Rachel Weisz in Jason Wu in Toronto: gorgeous or bland?

wenn3506538

Rachel Weisz is in Toronto too, to promote yet another new movie. I feel like she has half a dozen films coming out! This one is called The Deep, Blue Sea, and I’ll discuss it in a moment. Let’s talk about fashion first. Rachel wore Jason Wu, one of her favorite designers, to the Toronto premiere. Thoughts on the Wu? I feel like Rachel has problems with color. Sure, she looks amazing in red, but when she veers into blues, greys and greens, the shades tends wash her out? Doesn’t her skin look kind of weird here? But if you just showed me the dress, I would like it. I do love her makeup and her hair, though. All in all, not the worst look at all.

Rachel walked the red carpet with her costar, Tom Hiddleston. No Daniel Craig! BOO. Maybe they’re waiting for the Dream House premiere to walk the red carpet together. God, that will be so, so hot. I can’t wait. As for Tom – he seems kind of geeky and odd. Do you girls get hot for him? I can’t see it. As for the film, The Deep, Blue Sea is about a woman in her 40s (Weisz) who leaves her husband to embark on a torrid affair. Gee, art imitating life much? Here’s part of The Hollywood Reporter’s review:

So entirely immersive is Terence Davies’ desire to recreate and analyze the ethos of post-World War II Britain that not only has he fulfilled his ambition to refashion Terence Rattigan’s The Deep Blue Sea, but he has created a theoretical sequel to Noel Coward and David Lean’s Brief Encounter in the bargain. As intensely personal and deeply felt as it is, however, Davies’ attempt to breathe new life into Rattigan’s 1952 play is a rather bloodless, suffocating thing, lent tragic passion more by its use of Samuel Barber’s Violin Concerto than by anything achieved by his star Rachel Weisz and her leading man. Limited release in sophisticated world markets awaits.

The author of such well-carpentered post-war studies of English repression as The Winslow Boy, The Browning Version and Separate Tables, Rattigan passed out of fashion in the 1960s but, after his death in 1977, his reputation began a rebirth with Karel Reisz’s London revival of The Deep Blue Sea, which centers upon a woman, pushing past 40, who leaves her wealthy older husband for her first passionate relationship. The cast of the original London production was headed by Peggy Ashcroft, while Margaret Sullavan starred in the Broadway version in 1953 and, two years later, Vivien Leigh appeared in the somewhat sluggish but still involving first film version directed by Anatole Litvak.

In fact, the beginnings of the 1955 screen adaptation and this new one are virtually identical, crane shots that start on the street and move up and into the window of the modest rented flat of Hester Collyer (Weisz), who has just stated in voice-over that, “This time I really do want to die.” In the original, Hester is found, alive, after her suicide attempt but, here, we watch as she turns on the gas and waits for her misery to end.

Davies then flashes back to a scene that essentially recreates the ending of Brief Encounter; Hester sits, entirely bored, at home with her older husband, high court judge Sir William Collyer (Simon Russell Beale), as she silently wells while up thinking about her young lover, the dashing former RAF pilot Freddie Page (Tom Hiddleston).

As Hester recovers from her desperate act, she is tended to by neighbors, including a would-be doctor with a mysterious past, while summoning memories of her sexual awakening, leaving her caring but unexciting husband, putting up with Freddie’s emotional wavering and eventual decision to move on, and Hester’s consideration of another suicide attempt.

[From The Hollywood Reporter]

Basically, it’s a quiet period film, a throwback to the “women’s films” of the 1950s, and it’s kind of depressing. The film is getting mixed reviews. Here’s a scene:

wenn3506530

wenn3506533

wenn3506532

wenn3506539

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

23 Responses to “Rachel Weisz in Jason Wu in Toronto: gorgeous or bland?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Novaraen says:

    The bodice of the dress does nothing for her and neither does her hair and makeup. She’s usually sooooo pretty…this just isn’t good on her.

  2. brin says:

    Not full-on gorgeous but not bland either, somewhere in the middle. Can’t wait to see her with Daniel Craig on the red carpet.

  3. lucy2 says:

    It’s fine. Nothing terribly exciting, but not at all awful.

  4. tiki says:

    don’t know much about her, but she has a real face so i’m liking on her.

  5. Franco says:

    I love her so I don’t mind the bla dress on her…however, her make up is amazing, her hair though…don’t know :/

  6. Toot says:

    She looks alright, but I don’t see the this great beauty other people see.

  7. Fran says:

    Gosh I love him. Started liking him after Thor! 🙂

  8. Primel says:

    Tom Hiddleston is HOT!

  9. carrie says:

    bland look

  10. Samigirl says:

    The raspberry lip is divine. She should wear that color more often.

  11. Kiki says:

    It’s not her best look, but it’s not ugly either. I didn’t get the light-pink clutch, it didn’t help the dress situation at all.

  12. Eve says:

    Gorgeous!

  13. Cirque28 says:

    I adore her nose. It’s natural-looking, it fits with the geometry of her face, and she probably even breathes through it.

    Overall, not her best look, but still a lovely woman.

  14. Melissa says:

    Never bland!

  15. Irka says:

    Yes I am hot for Tom Hiddleston!
    Rachels dress is nice, nothing special, I kinda feel the same way about her 😐

  16. Lady Lupton says:

    Love love love Tom Hiddleston. Tom for HGF please.

    The dress is blah. Love her lip colour.

  17. jinni says:

    Love Tom, especially in Return to Cranford.

  18. Redloki says:

    Tom is hot in a geeky, British, tweedy way, not many people understand that but I get it.

    Nice pics thanks.

  19. MarieD says:

    Tom Hiddleston is a very talented actor with some fantastic qualities. Then again, I think he’s attractive enough for me to blush.

    It’s a matter of taste 😉 Lovely suit.

    Rachel looked beautiful, as well. I loved the structure of the dress.

  20. Claire78 says:

    She is gorgeous. Didn’t she used to be quite freckly?? She has always stood out

  21. sauvage says:

    Good Lord, Tom Hiddleston looks like the love child of Johnny Weir and Jamie Hince!

  22. Blithe says:

    I’m sorry, but I think jewel tones suit her muuch better. This blah-black-n-white-ensemble washes her out, imo. she looks great, though. I just hope she doesn’t lose more weight.

  23. muser says:

    She’s always looked better in brighter block colours. Still love her.

    As for Tom Hiddleston – us girls do get hot for him (or maybe it’s just me). <3 who wouldn’t want a cute, geeky guy in a suit?