Next year, the ten-year renovation project on Buckingham Palace will finally be completed. If British contractors are anything like American contractors, the palace might not be move-in ready until 2030 though. But sure, for argument’s sake, let’s say that the £369 million renovation job will be completed next year. We’ve known for years that King Charles has no intention of moving into BP when the reno is completed. He and Camilla are happy at Clarence House and their plan was always to stay there and “use” BP as an office, for events and meetings. When the Prince and Princess of Wales moved into Forest Lodge last year, we also heard that they have zero inclination to move into BP when Scooter King is on the throne as well. So, a massively costly renovation for a palace where no king or queen will ever be in residence again. This is the story behind Richard Eden’s Mail column this week.
[Queen Elizabeth’s] move to Windsor coincided with an extensive renovation programme at Buckingham Palace, which began in 2017. The Government allocated a staggering £369million of taxpayers’ money for the scheme. At the time, royal aides rejected claims that Prince Charles intended to use it as a sort of ‘monarchy HQ’ rather than his residence, Clarence House, when he eventually became king. ‘Buckingham Palace will remain the official residence of the monarch,’ said a statement from Clarence House.
Since King Charles ascended the throne in 2022, he and Queen Camilla have, however, stayed at Clarence House, which he inherited from his beloved grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, after her death two decades earlier. Unlike Winston Churchill, no prime minister has told the King to move to Buckingham Palace. And this has left some prominent royalists disappointed.
As I reported in my social diary column, Eden Confidential, in the Daily Mail today, interior designer Nicky Haslam, an old friend of Queen Camilla, warned that it would be a grave mistake for her and the King not to live at the palace.
‘Turning Buckingham Palace into an office is wrong. Period,’ said the Old Etonian, 86, whose mother, Diamond Ponsonby, was one of Queen Victoria’s goddaughters. ‘William won’t use it either. It stops Buckingham Palace being the jewel in the crown.’ Haslam believes that the palace would lose its appeal to tourists if it was no longer a royal residence. ‘If people think it’s an office they won’t go there,’ he said.
I have noticed myself that stately homes still used by their titled owners seem to be more attractive to visitors. Part of the appeal of Chatsworth in Derbyshire, for example, is that the Duke of Devonshire’s family live there. When I visited Arundel Castle, in West Sussex, recently, there were new photographs of the Duke of Norfolk and his family on display in the rooms open to the public, which added to its charms.
It’s easy to see why the King and Queen prefer Clarence House, an elegant family home, to the vast Buckingham Palace with its 775 rooms. Yet it’s their duty to move out.
I hear whispers, however, that Their Majesties will never live at the palace. ‘Buckingham Palace will be used for royal events,’ a source tells me. ‘There will be investitures, receptions and banquets, but the King and Queen won’t sleep there.’
This leaves me worried for the future of the monarchy. The King’s grandfather, George VI, and his wife, Queen Elizabeth, defied Adolf Hitler and remained at Buckingham Palace throughout the war, even during the nine occasions when German bombs fell on it. Churchill knew the symbolic power of the King being at the nation’s home. That is why the Government agreed to spend £369 million of taxpayers’ money on restoring the palace to its former glory. For King Charles to abandon it at a time of peace would be a serious mistake.
The larger problem is that the monarchy is in their “who gonna check me, boo” era. While the Windsors are facing a steep decline in popularity and relevancy, they have never been more well-funded and coddled by medieval bureaucracy. Prince Andrew is likely going to skate by with little more than a slap on the wrist (if that). Prince Edward and Sophie will continue to live in their huge mansion and siphon money from the taxpayers. Charles will continue to travel among his eleventy billion homes, castles, palaces and estates. William will continue to hide out at Forest Lodge and Norfolk, doing f–k all. There’s not even a real public pressure campaign to “force” these people to “live in a palace.”
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.
- Queen Camilla and King Charles III depart State Opening of Parliament, The Victoria Tower, Sovereigns Entrance, Palace of Westminster, London, UK – 13 May 2026,Image: 1098544071, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no , Credit line: Victoria Jones/Shutterstock/Avalon
- Britain’s King Charles and Queen Camilla arrive for the State Opening of Parliament, at the Houses of Parliament, in London, Britain, May 13, 2026.,Image: 1098546605, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no , Credit line: Suzanne Plunkett/Avalon
- King Charles III and Queen Camilla walk through Royal Gallery for the State Opening of Parliament at Houses Of Parliament, London, England, UK on Wednesday 13 May, 2026.,Image: 1098555181, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: Please credit photographer and agency when publishing as Justin Ng/UPPA/Avalon., Model Release: no , Credit line: Justin Ng/Avalon
- Britain’s King Charles III speaks as he sits besides Queen Camilla during the State Opening of Parliament at the Palace of Westminster in London, Wednesday, May 13, 2026.(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, Pool),Image: 1098558590, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: WPA POOL PHOTO, *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no , Credit line: Kirsty Wigglesworth/Avalon
- Britain’s King Charles III and Queen Camilla leave after the State Opening of Parliament at the Palace of Westminster in London, Wednesday, May 13, 2026.(AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, Pool),Image: 1098558609, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: WPA POOL PHOTO, *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no , Credit line: Kirsty Wigglesworth/Avalon
- LONDON, ENGLAND – MAY 13: King Charles III ahead of delivering the King’s Speech in the House of Lord’s Chamber during the State Opening of Parliament on May 13, 2026 in London, England. The State Opening of Parliament follows the prorogation of the previous session on 29 April. King Charles III will deliver the King’s Speech outlining the government’s legislative agenda for the 2026–27 session. Key priorities for the year include constitutional reforms regarding disgraced peers, a 10-year Health Plan for the NHS, and the implementation of changes to the Universal Credit two-child limit.,Image: 1098588129, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no , Credit line: Chris Jackson/Avalon
- Members of the British royal family during a reception at Buckingham Palace in London, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II’s birth Featuring: (Left to right) The Duchess of Gloucester, the Duke of Gloucester, the Duke of Kent, the Princess of Wales, the Prince of Wales, King Charles III, Queen Camilla, the Princess Royal, the Duke of Edinburgh, Princess Alexandra and the Duchess of Edinburgh at Buckingham Palace in London, to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth II’s birth Where: London, United Kingdom When: 21 Apr 2026 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- (Left to right) the Duchess of Edinburgh, Princess of Wales, Prince of Wales and Duke of Edinburgh during a Royal Garden Party at Buckingham Palace, London, to celebrate frontline workers from across the United Kingdom and recognise the dedication and contribution of those who serve their communities through volunteering, supporting charitable causes and working for emergency services Featuring: Sophie Duchess of Edinburgh, Prince William, Catherine Princess of Wales, Edward Duke of Edinburgh Where: London, United Kingdom When: 08 May 2026 Credit: PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**
- The Prince and Princess of Wales during a Royal Garden Party at Buckingham Palace, London, to celebrate frontline workers from across the United Kingdom and recognise the dedication and contribution of those who serve their communities through volunteering, supporting charitable causes and working for emergency services Featuring: Prince William, Catherine Princess of Wales Where: London, United Kingdom When: 08 May 2026 Credit: Aaron Chown/PA Images/INSTARimages **NORTH AMERICA RIGHTS ONLY**






















I don’t think anyone who visits Buckingham Palace cares if anyone actually lives there. Let it be a Palace-Museum-Ceremonial building. Honestly, this whole argument just feeds into the lie that somehow the monarchy is needed for “tourism”.
Except if that is the case why is the huge renovation making so much private space for homes for the royals? That is my tax payer £ and if the whole building is going to be a museum then spend the money accordingly. Will State banquets be held there still? If Windsor works, why not stick with Windsor and save on all the kitchens needed, just as an example. Bathrooms – ( as in what we English call a bathroom not a loo) – won’t be needed if no one is living there. The expense is enormous and made worse if the space is not going to be used in the way the work is assuming. Personally I think it should be all public spaces – the State rooms etc open to the public, but so much more use could be made of all the other space. They family have lots of other more sensible options for actual living.
They should open up BP to the public completely then. The building should pay for itself, right?
Well let’s make it a hotel then, I wanna sleep there if i’m travelling in London!!!
Part museum, exhibition, part hotel…
It’s great actually. They can open more of BP, have more and larger exhibits, and open all areas year round rather than part open just in the summer. That raises a lot of money. Tons of people visit Hampton court without royals living there. And visit palaces in Russia, France and Germany where they haven’t lived for a century or more. Eden’s an idiot. It’s not like people visit Windsor or Kensington thinking they’ll bump into a royal. We see public areas not family ones as well.
Yeah, the comparison to great country estates doesnt fly – I think people ARE more likely to visit Chatsworth or Arundel or Althorp or Alnwick etc if they have any idea of the family that is connected to the house. there are just too many of those houses in the UK; if you’re picking a few to visit, you’re going to go to one that you have heard of for whatever reason.
Buckingham Palace people have heard of, lol. Open it up year round, open more rooms, have more exhibits, etc. the royal family can still use it for their balcony moments and big events.
The most obvious reason not to do this is cost – with the royal family scattered in various houses, the upkeep and security costs are increased. but that’s sort of inevitable. Even if C&C moved to BP I’m assuming another royal would use Clarence house.
The tourists will visit it *more* because you’re literally only allowed to tourize the place when the monarch is not in residence.
I mean seriously, does he think that all the people going to Versailles are bummed out because the king doesn’t sleep there?
PC looks like he’s playing dress-up on the throne.
Charles rightfully should be a natural here, this is totally in his wheelhouse: curating exhibits & concerts, book fairs, interfaith summits on current events for dialogue, & engagement, opera, open air performances of Shakespeare, garden parties, poetry readings…. Symposia on philosophical questions, he could do so much with that space. Go crazy! You’re halfway there. JK.
Buckingham Palace has had a bad rodent problem since the 1800s. I wonder if they’ve conquered that or if the old foundation can never be truly sealed up. Trump said he’s always wanted to live there, he’d fit right in. 🐀