Why isn’t anyone asking about who paused Prince Harry’s UK risk assessment?

Today would have been Princess Diana’s 65th birthday. Today is also the tenth anniversary of Prince Harry and then-Meghan Markle’s first conversation. They would later have their first two dates at Soho House as Meghan was in London to watch Wimbledon. Currently, Harry and Meghan are enjoying a family vacation somewhere in Europe, possibly at their multi-million-dollar Portuguese villa. Some have suggested that they could also be staying at Elton John’s French Riviera villa. I think Portugal is more likely, but they have tons of wealthy friends with European vacation homes, so who knows.

The original plan for the Sussexes was almost definitely to base themselves somewhere outside of the UK, then spend a careful week in the UK with the children. The original agenda involved spending time at Althorp with the Spencer family, several days in Birmingham for the Invictus One Year to Go events, and then some charity events in London. At some point, the family was supposed to spend time with King Charles and it’s now clear that Charles offered the Sussexes some royal residence (and Charles made sure to brief that to every outlet). What’s not clear is what verbal or written guarantees of security Harry might have been given for months beforehand. He behaved like he believed that some security would be granted, especially for the Invictus events. RAVEC waited to inform him last Friday that he would receive zero police protection for the entire trip. GB News had an honest breakdown of exactly what this is:

Whether Prince Harry and his family should, or should not, get taxpayer-funded police protection when they are in the United Kingdom is a deeply polarising question. The Duke of Sussex’s first priority is keeping himself and his family safe, and he is still furious a Home Office committee downgraded his security level when he stood back as a working member of the Royal Family in 2020. Many have asked me what security The Prince actually gets in the United Kingdom. The answer? A phone number for a police liaison officer, with many more digits than the country’s quick 999 emergency call system.

Apart from his own private bodyguards, who are legally banned from carrying firearms and do not have access to police or secret intelligence, the King’s second son and his family have limited protection. No specialist vehicle escort, personal protection officers, reinforced barriers, or snipers on rooftops. Sometimes, local police forces have taken pity on the Prince and provided a small amount of support out of their own budgets.

Yet, around-the-clock armed police protection costs the British taxpayer millions of pounds each year, which six years ago was deemed disproportionate for a former working royal. The Duke of Sussex lost a High Court appeal to overturn this decision. He had also offered to pay for his own police protection, but a judge declared police were ‘not for sale’ – ruling wealthy individuals should not have the right to hire officers for their own personal protection.

Last November, the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC) decided an independent Risk Management Board (RMB) should take place to conduct an objective assessment of Prince Harry’s current threat level and vulnerability.

The RMB would then make recommendations to RAVEC about the appropriate and bespoke package of protective security needed to protect Prince Harry and his family.

Despite The Duke’s office being told the RMB was happening in March, it is understood they only found out on Friday that all assessments had been “paused” without explanation, and RAVEC had therefore not updated their stance on Prince Harry’s security situation.

The Home Office declined to comment on specifics, but told the People’s Channel: “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”

[From GB News]

People like Tom Sykes and Tina Brown have been screaming that Harry “knew” he didn’t have police protection when he planned the visit, but this timeline indicates that Harry was told in MARCH that the risk assessment would finally be done. Harry probably naively believed that he could take them at their word and that by July, the risk assessment would find that his family needs security and everything would work out. Harry was blind-sided not only by RAVEC telling him that there would be zero security, but that the risk-assessment had been paused months beforehand and he had never been notified about it. As Robert Jobson said this week, this is the noise of a divided crown – did King Charles know that the risk assessment had been paused? Did Prince William know? They both have courtiers on RAVEC, so they both should have known months ago. At best, Charles and/or William were sowing chaos. At worst, this is really feeling like a complete trap for the Sussexes.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

37 Responses to “Why isn’t anyone asking about who paused Prince Harry’s UK risk assessment?”

  1. JT says:

    Nobody’s asking about the pause in the risk assessment because it’s pretty damn obvious that the palace (BP, KP, or both) paused it. All of this “confusion” is just ass covering and lies.

    • Jais says:

      Exactly. They paused it. I’m not sure about how a divided crown has anything to do with this. I could be wrong but ummm pretty sure Charles and William both have known that the risk assessment was paused. And if Charles was keen to see his grandkids then he would have got it done or told Harry in advance that it was not happening. Unless we are to believe that Charles’s one rep on RAVEC also did not let him know. Really??? I still can’t believe the IG are happening and there is no security for the patron when every other country has been able to provide this. And I’m sorry, I’m not sure I buy that Charles didn’t know about it and it’s all William. I could be wrong on that but creating this conflict of who paused it, one of them or both of them, is real damn convenient just saying.

      • Eurydice says:

        Seems to me the only thing Charles and William agree on is they don’t want Harry and his family in the country. They just show it according to their personalities – Charles is passive-aggressive stab-in-the-back, and William is in-your-face rage monster.

  2. Dee(2) says:

    I think one or both definitely knew that it was paused, and they were holding out for different things to be confirmed from the Sussexes, before allowing RAVEC to inform Harry. I think William wanted to know if it was going to just be Harry coming, and if he was going to be isolated only to Invictus events. I think Charles wanted to know if the kids were going to come with Meghan, and if he could get photos, even back of the head ones with the kids for him to display.

    And I think once it was confirmed that the entire family was coming, that they would be doing Invictus and other charitable events, and know their kids would not be in public or seen that both got angry and decided to let RAVEC then inform Harry.

    But, the bigger question is as correctly asked, why was the review paused? We know that they agreed to review it again this past winter, and I wonder if all of the internal issues going on with the Labour party this spring, may have impacted whomever is on the board that was pushing for the reassessment.

    Because that becomes the salient issue. You won’t provide him with security because your risk assessment says that he doesn’t need it, but you don’t have a current risk assessment, but you won’t do a current risk assessment to see if it matches the old one that said that he doesn’t need security. It’s just a dog chasing his tail at this point.

    • Beth says:

      Actually, the last proper RMB assessment was done in 2019 and this found Harry’s threat level was higher than anyone’s except QEII’s. The former UK Head of Counterterrorism, who sat on RAVEC, says it’s likely even higher now and Harry requires permanent automatic protective security. I suspect this is why they keep kicking the RMB into the long grass. It’s ridiculous, because RAVEC protective security could even be more cost-effective than local police forces across the country having to fork out from their stretched resources. And it’s only for the few times a year the Sussexes would be in the UK.

      • DK says:

        Ahhh, @Beth…so this is the rub. Unlike emotional-support polls, a legitimate, objective assessment conducted in the same manner RAVEC conducts any others would show that Harry (and Meghan) is/are indeed still very much the focus of British fascination and focus. Wow.

        I’m also curious: non-working former royal Andrew still gets police protection, paid for allegedly by Charles, right?

        So why can’t/won’t Charles foot the bill for Harry police protection for the entire duration of Harry’s visit in the UK? Obviously the king can afford it (all his can’t-afford-to-feed-another-mouth BS aside).

        And it looks really bad that he hasn’t offered?!

        (I mean, I wouldn’t be surprised if his plan all along was to shut down the review and then offer to provide protection himself so it looks like an olive branch, but if so…1) way to recklessly endanger your child/grandchildren to boost your own profile; and 2) coming up a day late and a dollar short now…)

  3. Eurydice says:

    Interesting to see a story with actual facts.

    The Crown is divided even without Harry – he’s just the proxy war.

    • Jais says:

      Interesting to see it from GB News as well. And when it’s just the facts presented, it doesn’t look good for the RF, ravec or the govt.

    • Monika says:

      Especially coming from GB news, normally a right wing news outlet, pro monarchy and ant Sussex.

  4. 2131Jan says:

    While we all know for a fact that Harry (and M, of course) will do everything in their power to protect their family, I can’t help but think at this point, if I was in this situation, I would finally throw my hands up and say, “ENOUGH!” It’s a bitter disappointment to the child within us all to finally have to face that a parent doesn’t really give a shit about you, that slim, glimmer of hope that inner child holds onto… has to finally be faced and extinguished. Otherwise, this merry-go-round of disappointment will never end.

    Harry has extended his hand over and over, given Dog Shit Dad multiple offers, to meet the kids in person, only to have that hand rebuffed with false starts, statements, and hollow words.

    I am in awe of H’s personal strength; I would’ve written off Dog Shit Dad a long time ago.

    • Jais says:

      Here’s the thing. I think there’s a very real possibility that Meghan and the kids don’t go or maybe they go for one day or night. And Harry will go on record about it. The BM will twist it to make him seem whiny and like it’s all about the money, but again anyone outside loyalist circles won’t buy it. They just won’t. So that defense will only fly with an ever shrinking royalist part of the uk population. And I maintain that it will come back to bite the left behinds bc the BM will be angry about the missed opportunity. And they will find ways to take swipes at the left behinds. How hard they’ll swipe, idk bc they stilll protect the monarchy ultimately, but it will happen; they will swipe in some way. Bc right now, we’ve got GB News presenting just the facts, and let’s be real bc that almost never happens .

    • bisynaptic says:

      What would “Enough!” look like? Harry still needs to appear in public in the UK, for his various charities.

  5. YankeeDoodles says:

    I think Harry knows exactly who his father is. This campaign is about making it impossible to deny who Charles really is, for all the people straining to attribute reasonable doubt to this malignant narcissist. Harry was very clear in Spare that he does not buy the narrative about his mother’s death & then he said in his interview about RAVEC that he had discovered something devastating. He’s ripping off the harmless old befuddled mask that Charles wears. There’s a seething vindictive person under it who merely pretends to be helpless when it suits him. Remember what the late Queen warned Harry, “Your father does exactly what he wants.” If Charles wanted Harry to have security, he would have it. He’s merely assembled the family council to hide behind others — & he has form for using family members as human shields. Diana saw straight through the man she sarcastically dubbed, “Wonder Boy.”

    • irisrose says:

      IMO he’s playing the long game to reveal how both Charles and William are doing this. If enough of an outcry happens, control of RAVEC is removed from royals. When/if Billy the Basher becomes king, he would then have no authority to stop Sussex Family from traveling to the UK whenever they want, without warning, and receiving full security

  6. Tn Democrat says:

    The security assessment cannot take place because it would clearly show the Sussexes are at risk and need security. The Sussexes should get automatic security as people with high profiles according to existing laws. Their profile is what matters, not that working royal nonsense. Their risk is made much worse by the never-ending Windsor smear campaign. A true assessment would demand that the smear campaign stop because it is counterproductive for the government to be on the hook for providing security to high profile people and to make the same people’s risk greater by playing stupid games in the media. Abolish the monarchy.

  7. Lisa says:

    Leave the children and Meghan home they definitely aren’t safe! And stop giving Charles a heads up on their engagements from here on out! He doesn’t deserve the 30 day Info on Harry’s movements from now on! Stick with the Spencer family they have proven themselves to be caring family members! I really hat the left behind losers!

    • Jais says:

      No, Harry is following the protocol and being transparent. It is revealing who is creating the problems. Sneaking his family in without security? He is not going to do that right now. He is going to push for every fair way for him and his kids to visit without being sneaky or cloak and dagger about it. And if that makes the RF and the uk govt bad, that’s on them.

  8. Lucky Charm says:

    Maybe there are some European royals that are coming over during that same timeframe who can offer them accommodation and accompany them on all their visits. That way they’ll still have all the necessary security they need. It’s a loophole but could work.

  9. Monika says:

    RAVEC still does not say why all assessments have been paused which indicates that other people are also affected by this decision.

    I said this before RAVEC created this mess by not communicating the change of the decision to Harry and his team on time. IHarry could have adjusted his plans if he had known this.

    • irisrose says:

      It could indicate that, but it is an assumption. RAVEC could have made quick decisions about all other cases first, then paused Sussex Family’s case.

  10. Hypocrisy says:

    I’m convinced this is a huge set up by both Chuck and William, one of them personally gave orders to stop the risk assessment and leave them with no security at the last minute before their scheduled visit.. and I also believe they have very sinister intentions for Meghan and the children if they come to that island.. this is such an evil thing to do to anyone but considering that they killed princess Diana by pulling her security it seems like they are just following the same playbook looking for the same result and it’s terrifying to watch this mess unfold.

  11. Wesley says:

    Charles is King, & dying with cancer. He is, literally, a dead man walking. William is now in charge. Officials will give precedence to his views over those of the King. Charles will know this & also know there’s nothing that can be done about ot.

  12. bisynaptic says:

    The GB report is shockingly accurate!
    Who, indeed. Someone should make a FOI request.

  13. LeonsMomma says:

    With the RAVEC pause and the Daily Fail (and its brethren), is the end game having one or more killed? Does the possibility of “punishing” (initiated by Charles, William, courtiers) Harry really have to include putting Harry’s family at risk? Does the Royal Family think that because it weathered the death of Diana, it will do so again? The world has changed and Charles/William/Camilla are no Elizabeth. (And she even had to be pushed by Tony Blair to mourn for Diana.) For the papers, you will get big clicks — but there will be blood on your hands. (They all will have blood on their hands.)

    • ArtHistorian says:

      “Does the Royal Family think that because it weathered the death of Diana, it will do so again?”
      – I actually think that is the belief. They literally briefed that they didn’t think that a successful attempt on Harry would cause a public outcry. Plus, these people do not learn at all. If they had learned from the whole Diana debacle, they wouldn’t have treated Meghan so badly and neither would they have used the same playbook that they used for Diana: public smear-campaign, painting her as mentally unstable and yanking the security.

    • Chrissy says:

      IMO, there would again be riots in the streets and it would end the monarchy.

  14. Lady Digby says:

    Horrible to contemplate but if there was an attack on Harry in UK , how would RAVEC pausing his security assessment look then? It is appalling that Harry ‘s security was pulled without due diligence of said security assessment being carried out. How is this justifiable if anything bad happens to him? Diana ‘s death nearly capsized Charles. Does he want a similar disaster to befall his own son in the UK and have to face criticism of his conduct? Doesn’t he care about the safety and protection of his own son, daughter in law and two grandchildren?He paid for security for Camilla before their engagement and also Andrew’s security?Common sense is that the Sussexes should have a risk assessment and based on that alone get security as appropriate. This is all very concerning to watch unfold. Kirsty MacColl gave up her own life to save her son when a power boat was coming towards them. Now that is a parent.

  15. B says:

    All of this was intentionally done. Since the Sussexes left the firm and senior royals have constantly attempted to sabotage and smear them. Their reach is limited in the USA and this security issue in the UK is all the only lever they have left to cause harm. This is them using it.

  16. Becks1 says:

    The risk assessment was paused for Harry because we all know what it would say – that he should have security automatically when he’s in the UK. But was it paused for everyone?? That seems like a big flaw in the process since VIPs dont just stop traveling because of a family dispute.

    It’s clear that the rug was pulled out from Harry and its also clear that the royals are behind it – whether its William acting through Simon Case or whoever, or Clive Alderton acting on behalf of Charles (or William), or Charles or William themselves directly calling the shots – this is on the royals.

    • Stella says:

      Yes, I agree completely. There’s no way he’d have planned to go to the UK, with the children especially, without the promise of protection. Then they pulled it. I truly didn’t believe the stories last week because Harry is so security conscious, he’d never dream putting any of them in danger. Nor would he wait till a week out hoping there would be security. Someone did a U turn.

    • Not a Subject says:

      Simon Case is long gone. He went back to the Tory govt and then the Liberals won primeminister. He’s probably working at Sleaze & Skeeze LLP right now :-/ I have no idea who took over his role

      • Becks1 says:

        oh i know he’s gone from KP but there was some speculation yesterday that he’s one of William’s reps on RAVEC.

  17. irisrose says:

    I thought their first date was on July 1. Didn’t Meghan then post the massive bouquet of peonies Harry sent her?

  18. KC2 says:

    I think it’s the Diana effect for both Charles and William. Harry, Meghan and the kids are going to be the biggest event that has hit England since the boring Coronation. No way are C&W want to be sidelined.
    Charles is the King of freaking England. If he wanted Harry there, Harry would be there.

    And as for William and Kate, even they aren’t stupid enough to think they can hide when Harry is here. This way they can slide the fault.
    Weak and petty losers.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment