Sarah Pidgeon wore Chanel for the ‘Love Story: JFK Jr & Carolyn Bessette’ premiere

Earlier this week, FX/Hulu released the first trailer for Ryan Murphy’s long-gestating project on John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette. I thought the trailer was interesting, and I admit, I’m going to watch this (at least the first few episodes, before the quality falls off a cliff). This was originally called “American Love Story,” but now it’s called Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette. Paul Anthony Kelly plays John and Sarah Pidgeon plays Carolyn. Naomi Watts plays Jackie Kennedy, and Grace Gummer plays Caroline Kennedy. I just saw that the series will include Michael Bergin, who was Carolyn’s on-and-off lover/ex/friend. Bergin is played by Noah Fernley.

Anyway, they had the big premiere event last night in New York. While I think the “dressing up in character or on-theme for the promotional tour” bit is tired, I would have welcomed it for this series. It’s jarring to see Sarah Pidgeon promote a project where she’s playing one of THE style icons of the 1990s and Pidgeon just looks so… unlike Bessette. Carolyn would have hated this dress/ensemble, that’s all I’m saying. Sarah wore fresh-off-the-runway Chanel, part of Matthieu Blazy’s debut with Chanel. Technically, it’s a giant “waistcoat” with feathers, all over a pair of trousers. Meh. Naomi Watts wore Balenciaga.

Sarah also spoke to Vogue ahead of the premiere, as she was selecting her Chanel ensemble. She spoke a lot about how Ryan Murphy’s team was able to pull a lot of vintage ‘90s looks to recreate Bessette’s closet – they got access to a lot of Yohji Yamamoto, Prada, Hermès, Valentino, etc. They also tailored Levi’s jeans to look like specific pairs owned by Carolyn.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

17 Responses to “Sarah Pidgeon wore Chanel for the ‘Love Story: JFK Jr & Carolyn Bessette’ premiere”

  1. Heylee says:

    Sarah’s outfit looks like a little girl got into her mom’s closet and blindly chose the dress that looked the most fancy. Oof.

  2. Normades says:

    There have been some really beautiful slip dresses featured on the recent runways which would have hit that 90s vibe. Seems like a missed opportunity

  3. ThatGirlThere says:

    I just hope they don’t trash Carolyn in this series. She was relentlessly harassed when she alive and slandered after death.

    Paul, the actor who plays John is handsome really handsome.

    Chanel designs have been ugly for years and I don’t understand the draw other than the name. Even then Coco Chanel was a Nazi sympathizer.

    • Lau says:

      Honestly I’m not trusting Murphy at all not to end up trashing Bessette. I still don’t understand how he has never been sued by family of real life people in his “Monster” shows.

    • Lady Rae says:

      I think that is the draw it’s Chanel. It’ll be hard to turn it down and say no to wearing it to a Premier. I don’t know how easy it is to get to wear Chanel.

  4. Kathgal says:

    All the pictures I have seen of the Paul playing JFK Jr. reminds me of Andrew Shue. Is it just me?

  5. Is there something wrong with my eyes… or my memory… because NEITHER of them look ANYTHING like the people they are portraying! It’s infuriating. I feel like Elaine Benes when she screams, “I HATE IT!” during The English Patient.

    • Thinking says:

      I don’t think they look like them either.

      JFK Jr and CBK were kind of larger-than-life looking whereas the actors, while attractive, look more like normal people. I don’t think I’d feel intimidated around the actors.

      • Yes – great point. They just look like everyday people who are not very memorable.

      • og bella says:

        Yeah, but…that’s part of what made them special; a charism, an X-factor, that cannot be duplicated.

      • Thinking says:

        The missing X-factor is the problem, I agree.

        The fact that I wouldn’t be intimidated around the actors but might go silent around the real couple is a criticism of the casting. I’m not praising the actors, but kind of dissing them (it’s not their fault they were cast though).

        I’m trying to think whether more famous actors would work better in these roles, but even famous actors don’t have that untouchable quality JFK Jr. had. I can’t really decide on the unnamed quality or essence he had, which is a bit strange since it wasn’t like he was prodigiously skilled at anything except being good-looking and glamorous. (I’d say he was well-spoken but most upper middle class people are. He also has history behind him, but so do the rest of the Kennedys). But that one indefinable thing in terms of how he looked and came across publicly is what he was better at than everyone else, and I’d extend the same perception to CBK. They remind you of a time when some people were kind of aspirational to the masses without trying so hard and influencers would fail next to them.

      • og bella says:

        Yes! I’m sitting here trying hard to think of someone else with that X-factor to the level of JFK jr. but I can’t.

        They say Clinton in his hey day, but I don’t think that even he touches the level of JFK jr. To me, Clinton has always been a little smarmy and too slick.

        Maybe because we (general we) embraced him and wanted to protect him since he was a little boy, saluting his father’s coffin?

  6. alexc says:

    Naomi looks amazing.

  7. Kirsten says:

    That Chanel dress is just tragic. Naomi Watts, on the other hand, looks AMAZING. That dress is perfection and she looks gorgeous.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment