Netflix paid $587 million for Ben Affleck’s AI startup InterPositive

Ben Affleck aat hte Breakthrough Price Ceremeony 4-18-26
Back in March, shortly after Netflix’s deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery for $82.7 billion crashed and burned, we learned that instead the streamer had picked up a different company: InterPositive, an AI startup founded by Ben Affleck. When they announced the acquisition, Netflix and Affleck touted InterPositive as a filmmaking tool that uses AI to process dailies (the unedited footage shot on set each day) and perform postproduction work like lighting and effects. They really hyped the angle of “this is just for the tedious parts of filmmaking” and left unsaid the bit about all the human jobs wiped out by this technology. Also left unsaid at the time was how much Netflix spent on this purchase. Well, Netflix just had to submit a federal filing and it revealed that they cut Ben Affleck a check for $587 million to buy InterPositive. That’s a lot of Dunkin’ Donuts!

As part of the company’s Form 10-Q report with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Netflix confirmed that it completed an acquisition in March “for a total purchase price of approximately $587 million.” The disclosure came months after a Bloomberg report indicated Netflix’s March acquisition could amount to up to $600 million for Affleck and InterPositive’s investors, even if the total price for the company was less than that amount.

The remainder would be made up through “certain performance targets,” according to the Bloomberg report. Netflix did not respond to an immediate request for comment.

Netflix purchased Affleck’s startup, which he founded in 2022 and operated in stealth mode, in a bid to develop AI tools that kept “filmmakers at the center of the process.” The purchase brought aboard InterPositive’s 16-person team of engineers, researchers and creatives, while Affleck joined Netflix as a senior adviser. The company’s tools allow filmmakers to build an AI model using production dailies to help enhance post-production work such as mixing, relighting shots and adding visual effects, forgoing typical visual generative efforts.

“From the invention of the moving image to the transition to digital, from motion capture to virtual production, technology has evolved alongside the artists who use it,” Affleck said as part of the merger announcement. “Our shared commitment to continuing this legacy makes joining together a natural next step, in addition to Neftlix’s decades of experience applying and scaling technology responsibly.”

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos highlighted the company’s integration of generative AI tools and its work with InterPositive during its second-quarter earnings call on Thursday, where it revealed that roughly 300 of its titles have used some form of generative AI this year. Sarandos said that while the InterPositive deal was still in its “early days,” Netflix has seen its impact on productions alongside some of its other in-house tools.

Still, even as he highlighted the use of AI in the docuseries “The American Experiment” to produce sequences “twice as fast and at half the cost of previous options,” he said the company wasn’t eager to replace human-made work with generative technology.

“We believe it takes great artists to make something great, and AI is not changing that,” Sarandos said. “Movies are being made by people who make movies. AI provides them with better tools to make them even better.”

We believe it takes great artists to make something great, and AI is not changing that.” If that line wasn’t written by AI, then this follow up definitely was: “Movies are being made by people who make movies. AI provides them with better tools to make them even better.” Not if it spits out sentences like that! No really, what kind of demented Dick and Jane reading primer language is “Movies are being made by people who make movies,” huh?!! In fact all the quotes here are bloated statements meant to placate us. The only honest comment is when Ted Sarandos brags on his earnings call about AI working twice as fast at half the cost. Well, I’ll return the candor and admit that I pointedly refused to watch The American Experiment. I hope Chris Nolan is right about the youngins rejecting AI and that they’ll decline to watch AI-enhanced Netflix content as well.

Screenshot of Ben Affleck saying 'I understand the skepticism because I share it'

Ben Affleck, Luciana Damon and Matt Damon at the Crime 101 premiere 2-11-26

Matt Damon, Ben Affleck and Ted Sarandos at the premiere of The Rip

Photos credit: Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency / BACKGRID/Avalon and via YouTube/Netflix

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

9 Responses to “Netflix paid $587 million for Ben Affleck’s AI startup InterPositive”

  1. Neeve says:

    Thats a whole lot of money but wouldnt it have been worth more if he held on to it a bit longer?

  2. Tiff says:

    This is all tied to nepotism. They are using AI because the next generation isnt making great movies. Their kids and neighbors still get to make a movie even if they dont have “the gift”. Its sad. Entertainment was a way for regular people to move up. Now you will need ai software and an expensive home/work computer.

  3. Anon says:

    Ben will be left with the money, the world with the consequences…

  4. bisynaptic says:

    Count me out.

    We’re going to need to pass legislation to label all this AI stuff.

  5. Margot84 says:

    People seem to be turning on AI…A1🤣Netflix and their terrible decisions.

  6. Sasha says:

    Ben’s personal life may often be in shambles but the man has no problem making huuuuuge amounts of money it seems!

  7. Chaine says:

    More like Ben Ick-fleck. JLo is so much better off without this face-lifted, beard-dyed shell of a traitor to the craft of filmmaking.

  8. jferber says:

    Yes, give millions of dollars to ALL the mediocre, problematic white men of this country.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment