The Guardian: Petty Duchess Kate isn’t showing ‘the most civilized example’

09-03-2020   Commonwealth Day Celebrations  Westminster Abbey 2020...

I’m writing this because several people sent it to me and several people have been trying to threadjack other royal stories with this. I don’t make it a rule to cover observational columns about the royals unless they carry actual news or gossip. This did neither. Catherine Bennett at the Guardian wrote an op-ed called “With Meghan and Harry, Kate reveals she is up to carrying out that vital royal duty… bearing a grudge against relatives.” You can read the full piece here. The piece hits many sweet spots, saying that we were led to believe that the younger royals “are more empathetic than their sourer, or weirder elders” and that while William and Kate’s “performed relatability” (aka cosplaying normalcy) came across as “Marie-Antoinetteishness,” a lot of people bought the idea that the Cambridges had more emotional intelligence than their predecessors. But that idea blew up a week ago when Kate couldn’t even fake congeniality towards the Duke and Duchess of Sussex:

Courtesy of their hilarious double act in Westminster Abbey, it seems much more likely that William and Catherine are already, as inheritance edges closer, about as emotionally literate as Prince Philip, as careless of their status as Prince Andrew, and as supremely forgiving to outcasts as the late Queen Mother. With a few differences. The old Queen could at least cite, as the justification for a lifelong grudge, her conviction that Wallis Simpson had devastated her own family life and ruined her husband’s health. All Meghan Markle appears to have done to deserve a comparable level of visible ostracism from Kate and William is to conclude – admittedly rather late, and with scant notice – that a lifetime dedicated to trailing mutely in their wake would be unbearable. As a result, one hears the left-behind royals may now have to open more things and meet more subjects than usual.

You can see why this might seem, as well as a nuisance, a rather pointed commentary on the ghastly, state-maintained life that Kate Middleton wanted for herself. But even so. It’s not as if Meghan taught Kate’s kids to Nazi salute. And even minus their pretensions to leadership in talking/reaching out, blanking rarely-seen family members in a church, in public, isn’t the most civilised example from the Cambridges, future leaders of the family that, according to its own website, symbolically unifies the nation. Some viciously divorced civilians do better than this every week. Moreover, beaming impartially at friends and enemies is not even, unlike the Cambridges, a vital part of their day job.

Kate, in particular, has previously demonstrated huge professionalism in this respect, bestowing the same, dazzling smile on Narenda Modi, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping as she does, crouching down in the curious way that royals consider essential in all child-encounters, on an innocent tot. Whatever crime Meghan and Harry have committed to be denied the same favour, it presumably strikes the Cambridges as worse than – to pick at random, from the above guests’ specialities – sexual predation, brutal dictatorship and tolerating extreme violence against women and girls.

In the Abbey scene, surely the finest among the multiple glories of Harry and Meghan’s season one finale, we see a seated Meghan, smiling and waving like a pro at the approaching, then suddenly unsmiling Cambridges, who turn their backs, converse with everyone but them, then fall – William going, unsuccessfully, for dignified composure, Kate pursing into an unforgiving little face that would have discomfited the chattiest of tyrants – to ignoring them for the rest of the ceremony. Meghan, meanwhile, radiates artless goodwill.

Her showy, green, caped outfit has already been acclaimed – along with its companion blue, and red pieces – as a superlatively choreographed, Diana-beating exercise in revenge dressing, but nothing confirmed the triumph that was the Sussexes’ peerlessly executed exit better than the antics of his family. An intended official humiliation – with the Sussexes ostentatiously excluded from a royal parade – concluded as a disastrous face-off: Eloi 1; Morlocks nil. By this time all but Meghan’s most dementedly racist persecutors must have spotted that, although well advised to swerve the oppressive littleness of much royal life, she is at the same time, given her ability to turn a secondary school visit into a touching national moment, its finest practitioner. All the family had to do was, for an hour or so, endure.

[From The Guardian]

Yes. It is funny. Yes, it is an example of William and Kate’s continued pettiness. The surprising thing about it wasn’t the big reveal that Will and Kate are small, petty people, it’s that they can’t even pretend to be anything else. We knew that about them long ago, but we knew it because William leaked against his family members and because Kate employed people to embiggen her every pained, forced smile. But there it was, out in the open, on Commonwealth Day. The hostility, the meanness, the small cruelty.

News

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

191 Responses to “The Guardian: Petty Duchess Kate isn’t showing ‘the most civilized example’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Snazzy says:

    “about as emotionally literate as Prince Philip, as careless of their status as Prince Andrew, and as supremely forgiving to outcasts as the late Queen Mother.” Amazing

    • OriginalLara says:

      Isn’t it? This sentence alone is everything.

    • BW says:

      “Eloi 1; Morlocks nil”

      Bwa-hahahhahha. I love this reference.

      • betsyh says:

        I had to look up this reference because I have never read H.G. Wells. From Wikipedia: “The Morlocks and the Eloi have something of a symbiotic relationship: the Eloi are clothed and fed by the Morlocks, and in return, the Morlocks eat the Eloi.” I agree, this is a delicious comment!

    • Bella DuPont says:

      I’m surprised there’s no mention of Sophie and her desperation to parlay this situation into elevation of their status as “the new Fab Four”. More like The Drab Four. 🙄

      • Abena Asantewaa says:

        I will cut Sophie some slack, she had just returned from Sudan, probably tired. I hear she has not been feeling well. Probably did not want to be there

    • And let’s not forget Kaiser’s last line above….” The hostility, the meanness, the small cruelty.” Spot on! Thanks Kaiser for bringing attention to this article and discussing it. When I read it several days ago, I was thrilled that a British journalist publicly went there and pulled no punches in doing so. The Cambridge’s behaved badly in a public ceremony in a house of God, sitting 3 seats away from the Queen. My question to William, is: “Are you sure it’s Harry disrespecting the Queen, William and not you?” Because to my way of thinking the Cambridge’s not only showed their nasty asses about the Sussexes, by doing so at that ceremony they totally disrespected the Queen. PS — I loved this article so much, I actually made a donation and subscribed for full access to The Guardian on line. I pulled up other articles by this journalist and sh is a delightful read. This isn’t the first time she’s written about Sussexit or the family’s behavior.

      • Some chick says:

        <3 THANK YOU <3 for subscribing to the Guardian!

        I am a (US) Poor and I am soooooo grateful for the lack of paywall on the G. The only reason they can do it is because of generous donors like you.

        I really appreciate it! Thank You, JALCL!!! And all who donate to the Guardian. They are the Real Deal.

        <3 THANK YOU <3

    • Abby says:

      This op-ed is… everything. Wowser!

    • Mac says:

      Let’s not forget the queen’s pettiness at excluding Harry and Meghan from walking in with the family. Just unnecessary.

      • AnnaKist says:

        Yes I thought about this, too, Mac. I also realised that the BRF is nothing like the Mafia, as I once used to think. In the mafia, o Marta who you are, if you leak against the family…

      • betsyh says:

        I wish I knew who made the decision that the Cambridges not be in the procession. (And why.) Their anger was palpable.

      • Abena Asantewaa says:

        I think the courtiers drew out the program, and excluded the sussexes. I believe, someone, it could be Charles, or Baroness Scotland; General Sec of The Commonwealth, must have pointed it out that it would not be a good look to exclude The President and Vice President of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, so They pulled The Cambridges out of the procession. I bet the hierachy mad Kate, was not pleased about that, because it took them down a peg or two. She behaved badly, and uncivil, because she has been emboldened by the media, who are sycophantic towards her and Wills. The Guardian article was just spot on!

      • Some chick says:

        I still think that Harry didn’t want to do it – hence not being listed in the printed program.

        Why/how the Cambridges entrance went the same way is an open question.

    • LahdidahBaby says:

      Brilliant and tragic.

    • LahdidahBaby says:

      Kate’s “dazzling smile” might be better described as her desperate, hollow Chucky grin. It’s as facially deforming and as empty as Chucky’s scary smile, and there really is *no THERE there.*

    • Alyse says:

      That sentence deserves a pullitzer lol, amazing!

    • PrincessK says:

      That article was first class! Bravo Catherine Bennett and thanks Kaiser for flagging it up!👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

    • PrincessK says:

      One day we will find out whose decision it was to pull the Sussexes out of the royal parade, leading to the Cambridge’s being taught a lesson by being pulled out too. I suspect it was to avoid pictures of the four of them standing together waiting for Camilla, Charles and the Queen. William did not want to have to make small talk with the Sussexes. Insiders have always said that William has a sneaky and petty character from childhood. I am very much sure that the plan was not cooked up by 93 year old Queen Elizabeth.

      • Dinah says:

        The old lady has already lost control over her family. It was her first courtier, her private secretary, who had taken the Sussexes out of the procession. Harry and Meghan were probably okay with that; they were already on senior royal exit. But not the Commonwealth Secretariat / The Baroness. She thought the optics of it could strengthened the sentiment of the bad treatment of H&M by the royal family. To prevent this from happening (no it still did), the Cambridges were told, at last minute, that they too would be escorted directly to their seats. That didn’t go well with the Cambridges, who, as we know, are very aware of their prominent position above H&M. The next day, the British tabloids and the Kensington Palace PR machine wanted the people to believe that it was all goodwill of the Cambridges to offer not to be in the procession, because they didn’t want Harry and Meghan to sit by themselves at the start of the service. But that was a lie: in fact they were pissed off. Their shocking behaviour was at display for the global community at watch: their rude behaviour towards Harry and Meghan, their disrespect to the queen and the people & representatives of the Commonwealth nations. They showed the world their true colour (we been knew, by the way).

      • Feeshalori says:

        And if this excellent theory is correct, the Dour Duo blew all that planning to bits by their cold shoulders. If they went by the playbook and exhibited good manners to Harry and Meghan, people would have believed that they were willing to give up their places in the procession because of the international optics. They would have been lauded for their courtesy and professionalism towards the “outcasts.” But for William and Kate, it was all about their fragile egos and showing how much their noses were put out of joint. Major blunder for not wearing their game face And I hope it was worth all the negative press.

    • fishface says:

      Superb writing. Nailed it totally. Kate is petty and jealous. William is pouty and bratty.

  2. Scollins says:

    Wow! The world reads and takes the Guardian seriously. Bill and Kate are called out big time. As they should be. Damage to the monarchy like this is not a small thing.

  3. kellebelle says:

    When did she ever? She carries on somewhat in the face of rumors of her husband’s affair, but we’ve seen plenty of examples of “unprofessional,” which if they had been Meghan there would’ve been calls for her head. Snark: and her face appears to be melting. She is far too young to be aging like melting wax. She is trapped in a loveless marriage but she won’t go anywhere now with Queen Consort so close, will she? She wanted it? She got it, complete with Will’s wandering peen.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      To me Kate is an example of the saying ‘be careful what you wish for as you just might get it’. She got what she wanted but is she prepared to pay the price in full to get it – am not so sure. At some point the tabloids she and William are so desperate to keep feeding will turn on them, on her and her family is particular. They won’t attack William directly while he is still heir but her and her family are fair game regardless of their connections.

      • aria says:

        married in Windsor is always the target like Diana, Fergie, Meghan even autumn Philip got little abuse from daily mail because she left her hubby. married ins in Windsor are disposable that’s why Carole and kate are in panic mode. that’s why so many kate kissing articles of how the only kate can save the monarchy etc. The time and time proves that giving birth to the heir and spare doesn’t guarantee you the position. Diana gave birth to an heir and spare and she was kicked out of brf and left in cold.

      • kellebelle says:

        Yes to you both. Right on. I cannot believe that Harry and Meghan have essentially left, are on the other side of the planet, and still being bashed and badgered.

      • Lee says:

        You are right! She has already started to show her true colors in regards to Wills unfaithful willy and as each day passes, something else will slip from the closed doors at apartment 1A. She will be her own downfall. I can’t wait until she gets pregnant again, as that will allow Will to let his little willy play!

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @kellebelle – The British tabloids will NEVER leave Harry and Meagan alone because Harry & Meghan make the tabloids fu@k tonnes of money. William & Kate do not generate anywhere near the same click$ for revenue$.

        I hope the truth comes out in the court case and the Fail on Sunday loses their a$$ in the process.

      • February Pisces says:

        @aria and Diana was an aristocrat too. her sisters husband was the queens private secretary at the time of her death, and apparently he was one of the people she feared the most, her own brother in law. That family and those courtiers are a ruthless bunch. Kate knows she’ll get the Meghan/ Diana treatment eventually, no matter how much the middletons hustle with the press. It’s probably why she’s hanging on for dear life. In the end the house always wins.

  4. Beach Dreams says:

    The fact that outlets are still writing about this shows how much the Cambridges screwed up. And they know it too, otherwise there wouldn’t have been desperate articles trying to excuse Kate’s nasty behavior. We also wouldn’t have that weird PR article about Kate and the kids going shopping this weekend… and they happened to be spotted by the owner of a toy company. The same company who made a toy Charlotte received (and was pictured receiving) at the Christmas walk. The photo is on the company’s Instagram. Probably coincidence but it’s interesting how I haven’t seen any accusations of “merching” 🤔

    Regardless, it’s nice to see people finally recognizing Kate for the mean girl she always was. She puts on big grins and a mild/bland demeanor for a reason. I think too many people see that and get fooled into thinking she’s helpless or a simple bystander in the nastier dealings coming out of KP.

    • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

      Nice catch, @BeachDreams! If only the Daily Wail sycophants would pull their heads out of their collective backsides and stop stanning for a cold, dull, unpleasant woman who not only doesn’t know they don’t exist, she wouldn’t care if she did

    • Olenna says:

      That DoS hater narrative about merching is so hypocritical and mean-spirited. The trolls have repeatedly thrown verbal abuse at the Meghan style sites, yet never once have they (or anyone for that matter) criticized the Keen style sites.

    • Lee says:

      Do you truly think that the Cambridges have acknowledged that they are responsible for what has happened to Harry and Meghan? I am having a very hard time even considering that, as narcissistic they both are, that they acknowledge any responsibility. I don’t think that they care about anyone but themselves and how they are represented in the press. Though I do believe that Lazy Krazy is spiteful and will hold a grudge as long as their is breath in her lungs.

  5. L84Tea says:

    ” Whatever crime Meghan and Harry have committed to be denied the same favour, it presumably strikes the Cambridges as worse than – to pick at random, from the above guests’ specialities – sexual predation, brutal dictatorship and tolerating extreme violence against women and girls.”

    WOW.

  6. BabsORIG says:

    This article is the BOMB,💥💥💥💥 Booooom.💥💥💥 And thanks Kaiser for covering it, I know you said you don’t cover opinions articles but for me, I’d rather this than anything Fail related, so thank you.

  7. Nina says:

    Only fools see Kate as an innocent white bird.
    Her insecurity and périnées are visible in every single premature wrinkle that are assaulting her face

    • Marcy says:

      My opinion is that her insecurity and pettiness stems from the fact that she knows she looks washed out and tired next to the always glowing Meghan.

      • Royalwatcher says:

        I think it’s more than looks though. It’s also about seeing how head over heels Harry is for Meghan and knowing that she will NEVER have that with William. And also that her “third wheel” goodtime Harry knows who Kate really is and no longer has any time (or smiles or whispers) for her.

        Ultimately, I think Kate is super jealous of the love and affection Meghan receives. I’ll bet William gave her stories about how “royals aren’t allowed to show affection blah blah blah…” and now Kate knows that’s all a lie because Harry can’t keep his hands and heart-eyes off his wife. I think Kate would LOVE William to give her the same affection and public care that Meghan gets, even if she’d never admit it.

        I just read L84Tea’s comment below and agree partially, but I don’t even think Kate is jealous of Meghan’s ability to give speeches and work hard flawlessly. Because Kate doesn’t want to actually DO any of those things. IMO she lives for William and ‘being his wife’ and no longer being Waity-Katie, so I think what she wants is his attention and affection and is jealous of Meghan getting an obviously loved-up relationship. JMO though.

    • Lady D says:

      Hey Nina, can you please tell me what perinees is? I’ve looked it up for 5 minutes now and all google will give me is the dogs or the mountains.

      • TheOtherOne says:

        I looked it up too!

        perineum (English) is the area between the anus and the scrotum or vulva.

      • JennEricaMS says:

        @Lady D, I was curious also and I found a dictionary from the early 1800’s that describes it as another word for petulant, at least that was my take on it. It makes complete sense in this case if that is the correct translation.

      • Lady D says:

        Cool info, JennEricaMS. Thanks for letting me know that. Can I ask where you got to peruse a 1800’s dictionary. That must have been interesting to look at.

    • Bella DuPont says:

      It’s not really complicated. She’s jealous of Meghan and most likely has been from the very start. The feeling has only escalated with time and reached its peak during the farewell tour. Just plain, old fashioned jealousy.

      • L84Tea says:

        THIS. Normally I detest the word “jealous” being thrown around because it often sounds so childish, but in this case, it absolutely fits. I believe Kate, despite having a league of stans, is a very, very insecure person. I think she was and is very jealous of Meghan for basically having the whole package–she’s beautiful, educated, intelligent, had her own thriving career, is an incredibly hard worker, and managed to marry a prince, who very obviously loves and adores her and has no problem showing it. Not to mention all the other bits, like she also knows how to wear beautiful clothes, she knows how to deliver a speech flawlessly, she’s friends with amazing people around the world, she’s pulled off successful charities beautifully….I could go on and on.

        Kate came from a nice family and went to posh schools. She has a college education. Her parents had/have some money, so she got to go on nice vacations and wear pretty clothes. But she also sat around on her lazy butt for a DECADE and did nothing but be at her boyfriend’s beck and call. She made no career for herself despite having some of the best connections and opportunities. And when she finally, finally got the ring, she managed to stay on her lazy butt and avoid working at all costs. She may have also married a prince, but she’s managed to accomplish next to nothing (besides having children) in her years in the RF. Her husband appears as if he can hardly stand to be in her presence. Then along comes Meghan…

        Only an insecure person would put up with those Waity years and with William. Only an insecure and jealous person would do desperate pap strolls trying to keep attention on them. Only a green with envy jealous person would snub their family member on live international television, unable to hide their contempt after said family member was the belle of the ball in all the papers all weekend long. Kate is a jealous joke of a woman.

      • Lizzie says:

        Oh she is jealous and of someone she sees as beneath her. That is what burns.

      • You are on fire today L84Tea. Very good analysis. 👏🏼👏🏼 And ya know, I have no problem with Kate wanting to be a stay at home mom, if she’d just own it. She and William had the perfect opportunity to live the indulgent private life they wanted if they would have just given the Sussexes some space to do the hard work they were willing to do. After all, no matter what the Cambridge’s do or don’t do, William will be king. So, it really boils down to jealousy.

      • yinyang says:

        Kate changed the most the year Meghan came on board. She stopped the ass flashing, she hired Quinn, she started to dress more conservative Simon Case and Quinn helping with that, she started those buffoon like expressions. She started tailoring her clothes. It’s almost like she shed all the narratives about herself and pinned it on Meghan.

      • Nic919 says:

        What also adds salt to the wound is that Meghan is only five months older than Kate but looks way younger. She looks fresh and youthful whereas Kate has not looked like that in years. All the fillers, botox and brow lifts in the world don’t make up for lost youth.

        If Kate had substance then losing her looks wouldn’t matter as much, but Kate has only ever been a mannequin and she has entered the years where she can’t be considered young looking anymore. The extreme thinness is definitely part of her response to fighting Father Time. She will lose though, as we all do eventually.

    • February Pisces says:

      I just saw on Lipstick alley some Meghan hater posted some blind item. I didn’t read it but the jist of it was ‘Meghan jealous of Kate’s beauty’ or whatever… Its KP who get these blind item sites to trash Meghan, so kate must be really f*cking insecure and is DESPERATE to be hotter, sexier, more stylish and more popular than Meghan. The worst is the Meghan haters looking for reasons for Meghan for be jealous of kate. Kate just comes across as so pathetic at this point, I’m actually embarrassed for her.

    • February Pisces says:

      @nina kate stans are very much like kate herself, dull, plain, boring, no personality or charisma, that’s why they root for her. They see Meghan and women like her who happen to be attractive, smart, confident, charismatic etc as the ultimate threat, that must be defeated. They know kate and William are behind the smears. The deny it the same way racist say ‘what racism’, but they know and support it. They are desperate for the drab duchess to be seen as desirable just to validate their own desirability. Their biggest dream would be for Harry to fall in love with Kate,(that’s probably Kate’s biggest dream too).

  8. Solange says:

    Wow, she’s a great writer.
    I too found it strange that the Cambridges—who seem to constantly accuse others of emotionalism—couldn’t manage to stick a smile on their faces for a minute. Seems rather immature.
    Guess it’s one of the survival skills us normals learn in the real world?

    • Juniper says:

      This is what shocked me. Pretty much everyone can tolerate an annoying family member during a holiday dinner. These two fools couldn’t deign to condescend to be nice for five flipping minutes. It’s appalling.

      I’ve seen places where they have applauded Kate’s rude behavior. It’s terrible.

    • February Pisces says:

      @solange especially as the Cambridge’s are experts at faking happiness. Maybe they were trying to please the daily mail comments section who probably applauded the snub.

      • All I can say, Solange, is for both the Cambridge’s to be so angry they couldn’t hide it, I would love to know what happened to alter that procession into church behind the Queen. For all our theories over the last week, I still don’t think any of us really guessed right. Watching the Untelevised, pre-show of Cambridge’s being told to sit down and why, now that would have been a seriously entertaining popcorn-munching show. 😱

    • RoyalBlue says:

      It’s not at all strange because it was intentional. It was their intention to do a parting humiliation of the Sussexes and it looks like Sophie was in on the plan.

  9. Solace says:

    Kate: All that remains for me is to be the queen consort. I’ll keep my eyes on the prize as everything around me burns to the ground (courtesy my low value, petulant husband).

    Meghan: (smiles) Good luck with all that. All you’ll ever achieve is sacrificing yourself.

    Btw, this article on guardian is quite well written.😍

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      The look on Meghan’s face in that first photo is definitely, “Oh honey, you tried it. Bless your heart.”

      • That aisle stroll! Each one of those faces tell a different side to the same story. And, I will once again point out that William is doing the manhood protecting gesture with his hands. This guy is all about his manhood. Any body language experts care to way in on this constant hand usage of William’s? I’ve read some body language books and how you hold your hands in a public forum is — according to the experts — very revealing. 😎

      • Prof Trelawney says:

        to JA, just read a little about it — it’s when a guy feels vulnerable but is required to show confidence… fits I think. Feels like he’s been masking his jealousy and insecurities by attacking rather than growing as a person. I also think Kate’s head jutting forward is v unattractive, not sure what it means, maybe just bad posture, but it reminds me somehow of one of the ugly stepsisters…

      • Hi Prof Trelawney —. Hope you’re hanging in there with your 3 day and counting isolation. I agree, Kate does look like she wants to run down the aisle. I just love that photo as I think it captures what each of them is probably thinking. We could write thought balloons, the expressions are so revealing.

      • Prof Trelawney says:

        Thanks for your kindness JA, I really appreciate it. I’m assuming many of us are in the same boat (or our v own little boats) w isolating. I’m v fortunate to be able to work from home, and want to be as careful as possible to not pass it along, esp since I’m otherwise working and around many people so who knows. So far so good, and this site is such a fun diversion! Stay well too…and brava to any health care professionals or others on the frontlines of this.

        Now…back to body language — Kate’s posture when she’s at the pew also shows her head thrust forward, and hunched shoulders, I don’t know, like she’s trying not to stand tall lest she overshadow her husband or others? But also sort of rigid… Just looks evil step sisterish, and I don’t mean that as a criticism of her outside appearance but something from the inside coming through.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      @Solace – Everything published in and by The Guardian/Observer is very well written.

      At the Guardian, look up the political writer John Crace to read some of the best written OP-EDs ever.

  10. Summergirl says:

    I don’t think Kate has a mind of her own at all. She does what she thinks she is supposed to do/ what William wants her to go. It would not even occur to her to be warm and gracious to Meghan and Harry in the face of William’s obvious ire. Also, I wonder if she is deeply jealous of Harry’s obvious devoted love for Meghan. How much is she in touch with those feelings?

    • Bettyrose says:

      I have no insight into Kate’s mindset…but it’s hard to figure she wouldn’t notice the stark difference between H & M’s dynamics and her own marriage. If she feels like she’s always played by the rules and they’ve set fire to the rule book, guess resentment is understandable (and as all humans sometimes do she’s turning her resentment on the wrong party).

    • Tiffany says:

      She does. No excuses. She is a a-hole just like her husband.

    • bluemoonhorse says:

      She controls her own face – we hope. So yeah, no sympathy.

      • Summergirl says:

        Oh, I have no sympathy for her at all! I wasn’t trying to suggest that when I said she had no mind of her own. I think she is utterly empty, goes where she is told, and does what she think she is supposed to do. Is she a terrible person? Maybe. I tend to think there is just nothing there at all except her concern for status. Which is one of the worst ways a person could be, isn’t it?

    • Totally disagree Summergirl. I think Kate is a strong, mindful competitive (in the wrong way) woman who knows what she wants and fights hard to get it. I just do not see her as an empty-headed victim.

      • Summergirl says:

        Where did I say she was a victim? I said she’s empty and I had no sympathy for her. I think she’s pathetic, which to me is implied by empty, and no unlike you I don’t think she is strong–though yes competitive absolutely. I’ve often read comments here but just started commenting (what with social distancing etc.), but I see how frustrating it is to be misread and have things attributed to me that I did not say at all. Commenting is clearly not for me!!

      • Jane's Wasted Talent says:

        Summergirl- Please don’t give up, you’ve raised intelligent, interesting ideas.

    • Suz says:

      She’s been groomed since god knows how young by her mother to have one goal in life: to marry William. So yeah. I don’t think she ever even had a chance to develop a mind of her own.

      • Some chick says:

        She had many chances. She had a fancy education.

        She could have gone far. She threw it all away for a trifling dude.

    • yinyang says:

      That’s what she wants you to think, Kate is playing stupid, so she can take no accountability. I think Kate is more conniving and smarter than you think.

      • Travelin says:

        I agree. Kate is not stupid or empty headed. She is smart, conniving and competitive. I don’t think she has a lot of substance or really cares about people. Which is what I value. I think she felt very secure in her position and with the press and we saw a glimpse of the ice cold $&@@ that she can be. I wonder if they didn’t think the cameras would catch it? I think it has been pretty obvious that she felt threatened by Meghan. She stepped up her game seriously when Meghan came into the family. I am sure she has decades of practice of cutting people out and putting them in their place. But the idea that Kate just does what she is told and is too stupid to know better? No way.

      • yinyang says:

        @Travelin I won’t go into detail, but I once knew a woman a short while, she (unbeknowest to me at the time) PRETENDED to have a mental disability and acted very child-like. But I noticed when it came to things in terms of money she was very opportunistic and clever, almost too clever. Well it turns out, a few years later she was arrested for scamming a lot of people and the government too. The moral of the story, when people slip up and show their true selves, believe them!

  11. bitchy architect says:

    ah. thank god. something delightful to read during these anxious days. And about effing time.

  12. Jamie says:

    Does anyone have a link to the video of the ceremony? I’ve only seen a 30 second clip of the Cambridges sitting down.

  13. Carobell says:

    Rather than have team mates whose work would reflect positively on them, they have now set up Harry and Meghan as a rival team. It’s such a massive mistake as it is obvious Harry and Meghan intend to continue to work on projects that will receive international attention.

  14. Ksweet says:

    Finally!

  15. Bettyrose says:

    Deleting stupid comment. Aria nicely explained below I misread the point about Wallis Simpson.

    • aria says:

      no, she was talking about queen mother and his hubby where he smoked a lot because he can’t cope with being king.

      • Bettyrose says:

        OMG. Sorry. Of course. That was pre-Philip. Yes being King killed Liz’s father. Just waking up.

  16. Margareth says:

    LMAO the backlash was huge for the Cambridges and the Royal Family. Karma is real

    • Liz version 700 says:

      I now know that karma is indeed real and it is a beautiful rainbow of reds, blues and greens…

  17. Boo says:

    I’m sorry, that article had too many commas and was barely decipherable.

  18. Shoshone says:

    I actually stopped breathing while I read these quotations! Catherine Bennett just served up a gigantic flaming “sceptered isle” style burn to the petty Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Please do not mistake the comparatively understated (by American standards) tone of her column for a serving of relatively modest criticism. It is not. The English educated class are masters of the art of smiling and looking you directly in the eyes while absolutely excoriating you in the most polite and literate fashion conceivable. The Duke and Duchess have been called out.

    • anon says:

      Hardly literate, but that’s another discussion.

      • wendywoo says:

        @boo and @anon: The writing is spectacular. Just because you can’t comprehend the odd sentence with a subordinate clause doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t.

      • Jaded says:

        Perhaps you ought to read the Queen’s English a bit more, then you’ll understand.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @anon – If you are having trouble with this bit of the Queen’s English, I suggest you try Ford Madox Ford’s “Parade’s End” if you really want to get your mind tied up and worked out by a good mental reading exercise. LOL! LOL!

    • Agree Shoshone. She is deliciously English in her writing. Some of her other articles on the behavior of the royal family, especially Andrew, are truly a masterclass in that oh-so-polite snark the British excel in. One article where she goes after the British tabloid press is so hysterically spot on — and so brutal — I read it to my husband for a good laugh. I’d swear she must have been a staff writer for the Monty Python team at their best, but I know she wasn’t. Still, her social commentary is that good in my opinion!

      • aria says:

        jaded and wendywoo, nonnative English speaker like myself its hard to learn even though I studied English all my life because of so many lines used there unknown to nonnative speaker.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        @aria – True! However, you seem to be working very hard at it to master North American English. I find your comments very entertaining and extremely funny. Please keep up all the hard work.

  19. yokoohno says:

    “By this time all but Meghan’s most dementedly racist persecutors must have spotted that” YUPPPPPPP

  20. anon says:

    I saw this yesterday.

    Let me just say that while I agree with Bennett’s sentiments, her writing skills are The. Worst.

    Sentence after run-on sentence is strung together by a maze of commas and parenthetical asides that make me wonder just how exactly someone who is from the epicenter of the English Language managed to mangle this piece so badly.

    Exhibit A (This is literally ONE sentence, btw):

    “In the Abbey scene, surely the finest among the multiple glories of Harry and Meghan’s season one finale, we see a seated Meghan, smiling and waving like a pro at the approaching, then suddenly unsmiling Cambridges, who turn their backs, converse with everyone but them, then fall – William going, unsuccessfully, for dignified composure, Kate pursing into an unforgiving little face that would have discomfited the chattiest of tyrants – to ignoring them for the rest of the ceremony.”

    WTAF.

    That said, I’m glad someone in the British media finally held these two accountable. I said last week that they could have held it together for one miserable public appearance, but instead William and Kate acted like assholes for the world to see, giving us a glimpse of just how dumb and tone deaf these two really are. I hope H&M have good therapists in Canada.

    • Honeybeeblues says:

      Clearly you’ve not read Henry James. I’m a writer by profession, and this is spectacular! And, grammatically correct on all levels.

      • Andrew’s Nemesis says:

        @HoneyBeeBlues Am also a writer, and second your opinion! Beautifully written, and deadly.
        (Any opinion on Oxford commas, fellow Bitchies?)

      • ➕💯 Honeybeeblues. (See my comment directly above in response to Shoshone.). She is a terrific writer. And, I am all for Oxford commas, Andrew’s Nemesis. I highly recommend pulling up her other commentary articles with The Guardian, because she goes there each and every time!

      • Olenna says:

        I had no problem with the article. I thought it was excellent writing and a masterful take-down.

      • Jaded says:

        @Andrew’s Nemesis: I’m all for Oxford commas!

      • Roo says:

        It was beautifully written. And, you can remove the Oxford comma from my cold, dead hands!

      • BayTampaBay says:

        See my comment above regarding Ford Madox Ford.

    • Jaded says:

      Try reading some Jane Austen, George Eliot (Mary Anne Evans), Evelyn Waugh, Thomas Hardy, not to mention current authors like Philipa Gregory or Christopher Hitchens. Or does this sentence run on too long and test your patience?

    • Ashley says:

      Thank you! I thought I was the only one. It hurt my head to read that article. It was like an episode of Gilmore Girls where you have to translate every obscure pop culture reference and every Proustian run on sentence. I read a lot, I write sometimes, that writing was awful. I caught some of the shade but it was trying too hard. I don’t understand all the praise. Especially by the poster above who sneered at another poster that she wasn’t deep enough to look past some commas (gurl wut?). No, it’s just bad writing. It was like a stream of the writer’s unconscious thoughts, and sorry but I do not want to experience anymore of what goes on in her head. Did an editor not scan this before print?

      Henry James, sir down 🙄

      • Jaded says:

        Maybe you should do an editorial scan before you post. “Henry James, sir down”?

        She writes beautifully, articulately and with barely disguised poison, something the Brits are very good at. “gurl wut?” Ya, that’s great writing….

      • Honeybeeblues says:

        Ashley, don’t ever try Edith Wharton. You might not recover from that headache.

    • Wisca says:

      Your example is not a run-on sentence. I’d argue that her prose style purposely mirrors the 18th & 19th century novel of manners. In this case, the writer is paying careful attention aristocratic behavior. The commas and digressions are a prominent, delightful feature.

      • Elizabeth says:

        Now come on. LOL at those trying it on with calling a Guardian op-ed “bad writing.” That is very good writing. You’re literally projecting your own insecurity via megaphone. And some of you reallllllly have no clue what a run-on sentence is. Properly punctuated, it doesn’t matter how long a sentence is! Furthermore, this is an old debate between practiced and prescribed!

        I am sometimes embarrassed when I don’t recognize a word/reference or can’t pronounce something correctly, but, you know, that’s just an opportunity to learn. We have to not let ourselves get down if we don’t know everything immediately.

        Catherine Bennett did not write this article as a personal attack on you. (I’m assuming you’re not Kate.)

        Don’t feel bad about it, but also don’t attack someone just because they wrote above your current level. Enjoy it if you can, and maybe learn something new.

    • BarbN says:

      I’m currently reading Tess of the D’Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy. He wrote just like this throughout the book.
      It’s a fairly archaic style to our modern eyes, and thus a bit hard to follow – but it’s literate.

    • Waitwhat? says:

      As someone else has already commented, the example you give is not a run-on sentence; it’s a compound-complex sentence, meaning it’s composed of both independent and dependent clauses. [And a number of reduced relative clauses and some adjectival phrases.] There are no grammatical errors in it, which is impressive, actually. (Fun fact, the Guardian used to be infamous for its typos and is still known in Private Eye as “The Grauniad” or sometimes just the Graun, after a particularly egregious error where a sub-editor misspelt the paper’s own name.)

      It’s also odd that you associate being from “the epicentre of the English language” with good writing because, a) millions more people outside the UK speak English now than actually live in Britain and b) location (and “native speaker”-ness) is no indication of proficiency, especially in writing.

      Her style may be too convoluted for your taste, and that’s a perfectly valid criticism, but this isn’t poor or inexpert writing.

      • Nic919 says:

        I focused on late 18th century and early 19th century English writers for my English lit degree and this is in the same style.
        It’s actually less convoluted than the early 18th c writings.

      • Roslyn says:

        I thoroughly enjoyed reading the article. By that I mean how it was written and how it flowed, not just the message it communicated. Despite, or perhaps because of, the long sentences and punctuation, I found it easy to read and comprehend. I didn’t notice anything unusual about its structure other than that it was well-written. It made my brain work though, and that is a good thing, IMO.

      • JennEricaMS says:

        @WaitWhat?, I think that was my complaint with the article. While I think I agree with the sentiments she expressed, it was a bit too intricate for me to work through at the moment. It doesn’t help that in the past 24 hours my 18 year old son was directly exposed to COVID-19 and is quarantining in his room for the foreseeable future, my 11 year old daughter started her period, and I’ve had 3 or so hours of sleep due to worry and stress. I honestly think Dr. Seuss might be too challenging for me at the moment. I’m hoping once things settle down and I get some sleep that I will be better able to process her words when I read the article again!

    • Stef says:

      Thanks for letting us know you’re not familiar with the classics, or exceptional English writing.

      I love the Oxford comma and appreciate when it’s used exquisitely.

      Love this beautifully written description of what many of us have been think for a while: Kate is a mean girl and the worst Sister in Law.

  21. Becks1 says:

    That article is amazing. Kate definitely showed her true colors in that moment.

  22. HoyaLawya says:

    I cackled.

    What a charmed life the Cambridges must lead where they never have to be civil to people they don’t like.

  23. JaneBee87 says:

    Thanks for covering this, Kaiser. Catherine Bennett is a very decent journalist. I wouldn’t describe her a a Meghan stan, but she gets that journalists have an obligation to call out the racism directed at M and name it for what it is. A few years ago, she also wrote a very entertaining weekly parody column from the perspective of then British PM’s wife, Samantha Cameron.

  24. Jess says:

    I love this piece. So good to see the Cambridges called out like this!

  25. MsIam says:

    I read this yesterday and thought “Boom! This is like Thor bringing down the lightening on the Cambridges’ petty @sses”, lol. In the the most polite, round about way of course. Even though they won’t change, I wonder if they felt the heat. I guess this will be the cue for another 10k in ridiculous articles about “Kate, the foundation of the monarchy” and “William, the strong, stable one”. Petty b!tches.

  26. C-Shell says:

    Agreed with the commentary on Bennett’s writing style as being a bit tough to unwind, but it made me reread a number of sentences that gave me so much pleasure. Flayed, positively skinned, the Cambridges and the tabloids. The only thing missing was similar treatment of Sophie Wessex, who richly deserves calling out.

    • Nic919 says:

      While Sophie could have been better behaved, going after her is a bit like punching down. She’s already lower in rank and just working angles to survive. Targeting the arrogant future future king and queen was much more fun and they deserve all the scorn.

  27. Murphy says:

    They need to grow some balls and call out WILLIAM loud and clear, not just Kate. Kate does what William wants. He said don’t go near, don’t acknowledge, and he even made sure to sit between them to make sure she couldn’t.

    • Call_me_Al says:

      Good call. Yes, Kate’s a Stepford wife, and is responsible for her own actions, but ultimately it’s Wills who’s icing out his own brother. He’s cold and gives me the shudders.

    • Alexandria says:

      Sorry even without William I have no doubt now that this woman is capable of being rude, racist and petty by herself.

    • Nic919 says:

      In this case though William was more polite than she was. The rudeness is entirely Kate’s own doing. If she is such a mindless doormat then perhaps she shouldn’t be raising kids. But we know she’s not, she just pretends to be.

  28. Bookie says:

    The Guardian is always after me to donate. Today I did.

  29. wendywoo says:

    What I can’t understand, or I can understand and can’t excuse, is that they knew what was coming. They knew H and M we’re going to be in attendance, they knew the timing, hell they even knew the seating arrangement and geography of the venue and STILL, Kate and Wills couldn’t see past their own sense of grievance and pretend to be civil. What arrogance and insularity to think this wouldn’t make them, and themselves only, look bad…

    • Beach Dreams says:

      Interesting isn’t it? As some other posters noted last week, W & K must’ve felt VERY comfortable acting the way they did in front of the cameras. They must’ve assumed that the British media would ignore their behavior, and for the most part they were right. But all the international media call outs and a few pointed British pieces like this one show that they overestimated their protection from bad press.

      • Harper says:

        Exactly! Imagine, a whole article roasting Kate, triggered only by her facial expressions and rudeness. Has it happened before, I’m wondering? No wonder she thought she’d get away with it.

    • Ashley says:

      Thé Brits have basically vilified them so I’m sure Waity and Wills thought they would get praise by snubbing them. Never believe your own good press. It doesn’t last long.

  30. MeghanNotMarkle says:

    It was a difficult read, yes, but totally worth it. Good on this woman for calling out Keen Kate for her abhorrent behavior. But let’s make sure William gets grilled, too. They’re a team of petty, jealous folks.

  31. Jaded says:

    I’ve read a few other articles of late that show the tide is turning against the Cambridges. Although not as pointed as this one, the shade is there. Wm and Catty miscalculated the situation by a country mile. Why has the Queen invited the Sussexes to Balmoral this summer? I think she’s interested in discussing the roles Harry and Meghan want to create in a more positive light where the rest of that friggin’ nest of vipers aren’t around to throw their toys and sulk. I also think she’s embarrassed by the Cambridges’ and Sophie’s inexcusable behaviour because it made HER look bad. Time to open your eyes Your Majesty and see what a truly deplorable family you have.

    • Scollins says:

      Deplorable family is probably Petty Betty’s norm. At this time in her life I believe the depth of her love would fill a belly button.

    • Nic919 says:

      William’s dumb Coronavirus joke is going to get replayed too as the bodies of the victims pile up.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        That stupid joke even made it into Danish news.

        BTW, Queen Margrethe II addressed the nation tonight, which is pretty unprecedented. She usually only address the nation on New Year’s Eve.

  32. February Pisces says:

    I think the Cambridge’s showed their petty asses so boldly because they know their paid for royal sources will write whatever they want them to write, so it doesn’t matter what their actual actions are. The Cambridge’s rudeness was a sign of their over cocky-ness because they think they are untouchable. I’m glad they are being called out for it by the guardian. I know it sounds petty but I can’t wait for the real royal war to begin… Cambridge vs Cambridge.

  33. Suze says:

    I am so glad you posted this! That article had me HOWLING and I totally agree – Kate can smile at tyrants, but can’t muster a pleasant expression for her in-laws? I wonder if the Cambridges realize that the tide is going to turn on them now that the Sussexes aren’t around for the press to spew their bile at. I would never want anyone subjected to the level of hate Meghan got, but maybe a few negative articles might get W&K to realize what they’ve done to themselves.

  34. Alexandria says:

    Yea what exact crime have Harry and Meghan done eh? Anyone?

    I have no sympathy for Duchess Dolittle. Used to think she had no brains to think for herself but now I have no doubt that she has always been calculative, immature and fake. Good riddance, go get your crown. These two jerks deserve each other.

  35. Cg2495 says:

    That article was simply delicious! She simply was spot on and pretty accurate.

  36. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    But you know what? None of this matters. There is no requirement that the future king and his wife be “good” people. Or “intelligent” people. Or “hard working” people. Or “compassionate” people. The ONLY THING William has to be is Charles’ first born son. Which he is. That’s what having a monarchy means. There are no other qualifications. Which is why monarchies are (1) stupid; and (2) obsolete. If Britain still wants a monarchy for some unfathomable reason, this is the price they pay.

    • Roo says:

      True, but they do depend upon and need the goodwill and support of the people. They somewhat justify or offset their lavish lives by supporting charities and going to ribbon-cuttings. If they are not loved and supported by us regular folk, their names bring nothing to the table.

  37. Universe says:

    Karma will come for everyone.

    I for one can’t wait for piss Morgan to get his own. He was the main instigator in the whole let’s hate meg campaign.

    Popcorn ready and waiting.

    • ➕💯 Universe. Hopefully the Levinson 2 phone hacking class action suit that Harry has joined will — at last — give Piers Morgan at least a serious taste of the karma due him.

  38. Alibeebee says:

    I also think that William is also
    Envious of Harry. Harry chose well when it came to Meghan. Be chose a strong, smart, loving, and capable woman. Someone who has his back and will encourage him to be himself and live how he feels he must . What has William chosen a vapid creature that couldn’t even keep her own accent !! That hasn’t any skills to speak of, nor deep and meaningful friendships from before she became the lap dog of William. William is jealous of Harry as well. William is just as empty as Kate is .. he could never have one the heart of a true woman of substance.

    • Züri says:

      That is a spot on assessment!

    • BabsORIG says:

      But there’s no evidence that William wants a woman better than Kate Middleton. So the notion that William is jealous of Harry because he picked a much better wife are do off the mark to me at least. I believe William’s jealousy stems from the fact that hard as he has tried, as much and as often as he has reminded his brother that he William will be king, as much as they tried to paint Harry as the stupid one, the wayward one, the good for nothing one, still Harry has continued to overshadow Willileaks in EVERY. SINGLE. WAY. I think Harry marrying Meghan, a woman who is her own woman, a woman who refused to be bent and shaped in what Kate has been shaped into, is just a cherry on the top. Willileaks can write all the articles he wants about how Harry can’t handle living in William shadow or being the spare blah blah blah. The facts speak for themselves, even though Willileaks is the FFK, he has always lived, still lives and has failed to escape his younger brother’s shadow.

      • Nic919 says:

        I think some of the jealousy relates to the fact that William settled and took the girl who was just there and not the ones he wanted but who rejected him. He would probably want to be married to the girl he fell for as opposed to the one who finally agreed.
        I’m sure seeing how much Harry is into Meghan and respects her bothers him, because he clearly has never respected Kate.

      • alibeebee says:

        I think so .. he tried to date other women .. and Kate hung about..
        William is def jealous of Harry. Williams wandering peen is proof of that..
        there’s something i’m picking up on it

    • A says:

      I don’t think William is jealous of Harry because of who he chose as a spouse. I think William is jealous of Harry in general. Harry is more popular than he is and always has been. William, who has been raised in the Windsor tradition that mandates that the heirs have to be the top priority and all attention and adulation must be focused on them even if it comes at the expense of everyone else, can’t abide by what he sees as a theft of the popularity that should be his. So it was with Charles, so it was with the Queen. The Queen always was jealous of Margaret in some sense, and both Charles and the Queen disliked how much attention was focused on Diana, an outsider. All these decades later and they still haven’t managed to figure out that this how the press and the public works.

      • BabsORIG says:

        Exactly @A. William couldn’t have given any f@cks if Meghan wrote and walked on water, as long as he outshone them both he would have been okay. Sophie is better looking than Kate, she is smarter than Kate, Sophie can give speeches off the cuff and she speaks very eloquently, but William is not threatened by the Wessexes because he outshines them in every way. Willileaks just resents the fact that Harry is more popular, Harry is smarter, Harry has the better looks comparing the two, Harry has lots of achievements under his belt, Harry served 2 tours in Afghanistan, Harry has it all, the “IT”, the charisma, the balls to stand up for himself, Harry is more accomplished in more ways than one, and to top it off, he married the woman of his dreams, an accomplished, educated woman that takes no nonsense. William the FFK OTOH has absolutely nothing to show for all his life. Harry marrying Meghan is just another reason for William to be jealous and to hate on Harry, but it and in itself is NOT the sole reason.

  39. Seraphina says:

    Wow. What a delicious read. Wow wow wow. I bow down to her. What a writer. And the last Sentence made my jaw slightly drop:
    That their proximity was enough, however, to make at least two royal masks slip, perhaps exposes the misery, as well as the cultivated pettiness, of those left behind in captivity.

    I wonder with Andrew’s girls are sitting back with a cat ate the canary grin. They too got the mean girl treatment.

  40. Roslyn says:

    I loved this Guardian article! I enjoyed the whole thing but this bit from the first paragraph particularly struck a chord: “All Meghan Markle appears to have done to deserve a comparable level of visible ostracism from Kate and William is to conclude – admittedly rather late, and with scant notice – that a lifetime dedicated to trailing mutely in their wake would be unbearable.” That is indeed what William & Kate expect, and I am sure they are majorly pissed off that H&M have said no to that proposition and actually thought for themselves and chose to leave the royal bubble. That has to be unsettling and also threatening to those who chose to remain within the bubble, because it highlights the artificiality of their existence and the fact that not everyone envies them and thinks they are as special as they think they are. All they really are is entertainers. The real business of running the country is done by the people elected to do it; all the royals are is well paid actors, playing a role. And they are not programmed to accept that one of their own and his wife – a real actor – might not want to play the supporting role for the rest of their life, especially not if they are going to be treated with disdain while doing it. Great stuff!

  41. Sass says:

    This piece was powerful. Beautifully written, very strong. I have a proud.

  42. Robert says:

    Kate is proving to be as low as her waist.

  43. A says:

    This Guardian article + the one in the Cut were both some of the most satisfying articles I had ever read about Kate and the RF. Sincerely. It is just so damn nice to see people finally catching on to the small-minded pettiness displayed by Kate and William and the RF, especially towards Meghan. Finally.

    And the reason it’s so satisfying is because I’ve always felt, in some sense, that the W&K naysayers were really just looked down on for being crazy haters, or at least being too obsessed with disliking Kate. And I feel that was valid, to an extent, but I also think that a lot of the extreme nitpickiness was brought on by the fact that plenty of people had an inkling about Kate and William from the very beginning. That they weren’t quite as nice and wholesome as they demonstrate themselves to be. But anyone who’s bothered looking into the issue with a little depth would see that William is incredibly immature and rude to people he feels don’t defer to him adequately. But the people who do look into it with any depth are also called whacko because we care too much about the royals. Welp, no one hides their meanness for long, and sooner or later, it was bound to come out into the open. And here it has. I’m not gonna lie and act like I don’t feel vindicated. I do. And I’m glad for it.

  44. Awkward symphony says:

    Outch that gotta burn😎
    This is only the beginning. I look forward to the future reporting from world media exposing this petty jealous couple for who they really are.

  45. Kat says:

    Awieeeeee, this article nailed it.

    Kate showed her true color for the world to see. Being rude inside of a church during a service of all places, ???????

  46. Well-Wisher says:

    The Cambridges masks were slipping and finally fell. No amount of gaslighting can make one unsee that brief moment.

    But it has to be galling to see someone walk away from the life she(Katherine) aspired to. The Duchess of Sussex refused to sit at the metaphoric table without a voice. She does not want to be a token, neither does she want to play upstairs/downstairs.

    Who needs protocols when one has excellent manners?

  47. CrystalBall says:

    It is my sincere wish that the whole world shall awaken and observe the mean, scheming, petty, jealous, and downright vicious nature of Catherine and William Cambridge. Their competitiveness has become a mental disorder. It would be no surprise to discover a portrait of the nasty pair, hidden in a palace attic, gradually cracking to reveal their hatefulness, just as Dorian Gray’s true nature was unveiled.