Aaron Sorkin’s ‘The Social Reckoning’ covers Jan. 6th without mentioning Trump

Aaron Sorkin is just one of those guys who loves to talk. Now that he’s a director, he’s happy to be front-and-center for promotion too. Which is why he’s giving interviews around The Social Reckoning, the “sequel” to David Fincher’s The Social Network. Sorkin won an Oscar for the Social Network script, and I guess Fincher didn’t want to direct the sequel, so Sorkin stepped in as director. This film follows Facebook as it grapples with whistleblower Frances Haugen going public. Sorkin chatted with Vanity Fair about the film, reshoots, the current state of social media and why he didn’t include Donald Trump’s name one time in the film.

Why he did reshoots after the trailer came out: “[Sony Pictures chairman and CEO] Tom Rothman just offered, “If there’s anything you could go back and rewrite or reshoot, would you do it?” And I said, “Yeah, I would go back and rewrite and reshoot the whole thing. I always want to do that.” But realistically, there were two scenes I wanted to rewrite and another I wanted to reshoot and another I just wanted to add. And so he opened the checkbook and gave us three days of shooting….We weren’t correcting anything. There are two kinds of reshoots that are done: One is the “Oh, we’re in trouble. We need to reshoot this.” And that usually happens on $150 million superhero movies. The other kinds of reshoots are “Oh, we really like this movie. It’s good. Let’s make it better.”

He rejoined Facebook while writing this script: “On my first day back on Facebook now, Facebook 2.0, because, wow, was it different back in 2009 when I was writing The Social Network. But the first thing that came up in my feed happened to be a picture of a dachshund. I like dachshunds, so I thought, Well, okay, you got to start training the algorithm. And I liked it. And from that point forward, all Facebook was for me was pictures of dachshunds. My entire Facebook experience is just pictures of dachshunds. [VF: “You’re a dachshund extremist now.”] Right, I’ve been radicalized.”

While January 6th is part of the film, Sorkin never used Trump’s name: “I want to be clear: I was never asked to do that, to not mention Trump by name. I turned in the script and a day or two later met with Tom Rothman, who was full speed ahead on it. And I promised him, unprovoked, that we would not see any Trump signage, no “Make America Great Again.” The movie is about Facebook’s role and the rise of divisiveness, extremism, and hyper-partisanship in the country. It is not a red-blue thing, even though, obviously, it will be felt that way.”

What’s the solution to fix the political divisions? “Honestly, I’m really starting to think that, for answers to that question that you’re asking, we need to consult cult experts. You hear people say, “It’s a cult. It’s a cult.” And I think what they’re saying is it’s like a cult, and I believe that. I know that cult experts and mental health experts have been trying to get our attention for a while. Maybe the answer is just the right leader, but I have a hunch that’s only the answer in West Wing world.

Can Meta redeem itself? At one point, Bill Burr’s character says, “Change a one to a zero or a zero to a one. Just do it.” Yes, Meta can redeem itself. Become what it was supposed to be: a force for good and connecting people. Sorry to keep quoting the movie, but Mark says at the end of the argument, “This is a business, Charlie. You know why we don’t fact-check ads: because we don’t have to.” Make them have to. The responsibility is with the laws—pass laws.

What kinds of movies he’d like to see: “I’d like to see Hollywood make movies where the press are the heroes. The low level of trust in traditional news sources is dangerous, and I think film and television can help.

[From Vanity Fair]

But… how can Sorkin put J6 in there without ever mentioning Trump by name?? Like, I would understand it if he managed to keep Trump’s name off the script by not even dealing with J6, but if you’re going to address those acts of treason, you have to speak the cult leader’s name. You have to address the reason why all of those methheads stormed the Capitol. Sorkin is right that this is a cult situation and should be dealt with, psychologically and politically, like half the country has been brainwashed.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

12 Responses to “Aaron Sorkin’s ‘The Social Reckoning’ covers Jan. 6th without mentioning Trump”

  1. apostrophe says:

    “But… how can Sorkin put J6 in there without ever mentioning Trump by name?”
    Because “The movie is about Facebook’s role”.
    I certainly hope it’s effective. People learn in different ways; we need more voices in more venues pointing out the evils of the current tech juggernaut.

    • Delphine says:

      I stopped using Facebook because of its role in all of this.

    • mblates says:

      nobody cares, and this move might make people care for 10 minutes or awards season talk or whatever, but no one will change their social media habits and the needle won’t move. how many people still use facebook, instagram and threads every day?

      • Sarah says:

        A lot less then have, their numbers are going down. It’s mostly bots now. The more people learn the more they walk away.

  2. Jegede says:

    When the face matched the shoes.🫤🫤

    He looks like whatsherface from There’s Something About Mary.

  3. Booboochile says:

    He is just Ed Sheeraning himself at this point.

  4. jferber says:

    Is he afraid to mention Trump by name as the planner and instigator of the resurrection? Or are the people funding the project scared? Total bullshit NOT to go after Trump for this because it was his lies and refusal to admit he lost that provoked him. I remember seeing ads beforehand telling people to come to the White House on January 6 and it would be a “wild” day. It certainly was. Our president committed high treason and he gets a pass for it every day and everywhere. Total bullshit.

  5. io says:

    That is a terrible fit

  6. Tis True, Tis True says:

    LOL They totally lied to him about why studios pay for reshoots.

    Never saw The Social Network because of my strong dislike of Sorkin, dating from A Few Good Men. The bits of his work I have seen since haven’t improved my opinion. Zéro plans to see this. He’s just such pandering weak sauce.

  7. Sarah says:

    I mean seems odd to not mention trump, but if you’re looking at how Facebook exasperated the situation and made it worse. Like they were planning it out in the open and the company did nothing, then it could work. I guess we will have to see. I think on one hand it’s a mistake to ignore him, on the other I think it makes a lot of sense because mentioning him will change the conversation around the movie.

    And I think we really need to be discussing what social media and the tech companies are doing.

  8. Aimee says:

    @tistrue “pandering weak sauce” is perfectly put.

  9. JFerber says:

    Sarah, exacerbated, I think. Sorry to be an obnoxious corrector. As a former English teacher, I can’t NOT do it.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment