strength. Smoking gun. hope my belief isn’t true.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    How is this docuseries going to be any different to “Diana in her own words”? Some of the names involved are questionable too. We’ll see. I’d love for Harry to do a documentary about Diana but I don’t think that will happen.

    • Becks1 says:

      Those were my thoughts. I found In Her Own Words pretty interesting but some of the names attached here (Arbiter, Kay) have me a little skeptical.

      I can see harry producing a documentary that focuses on her charity work, especially AIDS or the Halo Trust.

      But not a documentary about the tabloid aspects of her life.

      • Amy Bee says:

        The documentary Our Mother which Harry and William participated for the 20th anniversary of Diana death talked about her work with Halo Trust and AIDS. Harry went to Sarajevo to meet people she visited there just before her death in the documentary. So I’m not sure Harry would want to repeat that. So, I’m thinking if he does anything it would be more expansive than just her work.

  4. Mads says:

    I’d love it if there’s information to blow apart the “star crossed lovers” shtick and that they’re brave enough to use it.

  5. J Blake says:

    Charles, Camilla and now the heir go hard against Diana’s memory even now – and her spirit, too, by attacking good king Harry – even as they waged a press war against her in the eighties, when she was barely an adult with two little children. Her memory should be kept alive with her own words, spoken in self defense, and as a reminder not to trust the Windsors

  6. Blair Warner says:

    Diana was magic. Her photos are luminous.

  7. tamsin says:

    I haven’t read Morton’s book, but the National Geographic bio “In Her Own Words” based on Diana’s tapes with her speech coach changed my thoughts on Diana completely. I wasn’t sure about what to believe about the royal propaganda put out on her until I saw it. Until then, I saw how problematic Charles was, but I also thought Diana had some problems too. Now, we all realize how alone and brave Diana was, that she had a sense of self, and fought for it.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles minions were trying to create the “damaged” Diana scenario and blame HER for Charles cheating. Even one of Mountbatten’s elderly daughters called Diana “damaged.” It was right out of the Move Gaslight. It was disgraceful that anti Diana propaganda was out there.

  8. YankeeDoodles says:

    Diana’s story is still genuinely affecting because you have to peel back the layers, as well as the assumptions people made, in telling her story, or interpreting her behaviour, and you get the impression she had to deconstruct and rebuild a lot of her own assumptions, in real time. It’s a process that reflects a throwback to a time when what we call patriarchy, now, accurately, was the default setting, and its defences were mostly rooted in a politics of respectability. Diana’s revelation was how hollow that world was, and how little there was, for her, in it.

  9. BeanieBean says:

    That necklace on Diana in the top photo, with the POW symbol? You would think Kate would be wearing that by now. Was it Diana’s personal property; if so, I would guess because of the symbolism it would have gone to William for his eventual wife. Huh. Wonder why we haven’t seen Katie Keen in it.

    • Paisley25 says:

      The diamond necklace and the PoW brooch are two separate pieces. Kate has worn the brooch a few times with and without the emerald drop. I’m sure that was returned to the Crown after the divorce or her death like her pearl tiara and emerald choker. I think the diamond necklace came from the Saudi sapphire suite. I don’t know if that went back to the Crown or to her estate. I’m not sure if Harry and William ever got around to officially dividing all the jewels before their break.

  10. Amy says:

    Even this many years later, every time I see a picture of Diana with Harry and/or William, I’m struck by how much she LOVED them. Visibly, palpably adored them. So much could have been different had her time not been cut so short.

    • Calliope says:

      So loved, so safe. The boys look so engaged (as she does) in the family picture of the 4 of them (I hadn’t seen it before). It’s all so sad for so many reasons.

  11. Dot Gingell says:

    It’s amazing that those tapes still exist – I suppose AM has been keeping them under tight security and has backup copies. The RF might have ‘quashed’ the Bashir interview but they can’t do anything about the recordings Diana made voluntarily. WTF are Dickie Assbiter and Kay contributing to this new doc?

    • Magdalena says:

      I saw an article mention that “the tapes are owned by Dr. James Colthurst”. First I’ve ever heard of him.

  12. Magdalena says:

    Dickie Arbiter and Richard Kay? Ugh.
    And Ken Wharfe? Ugh. And ugh.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment