Tom Cruise’s agent Maha Dakhil was criticized for praising ‘Backrooms’ & ‘Obsession’

There’s nothing that angers Hollywood executives more than a small-budget film finding huge box office success. The fact that there are currently two inexpensively-produced films raking it in at the box office has turned into a full-on catastrophe for many studios. These are the same studios who just want to make sequels, remakes and anything with a known IP. Those studios will cut $150 million checks for Play-Doh: The Untold Story or Avengers 7: Nobody Wants This. But those studio heads would have balked at the very idea of spending $750K to make Obsession, or $10 million for Backrooms. Well, Tom Cruise’s CAA agent Maha Dakhil is getting studio lashings for admitting what should be obvious: that the success of Backrooms and Obsession is amazing for the film industry and that directors Kane Parsons and Curry Barker are ushering in another age of exciting, small-budget films which speak to a younger audience.

Maha Dakhil just can’t catch a break. The outspoken CAA super-agent who represents everyone from Tom Cruise to Natalie Portman to Anne Hathaway, recently told attendees as part of a Forbes Iconoclast Summit in New York on June 3 that filmmakers don’t necessarily need film executives to execute their vision.

“We are seeing that we don’t even need studios to green-light ideas. We just need talent and courage,” said Dakhil who, we are told, was referencing the breakout hits “Obsession” and “Backdoors” which have prompted all sorts of chest-beating within a Hollywood desperate for any hopeful news about the future of moviemaking.

Well, it turns out Dakhil’s comments rankled some actual studio executives, some of whom sit on the greenlight committees for major studios. Says one: “Is Tom Cruise going to self-fund? Is the Church of Scientology going to pay for everything he does? How do you make ‘Digger’? Who pays for that?”

“Digger,” of course, is Warner Bros.’ upcoming Cruise movie that costs anywhere from $125 million to $200 million, depending on who you ask. A Warners rep says the budget of the Alejandro González Iñárritu-directed, black comedy is $125 million, while a studio insider says it is “pushing a $200 million, which is insane.” Either way, it represents a figure that can only be approved by a … studio. Asks another top manager, “Does CAA really want her out in the world talking like that?”

But other veteran execs involved with the breakout projects have been publicly making the rounds praising the films on panels, and even chastising Hollywood studios, with no blowback. Jason Blum, an executive producer of “Obsession,” likened Barker and Parsons’ films in a recent talk at the producers guild to nothing less than the ’70s new wave of cinema.

And Peter Chernin, the former Fox exec turned producer who co-financed “Backrooms” with A24, told “The Town” of the big studios, “You can’t just live on sequels, you can’t just live on IP… [the major studios] should be taking risks.” (Chernin also told CNBC of any impending copycats, ″I guarantee you 80% will be failures… Your job is to innovate… not to just jump on a bandwagon.”)

One unintended consequence of the back-to-back success of “Obsession” and “Backdoors” is the casting of a spotlight on Hollywood’s generational divide. Across the industry, on the Monday after “Backrooms” opened, boomer studio honchos sat down with their younger millennial and Gen Z staff and earnestly asked their advice on how to harness the power of YouTube. To some, it feels like a classic bandwagon moment that a generation of top executives will undoubtedly squander.

One meme that was making the rounds featured a suited executive standing over his assistant with the line: “My boss making me find the next Kane Parsons or Curry Barker by EOD.”

[From Page Six]

The thing about Tom Cruise’s agent speaking positively about Obsession and Backrooms is that I can pretty much guarantee that Cruise agrees with her. Tom Cruise is Mr. Hollywood, and while he loves a big, costly studio production, he absolutely supports ALL unique filmmakers, even the young guys working with indie budgets. I bet Cruise has already called Parsons and Barker to congratulate them. That’s what it should be like, rather than all of this sniping and jealousy. ALL of the studios should have seen Obsession and Backrooms’ success as a hugely positive moment for the industry as a whole.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

13 Responses to “Tom Cruise’s agent Maha Dakhil was criticized for praising ‘Backrooms’ & ‘Obsession’”

  1. Lala11_7 says:

    She’s a WOMAN saying this correct viewpoint…so…😕

  2. Meri says:

    I think I remember reading a story once about Cruise helping “Lock Stock & Two Smoking Barrels” get through the quagmire of movie production back in the day, and it turned out to be a cult classic. The man is out of his mind, but I do believe that he genuine cares about The Craft Of Movies.

  3. AngryJayne says:

    I don’t quite get why everyone was surprised by this. It happened years ago in 2016 with Lights Out. A movie was made by a known YouTube creator, it had a budget of $4.9 million, and went on to make $148 million. Good original material with a built-in audience…
    I mean it’s not rocket science lol

  4. Eurydice says:

    The Blair Witch Project – cost about $50,000 to make and grossed about $250 million. And these are the same people who are consistently blindsided when a women-centric film becomes a success – who knew women go to the movies?.

  5. Jegede says:

    Not gonna lie, the jab at Scientology made me 😁😁😁😁.

  6. Gah says:

    I just checked- the amazing digital circus finale episode did nearly 40 million in a weekend. It’s a YT animated series. We saw it in NYC bc my daughter loves it. The crowds were mixed ages skewing younger and came out in droves.

    Studio execs are out of touch and antiquated. These sorts of successes should be celebrated by the industry.

  7. MFS says:

    Tom Cruise is deeply (DEEPLY) problematic but one thing I can’t fault him for is his support for fellow filmmakers.

  8. Tn Democrat says:

    We have literally watched Zaslav gleefully destroy a massive conglomerate of Hollywood properties so he can get a massive payout for chosing to tank the company and never being held accountable for his intentionally bad business decisions. Tens of thousands will lose their jobs and the massive WB/HBO/Discovery catalogs will picked over for destruction. Modern Hollywood is about questionable accounting and the “activities” that can been hidden on those massive balance sheets. The tech bros don’t care if people have jobs or about making good art. They care about enriching the .00001%, hiding the $/cr!m!nal activity in the balance sheets and stoking the culture wars to distract from their grift. The idea that the public is tiring of prequels, sequels and remakes would scare the pants off them because that is the entire business model now. Also. She is a smart and successful woman. Weak men hate women and are no longer afraid to openly admit it because of the embigging effect the tangerine terror has on weak men.

  9. SarahMcK says:

    Obsession is the first movie that my kids all wanted to see without me bringing it up. They are all Gen Z. They organized to go together and had a great time. I heard it was terrifying and was glad not to be invited. 😉

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      I saw it at the weekend and the showing I was in was busy – I enjoyed it, while it was slow to get going (then crammed a lot in in the last part) there was also some plot consistency issues (I think they missed a trick over the whole wish backstory) but overall it was a good movie.

  10. sunny says:

    Tom is a cult member and has some really terrible opinions (and a bad father) but literally no one LOVES movies and the film industry more than him.

    He has supported indie films, international films, other blockbusters. I’m sure his agent and everyone he works with shares the same position.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment