Lindsay Lohan selling leggings

I believe that the bigger the celebrity ego, the more second careers they try to have. And if they keep trying new careers instead of working on just doing one thing right… well that’s what I like to call the Lindsay Lohan formula. No one would really call Lohan a good actress anymore. She was great in Mean Girls and a few other films back in the day. But everything since Herbie Fully Loaded has pretty much sucked – the pinnacle of suckitude of course being I Know Who Killed Me.

Instead of working on becoming a non-sucking actress (yes I mean that the way it sounded) Lohan decided to get her ass to the music studio, with varying results, depending on your opinion. Now that that’s done with, Lohan has moved on to the number one favorite celebrity second career: fashion designer, or more accurately known as product endorser. Lohan has put out a line of leggings, which will range from $40 to $140.

LINDSAY LOHAN’s leggings are getting closer to store shelves! ET has learned that the starlet’s new line, named “6126” after MARILYN MONROE’s birthdate, has been picked up at L.A.’s posh Fred Segal boutique and online retailer www.revolveclothing.com and will start shipping around August 30th, “6126” LLC partner KRISTI KAYLOR says.

Last month, Lindsay caused a frenzy in Beverly Hills when she and two models posed for publicity shots wearing the pieces. So far, the “6126” collection includes “footless tights” made from “Supima cotton and Modal ribbed knits” along with other fabrics spruced up with zippers, foil prints, yarn dyes and sexy metallic and screen prints.

Cashmere leg warmers and something called an “ankle glove,” a modified warmer that covers the ankle, are also part of the line, which will start at $40 and go up to $140.

[From Entertainment Tonight]

Well thank goodness. I had this extra $140 sititng here, and I was trying to figure out the best way to completely blow my money on something generally unnecessary and ridiculously overpriced. And $140 for leggings seems to be just about the stupidest thing I could possibly do – so I’m going with that.

In other LiLo news, she and Samantha Ronson haven’t broken up. The pair had a fight at a sushi restaurant the other night, prompting mass blog panic that the two were headed for splitsville.

Forget those break-up rumors. On Monday, Sam Ronson visited Lindsay Lohan on the Los Angeles set of her new comedy Labor Pains.

Blogs had speculated that the pair were on the rocks after they got into a fight Saturday at Glendale, California, sushi hot spot Katsuya. (A witness tells Usmagazine.com that Lohan, 21, stormed out of the restaurant in tears. Ronson, 30, was overheard saying “it was just a joke.”)

But on the Pains set, the two were photographed hugging and laughing.

[From Us Weekly]

Here’s Lindsay having dinner with Samantha Ronson and Lily Allen at Il Sole in Los Angeles last night. Images thanks to WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan selling leggings”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Bodhi says:

    She looks truely awful these days

  2. Jody says:

    I believe the term is: Jack of all trades, master of none.

  3. Mr. T says:

    Leggings? Wow, she’s beginning to make Jessica Simpson look sophisticated.

  4. Jen says:

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! WILL THE MADNESS EVER END?

  5. Syko says:

    Jeez. Even for the low end of the price range, $40, I want a halfway decent pair of slacks I can wear to work, not stupid leggings. Having Marilyn Monroe’s birthdate on the tag would not up their value in my eyes.

  6. Bellatrix says:

    That the girl wants to sell leggings some a rather logic twist.
    But $140 leggings?

    Excuse me?
    Let me have a good cough.
    There you go, fur ball.

    I can buy three pairs of professional quality ballet dancing leggings for that price.
    Which I’d wear to go my dancing class. Not to look “trendy”. Leggings were in four years ago. And they were out of fashion again two weeks later. :mrgreen:

  7. Alexis says:

    Cashmere leg warmers and ankle gloves. REALLY? She’s THAT dissatisfied with socks and pants? Will Samantha be sporting them? That would make me smile.

  8. vdantev says:

    Memo to Lindsay:

    The 80’s are OVER.

  9. Bodhi says:

    What the hell are ankle gloves anyway?

  10. gg says:

    Gah, what a stupid thing to manufacture. Nobody even wears leggings except Lindsey and Sienna Miller, and even they look retarded in them, and cotton ones photograph especially poorly and don’t last. 😕

    Not to mention the RULE CARVED IN STONE: OVER 30? DO NOT PUNISH THE WORLD BY WEARING LEGGINGS. We don’t want to seeeee!

  11. Mairead says:

    …foil…. prints…. FOIL …. on cotton leggings…. *mindf*ck ❗ *

  12. angiee says:

    why waste $140 on leggings when everybody can buy them cheaper like $5 or so. Shes an idiot. Especially for selling them during the summer!

    also who’d want to buy leggings with knee pads?……?

  13. Syko says:

    I still have some leggings, gg, and I’ve been 30 twice now. I no longer wear them outside the house, but they’re great for scrubbing the bathroom floor.

  14. KateNonymous says:

    Marilyn’s birthday, huh? Well, that makes sense. There are so many photos of her in leggings.

  15. A.J. says:

    “also who’d want to buy leggings with knee pads?……?”

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that coked-out, firecrotched skanks who like to get busy in bathroom stalls and stairwells would find good use in leggings with knee pads.

    *coughcough*

  16. Kerri says:

    The only thing that leggings are good for is wearing -under- long skirts in the winter where really cold weather is a factor. Although there was that one summer when I was 15 and peasant skirts were ALL the rage, and my mom made me wear leggings under them. But that was longer ago than I care to admit. 🙂

  17. devilgirl says:

    That’s why they call her ‘Leggings Lohan”

  18. niggie says:

    dood. shes gona insane i mena like lindsey lohann is a bitchh. i dont really mean itt. but shes like a lemme see…, bratt?

  19. Cassie says:

    ‘Marilyn’s birthday, huh? Well, that makes sense. There are so many photos of her in leggings.’

    You just completely cracked my shit up…that was hilarious!

  20. saintdevil says:

    The only people wearing leggings regularly are Lindsay, Tyra Banks and the incredibly lumpy-assed women frequently spotted shopping in Wal-Mart.
    The latter don’t spend 40$ on them, let alone 140$! 😈

  21. ava says:

    I think having marilyn monroe’s bday was not the greatest idea. But I’m sure there will be plenty on here who are commenting who will go and buy these american apparel knock offs at wolford prices (who are both also overpriced, but at least they are established). People are so quick to talk shit, but if these idiots weren’t out here buying what all their celebs wear or stick their names on, it would be a much tougher to start some nonsense line among the many our materialistic society currently supports. Myself included unfortunately, but no more, I refuse to make whomever rich off my misery and hard earned money

  22. Low, Lohan says:

    How much lower can she stoop? First she thinks that she is a fashion icon and just can’t keep from self promoting but Lindsay, those tights are butt ugly. Also, you are not Ellen, so please don’t sell your coming out story for money, that is just a hideous thing to do and only serves to take integrity from others, like the aforementioned Ellen, who are not in a freak circus act of a relationship. Denegrate yourself much Linds???

  23. Scout says:

    she really was be bored and more than once I’m sure