Who will be cast in the movie about the Massachusetts lesbian-masking debacle?

Even though the subject matter is difficult, Spotlight has become one of the best films and most-rewatchable films of the past 20 years (in my opinion). Spotlight is about the Boston Globe team who uncovered the Catholic Church’s decades of sex abuse and cover-ups. The cast is great: Rachel McAdams, Mark Ruffalo, John Slattery, Michael Keaton, Liev Schreiber and on and on. The screenplay is amazing, and it’s just a really well-done film. A very deserving Best Picture Oscar-winner. Well, the Boston Globe uncovered a new scandal this month, and it’s possible that the Globe’s coverage might end up getting adapted for the screen. The scandal? A western-Massachusetts lesbian bar tried to drop their masking police and all hell broke loose. The debacle which has become one of the funniest viral stories in years. I covered it last week. Well, according to the Hollywood Reporter, a Spotlight-esque film or documentary might be in the works about it.

In the early 2000s, The Boston Globe published a series of bombshell articles that exposed the cover-up of abuse within the Catholic Archdiocese of Boston. The series was one of the more consequential pieces of journalism this century, winning a Pulitzer Prize and inspiring Spotlight, the 2015 film that won a best picture Oscar.

Now, a very different Boston Globe piece has captured the zeitgeist — and Hollywood’s attention. The article in question is titled “A Western Mass. lesbian bar required KN-95 masks. When it changed the rules, all hell broke loose.”

The Sept. 22 article by Annalisa Quinn was all over social media feeds this week and quickly became one of the most read stories in Globe history.

Now, insiders tell THR that UTA, which represents the Globe, has been fielding inquiries about potential adaptations for the article — both in the scripted space and the documentary sphere. Indeed, the article has several ready-made characters, from a besieged bar owner drowning in debt to former patrons furious that the bar has killed its mask policy — and who go above and beyond to let the owner know what they think.

Articles are optioned all the time, of course, but only a select few make it to the screen, such as this weekend’s Robert Pattinson movie Primetime, which was based on a 2007 Esquire article. As sources involved in newspaper packages note, anything that gives your project a competitive edge is needed in this tough media landscape. “Everyone is scared, and nobody wants to make a decision,” notes one observer in this space. A project based on an article like this one? That could at least give a decision-maker the feeling they’ve got a safer bet.

As for the Globe, a spokesperson tells THR, “This story has certainly resonated with a wide range of audiences nationally and internationally. It is now one of the most-read stories we’ve published, and has already garnered many thousands of subscriptions.”

[From THR]

I hope Hollywood turns this into a feature film, quite honestly. I feel like Emma Stone should come on board right away as a star and producer – she has just the vibe needed to get this greenlit, and she would instinctively know the correct tone. That’s where they need to go – take the film seriously, but do it as a high parody, with ultra-left-wing lesbian political gatekeeping as the villain. Regina Hall, perhaps? As the woman who called the therapist a cop. Julianne Moore, 100%. Mikey Madison, obviously, probably as the Boston Globe reporter. Jennifer Lawrence would be awesome too. God, it could be so much fun.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Antoni Shkraba, Ketut Subiyanto and Polina Tankilevitch on Pexels.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

17 Responses to “Who will be cast in the movie about the Massachusetts lesbian-masking debacle?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. MaisiesMom says:

    I saw some TikTok guy fan-casting this. He said they would want “Lesbian Excellence” so included Sarah Paulson, Kate McKinnon and Kristen Stewart. It was very funny. I would watch this movie.

    Also loved “Spotlight.” Such great, Old School solid film-making about Old School investigative journalism.

  2. Who were these people says:

    This exaggerated tempest in a teapot has nothing to do with actual crime or cover up, is not another “Spotlight,” and reflects a mean streak in current society. If this weren’t a bar catering to women, and lesbian women at that, would the story have been perceived as so amusing or attention-getting? What makes the punchline here, and why? If it didn’t depict people seeking safer socialization somehow as infighting freaks would this get sympathy instead of scorn? And how about covering the true criminal freakishness of the far-right anti-vaccine, anti- masking, pro-disease, truly hateful people who are actually tearing this country apart? PS Apparently there are questions about the accuracy of the original story but congrats, Boston Globe, you got attention.

  3. Eurydice says:

    I’m not sure what the plotline would be if this were a feature film, but it might be an interesting study of human nature for a documentary. I see this kind of thing a lot in Boston, where the virtue signaling becomes more important than the underlying intent – people advocating kindness end up being unkind. The thing is that every community has its insiders and outsiders, even if the community was originally formed to be inclusive. And every community has bullies who weaponize the language and culture to get their own way.

    • Who WERE These People? says:

      So now this is much more interesting than the “ooh, catfight!” response to the original story — which most people have not actually read, by the way, not being paid subscribers. I also wonder how much of this is specific to Boston editors believing they are casting a satiric eye toward the culture of Western Mass.

      • Eurydice says:

        The Boston Globe tends to be left-wing in a painfully earnest way and their attempts at satire usually fall flat. But they do report regularly on town meetings with the sometimes absurd arguments/debates that derail decision-making and they do publish “clickbait” type articles that guarantee engagement in the comments – this must have been the best of both worlds for them.

        For a documentary, I think the through-line would be the final quote – “That’s the price you pay for being in community.”

      • Who WERE These People? says:

        Fascinating! Thank you both.

    • YankeeDoodles says:

      This is @Eurydice, you have to plumb the finer and more profound distinctions between the culture of Boston itself (cosmopolitan, but rooted, progressive but not preachy, gritty but not callous) compared to the echoes of that culture that permeate the western reaches of Massachusetts. As someone who was born in Boston and grew up just one town to the West, whose extended family was all rooted in the western end of the state, there is a huge span between the two ends of that spectrum. It’s what Freud (IIRC) called the narcissism of minor differences. Or the anxiety of influence, credit to the same cultural commentator, Sigmund. I would attribute both neuroses to the people living at the end of the turnpike. LOL.

  4. Lightpurple says:

    As yes, Spotlight, the movie that changes what should be a 5 minute cab ride from Post Office Square to Morrissey Boulevard in Southie into an hour long odyssey through the South End and Brighton, with multiple strange loops through Downtown Crossing

  5. Kate says:

    Because what the world needs more of right now is straight people shitting on queer women! So funny! Hilarious!

    • MaisiesMom says:

      I really don’t think that is what’s at work here. I was following the story on social media and from what I could tell, people felt a lot of sympathy for the owner who was still trying to make the business work while in debt and even living out of her car for a time. She’s a queer woman. But she was being attacked by people who had been her clientele/customers for suggesting one unmasked night a week, on Saturdays. And the reason she suggested it was to make more money so she could keep the doors open for the other nights, where mask mandates would remain. I would say yes, people were making fun of what they considered excessive wokeness. But they were not making fun of queer women in general. They didn’t take issue with their sexuality, but rather with how they reacted to the proposed change and how frankly nasty they were to the owner.

  6. jferber says:

    Who Were These People? You absolutely have a point. I didn’t even think of that angle until you mentioned it. Would they still have made it if it happened in the Trump White House? Maybe Bobby Kennedy walking into a room and screaming for everybody to take off their masks (Dems and Repubs)? I can see the comic side to that (because I hate those people), but I’m definitely not with it if it’s to make fun of lesbians in particular and women in general.