‘Cookie Queens’ had a modest opening weekend for a limited theatrical release

Embed from Getty Images

When Roadside Attractions purchased Cookie Queens a few months after the documentary premiered at Sundance, they did so with the promise that Cookie Queens would get a theatrical release. That’s a big deal – many documentaries get shuffled off to streaming these days. So, Cookie Queens got a limited theatrical release starting last week, with 446 screens carrying the documentary. That in and of itself is a big achievement! But not to Page Six and the British media, all of whom are now mocking the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for not making a box office hit. You guys, it’s a documentary about Girl Scouts selling cookies.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s newest film project, “Cookie Queens,” crumbled at the box office over the weekend as the latest Hollywood misstep for the runaway royals.

The documentary — which marked the Montecito duo’s theatrical feature debut as executive producers — was left with crumbs, grabbing just $735 per screen and opening at No. 15, according to Boxoffice Pro. That was five spots behind “CatVideoFest 2026,” a 70-minute theatrical compilation of the internet’s best cat videos.

Other indie films that opened ahead of “Cookie Queens” included “Tony” — the Anthony Bourdain biopic from A24 that debuted on just six screens — and two Indian imports, “DC” and “Korean Kanakaraju.” (Another popular tracking site, IMDb’s Box Office Mojo, had “Cookie Queens” at No. 13, but didn’t have numbers reported for the two Indian films.)

Markle and Harry’s Archewell Productions hasn’t found traction with audiences since a tell-all docuseries about their exit from the royal family first launched a lucrative deal with Netflix.

“Cookie Queens” arrived in theaters with a feel-good premise and critical raves. The Alysa Nahmias-helmed documentary entered the weekend with an impressive 94% rating on RottenTomatoes.

But the box-office numbers were half-baked at best, with the film about one intense Girl Scout Cookie season earning just $327,797 from 446 screens.

(Compare that to the 2003 doc “Spellbound,” which was tonally similar and revolved around eight kids vying for the National Spelling Bee title. That film had a per-screen average of $17,508 in its opening weekend en route to a $7,457,710 haul during its full run over two decades ago.)

Jeff Bock, senior media analyst at Exhibitor Relations, tells P6H that indie distributor Roadside Attractions made a head-scratching decision to release “Cookie Queens” during the summer corridor.

“The documentary probably should have been released at the height of Girl Scout cookie season, when the cookies, and the girls selling them, are part of the national conversation,” Bock says. “For a small documentary, timing is marketing. It missed the very window that could have made it feel relevant and turned curiosity into ticket sales. Guess that’s the way the cookie crumbles.”

[From Page Six]

I think releasing it in the dead of summer was a weird call as well, unless Roadside’s intention was “counterprogramming for all of the big summer movies.” Like, you can go see Spider-Man, The Odyssey or… you can take your daughters to see Cookie Queens. I think those numbers are perfectly respectable, by the way, for a small documentary. And getting 90-something percent on Rotten Tomatoes is a big deal as well. The reviews are great, and I’m glad someone made a good documentary about Girl Scouts. I’m sure it will find an audience.

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

Photos courtesy of Getty Images, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “‘Cookie Queens’ had a modest opening weekend for a limited theatrical release”

  1. Meri says:

    I’m going to watch it, because I used to be a scout myself, but this was never going to be a Marvel movie level of profit. I’m glad that it seems to be getting good reviews, I imagine being about young girls is holding back the usual crowd from tearing it apart.

  2. Ciotog says:

    Comparing it to a documentary from 2003–before streaming services existed—is wild. Lots of people will find this when it streams.

    I’m guessing they wanted it in theatres to make it eligible for awards? But I don’t know that for sure.

    • Snuffles says:

      Yes, I know that for the Oscars, movies need a theatrical release to qualify.

    • ABritGuest says:

      Also I wonder- because the ex Variety turned page six scribe omitted this fact – how many screens 2003 spellbound opened with to see whether it’s opening is really comparable to the limited 400 + screens that Cookie Queens had.

      I also find the comments from the exhibitor about the release timing weird because it’s been very common strategy for years to release alternative fare to big summer blockbusters in August.

      https://variety.com/2013/film/news/austenland-stephenie-meyer-aubrey-plaza-1200433810/

      Anyway cookie queens is getting fab reviews and I saw reviewers saying it will have legs so let’s see if they expand screens etc

  3. Over it says:

    Maybe if these bitter Betty had a cookie or two they won’t be so dam unhappy all the time

  4. Dee(2) says:

    I don’t even feel the need to defend this. Or drop facts about documentary performance. This is where you are british media, f*** y**, girl scouts for being associated with Harry and Meghan.
    Keep going.

    And keep wondering why the smear campaign isn’t working and you’re getting less and less clicks and attention. What will it take for them to understand that being willing to malign anything or anyone to take a pop at Harry and Meghan doesn’t endear them?

  5. Nic919 says:

    They had to go back over 20 years to find a documentary making money as if the entire film industry hasn’t shrunk since Covid.

    I checked to see if it was playing in Toronto, which usually gets films, although not quite as many as NY and LA. The first showing isn’t until August 29.

    In any case, this is likely to do well on streaming. And with a theatrical release, this will qualify for the Oscar’s.

  6. Graphinya Heather says:

    OMG this niche documentary didn’t pull in Spiderman BND numbers!! Failure!!!

    This will do well on streaming, I do think it should have been released during cookie season but I’m sure distribution wasn’t up to Meghan, unlike what the RRs think. For someone so “irrelevant” she has so much power….

    • Julia says:

      It is possible they wanted it eligible for the upcoming Awards season. Hence the Summer release. It’s a win to get a niche documentary in movie theatres and to have such excellent reviews! There is no actual story here!

  7. Smices says:

    I noticed that it’s expanding where I’m at. I went to check showtimes and there were only a handful of showings in the early part of the week but tons more later this week. So clearly the exhibitors are happy with how it’s performing.

  8. Jais says:

    You know what? It looks like a cute documentary and the girls got to see themselves on the big screen. That’s a win in my book.

  9. NorthernLights says:

    Meghan always has the last laugh. Always. They never learn and always celebrate prematurely.

  10. Julia says:

    As other commentators have said, to compare it to a documentary from 2003, before streaming is ridiculous. It’s a niche independent film about Girl Scouts! There are no issues here, the numbers are as expected for this type of movie on limited release! A Deadline article talking about the Box Office framed the numbers in a positive light! The constant attacks on everything Harry and Meghan do is exhausting though. Especially when there is nothing to criticise!

    • Louise123 says:

      It’s annoying that the expectations for Harry and Meghan are much higher than the norm. It says something to have to go back 20 years to find a documentary that made real money.

    • Eurydice says:

      Plus, Spellbound was in the theaters for a year before it went to cable.

  11. Mads says:

    Of the 5 Oscar nominees for best documentary last year, the highest overall cumulative domestic gross was $420,000 with the others ranging from $33,280 to $320,530 and only one of them actually had an international release schedule.

    Cookie Queens is a niche market, limited release documentary that had a very respectable $350,000+ opening weekend.

  12. Eurydice says:

    It’s showing at the theater 5 minutes from my home and in several other theaters around Boston. It got a very good review from the Boston Globe (and they hate everything). I’ll try to go this week.

  13. tamsin says:

    Hoped the writer had fun with all those groan worthy comments about the documentary “crumbling” and “that’s the way the cookie crumbles” and the ratings merely “crumbs.” Hahaha! Anyway, according to industry standards, Cookie Queens did well. Apparently, the Anthony Bourdain bio came marginally ahead at the box office. I would like to see the Bourdain feature as well. It’s so sad that his voice is no longer on this planet.

  14. VMax says:

    I live in a community with a huge Girl Scout presence during cookie season. However, I’ve not seen any ads for Cookie Queens, even though it’s playing in my area. This doc could’ve done much better if GSA had partnered with promoting its release.

    • Julia says:

      Girl Scout troops in. California and New York bought out whole screanings so they could watch it. The documentary did well in theatres that traditionally show documentaries. How many adverts for niche independent documentaries do you normally see in your local area?

  15. Amy Bee says:

    Maybe I’m being naive but I think a documentary making over $300,000 is a good result.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment