Blake Lively won’t even wear pants for her Vogue cover

voguecover

Blake Lively is pantless, yet again. Or should I say ALWAYS. She and Taylor Momsen have a thing about being pantless, although Blake is a legal adult, and her constant pantlessness is about trying to be sexy, whereas Taylor’s lack of pants is about being “hardcore”. Anyway, Blake is the unexpected cover girl for the June issue of Vogue Magazine, and the photo shoot is all about Blake at the beach, in little dresses or bathing suits, as best to see her perfect figure. I know she paid for parts of body, but still – the girl is gorgeous and healthy-looking, so I’m not hating this photo shoot. Here are some highlights from the article (full piece here):

blake4

On her part in The Green Lantern: “All I want is to be a hero to my nephews and nieces. I’m going to be the coolest aunt ever. Our director likes it real—the fights close and dirty,” she explains, and for added veracity aerial stunts are being filmed in the rig created for The Matrix. “I’m 40 feet in the air, spiraling around. That’s the best workout you can ever do because it’s all core,” she tells me. “You do that for ten minutes and you should see your body the next day! It’s so exhilarating, so thrilling—and nauseating!”

On wearing a wet suit to go surfing: “Of course you have to pee in your wet suit,” she declares with startling matter-of-factness. “It will keep you warm; they all do it.”

Los Angeles v. New York v. New Orleans: “I haven’t lived in California for so long,” she says sheepishly, “but my New York guise is gone. Ostrich flats don’t really work on the beach!” New Orleans has already lulled her into its gentler pace. “I’m used to that sweet, syrupy Southern mentality,” she says. “There is so much heart. I love, love, love New York, but it’s nice sometimes to have not so much to do—there’s time to walk through the park and to cook.”

[From Vogue]

Yeah, there wasn’t much. The whole article was about Blake and the Vogue writer, Hamish Bowles take a surfing lesson from “surf deity Rob Machado”. There’s a lot of bullsh-t about surfing that I didn’t really care about, I just want Blake to talk about who she’s boning and when she got her implants. By the way, the article does mention that she’s still with Penn Badgley, so he’s sticking with her even though there are rumors about her and her Green Lantern costar Ryan Reynolds, plus those old Ben Affleck rumors. It was probably nothing.

blake3

blake2

blake1

Vogue photos courtesy of The Fashion Spot, cover courtesy of Vogue.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

43 Responses to “Blake Lively won’t even wear pants for her Vogue cover”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. lena says:

    isn’t this the girl that slept with a producer or something for her green lantern part?

  2. Amber says:

    I don’t see the problem. She’s in swimsuits and skirts. It’s not like Taylor Momsen, where she’s running around in lingerie in the middle of the afternoon.

  3. Leek says:

    Yeah, she is young and gorgeous. Let her have her barely dressed photo shoots while she can. One day she’ll get older, fall in love, get on birth control and gain 15 pounds.

  4. lucy2 says:

    I think she looks great in the photos, but seems about as deep as a kiddie pool.

    I agree with Amber, there’s a difference between an adult in a photo shoot, and a stupid 16 year old kid running around without pants in NYC.

  5. PrettyTarheelFan says:

    Lena, there was a rumor Harvey Weinstein was after her (a la the Gretchen Moll experience), but supposedly she actually managed to avoid banging him. Ever notice what she always wears on the red carpet though? (*Cough* Marchesa *Cough*).

  6. lena says:

    that’s who it was!? Harvey Weintstein…Eww just ewwwwwwwww

  7. keirelle says:

    She is not pretty. Especially in the 4th pic… she has a horse face! But I guess people don’t care about her face when she walks around in bikinis.

  8. smallwonder2738 says:

    What’s with all of these magazines featuring girls in bikini’s with a sweater!? I don’t get it. I’ve never though to pack a beach bag and think “sunscreen, check. Lip balm, check. towel, check. bathing suit, check. Wool sweater, check!” It looks ridiculous. If you’re cold or trying to cover skin, does your bottom half of your body not count? It’s even more ridiculous than the dumb ass’s who wear heels on the beach.

  9. Victoria says:

    I dont get the Marchesa thing, what does it mean that she wears that?

  10. Ruby Red Lips says:

    I didn’t realise her chest was enhanced – good surgeon!

  11. Mika says:

    I think this girl is super hot but she’s not really a “fashion” girl. Leighton Meester is a “fashion” girl… and way more talented.

  12. Grace says:

    Isn’t this photo shoot very similiar to one Miranda Kerr did for Marie Claire a few months back?

    http://www.sassisamblog.com/2009/12/10/miranda-kerr-in-us-marie-claire/

  13. Strawberry says:

    @ Victoria: Marchesa’s head designer is Georgina Chapman, who is Harvey Weinstein’s baby momma/wife. She sleeps with that, yes…

  14. Q says:

    Has she fessed to the implants? I really always thought those were real. I mean if they aren’t, I’m honestly reconsidering. She has the greatest boobs ever.

  15. Victoria says:

    @ Strawberry: I did not know that! Thank you! :)

  16. Novaraen says:

    She’s sucking it in and sticking her butt out in every shot.

    Puleeze.

  17. Ally says:

    I can’t believe Vogue actually pays someone to make their covers look that ridiculous with Photoshopping. They “cleaned up” Lively’s face so much that her hairline looks ridiculous. She’s a gorgeous girl in the prime of life, and they decide to muck about with her image until she looks unnatural and weird, almost to the point of unattractive.

    That Anna Wintour’s supposed perfectionism is degenerating into straight dementia, methinks.

  18. Iris says:

    She has the perfect body. I am in awe.

  19. Iris says:

    and comments have been exceedingly bitchy and negative lately. maybe commenters are taking a cue from the website’s name, but what’s with all the hatred?

  20. Maritimer says:

    Keirelle: If she looks like a horse. where can I get me some hay!! I want to be a horse too.
    She is drop dead gorgeous. And those tits are 100% hers – no surgery…Come on people, be nice.

  21. Carrie says:

    She’s got one hell of a body, that’s for sure!

    As for the Harvey Weinstein rumors, I thought that he was actively trying to prevent her from getting the Green Lantern part so that she would ask for his help/sleep with him, and she managed to circumvent the whole Gretchen Mol thing. Does Harvey Weinstein even have that kind of power these days? I know he did in the early/mid 1990s, but now? Isn’t Miramax pretty much dead?

  22. Q says:

    @Carrie, what is the Gretchen Mol thing?? I’ve been asleep at the wheel.

  23. FIONA says:

    This girl does not look like a horse. She is gorgeous! and aren’t horses considered to be the most beautiful animals in existence? So technically, that’s not really an insult.

  24. sally says:

    She probably got the implants when she got the nose done.

  25. Persistent Cat says:

    She has amazing legs, why should she wear pants? She’s at the beach so she’s wearing a wet suit or bikini bottoms. That seems appropriate for the setting. In other shots, she’s wearing a dress so I don’t see how that’s “pantsless.”

    I love my legs so I never wear pants (however I’m in my 30s so my skirts are longer than hers) but I wouldn’t consider myself “pantsless.”

  26. jover says:

    Agee with 17 and kierelle. In addition, fashion mags need to go back to putting fashion models on the covers with high fashion photos. That’s what they are for; not to flatter the egos of pedestrian starlets like Blake lively. Anne wintour has ruined Vogue (and American fashion) these last 10 yrs with her obsession with celebs; if I want to read People or Us I will; anyway, Blake was on Vogue awhile back and it was one of the lowest selling issues. Time was a Vogue cover was sometimes a work of art; now they’re meh. Anyway,ppl raise your standards Blake Lively is ordinary in every respect. For beauties I’ll take American model Hilary Rhoda, Dominican model Rose Cordero and Canadian model Lisa Cant. Now they deserve a Vogue cover, not Blake Lively.

  27. Cinderella says:

    Such a big deal is made out of Blake Lively, but her face isn’t all that great. Her body is, but so are the bodies of lots of girls her age. I just don’t see the “wow” factor here.

  28. Ana says:

    Her boobs like fake to me. They’re very, very perky. But what’s wrong with having fake boobs? I’d have them if I could afford them.
    She has a very amazing body.

  29. Maritza says:

    She has a girl next door look about her. She is pretty cute.

  30. Lil says:

    Well she has great leg, let her show it!

    I prefer see har body in a bikini than Gabby’s…

    Ow you women, always jealous…

  31. James says:

    Leave her alone. There’s a role called Stylist in this industry.

    This headline is way too misleading, trying to make it so personal.

  32. fugly says:

    y is her mouth gaping open in every pic? it’s not at all sexy. she looks….special.

  33. canadianchick says:

    Boobs Legsley looks good but something photochopped about her face. If I had her legs… why bother with pants?

  34. keirelle says:

    @Maritimer:

    She is just not pretty- I have neevr thought she was. Like Cinderella said above, she has the body, but so do a lot of girls her age. Fact is, she isn’t even much of an actress and bikini bodies don’t last forever…

    @Fiona: Horse face= long face, and not in the pretty way. Horses are indeed beautiful… for horses, but not when people have the face of one. What a silly comment. I have a pug and I think he is so adorable, but a person that looked like a pug would certainly not be, lmao.

  35. lway says:

    She’s HOT. Let her flaunt it. Ain’t nothing wrong with showing some skin.
    …. She’s not flaunting at places like supermarkets (pamela Anderson …. )

  36. Notions says:

    You people are taking this photo shoot and its subsequent photoshopping waaay too seriously.

    “Who wears heels on the beach?” Who asks such inane questions of a photoshoot for a women’s fashion mag? Do you read fashion mags? All of the shoots are pretty unrealistic.

    And btw, I wear shorts and sweaters at the beach. Your core needs to keep warm. The legs? not so much.

  37. Luci says:

    Is that the best shot they could get of her mug for the cover¿?
    :P

  38. Patrice says:

    “I just want Blake to talk about who she’s boning and when she got her implants.”

    Hahahahah. As a woman I could care less about who’s in her bed, but that body won’t quit!! (check out the pic in the white dress for Heavens sakes) and I too would like her (and all celebs actually) to just talk about all of the work they’ve had done (file under: NEVER gonna happen)

    I have to say though, that Blake is sort of keeping in real in the sense that she’s never addressed her nose job or implants either way.

    It’s probably much better to do that than be a fake ass Nicole Kidman/Demi Moore type swearing up and down that you’d “neeeeeeever do antything to yourself” (even though you have an entirely new face every five years) but don’t care to “judge other people if they choose to do it” Good for Blake. She looks hot, has a great career, and is just being in her 20′s. Love her!

  39. Jack says:

    I think she is drop dead gorgeous ,beautiful face ,esp that gorgoeus eyes! Best body in the world!

  40. Kim says:

    Great body, horrendous posture but awful face. Not a pretty girl. She looks alot like a man/tranny.

  41. kaligula says:

    she’s extremely attractive, no one can deny that, but why do i have yet to hear anyone acknowledge that she is quite possibly the worst tv actor in the history of tv? how did she get a job as an actress when she can’t read a single line audibly and/or articulately? i’ve never seen anything like it. it’s an offense to true thespians everywhere.

  42. Alicia says:

    Well, I think she looks stunning! in the pics, and otherwise too!