The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are almost definitely planning to visit the UK in July, and it’s very likely that they’ll bring their children. Team Sussex still hasn’t confirmed anything, which I find interesting. Or maybe not, you know? We’ve always known that the palace leaks like a sieve, and here’s further evidence of that. What I find chilling is the idea that these stories are not completely coming from the palace though, that the leaks might be coming from police and/or government sources with knowledge of the arrangements around the visit. Given that Harry gave the police/Home Office 30 days notice (as he’s supposed to, to get security), the timing of all of these stories makes sense. So, now that the British media is riled up, it’s apparently time to reveal that King Charles apparently offered Prince Harry and his family some kind of royal accommodation.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will stay at a royal residence with their children when they return to the UK next month, The Telegraph can reveal. The family was offered both accommodation and security provision by the King in a move that signalled a clear desire to be reunited with his young grandchildren.
Prince Harry had long planned to travel back to the UK to attend events marking the one-year countdown to the Invictus Games 2027 in Birmingham.But his decision to bring Meghan, as well as Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, was made only recently following assurances from Buckingham Palace. The invitation to stay within the security cordon of a royal residence meant the Duke felt confident enough to bring his wife and children back for the first time in four years.
He is said to be looking forward to introducing them to family and friends as well as aspects of royal and British culture they do not experience growing up in Montecito, California. He had previously said that without adequate, state-backed protection they would not be safe, and that he could not risk putting them “in danger”.
The Duke was offered accommodation at Buckingham Palace in 2024 but turned it down because he did not have police protection. The entrances and exits to the palace are so exposed he believed he would be a “sitting duck”. This time, however, the palace gave assurances that the family would also receive security.
The full extent of that provision is not yet known. The Duke has not heard back from the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), the Home Office committee responsible for such decisions, despite sharing his travel plans within the allotted time frame.
He will attend several events promoting the one-year countdown to Invictus as well as some involving his remaining patronages which include WellChild and Scotty’s Little Soldiers.
The Duchess’s attendance at the Invictus events has not been confirmed. However, she has been a staunch supporter of the initiative ever since making her first official appearance alongside the Duke at the 2017 Games in Toronto, regularly addressing the athletes and cheering them on from the stands.
It is not yet known whether the children will be seen at any official events. The Duke and Duchess have long protected their privacy but are aware they cannot do so forever.
“The Duke and Duchess have long protected their privacy but are aware they cannot do so forever.” I find that chilling as well, it’s basically a slow reveal that the British press has put a bounty on photos of Archie and Lili’s faces. The British media will claim that “Harry and Meghan know that they can’t hide their kids forever.” Incidentally, I don’t believe Archie and Lili are going to any public events either. I think they’re being included on this trip specifically so they can spend time with Charles.
The Mail is already wondering aloud about which “royal residence” will be used to house the Sussex fam, and they suggest St. James’s Palace, Windsor Castle or Sandringham. Keep in mind, the Sussexes will be in Birmingham for two days, and I bet they’ll be staying in a hotel there. Then they’ll be in London for WellChild and maybe some other events, so… a London accommodation would probably be best for a day or two. It would be funny as hell if they went to Norfolk for a weekend with King Charles though. Prince William would completely lose his mind.
Photos courtesy of Meghan’s Instagram.
Wouldn’t be a bad idea, once the kids have met Chuck, to have them stay with a Spencer aunt, or at Althorpe, while M&H are in Birmingham. Protected, and not in the “royal leak zone”. You know the media maggots will try and stick on M&H like white on rice, and follow them back to where they are staying. I will never *not* think of that cab chase in Manhattan, and that was w/out the kids in tow! Can you imagine just how rabid the press will be to get a glimpse of Archie and Lili?? Gives me chills to think of how they wouldn’t give an iota of thought that they’d be putting the kids in danger.
Totally agree. Harry’s uncle ancestral home seems the better alternative to a royal resident.
Not only is it less than 50 miles from Birmingham, it’s been closed to the public for two days 10th and 11th July. And I think St James’ Palace in London as it’s close to Clarence House (for Charles) with very tight security.
The way things go with the Windsors, they may now be publicly offering the use of a royal residence just because they got wind that Harry might be planning to stay with the Spencers.
@jay – you’ré on to something there. I’d bet a dollar to a doughnut that this was indeed part of the negotiations. It either expressly happened (just like the tiara) or KC knew it was a distinct possibility & couldn’t bear the embarrassment of H & family staying for 2 weeks with Chas Spencer
I agree with Jay: it’s the Spencer tiara story all over again.
@Jay … Those are my thoughts as well.
If a royal residence is offered, it will likely once again be Buckingham Palace, which is still not safe with work crews–and anyone else–coming in and out at will during current renovations.
I hope they stay with Uncle Earl Charles Spencer on his Althorp Estate for the Invictus events and at St. James’ Palace or with Charles at Clarence House for everything else. I don’t trust William at Windsor.
Althrop is open to the public July and August but this year during Harry’s visit it is closing for 2 days…. that says it all I think. And Harry will be able to take his children to their granny’s grave. The Spencers have his back. They probably think, as I do, that they have got some things wrong, but they have grown into their new lives and are thriving and I am sure Diana’s family are incredibly proud of Harry – he is so like his mothers.
@Eurydice … They offered to let Harry stay in Buckingham Palace in 2024 without any royal security. I think they offer it to him because no other royals or royal adjacents are staying there during renovations. It’s probably a family snub.
“Here, darling boy, you and your little family can stay in Buckingham Palace during your visit. None of us would dare, but it’s good enough for you.”
But, does Althorp have royal protection?
It is a well secure spot. Harry does not have royal protection. He might stay in an enclosed space that has security. Same as his own house in California.
@Julie – my point is that if Harry and the family stay on royal grounds they will automatically have royal protection. And if the children have to stay behind because of some events, then they will be protected beyond what Harry can provide.
Eurydice – we saw what happened with Prince Archie’s nursery fire when he had “royal protection,” so that, in and of itself, isn’t an indicator of safety or better protection than Harry and Meghan’s teams. And even, probably, Earl Spencer’s estate where I’ll bet the staff won’t be selling stories or photos to the tabloids. It seems certain that Harry has stayed at Althorpe several times and no one has been any wiser. I wouldn’t trust a royal residence to be secure (think also of the guy making into the queen’s bedroom!) or leak-proof.
wouldn’t surprise me if the kids stayed with one of the Spencers, who they have seen multiple times. plus I’m sure that Harry wants them to see where his mom rests. wonder if Daria is coming too?
The Sussex family should be travelling in a car with tinted glasses AT ALL TIMES while in the UK. That’s the only way to avoid the crazed paparazi on mortorbikes. I hope H&M are insisting on such provision in that toxic environment!
Lucy – 💯! The papers are already printing which events Harry plans to attend. They are already making the family less secure by publicizing their (presumed) schedule.
I hope they have tinted windows, back entrances, and anything else to keep them secure.
And who is leaking all of this information anyway? If I were the Sussexes, I’d change my plans now (no royal residences) since no one there can keep things confidential and in fact, may be putting information into the public arena intentionally so that the family are less safe or harassed. I would have done it as a test and if information made it into the papers then I’d know you cannot trust Chuckles or Scooter’s minions on the ravec board.
I am hoping that they stay with or near the Spencer family.
100% agree. Althorpe being closed for 2 days during Harry’s visit isn’t a coincidence and they beefed up security after fence jumpers there. The Spencers lost Diana, they’d never sell out Harry & his family’s location. The Windsors on the other hand are a vipers nest of a family and their history with Harry is freaking ruthless. I agree that it’s all too chilling.
The media wants access to those children as well as M&H. They’re going to monetize the hell out of this. Camilla & Will’s media contacts ensure there will be a bonfire of negative coverage. Is someone planning a car accident too?
Why do I think that if the kids DO go see Chuck, The Horse will be behind one of those paintings with the eyes cut out, and snap a pic to toss to her media buds. Joking, not joking… 😜😬
Scooby doo style paintings with Camilla behind them🤭
I trust H&M to know what, where and how to keep the kids safe if they do bring them.
I feel the same way Seaflower!
Oh absolutely, and I do believe they will bring private security along with the protection Chuck has arranged for them. I personally believe no one besides WanK wants anything to happen to that family on British soil.
This. There are reports that they might be in the uk for almost 2 weeks. Idk if that’s true at all, but if it’s true, the Sussexes already know where they’re staying. It’s been planned for a while. Now we hear about a royal residence stay? Agree with those above that it might be like the Spencer tiara all over again. But absolutely, if they are bringing the kids over, they already know what secure places those kids will be staying. And I’m betting the press has no idea. Aside from the possibility of althorpe. Bc if we’ve noticed those 2 days blocked off, you can bet that the press has noticed as well.
That last part is chilling because even if you do see their faces eventually, which of course will happen at some point, they still aren’t getting access to them. Or do they think oh we’ve seen their faces, so now Harry and Meghan have no choice but to bring them to Trooping to ride in a carriage or do the Christmas/Easter walk? They aren’t going to start having them do kid press conferences the way Harry and William did with the York sisters when they were younger.
I’m sure though they have a plan in place for them following them around if they attend. It’s hardly like they won’t be aware of their intentions, especially as that was also apparently a driving force behind a lot of the New York attempts. Trying to figure out if the kids were with them and where they were at as so they could stalk their nannies. With the way they have been acting I don’t blame them for not confirming anything. Plus they just saw how the media acted with the Australian embargo. I think they are going to move in silence a lot during this trip.
I think Archie and Lilli should wear cute animal face masks whenever out in public in the UK..even just riding in the car. I could see them having fun with that. 🙂
There are so many vacant royal residences that they could really go anywhere, but let me put my realtor hat on for Charles: A beautiful cottage, within the Windsor security perimeter, selected by the Queen herself for a growing family and extensively renovated at their own expense, so quite a bargain for the royals! Sadly, it has been sitting vacant for several years now, so it is available! And best of all, the two most troublesome neighbours have recently left.
Maybe if this visit goes well and they like Frogmore, a magnanimous monarch could consider renting it out to the Sussexes for future visits (at market rate, of course). It just might be perfect for them!
But is there still furniture in the cottage?
In what world would any self-respecting person lower themself to accept the offer of a property from which they were previously unjustly, shamefully, publicly and unceremoniously evicted?
Thank you, THIS. I’ve been shaking my head at some of these strange comments today.
To clarify – my comment above was sarcasm. Obviously it would be outrageous for them to wish to return to Frogmore nor for anyone to be grateful to be “granted” a chance to rent out their own former home. Next time I’ll attach the /s marker.
Absolutely agree! And I’m pretty sure the place has been wrecked by the tantrumy toddler Baldy by now.
@Jay — that was delicious!
Yeah they’re not going back to Frogmore Cottage and I don’t even think Charles would offer them that place. According to some reports Harry and Meghan shipped all their furniture to California.
Willy will FLIP if that happens. But I hope you’re right. One of the smartest things Charles could do is have Harry sign a ironclad 99 year lease like the one Pedo had for Royal Lodge. That way it’ll be impossible for William to take it away when he’s king.
I think the sussexes should stay away from scooter whether or not they get a lease
That would be funny as hell. If Charles left them a long lease in his will somewhere secure in the uk. But it would prob have to be market-rate which might financially saddle the Sussexes actually. The public would lose it if a peppercorn lease was given to them. To be clear, I don’t know that I see Charles doing that bc I don’t think he cares that much about the Sussex family. But it would be such a delicious way for him to stick it to William after he’s gone.
If chucky wants to redeem himself on his deathbed at this 11th hour as he finally realizes what his legacy will be (i:e an effete, ineffectual, spineless excuse for a man, husband, father, grandfather and king) we would bequeath Highgrove to H and his descendants in perpetuity. Just as how Highgrove became his personal property after Betty’s mother died.
What good did that 99-year lease do Andrew? He still got his a** thrown out.
Knowing these Windsors, they will offer the Sussexes a place that’s rife with past scandal, either from the Yorks or Wallis and her husband (sorry, don’t know the name), just to try to smear the Sussexes with their own scandals.
If this horrible grandfather really wants quality time with the grandchildren he should invite them to Highgrove. He has chickens there and gardens, things the children are used to.
I hope H&M do a full photo shoot with the kids’ faces fully visible on IG right when they get to London. I’m sure the paps will still be nuts for photos of the kids but hopefully not psychotic about it.
WHAT??? If there are literal DEATH THREATS against your children in multiple countries and the very real risk of kidnapping, would YOU do a full photo shoot with your children’s faces fully visible?
If there were an entire INDUSTRY making millions each day using what little likenesses of your children they have to spawn hundreds of false narratives each month, would you provide them with what they’ve always wanted: recent, full-faced photos of the children so that the vipers could make BANK recycling those photographs for years hence? Why reward them for their persistent harassment and ongoing stochastic terrorism?
SMH.
The Sussex children travel a lot and their privacy is respected by the people who come into contact with them. This will not happen with the British media. They already know full well what the children look like, they are hoping to exploit the lack of protection in the UK to profit from photographs of the children. Let them starve.
Honestly, no celebrity parent should be pressured into revealing their children’s faces because of media scrutiny. No Sussex supporter is genuinely upset about not seeing their children’s faces; it is mainly the media and some die-hard royalists who want that, so they can start a media-driven rivalry between Diana’s grandchildren by making endless physical comparisons, particularly between Lilibet and Charlotte. If they want to keep their children’s identities private until they reach adulthood, that is their right, and it should be respected.
hear, hear!
I thought about this and am keeping my fingers crossed that H&M can avoid revealing their kids faces for as long as they wish.
However, I also hope that when they feel that the time is right, they will do a magazine spread to coincidence with a milestone family event or some other significant reveal.
As to which mag……your guess is as good as mine but I’m thinking perhaps American Vogue.
Back in the days of the Tig I recall M saying in an article on the blog that she has very definitive boundaries between what’s personal vs what’s private. And that while she has ko problem sharing her personal preferences, likes, dislikes, ideas, etc., she will never share what she holds as private.
That makes absolutely no sense. Why feed the beast? Plus I think posed photos are probably of a greater value to the British press than ones taken at an event. It’s the reason why the press demanded photos of Archie from birth and why William and Kate give out photos of their children every year.
Except that there’s this little thing called copyright ownership. The fact that the family mag feature I suggested wd include posed photos doesn’t mean that any publisher could use them without permission. The British shitmedia get to use posed pix of the Wails because they have permission and in some cases, ownership.
Is the issue that photos of the kids will be sold to the highest bidder or that it will make the kids vulnerable to threats? I honestly can’t see how knowing what the kids look like will make them vulnerable. It’s not like random strangers will suddenly gain access because the kids will still always be surrounded by family.
@Gil, I agree with you. If someone wanted to do something evil to the children, it’s not exactly hard to pick out the two little redheads by H&M, faces or no faces.
To be honest I just feel saddened to think that one of the most powerful families in the world have let this happen to their own blood family ,
It’s just beyond belief that it has come to letting and enabling small children be put under real threat and harm .
Not just children but Royal children whose own grandfather has allowed this situation to happen ,.
It seems like fiction but unfortunately it’s real life .
All these disclosures about the visit and the children are concerning. They give the impression that the press and some royalists are effectively opening the door to a media hunt within the British press to
obtain photographs of these children, with or without their parents’ consent. Revealing that they may potentially stay at a royal residence is likely to attract even more paparazzi lurking around various royal residences. So, I’m wondering what’s going on. Is this a scheme to bury the funding surrounding the Wessex residence, or is there another scandal about to break concerning the Windsors?
I agree it’s really concerning. If they are coming I hope they are staying on someone’s estate (not Royal) where they can have a lovely English summer experience. There’s no way they can leave and be out in public without being hunted. I’m sad for the kids but they have the whole world to discover one day. England will never be safe for them.
It’s a stretch to say that an entire country will never be safe for the kids. People far more famous and wealthy than H&M have raised children out of the spotlight while continuing to lead normal lives and travel around the world. If they can go to Disney World without incident, certainly they can navigate the royal gauntlet of England.
It is extensive disturbing to think about.. but I’m sure both Harry and Meghan are hyper aware of all these possibilities.
I wonder if it’s finally dawning on Charles that Harry is probably the only person in his orbit who needs bsically nothing from him. Doesn’t need money, doesn’t need influence. Hopped on a plane as soon as he heard about his cancer diagnosis. Harry would like a relationship, which requires security for his and his family’s safety, but has shown he’s okay staying away if that’s not available.
Maybe one day Charles will go even further and realize Harry is someone he can be proud of. Harry always credits Diana’s influence on him, but she died when he was twelve, and the truth is that Charles, one of the most productive POW’s ever, must also have modeled who Harry is, at least in his work life. (Charles probably still can’t wrap his head around the idea that a man can have a personal life that doesn’t include a mistress.)
Most likely – because of Invictus – it’s true that Charles has guaranteed security for Harry and his family, for this trip. How much of the rest, the children coming, a place to stay, is also true remains to be seen, as does any future security options.
Charles pulled security from his son and daughter in law and grandson. When they were in Canada the time of pandemic. Charles is a bad father. The queen should have been protective of Diana afyer the divorce.
Yes, but that’s not what I’m talking about here.
In 2020, Charles was 70 (ish), plotting for his turn in the big chair. Six years later, he’s a man with cancer heading towards 80, not very popular, and with a wastrel son as immediate heir. He got what he most wanted for those first 70 years; he’s king, and his former mistress is queen. What now?
Meanwhile, since 2020 the tables have turned with respect to Harry. Back then, Charles/BP had almost complete control over Harry’s life. They threw him out and beat him down, but he landed on his feet, and then some. He’s becoming the global statesman the RF inadvertently trained him to be, since he did all the work Will couldn’t be bothered with. Now, a public connection between Charles and Harry is increasingly more to Charles’ benefit than Harry’s. Charles is weak, but he’s not stupid; he must at least sense the shift. Those media articles don’t land like they used to. There’s a reason Will is so panicked about Harry visiting.
As far as what now, well, time for Charles to look to his legacy. Part of that chapter is still to be written, and most of it will have little to do with Harry. But as an aging monarch well versed in Shakespeare, faced with a son who cares for him but is almost the only one in the family needing nothing from him, maybe Charles will finally get – what love is.
Or not…
There is no way on our Lord Dolly Partons green earth would I bring my kids around the BRF. This is the same family that formally denied Kate used hair extensions but had not a peep to say to condemn a baby Archie being compared to a chimpanzee.
Any interest Charles has in the Sussex family is purely as a weapon to get a win over Will and Kate or to distract from various illegality of the wider family.
There would be no reason for Lili and Archie to be at one year to go IG events so the press can chill out about that. I do agree that the British press does have a bounty on the children. As for the offer of royal accommodation, this story has been denied in DM and Times. So what is the truth? Plus what would have changed from when Harry turned down BP and St James’ Palace before? I have a hard time believing that Harry and Meghan would want to stay at a royal palace because staff would be spying on them all the time and leaking to the press.
Yeah, that’s my thing. The visit will go well and the events will be lovely. But if those kids stay at a royal residence, I worry about the aftermath, the stories about the kids that trickle out, with “sources” swearing it’s true, whether it is or not. All about their Americanisms, their accents and veiled xenophobic and racist commentary. But, we move. It’s gonna go down how it’s gonna go down.
I’m going to be careful here bc we know some of the Rota vultures read and sometimes boldly and without due credit or acknowledgment, directly quotes this site and the comments within, and/or create whole twisted articles from them. So I won’t speculate as to where I think the Sussexes will stay or their likely movements.
This entire “article” is disgusting, beginning with stating that the Sussexes will stay at a royal residence – they’ll definitely reveal the exact royal residence once they find out. How are they so certain that Harry hasn’t heard from RAVEC? Sounds like the BM has its own mole sitting on RAVEC. Which wouldn’t surprise me. They already revealed the reps from C-Rex and W that are on it. And why does RAVEC’s decision matter if C-Rex is providing their security? This “article” also specifically names Harry’s remaining patronages so the BM and hateful Sussex stalkers will stake those out as well. They are really hoping that Meghan and their children will attend the one year to go events so they can heap more abuse on them. I’m sure they’re already writing more disgusting articles based on these tidbits of info and have calculated the huge amount of money they’ll make off their Sussex diatribes.
“It is not yet known whether the children will be seen at any official events…the Duke and Duchess have long protected their privacy but are aware they cannot do so forever.” It not only sounds like, as Kaiser noted, the BM likely put bounties on the children’s photos, but it also sounds like a threat. And not a veiled one. Praying for the Sussexes throughout all of their UK events.
By the way BM, what’s the latest on the Pedo Prince Andrew investigations?
I hope we don’t know whether the children are there or not until the whole thing is over and they are safely back home.
We’re going to go through this whole thing again in a year anyway.
There are too many people in England who wish this family harm. I trust H&M but even they might not notice a hole in security, or someone with false ID or God knows what.
Question: Could they be calling Althorp a ‘royal residence’?
The way they are being stalked, the way the stories are coming out and they’re pretending the Sussex family leaks and people are still believing that crap, I just don’t feel they’re safe.
How can they prove, once and for all, it’s the rota and BaRF leaking, not the Sussexes.
“ There are too many people in England who wish this family harm.”
*adjusts tinfoil tiara*
Yes, and it only takes one. Especially if that one is motivated by incentives offered by Peg and has decent skills at clandestine planning.
All of this makes me so nervous. After the incident in NYC, I just don’t love them all being in London. I see why it’s necessary but the level of security and secrecy required is troubling.
I agree with Chantal this article by the The Telegraph is disgusting. These terrorists with press passes are vile and insane. The obsession with seeing Archie and Lili is demented. Harry and Meghan know what is best for THEIR children and the British press can go to Hell.
Well it probably they’ll stay in Windsor or Sandringham, it does look like from other peoples comments that they may also be staying with uncle Charles at grandma Diana for two days by the look of things! That will make the Palace go wild…I wonder whether Harry put all of this together with his uncle at the recent wedding, maybe Not who knows
“What I find chilling is the idea that these stories are not completely coming from the palace though, that the leaks might be coming from police and/or government sources with knowledge of the arrangements around the visit. Given that Harry gave the police/Home Office 30 days notice (as he’s supposed to, to get security), the timing of all of these stories makes sense.”
I still think it is coming from the Palace…they have representatives that are on the RAVEC panel and would know about the request, for who and for how long. And given how trooping went they would gladly shell out news like this as a distraction.
I agree with you… RAVEC itself is leaking to theoress, and that is perfect justification for Harry to cancel the visit. Not just Meg and the kids but his as well.
I meant to say “leaking to the press”, not “leaking to theoress”.
Harry have said in 2023 that he wanted his children to meet their cousins and learn about his birth country. As nothing happened in term of protection, I would think the idea of meeting the family is not a priority for him anymore. Royal residence is far from been their only choice and if they bring the children they will stay where they will be most secured.
If relation with his father is bad, I don’t see why Harry or Meghan would want them to meet the king. But if they do, it might be very limited.
Harry, hopefully with Meghan, is coming in July for work. They will be in an enclosed space with accommodation and meal on site. They don’t need a royal house. If they bring children, they can be at the IG site out of public eyes.
As for learning of their father’s country, the can visit historic sites, starting with Althorp.
It’s a slow month royal wise in the UK. The fanatic focus on the Sussex is no more than clickbait.
Yeah harry was clear when he said that he wanted his kids to know the uk. All this “shock” is performative or naive. He said he couldn’t imagine bringing them unless they were safe. So if they come, he has presumably found a situation in which they can be safe. Harry has many friends in the uk, despite the BM saying that he does not.
I wouldn’t be surprised if H&M are in “wait and see” mode regarding the kids, though I think they’re playing the long game here. Since the news has been announced, the British Media have shown their hand and so has Willy. So Charles can’t blame Sussex stubbornness if they refuse to bring the kids. Harry has exposed who incites his security issues and makes them worse. He hasn’t even had to say a word.
Do they mean accommodation in the literal sense as in lodging, or accommodation as in he’ll deign to let them visit without him being a total jerk about it because Harry is basically promoting Britain with these events in Birmingham? After the Frogmore mess, I wouldn’t trust these people to lend them a pup tent without weaponizing it against the Sussexes and screaming about taxpayers paying for it or feeling entitled to access to the family. They were just briefing against Harry and Meghan about removing all trace of them from Frogmore so I hope the Sussexes say absolutely nothing about this upcoming visit, assuming it happens, and sort out their own accommodations and keep that private.
It’s so weird and creepy how desperate the rota are to see Lili’s and Archie’s faces. I hope those two kiddos spend most of the time with Diana’s family, who will guard their privacy ferociously.
Yes, stay with your mother’s brother Charles (your uncle). He will make sure you are totally safe imo. I cannot trust any of the rancid leftovers, even your father and especially your brother. They are terrible people. I can’t say anymore, but please protect yourself and your family from the derangers in your own family.
Mm, yes, dude needs to make up for not allowing Diana to live there.