Ashley Olsen explains her fear of the paparazzi

The New York Times just ran an interesting interview with the Olsen twins. The two just released their book “Influence” which is getting really good reviews. It’s about their style (and sometimes business) influences and heroes, and they’ve been doing a good deal of press – for them. While a lot of people criticized their interview on Oprah as rather dull, I thought it was interesting to see the obvious differences in their personalities. They both strike me as remarkably independent, and they seemed more self-assured than I expected.

I was consistently impressed with how well-spoken Ashley was, and she remained so in her New York Times interview. She talked a lot about the business side of the twins’ fashion lines and learning not just about designing and manufacturing clothes but also merchandising and marketing.

When they talked about some of the more traditional celebrity topics, Ashley made a few really good points about the paparazzi.

The Olsens are known for keeping a tight grip on their image, but their general reluctance to talk to the press has left them ceding ground to tabloids eager to construct the narrative. The sisters began appearing regularly in the pages of the supermarket weeklies when they moved to Manhattan to study at New York University a few years ago. The magazines followed Mary-Kate’s struggle with anorexia in 2004 and then became fixated on how the twins dressed, running picture after picture of the two in big, round glasses and loose, layered knits, implying something deranged and effortful in a look that suggested Janis Joplin.

The pursuit by paparazzi has not ebbed, and it remains a persistent source of anxiety for the Olsens. “Honestly, I’m a wreck,” Ashley said. “Every time I see a camera, I’m a wreck.” The sisters had just been surrounded by photographers in London a few days earlier. “I don’t tend to react as though ‘I have to do this, it’s my job,’ ” Ashley continued. “I am reacting as a woman who is 5- foot-1 whose space is being invaded by a bunch of men whose aggression I can literally feel.

In L.A. it is even worse because they are running red lights behind you, and I worry all the time about something terrible happening, someone getting hurt because of me, how I could ever possibly live with that. I can’t imagine what it would be like to have kids in the back seat and have to go through this and pretend for their sake that you are not scared.”

[From the New York Times]

We only see the paparazzi photographs from the perspective of the photographer. I often assume it’s just that one guy far away with a creepy telephoto lens. I forget that instead it’s upwards of 15 or 20 guys – and they are usually men – getting within inches (sometimes less) of a celebrity’s personal space. Most of us are hardwired to feel threatened, nervous, scared, or upset when anyone gets so close to us. I can definitely see why the Olsens have an annoyingly large amount of security. Even as a tall woman that would make me nervous – but Ashley is right, she’s very small and that must make her feel even more invaded.

Rarely do I feel a whole lot of empathy when celebs do the “Oh poor me, it’s so hard being famous” routine. But Ashley did a good job of bringing it down to a human level that almost anyone could understand. Now here are some photos taken by what I’m sure are the only friendly, non-aggressive paparazzi out there.

Here’s Ashley Olsen trying to escape a frenzy of photographers while leaving Orso Restaurant in Los Angeles on October 21st. Images thanks to WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “Ashley Olsen explains her fear of the paparazzi”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. drm says:

    Its easy to be snarky about the Olsen twins security, but I’m 5’3, which is taller than Ashley and I wouldn’t like it at all if someone was that close to me yelling and shoving. It does make you understand quite clearly how it makes her feel. I can’t imagine not being able to go anywhere, shopping, clubbing whatever without being swarmed…which is really what it is. Not very nice.

  2. rbsesq says:

    I agree Celebitchy, she did an excellent job of stating her feelings on the matter in terms that people (especially women) can relate to without sounding whiny about it. She certainly has a valid point. I’m taller than most men and being mobbed by frenzied men each trying to get even closer to me would certainly freak me out. I can only imagine how someone a foot shorter than me would feel.

  3. elisha says:

    Let’s see here….. nope, still don’t feel sorry for them. Paps ARE part of their job. On the other hand, Ash gets a little more of a pass because she’s sort of spurned the show biz end in favor of just plain biz. But still, she’s writing books and stuff so, no, you don’t deserve your privacy. You gave it up a long time ago.

  4. notprfect says:

    Yeah, I could see how that would suck. It’s not like the paps even give them ANY room to move when they’re chasing them down, either. I know I’d hate to be surrounded like that by people shoving cameras at me, shouting at me and taking pictures.

    I guess it comes with the territory for celebs, but the olsen twins were famous before they were even old enough to consent to being famous, so I do feel a little bad for them. Not TOO bad, though, because they’re millionaires. 😆

  5. vdantev says:

    The flash bulbs burn her paper thin alabaster skin ?

  6. actingrc says:

    I mean, I’m her size, and I have a nasty temper. i’ve kidney punched people at concerts for stepping on me or shoving me (outside of the mosh pit of course). i can see what she’s saying. it’s hard being shoved around when you’re little, and your two options are shove back which gets you arrested, or hiding. she, quite sensibly, picked hiding.

  7. WTF?!?! says:

    I second what elisha said.

  8. vdantev says:

    How about a nice cloud a military-grade mace?

  9. Moore says:

    I don’t think this level of paparazzi should be a part of the job. Yeah, when you’re promoting something, suck it up and deal with the line of photogs. When someone is on the other side of the street, or politely asks to take your pic then ok I guess but all in your face, dozens of men, aggressive and rude? That shouldn’t be a part of anyone’s job no matter how famous.
    I do wonder though. If paps started hounding Heidi and Spencer this way (without being paid first), do you think they would disappear?

  10. aspen says:

    They learned nothing after the death of Diana. Nothing.

    I honestly think any pap that chases someone in a vehicle should be charged with a felony of the endangerment or assault kind and thrown in jail.

    Until we begin doing that…none of this will change.

    I want my pictures of my celebs…don’t get me wrong. I think it’s their job to put up with the curiosity, adoration, and the public eyes on them all the time. After all…that is WHY they have millions and mansions and a life of perfect leisure when they’re not making new films.

    But people crowded around you with cameras in your face blinding you and not letting you get into your vehicle or out of your vehicle … following 6 inches behind you down the length of the street…or walking backward in a pack of 20 other people 3 feet in front of you snapping pictures and screaming your name…or god forbid at your kids.

    That kind of thing…no one signs up for.

  11. cara says:

    Did she really sign up for this? Her parents did. It must suck, I hate even being looked at, and only get my photo taken for my DL. So, I can only imagine what being in her shoes must feel like.

    Maybe she could buy a 1000 acre farm in Missori and after a few weeks, the paps would get bored and leave her alone. MAYBE

  12. Bobby the K says:

    elisha: just because a person, famous or otherwise, writes a book why does that mean they have to give up their privacy?

    and who decided that paps are part of the job, as if it was the way nature intended?

    just because there is a demand ($) for intrusive inappropriate behaviour doesnt’ make that behaviour correct.

    and i don’t agree with the mentality that just because someone is famous they owe ‘us’ anything. including their privacy, dignity etc.

  13. aleach says:

    ugh the paparazzi are so obnoxious. have you ever watched the TMZ tv show? those “photographers” say the rudest things to celebs just to get a rise out of them. but if the pap gets shoved or hit, “Im pressing charges on you!”, yet they are all up in everyones face.
    i wouldnt be able to deal with that at all.
    i need my personal space!

  14. yjiang says:

    Although I don’t feel bad when celebs who are clearly not all about just their art complain about the photogs, its sometimes different. The thing is the Olsen twins only do few movies/roles, which means that they are being selective about film and, regardless of your opinion on their acting itself, it means that they aren’t whoring themselves out just to get more roles and more money and more attention. To me, this shows to some degree that they care about the art of acting, not the fame. Also, they are often followed by paparazzi because high fashion LOVES their style and magazines will pay alot to have Olsen outfit shots because tons of people follow their style religiously. So, that’s another thing to think about…they just love fashion and happen to be extremely stylish, does that mean they have to choose fame? Once again, there’s a difference between fame whores like Jessica Alba (who does any movie she can get and usually can only get it because of her looks)who complain about paparazzi and people who just do what they love, which happens to be in an area where fame comes with it.