Eden: The British monarch will probably never live in Buckingham Palace again

Next year, the ten-year renovation project on Buckingham Palace will finally be completed. If British contractors are anything like American contractors, the palace might not be move-in ready until 2030 though. But sure, for argument’s sake, let’s say that the £369 million renovation job will be completed next year. We’ve known for years that King Charles has no intention of moving into BP when the reno is completed. He and Camilla are happy at Clarence House and their plan was always to stay there and “use” BP as an office, for events and meetings. When the Prince and Princess of Wales moved into Forest Lodge last year, we also heard that they have zero inclination to move into BP when Scooter King is on the throne as well. So, a massively costly renovation for a palace where no king or queen will ever be in residence again. This is the story behind Richard Eden’s Mail column this week.

[Queen Elizabeth’s] move to Windsor coincided with an extensive renovation programme at Buckingham Palace, which began in 2017. The Government allocated a staggering £369million of taxpayers’ money for the scheme. At the time, royal aides rejected claims that Prince Charles intended to use it as a sort of ‘monarchy HQ’ rather than his residence, Clarence House, when he eventually became king. ‘Buckingham Palace will remain the official residence of the monarch,’ said a statement from Clarence House.

Since King Charles ascended the throne in 2022, he and Queen Camilla have, however, stayed at Clarence House, which he inherited from his beloved grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, after her death two decades earlier. Unlike Winston Churchill, no prime minister has told the King to move to Buckingham Palace. And this has left some prominent royalists disappointed.

As I reported in my social diary column, Eden Confidential, in the Daily Mail today, interior designer Nicky Haslam, an old friend of Queen Camilla, warned that it would be a grave mistake for her and the King not to live at the palace.

‘Turning Buckingham Palace into an office is wrong. Period,’ said the Old Etonian, 86, whose mother, Diamond Ponsonby, was one of Queen Victoria’s goddaughters. ‘William won’t use it either. It stops Buckingham Palace being the jewel in the crown.’ Haslam believes that the palace would lose its appeal to tourists if it was no longer a royal residence. ‘If people think it’s an office they won’t go there,’ he said.

I have noticed myself that stately homes still used by their titled owners seem to be more attractive to visitors. Part of the appeal of Chatsworth in Derbyshire, for example, is that the Duke of Devonshire’s family live there. When I visited Arundel Castle, in West Sussex, recently, there were new photographs of the Duke of Norfolk and his family on display in the rooms open to the public, which added to its charms.

It’s easy to see why the King and Queen prefer Clarence House, an elegant family home, to the vast Buckingham Palace with its 775 rooms. Yet it’s their duty to move out.

I hear whispers, however, that Their Majesties will never live at the palace. ‘Buckingham Palace will be used for royal events,’ a source tells me. ‘There will be investitures, receptions and banquets, but the King and Queen won’t sleep there.’

This leaves me worried for the future of the monarchy. The King’s grandfather, George VI, and his wife, Queen Elizabeth, defied Adolf Hitler and remained at Buckingham Palace throughout the war, even during the nine occasions when German bombs fell on it. Churchill knew the symbolic power of the King being at the nation’s home. That is why the Government agreed to spend £369 million of taxpayers’ money on restoring the palace to its former glory. For King Charles to abandon it at a time of peace would be a serious mistake.

[From The Daily Mail]

The larger problem is that the monarchy is in their “who gonna check me, boo” era. While the Windsors are facing a steep decline in popularity and relevancy, they have never been more well-funded and coddled by medieval bureaucracy. Prince Andrew is likely going to skate by with little more than a slap on the wrist (if that). Prince Edward and Sophie will continue to live in their huge mansion and siphon money from the taxpayers. Charles will continue to travel among his eleventy billion homes, castles, palaces and estates. William will continue to hide out at Forest Lodge and Norfolk, doing f–k all. There’s not even a real public pressure campaign to “force” these people to “live in a palace.”

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Eden: The British monarch will probably never live in Buckingham Palace again”

  1. moldyoldy says:

    I don’t think anyone who visits Buckingham Palace cares if anyone actually lives there. Let it be a Palace-Museum-Ceremonial building. Honestly, this whole argument just feeds into the lie that somehow the monarchy is needed for “tourism”.

    • LRB says:

      Except if that is the case why is the huge renovation making so much private space for homes for the royals? That is my tax payer £ and if the whole building is going to be a museum then spend the money accordingly. Will State banquets be held there still? If Windsor works, why not stick with Windsor and save on all the kitchens needed, just as an example. Bathrooms – ( as in what we English call a bathroom not a loo) – won’t be needed if no one is living there. The expense is enormous and made worse if the space is not going to be used in the way the work is assuming. Personally I think it should be all public spaces – the State rooms etc open to the public, but so much more use could be made of all the other space. They family have lots of other more sensible options for actual living.

  2. tamsin says:

    They should open up BP to the public completely then. The building should pay for itself, right?

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      Well let’s make it a hotel then, I wanna sleep there if i’m travelling in London!!!

      Part museum, exhibition, part hotel…

  3. Bqm says:

    It’s great actually. They can open more of BP, have more and larger exhibits, and open all areas year round rather than part open just in the summer. That raises a lot of money. Tons of people visit Hampton court without royals living there. And visit palaces in Russia, France and Germany where they haven’t lived for a century or more. Eden’s an idiot. It’s not like people visit Windsor or Kensington thinking they’ll bump into a royal. We see public areas not family ones as well.

    • Becks1 says:

      Yeah, the comparison to great country estates doesnt fly – I think people ARE more likely to visit Chatsworth or Arundel or Althorp or Alnwick etc if they have any idea of the family that is connected to the house. there are just too many of those houses in the UK; if you’re picking a few to visit, you’re going to go to one that you have heard of for whatever reason.

      Buckingham Palace people have heard of, lol. Open it up year round, open more rooms, have more exhibits, etc. the royal family can still use it for their balcony moments and big events.

      The most obvious reason not to do this is cost – with the royal family scattered in various houses, the upkeep and security costs are increased. but that’s sort of inevitable. Even if C&C moved to BP I’m assuming another royal would use Clarence house.

  4. Juniperus says:

    The tourists will visit it *more* because you’re literally only allowed to tourize the place when the monarch is not in residence.

    I mean seriously, does he think that all the people going to Versailles are bummed out because the king doesn’t sleep there?

  5. Kreama says:

    PC looks like he’s playing dress-up on the throne.

  6. YankeeDoodles says:

    Charles rightfully should be a natural here, this is totally in his wheelhouse: curating exhibits & concerts, book fairs, interfaith summits on current events for dialogue, & engagement, opera, open air performances of Shakespeare, garden parties, poetry readings…. Symposia on philosophical questions, he could do so much with that space. Go crazy! You’re halfway there. JK.

  7. Truthiness says:

    Buckingham Palace has had a bad rodent problem since the 1800s. I wonder if they’ve conquered that or if the old foundation can never be truly sealed up. Trump said he’s always wanted to live there, he’d fit right in. 🐀

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment