Reese Witherspoon’s wedding photos in People: tacky or romantic?

Back when we reported the news that Reese’s wedding was about to happen, I said I would love to see some photos. Given how private Reese is, I expected her to release a single posed wedding photo, probably through the Associated Press, and to be done with it. Reese has a whole photo spread coming out in this week’s People, though, and they just put the cover online. This confuses me for several reasons. First of all, it’s Monday and we usually don’t see the magazine covers until Wednesday. (Kaiser reminds me that they did that last week with Elizabeth Taylor’s memorial issue.) Also, it doesn’t seem like Reese at all! This is a move that “stars” like Carrie Underwood and Hilary Duff make. This isn’t something that an A-lister like Reese needs to make public. Did she get a payday for this photo spread and is she going to donate the money to charity? She doesn’t have to or anything, I just don’t get it!

Reese Witherspoon’s country-elegant March 26 wedding to Pennsylvania native Jim Toth, 40, mixed her Southern roots with inspiration from her 1920s ranch estate.

“Timeless California architecture, rustic materials and beautiful gardens,” says a pal, gave the actress the perfect storybook setting for her special day in Ojai, Calif.

Wearing a custom-designed Monique Lhuillier blush-hued gown with a Chantilly lace corset bodice and full tulle A-line skirt, Witherspoon, 35, “wowed,” says a guest. “She took your breath away.” The gown was adorned with a double-face silk satin ribbon with cascading silk flowers, which matched the dress of Witherspoon’s daughter Ava, 11, who served as maid of honor in her own custom Lhuillier.

The bride changed into a second Lhuillier design – a white silk minidress with a party skirt – for the reception.

“There was a real family feel,” a guest tells PEOPLE. “There was so much joy in the room and a lot of laughter,” adds another.

For exclusive photos of Reese’s wedding – and all the details of her emotional, joyful ceremony – pick up the new issue of PEOPLE, on newsstands Monday!

[From People]

There are more details of Reese’s semi-rustic kind of country-themed outdoor wedding in this earlier story. I’ll buy this issue tonight if I can find it in stores. I’m really looking forward to seeing Reese’s wedding photos, and I’m especially interested in the decor and feel of the reception. Still, I’m kind of shocked that she went this route. Maybe Jim convinced her to do it for her career. He does work for Creative Artists Agency after all.

Reese’s dress is pretty and I love her simple hair and makeup, but why can’t we see her new husband at all? Also, why did she wear a blush gown? Is she so traditional that she feels she doesn’t deserve a white gown for her second wedding? I still really like Reese, but this People cover doesn’t seem like her to me, nor does the fact that she’s been hanging out with Chelsea Handler. Congratulations though, and she’s definitely pleasing a lot of fans. Reese is currently promoting Water For Elephants, out April 22, and this ties in nicely with that. Kaiser reminds me that Reese’s last movie bombed (remember How Do You Know? That was all she put out last year) and that could also be motivating her to go public with her wedding photos.

Here’s Reese out shopping on 3/24. This was before she got married. Credit:




You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

90 Responses to “Reese Witherspoon’s wedding photos in People: tacky or romantic?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lenn says:

    Maybe the agent husband had something to do with it?

  2. Marjalane says:

    Blech. I think she looks EXACTLY like Carrie Underwood in that pic. This better be for charity, because otherwise I’m ashamed of her.

  3. Cletus says:

    Good god, she looks awful in those jeans. Her legs look about 5 inches long… she looks like what -I- look like in skinny jeans, and it’s terrible. It’s really not good.

    And when I say that, what I mean is no es bueno.

  4. zxc says:

    Tacky as hell. Is she wearing prom dress?

  5. mln76 says:

    I think the whole thing was timed to sell her movie. The fact that instead of honeymooning with her new hubby she was clubbing at a pap friendly location with the tacky Handler and now selling her wedding pics screams desperation. She needs Elephants to be a big hit I guess but I thought she was classier than this.

  6. malachais says:

    ehh, I was hoping she wouldn’t. Seems like most people that have wedding photo spreads in People get a divorce.

  7. mia girl says:

    Whatever the reason(s), I don’t mind it.
    I rarely buy People, but will buy this issue to see all the wedding photos.

    Saw her last night present at the ACMs and she looks great. Marriage agrees with her.

  8. l says:

    Blush dresses are really in for high end bridal. So I really like it. Plus I do feel like she was thinking, hey I have 2 kids and have been married before-the jig is kinda up you know?
    Still….weird for her.

  9. tango says:

    I don’t know. I’d have to see more wedding photos to know for sure, but from the front cover, I’m underwhelmed. Why’d her boyfriend cut his hair so short? I like the look generally but it’s not how he normally wears it so that’s weird. And I don’t think Reeses hair looks all that great. Nice to see a non-white dress for a second wedding but I need full length photos to know if it really is a prom dress.

    I’m more interested in Ashley Judds “shocking” memoir. Is she finally going to admit what a big bitch she is?

  10. brin says:

    I love her so she can pretty much do no wrong in my book. As long as she is happy, that’s what matters. She looks lovely and happy.

  11. sydney says:

    White dress — tacky. His hair/head — tackier. He should have shaved completely or grown some hair. Good luck to them. He comes across like a self-important a$$hole.

  12. Quest says:

    I like Reese and wish her all the best, she deserves to be happy.

  13. Disbelieving says:

    Sandra Bullocks ill-fated wedding to the d-bag was a full spread and she isn’t the type, according to your criteria–A-list, private person–either. I guess they put this down to positive press that they can control.

    Reese needs to lay off the bleach. That hair is deep fried to a crackly crunch and is washing her out. And let’s not even go there with the groom’s stubble head….

  14. Theresa says:

    I agree that this move is a business one, as well as for pleasure.

    She’s on the decline, not for lack of talent, but ’cause that’s how the cookie seems to crumble in Hollywood. She doesn’t give a rats ass if some would criticize her playing of the “game, she’s using whatever assets she has at her disposal. And with a business savvy husband, who I am sure has lots of advice and strategies, she will probably be doing a lot more of this in the future.

    I just hope that when the time comes, she recognizes the futility of it all and resists hanging around too long (*cough cough, Jennifer Aniston) playing the romantic lead. I think she would do a bang up job behind the camera. Perhaps there is a second career in her future??

  15. guesty says:

    The dress is beyond fug. She does a good job of portraying herself as a good girl but IMO it’s just a persona. She’s on the stroll just like everyone else.

  16. EdithP says:

    I know so many love her, but I just don’t. I think she’s a good actress, but from what I’ve read at other gossip sites, Reese is not nice. Now of course, that’s just gossip, but still. I think this publicity is pretty convenient for her new movie.

  17. becky says:

    ok, question:
    suppose that Reese, known to be a very smart, pragmatic and ambitious businesswoman is doing ALL of this (not implying anything about how she feels about Jim) to promote her movie. why would someone who has made so much money, who has beautiful kids, a loving relationship, an Oscar, and her own production company, need another 20 million $ paycheck????
    isn’t she super rich and in production now anyways? how much does it even add to her net worth? a significant amount? otherwise, why wouldn’t such a private person need to go through these motions? is it the ego of no longer being able to open movies? i mean, everyone’s got movies that bombed! she is the ultimate perfectionist though….
    prob hates it when it’s on her

  18. sassenach says:

    It seems like she is going all out to make sure Water for Elephants is a hit.

  19. becky says:

    her thighs look really great in those jeans

  20. Diane says:

    Ditto Tango: I’m way more interested in what’s up with Ashley Judd. Reese disappoints.

  21. tapioca says:

    Well, she’s about 15 years too old to truly pull off that cutesy look, but since she’s Reese Witherspoon she could have worn a homeless guy’s jawbone like a tiara and I still would’ve thought she looked adorable. (Though not quite as a adorable as her daughter will have been in the same dress.)

  22. mia girl says:

    I just saw the cover of Hello magazine that also features Reese and her wedding and this cover shot is MUCH better… the dress looks MUCH BETTER and she looks MUCH BETTER.

    People’s covers always look corny and tacky…

  23. Cheyenne says:

    I thought she had more class than to hang out with a pig like Chelsea Handler.

  24. becky says:

    so why does she need this movie to be a big hit? is her company producing it? is this about burning bridges with investors? i agree with the commenter who brought up sandra bullock and called this postive press that you can control.

  25. Chelle says:

    The dress is not that bad. However, if you want to see what a really fug wedding dress looks like, check out the chick that Michael Buble recently married. To me is looks to be brothel meets petticoat junction.

  26. JuJuBee says:

    Wow she really looks like Carrie Underwood on the People cover. Good for her on picking a blush colored dress for her second wedding. IMHO, wearing a white dress on your second, third, etc…trip to the rodeo is TACKY. Especially if the bride to be already has children. Her movie needs to be profitable and it isn’t beneath Reese to do the hard sell.

  27. mln76 says:

    @becky Reese hasn’t had a box office hit since 2003 and hasn’t had a critically acclaimed movie since she won her Oscar for Walk the Line. And How Do You Know did so badly at the box office that people didn’t even bother to call it a bomb. I love Reese but yeah she totally needs this movie to do well.

    EDIT: If you think her wedding dress is bad you should see what she wore to the AMC’s last night.
    Reese please come back from the dark side…

  28. serena says:

    Horrible hair. I really expected something better from her. This is so boring. ugh..

  29. danielle says:

    The hello cover is better. Her hair looks SUPER blonde and the dress looks bad in the people cover. I, too was hoping to see a photo of her dress, but am surprised that she’s splashing pics all over the tabloids.

  30. mia girl says:

    Yeah. Lainey trashed Reese and her dress last night at ACMs, but I watch and saw her in motion thought she looked great. I didnt think the dress was bad at all.

  31. becky says:

    that’s still not an explanation… c my posts… she’s got a lot of other stuff going on
    wanting and needing is NOT the same. what will happen if it doesn’t? if i were her i wouldn’t even make a movie if the script wasn’t amazing. it’s not like she needs money. unless this is about validation…
    i love reese though, always have, since that movie she made when she was a kid w Mr. McCoy as her dad

  32. mln76 says:

    @mia girl sorry but the bottom of that dress made her thighs look horrible and I think Reese has a great body.

  33. Lady Jane says:

    I agree – horrible hair. It looks like a cheap blow-dry.

    She is the cover mom for carmel-highlighted, gym-going soccer moms across America. I am sure the issue will be a HUGE seller for People.

  34. kazoo says:

    the people cover is terrible.

    i don’t understand why water for elephants is being released now. i think the bad release date is definitely going to hurt its numbers.

  35. JustBe says:


    I don’t think Reese has been on a major magazine cover since the rags covered her break from Jake Gyllenhal (sp?) a few years back.

    Her movies haven’t been doing very well, so I guess she needed this cover any which way she could get it. I do think that it’s an unfortunate step that an actress with proven talent has to take. It makes more skeptical of her and less likely to to any future interviews/opinions of her seriously.

    OT: I hope you have a post about Ashley Judd’s book coming out tomorrow. The article that Mia Girl @24 posted is very telling. It looks like Ashley had a horrific childhood and there’s a lot to understand about how she got to be where she is today.

  36. OtherChris says:

    I think the whole look with the hair and the gown is a little too young for her. And she has an adorable figure, but those jeans should be a lesson to all of us: If they look bad on her, they probably look bad on everyone.

  37. mln76 says:

    @becky ITA with you that she shouldn’t ‘need’ a hit. But the way she is acting makes me think she really wants to be on the A-list and is willing to do alot to stay there…Not every actress can be a Debra Winger and walk away from Hollywood it’s more than just money it’s ego and career and I do believe that Witherspoon is really ambitious and determined to keep her status. I was actually thinking about picking up the novel so that I would be able to see this movie when it comes out but Reese is turning me off right now we’ll see what the reviews say.

  38. orion70 says:

    I don’t know about her dress but those jeans sure aren’t doing her any favors.

  39. Anna says:

    I think Reese did the People spread because she could control when & what wedding photos would be released. She somehow totally managed access to the wedding IRL so barely any photos were taken by paparazzi but she knows that the press needs some handout.

    I guess she thought these pics looked good. Whatever. I hope she is really in love with this guy and he with her. It would be so romantic. Maybe they are both gay and this is the perfect arrangement and that’s why she looks happy.

  40. albeli says:

    After her outing with Handler, nothing will shock me about Reese.

    Her skin tone looks really bad on that cover–skin & dress are pink, hair and roses are yellowish–just eww.

  41. Gabby says:

    R15, Disbelieving, there were NO photos of Sandra Bullock and Jesse James’ wedding released. It really was a private affair.

  42. OriginalGracie says:

    In all the pics of them leading up to the wedding, Reese looks genuinely in love and very happy. In fact, at no time in seeing her in pics have I seen her look so good.

    This dude must be doing something right.
    The way he treats her, the way he interacts with her kids, in bed…maybe he is the real deal.

    As far as the photos…I think even the most private star can use an occasion like this for some positive press.

    Maybe being truly in love has softened her. Made her more open.

  43. the other mel says:

    What a hideous picture! Her husband looks like a skinhead, Reese’s hair is drab, the dress color is bleh and the whole ‘selling your wedding photos’ is such a rookie move for an otherwise class act. Not impressed.

  44. just a patsy says:

    The Blush is fug. She looks like an easter egg with the pastel pink and yellow. Not a sophisticated choice.

  45. Photo JoJo says:

    Just throwing this out there as a possibility. At my second wedding, I would have gladly paid People to publish photos. My first wedding was not what I had hoped for (to say nothing of the first marriage) and the second one really was. I was so thrilled to have my family there, and it felt so much more like a celebration than the first one did.

    Maybe Reese was just really pleased to have a wedding that felt comfortable to her, and she was just happy to share. Her first marriage came about when she was pregnant with Ava and maybe the second one was more of her fairytale?

    She looks gorgeous, and I hope they’re very happy.

  46. bluhare says:

    @min76, you hit it. Lainey did a bit on this and she thinks it’s because Reese is desperate to have a hit to justify her paychecks.

    I’ve never thought Reese is the sweet Southern girl she portrays, and most of the sween Southern girls I’ve known had a raging bitch side that puts the rest of us to shame, and I don’t think Reese is an exception.

    Plus I think the cover shot is demeaning to her husband. Yes, it’s a great shot for a wedding album, but the cover of People? Makes him look like her accessory and nothing else.

  47. melinda says:

    She looks MUCH cuter on the Hello cover (thanks Mia Girl). I like the idea of going blush for a second wedding, still pretty and bridey with out being over-kill. SHe really should have done something with her hair though, anything. Those pics look like when we go for our final dress fitting with our every day hair.

  48. lucy2 says:

    The whole wedding sounds lovely, but I’m surprised she released photos. I can see making 1 photo public, but personally I don’t think I would do a whole spread and cover. I could see her wanting to have control over it, but I think it’s also an opportunity for more press.

    I can’t wait to see that movie, it looks really good and I very much enjoyed the book, so I’m hoping it’s a good one.

  49. Myra says:

    Maybe her husband shouldn’t be her agent any more. The fact that she kept him as her agent after they started dating probably wasn’t the greatest idea either.

  50. Tiffany says:

    @ Disbelieving. I don’t think Sandra Bullock had a photo spread for her wedding. There was info that was released but no cover spread. As far as Witherspoon, it goes to show that her ranking is dropping and she needs to promote outside of junkets just like B listers and below to get people into the theatre. For the people who talk about her production company, anyone can have one and continue to pay for it but it does not mean that it is successful. As mentioned, she has not had a hit in 7 years. As I said in a previous post about her, she just knows how to play the game better than most. The pretending to be annoyed with the paps but thanking God that people are still interested in her.

  51. dahlia1947 says:

    I always thought of Reese as a very classy gal, BUT, it seems that putting her wedding pics in People has definitely brought her status down a notch. Oh yeah and hanging out with Chelsea? Heard about that and I just don’t get it.

    Julia Roberts released 1 wedding pic and that was the right move. That was great even if she had or didn’t have any hits at that time. Can’t remember, but still a VERY GOOD MOVE. Hopefully this is the only tacky cover Reese does!

  52. rachel says:

    90% of the posts here reflect the shallow, ingnorant, oppressive backstabbing cultural grooming that women in this culture receive: women who get married are the biggest bitches and whores; they get a lifetime contract!

  53. garvels says:

    I agree with min76, Something is up with Reese, first she parties with the Handler skank and now she is doing a people wedding pictorial. I thought she was one who fiercely protected her privacy. I like Reese, she is a very strong woman and she is one of the few actresses in Hollywood that has real talent. She doesn’t need to play these PR games because her talent alone will keep her employed.

  54. gg says:

    Yuck – why did he decide to be Mr. Stubble for their WEDDING pictures? Bad move.

  55. Kira says:

    I guess her last movie bombing really must have hurt her self-esteem, or something? How else to explain releasing these cheesy wedding photos? And hanging out with Chelsea Handler for some PR? I hope her next movie is a hit, because it’s kinda sad for her.

  56. Disco says:

    I actually watched How Do You Know this weekend for the first time. First of all, let me say that I usually LOVE romcom’s that everyone else says are horrible (The Bounty Hunter). That being said…ummm…this movie was horrible. Seriously. I got to the end and thought to myself…I really don’t even care how this ends. Wow. And I’m super easy to please with movies. So…if they couldn’t sell me on it…yeah…it sucked.

  57. Theresa says:

    I don’t think her dress at the ACM awards is that bad. I am sure in person it is probably very pretty, the photos don’t do the lace detailing any favors.

    I also think she is pregnant. Right now. Although it is her third child, and she should be showing quickly and significantly, even for a tiny woman, I see a thickening around the waist and an attempt to wear things that cover it (notice the long shirts and sweaters she’s been wearing casually) and dresses that have more forgiving fussiness around the waistline.

    I have always liked her, especially since Election. I think her wedding dress is really cute and her and her new husband seem really a good match.

  58. nanster says:

    @Theresa – I think you’re right – she looks pregnant. She was also pregnant when she married Ryan Philippe.
    That would also explain her hubby’s haircut…they had to hurry up and get married so there was no time to let his hair grow out. ;) I have liked Reese since I first saw her in “The Man in the Moon”. I hope she’s happily married this time around.

  59. louise says:

    I’m baffled as to why people think that Reese is a delicate little flower who was forced to sell the wedding pictures by a pushy husband and that she wore pink because she’s ultra conservative and wearing white would be evil. I think it’s obvious that she did this to help promote the movie and she wore pink because she liked it. A lot of women don’t wear white for the 2nd marriage especially today since dresses come in so many colors. Women are even wearing color for the first wedding.

  60. Madison says:

    I don’t know why people are suprised by Reese selling her wedding photos to people magazine and anyone who wants them, just because she has created this public image of the nice, down to earth southern girl doesn’t mean she is. These photos are all about publicity for her next movie, celebs pimp out their private lives all the time when they have movies coming out, reese is no different.

  61. TeeTee says:

    on another note I think she is pregnant..

    maybe she just wanted to share this time…and if she is pregnant, she probably didn’t want to wear a white dress..

    she’s old fashioned, she maybe wore her fav color instead w/insistance from her mom or something.

    I still love her though.

  62. Brooklyn says:

    aaw this in CVS… thought it was one of the 16 and pregnant girls at first. cheesey cover shot much? but i am happy for reese, she’s one of those celebs you root for. she gave us legally blonde for cripes sake!

  63. Disbelieving says:

    Just to clarify: I didn’t, actually, say that SB and JJ had a photo spread but they did release a lot of personal details in the story. I remember reading how they hung a cameo (?) that belonged to her mother from a tree, etc. And she did release a picture of the dress and the story of their rings. And do I remember a picture of her ring–also, a Neil Lane, just like KatvonD? Ugh. I just meant that other A-list stars release information to try to control a positive press. I guess I am not that looks oriented as I think the planted pieces of information in the story are more personal than the pictures.

    Although, I still think her hair needs a break from the bleach.

  64. Flan says:

    She is happy and wants the whole world to see them.

    Funny how nobody else thought of that ;)

  65. courtney says:

    leave the woman alone people a second time bride isn’t supposed to wear white. besides stars have always sold wedding and first baby pictures it’s nothing new

  66. Andie says:

    I’ve never seen a movie with Reese in it, and I don’t know her as a person (obviously), but I did think she would look a little more classy than this. The pics with the tight jeans and the wedge heels are not good. NOT a good look. In defense of her hubby’s stubble headed look. He may be balding, and the fact is it’s better to shave it all off than have a dome headed look, or a comb-over.

  67. My2Lincolns says:

    should’nt he have let his hair grow out before the nuptuals? ick, looks like Reese married a skin head. yikes. gross.

  68. Anon says:

    “I’m baffled as to why people think that Reese is a delicate little flower who was forced to sell the wedding pictures by a pushy husband and that she wore pink because she’s ultra conservative and wearing white would be evil. I think it’s obvious that she did this to help promote the movie and she wore pink because she liked it.”

    @louise: I couldn’t agree more. Reese is papped on average about once a week or more – even when not filming/promoting any projects. She works out/runs in public, frequently is caught shopping in LA, and is often caught getting coffee or dining out as well. Some on here might think this is just unavoidable, but she is certainly not the top pap target and yet we often see those A-listers go months without being photographed when not filming/promoting a project. My point is that Reese is very much controlling her image – and not just with this People cover. Many gossips have said she is as Type A about this as one could be, and that her real personality is much more ruthless than the sweet, southern image she portrays.

    And for those asking why she would need to stoop to this level to promote her latest film, the answer is simple – she hasn’t had a real box office hit in 8 years. Her last picture earned $47.7 million worldwide with a production budget of $120 million – that is an absolute bomb. And for that Reese was paid $15 million. Herein lies her problem – she has long been overpaid based on her actual earnings for the studios. She very much needs to have a hit to prove she is worth the pay check she is trying to command.

    Moreover, regardless of talent or previous earnings/awards, if you aren’t currently viable for the studios, you are not going to keep being offered the best parts, nor are you going to be able to secure financial backing for your own production projects. So beyond securing herself financially, Reese needs this film to be a hit to secure her place for future work.

  69. Becky says:

    I think she looks very pretty (I love the dress and the simple hair and make-up) but I agree with everyone who said that selling her pics to People was a tacky move. Even if she donates the proceeds to charity it smells of a too obvious attempt for publicity close to the release of “Water for Elephants.” With all of her money and success, it’s sad that she feels the need to make such a personal event public. What happened to discretion? I also agree with the person who wrote that the pic makes her husband look like an accessory.

  70. Kloops says:

    Very tacky for an Oscar winning actress to sell photos of her wedding to a tabloid. Smacks of desperation and the timing is way too coincidental.

  71. OriginalGracie says:

    For me, it was her role of Jennifer in Pleasantville that made me love her.
    See also: Legally Blonde.

    She has a gift in the right role for making you totally love her.

    Also, her new husband is not her agent.
    She met him at CAA when going in to meet her own agent.

  72. Dea says:

    It really shocked me when I saw her with Chelsea Handler after the wedding. That I could have never imagined. Anyways I love these two as a couple but the resemblance of her with Underwood is astonishing here.

  73. Dea says:

    I must add she looked totally pregnant last night on the black dress at ACM.

  74. jemshoes says:

    My jaw almost dropped when I realised this was Reese Witherspoon, not Carrie Underwood! She looks elegant and happy, and it’s nice that her hubby wanted to make that particular shot all about her, choosing to obscure his face. Maybe this is the perfect shot for a People cover; after all, she’s the famous one, not him – and maybe he wants to keep it this way.

  75. lisa says:

    I too think she is pregnant which is why the wedding happened so quickly.

    Reese and all these women called America’s Sweethearts are not. They are not.

    She is doing the same stupid that Gwyneth did. Over promoting her film. She is just on too many shows. Why see her on the big screen when I can turn on any station and there she is. Just like Gwyneth Over promoting. She didn’t do that much promotion for her 120 million comedy. Wonder why?

    It just seems overkill. I didn’t read te book so I am on the fence about seeing the film. Rob does nothing for me. and the picture of Reese as a sexy seductress is hard for me to see. Maybe I’ll wait for the dvd.

  76. tengie g. says:

    It’s astonishing that people can be so mean and judgemental. How about 2 people who found love? How about she got beauty for the ashes from her marriage that burnt to a crisp? Could it be that she got a serious hunk who is obviously in to her and might make some of us think….wow wish it were me!!!!

  77. Minx2 says:

    I’ve never liked Reese. I mean, I respect her for raising her kids right and not being a total famewhore but I feel she’s a real bitch underneath the fake sweetness. She looks more and more like Carrie Underwood, in fact, she styles herself like her. As to the dress: I’m not loving it (and I hate loose hair with a veil.. if you have a veil wear the hair up or it looks randomly attached, not to mention the color is washing her out) maybe she wanted a real romantic dress this time? After all, she was very pregnant when she married Ryan so she never had the “princess” wedding. Anyway.. good luck to her, I think she’s working hard to promote her latest movie and selling pix to the tabloids is part of the plan. When the baby comes (and it will), she’ll sell the photos as well.

  78. eternalcanadian says:

    Wow, the new hubs sure shaved his hair off! :o

    I just might check out that People issue if not to see the wedding details. Looks like an all pink wedding aka Elle from Legally Blonde. :P

  79. Newbie says:

    I like her, but that outfit does nothing for her. Yikes. Love the bag, though.

  80. Oh Please says:

    @Anon & @louise
    In total agreement. She always looks for/calls the paparazzi whenever she leaves her house. She is an over paid actor who needs to justify the money she gets from her flops and she needs the press to make out she is so adored by the public.

    She is photographed every single week pimping out her kids, going to the shops/gym/getting coffee, or just conveniently jogging past the paparazzi. She is almost as bad as Jen Gardener and the playground she chooses which is obviously outside a photographers office.

  81. piedlourde says:

    Good for them, love is beautiful and all that.

    Reese seems a bit too prissy and humourless, (“vanilla”, if you will) but I can’t help but liking her because she’s the spitting image of one of my best friends.
    Same logic as with my irrational hatred of Anne Hathaway and Katherine Heigl (okay, maybe not irrational with the latter): they both resemble my childhood bully who tormented me for nine years. It’s the toothy+gummy grins and dark brown eyes… Makes me stabby! :D

  82. saucy says:

    lol at suri eyeing her approval (in the corner) of reese’s pink wedding dress.

  83. MaudeLebowski says:

    Ew, a buzzcut on your wedding day? Does he have nits?

  84. Yas says:

    I thought this was a strange move for Reese, I actually bought a British magazine to view to photos, and there’s only two of them, the cover photo and one of Reese in her dress, the spread is about six pages and they just use the same 2 photos again and again in various sizes and close-ups, all the other pictures are paparazzi pictures of her house on the day and old press photos of the celebrities who were supposed to have been in attendance. Even the text wasn’t an interview with Reese but just an account of the day according to sources and “guests”. Totally not what I was expecting!

  85. kikay says:

    I definitely agree with oh anon,@loise,her famewhoring is definitely on high alert for WFE movie.For this past few weeks she hardly stay home,i think she only goes inside her house to change then back again to be pap outside her house or somewhere in La.She is desperately holding on to be the belle of the ball that she lost 15 yrs. ago its not even funny.Fame is like virginity,once you lost it ,theres no getting it back.Ask Meg Ryan.