Jennifer Aniston “confronted” Perez Hilton: “Why are you so mean?”

wenn3107750

On today’s episode of Ellen, Jennifer Aniston talks about how she’s not adopting a Mexican baby. That one is a given – Aniston Baby Watch has been in effect for a decade, and no one has the heart to call it off. But Aniston also discussed something new! Perez Hilton, and how he was mean, and how he’s not anymore:

Sick of all the nasty things being blogged about her, Jennifer Aniston took matters into her own hands. Nearly literally. The former ‘Friends’ star, who features in the upcoming comedy ‘Just Go With It,’ appears on ‘The Ellen Degeneres Show’ on Thursday, and talks in part about her chance confrontation with the self-proclaimed ‘Queen of all Media,’ who developed a reputation as one of the nastiest celebrity bloggers around.

“I ran into Perez Hilton in a garage. One of those moments you just never expect to happen. I had finished dinner with a girlfriend and we were driving out and I saw this tall, long, lean person and I say, “Who is that?” And she says, “I think that’s Perez Hilton.” I said, “No. I have to say something to him. I have to.” So I pulled up and we were sort of scoping each other out as I was pulling the car up. I just rolled down the window and I was like, “Hi.” And he went, “Hi.” We stood there like two deer in headlights. And I just said, “Come here. Just talk to me for a second.” It was one of those great moments. It was a lovely meeting and I was just like, “Why are you so mean?”

Turns out, it worked. Hilton in fact went on Degeneres’ show in October to announce that he was no longer going to bully.

“Over the last two weeks I have been doing everything I can to bring awareness to the teen suicides and gay bullying,” Hilton told DeGeneres. “In doing so, a lot of people have called me a hypocrite and a bully myself and a big one… From now on I really want to be part of the solution and not part of the problem.”

So far, it’s been a promise kept, something Aniston gives him credit for.

“There’s something really great about putting a human being in front of another human being and then the reality that those words,” she said, “even if it’s for humor or effect or whatever, there’s a human being behind all of that… And he’s kept it up too which is good.”

[From Huffington Post]

I love Aniston getting all sanctimonious about bullying when she’s BFFs with Chelsea Handler, I really do. It’s so rich. Anyway, just an hour ago, Perez offered up his take on this Aniston story, saying in part, “I had not talked about meeting Jennifer Aniston out of respect for her and respect for the situation. It was actually a very powerful moment, I think for both of us. I told her the answer I would always tell myself — at the time, I viewed her as a character. I think it was very cathartic for her and for me.” So… Perez is now tight with Aniston, I guess…?

Sidenote: I love that Perez is wearing a t-shirt from his (and Aniston’s) one-time makeout partner, John Mayer. It makes my life.

wenn2747101

Photos courtesy of WENN.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

136 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston “confronted” Perez Hilton: “Why are you so mean?””

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. maria says:

    Give it up, woman. You were not born with blonde hair or blue eyes and you are as fake as Paris Hilton.

  2. munchies says:

    so she really approached Perez Hilton? How cheap.

    Whos Perez Hilton by the way? Brother of Paris Hilton? Uggh!

  3. Megan says:

    I tend to disagree with her on the statement that he’s “sticking to” not bullying. He’s not as outwardly calling people disgusting blobs of slutty fat, but he’s still super preachy about things. He’s gone from bitchy girl bullying to bullying the way a judgmental mother-in-law does.

  4. Laurie says:

    Why is Perez mean?? How about asking Jen, why do you make such crappy films?

  5. Riley says:

    Do people still read Perez Hilton? I totally quit reading his stupid blog when I discovered Celebitchy a couple of years ago. Celebitchy is much more fun and informative than stupid Perez and the writing is quality. Celebitchy is the Ivy League of celebrity blogs. Perez Hilton is not even close.

  6. nnn says:

    Woman, grow the fuck up and stop whining !

    You are not above anyone else to be immune to mockery. If you meet him, ignore him instead of whining constantly.

  7. Roxanne75 says:

    Wow everyone hates Aniston now…nice how the blogs brainwash people in hating or liking stars. What did she do? Bad actress–sure but as a person she does no harm.

  8. Canuck says:

    Re: Chelsea Handler… surely you don’t expect Aniston to fight AJ’s battles for her, do you? If Ms. Jolie has a problem with Handler being mean, maybe she should confront her herself, just as Aniston seems to have taken care of Perez herself.

  9. jay says:

    I was skeptical as soon as she described him as “long, lean”. Bitch, please. He’s one cheeseburger away from Blimpie.

    He’s a perfect example of the way abuse (I am assuming he was bullied as a child/young man/now? I’m torn)can make a person choose their reactions: become one or strive against it. He absolutely chose the former for quite some time and now that it’s not so “fun” and profitable and he wasn’t on the “right” team there he’s changed. Yeah. Just call me side-eye Susie on that one towards him.

    He’s repulsive.

    She’s lucky she evah had Friends. Not much beyond that was worthwhile; and even Rachel wasn’t all that.

    Ooo, I’m feeling bitchy.I’d write a blog but it’s apparently passe to be “mean”.;-)

  10. jen says:

    I tried to read him a few times after he stopped being “mean”. What a snooze-fest.

  11. lilred says:

    Looks like Perez may have been Part of JM’s world Tour,in more ways than One.

  12. nnn says:

    @ Munchie

    Whos Perez Hilton by the way?
    ————————————
    The guy who made out with Mayer just before jennifer picked up the sloppy ends.

    Same entourage…

  13. Scarlet Vixen says:

    @maria: So, neither you nor any of your friends/sisters/mom/cousins has colored their hair or worn contacts?? What woman HASN’T at one point or another? (FTR I’ve worn colored contacts, but never colored my hair–natural redhead) Sorry, but digging on JA for highlights and colored contacts is lame.

  14. lilred says:

    Laurie have you ever read his blog? That would answer your question.

  15. Str8Shooter says:

    What’s with all the JA hatred? This woman hasn’t done anything to warrant that, far as I can tell its all just jealousy.

    And she was right to confront him. Bullies need to get their comeuppance.

    That said, I am sure PH would LOVE to have a been a pretty, blond, successful (albeit limited) actress.

  16. Phoenix says:

    blah blah blah Jennifer. As for Perez, I used to love his site but then discovered others, like Celebitchy and honestly he is so boring now. For some reason a few months ago I went back through his archives and he used to really be pretty cruel, I guess I hadn’t noticed. Now all he does kiss Lady Gaga’s ass and promote his billion other websites. Oooover you Perez.

  17. Eve says:

    “…and I saw this tall, long, lean person…”

    Wait, what? I can see he has lost weight but the description above still doesn’t fit the man.

    As for gossip sites, I’m sticking with Michael K’s Dlisted and Celebitchy — even Laineygossip has been boring me lately.

  18. eja102 says:

    I also switched after finding this blog.
    and not just because the spelling is correct and there is proper sentence structure :)

    I did like that he owned up to his behaviour, and apologized to Demi for calling Rumer “potato head” all the time.
    But I still can’t read him, or his team of writers.

    As for Jen approaching him.. it is not something I would choose to do, so am I having a hard time understanding her motivation.

  19. Anon73 says:

    @Riley: same here from my end. I used to be a daily PerezHitlon reader too and swapped it for Celebitchy ; -)

  20. renee says:

    Are her eyes really not blue? I know that Paris Hilton wears blue contacts but I thought her eye colour was real. Also, co-sign with Megan and Kaiser over the hypocrisy on Jen’s part regarding Chelsea.

  21. flutters says:

    I didn’t see where Jennifer Aniston got sanctimonious about bullying? That was Perez.

    I’ve got no use for Chelsea Handler but I see a difference between a professional comic (however classless and graceless) making extreme comments that by definition we’re not supposed to take seriously and a gossip blogger who purports to be posting entertainment news. Neither is cool but the gossip blogger’s worse. Besides the basis of Chelsea’s comment that was linked is actually true even though she was incredibly vulgar about it.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: no use for any of these people (including Brangie), the attention they get is WAY out of proportion to their talent and artistic value, and I think they all probably have major issues. At least George Clooney has made an interesting movie or two. And thank goodness for the Cate Blanchetts and Julianne Moores of the world who are blessed with exceptional talent that they let speak for itself.

  22. lucy2 says:

    “I was skeptical as soon as she described him as “long, lean”.” LOL me too.

    Glad to hear he’s not as horrible as he used to be, but I’ll still avoid him. I never was a regular reader, but I purposefully stopped going to his site years ago, not wanting to support someone who acted the way he did. Agree with jay’s take on it – I doubt he’s nicer because he truly wants to be.

    flutters, I whole-heartedly agree with your last sentence!

  23. Crystal says:

    Jeez you steal from Lainey’s lingo Kaiser. Create your own why don’t you.

  24. Eve says:

    Jesus, people! Her eyes are blue. Bee U El E! Blue.

    I don’t even like the woman and I can see her eyes are blue.

    P.S.: And if they were contact lenses, what’s the big deal about it? They would be of a great quality because they sure look natural.

  25. someone says:

    good for her, he has been an ass for far too long, talking sh-t about everyone, and not taking any responsibility for it! He has called her Maniston for years..why???? because hes an ass…

  26. malachais says:

    flutter, thank you. I stopped reading Perez Hilton a few months ago. All he does is plug new pop singers, upcoming artists he’s friends with, or brag about his celebrity friendships. Its annoying.

    I’m sorry but JA is really an idiot for taking a gossip blog site so seriously. Doesn’t she have a career to work on instead of reading blog stories about her or googling herself? Jeez, grow up. Every celebrity deals with an unflattering tabloid story at one point in their life. She should really be contacting US weekly and People, but no – as long as Jen is in a magazine cover in every newsstand she’s fine with it.

  27. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    She didn’t say she was above criticism-she was just being a tad facetious by confronting him. But really, why was Perez Hilton such a jerk? Anyone who read his blog knew he was just unnecessarily dickish-he could have had a successful blog without being gross and rude. If she said something, good for her. Some people, eja102 and nnn, don’t like to “just ignore” or let go of stuff. Sometimes you should say something. And if someone has been ripping on you constantly when you haven’t really done anything, and ignoring it is just encouraging them, you have to stand up for yourself and say something.

    And she is not responsible for what her friends do. She does not have to retract every stupid thing her friends say. I can’t imagine being held accountable for what someone else does. She’s not a bully just because one of her friends is an insult comic.

    And what difference does it make if she colors her hair and has contacts? Everyone knows she colors her hair. She had brown hair on Friends and now she has lightish blonde. I don’t see the issue.

  28. sad says:

    yeah, those aren’t contacts. She has pretty eyes and that’s what her appeal is.

  29. someone says:

    maria??? I have been a Jen fan for a long time, and as far as I can remember, she has always had blue eyes, even back when she was a kid…. she does lighten her hair, but so what??? so do millions of other women world wide…

  30. Moreaces says:

    Re: Chelsea Handler… surely you don’t expect Aniston to fight AJ’s battles for her, do you? If Ms. Jolie has a problem with Handler being mean, maybe she should confront her herself, just as Aniston seems to have taken care of Perez herself.
    =============
    Im sure AJ does not give a frogs fat azz, what Hanler has to say, she after all has a busy and fulfilling life. Where as Aniston does not, so little things like a blogster really bothers her cause she just has nothing else worthy to talk about.

  31. Moreaces says:

    I also switched after finding this blog.
    and not just because the spelling is correct and there is proper sentence structure
    ========
    Count me in as well, I use to go on his site from time to time, and he was mean just for the sake of being mean, once I found this site and HuffPo, I really dont visit any other sites. PH blog is not fareing well anyway these days, a lot of posters have abandoned ship, and for good reason

  32. Eve says:

    Eh…I meant “Bee El U E”.

    EDIT: @ dit (# 35) — don’t mistake harsh, but well-based criticism for bullying.

    @ Kaiser: if someday you become nice and cuddly that will be the day I’ll stop reading your blog.

  33. dit says:

    LOL, Kaiser, maybe if you met Jen Aniston, you’d stop bullying her too?

  34. Cakes says:

    I also switched from Perez’s site to celebitchy. I love how Celebitchy and crew have intelligent things to say about their write ups along with the well deserved snark. I also love reading the comments and that no one starts the thread with “FIRST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” GAH!
    As far as Aniston being friends with Handler I kinda see it both ways. I partly agree with Flutters that Handler is making jokes that shouldn’t be taken seriously. The problem with that is Handler makes fun of peoples kids and some of her jokes can be quite cruel too. So I don’t fully accept that Aniston is being a hypocrite about bullying based solely on her friendship with Handler but it certainly doesnt look good.

  35. Pow! says:

    I don’t see how JA is immature or that she needs to grow up. I think anyone in a situation where they are constantly bullied (no, it wasn’t just once) wants to confront the person doing it. What’s wrong with that? I’m not team Aniston or any of that… I just don’t see the reason for all of the hate.

  36. Kaiser says:

    dit: Here’s what would happen:

    Aniston: “Why sss-ss-so mean? *hiccup*”

    Me: “Have another drink, honey.”

  37. Pow! says:

    The Hamm is my Dream Man: I completely agree with everything you said.

  38. Kim says:

    Maria – your comment made my day!!! hilarious!

    Would anyone read Perez blog if he was nice? Duh thats the whole idea. The public doesnt want to sit around and say nice things about celebs. They get their egos stroked every second of every day. They could stand to have humility and laugh at themselves.

  39. francesca says:

    And yet she still doesn’t apologize or acknowledge her use of the word “retard” on national television. It’s amazing she can work with that board in her eye.

  40. Maud says:

    Kaiser is warm and fuzzy compared to Todd at IDLYITW. He’s hardcore.

  41. WhiteNoise says:

    This sentence from Jen – “There’s something really great about putting a human being in front of another human being and then the reality that those words, even if it’s for humor or effect or whatever, there’s a human being behind all of that…” has convinced me that yes, she is permanently stoned/drunk. Could she be more mawkishly inarticulate?

  42. Kim says:

    I doubt if Angie even knows who CH is unless you watch E, visit gossip sites or watch entertainment shows she is unknown. Most of the people I know have never heard of her.

  43. Anon says:

    I use Perez Hilton’s site as a table of contents. You can go there, scroll through it really fast (he keeps things short and simple most of the time, and he posts a LOT) looking for interesting gossip, which I then seek out at other blogs for more substantial information/opinions. It is easier then going to 6 different gossip sites a day, looking for articles.

    Celebitchy and Lainey Gossip are the only two blogs I actually read daily.

    And Jennifer Aniston? Meh.

  44. Cheyenne says:

    If you think Perez is mean, he’s sweetness and light compared to Michael K. The difference between them is Michael K is often funny, and Perez never is.

  45. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    Kaiser: Lady, you are hilarious.

  46. flutters says:

    @Cheyenne Michael K also relentlessly mocks himself so he has a self awareness that bloggers like Perez and Lainey lack. That’s the big reason I read here and DListed but don’t bother with Perez and Lainey (other than them both being highly unreliable). Perez and Lainey have got too caught up in themselves and it’s like they write like they have this image to maintain and their blogs have become about their “brand” resulting in them selling out. But at CB and DListed there’s no vanity writing.

  47. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “Some people, eja102 and nnn, don’t like to “just ignore” or let go of stuff.”

    what’s amazing, Hamm, is that, on THIS site, you have to point that out to people.

    some of the posters on this site, who don’t need to be named, have a REALLY HARD TIME ignoring some things, or just “letting something go”.

    know what I mean?

  48. Camille says:

    Ugh, just no words… :roll:

    @malachais: ITA.
    And I thought she didn’t take herself seriously, yeah right. :roll:

    @Kaiser: LOL! :D

  49. KJ says:

    Did anyone else see her on Conan last night?? She seemed to slur (again) a couple of times-but mostly-she was so FAKE and her laugh was so forced!! I would never waste 2 hours of my life to see any movie she is in.

  50. Anna says:

    …and this is being brought up now, because Jen can’t afford another bos office bomb.

  51. Mari says:

    Wow, the Aniston haters showed up today. I don’t care either way, but dang. Some of y’all sound worse than Perez.

  52. nnn says:

    @50 Praise

    First of i don’t need to be lectured by anyone.

    Second i don’t see what i have to let go. I have a right to voice my opinion just like you have a right to yours without being single out because YOU happen to don’t like what i wrote.

    So you are the one who should let it go instead of coming after fellow posters for an opinion that bothers YOU to the point of naming them. Just like i have the courtaey of not naming those (including at times yours) i don’t agree with or that bother me.

  53. Arianna says:

    man for once in my life aniston is not bugging me with her story.

    maybe just because i despise perez? but somebody needed to tell him to shut the hell up, whether it was her or not I really don’t care.

    everyone is a bully, so to call her duplicitous and sanctimonious is obvious and unnecessary
    this story was more interesting than most of her other boring ass ones

  54. Tif says:

    @WhiteNoise
    Maybe if she read more than gossip sites and mags, shed be able to create a coherent sentence. Her brain cells are dead…

  55. Praise St. Angie! says:

    um…nnn, I’M not lecturing anyone.

    I’m also not telling anyone to let anything go, and I also never said you weren’t entitled to your opinion.

    What I DID say was that, based on how people don’t let things go on here, NOT MENTIONING YOU SPECIFICALLY or “singing you out”, it’s silly that Hamm had to tell ANYONE that some people can’t just ignore some things that are said.

    You need an example? just take a gander at any Jolie thread where some posters feel the need to respond to ANY perceived negative comment. You may or may not be one of them, but the fact that you assumed I was referring to you is telling. I guess you feel that it applies to you. or that it COULD apply to you.

    I actually don’t really care what you write – I never bother to read your posts because they’re usually several paragraphs long.

    My advice? read more carefully, and respond to the person who was actually directing a comment at you.

  56. Cheyenne says:

    @Praise: You are so full of it. If you didn’t care what nnn wrote, you wouldn’t post a 6-paragraph comment on it.

  57. nnn says:

    You still didn’t need to use my name to make a point. That’s basic courtesy

    As for the post you are referring to, nobody in here is innocent. We all bitch at some point towards X or Y celebrity. So i find it quite arrogant to even write such a post and for you to name people.

    Though you can fall in the same example you imply, I would have never use yours to make that point.

  58. Angel says:

    i can’t even with this place sometimes.

    Stop being so mean toward other women! It’s just gross and so tacky.

    Notice how when Kaiser is ‘bitchy’ it’s with an edge of humour? Yeah. Okay. Usually.

    Some of you are just downright catty and vile and vicious any time a female is posted, though. Please, for the love of gossip, just chill!

  59. renai(jrt) says:

    JA seems as though she has become more and more of a fame-whore as she ages and seems more desperate in her confrontation to win over the fame whore makers. As people like Perez make their livings off of others peoples fame. She has publicaly complained about the paps and then she befriends them because she is a liberals and thats what liberals do… they think they can fix all that is wrong and bad in the world with their power and extreme money, as if money really matters. Doesnt make you any better of a person. This article proves it.

  60. Stacy says:

    wow, people talk about how bullies should watch what they say. Ive been reading nothing but malicious words on this thread.

  61. eja102 says:

    And here I thought no one read my posts.

    Thank you for attempting to clarify Jen’s intentions, Hamm.
    I am sure she has taken more than her share of criticism from Perez.
    I still do not understand what her motivation is, beyond more press. If she truly wanted to deal with any issues from their past, any blog posts he made about her, then she would have done so without needing to alert people she had.

    (ok, a convoluted sentence. basically, all the good reasons she did are negated by the fact she had to run to the press and tell everyone)

    edit: I appreciated the irony of Hamm’s words, Praise.

  62. renai(jrt) says:

    JA wouldnt have the money she has if not for the Perez Hiltons of the market. She should thank him and give him and the rest their fair share cut.

  63. garvels says:

    eja102-I agree with you 100%. This is all just PR stuff for her movie just like the fabricated adoption rumors that were probably generated from her camp.

    I believe she has 2 more movies coming out this year so we will probably see rumors about Jen being pregnant or Jen longing for Gerard Butler or perhaps Jennifer is Gay.

  64. Liana says:

    just for the record, I am reasonably certain that Jennifer Aniston was, indeed, born with blue eyes. Actually, most babies are. I’ve been a PA on two sets with her and she had contact lenses, but they were clear. And yet, her eyes are blue. *shrugs*

  65. Meanchick says:

    Oh goody, now we can send Jenny over to deal with the unrest in Egypt.

  66. archiepelago says:

    Celebrity gossip has hit an all time low when stars are discussing Perez Hilton on talk shows. Jeez.

  67. Zelda says:

    I’m not offended by his being mean.
    I am, however, sorely offended by how unfunny he is.

  68. Praise St. Angie! says:

    “You still didn’t need to use my name to make a point. That’s basic courtesy”

    wow. you really don’t seem to get it. Let me lay it out for you.

    Hamm commented that it’s hard for some people to ignore comments, or just let something go and not respond to it. Meaning, it was hard for JA to “let it go” and not say something to Perez Hilton. My point, since you seem to miss it completely, was that I find it ironic that this needs to be pointed out to ANYONE on this site, since there are so many posters (NOT REFERRING TO YOU) that aren’t able to let anything go, and must respond to a comment.

    I didn’t use your name to make a point. I used another person’s quote to make a point, and it happened to contain YOUR name. Did you get that?

    I TOOK A QUOTE FROM ANOTHER PERSON’S POST THAT CONTAINED YOUR NAME. NO MATTER WHOSE NAME APPEARED THERE, IT WOULD APPEAR IN MY POST AS IT WAS A DIRECT QUOTE.

    Take it up with the person who used your name originally.

    “As for the post you are referring to, nobody in here is innocent. We all bitch at some point towards X or Y celebrity. So i find it quite arrogant to even write such a post and for you to name people.”

    yeah, I’m well aware. I bitch, you bitch, we all bitch. My point, AGAIN, was that…well, I’ve stated it enough. But I’ll bet you still won’t get it and will think I was coming at you for some reason. If you want to get outraged about something that you really have no need to get outraged about, go for it. But let’s be clear. I didn’t “name” anyone. I quoted someone.

    “If you didn’t care what nnn wrote, you wouldn’t post a 6-paragraph comment on it.”

    le sigh…Cheyenne, I was referring to her OTHER, usual posts on here that are several, usually extensive, paragraphs long. Since she commented directly to ME in that ONE post, implying that I attacked her for her opinions, I responded. I don’t really care about her opinions – I care that she totally misinterpreted my post.

    but wow…I feel special. the official bully of the site deigns to pick on me!

  69. Louise says:

    I love how Jennifer takes credit for things when it really has nothing to do with her. Perez started to come down with all of the gay kids suicides. I guess since being friends with Chelsea got her to stop making fun of her, Jennifer is now doing the same thing with Perez. Tall and lean is not an accurate description. He lost a lot of weight but lean, no.

  70. renai(jrt) says:

    Uggh, just saw the preview of her new movie……doesnt look good….no wonder she is being pimped out to boost ticket sales…..

  71. renai(jrt) says:

    Perez looks like a huge Umpa lumpa in that photo

  72. Raven Sparrow says:

    @Praise St. Angie – You sound like you need a drink right about now ;)
    Don’t worry, I got what you both were saying. (you & Hamm)

  73. Raven Sparrow says:

    @Liana : How is Jenifer Aniston in real life? Is she as bad as people try to make her out to be?

    I’m just curious because I like her for what she does and who she is, just like I like AJ for what she does and who she is , just like I like SJP even though she’s not part of the infernal triangle :) I don’t feel the need to pit one against the other.

  74. Reality says:

    @Praise, at least she’s an equal opportunity bully!

    I actually think JA made a pretty good good point- that it’s easy to forget that these people are real human beings with feelings until you confront them face to face.

    It’s even easier to bitch about them from the safety of an anonymous blog, and I do sometimes wonder if all the vitriol spouted on these sites is healthy. MK gets away with it because he’s hilarious, completely unbiased, and genuinely self-deprecating. Perez on the other hand is just vile, but his site is also famous enough that most celebrities know his name now and he’s made friends with quite a few of them.

    He’s sort of ‘crossed over’ to being in the VIP room, not just reporting on it, which has clearly changed the dynamic of everything he writes.

  75. Cheyenne says:

    @Praise: I’m glad I was able to make your day.

    Really, now, you are far too intelligent to start playing the poor-little-picked-on-me card. From Aniston you expect it; from you, it’s silly and totally out of character.

  76. nnn says:

    @ 71 Praise,

    No offence, but you need to practice what you preach and let it go. You’re the one feeling the need to name and go after other posters JUST BECAUSE what they are writing fall into what YOU feel is related to ‘WON’T LET GO’, not the otherway around.

    If you can’t take it, don’t read their post instead of going after them with a paragraph long as you like to put it, just because they dare to have an opinion different than yours over a celebrity and you feel obliged to give your opinion about them/or their motivation and mindset.

    Again, noone is innocent in here, everyone is entitiled to his/her opinion without being called out or analyzed by fellow posters who think their sh*t don’t stink. Afterall, for someone who like to accuse people for not let it go, you’re the one who still call yourself Praise Saint Angie…

  77. junk573r says:

    I don’t know if this comment will make it through moderation so we will see if anyone even gets to read this.

    I think I’m half terrified her life might happen to me (childless at 40) so I almost feel bad for her, but I think she is so overexposed for the quality of work she is producing. I am actually amazed how her divorce has grown and evolved into a back up cover story for the rag mag slow season. Initially, it wasn’t really her fault the tabloids lit her on fire after the divorce but after a while she began to exploit the fact that the rags were squeezing every cent out of this story (Kaiser, I know this is the part that pisses you off). But I would laugh at her if she didn’t take advantage of the attention. She is in the business of selling her persona (thanks to Friends and a lack of actual acting talent) so not exploiting the attention she received would be career suicide. If I had gone through any kind of divorce, let alone the BRAD PITT LEFT ME FOR ANGELINA JOLIE! type of divorce, I would take full advantage of that situation to make myself more successful. Or, if for no other reason than to make myself feel better. She probably regrets having played it the way she did. I know I wouldn’t want to be the shining star for all “Minivan Majority” proving that single and 40 is a blast. I know if I were in her shoes, I’d probably give up. I’d drink my face off, look as hot as I could, and have as much fun as possible.

    I just don’t get the hate for Jen. She’s clinging to a career that she’s half built on Friends, and half built on a divorce that probably destroyed her life. She’s not the first who took advantage of a bad situation. Why single her out and sincerely hate her?

  78. Eve says:

    Ok, I’ll comment on the post’s topic now. I said it once and I’ll say it again: Aniston gives a way too much importance to things she actually should not care about, like mean gossip bloggers and Kimberly Stewart.

    Right now, after this interview, all of them know for a fact she gets upset with what they write about her, she’s admitting they can hurt her with words so chances are they’ll probably be even more “mean” to her in the future.

  79. Cheyenne says:

    nnn: for someone who like to accuse people for not let it go, you’re the one who still call yourself Praise Saint Angie…
    =========================================

    OH SNAP!! ROTFLMBAO!!!

  80. Praise St. Angie! says:

    nnn…listen, even tho I’ve said it over and over, you clearly don’t get it. or you’re choosing not to for some reason. It’s as if you’re not reading what I’ve written. other people got it, before I even had to explain it. Which makes me wonder why YOU don’t.

    but, perhaps I can remedy the whole situation.

    “Some people, INSERT NAME HERE and INSERT NAME HERE , don’t like to “just ignore” or let go of stuff.”

    will that do the trick? maybe you can re-read my original post with that as the first sentence and you’ll understand my point without being blinded by your perceived slight.

    in fact, I think I see what your issue is. I think your problem is that you think Hamm’s comment was a comment ABOUT you, not TO you. Hamm wasn’t saying “these two posters can’t let things go”, but was simply directing the comment TO YOUR ATTENTION.

  81. Cheyenne says:

    @Praise: If you’re going to spit into the wind, don’t be surprised when most of it lands back on you.

    Try inserting YOUR OWN NAME there. As nnn so cogently pointed out, the name you picked says it all.

  82. Liana says:

    “Praise St Angie” is actually an homage to Michael K from dlisted and not an “attack” on Angelina Jolie, if I’m correct in my assumption, being a dlisted reg, too.

    @Raven Sparrow: She was OK. Nice, harmless, good to the crew. Never got any notice that we were not to look at her and talk to her – she was quite friendly to all of us. She met my autistic sister and spent some time talking to her, which is why I was so disappointed when she used the word “retard.” Never got the impression that she was anything close to a rocket scientist, but she was fine.

  83. Eve says:

    in fact, I think I see what your issue is. I think your problem is that you think Hamm’s comment was a comment ABOUT you, not TO you. Hamm wasn’t saying “these two posters can’t let things go”, but was simply directing the comment TO YOUR ATTENTION.

    @ Praise St. Angie and nnn:

    That’s what I thought too. Something in the lines of “The thing is, Kaiser/Eve/Praise St. Angie/nnn/anyone else, that some people don’t ignore or let things go…”. A vocative case: when you choose to name the people who are being addressed but are neither the subject nor the object of the verb.

    There may be some snarkiness to it, but I’ve seen a lot worse things here.

    Anyway, I usually enjoy reading your comments (both nnn’s and Praise St. Angie’s) and I’d hate to see you guys fighting from now on here. Please, don’t let Celebitchy turn into Popsugar: I rarely comment on their posts anymore (it’s been ages since I posted anything there) but it used to be a really nice place to post comments and read other’s. Now it’s a complete mess.

  84. Renee says:

    @Kaiser
    Aniston: No, I’m being sirrus.

  85. Praise St. Angie! says:

    ““Praise St Angie” is actually an homage to Michael K from dlisted and not an “attack” on Angelina Jolie, if I’m correct in my assumption, being a dlisted reg, too.”

    absolutely correct, Liana. and I’ve explained that a few times on here. nnn may have missed it, but cheyenne definitely didn’t, because I’ve told her that, directly, when she accused me of the same thing nnn did. but apparently she’d rather use whatever she can to put someone down that she perceives to be on “the other side”. I used to be more argumentative, but by now I’m used to it, and for the most part I just try to ignore her.

    Eve, I try not to fight with anyone on here, but I have to address it when someone either puts words in my mouth or misinterprets my post to the point of getting angry. The funniest thing about the whole “fight” is that I wasn’t even the one that made the original comment that got her riled, I just quoted it!

  86. motheroftheyear says:

    seriously? a blue eyes debate? oh my!

    also, does anyone go to perez’s site anymore? how is this unfunny fatty still relevant?

  87. Eve says:

    Eve, I try not to fight with anyone on here…

    @ Praise St. Angie:

    I know that. Neither does nnn (fighting), she’s usually very polite and articulate. That’s why I’d hate if that happened from this post on.

    You, Liana and I tried to explain to nnn what went on (I hope she’ll read them all) — she misread the original post by Hamm and as a consequence she misinterpreted yours .

    but I have to address it when someone either puts words in my mouth or misinterprets my post to the point of getting angry.

    I understand that and I’d have done the same: being misinterpreted is one of my pet peeves.

    EDIT:

    @ junk573r:

    I don’t agree with everything you said (I mean I would not do the same thing she did) but that’s a great post.

  88. Pixie Stix says:

    Kaiser,

    Love reading this site, So, she talked to PH & now he’s not a bully? One less in the world is a good thing. Seems like Aniston distanced herself from CH when she went public about AJ. I just really don’t get your hate on Aniston 24/7 & wish you’d just fall off…otherwise, reading your blog makes my day.

  89. Laurie says:

    Her acting is flat and every character is like Rachel. I don’t love her, don’t hate her – but if she doesn’t like the spotlight/criticism, then she can take her millions and leave the industry. I read Perez and I like it when he is snarky. If I just wanted entertainment news, I’ll tune into Extra or ETonight.

  90. The Hamm is My Dream Man says:

    Hold the phone folks, jeez!

    Praise, sorry you got dragged into a silly disagreement over something I said.

    nnn, it was me who was talking TO YOU (and, incidentally, eja102), not about you. You and eja102 were saying something about how you didn’t understand why she would address him at all and not just ignore him. I was pointing out that some people don’t just ignore things and actually confront the people who are saying bad things about them.

    Eve is correct, I was addressing the two of you in order to draw your attention to a possible reason why she would say something to him as opposed to just ignoring it. I was NOT saying that you all don’t let things go.

    Again, sorry Praise St. Angie-lady you did your best but nnn was determined to find fault in you when I was the originator.

    nnn, it was me. If you want to bitch at someone, bitch at me. Even though I wasn’t being bitchy to you, I was trying to tell you that some people don’t let others just get away with things. Like now. I can’t let Praise get the crap end of the stick for something I wrote.

  91. Liana says:

    I’ve only ventured to Perez Hilton once. And seeing the pics with his immature photoshop scrawls on them was enough. I like my gossip and “dirt” with a little intelligence, thankyouverymuch. I post here and on dlisted (and my own blog, when I bother to update it).

  92. Brittany says:

    I used to go to his site every day, but his constant bullying and shit-talking of women really started to piss me off.
    He’s more than willing to demean women, but the instant someone says ANYTHING remotely bad about someone who happens to be gay, he starts throwing the “they’re homophobic” stuff out. Not cool.

    I haven’t been to his site in about two months!

  93. munchies says:

    why debate on the color of her eyes? why not her nose or chin? thats more fun!

  94. Blaster says:

    Oh Jesus Christ? Seriously? We’re having a “Jennifer wears contacts!!! Fake brown-eyed bitch!!!!!!” debate???

    Maria and all the dissenters who “don’t care” about Aniston, including you Kaiser, no matter how hilarious I think you are sometimes….

    She has blue eyes! The end. Unless her parents made her wear them since her infancy…which I doubt:

    http://www.freewebs.com/jenniferaniston248/

    Those pictures are mostly all in black and white. There is no denying that those are NOT brown eyes. Now, can this “debate” please die?

    ::crosses fingers and hopes this post is approved::

  95. Melinda says:

    Perez is so lame and really not funny at all. No worries Praise. I totally understand what you’ve been saying, you spelled it out pretty darn clear ;) Everyone just relax and have a glass of wine. Can’t we all just get along?

    Edit- Cheers to Brittany!

  96. Conando says:

    Oh Jen, I like you but you’re an idiot sometimes. He’s just as big of a lying, shady ass as he ever was.

  97. Dudette says:

    She hangs out with Chelsea Handler, the biggest “meanie” there is, and yet she thinks PH is mean? Incredulous. I can’t take this woman seriously.

  98. hyuch says:

    Kaiser, i think you need to drop the JA hate. Its getting tedious. Can you find someone else to irrationally dislike? Please?

  99. hyuch says:

    I mean, I love reading your blog Kaiser, (v. funny) but every time you complain about JA there are so many comments and its all been said before and really, there is no reason to hate JA except you don’t like her PR image. Thats ok, its not like I know any of them personally myself, but for variety can we focus on someone else unless something ACTUALLY happens in JA’s life?

  100. hyuch says:

    OMG, am I saying, in effect…”Why are you so mean?” Am I perhaps turning INTO JA? Oh well, if I get the persoanlity I hope I get Cabo as well…I

  101. Josephina says:

    Dudette- I totally agree with you!! Aniston hangs out with Chelsea in Mexico, an all-expense paid trip by Aniston, over the Thanksgiving holidays. Two weeks later, Chelsea goes in on a nasty “comic” rant about Jolie in one of her stand up comedian shows. Aniston, you are full of caca. You only have a problem with bullies that bully you. You were more than fine with your girl’s Chelsea’s repreated obnoxious remarks. So…bugger off.

    Junk5735– Some people don’t like the way Aniston handled her divorce with the public. Once Brad made it very clear that he had permanently moved on, which was back in 2005, I thought all of her quoted comments about Brad post March 2005 until the present fell into the “why are you talking about a man (or his woman) who no longer wants you as a wife, you look stupid!” category. Ergo, she became the despised third wheel.

  102. Spam says:

    Well Hyuch, it would be if it worked that way. Scroll to the top and you’ll find the motivation: Advertisments. Other celebs simply don’t generate that much hits.

    Kaiser just parrots the sentiments of the commenters above, to give the people what they want. There really is not an original thought involved. So keep expacting the same old, same old.

  103. lisa says:

    She only thinks Perez is mean because he called her Maniston. That was the problem. She didn’t mention that in her interview with Ellen.

    Perez called her Maniston. Why in the world is she reading his blog anyway. and why does she care about what this random blogger says about her. OH wait she is America’s Sweetheart. Never a mean word or thought out of her mouth. I recall some interview where she was cursing like a sailor about the Paps. hmmm wonder if they thought she was mean.

    I just find her persona made up and she to me is what she thinks the public wants her to be. So I doubt anyone really knows her at all. Well the men she has broken up with learned something.

  104. Jazz says:

    I was never a big reader of Perez, but when I checked his site a while ago, there were hardly any comments. Didn’t his site used to have 200+ comments per post? Usually, most of them were idiots going “FIRST!!!!!” and people telling him what a fat piece of shit he is.

  105. Luci says:

    I used to read Perez Hilton a loooong time ago and finally got fed up with his shit.
    After he said he was going to reform I logged in to see and now it is f*cking boring.
    I mean, for gay gossip and stuff DListed is a LOT better an actually FUNNY

    I also find it amusing that one of the worst dressed people has a fashion blog CocoPerez

  106. Liana says:

    Aniston hangs out with Chelsea in Mexico, an all-expense paid trip by Aniston
    *********

    I’m sorry, but we’re all privy to the information about who paid for what? Was that said somewhere? And how do any of us know what, if anything, was said to Chelsea Handler by Jennifer Aniston? I may work with actors, but even I’M not up their butts 24/7. I have NO idea what Edie Falco had for breakfast the other morning, nor do I have a clue what Julianna Margulies or Chris Noth did for dinner a few nights ago, and I’ve worked on BOTH those sets. So I certainly don’t know what Jennifer Aniston said to her obnoxious friend Chelsea.

  107. Scott says:

    Sounds to me like a few of you have WAY too much free time on your hands. Maybe instead of being obsessed with celebs you should turn off of your computer and go to work. You could even volunteer some of your time if you have no need to work. I certainly hope that none of you are receiving a welfare check every month and spending your time obsessing over celebs.

  108. renai(jrt) says:

    junk573, Just because we dont care for JA doesnt mean we hate her. No one can hate someone that they dont know personally. But why fault an opinion of dislike about the way someone make money. Also, you have to admit the personality that JA throws out there for us to see is a bit shallow and would support the reason Brad moved onto someone like AJ if depth was what he was after. JA should change what she is……..but not everyone is going to like that flavor of the month is all.

  109. Lemon Drops says:

    Secretly she’s just happy someone’s writing about her.

  110. Sami says:

    Perez Hilton can see straight through the evil manipulative bitch that Aniston is. And she doesn’t like people exposing her for what she is. It IS nice that at least ONE blogger isn’t licking Aniston’s anus. I think Perez is immature and spiteful, but at least he calls it (and trash like Aniston) as it is.

  111. Sami says:

    Aniston and her heartless moraless and souless fans along with that abomination of a conception Handler are the biggest bullies out there. Of course the passive-aggressive bully Aniston can’t take her own medicine back. Bullies rarely can. Shine a mirror at them and they scurry like the cockroaches they are.

  112. Sami says:

    As for her eyes, everyone knows they are truly brown. She IS Greek after all! There are even pictures of her when she was younger, e.g one of her going to her prom or a dance with her date, and she CLEARLY has BROWN eyes in the photo. She has brown eyes. Just as she has BROWN hair.

  113. Sami says:

    “There’s something really great about putting a human being in front of another human being and then the reality that those words,” she said, “even if it’s for humor or effect or whatever, there’s a human being behind all of that…”

    So she will APOLOGISE, for saying ‘retard’? Of course not. She is a massive hypocrite who forgot that, as she put it, “even if it’s for humor or effect or whatever, there’s a human being behind all of that…”.

    She is a bully heself, a passive-aggressive bitch. Evil and rotten to the core. Usually the true bullies whinge and whine when they are attacked. Like she does. Evil low heartless bullying bitch she is.

  114. Praise St. Angie! says:

    Hamm, while I fully appreciate your post, the ONLY person who owes anyone any type of apology is nnn (and the kraken) but I’m betting we won’t see one.

    but thanks for yours, all the same.

  115. skibunny says:

    @ Sami

    I think you have some anger issues. Scary!!!

  116. Sami says:

    Nope skibunny, I’m not angry at all. Just telling it like it. Sorry you can’t handle that.

  117. Majosha says:

    “She is a bully heself, a passive-aggressive bitch. Evil and rotten to the core. Usually the true bullies whinge and whine when they are attacked. Like she does. Evil low heartless bullying bitch she is.’

    @Sami: This is how I would describe a serial killer or some chick who stole my identity to buy meth. So yeah, you’re pretty angry.

  118. gg says:

    I still don’t get why people hate her – she’s done nothing wrong, is not a reprobate and doesn’t badmouth other people.

    I’m glad she asked PH that and that he actually thought about it. That is progress.

  119. Liana says:

    Sami sounds awfully familiar, doesn’t she?

    And one of the makeup artists I worked with said that she recalls Jennifer’s eyes actually being hazel. I thought they were a greeny blue. So, whatever.

  120. MNGIRL76 says:

    I love Celebitchy & D-Listed! my two favorites! I love Michael K.! I want to marry him! He is so hilarious!

  121. Masala says:

    @Liana

    I have half of a mind to believe “Sami” is actually Salem in disguise.

    And Sami dear, look at the link Blaster posted (#99). Sorry to burst your bubble….but she has blue eyes. Or just go on ahead ignoring proof.

    ::kanye shrug::

  122. _Salem_ says:

    Whats it to you who Sami is, Masala. And you are wrong. Those photos clearly prove her eyes are brown. Sorry that you don’t like the facts. Oh and Majosha, don’t describe yourself like that.

  123. Masala says:

    “Those photos clearly prove her eyes are brown. Sorry that you don’t like the facts.”

    ::sigh:: Head. Desk.

    @ Salem: Just swap out “brown” for “blue” and you’ve got my response to you. I give up, hahaha. There really is no point.

    Ps,
    And really? That comeback? #tryagain

  124. Anon says:

    Wow – people (including Kaiser) are awfully quick to comment on something and find fault here – particularly when it comes to Aniston.

    Ellen brought up the Perez meeting and asked Jennifer to explain it. Perez posted on his website about the meeting and explained that it occurred 5 months ago – as in long before the gay bullying incidents and his decision to start changing his attitude. Coming from someone who has repeatedly trashed Jennifer over the years, he said the meeting was lovely, she calmly asked him why he acted as he did on his blog, and said that despite him thinking of her as a character, his comments had an impact on those they targeted.

    So for all of you claiming her to be a famewhore and using this story to garner attention, etc. – apart from her appearing on Ellen as promotion for her movie (something all celebs do when promoting a film), she has kept her meeting with Perez a secret for 5 months, and the only reason it came out now was because Perez himself told Ellen’s producers about it and that it was the impetus for him to start examining his own behavior and words.

    Likewise, a mean and nasty blogger and an insult comic are two very different things. However, if someone who has found themselves at the butt of a comediennes jokes takes issue with that, they should stand up for themselves – I see no reason why Jennifer is meant to be held responsible for the words and actions for her friends. There is no proof whatsoever that Handler’s comments about Jolie or others have anything to do with Jennifer – particularly since they long predate their friendship. Jennifer certainly isn’t responsible for anyone’s professional decisions other than her own.

    And for those still harping on the “retard” remark, fine if you want to be upset about it, but at least get it straight in terms of what happened. She called herself a retard, saying “I pretend and dress up for a living, like a retard.” Technically speaking she is using the word in its correct context and meaning here – it means someone who is stupid, a fool, etc. (check a dictionary). So she is saying I play dress up for a living like a fool. Would it have been more appropriate for her to use another word here – sure. But was she using the term as a slang against someone or to put down someone with mental handicaps – no.

    For all the claims of how Jennifer is being sanctimonious or hypocritical, an awful lot of the comments here more accurately fall into that category than anything she has ever said or done.

  125. Majosha says:

    @Salem/Sami: That is easily the worst comeback I’ve ever read/heard in my life, and that’s saying a lot. But then again, you’re just another nut wielding more rage than brains so I’m hardly surprised.

  126. _Salem_ says:

    Not a comeback, just the truth. What you see is a reflection of yourself. You need help yourself. Go and get your next hit of meth. You sound like you’re due for one.

  127. Pow! says:

    Whoa boy…this just got weird. The crazies come out at night!

  128. Majosha says:

    @Salem: You’ve officially crossed into comedic territory now. Keep it up, please! Your last comment had my coworkers and me howling with laughter. :lol:

  129. animac says:

    he is because..he is butt ugly?!

  130. Trippin says:

    How hypocritical, why doesn’t she ask her old wino buddy Chelsea Handler why she’s soooo mean? JA’s a Hollywood phony. I think everyone has a bit of a mean streak and likes gossip, hence this site being so popular. I too am offended she used the “r” word and never owned it. By the way toooo old for the ponytail look. She is starting to look like a boozer, some women’s faces get a little masculine looking—See Lindsey Lohan.