The Sussexes are ‘rankled’ by the palace calling them ‘private citizens’

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were “surprised” by Buckingham Palace’s clarification letter about their (lack of) royal status, their HRH abeyance and the fact that they are not working royals or backdoor half-in royals. Since BP’s letter was released, the Sussexes’ spox issued the “surprised” statement and then Team Sussex has made a huge deal over the timeline of the statement and when they were informed and why they were not allowed to give input on the statement. From the outside looking in, it seems like Prince Harry and Meghan are surprised that the Humiliation Factory only manufactures humiliations. I really don’t know what they told themselves about how this move would go down, but their surprise is the most surprising thing to me. Speaking of, the Telegraph got yet another briefing from Team Sussex and there’s some fascinating insight into the Sussexes’ mindset.

On the face of it, it is a rather unremarkable letter. The Lord Chamberlain, head of the royal household, simply sets out what we already know: that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are no longer working members of the Royal family, that they cannot use their HRH titles and are no longer represented by Buckingham Palace. But of course, things are never that simple when it comes to Prince Harry and Meghan.

The letter, sent to “key stakeholders” such as government officials, military figures and Lords Lieutenant, has only served to highlight the bitter tensions and distrust between the couple and the Palace courtiers they loathe. There is no doubt that the Duke and Duchess were taken entirely off guard when their office received this missive about their status on Monday. There was also no doubt that they were not remotely happy about it.

First, the timing. As it happens – coincidentally, the Palace insists – this seemingly innocuous email was shared just before a meeting that could determine whether or not the Sussexes are given police protection. The all-important Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) meeting, scheduled to take place this week, marks the climax of a deeply personal battle that Prince Harry has fought for more than six years.

The Home Office committee will discuss the findings of a risk assessment conducted in July. It will then decide whether the current threat level justifies a change in tack, whether the King’s younger son and his family should now be entitled to some form of taxpayer-funded police protection, or whether another risk assessment should be conducted now they are on UK soil.

The Duke is convinced that his protection was withdrawn as some kind of punishment for quitting royal duties. It is hard to overestimate what this decision means to him, wrapped up as it is in layers of personal trauma concerning the death of his mother, his relationship with his father and his status within his family and the wider institution. It is no secret that the Duke does not trust the courtiers who work for the royal household. He does not like Sir Clive Alderton, the King’s private secretary, who sits on Ravec, and who, he is convinced, has been a key player in the decision to deny him security.

It is unsurprising then that the timing of this letter, this punchy reminder that he and his wife are “private citizens” and should be treated as such, has raised eyebrows. The very term rankles. If they were truly private citizens, such formal guidance would not be necessary, or so the argument goes. The Duke remains the King’s son, and they are therefore public figures who cannot conduct normal lives. The language, as always, is key. And there is little room for nuance.

This is not a quick note dashed out on a whim. It is a carefully considered document intended to set the tone for the couple’s work and status in the UK. The letter will be widely interpreted as a shot across the bow, a warning to Prince Harry and Meghan that they have made their bed and they must lie in it. They should not, it suggests, benefit from public funds and other “courtesies” from the state.

The Duke’s spokesman admitted they had been taken aback when it landed in their inboxes. “We were a little surprised to not have been told about this in advance,” he said. The suggestion that they should have been consulted prompted guffaws at the Palace. But within Camp Sussex, no one was laughing.

The letter is the first official communication from the royal household about Harry and Meghan’s return from the United States. It may seem innocuous. But whatever the truth about its timing, it demonstrates just how far apart these two branches of the House of Windsor remain.

[From The Telegraph]

The most generous thing I can say is that there’s nuance on both sides of this situation. The Windsors are justifiably worried about the Sussexes in their backyard, stealing royal thunder and becoming the main characters of every royal story. The clarifying statement was an effort from the Windsors to say “actually, we’re not involved with the Sussex circus, they’re on their own.” Which, let’s be fair, has been the Windsors’ message for years. Harry and Meghan clearly believe that things have changed because of their move, that Harry cannot help the fact that he’s the king’s son, and that the situation needs to be handled differently, with conversations rather than clarifications and conventions. Harry is right that things have changed. But the palace has never backed down from their immovable stance either, you know?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

17 Responses to “The Sussexes are ‘rankled’ by the palace calling them ‘private citizens’”

  1. Brassy Rebel says:

    “The Humiliation Factory only manufactures humiliations.” There you go again! You really do need to trademark these truth bombs. I will just say that I don’t lump Meghan in with Harry. I think she’s trying to keep her family together and the only way to do that right now is to placate Harry who, as I keep saying, is a Windsor male. I hope for the best for her because she deserves so much better than she is getting from her husband atp. And, yes, I know she is a strong woman with agency. Strong women have less than perfect husbands too.

  2. maisie says:

    this whole mess is so so so baffling to me. Why are they in England? WHY? why would Meghan willingly put her children under the jurisdiction of the Crown? why would she return to live in a place where she and her kids would be subjected to this? If their marriage was faltering this surely seems the way to end it, and not in a manner that will be in any way to her benefit.

    this is all going to end in tears.

    • sunniside up says:

      In Britain the King is legally Archie’s guardian, and when the King dies William will become the guardian of both of them. William does not have their wellbeing within his interests. I wonder if he could actually stop the children leaving before they are 18.

  3. Mads says:

    My take on this statement has changed to seeing it as something quite sinister rather than stating the obvious.

    The 2020 statement was an acknowledgment that the Sussexes were stepping back but still “much loved members of the family” because the institution was planning on them having to return; the statement afforded them some protection and allowed Harry to maintain access to government officials, military staff and still be acknowledged as members of the royal family when travelling overseas for Invictus and charitable purposes; that status has been publicly stripped away.

    The Lord Chamberlain’s statement on behalf of the King is giving official notice to the Establishment, other countries and the media that Harry and Meghan are 100% on their own and not even considered royal adjacent. Harry is going to find himself in a similar situation to that of his mother after her divorce: access blocked and things becoming more difficult.

    The irony is that Harry has played into Charles and the institution’s hands by moving back to the UK and handing them a reason to issue the statement and effectively exile him from being a royal (I know it sounds ludicrous but that’s how the system works); if they had stayed in the US this wouldn’t have happened. I expect Letter Patent to be issued before the end of the year.

    Harry needs to wake up leave this pit of vipers and return to their US support network rather than stay and be further humiliated, because that’s the future here unfortunately.

  4. Sigh says:

    I may believe a Sussex spokesperson from their UK office said they were surprised a letter was released. But now ithe British media with all these “sources”.
    They just waiting for Harry to speak and then complain he can’t keep family matters private.

    • HandforthParish says:

      Well, the latest is that they are annoyed at being deemed ‘private citizens’ and want to be referred to as ‘public figures’ (which in itself, doesn’t mean anything official in terms of special treatment).
      This is apparently coming from their camp, according to the press.

      Regardless of what really happened, the optics are not good for them right now. I feel they have been played.

      • M says:

        They played themselves by walking straight into the vipers’ nest. I guess Harry thought proximity and grandkids would change things, but Charles never gave a damn about his own children, so why would he start now? It’s the stupidest thing they could have done. Trade your peace for this mess? Dumb.

  5. Mumster says:

    At first, when I saw the story, I was like “they just need to stop with the fake outrage. They are not working royals. They are private citizens. Like they wanted. The statement just confirms that.” But seeing the explanation about the timing and the full name of the committee (royalty and vip ex committee), I can see that it was meant to throw a wrench in the deliberations of the committee. If he’s a private person, he doesn’t need private security. But why wouldn’t he fit into the “VIP” part of it? At the end of the day, he is still the king’s son and his kids are the reigning monarch’s grandkids. They could be valuable to some nefarious characters.

  6. Hypocrisy says:

    I’m just waiting and watching to see how this all shakes out…

  7. Amy Bee says:

    As I said on another post, I understand Harry and Meghan’s reaction to letter and the fact that it was published because the Palace is seemingly trying to influence the outcome of the security meeting that supposed to happen this week. Nevertheless it was still unwise to move back to the UK without guarantees that they were going to be protected.

  8. Pumpkin says:

    This is why I was saying yesterday they needed a better and stronger statement. Because the vague one has allowed for a narrative to be manufactured. Yes it would have been manufactured regardless but it would be a lot harder to do.

    A statement along the lines of “The letter simply reiterates what everyone already knows from the last six years. The duke and duchess will continue to continue to live and conduct any work in the same manner they always have.”

  9. L4Frimaire says:

    Now that everyone has been blindsided in some way, it’s time to move on. The Sussexes need to get away from strife mode and focus on the good things in their lives. We generally think they’re hardworking but they never talk about what they’re working on, what they’re passionate about right now. Meghan had some very successful launches for AsEver but it’s not bring hyped, no talk of projects, upcoming events. What’s going on with Invictus? They need to mute the Royals and get on with living their lives in this new normal. They’re giving pessimism right now and people who root for them are tired. It’s showing up here everyday. Just give people a positive bone, something, anything, They consciously made this move, their decision. Be decisive.

  10. sunniside up says:

    The Telegraph has really gone downhill since it joined the tabloids.

  11. Sharon says:

    I was surprised it was released the day before George’s first day at Eton, as it naturally overshadowed it. But I can see now that they wanted it released before Tuesday, when the security meeting was originally to be held. Good ‘ol Clive again. Cant wait till he’s gone. I do kind of wish the Sussex team hadn’t responded at all.

  12. M says:

    “The leopards won’t eat MY face” says the gazelle raised by leopards. The FAFO portion of the proceedings is coming much too soon for Team Sussex. This move was always going to be a disaster anyway.

  13. YankeeDoodles says:

    The late Queen was always very specific about her language and compartmentalisation of family / work / status / privilege with the obvious exception of Andrew, and I can forgive her for not understanding — or wanting to understand — her own son’s depravity, especially now that we’re seeing *so many* men of his generation exposed for what seems to have been generalised depravity. But the late Queen did not play the mind games that Charles does. The gatekeeping, the gaslighting, etc…. The point-scoring, the scapegoating, the sly shade, the passive aggression, he just gets super sloppy. He’s tabloid fodder. Really. He has a very grandiose self-image but precious little dignity (hello, tampon) …William is just a psychotic raging dude with most likely a drinking problem. It’s the combination of the two of them that makes this situation impossible.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment