Mel Gibson spends $600,000 a month, thinks Oksana only deserves 1%

fp_5388619_gibson_mel_fp_071310

Okay, this might be where Oksana loses me a little. According to Radar, in the continuing legal saga over custody of baby Lucia, Mel Gibson and Oksana Girgorieva have began discussing the financial arrangement. According to their sources, Mel Gibson is spending a whooping $600,000 A MONTH. On himself. And he wants to give Oksana $6,000 a month in child support – just one percent of his reported monthly expenditures. Of course, in the normal, real-person world, I wouldn’t scoff at $6,000 a month. AT ALL. And after all, isn’t this just Mel’s opening bid? Oksana could jack it up to two percent, easy. And that’s $12,000 a month. Damn, girl:

Scandal might have cost Mel Gibson his reputation, but not his lifestyle. The foul-mouthed actor, who will soon learn if he’ll be charged for allegedly punching his ex-lover Oksana Grigorieva and threatening to kill her, has told a judge overseeing the couple’s bitter custody battle that he blows $600,000 on himself – each month!

RadarOnline.com has learned Mel’s lawyers detailed his $7.2 million-a-year slush fund as part of their argument to limit Oksana’s child support for their infant daughter, Lucia, to $6,000-a-month.

The massive chunk of change was at the center of Wednesday’s marathon court hearing in which the Russian musician requested a judge increase Mel’s support payments for their nine-month-old.

While Oksana claims she should be entitled to more, Mel is insisting some of her expenses – such as bodyguards – are a waste. Mel’s lawyers are arguing Lucia is a baby and doesn’t need more than the $6,000 he plans to pay, despite it being only 1% of what he shells out on himself each month.

Team Mel claims his own expenses are not an extravagance but a necessity — the whopping total is just for his living costs and doesn’t even include such luxuries as his private jet.

Yet, as Mel continues to live a lavish lifestyle, he has handed over just $18,000 in child support since last December, according to sources inside Oksana’s camp.

Despite Mel’s admission that he is living-life-large, the Lethal Weapon star protested he was broke in the infamous audio tapes, claiming the millions he made in Hollywood were gone and he doesn’t have “any f**king money!”

Mel slammed Oksana for being a “user,” who pushed him over the edge after already being stretched thin from his incredibly pricey divorce with ex-wife Robyn Moore.

“I don’t have any f** king money! I have to support you and everybody else! I have to sell paintings. I have to sell my box at the Lakers game,” Mel screamed at Oksana, in tape five.

His split from Robyn after 28 years of marriage was a near-billion dollar divorce. With no pre-nuptial agreement, Robyn was legally entitled to half of everything Mel had earned including a host of homes in Malibu and Costa Rica, along with his own tropical island paradise in Fiji.

[From Radar]

As always, the finances are always one of my biggest interests in a split. Smart celebrities have always kept their financials separate – that’s how you know Sandra Bullock is a smart cookie, she always kept her money separate from Jesse James’ estate. Mel doesn’t sound like a very good businessman at all, and plus he seems like the kind of a–hole who uses his money as leverage in any argument. It will be interesting to see how this stuff plays out – and what Oksana ends up getting. I hope it’s a lot, honestly. Even though I should be all middle class and think that she doesn’t need that much money, I hope she gets a lot.

Wearing a cross and a saint necklace, Oksana Grigorieva, ex-girlfriend and mother of Mel Gibson s child, made her way into yet another attorney's office this afternoon in Los Angeles, Ca on July 23, 2010.  Fame Pictures, Inc

Hand in hand on the red carpet with controlled smiles and loving exchanges, Mel Gibson and Oksana reveal no signs of the dysfunction and disorder in their relationship. However, recent reports have shed light on the true nature of their relationship, which was shrouded in scandal from it s beginning until it s violent and bitter end. These archived pictures show the couple throughout their  Fame Pictures, Inc

42447, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - Saturday July 10, 2010. Oksana Grigorieva, Mel Gibson's ex-girlfriend, leaves a Ralphs grocery store in Los Angeles. Mel Gibson was recently caught on tape admitting he punched the mother of his love child. Photograph: James Breeden/Jordan Lockhart/Pacific Coast News.com

Header: Vintage Mel Gibson, credit: Fame.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

50 Responses to “Mel Gibson spends $600,000 a month, thinks Oksana only deserves 1%”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LittleFATMe says:

    That first pic is awesome – he looks like the bat shit crazy person he sounds likein his love tapes!

  2. irishserra says:

    I can’t stand Mel, but I don’t know…I think with $6,000.00 a month in child support and A JOB, Oksana will do just fine.

  3. Fluffy Kitten Tail says:

    Okay, how is she entitled to more than $6,000 per month? She had a child, they were an item, for what two years? Didn’t she, in fact turn down a huge chunk of change before?

    I don’t get it. He is an abusive ass, but that doesn’t mean he owes her money. Jail time, maybe, but not a ton of money. His ex-wife, Robyn was/is entitled to a huge chunk, as she was his WIFE, and bore 7 children. Octosana doesn’t deserve anymore than $6k. That is a resonable amount on which to raise one child. IMO.

  4. Kitten says:

    Ew! THIS sure as hell ain’t Hot Guy Friday.

    BTW, I hope she gets as much money as she can from him because I know that will destroy him.

  5. Whatever says:

    Seriously, it’s CHILD support, not side piece support. She is getting a house, car, medical insurance and other expenses paid, so the $6000 is basically spending money for her. The baby is a BABY, so she isn’t spending a fortune on food either. Plus I’m sure she gets cash from Dalton.

    I know Mel is a douche, but getting knocked up by rich men is NOT a career choice. If she needs to spend more than $6000 plus Dalton’s contribution, which I’m sure is several more thousand, if she needs more than that in spending cash, she needs to get a JOB. After all, she also is getting the nanny paid by Mel, so there is no reason for her not to work if she needs more cash.

    It sickens me to see women like her. I can’t imagine whoring myself out like that for money. Gross.

  6. Stronzilla says:

    Words fail to describe how repugnant this man is, how totally devoid of character or integrity. But the fact remains he did not marry her and he is only responsible for child support. And if that support is based upon earnings accumulated during the 3 years they were ‘a couple’ it will be slim pickings. His prime earning years were during his marriage and that’s why Robin deserves every penny. Oksana should negotiate a reasonable support amount payable until Lucia is 18, indexed for inflation and with a nice balloon payment for when she reaches the age of majority, and simultaneously mount a case against this cowardly bully for assault and battery asking for severe punitive damages. Then she should say good riddance and throw a party.

  7. Green Is Good says:

    Octosana can live on 6000 per month. Most of us could. I WISH I was collected that per month!

    Mel is a big jerk, and out of his mind, but why shouldn’t he spend his money? He earned it. What’s Octosana done except have his kid and put up with his sh*t for 2 years? That doesn’t warrant her being set up for life. Child support, of course.

  8. jodie says:

    Since mel is paying for her house, 6000 is more than enough for a 1 year old as I have friends receiving a couple hundred a month and doing just fine. When lucia is older maybe more is needed but she’ll be fine now. Oksana needs to stop being so money hungry or else some might start to believe the extortion claims.

  9. Cheyenne says:

    $600K a month on what?!

  10. kdz2cents says:

    What do you get for cheating on your wife of 28 years? #askMel

  11. canadianchick says:

    I’ve heard its expensive to raise a child in California, $6000 is a lot to me but, if he has the cash, he should pay for his daughter to live as well as his other kids.

  12. sapphire says:

    Radar somehow forgot that the $6000 is after expenses and houseing. If this chick wants to sue him for assault and the jury pops him, fine. But she isn’t entitled to anything other than CHILDsupport.

  13. CathyT says:

    Mel pays for her house, her nanny, her lawyers, and Lucia’s medical insurance. Add $6000 plus $10,000 a month from Timothy Dalton, that gives Oksana $192,000 a year in spending money, TAX-FREE.

  14. A Lawyer to Be says:

    Many people don’t realize that child support is based on the parents’ incomes. In some states minor children are entitled up to 25% of the gross income.

    Mel had the option of avoiding this nonsense- by staying faithful to his wife and spending $5 on a box of condoms when he was stepping out.

    You either pay now or pay later. He’ll remember this when he’s signing over the child support checks for the next 18 years.

    Lucia should not be raised differently because she was the product of an affair. She did not choose to be born. It’s funny how much effort both parents are putting into raising this child after she was born. If only people would think of consequences before that act on impulses…

  15. oxa says:

    In California I believe that both of his underage kids are entitled to the same standard of living in the homes of each parent. So if they are living like royalty at Mel’s house they should live like royalty with their mothers too and Mel should pay for it.
    Look at Charlie Sheens child support payments to each of his kids.

  16. lucy2 says:

    I’m kind of torn on this – something about a guy paying only 1% of his income in child support just doesn’t sit right with me. If you don’t want to risk having to pay baby mammas for decades, keep it in your pants or use birth control.
    On the other hand, it’s still a lot of money esp. when you factor in the expenses being paid for too. And I don’t think Oksana deserves millions simply because she got herself knocked up. I think Mel’s obligated to support the child, but not to provide the mother with a life of luxury.

    Considering Mel’s career has pretty much been destroyed, he should probably scale back his spending.

  17. OhCamille! says:

    Mel, maybe you should wear a condom, you self important washed up has been.
    You’ll give us what we want though, all the 411 on your money, spending, extravagance…more fodder to add to our disgust of you, so thanks for that. We need the reminder that you suck and you won’t disappoint because you think your right. What a man you are!

  18. CathyT says:

    @oxa:

    That’s why Mel put up Oksana in a multi-million dollar home and paid for a nanny. I don’t remember the Gibsons hiring a nanny, and they made their kids find jobs to earn their spending money.

    @lucy2:

    At a certain point you reach a limit to how much money a child needs. Babies don’t require endless Gerbers and Pampers. Besides, Mel is spending much more than 6000 a month on Oksana. He has paid $250 thousand so far to her lawyers, and the property taxes on the Sherman Oaks house isn’t cheap either.

  19. MissyA says:

    A measly 1% for tormenting the mother of your child? Bitch please. You can do better than that.

    Rake him across the coals, sweetheart. Take him for everything he’s worth, and then some.

    It isn’t about money or entitlement, it’s about total and abject humiliation. These settlements are so fascinating because it offers such an intimate view of the celebrity psyche. In Hollywood, the allotment of funds when a marriage sours is a strong indicator of the power dynamic/level of guilt in that relationship. Money talks, and you can see the perceived “value” of a person by their payout.

    A simplistically superficial overview on the complexities of human relationships? Yes – absolutely. But what is Hollywood if not superficial?

    I for one would love to see Gibson crawl.

    Hell hath no fury. . .

  20. aenflex says:

    I don’t like Mel, and I don’t think Ox deserved any of the physical abuse and verbal tirades. The man’s nuts. But I think 6k per month is enough to raise a child on very nicely. Most people in this country raise their kids with less than half that. I also believe, wholeheartedly at this point, that Ox was in some ways using Mel to climb some sort of ladder. This doesn’t mean she deserved the abuse, but she’s no innocent bystander in all this drama. Someone from her camp leaked the tapes, (her sister?), and there’s no way to ever prove her being with Mel was based solely on love.

  21. xxodettexx says:

    i HATE mel and i do not like oksana

    having said that, i dont think she should get more than 6k a month… 6k is just fine… i make much less than that and somehow i am able to feed myself, my boyfriend, pay rent, insurances, misc bills, gas, food, 3 cats care and i even help out my parents and friends from time to time with much needed cash… its just disgusting to me that some women expect huge paydays from a short and stupid relationship with a star or rich person, i can understand when its women who have dedicated themselves solely to their husbands/children for years at the expense of their own careers and such… but this trick needs to get what she needs for her daughter, and get out while she can

  22. Jeannified says:

    Well, Oksana DOES need body guards…especially since she’s dealing with psychopathic, Mel Gibson! You know the minute she doesn’t have bodyguards, his people will swarm her and threaten her.

    She probably DOES need more than $6,000.00 a month, because Mel will surely remove her from that house, if he is able to.

  23. bizzy says:

    a) Mel is insisting some of her expenses – such as bodyguards – are a waste.

    says the man who threatened to kill her.

    b) honestly if oksana can get mel’s balls in a plastic bag as part of the settlement, i think she deserves them.

    and c) child support is not based on what it costs to raise a child. it is based on what it costs to give the child a lifestyle commensurate with the parent’s.

  24. CathyT says:

    @Jeannified:

    You wish. Oksana has a personal restraining order against Mel, and she could send him to jail if he threatened her now.

    If Mel tries to remove Oksana from his house, or if the baby develops a chronic medical problem, or any other hypothetical scenario in your imagination, then Oksana can renegotiate the child support at that time. Until those disasters occur, she’s not entitled to baby mamma support.

  25. ghostbuster says:

    once again fellow readers, most of you impress me 🙂 look, we all know mel flipped his lid, but i really dont know if the abuse was as extreme as oksana claims. to me, she is the very definition of a gold digger. of course he should have to pay some sort of child support, enough money that their child should never go without. she was a piece of arm candy for him and i dont think she deserve diddly. before all this came out i thought that she got preggers on purpose(to get money from mel). its really horrible that mel is so rancid, but i dont think she is 100% innocent. BTW does anyone think she looks like octomom? i always think ‘why is octomom hanging with mel?’

  26. Kitten says:

    b) honestly if oksana can get mel’s balls in a plastic bag as part of the settlement, i think she deserves them.
    **************************************
    Haaaaaaaaaaa! Awesome.

  27. original kate says:

    child support is based on percentage of income, not some random dollar amount that is pulled out of thin air. this should be no different. he should just give her the money – the baby will have money for the therapy she will no doubt need, oksana will find another rich guy and mel will (hopefully) fade into oblivion. then we can all get back to our real lives, which take place on far less than $6,000 a month.

  28. CathyT says:

    @original kate:

    Oksana doesn’t want a percentage of Mel’s income because he’s not earning any money now!

  29. Kiska says:

    I’d happily accept $6,000 month to get away from that man. To me, the money would not matter as much as personal safety.

  30. gg says:

    I don’t think Oxface should get anything, only the baby, and not some outrageous amount. She should just be happy to get free of this Nutjob and try to live a non-golddigging life somewhere quietly.

  31. bellaluna says:

    This is going to sound uber-bitchy, since everyone in my house (including the cats, dammit!) has been sick for over a week, and I never went to sleep last night because the baby had me up with his ear-infection; but here goes:

    Octosana needs to take the $6K/month; go back to Russia and her “musical career”; and stay as far away from that man as possible! She has another kid with another famous, wealthy actor who pays her well; it’s not like she’s going to starve! My gosh, my son graduated from high school last year at the age of 19 (late birthday); and I doubt I’ve received $6K over the course of his ENTIRE LIFE!!

    That man kicked me; beat me; choked me; nearly killed me; before, during, and after my pregnancy. I didn’t WANT his money, and if it meant we never had to see him again, that was fine with me!

    And I co-sign with every person on here who wrote that getting pregnant/having a kid with a rich man is not a career choice; she was arm candy; Robin was his WIFE – for 28 YEARS, no less! – and deserves every cent; etc…

  32. Westcoaster says:

    Would that six thousand a month be considered taxable income?

  33. Sincerity says:

    Frankly, it’s up to the court to determine the actual “cash allotment” that Oksana will receive for Lucia. The purpose of child support is to provide for the physical well being of a minor child not a “slush fund” for the mother to spend a her discretion.

    As Cathy T and others have mentioned, Mel Gibson is paying for Lucia’s upper class home and the expenses necessary to maintain it along with her medical expenses and a nanny. The costs of these items are factored into determining how much additional cash is needed for miscellaneous expenses related to “Lucia’s” day-to-day care. With all the baby’s most basic needs being provided for upfront, what else would a baby really require that would exceed $6,000 per month??? Inquiring minds would really like to know!

    Oksana needs “to wake up” and see things as they really are. Mel Gibson has other obligations that are just as important. In addition to child support for Lucia, Mrs. Gibson is entitled to receive both alimony and child support. Mel Gibson is no longer the “highly bankable” actor/director he once was and Oksana has unquestionably helped diminish his career prospects. It takes money to make money. I strongly suspect the costs for him to do business in Hollywood have increased significantly due to her recent public disclosures. When you’re strangling the goose who lays the golden eggs that YOU CAN’T, can you “realistically” expect to profit?

  34. bellaluna says:

    @ Westcoaster –

    No. In the state of California, child support is deducted from the absentee parent’s pay(check) AFTER taxes have been paid. Spousal support IS considered taxable income to the person receiving the spousal support. (My Mom’s in family law 😉 )

  35. Whatever says:

    I strongly suspect the costs for him to do business in Hollywood have increased significantly due to her recent public disclosures. When you’re strangling the goose who lays the golden eggs that YOU CAN’T, can you “realistically” expect to profit?
    ****************

    You know Mel’s lawyers are using this. And showing evidence of the bills and related expenses being paid to support Oksana’s lifestyle. $6000 makes a good headline, but I’m sure an additional $10K or more is being spent paying bills, making the total that she is actually receiving much higher.

    So if he never works again after all this public f*ckery and his future earnings are $0, does she get a percentage of that amount? Now that would be karma worth watching for both of them!

  36. Debbie says:

    whatever, sincerity and Cathy T agree with you guys, They never lived together, were not engaged nor married, She does not need a penny more. It’s time for this Miss nobody to get off her Russian arse and actually get a job for once in her life, instead of relying men with money to hand it over.

    Lucia is well provided for, A Nanny, Insurance and her needs are met.

    This piece of white Russian trash is living in a house provided for her, a Car Timothy Dalton is still handing Money over for her.

    what is her problem?

    On her page from Icon she had her self down as a professional Model, a trained singer and a Piano player classic trained.
    so get a job plain ans simple.

    And NO she does not need Body guards, this is all just to get attention.

    Debbie

  37. Holly says:

    Ok. All drama aside, that top pic has been seriously photoshopped. Someone has selected sections of his face and cranked up the contrast. At my job, we do the same thing, only we drop the contrast to help DIMINISH wrinkles on our clients. Who wrecked that pap shot?

  38. Cruisin Through says:

    What’s wrong with 6 grand a month? That would probably be a raise from her pre-Mel lifestyle? I don’t like either one of them but how Mel spends his millions is his business and she doesn’t get a say in it. She shouldn’t beome a millionaire off of child support just cuz she was banging a multimillionaire. 6k is more than fair whether you hate Gibson or not.

  39. Uzi says:

    Oksana’s sense of entitlement never ceases to amaze me! She has never really grasped the fact that she was Mel’s mistress…not his wife, not a real girlfriend. By her own admission they were “together” three years, and for most of that time theirs was a part time relationship. I’m not sure whether or not they actually lived together, but if they did, it was only for a couple of months. Oksana has always been jealous of Robyn and her kids and their lifestyle, and, IMO, the timing of this latest money grab is no coincidence, coming right after Mel and sons flews in on a private jet from a vacation in Fiji. How dare this side piece woman think she and her meal ticket baby deserve the same treatment as Mel’s wife of 30 years and his legitimate children! Did he ask her to have his baby? Did he tell her he’d leave his wife for her? My guess is the answer to both questions is “no.” When Oksana told Mel she was pregnant he could’ve written her a big check and sent her and the baby away, but he didn’t. He accepted resonsibility, tried to make their half-assed relationship work, and became a devoted father to the baby. Listen to the tapes Oksana leaked…he clearly states, “I will take care of the child…” That’s why he’s invoved in this nasty custody case. Mel will always take care of the baby. Oksana needs to enjoy her $3 million home, luxury car, nanny and $6,000 child support payments (plus whatever she’s getting from Dalton) and STFU!

  40. SoCal says:

    I’m getting very annoyed reading the same ignorant comment on every website (Sweetnut has many alias’)

    1) Timothy Dalton is not responsible for supporting Mel Gibson’s baby!

    2) I live in L.A.. Where did you get the idea Oksana lives in a multi-million house?
    The house is in Sherman Oaks. Get over it!!

    3) I would think Mel would worry about the safety of his child. Her house doesn’t have much security. A bodyguard is not an unnecessary expense.

    4) The state of California uses a formula under Family Code Section 4055 to determine child support payments, however Mel falls within the extraordinarily high income category.
    Either way, he is underpaying.

    Los Angeles County Bar Association – Children of Fortune

    http://www.lacba.org/showpage.cfm?pageid=1184

  41. mymy says:

    My take. A house, a car, and pay for taxes ,school and health care and 6,000 would be a good number.But that stuff is not set in stone. So she might have to get all that. And 1% minus that stuff is not enough. Kids are not supposed to live poorly with mom and then go to Rich dads house. If I had money I would set my ex up so the kid would be happy.Just because you don’t make it. You didn’t have a kid with a person that is so generous with themselves. He impregnated a woman who isn’t wealthy. It was his choice to not wear a condom. If you do the law she would be eligible for much more. Based on the 17 percent formula. Don’t hate. And don’t act like you know what you would do if you found yourself in these circumstances.

  42. Lila says:

    Is he a crack addict? Who spends that much money on anything?

  43. Sincerity says:

    Hi, Debbie. I really love your posts, too. Have a wonderful weekend!

    @Uzi

    Enough said! From what I can understand, Oksana signed away any rights to Mel Gibson’s fortune not that she had ANY to begin with. She’s only using Lucia to accumulate money that she’s NOT entitled to. In the end, she’s going to end up with substantially less than what was negotiated during their mediation in May. Of course, her attorneys will be quite content because THEY’RE GETTING PAID!!!

  44. REALIST says:

    Okay, we all know Mel is more Catholic than the pope, so he likely wants to spread his “seed” as much as possible. Poor Robyn, how DID she survive as long as she did? 7, or was it 8, children with this megalomaniac?.

    As for Mel and Oksana, I’m sure using a condom never crossed his mind (pay attention, John Edwards!), and he may have even encouraged his “part time girlfriend” to conceive a child with him. Or, I’m sure given his “devout” nature he at least discouraged her from using effective birth control.
    After all, they were sooo chirpy, both of them, when she got pregnant. I thought if I read the caption “Songbird” in reference to Oksana one more time when she got knocked up, I was gonna…well, you get the idea…
    First: Mel Gibson should NEVER have unsupervised visitation with this child. He is mentally unstable and incapable of caring for anyone who can’t take care of himself or herself.
    As for the money, Mel probably has a net worth of what-billions? He can cough up much more than $6K a month, especially if he wants his daughter to stay close to him in trendy (and expensive) LA.
    Oksana should get a job? Well, maybe when her daughter starts pre-school. Until then, it’s quite clear little Lucia needs the full attention, support, and love of her mother (and anyone else who can offer a positive influence in that obviously troubled household).
    The only kid I can think of who has the potential for a more screwed up life is Beatrice, the daughter of (Sir) Paul McCartney and Heather Mills. She may be crazy, but he’s a megalomaniac (see above) as well. And those two absolutely HATE each other..

  45. SoCal says:

    @Westcoaster & bellaluna
    Amounts received for child support is not income to the payee.
    Child support is tax-free to the recipient but not deductible by the payer.
    One parent can claim the dependent exemption.

  46. Uzi says:

    @REALIST…

    “…it’s quite clear little Lucia needs the full attention, support, and love of her mother…”

    I couldn’t agree more, but, unfortunately, her mother has used her as a meal ticket from the day she was born. Oksana turned down $15 million because she thought she was entitled, and could get, more. Whatever Mel’s faults (and there are many!), I think he’s the more genuinely loving parent. I’m sure he quickly realized that Oksana doesn’t share Robyn’s maternal qualities, which is why he pays for a nanny to ensure the baby receives the proper care. Let’s face it, if he didn’t care about this child he would’ve made Oksana sign a confidentiality agreement and paid her big bucks to take the baby and go back to Russia. At his age and with all his other problems he sure doesn’t need all this drama! Rest assured that Lucia will have a trust fund and live the life of luxury…

    As for Beatrice McCartney, I totally disagree with you. Paul is a loving, devoted father and, from what I’ve heard (I know people who’ve dealt with him), an all around good guy. Remember that Heather was his wife, albeit briefly, so she is entitled to money and a lifestyle that a mistress/baby mama like Oksana is not.

  47. angelika says:

    @Debbi
    ‘This piece of white Russian trash’

    Isn’t Mel Gibson a product of his own society?

  48. Debbie says:

    She is white Russian trash Just look into her past she has tried this many times with men she has been involved with over the years,

    The UK Media and the European Media are far more harsh on her than the US Media, because they Know all about her past history.
    Debbie

  49. angelika says:

    @Debbi
    What a sad,angry,little person you are..I wouldnt even try to confront you..But you make all MG defenders look like arrogant and ignorant bunch of fools..Work out your defence methods and try to be a respectful opponent

  50. Frank Snapp says:

    Mel Gibson never deserved, no one does, to be worth any more than several times anyone else. Therefore, he wouldn’t get to keep that money he delusionally believes, most likely, he earned. As for the gold digger, I think she and the baby could get by, even in CA, on about $4000 a month or less if she lived simply. Better yet, take the baby and move in with family. We can’t afford, ecologically, the exploitation and hoarding of capitalism.