Angelina Jolie called out Brad Pitt & his ‘ten lawyers’ in their latest legal tangle

A few weeks ago, there was a curious story on TMZ, all about the lawsuit and countersuit between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. He sued her over her lawful sale of her half of Chateau Miraval, and she countersued him for being a jackass. For four years, this situation has been meandering its way through the American courts, although from what I hear, Pitt has his hands full with various legal issues in European courts as well. Anyway, the TMZ story a few weeks ago was about Angelina supposedly asking for a trial delay of just a few months, moving the trial from April 2027 to September 2027. Pitt allegedly threw a fit and argued that they need to get this settled as soon as possible (again, he sued her… four years ago) because he wants to be able to live in Miraval in peace. Angelina isn’t stopping him from staying at Miraval. In fact, she and the kids haven’t been in Miraval in ten years. Well, Jolie and Pitt’s lawyers are still bickering about all of that and more. Wait for the funniest sidenote from Jolie’s brief at the end of this story:

Angelina Jolie doesn’t seem to be fazed by her ex-husband Brad Pitt’s complaints in court about not being able to enjoy his $164 million French estate … TMZ has learned.

According to court docs, obtained by TMZ, Angelina and Brad lay out their positions on when the trial should actually go down, with Angelina claiming there is no reason to move forward with Brad’s desire to have the trial in April 2027.

The legal battle started in 2022 when Brad sued Angelina, claiming she sold her stake in their Chateau Miraval to a third party without his approval. He said the new owner was hostile and causing issues with the wine business, which he spent years building. Angelina said she needed to move forward with the transaction and didn’t need Brad’s approval to sell her interest.

In his recent docs, the “World War Z” star argued the trial should happen sooner rather than later. He said he has been unable to spend time at the estate, and he’s been deprived of “the quiet enjoyment of his home in France.”

Brad also claimed that witnesses are getting older, and one even died. He pointed out that another one of Angelina’s lawyers passed the bar in 1972.

Angelina says a short extension of the trial date to September 2027 is more than reasonable, insisting that Brad has presented no evidence to prove his claims his time at Miraval has been interrupted or ruined by the litigation.

She also called out Brad’s claim that a trial later in the year would be interrupted by the Jewish High Holidays. Angelina said Brad didn’t name any of his 10 lawyers who would be impacted.

A judge has yet to weigh in on the disagreement over the trial date.

[From TMZ]

“She also called out Brad’s claim that a trial later in the year would be interrupted by the Jewish High Holidays. Angelina said Brad didn’t name any of his 10 lawyers who would be impacted.” Dude is paying TEN lawyers to come up with “but a September trial might ruin Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur” and Angelina is like “who does that affect again??” And of course Angelina is unfazed by Pitt’s “but I don’t want to be bothered by mean wine people at Miraval” argument. God, Pitt is such a huge f–king baby.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

27 Responses to “Angelina Jolie called out Brad Pitt & his ‘ten lawyers’ in their latest legal tangle”

  1. Jais says:

    So the delay would mean the trial would still be happening in 2027. Oh well.

    • Facts says:

      Actually TMZ lied. It was set for August and she wanted it delayed til November. Two months didn’t fit the narrative his PR team is trying to smear.

      • jais says:

        Interesting. August is when kids start gearing up to go back to school so I could see asking for a delay. No idea if that was the reason.

      • LOL says:

        Yes once again Epstein protectors TMZ have lied it never was April as they reported , It was set for August and she wanted it delayed till September,
        only 1 months different, once again it didn’t fit deadbeat Pitt’s narrative , thats why his PR team is continuing to spread deformatory smear campaigns against Angelina and making himself as her victim .

        People keep forgetting it is Pitt whose suing Angelina and it ys Pitt whose delayed the case with changes 3 times , and now he’s having meltdowns

  2. 1stTimer says:

    Choose the bear. Always.

    • Bqm says:

      When that was viral I asked my hubby the question. He immediately said “duh, the bear”. 😆 That’s why we’ve been married 35 years.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    Brad can’t complain about this case being delayed when he was the one who decided to sue Angelina in the first place. He can always drop the lawsuit if he wants it to be over.

  4. Gloriana says:

    There’s been a reckoning lately about toxic behaviors and the curtain is lifting. Brad Pitt is one of those being exposed and no one deserves it more. He can’t let go and live his life, he has to punish Angelina for leaving.

  5. Clove says:

    He is getting what he deserves because this could have been over a long time, but no, he intends to punish her!

    She is kicking his a$$, and I am here for it! He has ten lawyers? His furry has no expense.

  6. FIFI says:

    Ofc she’s unfazed. He is the one who initiated conversations about the delay! She officially won her appeal AND the judge finally vacted the previous order and denied his motion for her communications. He’s now scrambling for other evidence. He’s pathetic and its telling no one still has picked up her winning the appeal.

    • Facts says:

      Ofc they haven’t. One she doesn’t send releases to mags like he does. I wish she would start

    • LOL says:

      Angers me how biased media is when it comes to protecting Pitt’s losses, they never reported Angelina won her appeals against Pitt, never , instead making Pitt look like a victim because he pays them in exchange access to him & his projects whilst defaming victims of his domestic violence

  7. jais says:

    So he is not allowed access to her emails then? the ones he had been asking for?

    • FIFI says:

      That is correct Jais. He can only get them if she somehow broke that attorney-client privilege. She didn’t so it was denied for all messages.

  8. LOL says:

    My heart goes out to Angelina Jolie and her children through have to continue face Their domestic abuser perpetrator Brad Pitt’s warth via litigation abuse, and abuse via toxic media outlets as TMZ , Daily Fail, trying to mislead the public with malicious smear campaigns, hiding the truth that its Pitt whose suing & delaying and lying about not being able to use his winery home, when in reality he’s been using the winery home for last 10 years and nobody’s stopped him. Instead he’s the one that’s not allowed the new co-owners to use the home they own with him.. he’s such a repulsive human being. Still doing post separation abuse against Angelina Jolie and his own six children

  9. LOL says:

    @JAIS No he got what he could rest judge denied access as those communications were between lawyer client, yet Pitt hasn’t handed over the communications of him & his corrupt PR & buisness managers that show how complicit they were in covering up pitts bad buisness practices and being complicit in his domestic violence case getting his charges dropped

    • FIFI says:

      He didn’t get any of them. Angelina appealed the order on ground that they were protected under attorney-client privilege. She won her appeal and the order was vacated. He was given a final chance to show she broke that prillvege but wasnt able to so a new order was entered that his motion to compel was denied. This was the tentative that later filed as final order

      https://x.com/HollyRuston/status/2046412274592567462?t=VPZ_ScdNDT0qOdSFpT1xmQ&s=19

      • LOL says:

        @FIFI, thanks for correction & receipts. I hadn’t realised Angelina was successful the way her abuser still keeps burying her successes , instead he keeps spreading the toxic narratives. We know practically all the main stream media is corrupt & carry on protecting abusive men in power especially men protected by Harvey Weinstein, Johhny Depp, Jeffrey Epstein PR .

  10. etso says:

    ‘the “World War Z” star’. . .

    *snicker* snort*

  11. Beverley says:

    *sigh* Brad Pitt used to make my heart flutter. Now he gives mean-spirited, small d*ck energy and he’s sooo unattractive. What he did to his family on that plane was unconscionable and I’m not surprised Angelina noped out.

    • Agreatreckoning says:

      Once upon a time in Hollywood, Brad Pitt was interesting to me. Now he’s just an a$$hole. The plane situation turned him into Sh*t Pitt. Though he most likely was a sh*t before.imo

      Team Angelina.

    • anon says:

      When he was younger, and you could still look at him without gagging, a lot of red flags were simply ignored. Because he was handsome. Now that he looks the way he does (and all those procedures don’t seem to improve his looks at all), many women have started to look at him a bit differently and are just now starting to notice that he’s not only not very bright but also not a good person. We tend to whitewash celebrities we find attractive, even when they turn out to be abusive. Sad…

  12. BRi says:

    I had men who keep stalking their victims and use tactics of litigation abuse as punishment towards their victims

  13. West Villager says:

    I also noticed that the tabloid referenced here is TMZ and this clearly was sourced from Angelina Jolie. It has also been discussed extensively here previously that TMZ was a Pitt-go-to place when he wanted to attack Angelina. So it is kinda funny that she flipped the game here and went to his backyard, so to speak.

  14. Leny says:

    Pretty sure Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are in October in 2027. Like, are his lawyers going to need a night off for Leil Selichot?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment