Oprah offends Indians with an ‘Oprah’s Next Chapter’ episode full of stereotypes

I actually have OWN, Oprah’s failing network, on DirectTV, but I never watch it. Whenever I’m flipping through the channels, it seems like OWN is just doing a marathon of some unfortunate reality show in which some overweight person is sobbing hysterically (tell me that doesn’t describe half of all reality shows). But as you might know, Oprah has her own show on OWN called “Oprah’s Next Chapter”. She does sit-down interviews (with the Kardashians, notably) and she travels and documents things and it’s pretty much an extension of her old syndicated show, only there’s no audience and no giveaways. I guess. I haven’t seen it. Anyway, over the weekend, Oprah’s Next Chapter aired an episode focused on Oprah’s travels to India several months ago for the Jaipur Literature Festival – and while she was in-country, she filmed a “This is what India is like now” episode. And Indians are PISSED.

Oprah Winfrey charmed her Indian audience when she came to the country earlier this year on a tour that included a brief appearance at the Jaipur Literature Festival. But now the show she was working on has aired, the spell appears to have broken.

The smell of incense (tick), the sari fitting (tick), the aspirations of slum dwellers (tick), and the glitz of Bollywood (tick). Let’s not forget arranged marriages and the fact that Indians, even rich ones, “still” eat with their hands (tick, tick).

India as Westerners imagine it, one stereotype at a time.

This is how many in India responded to the two India-focused episodes of her primetime series “Oprah’s Next Chapter,” which aired over the weekend. In India, the people she interacted with ranged from a family of five living in a 10-foot-by-10-foot room in a Mumbai slum, to Bollywood aristocracy, Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan. While her show mainly targets a mainstream American audience, many criticized Ms. Winfrey for choosing to project such a caricaturized image of India to the world.

“The avg American thinking of India as a place with snake charmers and elephants as main mode of transport, I can understand. But Oprah???” said user Nandita Iyer on Twitter.

“Honestly, this Oprah winfrey has made such a royal fool of herself with this,” she added. “An unflattering, outmoded, selective and clichéd representation” of India, is how one commentator, Gargi Gupta, described the first episode of the television show.

Camera shots of “roadside cows chomping on garbage and roads choked with traffic,” are just some aspects of the show that Ms. Gupta said may make Indian viewers “groan.”

The show wasn’t a complete write-off for Ms. Gupta, however. She found Ms. Winfrey’s approach tactful when she asked slum dwellers about their hopes and fears. “It suggests a respect for human sensitivities that television anchors in India… would do well to learn,” she writes in a piece published in the Business Standard.

Not all were so kind. For Rajyasree Sen, the show didn’t have a single redeeming feature.

“Myopic, unaware, ignorant and gauche. This was Middle America at its best worst,” wrote Ms. Sen of the show’s first episode in a column on Firstpost.

She found Ms. Winfrey’s comment on Indians still eating with their hands particularly offensive. “I don’t know what people in America are eating their hot dogs, pizzas and tacos with but perhaps Oprah’s home has evolved cutlery for all that,” she writes.

Many on Twitter agreed. “You still eat with your hands? – The shocking arrogance of a clueless rich woman,” wrote Aseem Chhabra.

In her criticism of Oprah’s slum tour, Ms. Sen takes it a little far. She slams the talk-show star for avoiding “any mention of the massive LCD TV” which adorned the tiny home. “That would have killed the sob story,” she adds. (The message here seems they are poor but not that poor we should be feeling sorry for them.)

[From The Wall Street Journal]

Eh. I haven’t seen it, and while it does seem like Oprah was focusing on the “stereotypical” images of India (the slums, Bollywood, saris), a lot of India is actually like that. Like America, India has an extremely diverse and pluralistic culture. It’s not all Riki Tiki Tavi, beggars and the Taj Mahal. There’s a growing (and thriving) middle class, lots of Westerners, Asians and Middle Easterners living and working in the major cities, and a huge, American-esque income disparity between the richest and the poorest. But yes, saris! Snakes! Eating with your hands! I don’t get why that one is a big deal – is that even a stereotype about Indians? We eat with our hands? Some foods are meant to be eaten with your hands. Is that a big deal? Whatever, Opes.

Photos courtesy of Oprah, WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

47 Responses to “Oprah offends Indians with an ‘Oprah’s Next Chapter’ episode full of stereotypes”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jackie O says:

    not surprised. seems she was forced into this rehashing of her old show to help ratings, and she is so over it, and it clearly shows.

    • corny says:

      to her credit, she keeps plugging away and to my credit, i just umplug..no problem

  2. Po says:

    It’s not that big a deal. What is a big deal is the fact Oprah has put herself in the line of fire of every critic with this ridiculous network when she could have retired on a high note. Instead she’s interviewing Kardasians and begging for viewers on Twitter. Embarrassing.

  3. marie says:

    Well, this hype will get Oprah some publicity/viewers for this particular episode, not sure about the rest of the season though.. And I always forget that I get the OWN network..

  4. Crystal says:

    I can see where people would be pissed off tbh.

    I know it gets on my damn nerves when documentaries feature a bunch of white people in Africa and they show the stereotypical images of us. People will complain about being ‘too PC’ but I know what it feels like when people go to my country and make us look like savages so I can see where these people are coming from.

    /kanyeshrug

  5. teehee says:

    Well the people seem to be reacting almost as though they are ashamed and as though they want to be seen like every other country. I dont get that. She seems to have highlighted what is unique in India, which is ok, unless they really are so disgusted with their past identity and so enamroed with a “modern industrial” one— one that I would hardly call enviable.

    • Autumnleaves says:

      Agreed.

      And let’s face it, India is one of the most color struck, racist country towards blacks do there righteous indignation and offended reaction is not surprising because Oprah is still a black woman in which most East Indians look down upon.

      • Diana says:

        Have you any idea what you are talking about? What is ‘East India’? Do you mean North East? Dont you have North – South divide in US? Do you call that racism or regionalism? What do you mean by ‘Blacks’? Do you mean South Indians? Please educate yourself before you generalise an entire country.
        I agree India is diverse with many regions, religions, colors and what not. And that is the beauty of India. I m an Anglo Indian, one of the few dwindling species and have travelled throughout the country my entire life and still have so much to learn about it.
        And Indians are VERY hospitable. Do you know of any single instance in the Indian media or individual comments where Oprah has been singled out for being BLACK?

      • idk says:

        Ummm excuse me but did you watch the episode? They treated Oprah like a Queen the entire time she was in India. The fact you’re lumping all Indians together in one category makes you sound ignorant. And I guess you think all black people are not racist right? There are racists in every culture !!! They love Oprah in India, in fact she got treated BETTER in India than she ever has in America. Next time, do your research first.

      • pj says:

        You obviously didn’t watch the episodes or even read the article. Where does it state Oprah was treated poorly by Indians? She was treated amazingly well while in India. Like royalty. You, my friend, are the one who sounds racist.

      • IamACylon says:

        @PJ
        I have not read the article but implying that somebody is racist because they do not agree with your shiny opinion about India is racist. You discount the experience of many people. At first I did not believe the stories friends and family members told me . I was shocked when I moved to London and experienced the same shit. I was reduced to tears and have been treated like shit. Being bullied and treated like an ‘Untermensch’ because of the colour of your skin is horrible, degrading and nasty.
        English is not my first language and the post made me quite emotional. I do not want to come across as stereotyping Indian people. I do not believe in ‘A People’ but in ‘PEOPLES’ as in Some but not all (R.A.Wilson).
        I also believe that racism exists in all colours.

      • idk says:

        autumnleaves sounds racist

      • pj says:

        @IamACylon

        Please go back and read what I wrote and read what the poster I was replying to wrote. SHE is the one grouping all Indians into one big group by saying MOST Indians hate black people. That is a HORRIBLE generalized statement to make, don’t you think? How am I racist for pointing out HER racism???? That’s ridiculous. Racism exists in ALL races. You can’t judge an entire race by the actions or words of a few.

        |Also, how am I discrediting anyone’s experience? My post was ONLY about OPRAH’s experience in India. Did you watch Oprah’s show when she went to India or even read this article? NO. She was treated really really well while in India, so it’s ridiculous how anyone can say Indians don’t like Oprah and are racist towards all Black people. That’s illogical and narrow minded.

    • Diana says:

      I take offense to your statement. So if an Indian criticizes a Western show for what he/she finds an inaccurate portrayal, it means he/she is disgusted with Indian identity? Many people do visit India and talk about the ugly underbelly of India. And believe me Indians are on front lines to criticize themselves. I have not seen the show and so I cant pass any judgement but I think you sound very condescending.

      • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

        I think we’re talking about more than one thing, here and they’re at odds. We have:

        The rich foreigner making proclamations
        The ‘Celebrity Trumps All’ factor
        The long history of color consciousness

        Crystal made a good point upthread about the exploitative nature of foreign aid ads, though I’d argue it’s worse for those cases because it’s constant, it’s the only images we ever get to see and it’s always framed as black derelicts needing to be saved by western wealth. It’s benevolent and so tired at the same time. We hate to watch people engage in the ugly American routine or the ‘omigosh, lookit that’ behaviour and if we’re perceiving it is makes us bristle in the same way that we would if someone made a crack about a family member. It gets totally enervating to watch the same scenes play out over and over again and it’s especially aggravating to that ‘your country, by the (our) numbers’ machine when someone in the know objects because it’s regarded as being humourless, scolding and airless.

        A lot of tensions are easy to forget when a mega celebrity who is also a guest is around. I don’t think the hospitality was insincere or a ploy for the cameras, but light skin is highly prized and skin bleaching there–like everywhere else, it seems–is prevalent. I’m not supporting whatever reductive tomfoolery appeared in the specials as I’m sure a lot of cultural faux pas were committed in the name of ‘bringing lazy understanding’ to the west, but it’s also true that it’s easy to be nice to someone if you know that person is leaving. But that’s not unique to one area or culture at all and the world’s always changing.

        Semantically speaking, blacks can’t be recist, but bigotry, prejudice, stereotyping, discrimination–unfortunately that’s all alive and well. The training in self-hatred running in tandem with widespread discrimination has made a war in relations between blacks and caused some self-isolation from other groups on the assumption that ‘they wouldn’t like us, anyway’, which is a sad and self-fulfilling way to live. Always some reason we aren’t good enough–to and for ourselves and everyone else. It’s a shame. We’re using traditions and institutions to innoculate ourselves from the out on display goodness of others.

    • erika says:

      someone warned me before I traveled to India that an acronym for India is ‘I’ll Never Do It Again’ (India) because the country (in big cities most) is chaotic crazy but with amazing colors. Literally every other 5 seconds something else is thrown at you (sharing the road with elephants, motorpeds, overcrowded buses and i saw one woman laying at the side with blood dripping down her forehead! It’s NUTS, but I LOVED IT! it’s a super intense place to travel IF you like that. I imagine Mdlle. Oprah, non, she did not like and took the easy way out of reporting by going for the obvious stereotype.

      but…there are BIG changes happening..high tech is HUGE (like Silicon Valley) in Bangalore, Bollywood, in Mumbai, that industry creates MORE films per year than America, europe, and Oz COMBINED! but contrast that with people live like they did 200 yrs ago in the rajasthan (women wear saris and seen down in the river banks in gorgeous sari’s handwashing laundry)

      it’s crazy beautiful. shame, with ALL her $$$ she couln’t capture that.

      what i’m saying is, from the top, penthouse view of the city’s 6 star hotels…(where Opie stayed at i guess) i can see how she’d have that kind of stereotype..

      • Molly says:

        Wearing Saris is not an outdated “200” years ago thing. My mother wore them for her wedding and continues to wear them all the time for special occasions. Saris are a part of our culture, and we will not stop wearing them despite the fact they were worn “200” years ago. I agree with everything you said, but just wanted to point that out.

  6. Leen says:

    The whole ‘eating with your hands’ thing is quite arrogant and gives me the GOOP vibe. I mean it’s insinuating that ‘only’ indians eat with their hands or something. I guess Oprah eats her burgers, pizzas, chicked fingers, etc with her cutlery then.

  7. Holl says:

    I’ve been to Mumbai for work when I was working with an International Bank and I can assure you, it has the absolute best in some areas and absolute worst! You can be staying in the most beautiful hotel and a few blocks down the same road there are dead bodies in the alley and people are going to the bathroom in the middle of the street. It a rich culture but it is also a developing country and in 50 years it may have a lot of its problems nipped in the bud. Remember the US wasn’t so great in the early 1900s either. The people are super friendly though, just great people. The worst country I visited when I had that job was Egypt only because of the intense, blatant sexual harassment in public no matter what you wear.

    and the eating with the hands thing… people do it here too. Usually when you eat with your hands in other cultures you use bread as your cutlery, like scooping the stew with bread. It works.

  8. fabgrrl says:

    Of course you eat *some* Indian food with your hands. Have people never seen Indian food? Last time I was at a office party here in Hometown, USA everyone was scooping up salsa and dip with chips, with our HANDS, and no one seemed to mind. Same thing! Mmmm…I could seriously go for a slice of hot naan and a scoop of palak paneer right about now.

  9. Amea says:

    I haven’t seen this either, but from what was written it sounds like she just wanted to portray the “cool” things about India that makes it diverse–I put cool in quotations because Kaiser, someone who is half-Indian (not sure if you identify as fully Indian or not–just remember you saying you’re half-Indian! The point is you’re familiar with the culture) doesn’t see things like saris as a big deal, but to people who don’t know anything about India, those things seem cool. I don’t think she meant to be offensive by showing the saris and Bollywood and snakes; I think that was actually meant to be educational. I do however think it’s important for ANYONE visiting another country to DO THEIR RESEARCH and become as familiar as they can with the customs from the foreign country. This way they can even draw similarities between their native culture and the foreign culture in order to avoid an arrogant “Well in MY country we do this” attitude, or in Oprah’s case, “Y’all do THIS in this country??”

    My parents are Cameroonian, and if she went there I would want her to show the Makossa dances, the unique foods (that they also eat with their hands), the crazy traffic, the people living in Beverly Hills mansions and the people living in slums. It’s still educational, if presented in the right way.

    But I can understand the irritation over the rich clueless Westerner making comments about things that happen in India (eating with their hands) when the SAME things happen in America, too.

  10. TheOriginalKitten says:

    Why are they behaving as if one failing show is the Indian “ambassador” to the US? They understand that nobody really watches the OWN network right? If you want to learn about India, I’d suggest watching a BBC documentary, not some Oprah fluff.

    BTW, I eat food with my hands all the time, otherwise I use chopsticks because I love them and because I’m weird. It’s not a big deal.

  11. Nev says:

    I watched it and found it to be a beautiful and informative episode.

    to me there was no offense at all.

    much ado about nothing.

  12. idk says:

    I saw both episodes when they originally aired over a month ago. I have been to India many times as that’s where my roots are…and what she showed is EXACTLY what India is. She showed both rich and poor, she talked about arranged marriages, she talked about the inequality women face there…IT’S ALL TRUE. What I found amusing is that she didn’t really get to experience India the way a “normal” person would. A normal person doesn’t get that sort of royal treatment in India, the way she did. They treated her as if she was a Queen wherever she went. Anyways, the episodes were not offensive to me and really depicted how India is. People living in India can complain all they want, but they are the ones being delusional.

  13. claire says:

    I don’t know. I guess I see both sides.

    I knew someone, white, middle class from the US that went there for a year for work. Would only post “slum” and “cows eating in alley” photos, or blog about all the American things, like basic necessities, that they were living without. Totally acted like they were living in some super underdeveloped place. Drove me nuts, because the city the person was in has fancier shopping malls than the average one in America. But I guess that wouldn’t fit with the “image” they were trying to project about the country.

    Some people are just hung up with India being one-note, and it’s certainly not. It’s insanely diverse. And yes, my Indian ex pretty much ate most things with his hands, that I wouldn’t have considered was eat-with-hands-type food, which was a bit to get used to, but in his area, eating with hands off banana leaves was common. But that’s one area, and that area is kinda more known for that. Sounds like Oprah made a faux pas, in having her blinders on about India’s diversity. But the critics shouldn’t try to hide the slums – they are there. And it’s awful. And the focus on arranged marriages? Well, of the appx. 15 Indians I have as acquaintances and friends, only one was not arranged to marry. It’s still alive and well, and what’s the shame in it? It’s a super different practice than what Americans have, or many countries have, so of course I’d expect to see it mentioned on a show that is covering the culture of India.

    I guess I’ll have to see the show to determine if its cringe-worthy, or someone is overreacting.

  14. Messenger says:

    miss o was so “O”ver five years before her show ended. she was phoning it in then and her network, magazine and lifestyle “chats” are just more of the same derivative hooey. she looks bored with her life, proving once again money cannot buy happiness. she is an empty vessel. deal with it o.

  15. Sumodo1 says:

    Girl done lost it.

  16. Riana says:

    It happens.

    There’s a certain arrogance of Western Cukture that assumes everyone from a foreign land (specifically regions such as African and India, this doesn’t typically old true for Asia) as being some backwards, lost, people still stuck in the 14 century.

    Whatever you may agree with a culture or not it is important to break the stereotypes which have been perpetrated that ultimately hurt any dialogue between people. If someone was to do a documentary on blacks and focused nearl entirely on ghettos and fried chicken the offense would be the same.

    Instead Oprah ignored some really interesting aspects for a continuation of the ‘Oh my goodness, you poor creatures!’ storyline.

  17. Mira says:

    Here goes the defensive Indian attitude! It was the same or perhaps even more when Slumdog Millionaire was slammed in India as poverty pron. Well, ahem, that’s the truth of Mumbai. Any thinking person in Mumbai will know and acknowledge the dreadful living conditions there. Not to forget the massive urban economic inequality which is the biggest characteristic feature of all major cities in India. I wish the same “elite” Indians such as Aseem Chabra, Shoba De, Rajyasree Sen et al made the same noise against poverty, living conditions in Mumbai, economic inequality etc in India and support local organizations that are struggling to build local-level responses, because hey, not everything can and should come from the top (government). India is a huge country that requires people participating in changing conditions around them and not just point the finger at the government.

    Of course, why will De or Chhabra shout their mouth off otherwise? They are the middle class/upper middles class section that has benefited from the economic boom since India opened its markets. They continue to benefit from the “6-8 percent” GDP growth! They are better off shouting at Oprah or Danny Boyle. Poverty is the reality of India. No point in being defensive about it. For a lot of foreigners, India is a HUGE cultural, financial shock that they are either enamored or turned off by it all. Oprah is no exception. Eating with hands – of course she’ll talk about it because unlike certain foods that’s eaten with hands in North America, most home-cooked food in India is eaten with hands. Piss off if she has talked about it in a derogatory way or if she’s reinforcing stereotypes. Don’t jump on someone just because they are showing some cultural aspects of India.

    “Roadside cows chomping on garbage and roads choked with traffic,” are just some aspects of the show that Ms. Gupta said may make Indian viewers.” – Hello, that’s the reality! Nothing about it is caricature. It’s the India reality because of lack of urban planning, which has to go hand-in-hand with the massive GDP growth. But the middle class is so obsessed with the word “GDP growth” that all they can see is their prosperity. And they equate their prosperity to surroundings around them. The Indian middle class should come out of its GDP bubble and see the other India, 60 percent of which hasn’t benefited from the two-decades economic growth. No wonder people like Sen et al can’t understand why Oprah focused on the road chocked with traffic. Get out of your air-conditioned cars and walk a block or two in Mumbai. You’ll know why the roads are chocked with traffic!

    • Diana says:

      Sorry for the double post!

      • Mira says:

        Diana, you do know that Roy is loathed and hated by middle class capitalist India? Her opinions are slammed even before they are voiced. I love Roy. I don’t agree with everything she has to say but she’s definitely the voice of reason that is shunned by the booming Hindu middle class. Medha Patkar – who’s blocking her fight against the construction of the dam and displacement of people? Corporate, middle class India.

        Of course people criticize and question the social, economic and political conditions, but why the defensive attitude when it’s highlighted by someone from outside? Right to express – yeah, these are the things that people like De express their opinions about. Sorry, but nothing pisses me off more than these useless elites taking to twitter pretending to represent majority of Indians. They would do well to get off their high horses and do something about the living conditions in Mumbai instead of crying over every little thing that’s said about India.

      • Diana says:

        Again I agree with you. And you appear to be far more knowledgeable than me in this subject.
        May be this defensiveness is the remnant of colonialism, a sort of fear that the West is trying to subjugate the country culturally in a modern day media warfare.
        I love Roy too. But I do not agree with all her views. Same with Medha Patkar.
        May be I ll try to find the Oprah show on YT and see for myself. Nice meeting you around 🙂

      • Mira says:

        Diana, I’m not sympathetic to the “colonial legacy/inheritance” argument that’s often made. It’s plain defensive attitude, imo. It’s like I can say anything about my family but no one else can. I haven’t seen the Oprah show but these reactions are cliche and by the same set of well-to-do people masquerading as scholastic social commentators. I won’t dismiss them entirely, but these reactions are uncalled-for.

    • Diana says:

      Hi Mira,
      ITA. I have not seen the show so I dont have any comments on Oprah. But Slumdog Millionaire was a great movie and ironically it was criticised by Amitabh Bachchan, whose family is hugely supportive of Oprah.
      Anyway I just want to add something. Not all Indians are living in a great dreamland of shining India. There are also equally tough critics like Arundhati Roy, Brinda Karat, Medha Patkar etc., who try to portray the real India. And many of the Indians frequently criticise India in public fora, which is a good thing and which is what you and I are doing. And I m sure only a small minority found Oprah objectionable, it is not even a major newsitem in India. And I guess they had a right to express themselves.
      Overall I am always grateful my ancestors chose to come to a country with such liberal values and great heritage.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      Very interesting post.

    • Judy says:

      I watched the Oprah show about India. I have been to India four times. I have lived there for 5 months, this was the longest stay. I have visited about 5 cities. When I go to India, I am not looking for the things you would easily find in the western world. I am more interested with Indian rich heritage, the culture…the spirituality etc. I lived mostly among the villagers, and I have to say that they are saints.
      In the show she did get into some subjects that would make a certain group of people uncomfortable. She is just a reporter by profession, she was doing her job. She wanted to cover different dimensions of India.
      For the Indian community who are dissatisfied with this kind of reporting, it would be better for them to take it as an opportunity to do some modifications if needed.
      Indians alone can make the changes, if required…. no one else would.
      I have to mention that the difference between the rich and the poor is extremely huge…unimaginable.
      I was fortunate to visit a friend…she lives in a place that almost resembled London or the richest areas in USA….on the other hand in a different city,, there was an older lady who used to sleep on a busy corridor (path)…this was her home. The poor people are not able to own land or have a way of earning a living….so they have to beg…it is very sad.
      Oprah spoke for rich people but she also spoke for the people without the voice….people who have to beg to live. There is a section of monks by choice who wonder and for spiritual purpose the rely on others to give food etc…but there is a section whom are forced to beg as a way of life…Oprah spoke for this people, the voiceless…that is why some people are disturbed.
      Eating by hand is neither good nor bad, it is just a way of life….If you go to China and say…’I did not know that you eat with chopsticks’….the chinese would probably give more information about how it started etc…. So far no Indian has taken time to explain to the world why it is important to eat with hands. In Indian culture, they eat with hands foods that most people would not normally use hands…like soups which they will mostly mix with rice in south India…..
      Indian culture is one of the oldest culture in the world. Many years back there was a saint by the name Manu. Manu is the one who shared the knowledge on how to live a holistic life and has told ‘eating with own hands’ is very essential. It has something to do with maintaining flow of energy…from the food to the fingers to the mouth (body). In the fingers according to Acupressure there are very important energy centers…it has something do with this…..etc Eating with hands practically everything is a sacred practice, not just a lifestyle.
      Life of Indians was designed to allow the humanity to realize their highest potential in all dimensions of life…and most importantly in the inner world. Indian culture has been more interested in raising peaceful and blissful human beings. An enlightened community… Human beings who use 100% of their God Given potential….That is why most of the enlightened beings (Realized souls/saints) on the planet earth come from India. Everything an Indian would do traditionally is designed with this on mind.
      That is why they wear kumkum (read dot in the middle of their eyebrows (to awaken the third eye), that is why they sit and sleep on the floor…This is not just a lifestyle but has a sacred purpose….
      Wearing Sari came from a different culture…not India….however now it has become part and parcel of the culture…how long??? I have seen almost every 30km or so, the food is totally different, the way they wear the sari is totally different, etc…this is the beauty of India. Saris are beautiful….even the westerners wear them…it is one of the most comfortable outfit …and very beautiful…I do not see anything wrong with Oprah mentioning about the Saris….Indians practically make all their clothes….so the necessity to keep on importing clothes is not there…Indians should be very proud of this.
      Indian like most countries have both extremes. If we agree these extremes exists then we will feel the urgency and responsibility to bring India into balance ….and the world as well….Although Oprah mentioned these things…it is not entirely her fault that things are the way they are…it is everyone’s fault….and duty to help bring the change….just complaining or blaming will not help anyone….

  18. busy ramone says:

    She should have talked about the gender disparity because of femicide, if she wanted to be more inclusive of overall Indian culture.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      Is that in reference to ‘Ready Or Not’? My sister used to live in the same building as the man who played that character’s father. He seemed nice (wife was a bit of a grump) and always went out of his way to hold doors open–especially the day she moved out. We appreciated it. How’s that for a boring story?

      I did get to meet and eat finger sandwiches with Ornette Coleman a few years ago. He was an absolute peach and the experience goes on my lifetime highlight reel. Such a warm presence.

      I got food poisoning once off of bad pizza and almost threw up on Shia LeBeouf, but I didn’t and even elegantly masked the retch.

  19. lrm says:

    meh.
    If the shoe fits….
    She could not film it if it did not exist….
    Also, as far as media stereotyping, It’s the Same as the ‘stereotypes’ ppl have about ‘America’-ie, everyone has a gun, it’s like south african apartheid [i heard that one over and over again when i lived in east africa]; all americans are loud and ignorant, etc.

    Point is: India still has many of these ‘stereotyes’ ocurring in day to day life. It’s not like an Oprah documentary is a history channel show; it’s entertainment.

    Why don’t these folks complaining via ‘twitter’ actually create their own shows to ‘educate us’ regarding how different the ‘real India’ is?

    I think they are giving O. too much credit and power here. It’s a satellite entertainment show.

  20. Luffy says:

    So people are mad that oprah is showing the unsavory parts of India? Would they rather her find people who do fit the Indian ideal of what Indians want the world the think they are.

  21. Elena says:

    And here I was thinking we all eat with our mouths. LOL!

    Seriously, India is a vast and beautiful land with rich culture and diversity one can simply not fit in a single program or two. Nor should one try, but I’m sure Oprah didn’t mean to offend anybody. She just shouldn’t have tried to depict the country as a whole, maybe just focus on a single aspect and work it from there.
    Here’s hope for future shows I probably wouldn’t watch. LOL!

  22. Ann Emmess says:

    I don’t buy “but that’s what you see there!” as an excuse. The problem is that the choices in this show demonstrate zero insight or understanding. Nothing but unexamined surface. “What you see there” is there, sure. But it’s the really glaring surface stuff a one-week tourist “sees” with no comprehension, that thoughtless media repeats endlessly as though it’s all to say about a country.

    Live in some other culture for a year or more, and you stop noticing the most blatant look-at-that-cow-in-the-road stuff in favor of much deeper sophistication. I think the anger is that this show easily had the resources to say anything, to say something novel and interesting, and instead chose to be a series of bland postcards from the 1950s.

    It sounds like this would be the US equivalent, to put it in perspective. You can “see” every one of these famous sights here, too.

    1) America has such a rich tradition of festivals! Let’s go to a hoedown and watch the square dance!

    2) Driving around America, you see many colorful gas stations and truck stops just lining the road! Look, there’s a Stuckey’s!

    3) (serious voice) Americans love their guns any way they can get them. But that love comes at a terrible price. This is the roughest neighborhood in Chicago. If you listen closely, you’ll hear the gunshots two blocks away from this decrepit home. Time to grab a sensitive human interest story about life in appalling conditions!

    4) Hollywood is like magic. Here’s a shot of the Hollywood sign! Now we’re going to meet famous movie star Tom Hanks and he’ll show us his handprints in front of Graumann’s Chinese Theater, a world-famous American landmark and the ultimate symbol of Hollywood!

    5) American food is unlike anywhere else in the world. In America, nothing matters more than PORTION SIZE. Look at those crab cakes! Look at this six-decker burger! Here’s a closeup of a guy stuffing in his loaded two-pound potato! Don’t forget all the body shots of fat people who, for legal reasons, can’t be filmed with their faces visible.