Angelina says she wants to raise little travelers, plus some of Brad’s W photos


Angelina Jolie has a W Magazine photo spread of intimate family moments captured by her longtime partner, Brad Pitt. The cover features a corner of her breast as she nurses one of her twins and the interview inside the issue starts with a bang, too, with Angelina talking about going to buy knives with her seven year old son, Maddox:

Every family has its unique rites of passage, those generational milestones that mark a child’s growth and remind parents of their own similar experiences, years earlier. In the Jolie-Pitt household, one such event is the day a kid begins collecting daggers. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s seven-year-old son, Maddox, like many boys his age, has lately developed a fondness for guns and knives, and Jolie proudly notes that the predilection runs in the family.

“My mom took me to buy my first daggers when I was 11 or 12,” she recalls. “And I’ve already bought Maddox some things. We take him to a special shop.” She emphasizes that the knife blades are dulled so they’re not dangerous, and that the purchases are accompanied by discussions about violence. But, she says, “we also talk about samurais and about the idea of defending someone as good. We talk about everything.”

[From W Magazine]

My son likes guns and he’s four. I’m not exactly encouraging it, but when he won a toy gun-like thing at a carnival this weekend I let him keep it. Then I kind of put it to the side and encouraged him to play with his Legos. I figure it’s easier than taking it away from him and making it seem like this forbidden toy. I can’t see specifically going out and buying him guns or knives, though. Maybe that’s Maddox’s thing. He did have a military-themed birthday party and was seen wearing a little gun necklace.

There’s a lot more in the long Angelina article, available online, including many details of their private lives. I’ll include a few tidbits below. Angelina addresses the issue of her family moving around the world and says that’s how she intends to raise her children so that they learn about other cultures. As for Roseanne Barr’s criticism of her, she says that she’s just one of many people who have opinions.

They have nannies and one live-in helper
There are nannies, of course, including the couple’s first part-time live-in helper; Jolie says she and Pitt were starting to get “loopy” while attending to the twins and trying to find enough time for the others, so for now someone stays over a few nights a week.

On her partnership with Brad: they’re in it together
“I do think that I’m good in a partnership now,” she says. “I think it just needed to be the right man.” And she believes she was correct about needing to find a shared purpose with someone. “It’s not just that I love being in Brad’s company, which obviously I do, but it’s that we both roll up our sleeves and take on what we care about in the same way,” she says. “I have a lot of respect for him, and he helps me to be better and fight hard for things that I love.”

More on how Brad convinced her to have biological children
“When we first met, he talked about having children in that way. I talked about only adopting children,” she says. After they had agreed that Pitt would adopt Maddox and Zahara, she recalls, “he stopped talking about having other kids in the other way. So I suppose in my heart I realized that he was happy with them as his children, completely. I knew he would never see them as different, and that gave me a certain peace. Then I suppose I just looked at him and loved him and just felt open to [getting pregnant]. I suddenly wanted to. It’s one of those things you can’t explain.”


Traveling around the world is how she wants to raise her kids
“We have such a big family, such a close family, that we like being with each other a lot,” she says. “We’re happy to spend a lot of time alone and meet new people wherever we go.”

“It’s part of how I want to raise them,” Jolie says, adding that they’ve shown no resistance to being uprooted. “If you tell them we’re getting on a plane tomorrow, they’re all excited to pack their bags, and if you say we’re not coming back for months, they won’t bat an eye,” she says. “I think they see the world as a home. I’ve seen Madd run through the markets of Addis Ababa [in Ethiopia] and not notice that it’s very poor, or that everyone is African or that he’s Asian. It wouldn’t matter to him.”

On Roseanne Bar: she doesn’t know me
Asked what she thought this summer of Roseanne Barr’s much circulated Internet screed about Pitt and her—an incendiary rant that mocked, among other things, the couple’s habit of earning tens of millions of dollars from violent action movies and then giving away a portion of it to convince the world that they care about humanity—Jolie appears to have no idea what I’m talking about. Told the details, she responds with a direct gaze, a calm smile and silence. Doesn’t it make her angry?
“No,” she says. “I mean, how should someone respond to something like that? She doesn’t know me. I have nothing to defend in my life. I’m sure she’s one of many people that have opinions.”

On the millions in baby photo money
“There’s nothing to say other than it’s bizarre. But we’re happy that we have our hands on it to distribute it to people we think are worthy, rather than some paparazzi.”

Angelina’s work and charity schedule will be busy
During the next few months, Jolie plans to ease herself back into the workforce. In Edwin A. Salt (which will likely be retitled), she will play a CIA officer accused of being a double agent. Meanwhile, one pet project, the long-delayed screen adaptation of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged, is coming closer to fruition: Jolie says a script is ready and discussions are in progress with various directors, including Eastwood. On the humanitarian front, the Jolie-Pitt Foundation is now building a children’s tuberculosis/AIDS clinic in Addis Ababa, similar to one it already established in Cambodia; Jolie is also eager to return to the Burmese border, where she last traveled in 2004 to visit with refugees. And this fall, when the family relocates to Germany, Jolie will bring her plane so she can start flying again.

At least one kid sleeps with them a night
“Most nights, someone ends up in our bed,” Jolie says. “They’ve just taken over in there—especially right now, because we want them to feel that the babies aren’t special in the room. So our door is much more like a swinging door.”

The Jolie-Pitt bedroom, of course, remains off-limits to journalists. And sometimes even to kids, Jolie declares.

“The kids do knock before entering,” she says. “We’ve at least got that part down. Because Mommy and Daddy need some space.”

[From W Magazine, subtitles added]

The photos shown on the W website are pretty intimate and the magazine promises to have a much larger spread. Say what you will about Angelina, she gives a good interview and is lovely photo subject. Forbes just declared that Angelina sells more magazines than anyone else in the world and the issue is sure to be a best seller for W.

The famous family is now back in Berlin holed up in a large estate. The W Magazine issue featuring Angelina comes out on October 21, right before the release of her new film, Changeling.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

43 Responses to “Angelina says she wants to raise little travelers, plus some of Brad’s W photos”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Anni says:

    i love the burger pic!

  2. dovesgate says:

    I know, it makes her look more human instead of the always serene earth mother persona. You can almost hear her say “ok babe, enough, let me eat”. I like the goofy face too.

  3. vdantev says:

    LOL, love the pix.

  4. Kaiser says:

    I like the fish-face one. She’s so cute! And yes, she gives a great interview. 😀

  5. Anna says:

    I love those pics, Brad sure can take a photograph! I also love the goofy one.
    And she looks so very young in the breast-feeding pic, it must have been a very nice moment.
    I’m still not sure why they share those private pics (I know I wouldn’t if I were them) but since they do, we might as well enjoy them.

    She does give good interviews but somehow, she does always have the same M.O. and sort of always answers more or less the same stuff. The places she mentions change a bit but other than that not much. As a journalist, I’d be a bit disappointed to get only those standard answers, I would hope to get more out of her. Then again, most journalists do ask the same questions. That’s why I always try to find questions that likely haven’t been asked yet when I prep for interviews. I always try to get the person. What Angie is giving here is the persona, at least that’s my feeling.

  6. daisy424 says:

    Black and white = classy photos, just beautiful. 😉
    The fish face is priceless.

  7. someone says:

    She shouldn’t be allowed to have children, shes a menace to society..IMO, Angelina needs some serious counceling.

  8. geronimo says:

    I love these pics (beautifully lit one of her and Maddox(?) on the W site), but I found the interview itself dull and a bit self-reverential. Maybe, as Anna says earlier, it’s the interviewer and/or what they were allowed to ask. The pics say far more than the interview anyway, maybe they should have just left it at that.

  9. Kaiser says:

    I found the interview very interesting, Geronimo. But then again, I’m not a ZOMG TRAITOR. 😆

    I didn’t know that the Atlas Shrugged thing was so far along – I really hope that the project falls through. It’s an interesting book, and it would make a horrible film, even with my girl in it.

    I also liked her answer to the Rosanne Barr question. La Jolie is so classy!

  10. geronimo says:

    😳 Yeah, sorry ’bout the ZOMG TRAITOR thing but I think they should have just gone with the pics. Thought it was very bland, something she’s not. See, I’m defending her….

  11. Kaiser says:

    @G – Forgiven. 😆 Girl’s gotta promote that movie, that’s why she did the interview. Clint’s running the show.

  12. elisha says:

    I hated the breastfeeding picture, especially how people were calling it “iconic.” Lame. But the burger photo, now THAT one’s awesome. Shoulda been the cover.

  13. kate says:

    oh yeah…those are intimate. and private. that’s why they’re appearing in W.

  14. Cheyenne says:

    @Kaiser, #9 — Have to agree with you about Atlas Shrugged. I’ve read the book — all 1200+ pages of it — and I can’t begin to imagine how they will make a 2 or even a 3-hour movie out of it without sacrificing the book’s integrity. To do it justice, it would have to be at least 10 hours long, minimum, and then you’re not talking about a movie, you’re talking about a mini-series.

  15. Zoe says:

    I wish I was that hamburger. 😳

    Also, Atlas Shrugged is a great book, but Ayn needed an editor in a big way, so I think the book will translate fine. Can’t wait! Ange will be perfect.

  16. Bess says:

    For people who are always asking for privacy, this is weird…The fact that she tries to over explain herself about the kids just loving to travel and blah,blah,blah…..sounds like a rationalization to me. She wants to be a world traveler and drags everyone around with her and her nannies and Brad. I’m sorry, but it doesn’t sound authentic to me. Not much of what she says sounds authentic. Just my opionion I realize. Ya know how if you are raised with a mom that is completely strict on cleaning constantly, you tend to raise a slob once they are out of your grip, well I bet she raises kids who aren’t secure and just want to plant deep roots somewhere in the world. Balance and moderation are not in Miss Jolie’s agenda I guess.

  17. yeah says:

    WEIRDO! John was right.

  18. Diva says:

    People keep saying “for people who are always asking for privacy” in regard to Brad and Angelina… when did they do that?

    I know their fans are often saying this, but when have Pitt or Jolie said it? They called the cops when their property was broken into, and they’ve made an issue of security where their kids are without them, like school, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen nor heard them say anything about giving them privacy.

    They know what side their bread is buttered on.

  19. Diva says:

    OHHHH, and wait’ll you see the pic of Zahara in her unders wearing mama’s heels and hat and holding Jolie’s hand… PERFECTION!

  20. Granger says:

    Agree, Diva. I don’t recall Jolie ever freaking out (a la Sienna Miller or Julia Roberts) about wanting to be left alone. IMO, she handles the massive media attention with a lot of grace and good humour.

    I don’t blame them for wanting to share some of their “intimate” photos. I post sweet, funny pics of my family on my facebook page for anyone to see, because I’m proud of my husband and kids, and proud of the photos. If I were a big celeb with tons of fans, I’d probably be happy to show them the non-celeb side of myself. But maybe I’m just horrendously vain. And god knows most actors are! (I’m not an actor, by the way… Just vain like one… 😈 )

  21. Codzilla says:

    Granger: Good point about posting photos of your family online and the JPs magazine spread. I never thought about it that way, but you’re right, it’s basically the same thing.

  22. daisy424 says:

    Good point Granger, why I sometimes put my Grandkids pics as my Gravatar icon 😉

  23. Cheyenne says:

    Granger: Very good point. Half the people in my office have photos of their children or grandchildren as their screen savers.

  24. aleach says:

    these are real private moments huh? full makeup, wearing long silk nitegowns and hanging out on a random wall with a face-painted paz, a shirtless shiloh? what the hell haha
    😆

  25. aleach says:

    i have to say that i DO love the sandwich picture…you actually see a REAL person, not a celebrity trying to be a real person

  26. jade says:

    I don’t know…These all look staged to me. They are actors after all-the business of image, no?

  27. vdantev says:

    IMO, Angelina needs some serious counseling.

    Opinions are like *ssholes, all of us have them and most of them stink.

  28. pamela says:

    vdantev,

    😆 😆 😆

  29. Kirsten says:

    I think she is lovely.

    This couple can’t win with anybody. I think she sounds like a great mother and humanatarian.

    She shouldn’t be allowed to have children? When did you become God someone?

    Sounds like she’s about the only one in the world who doesn’t need counseling.

  30. Mairead says:

    Aww vdantev – correcting Antilina spelling mistakes? You’re getting soft in your old age my dear 😛

    Ok – my take on this is, while the photos are being billed as “private” and candid shots by the magazine, it’s fairly obvious that many of these were posed images. They’re pretty light-hearted and you get to see the goofy Angie of old (along with her remarkably good skin!)

    There is a great sense of humour in them too – I particularly love the cod-“Madonna & Child with St. John the Baptist” vibe the gorgeous group shot is giving off.

    I must say – the man does have a good eye. I would say he probably takes photos of the family, because it’s next to impossible for him to take much architecture or streetscapes photos.

    Oh – and I’m going to defend colour photography here – colour slide film is one of the most perfect media there is, as it’s real light that’s infusing the pics. So neagh! 😆

  31. Tlchottea says:

    Im sorry but her comment about “to distribute it to people we think are worthy” in regard to the millions of dollars in baby pictures – I guess Americans aren’t worthy since Pitt-Jolie organization gives only to foreign countries. They also apparently only adopt children from there. There are plenty of children in the U.S. that need homes! Why don’t they learn at little from Jolie Fisher!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  32. Kaiser says:

    Is New Orleans a foreign country now? 🙄

  33. Jenna says:

    You know Kaiser, I think it is! I mean they only give money to foreign counties and all. 😆

    Well since there are so many kids in America that need to be adopted, Tlchottea, why don’t you go do it? 🙄

    Anyways, I love the fish face picture as well as the burger one. When I saw it I busted out laughing.

  34. PJ says:

    I agree the hamburger is the best pic because it looks unposed, but the goal of a magazine cover is to get people to buy the magazine. So the breast shot would get on the cover, because nothing sells magazines like sex.

    Regarding the previous posts about displaying family photos at the office, I’d just like to point out that this is a photo of a woman in her bed, in her nightgown, breast-feeding. I don’t know about others, but none of the guys in my office have photos on their desk of their wives in a nightgown, it’s just too personal.

  35. Gigohead says:

    I think the photos are cool. But I’ve gotten my fill of Angelina for a while.

    Bit of overkill if you ask me.

  36. daisy424 says:

    PJ she is sitting up in a chair nursing her infant, not in her bed.
    These photos are far from the ‘glamor shots’ some wives give their husbands.
    I see nothing distasteful here.

  37. Cheyenne says:

    @gigohead, #35: The publishers want to sell magazines. They know Angelina is the #1 cover draw. Put her picture on the cover and sell magazines. It ain’t rocket science.

    There is a remedy if you think it’s overkill: just don’t buy the magazine. (And convince 10 million or so other people to do likewise.)

  38. Clare says:

    Right of passage, knives? Freaky white trash. Then again, she just wants people to talk about her.

    Iconic? Nothing she does can ever be iconic. She is too trashy to be iconic. Like a porn star being iconic. She is just a woman who will exploit her children for some air time even when she gets too much of it.

  39. zagge says:

    i agree with claire 😀

  40. Marie says:

    So why are reading about angelina jolie– if you don’t like her? It’s not helping you but it certainly is increasing her popularity.
    The best thing to do about people you don’t like is totally ignore them.

  41. jordan says:

    there is nothing real here….she only speaks for the moment and changes her toon according….even her speech pattern is fake…has she changed her whole vocabulary……….Where is the real AJ…these kids have filled her void of loneliness she once soaked in….Can’t figure Brad at all……..

  42. Jeanne says:

    I agree with Gigohead. Enough, enough of Angelina and Brad. I can’t take much more. Must we hear about every adoption, every birth, everytime Brad rides his motorcycle, wears a new hat, Angie carries a kid, Angie and Brad’s thoughts on politics, New Orleans, World Hunger, World Peace, Obama, Angelina’s mama, Jennifer Aniston, Angie’s tattoos, and on and on! She and Brad sit on the toilet, fart, pick their noses just like the rest of us mere mortals.

  43. WTF?!?! says:

    The top pic shows her in her “standard” Madonna-working-the-lips pose and that she’s tending toward look-at-me-I’m-dangerously-skinny-again physique. Five years from now her bones will be too weak to carry the kids and she’ll be in organ failure from ketosis.

    At least her megalomania is taking on a humanitarian bent, but if you look at interviews with Josephine Baker’s kids, they grew up to hate her, acknowledging she “saved” them from poverty, but wondering if they’d’ve been happier people if she’d left them be.