Over the weekend, the Mail’s You Magazine published a bizarre cover story about the Duchess of Sussex’s “decade of drama.” As we all know, before July 2016, then-Meghan Markle had a stellar reputation as a lifestyle blogger and working actress on a successful cable show. She kept her nose clean, she did yoga, she traveled, she did charity work and she surrounded herself with loyal friends. Then during Wimbledon that year, she met a ginger prince and by the last few months of 2016, her life completely changed. She was being stalked by paparazzi, and they were getting in her mom’s face as well. The British media began their campaign of racism, harassment and defamation, lying about her background, her motivations, her career, her friends, her coworkers and her family. They used racist dog-whistles constantly, if not outright racist language. All of that continues to this very day. The “decade of drama” is the media’s drama, not Meghan’s. Anyway, there are a couple of BS stories from this Sarah Vine-authored mess, so let’s discuss.
Prince Harry & Meghan’s lack of emotional intelligence: The Daily Mail’s Sarah Vine said that throughout their time as a couple, the Sussexes have appeared to have a “weapons-grade sense of entitlement” but have failed to demonstrate awareness of the impact of their actions. Ms Vine said: “For two people who claim to be so in tune with their feelings and those of others, time and again they have demonstrated a complete lack of emotional intelligence, combined with a weapons-grade sense of entitlement. They are so wrapped up in their own drama, so insulated in their bubble of privilege, they fail to realise how thoroughly charmed their existence is. And that is a most unattractive trait.”
Harry weaponized his pain: “At a time when the Royal Family needed Harry most, he not only slammed the door in their face, but he also tried to burn the place down on the way out. No one is suggesting he doesn’t have a right to be hurt – but weaponising your pain as he has done only perpetuates the cycle of sadness.”
In 2015, Meghan attended the opening of a Soho House branch in Istanbul: [At] the opening of Soho House in Istanbul, Turkey, Vine said a friend who attended the event recalled waiting in the hotel lobby when a “very pretty American woman strode up to the front desk” and began complaining to staff. “She proceeded to berate the staff about some kind of problem in her room,” Vine wrote. “My friend couldn’t quite catch the details, but the general gist seemed to be that she was unhappy with the quality of her goodie bag, which she felt was insufficiently lavish in its largess. My friend remembers thinking, ‘Wow, it takes quite some chutzpah to complain about a free gift at a free weekend in a five-star hotel full of A-listers’.” Vine said her friend had “no idea who the angry American was” at the time. It was not until a year later, when photographs emerged of Prince Harry’s new girlfriend, that he allegedly “recognised her immediately” as Meghan.
Another bullying accusation, you guys: According to the columnist, a friend with contacts inside the royal household told her Meghan was interviewing prospective staff when a “young girl- a perfectly harmless and nervous Sloane in her early 20s” was “ushered into her presence”. What allegedly followed was an excruciating encounter: “Meghan was sitting at her desk, reading some papers,” Vine said. “For what seemed like an eternity, she kept her eyes down, ignoring the girl completely. She then glanced up, examined her, then went back to work. ‘You can leave,’ she said. And that was that.” Vine ended her column with a pointed observation: “One for Harry to ponder, perhaps, as he considers his future within the Royal Family.”
[From You Magazine via the Express and News24]
I’m sure both of the “never-before-told” stories are absolute crap, but the story about Meghan dismissing a nervous Sloane is so offensively stupid, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. The idea that the galloping racists within Kensington Palace would somehow set Meghan up to personally interview people is absurd – there were only a handful of staffers dedicated to working with Harry and Meghan to begin with, and most of them were basically Jason Knauf’s double-agents. The Istanbul story also sounds like yet another Deranger fan-fic, something retconned years later when fixated individuals were looking through Meghan’s Instagram and Tig archives.
The stuff about Harry “weaponizing his pain” is keeping with the British media’s twisted pop psychology. They remain furious that Harry managed to stop the Windsors’ cycles of generational trauma in one generation, his kids’ generation. Archie and Lili get to grow up free from the Windsor psychodrama, and it comes at great personal cost to Harry and Meghan.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Meghan’s Instagram.
- (170118) — DAVOS, Jan. 18, 2017 () — U.S. Vice President Joe Biden speaks at the 47th Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 18, 2017.(/Xu Jinquan)(gl)
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle depart from St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle after their wedding.,Image: 515245001, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- The Duke and Duchess of Sussex at the Queen’s Young Leaders Awards Ceremony at Buckingham Palace, London. The Queen’s Young Leaders Programme, now in its fourth and final year, celebrates the achievements of young people from across the Commonwealth working to improve the lives of people across a diverse range of issues including supporting people living with mental health problems, access to education, promoting gender equality, food scarcity and climate change .,Image: 515509152, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: NO UK USE FOR SEVEN DAYS – Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251 Madrid: +34 91 533 4289, Model Release: no, Credit line: – / Avalon
- Meghan Markle at the CFDA-Vogue fashion awards held at Spring Studio in New York City on November 2, 2015.,Image: 516887229, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: WORLD RIGHTS- Fee Payable Upon Reproduction – For queries contact Avalon.red – sales@avalon.red London: +44 (0) 20 7421 6000 Los Angeles: +1 (310) 822 0419 Berlin: +49 (0) 30 76 212 251, Model Release: no, Credit line: Dennis Van Tine/Avalon/Avalon
- MANDATORY CREDIT: Chris Allerton – copyright SussexRoyal NEWS EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO COMMERCIAL USE. NO MERCHANDISING, ADVERTISING, SOUVENIRS, MEMORABILIA or COLOURABLY SIMILAR. NOT FOR USE AFTER FRIDAY JUNE 7, 2019, WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM ROYAL COMMUNICATIONS AT BUCKINGHAM PALACE. This photograph is provided to you strictly on condition that these conditions and restrictions will apply (and that you will pass these on) to any organisation to whom you supply it. There shall be no commercial use whatsoever of the photographs (including by way of example only) any use in merchandising, advertising or any other non-news editorial use. The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form and must include all of the individuals in the photograph when published. All other requests for use should be directed to the Buckingham Palace Press Office in writing. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are joined by her mother, Doria Ragland, as they show their new son, born Monday and named as Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, to the Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh at Windsor Castle.






















Derangers must go back on time to try to get something on meghan
Some articles need to be shown to show the depth of those gutter rats rage and jealousy over two people who do not even know them. Seems like this pitiful woman is getting ready to publish a book because she is desperate for cash. The whole article sounds like nonsense for some sort of validation.
I have heard of a couple with a “weapons-grade sense of entitlement”.
They’re called Scooter the Incandescent Bully and Mumblina “Wiglet” McButtons.
They felt entitled to getting yet another forever home, needed their own helicopter, need to be propped up by emotional support polls…
But, hey, Meghan and Harry. Too funny that there’s always a friend of a friend of a rota 🐀 somewhere to be found to witness imagined transgressions that never happened in real life. Too bad the rota 🐀’s sources remain anonymous, while friends of Meghan and Harry speak out in public.
Someone help me out. What is a Sloane?
Lived in Sloane Square, very expensive housing in London.
Short for Sloane Ranger, a young woman of means. Very preppy, from a “good” family. Diana was a Sloane Ranger.
Also known as Sloan Rangers, I don’t know if it’s still a thing but very specific way of dressing and generally being posh.
Sarah Vine writing fanfic sounds about right. It like an AO3 story excerpted for the DM.
Wasn’t keen dismissive of a child who asked her a question and keen said next rather coldly
She did. IIRC she was asked about Meghan?
It’s not like the self-styled royal experts never tell on themselves while perpetuating these kinds of stories…
Stopping generational trauma is one of the hardest things an individual can do. The person(s) trying to stop it AND HEAL becomes the villain. How dare they speak out and make changes. More importantly, how dare they say something is wrong with how things are being done????? Being the healer is not for the faint of heart. It takes courage and resiliency. So in this case, not only are Willy and Katie stuck in this negative environment showing everyone that they do not have the courage or resiliency to make the changes BUT they are holding back those that want to change. That must be a huge blow to both egos. And make no mistake, both have one.
Such a good point about the kids – put that way, M&H’s choice shares commonality with immigrants around the world choose to leave home – to give their children freedom and opportunities they themselves didn’t have.
I asked Ai if British royals interview their staff. This was the answer.
“No, senior members of the British royal family rarely interview their own household staff directly. The recruitment process is handled by senior royal household management, human resources, and specialized recruitment heads—such as Tracey Waterman, the head of staff recruitment for the royal family.”
I can’t image a circumstance where any royal would interview their own staff, I don’t they all have people for that. Anyway, I think this Sarah Vine woman is looking for attention from the Sussexes. She wants a response of denial by the Sussexes PR people. The fact that these people can just wake up in the morning an write lies (with impunity), is truly bunkers.
She’s trying to make it sound like a Miranda Priestly imitation .
I just can’t anymore. The amount of methane gas these people put out is practically an ecological crime.
It feels like someone watched “The Devil Wears Prada”, saw the Miranda character, and thought,”This would make a great smear story about Megan!”
PS. Who is Sloane?
Per Google (because I didn’t know) it refers to wealthy, upper class young women.
It refers to a girl/woman who lives in Sloane Square in London, aristocratic or wealthy. Diana was considered a Sloane.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloane_Ranger,
Back in Diana’s day they were called the “Sloan Rangers,” basically rich kids from old money families who’d been to expensive boarding schools and were now living in a very expensive neighborhood (Sloan Square) in a flat that had been bought for them as an investment. Like the American Preppy, but about the actual being rich, not just the fashion/lifestyle.
That first paragraph of the excerpt is very well stated. However, I think she got confused about who she’s talking about. Sounds like a perfect description of Will and Kate; in fact, pretty much most of the RF. I will say, though, that emotional intelligence sounds like a very sophisticated concept for someone like Sarah Vine. She must be doing a little extracurricular reading, either here or on some other more Sussex friendly accounts. Hard to believe she really understands what it means.
Emotional intelligence is something Harry has a lot of and Vine has very little of.
In her autobiography she talks about having very few friends and being desperate for people to like her, not the experience of someone with bucket loads of emotional intelligence. Someone with emotional intelligence would have refused to write this article!
Sarah can do bet than this. The interview scene with the young woman is literally directly out of the Devil Wears Prada. Sitting at her desk, reading papers and ignoring her and then dismissing her with a Miranda Priestly “That’s All”. The screenplay writer should sue Sarah for plagiarism. Surely this is a send up for the readers.
Just seeing your comment after I replied similarly. That was absolutely where this supposed event came from.
RIGHT, here are two convenient ten year old stories that i’ve never mentioned, that provide ample evidence of this person’s bad behavior. Also come on. Are you telling me this person saw someone in a hotel and remembered their face well enough for years later to say, oh that’s the lady dating Prince Harry now? They need to get a job with a spy agency because their recall is ridiculous. And that this 20 year old with no experience was being interviewed for a role, as the literal duchess did it?
I have to agree this sounds like some CEO/secretary fanfic. They think you walk into a real estate office for berkshire hathaway and Warren Buffett is sitting behind the desk to interview you. It’s wild that a newspaper can and will just print blatant lies.
Sure Jan.
God, that bit about “weaponising his pain” is pure DARVO and highly vindictive as well as sinister. And this is when it dawns on me: the tabloids treat Harry like a kid who survived a mafia hit on his mother, only to find that mafia is still in power. And they are the Sarah Vines of the world, and her ilk. My god. It’s like they expect him to kiss the ring. William was finally forced to knuckle under to these people whilst Harry told them to bugger off and I suspect that is the real bedrock of William’s psycho grudge against his brother.
Yeah, William is one heartbeat away from the throne. If her wants the crown he has to bend the knee to the British press.
Oh so wait, Sarah Vine has been sitting on that story about Meghan at SoHo house for a decade and has just now decided to share it?? this is the first we’re hearing of her berating a staff member for the size of her goodie bag??? Please. This is the kind of crap they wish they had made up in 2018. It just came to poor Sarah Vine years too late.
Will these people like Vine ever stop? It’s seven years since Harry and meghan left! SEVEN. They keep writing stories to smear an innocent couple who lives a continent away and they are financially independent and they ignore the couple who lives lavishly on the tax payers money with an unacceptable behaviour several times in front of cameras. But, hey, don’t believe your lying eyes, the other couple is perfect, never putting a foot wrong. These constant attacks could they be considered libellous? Vine and the rest should be accountable for their lies and their efforts to destroy Meghan’s good name.
They are deeply deeply bitter and they want him back. Back and under control. With or without Meghan. With Meghan is just a bonus for them so they can make her life miserable up close and personal plus they want access to their children. The press and royal family’s nice little understanding only works if the press is allowed to smear junior members of the monarchy while keeping the senior ones untouched. What happens when you have no access to the spare’s family to uplift the heir’s? What is the media to do?
THIS is why the media is spiraling looking at the future and panicking. They want Harry to want to come back. Just see Shane watson’s article basically begging him to come to Balmoral bc there are bagpipes there
The first story is obviously crap, but I think the second story is about KATE. They are doing another opposites day routine and switching names to fit a narrative, just like the crying story and the way they planted M’s name in the police records after Kate had broken the Covid laws and presented herself to be photographed pretending to care about that poor girl who was murdered. Both of Sarah Vine’s “sources” appear to be from within Kensington Palace. M is not t he sort of woman to complain about a goodie bag – publicly or privately.
They’re still pining for Harry, these desperate hags. The man isn’t “considering his future within the royal family”. He is clearly quite contented outside of it with his wife and children and extended family, genuine friends and colleagues in “overseas”. 🙂