King Charles ‘intervened’ to guarantee the Sussexes’ security in the UK next month

This week, the British media announced that Prince Harry, Meghan and their two children plan to visit the UK next month. Most of the visit is about the Invictus One Year to Go events in Birmingham, but people obviously expect King Charles to at least spend a little bit of time with his grandkids. Throughout all of the discussion, there have been questions about security and whether Harry would bring Meghan and the kids to the UK if he wasn’t completely sure that they could be safe. RAVEC and the Home Office have still not made any kind of ruling on whether the Sussexes would get “automatic” security whenever they’re in the UK. But the Sun has just reported something interesting – Harry has apparently received assurances from his father that the Sussex family will have security, and Charles will pick up whatever extra cost there is.

Harry and Meghan will jet to the UK with their kids after King Charles offered to help cover their security arrangements, it is claimed. The Home Office has still granted taxpayer-funded round-the-clock armed police protection for their trip next month.

A review of the threat level posed to the couple has been ongoing and has not led to a change in security arrangements. But the King is believed to have intervened to offer his own resources so the couple can bring their two children Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, over for their first visit in four years.

Harry, who stepped back from royal duties when he moved to California, lost a legal case against the Home Office last year when it downgraded his security. He later said it was not safe to bring his family to the UK. But this week a “safe return” for a five-day visit was said to now be possible after “changes” to security arrangements.

However, sources said the Government’s Royal and VIP Executive Committee had not upgraded its threat level. A Government spokesman said of its protective security system: “It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”

Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes, scheduled to be at Harry’s Invictus Games in Birmingham, declined to comment.

[From The Sun]

First thing: this is all about face-saving for RAVEC and the Home Office, not to mention Buckingham Palace. As I said, Harry has them over a barrel, and they’re terrified about what Harry would do or say if they rejected his family’s security needs outright. This arrangement sounds like a completely typical – meaning “half-assed” – British arrangement to save face at an institutional level while still providing security. Second thing: this arrangement, with the sovereign basically intervening and picking up any additional security costs, is exactly what Queen Elizabeth did for the Sussexes when they visited twice in 2022. That is exactly what Harry had argued in his lawsuits as well, and this has been his position since 2022 – that his father could easily intervene, just as QEII did, to assure the Sussex family’s security. Charles never “intervened” before because he’s a rotten old man who wanted to keep the Sussexes away and/or put them in as much danger as possible.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

33 Responses to “King Charles ‘intervened’ to guarantee the Sussexes’ security in the UK next month”

  1. JayBlue says:

    So we’re just confirming that chuck had the power to do this all along, huh?

    • Hypocrisy says:

      That’s exactly what this confirms with out a doubt also that he is the one who has blocked them from getting security for years now.

    • Swaz says:

      Why is it that Charles never loved his two sons 😳😳

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        Chuck Amuck has only ever loved himself, and all his decisions are driven by his own needs, whims, and desires, not anyone else’s.

        Even when he capitulates to Mari Lwyd, it’s because he’s getting some self perceived benefit from it.

      • Gabby says:

        Partly because Charles’ own parents never loved him and didn’t even bother to pretend

  2. Jane says:

    Doing what they should have done all along but this way making Charles look good, whilst also confirming that security can be paid for? these people are so stupid.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    If this is true, better late than never. This is what Charles should’ve been doing from the start.

    • Jegede says:

      Reminds me of how Charles hopped on Harry’s bandwagon after Trump’s disgraceful comments about British troops.

      Harry had the gumption to go after the US President, while HM – Commander of the Armed Forces – dragged his feet.

      Then Chuck got all the credit.👹👹👹👹👹👹

    • Becks1 says:

      It is absolutely what Charles should have been doing from the start and PR wise I don’t know why he didn’t. It’s much better to say “Harry is denying me my grandkids” than “I won’t ensure my grandkids safety when they’re here.”

      But better late than never.

    • Kat says:

      I believe these talks have been going on for a while now, l.suppose we knew when we saw both teams in London outside having a coffee meeting, so l think definitely they wanted us to know their is progress ..lm v happy about it,. sincerely l hope all goes well for both parties, can u image de Drama over there in de Lodge , that awful looking place…

  4. M says:

    I still don’t buy that they are all going to visit. This is just Charles trying to get ahead of it so he can take credit.

    • Beverley says:

      Agreed. Chuckles finally read the room. He wants all the credit for doing something he could have done years ago. I guess he figured it wasn’t a good look if he hightailed it and ran every time his son came around. Not to mention his legacy if he continues to ignore/avoid his part-Black grandchildren. He’ll never change. C3 only does what’s best for C3. He just drops the ball frequently and will never do the right thing for the right reasons.

  5. sunniside up says:

    The Sun is having fun muddying the water.

    • Emm1 says:

      Bear in mind it’s the Scum who are reporting this. Never knowingly truth seekers or truth speakers.

    • Jegede says:

      The Scum is 100% in bed with the BRF.

      The Windsors are TERRIFIED of Murdoch and his papers.

      Remember how they gave Arthur Edwards exclusive view for shots of Prince Philip’s coffin.

      This was 100% fed to the Scum by the palace.

  6. Julia says:

    What a world salad from the Sun. The Home Office hasn’t upgraded its threat level! What does that mean? There is no indication they have done a detailed risk assessment since 2019 so how can the threat level change without a risk assessment?
    This is a face saving arrangement because they know that if they did a risk assessment they would have to provide security every time Harry visited or risk being publicly embarrassed by him!

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      The narrative that Harry and his family don’t need top notch security while visiting the UK has always been insane to me. The way the royals and their propaganda outlets in the media have demonized both H&M makes it absolutely necessary. And it really has made me doubt the narrative they have tried to spin about Diana’s rejection of security.

      • CatGotMyTongue says:

        I will never believe that she rejected security.

        Especially not after what went down in Canada when Harry and Meghan moved. Not to even mention NYC!

        It was a hit.

        I’ve been saying this for decades and at first I was soundly mocked for it. Even here. The minute I saw the tabs I was like, damn. They bumped her off.

  7. Amie says:

    I still don’t believe any of this. Until they confirm it themselves or we see them in the UK.

    • SussexWatcher says:

      Same. And if they do all end up coming, I’d be curious to know what’s changed that gives Harry and Meghan confidence that they’ll actually be safe and not have their plans and locations leaked every step of the way. Wasn’t it Chuckles who leaked their Canada location, prompting Tyler Perry to swoop in to bring the family to safety?

      And I also believe that if the Sussex family is given any lodging in a royal residence (which I’ll bet is a requirement if Chuckles really does have a hand in any of this), there will be leaks and stories about the family from the word go.

      • 2131Jan says:

        I thought Scooter/KP leaked it. Six of one, half doz. of another… Either way, it was done with malice.

      • Carmen says:

        @2131Jan. Didn’t he leak Harry’s location when he was in Afghanistan?

  8. Jais says:

    So a monarch can pay for security? But Harry wasn’t allowed to pay for his security? Is that how it is? Good to know the king’s courts works for the kings and not equality. Anyways, I’ll believe it when I see it.

  9. line says:

    If this were proven to be true, RAVEC, the Home Office, and even Buckingham Palace would have acted solely out of political strategy. The British government was once again preparing to implement further austerity measures, which risk undermining already fragile public services. Keir Starmer is highly unpopular, and the royal family is as well. The year 2026 has also been marked by numerous demonstrations by far-right groups, which have sparked several racially motivated riots across the United Kingdom, including the pogrom that took place in Belfast. Therefore, they may need to make use of the Sussexes’ image and popularity in order to improve their own public standing.

    Personally, I do not believe this has anything to do with a genuine desire for reconciliation of Charles. In my view, it is more likely an attempt to exploit his son and grandchildren for public relations purposes, as I believe he has done before. I see this as consistent with what I consider to be a highly self-interested and narcissistic approach.

    • SussexWatcher says:

      I agree 💯, especially with your last paragraph. If any of this is true, I think it’s solely so Chuckles can use the Sussex family for his own gain. He’s proven that he’s not a generous or caring person, even toward his own son and grandchildren.

  10. YankeeDoodles says:

    This is just Charles’ power trip. Narcissists acknowledge no principle so see no need to be consistent. They contradict themselves frequently, and it can be baffling for those of us who lived with them as parents. They will literally turn to wherever the applause is coming from, and if you react in bafflement — like, that’s the opposite of what you said yesterday — they make out like you’re a spoiler and they tend to play the victim. But this is a power move. Now it suits Charles to do what serves his own interest. As the late Queen urged Harry, Charles does what Charles wants to do. And only what he wants to do. Duty is just an excuse. Or a pretext.

  11. Sure says:

    That miserly, old racist paying the security costs for H, his biracial wife and children? I don’t believe it. I’m more inclined to believe that H&M are paying themselves. This report that KFC is picking up the tab disguises that H&M are being allowed to pay for their own security despite the court ruling otherwise.

  12. Becks1 says:

    Obviously we have no idea if this is true – but the story itself is contradictory. It says they will have round the clock taxpayer funded security and then Charles will pick up the tab for the rest? Is the security only for Invictus events?

    But anyway I think it’s been clear over the last week that something has shifted. The news that the kids were coming tells us the security was figured out. Harry and Meghan aren’t risking those kids for anything.

  13. another cross to carry says:

    Charles will have the full itinerary and thus the media. I am really not liking any of this. If those children go to see charles, photos of the children’s faces WILL be leaked! That is my big fear. The family and the family-controlled british media are so corrupt, I will NEVER EVER trust them to do good/right! Sorry for being a party pooper.

    • Carmen says:

      I’m with you, but H&M will have thought this through. I also hate that this will give these pseudo-journalists fodder for the next year. But Harry’ deserves access to his only parent. What he does not deserve this continued rejection from KCIII. The righteousness of these people is appalling.

  14. QuiteContrary says:

    Harry is smart. He’s not going to take chances with his family’s safety. Neither is Meghan.

  15. Duch says:

    Well stepping back from the details a bit, I’m really excited for the Sussexes & for KC. So glad this is happening for all concerned. Family is important & they’ve finally found a way to make it happen. Big moment. Huge!

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment